DOCSLIB.ORG

Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case Radioactive Waste Management Linkage of Geoscientific Arguments and Evidence in Supporting the Safety Case Second AMIGO Workshop Proceedings Toronto, Canada 20-22 September 2005 © OECD 2007 NEA No. 6119 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. * * * This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1st February 1958 under the name of the OEEC European Nuclear Energy Agency. It received its present designation on 20th April 1972, when Japan became its first non-European full member. NEA membership today consists of 28 OECD member countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities also takes part in the work of the Agency. The mission of the NEA is: to assist its member countries in maintaining and further developing, through international co-operation, the scientific, technological and legal bases required for a safe, environmentally friendly and economical use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as well as to provide authoritative assessments and to forge common understandings on key issues, as input to government decisions on nuclear energy policy and to broader OECD policy analyses in areas such as energy and sustainable development. Specific areas of competence of the NEA include safety and regulation of nuclear activities, radioactive waste management, radiological protection, nuclear science, economic and technical analyses of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear law and liability, and public information. The NEA Data Bank provides nuclear data and computer program services for participating countries. In these and related tasks, the NEA works in close collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, with which it has a Co-operation Agreement, as well as with other international organisations in the nuclear field. © OECD 2007 No reproduction, copy, transmission or translation of this publication may be made without written permission. Applications should be sent to OECD Publishing: [email protected] or by fax (+33-1) 45 24 99 30. Permission to photocopy a portion of this work should be addressed to the Centre Français d’exploitation du droit de Copie (CFC), 20 rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, fax (+33-1) 46 34 67 19, ([email protected]) or (for US only) to Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive Danvers, MA 01923, USA, fax +1 978 646 8600, [email protected]. FOREWORD The long-term safety of a deep geological repository for radioactive waste will be strongly dependent on the performance of the geosphere. The geosphere potentially isolates the radioactive waste from possible future intrusions by humans; provides a stable physical and chemical environment for the engineered barriers within the repository, insulating against external perturbations such as earthquakes and climate change; and prevents, delays and attenuates radionuclide transport by virtue of its hydraulic and sorptive properties. A safety case for a deep geological repository typically makes use of geoscientific information within a long-term safety assessment that evaluates potential impacts. These studies require a conceptual model of the geosphere that quantifies, for instance, groundwater flow rates and consequent radionuclide transport. However, geoscientific information can play a larger role in the safety case. In particular, geoscience can offer multiple and independent lines of evidence (qualitative and quantitative) to support a safety case. Moreover, geoscience can play an important role in other repository activities that bear on safety, such as site selection and repository design. AMIGO, an OECD/NEA international project on Approaches and Methods for Integrating Geological Information in the Safety Case, brings together geoscientists from across the international community, most of whom are involved in studies on deep geological repositories. AMIGO is organised as a series of biennial workshops with sessions that include comprehensive technical presentations from the host organisation, plenary discussions on topical issues, and small group discussions concentrating on specific questions. Each of these sessions has a single unifying goal: to enhance the role of geoscience in the safety case. The AMIGO workshops generally focus on improving the use of geoscientific information in the safety case, and more specifically on: • the role of the geosphere and its representation in the safety case; • capabilities of site characterisation versus the needs of safety assessment modelling and the safety case; and • procedures that encourage integration of a wide range of geoscientific information to contribute to the safety case more effectively. The first AMIGO workshop (AMIGO-1) was held in Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland in June 2003, and was hosted by the Swiss National Co-operative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra), the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (HSK) and the University of Bern. Amongst the topics investigated was the use of multiple lines of evidence to build confidence in the geoscientific understanding that underlies the safety case. These proceedings present the outcomes of the second AMIGO workshop (AMIGO-2), held in Toronto, Canada in September 2005 and hosted by Ontario Power Generation (OPG) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). This second workshop expanded upon the AMIGO-1 deliberations to examine how geoscientific arguments and evidence are linked in supporting a safety case. It also examined the extrapolation and transfer of geoscientific information in time and space, and the practicalities of collecting, linking and communicating this information. 3 Acknowledgements On behalf of all participants, the NEA wishes to express its gratitude to Ontario Power Generation and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission who hosted the workshop in Toronto, Canada. Special thanks are also expressed to the following individuals: • Members of the AMIGO Steering Group,1 who were responsible for the management of the AMIGO workshop series as a whole, and who set the general objectives for this and the first AMIGO workshops. • Members of the Scientific Programme Committee,2 who were responsible for the detailed planning of this second AMIGO workshop, and who defined the lists of issues to be considered during the plenary and working group presentations. • The working group chairpersons and rapporteurs, who led and summarised the debates that took place in the four working groups, and who presented their observations during the final plenary discussion. • The speakers for their interesting and stimulating presentations, and all participants for their active and constructive contributions. These proceedings drew from presentations made at the workshop, including introductory comments by Rick Beauheim, a summary of the AMIGO-1 workshop by Andreas Gautschi, summary comments by the session chair- and co-chairpersons, reports crafted by the working group rapporteurs with the assistance of the group chairperson and participants, and concluding remarks by Johan Andersson. The draft proceedings were prepared by Bruce Goodwin and Mark Jensen and reviewed by members of the Steering Group and the Scientific Programme Committee. 1. Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig (GRS Köln, chair), Johan Andersson (Streamflow AB), Rick Beauheim (SNL), Gérard Bruno (IRSN), Andreas Gautschi (Nagra), Mark Jensen (OPG), Patrick Lebon (Andra) and Sylvie Voinis (NEA). 2. Rick Beauheim (SNL, chairperson), Johan Andersson, (Streamflow; SKB representative), Bruce Goodwin (GEACI, OPG representative), Mark Jensen (OPG, co-chairperson and host), Vincent Nys (AVN), Shizong Lei (CNSC), Georges Vigneron (Andra) and Sylvie Voinis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Worsley, Tom Working Paper The evolution of London's crossrail scheme and the development of the department for transport's economic appraisal methods International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2011-27 Provided in Cooperation with: International Transport Forum (ITF), OECD Suggested Citation: Worsley, Tom (2011) : The evolution of London's crossrail scheme and the development of the department for transport's economic appraisal methods, International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2011-27, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/68827 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • How Understanding a Railway's Historic Evolution Can Guide Future
    College of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering University of Birmingham Managing Technical and Operational Change: How understanding a railway’s historic evolution can guide future development: A London Underground case study. by Piers Connor Submitted as his PhD Thesis DATE: 15th February 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Managing Technical & Operational Development PhD Thesis Abstract The argument for this thesis is that patterns of past engineering and operational development can be used to support the creation of a good, robust strategy for future development and that, in order to achieve this, a corporate understanding of the history of the engineering, operational and organisational changes in the business is essential for any evolving railway undertaking. It has been the objective of the author of this study to determine whether it is essential that the history and development of a railway undertaking be known and understood by its management and staff in order for the railway to function in an efficient manner and for it to be able to develop robust and appropriate improvement strategies in a cost-effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Annual Report for the Year Ended 31 December 2014
    2014 Integrated Annual Report for the year ended 31 December Gold Fields Integrated Annual Report 2014 Gold Fields Integrated Annual Report About Gold Fields Gold Fields Limited is an unhedged, globally diversified producer of gold with eight operating mines in Australia, Ghana, Peru and South Africa. In February 2013, Gold Fields unbundled its mature underground Beatrix and KDC mines in South Africa into an independent and separately listed company, Sibanye Gold Limited. It also expanded its presence in Australia, acquiring the Darlot, Granny Smith and Lawlers mines (known as the Yilgarn South Assets) from Barrick Gold in October 2013. Gold Fields has attributable annual gold production of approximately 2.2 million ounces, as well as attributable Mineral Reserves of around 48 million ounces and Mineral Resources of around 108 million ounces. Attributable copper Mineral Reserves total 620 million pounds and Mineral Resources 1,001 million pounds. Gold Fields has a primary listing on the JSE Limited, with secondary listings on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), NASDAQ Dubai Limited (NYX) and the Swiss Exchange (SWX). COVER PICTURES The processing plant at Gold Fields’ Granny Smith mine in Western Australia Revegetation of the tailings dam at Gold Fields’ South Deep mine in South Africa Contents INTRODUCTION IFC About this report IFC About Gold Fields IFC 1 OUR BUSINESS 1 1.1 Our DNA 2 1.2 Our global footprint – 2014 in perspective 4 1.2 Our business model 9 2 LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE 12 2.1 Vision of the Chairperson 14 2.2 CEO report
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Control of Clear Water Underground Pumping System for Demand Side Management at an Interconnected South African Goldmine
    Improved control of clear water underground pumping system for demand side management at an interconnected South African goldmine A. Meyer 22840176 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Engineering in Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Mr. W Kukard November 2016 DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP I, Anton Meyer, declare that this thesis titled, “Improved control of clear water underground pumping system for demand side management at an interconnected South African goldmine” and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. I have acknowledged all main sources of help. Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself. Signed: ______________________________ 2016/12/05 Date: _________________________________ i ABSTRACT Title: Improved control of clear water underground pumping system for demand side management at an interconnected South African goldmine Author: Anton Meyer Promoter: Warren Kukard Key words: DSM, automated, underground pumping system, multi-shaft Deep level clear water pumping at gold mines accounts for nearly 30 % of a mine’s total electricity consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Earls Court Village Development
    TRANSPORT FOR LONDON BOARD MEETING – OPEN SESSION TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY 28 SEPTEMBER 2005 IN THE CHAMBER, CITY HALL, THE QUEEN’S WALK, LONDON SE1 2AA COMMENCING AT 1500 HOURS AGENDA A Meeting of the Board will be held to deal with the following business: Procedural Matters 1.1 Apologies for Absence 1.2 Minutes of the Previous Meeting held on 13 July 2005 1.3 Any Matters Arising from the Minutes Business Items Sponsor 2. Proposed London Low Emission Zone Project Peter Hendy, Director of Surface - T(2005)06 Transport 3. The Commissioner’s Report – T(2005)01 Bob Kiley, Commissioner of TfL 4. 1st Quarter Finance and Performance Report - Jay Walder, Managing Director T(2005)02 Finance & Planning 5. Annual Report – T(2005)03 Ben Plowden, Managing Director Group Communications 6. Annual Workforce Composition Report - Valerie Todd, Director of Group T(2005)04 Equality and Inclusion 7. Door to Door Strategy – T(2005)05 Valerie Todd, Director of Group Equality and Inclusion & Peter Hendy, Director of Surface Transport Procedural Items 8. Mayoral Delegation and Direction Jay Walder, Managing Director re: Olympics – T(2005)07 Finance & Planning 9. Finance Committee Report – T(2005)08 Mike Hodgkinson, Chair of the - Meetings 23 June & 14 Sept 2005 Committee 10. Safety, Health & Environment Dave Wetzel, Chair of the Committee Report – T(2005)09 Committee - Meetings 22 June & 8 Sept 2005 Items for Noting 11. Documents Sealed on Behalf of TfL - Fiona Smith, General Counsel T(2005)10 12. Any Other Business TRANSPORT FOR LONDON Minutes 43/07/05 – 50/07/05
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Address: Are Efforts to Mechanize SA Mines Too Focused on Machinery Rather Than Technology?
    Presidential Address: Are efforts to mechanize SA mines too focused on machinery rather than technology? by J.L. Porter* Unemployment and poverty facts are painful, yet these are some of South Africa’s Synopsis vital statistics that cannot be put aside. What This paper takes a personal look, through the author’s own experiences, at possibility is there to reconcile the issues of, the implementation of innovations in the narrow-seam, hard-rock mining on the one hand, having been endowed with environment of South Africa’s mining industry over the past 40 years. A mineral bounty beyond imagination but on the number of examples are used to illustrate some of the successes and other that current public and (in some areas) failures over this period. More importantly, the examples are used to industry perception is that there is a lack of illustrate that the bulk of the investment for these projects should have ability to bring the potential mineral wealth to been applied in a manner that could have achieved more sustainable account for the long-term benefit of the results. nation? This is a complex question and I will The use of the word ‘technology’ in this context is also examined, as it attempt to answer only a relatively small part is the author’s contention that only measuring the performance of in this paper; which focuses primarily on how machinery fails to encapsulate the potential of the entire system describing changing the way people do work can lead to the scope of the innovation being implemented. These experiences and observations are projected onto the current greater success in re-engineering the mining backdrop of upheaval in the relationship between key industry methods used in the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Around Station Development Heritage Statement
    MarchMay 2020 2020 South Kensington Station - Around Station Development Heritage Statement Prepared by Alan Baxter South Kensington Underground Station Around Station Development Heritage Statement Prepared for Native Land & TfL May 2020 Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................2 2.0 Summary history of South Kensington...........................................................................................6 3.0 The station context ..............................................................................................................................11 4.0 Assessment of significance ...............................................................................................................26 5.0 Heritage Impact Assessment ...........................................................................................................41 6.0 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................................60 7.0 Sources ......................................................................................................................................................63 Appendix A: Historic South Kensington ...............................................................................................64
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Geography: Gold Mining in South Africa Contents
    MINING FOR SCHOOLS ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY: GOLD MINING IN SOUTH AFRICA CONTENTS SECTION G1 2 SECTION G5 28 What is gold? 3 Why gold mining matters 29 The discovery of gold What makes gold special? 4 Factors that favour and hinder gold 31 was a turning point in mining in South Africa Uses of gold 5 South African history, Safety and health 33 The Krugerrand 8 and South Africa’s total Environment 35 SECTION G2 9 gold reserves remain Environment and legacy issues 37 Where gold is currently mined 10 some of the world’s Gold mining technology 39 Major South African gold mining 14 Modernisation 41 most valuable. companies Quotes about gold 43 SECTION G3 15 Fun facts about gold 44 The gold mining life cycle 16 SECTION G6 45 Gold mining in South Africa SECTION G4 20 continues to be a major Terms and definitions 46 People of gold 21 contributor to the economy and the establishment of the Jobs in gold mining 25 nation’s infrastructure. Brief history of gold mining in South Africa 26 PAGE 1 MINING FOR SCHOOLS SECTION G1 Rand Refinery Limited PAGE 2 SECTION G1 WHAT IS GOLD? Gold is a metallic element with the atomic number 79 and the chemical symbol Au. Au comes The name gold comes from the Latin aurum, which from an Old English word means ‘shining dawn’. meaning yellow. In Xhosa On the periodic table of elements, gold is referred to as a ‘transition metal’ and is also and Zulu, the precious one of the so-called precious metals.
    [Show full text]
  • Not to Be Printed
    © M.A.C. Horne 2004, 2012 (Version 9.1) INFORMATION DESIGN ASPECTS OF THE LONDON UNDERGROUND MAP By M. A. C. Horne FRSA FCILT MIRO The London Underground Diagram was never designed. It is the product both of a small number of major design changes imposed upon once- indifferent mapping origins and a constant stream of evolutionary changes, not all of which have been successful (many – but not all – of the less successful changes have been discarded, and perhaps some of the better ones too). The lack of clear design criteria for the diagram may be responsible for otherwise inexplicable changes, especially with modern purchasing practice working against consistency of input by the design houses that are physically responsible for the changes made. INTRODUCTION its own — theyprinted would hardly wish to draw undue attention to competition. The proposition that the Underground Diagram is the product largely of evolution invites the question as to what kind of In the earlybe Edwardian era, local London railways were fairly map, or diagram was at the beginning of this evolutionary denselyto provided and it was convenient to show the railways process. This question is inevitably fraught with difficulty. superimposed on a street pattern; by this means it was possi- ble to show where the stations were in relation to the local Before the geometric diagram format was introduced in thenot area. This was probably regarded by railway users as a helpful 1930s, all Underground maps were geographically based,- as feature since it not only guided customers to a suitable station were virtually all other railway maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Kloof Gold Mine Technical Short Form Report
    Kloof Gold Mine Technical Short Form Report Kloof is a large, well-established intermediate to ultra deep level gold mine that is accessed from surface through a number of shafts to 45 Level (the lowest working level) some 3,347 m below surface. Kloof consists of fi ve shaft systems and two gold plants. In F2009 Kloof Gold Mine produced 0.643 Moz of gold from a combination of underground mining and processing of surface waste rock dump material at a Notional Cash Expenditure (NCE) of US$ 698/oz. Kloof total employees costed for F2009 was 16,476 including contractors. The area mined averaged some 35,674 m2 per month, underground ore processed at 200 kt per month and surface material treated 77 kt per month. Total gold production averaged some 1,667 kg per month at an average yield grade of 6.0 g/t. Signifi cant increases in power, consumable and labour costs have limited the benefi t of an increased gold price with the effect that paylimits show only nominal reductions year-on-year. This Technical Short Form Report refl ects the latest Life of Mine plan, coupled with an updated Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve statement, as at 30 June 2009. All Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve fi gures reported are managed unless otherwise stated and Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Salient Features • Focus on safe, steady state production driving volume, value and quality. • Robust orebody with world class Mineral Resources of 79.0 Moz. • Mineral Reserves of 10.5 Moz. • Main Shaft pillar extraction to commence in F2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Number: 4314 “THE ORE BODY DICTATES” EXTENDING the ECONOMIC LIFE of WITWATERSRAND ORE BODIES
    Paper Number: 4314 “THE ORE BODY DICTATES” EXTENDING THE ECONOMIC LIFE OF WITWATERSRAND ORE BODIES Author and Presenter: Boshoff J. Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited ___________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Almost all gold mining today in the world renowned Witwatersrand Basin in South African is done by means of deep level underground mines. The Witwatersrand Basin sediments are considered to be between 2 700 and 3 100 million years old, and extend laterally for some 300 km east-northeast and 150km south-southeast and comprise a 6km thickness of argillaceous and arenaceous sedimentary rocks generally dipping at shallow angles towards the centre of the basin. Gold mineralisation is hosted within quartz pebble conglomerate reefs. Major reef bands are tabular and generally less than 2 meters in thickness. Collectively, 1 608 million ounces have been mined from the Witwatersrand Basin over a period of more than 100 years. It has become increasingly difficult over the years, despite the increase in the R/kg gold price to maintain the profitability of deep level gold mines in South Africa. The majority of the mines are faced with an aging infrastructure, long travelling distances, diminishing grades and an increase in cost. Some of these mines have become very marginal and thus a different approach to define and understand the ore body and manage extraction had to be adopted. In this paper we demonstrate how we mine ore bodies in the Witwatersrand Basin beyond their expected economic life through sound ore reserve management principles, quality mining and cost control. Some case studies that focus on ore reserve management aspects at mines that were up for closure a number of years ago is presented in the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • James Henry Greathead and the London Underground
    Literator - Journal of Literary Criticism, Comparative Linguistics and Literary Studies L L ISSN: (Online) 2219-8237, (Print) 0258-2279 L Page 1 of 16 Original Research LLL i t e r a t o r James Henry Greathead and the London Underground Author: This article investigates the origins and early history of the device known as the ‘Greathead 1 Laurence Wright Shield’, an important innovation in Victorian engineering crucial to constructing the London Affiliation: Underground. The aim is to explore the basis on which, many years later, a South African 1Unit for Languages and engineer, James Henry Greathead, was accorded prominent public acknowledgment, in the Literature in the South form of a statue, for ‘inventing’ the Shield. From a cultural studies perspective, how is the African Context, North-West meaning of ‘invention’ to be understood, given that several other brilliant engineers were University, South Africa involved? The question is adjudicated using the notion of cultural ‘extelligence’, seen in Corresponding author: relation to several contemporary and historical accounts, including Greathead’s own record of Laurence Wright, his achievements in the proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers and presented in The [email protected] City and South London Railway (1896), edited by James Forrest. The paper was first delivered at Dates: the conference on ‘Novelty and Innovation in the Nineteenth Century’ held at the North-West Received: 20 July 2016 University in May 2016. Accepted: 05 Apr. 2017 Published: 24 July 2017 How to cite this article: James Henry Greathead en die Londense Moltrein. Die artikel ondersoek die oorsprong en Wright, L., 2017, ‘James vroeë geskiedenis van die toestel genaamd die ‘Greathead Skild’, ‘n belangrike nuwigheid in Henry Greathead and the Viktoriaanse ingenieurwetenskap, wat van deurslaggewende belang was in die konstruksie London Underground’, van die Londense Moltrein.
    [Show full text]