“This Is the Kairos...”
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Profiles of Peace
Profiles of Peace Forty short biographies of Israeli and Palestinian peace builders who have struggled to end the occupation and build a just future for both Palestinians and Israelis. Haidar Abdel Shafi Palestinian with a long history of working to improve the health and social conditions of Palestinians and the creation of a Palestinian state. Among his many accomplishments, Dr. Abdel Shafi has been the director of the Red Crescent Society of Gaza, was Chairman of the first Palestinian Council in Gaza, and took part in the Madrid Peace Talks in 1991. Dr. Haidar Abdel Shafi is one of the most revered persons in Palestine, whose long life has been devoted to the health and social conditions of his people and to their aspirations for a national state. Born in Gaza in 1919, he has spent most of his life there, except for study in Lebanon and the United States. He has been the director of the Red Crescent Society in Gaza and has served as Commissioner General of the Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens Rights. His passion for an independent state of Palestine is matched by his dedication to achieve unity among all segments of the Palestinian community. Although Gaza is overwhelmingly religiously observant, he has won and kept the respect and loyalty of the people even though he himself is secular. Though nonparti- san he has often been associated with the Palestinian left, especially with the Palestinian Peoples Party (formerly the Palestinian Communist Party). A mark of his popularity is his service as Chairman of the first Palestinian Council in Gaza (1962-64) and his place on the Executive Committee of “There is no problem of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) (1964-65). -
Instructor's Name
Dr. Terry Hidichuk The United Centre for Theological Studies (204) 786-9247 [email protected] Dr. Dean Peachey Global College (204)988-7106 [email protected] GTHEO 7362 730 Theological Reflections in Context: Religion, Rights and Relationships in Israel and the West Bank Location: Room 3M60 Dates: On-campus classes - Thursday, 6:00-9:00 pm – Jan 8, 15, 22, 29, Feb 5, 12 Field portion - February 15-27 On-campus classes - 6:00-9:00 pm – March 12, 19, 26 Course Description: This course explores contemporary conflict and justice issues in Israeli-Palestinian relations, with particular attention to the perspectives and contributions of the three Abrahamic faith traditions, along with secular narratives. The course will meet once a week on campus, and include two weeks in Israel and the West Bank. This field portion will include guest lectures from various individuals and groups, visits to sites of historical, political and theological significance. Learning Outcomes: 1: Students will be able to articulate an understanding of the conflict in Israel and the West Bank from a variety of perspectives. 2: Students will be able to think critically about and respond to scholars and authors who have researched and written about rights, religion and relationship in the region. 3: Through the process of compassionate listening, students will learn how to listen without judgment and in ways that invite disagreement. 4: (outcomes to be determined during the first class in discussion with students) 5: (outcomes to be determined during the first class in discussion with students) Required Textbooks: (TENTATIVE) Chacour, E. -
Palestinian Resistance and International Solidarity: the BDS Campaign ABIGAIL B
SAGE Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC Palestinian resistance and international solidarity: the BDS campaign ABIGAIL B. BAKAN and YASMEEN ABU-LABAN Abstract: Israel’s recent war in Gaza (‘Operation Cast Lead’) has both exposed Israel’s defiance of international law and provided the occasion for increasing support for an organised transnational boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement. The BDS movement is aimed at challenging the Israeli state’s ille- gal military occupation and a host of corresponding repressive policies directed at Palestinians. However, the BDS campaign, and in particular the call for an academic boycott, has been controversial. It has generated a counter-response emphasising, variously, the goals of the movement as ineffective, counter- productive to peace and/or security, contrary to norms of academic freedom and even tied to anti-Judaism and anti-Semitism. Utilising a Gramscian approach, and drawing from Charles Mills’ concept of ‘racial contract’, we examine the history of the divestment campaign and the debates it has engendered. We argue that the effectiveness of BDS as a strategy of resistance and cross-border solidarity is intimately connected with a challenge to the hegemonic place of Zionism in western ideology. This campaign has challenged an international Abigail Bakan is Professor of Political Studies at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Her publications include Negotiating Citizenship: migrant women in Canada and the global system (with Daiva K. Stasiulis), winner of the 2007 Canadian Women’s Studies Association annual book award, and Critical Political Studies: debates and dialogues from the Left (co-editor with Eleanor MacDonald). -
Legal Decision-Making During the Palestinian Intifada: Embryonic Self-Rule
Legal Decision-Making During the Palestinian Intifada: Embryonic Self-Rule Adrien Katherine Wingt I. INTRODUCTION ................................................ 95 II. LEGITIMACY AND COERCION ........................................ 100 III. LEGAL TRADITIONS ............................................. 102 A. Customary Law ............................................. 102 B. Islamic Religious Law .......................................... 105 C. Ottoman Law .............................................. 106 D. British Mandate Law ......................................... 107 E. Jordanianand Egyptian Civil Law .................................. 108 F. Israeli Civil and Military Law ..................................... 110 IV. NEw ACTORS ................................................. 113 V. INSTITUTIONS ................................................. 116 A. U L.U .................................................. 116 B. Popular Committees .......................................... 119 C. -Police .................................................. 120 D. Judiciary ................................................ 121 VI. DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES .................................... 123 VII. RULES .................................................... 128 A. Landlord Tenant Relations....................................... 130 B. Strikes .................................................. 131 C. Labor Relations ............................................. 132 D. Women's Rights ............................................ 134 E. Penaltiesfor -
Israeli Land Grab and Forced Population Transfer of Palestinians: a Handbook for Vulnerable Individuals and Communities
ISRAELI LAND GRAB AND ISRAELI LAND GRAB AND FORCED POPULATION TRANSFORCEDFER OF PALEST POINPIANSULAT: ION TRANSFERA Handbook OF PALEST for INIANS Vulnerable Individuals and Communities A Handbook for Vulnerable Individuals and Communities BADIL بديــل Resource Center املركز الفلسطيني for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights ملصـادر حقـوق املواطنـة والﻻجئـيـن Bethlehem, Palestine June 2013 BADIL بديــل Resource Center املركز الفلسطيني for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights ملصـادر حقـوق املواطنـة والﻻجئـيـن Researchers: Amjad Alqasis and Nidal al Azza Research Team: Thayer Hastings, Manar Makhoul, Brona Higgins and Amaia Elorza Field Research Team: Wassim Ghantous, Halimeh Khatib, Dr. Bassam Abu Hashish and Ala’ Hilu Design and Layout: Atallah Salem Printing: Al-Ayyam Printing, Press, Publishing & Distribution Company 152 p. 24cm ISBN 978-9950-339-39-5 ISRAELI LAND GRAB AND FORCED POPULATION TRANSFER OF PALESTINIANS: A HANDBOOK FOR VULNERABLE INDIVIDUALS AND COMMUNITIES / 1. Palestine 2. Israel 3. Forced Population Transfer 4. Land Confiscation 5. Restrictions on Use and Access of Land 6. Home Demolitions 7. Building Permits 8. Colonization 9. Occupied Palestinian Territory 10. Israeli Laws DS127.96.S4I87 2013 All rights reserved © BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights June 2013 Credit and Notations Many thanks to all interview partners who provided the foundation for this publication, in particular to Suhad Bishara, Nasrat Dakwar, Manal Hazzan-Abu Sinni, Quamar Mishirqi, Ekram Nicola and Mohammad Abu Remaileh for their insightful and essential guidance in putting together this handbook. We would also like to thank Gerry Liston for his contribution in providing the legal overview presented in the introduction and Rich Wiles for his assistance throughout the editing phase. -
The Apartheid Paradigm in Palestine-Israel
THE APARTHEID PARADIGM IN PALESTINE-ISRAEL: ISSUES OF JUSTICE AND EQUALITY Desmond Tutu CONFERENCE SPONSORED BY FRIENDS OF SABEEL NORTH AMERICA HOSTED BY FRIENDS OF SABEEL NEW ENGLAND Noam Chomsky John Dugard OCTOBER 26 – 27, 2007 Naim Ateek OLD SOUTH CHURCH Diana Buttu 645 BOYLSTON ST BOSTON, MA Donald Wagner USA Jeff Halper Anat Biletzki Noura Erekat Farid Esack David Wildman Phyllis Bennis Joan Martin Nancy Murray photo: Anne Paq/activestills.org What is Apartheid? In 1973, the UN General Assembly adopted the international Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, a crime against humanity. The word ‘apartheid’ means separation in Afrikaans, a language spoken in South Africa. ‘Apartheid’ is defined by the UN as “…a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group … over another … and systematically oppressing them…” by creating ghettos, confiscating land, banning freedom of movement, speech and mixed-marriage and through illegal arrest and detention. Marcia Bushnell "Interrogation" oil/canvas What is Hafrada? The Hebrew word for separation has come to be used by Israeli policy makers to refer to the idea of creating deliberate divisions between Israelis and Palestinians. Israel's barrier carving through the Palestinian West Bank is a conspicuous example, planned to stretch more than 400 miles including the endless spans of 25-foot-high concrete wall still under construction. The structure is called a 'separation fence' in Hebrew. The expression 'unilateral disengagement' for Israel's actions, for example, in Gaza, is yet another way to frame the officially-sanctioned policy of apartheid. -
Obstacles to Peace
Rehov Tiveria 37 Tel: +972-(0)54-303-9170 Website: www.icahd.org 94543 Jerusalem, Israel E-mail: [email protected] OBSTACLES TO PEACE A REFRAMING OF THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT Written and Presented By Jeff Halper, Director The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) Maps Prepared and Designed By Michael Younan and PalMap of GSE Front Cover Photograph By Anna da Sacco May, 2018 Copyright 2018. This document is protected by international copyrights. If any part of this document is reproduced in any form, acknowledgment should be given to the authors and their affiliated organizations. WHAT IS ICAHD? THE ISRAELI COMMITTEE AGAINST HOUSE DEMOLITIONS The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) is a non-violent Israeli direct-action organization established 2 in 1997 to end Israel’s Occupation over the Palestinians. A grassroots organization, ICAHD has focused on the Big political Picture even while engaging in protest, resistance and informational activities “on the ground.” We seek, together with our Palestinian, Israeli and international partners, to formulate and achieve a genuinely just political settlement to the Israeli- 4 Palestinian “conflict,” one that revolves around the creation of a single democratic state over the entire country. 8 As it name implies, ICAHD takes as the main focus of its resistance Israel’s policy of demolishing Palestinian homes, both in Israel and in the Occupied Territory. A key element of judaization,” of transforming Palestine into the Land of Israel, 9 is the demolition of Palestinian homes and entire communities. During the Nakba some 52,000 Palestinian homes were destroyed, more than 530 villages, towns and urban neighborhoods. -
Introduction
Introduction Something unthinkable happened in the United States in the last few years: hundreds of academics—senior scholars and graduate students and untenured faculty—came forth in support of an academic boycott of Israel. Beginning in 2013, the movement to boycott Israeli academic institutions expanded rapidly with one major academic association after another endorsing the boycott and adopting resolutions in solidarity with the Palestinian call for an academic boycott. But this movement emerged several years after Palestinian academics, intellectuals, and activists called for an academic and cultural boycott of Israel, in 2004— and after years of military occupation, failed peace negotiations, ever-expanding and illegal Jewish settlements on Palestinian land, ongoing home demolitions, the building of the Israeli Wall, repression, and military assaults. All of these events and the military occupation of Palestine itself have been endorsed, defended, and funded by Israel’s major global ally, the United States. The academic boycott and the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement are thus embedded in a signifi cant aspect 1 2 / Introduction of the U.S. political and historical relationship to the Middle East, and in a particular cultural imaginary of Palestine, Pales- tinians, and Arabs in general, that has become an increasingly central concern of American studies. What is the signifi cance of Boycott, Divestment, and Sanc- tions (BDS) and academic boycott activism, in particular, for the U.S. academy and for social justice movements? What political paradigm is introduced by the academic boycott, and how has this transformed the debate about Palestine-Israel in the United States, and in the academy in particular? I focus on the academic boycott as a social movement that is at the intersection of anti- war, human rights, and global justice organizing in the univer- sity and beyond, and increasingly embedded in antiracist, femi- nist, and queer movements as well. -
(ANSO) Screening the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Department of Anthropology and Sociology PROFESSOR (ANSO) Academic year 2019-2020 Riccardo Bocco [email protected] Screening the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Office hours Competing and Complementary Narratives through Cinematic Representations ASSISTANT ANSO096- Autumn - 6 ECTS Marie De Lutz [email protected] Schedule & Room Office hours Course Description A consistent body of knowledge about the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been produced by several social science disciplines. However, to date, few attempts have been made to combine that knowledge with the narratives produced on the conflict by films, both fictions and documentaries. Audio-visual materials related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are ‘constructions’ and interpretations of ‘realities’ at different levels, and constitute an important (memory and documentary) archive which can complement and accompany the work of research in human and social sciences. This seminar will therefore aim at examining, in a socio-political and historical perspective, the role of film directors –Israeli and Palestinian in particular- as artists and social actors, who contribute to (re)shape national and local narratives, in supporting or challenging official histories and collective memories. A selection of films produced over a time span of 15 years will be studied: from those related to the Second Intifada (2000-2005) and its immediate aftermath, to those covering the ongoing conflict during the past decade. Interestingly, the Israeli and Palestinian cinematic narratives produced during these two periods show important aspects of convergence and complementarity in addressing peace and conflict dynamics in both societies. And gendering the approaches of film directors to the chosen movies’ topics will be part and parcel of the overall endeavour. -
Speaking Truth to Power
1 SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER By Ceil Lavan, Blauvelt Dominican Justice Promoter Speaking Truth to Power is a prophetic action my Blauvelt Congregation has chosen to put into practice. Speaking Truth to Power is a challenge for each and every one of us. The first Dominican community in the Americas offers us a helpful model. Their behavior makes us proud to be Dominican, which feels really good, and at the same time it inspires us to speak truth to the powers of our day, which makes us a little nervous. The courage of Father Anton Montesinos to speak out in defense of the indigenous people of Hispaniola against the ‘powers that be’ (European royalty, the Vatican, local conquistadors and settlers/parishioners) was a result of communal action. Speaking out alone is more difficult and less effective than speaking out as a group. It was the collective study of the issue of the cruel treatment of the indigenous at the hands of the Spanish explorers and settlers that empowered the Dominicans to compose their prophetic sermon. Just as the Dominican community collectively writing the sermon empowered the preaching of Montesinos, collective commitment empowers us to speak truth to power. One way this is happening today is through the Corporate Stances many Dominican Congregations have taken on issues such as the Death Penalty, Nuclear Weapons, and Immigration Rights. Corporate stances empower congregations to speak publicly as a body; they also allow individual members, congregational groups and leaders to speak out in the name of the congregation. Speaking out on some issues gets more public support than others, though it is never easy to speak prophetically. -
Neoliberalism's Role in Palestinian Apartheid
Locus: The Seton Hall Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 2 Article 3 September 2019 Occupation: Neoliberalism’s Role in Palestinian Apartheid Devyn Johnson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/locus Recommended Citation Johnson, Devyn (2019) "Occupation: Neoliberalism’s Role in Palestinian Apartheid," Locus: The Seton Hall Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/locus/vol2/iss1/3 Johnson: Occupation Occupation: Neoliberalism’s Role in Palestinian Apartheid Devyn Johnson Seton Hall University Abstract Arendt discusses the concept of the banality of evil in connection to the Eichmann Trials, explain- The Palestinian-Israeli conflict remains one of ing the idea as the recognition that one, ordinary the most contentious political topics in our world people are capable of terrible deeds, and two, ev- today. Although violence has been spewed from eryday acts can become evil if they are perceived both sides, imbalance is demonstrated in power as normal and acceptable by the general public. structures used to maintain occupation by the This, however, does not excuse the evil that is cre- state of Israel. Using the concept of Neoliberal- ated and as was affirmed in Eichmann’s trial, all ism, this paper seeks to explain the motives be- individuals are accountable for their own actions. hind state political and economic practices that The circumstances are no different in Israel and subdue the Palestinian public and control the nar- Palestine; violence enacted by the State of Israel rative of its actions. As attributes of neoliberalism in the various forms it takes in occupation - is nor- such as privatization, wealth inequality, and secu- malized. -
What Price Israel?, the Title of Our Issue, Is Taken from Alfred Lilien- Elizabeth D
Published by Americans for The Link Middle East Understanding, Inc. Volume 44, Issue 1 Link Archives: www.ameu.org January-March, 2011 A former New York Times Middle East correspondent looks at America’s support for the Jewish state—and asks: What Price Israel? By Chris Hedges The Link Page 2 AMEU Board About This Issue of Directors Jane Adas (Vice President) What Price Israel?, the title of our issue, is taken from Alfred Lilien- Elizabeth D. Barlow thal’s1953 book of the same name. Much has transpired since then. The ensuing half-century has seen an ever more passionate United States in- Edward Dillon volvement with the Jewish state. Rod Driver John Goelet To bring us up to date on the cost of that Special Relationship we turn David Grimland to Chris Hedges. In 2002, Hedges was one of the reporters at The New Richard Hobson (Treasurer) York Times who was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for the paper’scoverage of Anne R. Joyce global terrorism. He is also the recipient of Amnesty International’sGlobal Hon. Robert V. Keeley Award for Human Rights Journalism. His book “WarIs a Force That Gives Kendall Landis Us Meaning”(2002) was a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award for Nonfiction. For movie buffs, it was also the source for the quote Robert L. Norberg (President) used in the opening of the 2009 Acad- Hon. Edward L. Peck emy Award-winning film, The Hurt Donald L. Snook Locker: “The rush of battle is often a Rosmarie Sunderland potent and lethal addiction, for war is James M.