Headmark 075 20-1 February-April 1994
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AUSTRALIAN NAVAL INSTITUTE INC The Australian Naval Institute was formed and incorporated in the Australian Capital Territory in 1975. The main objects of the Institute arc: • To encourage and promote the advancement of knowledge related to the Navy and the mari- time profession, • to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas concerning subjects related to the Navy and the maritime profession, and • to publish a journal. The Institute is self-supporting and non-profit-making. All publications of the Institute will stress that the authors express their own views and opinions are not necessarily those of the Depart- ment of Defence, the Chief of Naval Staff or the Institute. The aim is to encourage discussion, dissemination of information, comment and opinion and the advancement of professional knowl- edge concerning naval and maritime matters. The membership of the Institute is open to: • Regular Members. Regular membership is open to members of the RAN or RANK and per- sons who having qualified for regular membership, subsequently leave the service. • Associate Members. Associate membership is open to all other persons not qualified to be Regular Members, who profess an interest in the aims of the Institute. • Honorary Members. Honorary membership is open to persons who have made a distinguished contribution to the Navy or the maritime profession, or by past service to the institute. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Australian Naval Institute is grateful for the assistance provided by the corporations listed below. They are demonstrating their support for the aim of the Institute by being members of the "Friends of the Australian Naval Institute" coterie. Australian Defence Industries Rockwell Systems Australia Blohm + Voss Stanilite Electronics Computer Sciences of Australia GEC Marconi Jeumont Schneider Division Westinghouse Electric Atlas Electronik (Australia) CelsiusTech Ansett Australia Thomson Sintra Pacific Scientific Management Associates Telecom Journal of the Australian Naval Institute his Journal is published by the Aus Volume 20 Number 1 February/April 1994 Ttralian Naval Institute, PO Box 80, Campbell. ACT. The Journal is intended as a forum and SPECIAL FEATURE: the opinions expressed in it are those of the relevant contributor. resent and recent members of the RAN remember Vietnam in a particu- Nothing in this Journal should be read as P the opinion or policy of the Chief of the lar and very special way: A Canberra re- Naval Staff, the Royal Australian Navy, searcher, Michael Fogarty, has put together the Commonwealth or the Institute itself. a fascinating account of the time before that, The Institute welcomes contributions from back to the post-colonial era, when Austral- members or non-members on any topic touching on the naval or maritime profes- ian ships visited Saigon for a different rea- sions son... Page 23 REGULARS In this Issue Vice-President's report 2 Maritime Power — Its importance to New Zealand: Editorial 3 Gerald Henslcy Page 7 Washington Notes 4 Does the current RAN approach to competency Letter to the Editor 10 based training destroy excellence?: CPOBTS Phillip Solomon Book Reviews 62 Another look at the Australia/southeast Asia mari- time nexus: LCDR D C Littlehales / 7 How would Australia survive an attempt to deny us passage through the Indonesian straits? LCDR B Victor Page 41 Do you really know what Cost Effectiveness means in Defence? If you don't you should: LCDR Alan Hinge Page51 The New Zealand Maritime Safety Authority, in- troduced by its boss: Ian Mackay 59 COVER PHOTOGRAPH: STS Young Endeavour at dusk. Picture by ARPH Craig Duff of Navy Public Information Branch Journal of the Australian Naval Institute l-chruar\ 1994 AGM REPORT: From the Vice President We welcome Rear Admiral Chris Oxenbould as our officers and sailors to contribute to the journal, and new President and look forward to his regular col- I congratulate CPO Solomon on his fine contribu- umn which will start in the May journal. Also, we tion in this issue. welcome the other new Council members as well as the RNZN and RNZNVR members who were Broadening our target population voted in as regular members at this AGM (a copy of the passed motion is set out below). We must also have something more to offer to the Maritime community than the journal, no matter how Another major AGM agenda item involved deter- high a quality product it is. While not neglecting mining the way ahead for the Institute. Fortunately, our naval focus, we could encourage participation as the financial report presented with this journal by those members of the maritime community who indicates, we are in a very healthy financial situa- we have not yet begun to tap by setting the agenda tion with a record profit being made last year. This for the maritime debate. I believe we need to be is mainly due to the contributions of an ever widen- provocative in the true sense of the word to stimu- ing group of 'Friends' of the Institute, with the late the discussion. The list of possible contributors Dawson Group becoming the newest member late to the debate is endless and we can also invite com- last year. Financial sufficiency gives us the means ment from the Australian fishing industry through to help fund necessary initiatives and address prob- selective reprinting of articles from their professional lems in the coming year. One of these problems is journals. declining membership. Our target community could also be broadened to Membership include the Coastwatch organisation and their par- ent, Customs. It could include port/harbour anil Reduced membership of the ANI is a symptom of, marine authorities, marine pilots. Off-shore resource not a cause of. the declining status of the Institute companies and the Australian flag merchant fleet as as a vehicle for the exchange of maritime ideas and well as those foreign fleets who ply the Australian ideals in this country. Whatever the reasons for this coast. Each has a need to influence or respond to decline it must now be reversed and a clear way the influence of the Industry of the sea. ahead for the Institute should be formulated. Friends I think we all agree on the need to boost member- ship significantly and. in my opinion, our objective There is potential to encourage and recruit many should be a membership of 1400 which would en- more Friends of the ANI if we are able to present sure that we can financially self support a high qual- them with worthwhile reasons to be Friends, and I ity journal. However, we should examine our mo- believe we can. One reason involves offering tives for increasing membership and growth must Friends - who could fall into several categories de- occur for the right reasons. If we are convinced pending on the amount of their financial contribu- that the maritime debate is important for the contin- tion - the opportunity to advertise in the Journal in ued security of our respective countries then we are cither full or halt page advertisements. We should probably half way there in terms of motivation. aim for 20 or more Friends (we currently have 15) However, who should contribute to the debate and to support such ventures as seminars and symposi- how should we, the ANI, be setting out to facilitate ums on a more frequent basis. Among these ven- the debate? tures will be those resulting from our continuing, successful partnership with the RAN Maritime Stud- The Journal ies Programme. This often involves bringing guest speakers to Australia from overseas to deliver lec- The flagship for the ANI has long been the Journal tures, orations and play key roles at seminars. In- which will undergo a "face lift' this year in terms of deed, the visiting speaker program is well underway presentation and content. It will do its part in spear- with more details to be given in the next issue of the heading a rise in status through enlightened com- journal. ment and vigorous debate and build on the founda- tions set in place by our previous editor. The Jour- Your Council nal will also serve as a vehicle for our Friends to broadcast their existence and wares to members, It remains the aim of your Council to constantly seek customers and the Maritime community generally. out new blood and fresh ideas for the administra- Certainly, a priority in 1994 is to get more junior tion of the Institute. We will endeavour to have keen February 1994 Journal of the Australian Naval Institute and capable young folk eager to serve as council- Note - The following amendment was proposed to lors on a board that is able to give them the benefit the ANI Constitution at the 1994 ANI AGM: of more mature, experienced naval personnel, be they permanent or reserve members of the Navy. 2.(1) "Regular members" shall consist of mem- bers of the RAN or ANR, RNZN or RNZNVR and Those of us who serve the ANI form the nucleus for persons who, having qualified for membership, sub- the way ahead and 1994 is measuring up to be a sequently leave the service, all whom are members successful year for the Institute. There can be no of the Institute in accordance with Rule 6. denying that the task will be difficult, time consum- ing and ,at times, at odds with the demands of our The proposed amendment was: RNZN or RN/NVR current jobs, but there is no alternative if the ANI is to flourish for all the right reasons. The motion was passed by a two thirds majority of members on 3rd March 1994 at Legacy House, Terry Morgan Dcakin ACT. FROM THE EDITOR Observant readers will notice some fully at changes affecting the Serv- minor changes in this issue.