DOCSLIB.ORG

The Recent Ameinu Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Recent Ameinu Conference The Recent Ameinu Conference Ameinu’s organization, “The Third Narrative,” sponsored a “progressive academic teach-in” at the CUNY Journalism School on November 1. It featured outstanding advocates of Peace, the two-state settlement, and social justice in Israel and Palestine, among them Peter Beinart, JJ Goldberg, Ghaith al- Omari, Todd Gitlin and Michael Walzer, among others. It should be said at the outset that Ameinu assembled a progressive cast that does it credit; the Board Members of PPI in attendance, including Irwin Wall, Leanard Grob, and Lilly Rivlin found little if anything to criticize, except, perhaps, that the panelists all agreed with one another as well as with us. One also could say the gorilla in the room, boycott, was ignored; all seemed to accept that Beinart’s kind of Zionist boycott of the West Bank only, also the policy of PPI, is legitimate. The conference would seem to presage a warmer and more energetic cooperation between our organizations, along the lines of our successful joint petition in favor of supporting the Iran agreement. If this colloquium is indicative of Ameinu’s views, there is little daylight between them and Partners. On the other hand, Israel’s Labor party, of which Ameinu pretends to be the American arm, came in for some severe criticism at the conference. None of the panelists made reference to Meretz. This was regrettable, because it left the implication that there are no voices in Israel to partner with in pursuing the struggle for two states and against the occupation. Peter Beinart led off, and although most of what he said we have heard before, his argument was cogent and well put-together and his recommendations for action strong and doable. In fact I will propose here later that PPI immediately follow up on one of them. What are Beinart’s points? The Israeli Right and the American Jewish establishment believe that Jew-hatred in the world is visceral and elemental, and all enemies of the Jews are reincarnations of the original Biblical enemy, sons of Esau, Amalekites in the biblical era, today called Nazis or Palestinians. They hate us no matter what we do and they can only be stopped by Jewish power. Settlements today in Palestinian land do not matter or are a smokescreen because our enemies will oppose us anyway, so Israel must keep the settlements and its control over the entire Jordan valley. Palestinian hatred of us precludes allowing the existence of a Palestinian state. Anti-Zionists, on the other hand, claim as theirs the entire land of Palestine and contest the legitimacy of Jewish nationalism. They reject Oslo or the legitimacy of Jewish national self-determination. The 1967 frontiers are irrelevant for them as they are to Jewish nationalists; there must be one state in Palestine for Jews and Arabs. To get out of this bind, Beinart says, each side must learn to understand the narrative and legitimacy of the claims of the other. In 1993, in the Oslo agreements, they basically did. However, Rabin’s assassination upset the apple cart and brought the Right to power, and in all subsequent negotiations the Israelis have sought to keep the bulk of the settlements and refused the concessions necessary to create a Palestinian state. The failures of the Palestinians to accept the “offers” made by Barak in 2000 and Olmert in 2008 were due to the fact that the Palestinians were being offered less that they had agreed to at Oslo; the 1967 frontiers with territorial swaps. When they agreed to recognize Israel, they agreed to the 1967 frontiers which gave Israel 78% of the land and the Palestinians the remaining 22%. That is already a big defeat for the Palestinians, and the Oslo accords were never a real recognition of the legitimacy of Israel as a realistic recognition of Israel’s power, a pragmatic surrender. They cannot accept even less than the 22% of the British mandate that Oslo promised them. The danger now is the collapse of the Palestinian Authority because it has failed to deliver a state, either through struggle or diplomacy. Diplomatic movement is necessary to end the current crisis and the renewed violence. There are three things Americans can do, Beinart says. One: pressure the administration to allow a UN resolution through that defines the parameters of a solution to the conflict. Unfortunately there is little to hope for from our lame-duck president; having won his battle for the Iran agreement he shows little appetite for punishing Netanyahu, who it seems, the more he humiliates the administration, gets even more from it in terms of weapons in recompense. France having withdrawn its own UN effort, largely because of lack of American support, New Zealand has now picked up the ball. The second thing is for Americans to recognize the Palestinians. American Jewish trips to Israel typically ignore the existence of the Palestinians. But more importantly, inject the issue into the campaign. The Republicans are hopeless, they all support Bibi while some of them are to his political Right. But the real disappointment is on the Democratic side; Hillary shows little more daylight between herself and Bibi than the Republicans. Nor has Sanders been articulate or effective; Beinart suggests progressives who are for Israel approach Sanders and try to enlighten him on the Israel-Palestine issue, in the hope that if he energizes American political support for two states Hillary Clinton will have to follow suit. PPI, among American Jewish organizations, is ideologically closest to Sanders and is uniquely suited to follow up on Beinart’s suggestion and I intend to propose to its Board that it do so. Beinart notes that the strong black and Hispanic and Asian presence in the Democratic party, not to mention the growing influence of Arab-Americans who are American-educated and able to present the Palestinian case in terms of the American constitution and human rights, will in the future in “any event bring the Democrats closer to an embrace of the Palestinian cause. JJ Goldberg and Ghaith al-Omari presented parallel explanations of the current violence and each addressed the bankruptcy of leadership on the two sides in attempting to address it. The operative words are rage and despair. The two previous Palestinian Intifadas, the first largely rock- throwing, the second characterized by terrorist bombings, offer little guidance. Today’s actors are disorganized and spontaneous perpetrators using the most primitive of weapons fashioned from the objects of daily life. Those old enough to drive use their cars to run over Jewish Israelis; the very young assail their oppressors with kitchen knives and screw drivers. There is no organized political presence nor is there obvious leadership or guidance, nor does the movement articulate political goals. It clearly reflects, however, the desperation of the young people who are apparently willing to die, “martyr” themselves as they see it, in order to protest the poverty, hopelessness, and statelessness under which they live. Rage, despair, and hopelessness characterize the Israeli response as well, with two effects. The middle class and secular Jews are emigrating in large numbers (as is the Palestinian middle class). The political center of gravity in Israel continues its precipitous slide to the right, led by the Prime Minister, who presents a sometimes revered historical leader of the Palestinians, the Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini, as the instigator of the Holocaust while announcing that while he is against a bi-national state, Israel will nevertheless keep control of all the territory between the Jordan river and the sea “for the foreseeable future.” Israel must “live by the sword.” Bibi, it would seem, has endorsed the Apartheid state, although Goldberg cations against use of the word to describe it, it is just as ugly by any other name. And it is indeed open season on Arab lives as Israelis arm themselves and shoot the stabbers. Beinart, for his part, ominously warned that as the generation that witnessed the birth of Israel passes from the scene, the current generation risks witnessing Israel’s demise: a non- Democratic Israel for Beinart would be a “dead Israel.” The Left such as it is, Goldberg says, is absent in Israel as Herzog cravenly parrots the Rightist language of Netanyahu. Goldberg perhaps did not notice the peace demonstration and call for renewed diplomacy in Tel-Aviv on October 24 at which Zehava Galon and other Meretz MKs were present and Zehava eloquently spoke. “Bibi, you’ve failed. You’ve failed in providing personal security for the citizens of Israel, you’ve failed in proposing any kind of vision for changing the reality,” she said. “The only thing the Netanyahu government has to offer is for us to arm ourselves, pop anyone who looks like a terrorist in the head. This government is calling for a boycott on Israel’s Arab citizens, is allowing people to kill and agitating against members of the Left,” she said. “I’m telling you Bibi – when blood is spilled here in the name of the Holocaust, the finger won’t be pointed at the Mufti, it will be pointed at you,” she added. (Read more at: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.682136.) But Bibi, whose grasp on power is tenuous, deftly manipulates the politics of fear. The only other rational voices in the country, Goldberg notes, come from the retiring and perhaps politically ambitious generals, who are not afraid to indict settler violence against Palestinians as a contributing cause to the disorders. Indeed we were all treated to the spectacle of Rabbi Arik Ascherman, the Head of Rabbis for Human Rights, being physically attacked by a black-masked settler while the Rabbi was trying to help Palestinians harvest olives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Interdependency of Mass Media and Social Movements
    The Interdependency of Mass Media and Social Movements Rens Vliegenthart Stefaan Walgrave Abstract This chapter discusses the interaction between social movements and the mass media. It explains why and how this relationship can be seen as one of mutual dependency. Social movements need mass media attention to amplify their claims; the media attend to movements because they create newsworthy events. We take stock of the research that has been done and focus on various elements of this relationship. Following a classic political communication process approach, we first discuss the causes for media to devote attention to social movements and their events. Next, we focus on the content of this coverage and how it is analyzed by social movement scholars. Finally, we look at the various consequences of media coverage for social movements, in terms of mobilization, reaching political change and obtaining favorable public opinion. Authors’ bio Rens Vliegenthart is assistant professor in political communication in the department of Communication Science and at the Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam. His research focuses on media-politics dynamics, with a special interest in the role of non-institutional actors, such as social movements. Furthermore, he has an interest in methods for comparative research in political communication and the application of time series analysis in that area. 1 Stefaan Walgrave is professor in political science at the University of Antwerp (Belgium) and head of the Media, Movements, and Politics research group (M²P). His research focuses mainly on media and politics and on social movements and political protest. In political communication, his main research is political agenda- setting by the mass media.
    [Show full text]
  • JEWISH ,E4a!&Ead
    JEWISH $3.00 Frontier Ehud Barak's ,e4a!&ead CONTENTS JEWISH Vol. LXVI, No. 3 & 4 (635-6) M SUMMER 1999 Front er Israel 3 SINCE 1934 A SWEET AND SOUR VICTORY Susan Hattis Rolef A LABOR ZIONIST JOURNAL INAUGURAL ADDRESS : TOWARD 6 PEACE AND SOCIAL PROGRESS Ehud Barak Founders Hayim Greenberg Marie Syrkin JEWISH DUALISM 13 Chaim Nachman Editorial Board Bialik Henry Feingold, Chairman Saul B . Cohen History 18 I Hyman Faine THE KEHILAH IN WARSAW David Rosenthal Jonathan J. Goldberg Emanuel S . Goldsmith Jerry Goodman COPYRIGHTS : ANCIENT 20 Rabbi Mark W. Kiel AND MODERN Harold Ticktin Chava Lapin Judy Loebl Jeffry V. Mallow Books 23 Daniel Mann THE HOLOCAUST IN Mordecai Newman Samuel Norich AMERICAN LIFE Michael S . Perry By Peter Novick Henry L. Feingold Mark Raider Eduardo Rauch Ezra Spicehandler AN AFTERNOON WITH 25 Phyllis Sutker MEYER LEVIN Si Wakesberg David Twersky Mazal Tov 26 MISHA LOUVISH Nahum Guttman Editor In Memoriam 27 HYMAN R. FAINE Daniel Mann NOTE TO SUBSCRIBERS Saadia Gelb If you plan to move, please notify us six weeks in advance . A LABOR ZIONIST 30 PEACE MISSION Stephane Acel JEWISH FRONTIER (ISSN-0021-6453) is published bi-monthly by Labor Zionist JEWISH FRONTIER Letters, Inc . Editorial and advertising offices at 275 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 . Periodicals postage paid at New York, NY . POSTMASTER : Send address changes to Circulation, Jewish Frontier, 275 Seventh Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, 275 Seventh Avenue NY 10001 . Subscription rates for U .S. and possessions, $15 .00 per year for 6 issues, $25 .00 for 17th Floor two years for 12 issues .
    [Show full text]
  • The Sixties Counterculture and Public Space, 1964--1967
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2003 "Everybody get together": The sixties counterculture and public space, 1964--1967 Jill Katherine Silos University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Silos, Jill Katherine, ""Everybody get together": The sixties counterculture and public space, 1964--1967" (2003). Doctoral Dissertations. 170. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/170 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Engagement Beyond Hasbarah from the Editor
    THE STEINHARDT FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH LIFE AUTUMN 2011/CHESHVAN 5772 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 THE JOURNAL OF THE STEINHARDT FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH LIFE ISRAEL ENGAGEMENT BEYOND HASBARAH FROM THE EDITOR AUTUMN 2011/CHESHVAN 5772 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 ISRAEL ENGAGEMENT Eli Valley BEYOND HASBARAH Editor or decades, Israel engagement in North America hewed to a narrow narrative line. If Erica Coleman not overtly political, the methods of engagement frequently had politics just beneath Copy Editor the surface. Engagement meant understanding Israel’s importance to the world Jewish community as well as its right to exist — both in a general sense and in relation to the Yakov Wisniewski events of the day. This often turned engagement into a reactive enterprise — how the commu- Design Director nity could shore up support for this policy or for that war, and how Israel’s actions could best be presented and explained. THE STEINHARDT The reasons for this were understandable. There was a widespread perception of Israel being FOUNDATION under siege and a general sentiment that Diaspora communities could serve as Israel’s ambassa- FOR JEWISH LIFE dors. Moreover, a fear of losing young Jews to waves of anti-Israel agitation spurred campaigns to arm them with Israel’s side of the story. But ultimately, such efforts were a misuse of both Michael H. Steinhardt Israel and of American Jews. As the conflict became more nuanced and information more wide- Chairman spread, the Hasbarah method — explaining Israel through public relations — came to be dis- Robert P. Aronson credited by a more sophisticated population of American Jews, particularly among the younger President generations.
    [Show full text]
  • JEWISH FronIer
    JEWISH Fronier WAR & PEACE ISRAEL'S in he Middle Eas IDENTITY PROBLEMS SOLDIER of PEACE The YITZHAK RABIN Sory Geaway o he CHANNEL ISLANDS' HANAN AYALTI s Legacy LIKUD & LABOR The Differences S I N C E 1 9 3 4 A LABOR ZIONIST JOURNAL JEWISH CONTENTSVol. LXV, No . 2 (631) MARCH/APRIL 1998 Fronier Israel 3 SINCE 1934 WAR & PEACE IN THE A LABOR ZIONIST JOURNAL MIDDLE EAST Susan Hais Rolef 6 Misha Louvish Founders IDENTITY PROBLEMS Hayim Greenberg LABOR AND LIKUD : The Difference 8 Marie Syrkin Commenary 10 AGAIN A "FINAL SOLUTION"? Henry L. Feingold Ediorial Board SHARETT CENTER 12 Henry Feingold, Chairman RENEWS ACTIVITIES Saul B . Cohen Hyman Faine Books 13 Jonahan J . Goldberg SOLDIER OF PEACE: Emanuel S . Goldsmih YITZHAK RABIN, by Dan Kurzman Joseph Adler Jerry Goodman Rabbi Mark W. Kiel THE PRESENCE IS IN EXILE, TOO, 30 Chava Lapin by Hanan J . Ayali Jeffry V. Mallow Daniel Mann News Briefs 15 Mordecai Newman Samuel Norich A Novel 16 Michael S . Perry ALTNEULAND Theodor Herzl Mark Raider Eduardo Rauch Noebook 17 Mordecai Shrigler Ezra Spicehandler FANTASTIC JOURNEY Nahum Guman Phyllis Suker David Twersky Biography 21 HANAN AYALTI David Rosenhal 24 Nahum Guman MOSES HESS AND HIS TIMES Mary Schulman Edior Travel 28 SOME GETAWAY! Haim Cherok Leers 30 NOTE TO SUBSCRIBERS If you plan o move, please noify SOL STEIN AT 92 31 us six weeks in advance . Conribuors 20 JEWISH FRONTIER (ISSN-0021-6453) is published bi-monhly by Labor Zionis JEWISH FRONTIER Leers, Inc. Ediorial and adverising offices a 275 Sevenh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 .
    [Show full text]
  • Working Class
    A NEW WORKING CLASS Students for a Democratic Society and the United Auto Workers in the Sixties Amanda L. Bullock A NEW WORKING CLASS: Students for a Democratic Society and the United Auto Workers in the Sixties by Amanda Leigh Bullock A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelors of the Arts with Honors Department of History University of Michigan March 27, 2006 Advised by: Professor Matthew D. Lassiter © 2006 Amanda Leigh Bullock TABLE OF C ONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS II INTRODUCTION: STUDENTS, MIDDLE AMERICANS, AND CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS 1 DEMOCRATIC DISSENT 4 HISTORIOGRAPHY 7 CHAPTER ONE: NATURAL ALLIES? 15 THE LEAGUE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY 17 THE PORT HURON STATEMENT: “AN AGENDA FOR A GENERATION” 19 THE “OLD” LEFT 23 THE NEW LEFT: THE NATURAL ALLIANCE OF THE LABOR AND CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENTS? 27 STUDENTS AND LABOR 30 AUTONOMY 36 CHAPTER TWO: THE WAR ON POVERTY AND THE NEW INSURGENCY 42 THE CITIZENS’ CRUSADE AGAINST POVERTY 46 INSURGENCY TO THE WAR ON POVERTY 53 FROM FAYETTE COUNTY TO THE GHETTO 56 “AN INTERRACIAL MOVEMENT OF THE POOR” 60 THE FAILURE OF ERAP 67 FAILURE: THE CAMPUS VERSUS THE COMMUNITY 67 FAILURE: THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT 71 FAILURE: THE ESCALATION OF THE VIETNAM WAR 73 THE LEGACY OF THE ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND ACTION PROJECT 75 CHAPTER THREE: IMPLOSION 79 THE ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT: SDS OUTGROWS ITSELF 81 STUDENTS FOR A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY’S 1968 WORK-IN 90 THE 1968 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION 94 THE DEATH OF SDS 101 THE TROUBLED AMERICANS 106 PRIMARY SOURCES 113 BIBLIOGRAPHY 115 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I am indebted to Professor Matt Lassiter, without whose guidance and patience I never could have accomplished this.
    [Show full text]
  • What We've Been up To
    ערכים ליברלים ישראל פרוגרסיבית 2020-2021: WHAT WE’VE BEEN UP TO WHO ARE WE? Ameinu, Hebrew for “Our People,” is a national, multi-generational community of progressive Jews in North America. Recognizing the unbreakable bond between the Jewish people and Israel, as well as the commitment to make our own society better, we mobilize those Jews who seek opportunities to foster social and economic justice both in Israel and in North America. As Zionists, we understand that a secure peace between Israel and its neighbors is essential to the survival of a democratic Jewish state. With this in mind, we build support within the North American Jewish community for a negotiated two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Here is a short report about our most recent activities and programs, for more, please follow us on social media or visit our website: www.ameinu.net. 2020 WORLD ZIONIST CONGRESS - HATIKVAH SLATE Before 2020 even began, we worked with our partners in the U.S. progressive Israel community to construct the Hatikvah Slate. The Slate ran in the 2020 World Zionist Congress elections. From January to March we mobilized thousands of people to vote for our vision of peace and justice, while facing attempts by right wing forces to have our delegation disqualified from the Congress on bogus grounds. Their case was denied and we sent 30 delegates and alternates to the virtual Congress held in October. We formed a left-center coalition to block a power grab by the right-religious bloc of organizations, ensuring a balance in governance within international Zionist bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • February 3, 2021 Dear Member of Congress: the 79 Undersigned
    February 3, 2021 Dear Member of Congress: The 79 undersigned local, state, and national Jewish organizations write in strong support of the transformational democracy reform package the For the People Act (H.R. 1/S. 1), and urge you to prioritize its passage. As Jews, we are commanded tzedek, tzedek tirdof, to pursue justice. By enacting this bill, we can enhance integrity, fairness, and transparency in our nation’s elections, create a democracy that values all voices, and build a more just society. The 2020 election has underscored the urgent need for democracy reform, and the common- sense reforms in the For the People Act address many of these problems. This legislation aims to accomplish three overarching goals: (1) protecting and strengthening the sacred right to vote, (2) ending the dominance of big money in politics, and (3) implementing anti-corruption, pro- ethics measures to clean up government. Without structural democracy reform, our nation will remain unable to fully address important, substantive priorities, especially critical amid a pandemic, including protecting and expanding affordable health care, stopping the spread of COVID-19, and providing the assistance and support people need to care for themselves and their families. The reforms in the For the People Act are necessary to advance racial justice and ensure that our government works for all people, not just a powerful few. President Joe Biden has stated that a “first priority” of his administration is to lead on a comprehensive set of democracy solutions like those reflected in H.R. 1/S. 1. As such, we urge a vote on this bill as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Positive Sign from the Zionist Left
    A positive sign from the Zionist left Gerald Steinberg Thursday, October 10, 2013 Ameinu, a Jewish organization that supports “progressive causes in Israel,” has taken a refreshing and long- overdue step in naming, shaming and pushing back against hard- core anti- Zionists. In a publication titled The Third Narrative: Progressive Answers to the Far Left’s Critiques of Israel, Ameinu condemns the “relentless barrage of accusations against Israel on the web, on campus and in other settings.” This notably harsh language is fully justified. For many years, liberal values and moral causes have been exploited for immoral political warfare against Israel, including boycott campaigns and false accusations of “apartheid.” Fundamental principles such as human rights, peace, and democracy are cynically abused in distinctly anti- progressive and anti- liberal attacks that demonize Israel as the nation- state of the Jewish People. Ameinu’s counter- offensive is particularly important for Jewish students who are naturally sympathetic to the language and appeal of social justice, but have little knowledge of the history and facts, and are easily brainwashed. Many well- intentioned liberals are taken in by a well- financed network of self- proclaimed human rights groups obsessed with hatred of Israel, and by marginal individuals who misappropriate the Jewish framework of “tikkun olam” (repairing the world). The discredited Goldstone report, published in 2009, whose false claims caused major damage, demonstrated the destructive influence of this network of non- governmental organizations (NGOs). The radical anti- Zionist left also promotes what is euphemistically referred to as a “bi- national solution,” and invents legal arguments, such as a “right of return” for millions of Palestinians who claim refugee status.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is No “Status Quo” Drivers of Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    THERE IS NO “STATUS QUO” DRIVERS OF VIOLENCE IN THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT NATHAN STOCK AUGUST 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher. Copyright © 2019 The Middle East Institute The Middle East Institute 1763 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Follow MEI: @MiddleEastInst /MiddleEastInstitute There is No “Status Quo” Drivers of Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Nathan Stock iv | About the author nathan stock Nathan Stock is a non-resident scholar at the Middle East Institute. Prior to joining MEI he spent nine years working for former President Carter’s organization, The Carter Center. He served in the Center’s Conflict Resolution Program, out of Atlanta, GA, before moving to Jerusalem to run the Center’s Israel-Palestine Field Office. Stock led Carter Center efforts to facilitate the reunification of the Palestinian political system and to assert Palestinian sovereignty via international fora. He designed and managed projects targeting the Fatah-Hamas conflict, and implemented programming to monitor and advance political solutions to the Syrian civil war. Prior to joining the Center, Stock worked in Afghanistan on a USAID-funded grant to strengthen local civil society organizations. During the Al-Aqsa Intifada, he lived in the Gaza Strip, working with a Palestinian NGO to design and fundraise for conflict resolution programs targeting the Palestinian community.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Sociology: the Dominant Paradigm Author(S): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol
    Media Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm Author(s): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Sep., 1978), pp. 205-253 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657009 Accessed: 30/11/2009 07:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theory and Society. http://www.jstor.org 205 MEDIA SOCIOLOGY: The Dominant Paradigm TODD GITLIN Since the Second WorldWar, as mass media in the United States have become more concentratedin ownership,more centralizedin operations,more national in reach, more pervasivein presence,sociological study of the media has been dominated by the theme of the relative powerlessnessof the broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • ERAP and the LID-SDS Conflict
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1992 Reviving the American Left: ERAP and the LID-SDS Conflict Michael Patrick Bartos College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bartos, Michael Patrick, "Reviving the American Left: ERAP and the LID-SDS Conflict" (1992). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625764. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-bsmk-yn11 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reviving the American Left: ERAP and the LID-SDS Conflict A Thesis presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Arts by Michael P. Bartos 1992 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Michael P. Bartos Approved, December 1992 Edward P. d&rapol Q ,_^ J J&, Phi 1 ip 'J. /Funigie 1 Ip/ Richard* B. Sherman ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT..................................................... iv INTRODUCTION...................................................2 CHAPTER I. SDS-LID RELATIONSHIP BEFORE ERAP.................... 5 CHAPTER II. THE ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND ACTIONPROJECT .......... 21 CHAPTER III. ELEMENTS OF THE OLD LEFT REJECTED BY ERAP........
    [Show full text]