DOCSLIB.ORG

Equity and Other Variable-Income Securities Listed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equity and Other Variable-Income Securities Listed Welcome Address Bjorgolfur Gudmundsson Chairman Landsbanki’s Profile & Halldor J. Kristjansson Strategic Objectives Group Managing Director & CEO Landsbanki’s Financial Sigurjón Þ. Árnason Group Managing Director & CEO Results 2005 Landsbanki’s International Brynjolfur Helgason Managing Director Int. Banking & Alternate Operations CEO Landsbanki’s Profile and Halldór J. Kristjánsson Strategic Objectives Group Managing Director & CEO 1 Landsbanki – A Changing Group 2 Managing Risk in a Growing Economy 3 Strategy and Objectives A Growing North European Bank Creation of a pan-European platform to further Moody's expand on Landsbanki´s products and services Long Term A2 - Teather & Greenwood Short Term P-1 - Kepler Equities Outlook Stable Bank Financial Strength C - Merrion Capital Subordinated Debt A3 Operations in 12 countries covering all major financial centers of Europe, as well as Jr Subordinated Baa1 representation in New York and Canada. Latest Review Feb 2005 Ratings Upgraded: A2 from A3 March 2005 Continued success and profitability of all Landsbanki franchises, including operations in Northern Europe and strong footing in domestic Fitch market Long Term A A record year in capital market funding activities Short Term F1 Strengthening of Capital Base Individual B/C Support 2 Credit Ratings Improved Outlook Stable Latest Review June 2005 Ratings Upgraded: B/C from C Nov 2005 Extensive Domestic and International Operations Iceland – HQ & home market Core Income by Location* - A universal bank offering a full range of financial products and services 2003 2005 - Most extensive branch network with 46 branches 4% 5% UK & Ireland 16% - London, Edinburgh and Dublin Mainland Europe - France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, Italy, 19% Spain and Luxembourg 65% N-America & Canada 91% - Offices in NY and Halifax Lending by Location Iceland UK / Ireland Continental Europe 14.000 Market Share in Iceland 2005 2002 12.000 35% Deposits 31% 27% 10.000 Lending 33% 26% Foreign 8.000 Equity Trading 35% 19% Iceland 6.000 Fixe d Incom e 23% 19% 22% Corporate Advisory 40 - 50% 7% 4.000 Mutual Funds 34% 31% 2.000 FX Trading 42- 45% 40 - 43% 0 Suppl. pension savings 25% 18% 2003 2005 *Excluding trading gains. Subsidiaries pro forma on a full year basis Top Nordic Banks (by market capitalisation 25 .0 0 0 0 20 4 1 .0 . 0 0 23 15 .0 0 0 3 9 .2 10 18 .0 0 0 5. 0 0 0 394 13. 531 0 12. 71 .4 12 Nordea 7 3 .0 ) Danske Bank 12 Handelsbanken 110 DnB NOR 9. 3 3 0 SEB 8. Swedbank 652 Sampo 5. Kaupthing 152 4. € m 1 0 illion SKandia 8 3. Landsbanki 700 2. Íslandsbanki 7 7 5 2. Straumur-Burdarás 504 2. Jyske Bank 477 OKO Bank 1. Sydbank 948 Carnegie 6 65 Spar Nord 1 Landsbanki – A Changing Group 2 Managing Risk in a Growing Economy 3 Strategy and Objectives Economic Outlook Positive - In Iceland and Abroad China and Asia lead the upswing GDP growth 1995-2006 GDP growth picking up in Europe 8% - Expansion of Icelandic companies abroad will Average 1995-2004 continue 2005 - Growth opportunity for Landsbanki's European 2006 platforms 6% Outlook for continuing high GDP growth in Iceland through 2010 4% - Likelihood of additional power-intensive industrial projects has increased - Public authorities considering major developments 2% - Good employment situation will continue, with record-high purchasing power - Better equilibrium developing on the real estate 0% market, reducing inflationary pressure Euroland UK OECD Iceland Ireland Source: OECD, Ministry of Finance Excellent Performance of the Equity Market Equity indices The success of Icelandic business and industry is Equity indices in Europe and the US reflected in equity market developments Listed companies raised around ISK 350 billion on the Iceland Stock Exchange (ICEX) - ISK 227 billion through bond and bill issuance - ISK 123 billion by issuing new share capital ICEX-15 index rose by 64.7% For the most part, share price increases have been as a result of increased profitability P/E ratios for 2006 15.9 15.9 16.2 16.2 14.6 The P/E ratio of ICEX-listed companies is currently 13.4 13.7 around 15.9 as compared to 15.9-16.2 for companies on European markets While equities are priced on the high side, there are no signs of a price bubble UK Germany Sweden Ireland France Iceland Finland Source: Bloomberg, Landsbanki Research Continued Internationalisation & Diversification of the Icelandic Economy FDI and portfolio capital owned abroad by residents Strong growth of FDI and Portfolio € billion 12 capital abroad – 90% of GDP 2005 10 Portfolio capital Firm resolve by Alcan, Alcoa and 8 Foreign direct investment Century Aluminium to further 6 expand in Iceland 4 2 - Foreign investment lead growth 0 will continue through 2010 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005e Source: The Central Bank of Iceland - Annual GDP growth expected to FDI as % of GDP continue to exceed OECD average 40% until 2010 Inward investment Outw ard investment Continued growth underpinned by 24% strong inward and outward FDI 15% 9% 3% 4% 1997 2003 2006e Source: Economist Intelligence Unit, Landsbanki estimates for Iceland Diversification of Corporate Earnings Cash Flow of Listed Companies Operations of the largest companies listed on ICEX are predominantly international Assets of Icelandic banks are primarily 25% foreign currency denominated 75% - Over 50% of local lending is foreign currency denominated ISK Foreign Currencies - 30 – 70% of total bank assets are employed in foreign operations Sources of Continued Growth Growing pension funds which are fully - Above 75% of total bank assets are in funded foreign currency Icelandic entrepreneurs with successful About 75% of cash flow of listed international investments companies is in foreign currencies Capital gains from privatisation, restructuring and M&A Successful exits from established sectors have created wealth Centralised Risk Management Credit limits for the group managed through Landsbanki’s centralised Credit Committee - Market Risk positions for the Group are managed through the banks ALCO committee - Market risk may not exceed 15% of its total risk-weighted asset base. - Market risk assessment and control is done through Head Office Risk is actively managed, assessed and controlled centrally at group level Emphasis on consolidated measurements, controls and reporting Management of Key Risk Factors Credit Risk – responsible loan growth Equity exposure as % of Total Assets - Iceland’s largest and strongest companies (35%) - Foreign portfolio (40%) - Retail in Iceland and some in UK are in large part 6,0% mortgages where substantial portion of portfolio has 4,0% been hedged (25%) The level of equity risk as the predominant market 2,0% risk factor has remained constant 0,0% Equity exposure has shifted from domestic to 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 foreign equities (15% Æ 47%) Underlying good growth in fees and commission – Equity Exposure Portfolio operations acquired in 2005 are principally fee- Domestic vs. Foreign based operations 100% 80% Emphasis on broader funding sources 60% For eign Deposits currently fund 2/3 of London banking - 40% Domest ic operations and growing 20% - Increased access to securitization - part of London 0% operations already funded through securitisation 2003 2004 2005 Fully Capitalised Against Adverse Market Developments Last year Landsbanki strengthened it’s capital base considerably and can withstand adverse Borrowers of Foreign Currency movements in capital markets. The regulator’s stress test assumes simultaneous Individuals Companies adverse market developments 2% with partial hedge - 25% fall in equity prices, 20% loss of NPL and 12% 7% fall in bond prices - Application of the test and adding 25% depreciation of ISK markets affects CAR by about 2,5%, from 13,1% to 10,6% Stress test of lending portfolio where equity is collateral or underlying hedge, confirms ability to withstand considerable adverse development Companies with currency Adverse developments in FX markets has a limited hedge effect on customers – majority of borrowers of 86% foreign currency loans are hedged against currency Exposures 1 Landsbanki – A Changing Group 2 Managing Risk in a Growing Economy 3 Strategy & Objectives Overall Strategy & Objectives Domestic Strategy To reinforce and build upon Landsbanki’s position as the leading provider of universal financial services to households, corporations and institutional investors, based on long-term business relationships International Strategy Using the expertise and resources of the domestic universal bank to create Corporate Inv. a profitable international bank with strong corporate and investment banking banking emphasis and present in such major financial centers that support the overall strategy Continue organic growth in international banking operations and acquire Banking low-risk banking assets that increase stable, recurring revenue streams operations -Diversification of risk and greater economies of scale -Positive impact on credit ratings -Improved access to markets International Corporate Investment Banking operations - Overview Institutional Sales, Trading and Market Making Corporate Brokerage Corporate Finance Advisory Equity Research Pan European Investment trusts and Closed-End Funds corporate investment banking services Structured Lending Cross-border Corporate Advisory Asset Backed Lending Deposits Strategic Brand and product harmonization while preserving individual identity and specialty Priorities Strategic co-operation and consolidation of operational platforms 2006 Add additional corporate advisory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit-Guarantee Schemes – Obligation of Result – Emanation of the State – Discrimination)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 28 January 2013 (Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes – Obligation of result – Emanation of the State – Discrimination) In Case E-16/11, EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Xavier Lewis, Director, and Gjermund Mathisen, Officer, Department of Legal & Executive Affairs, acting as Agents, applicant, supported by the European Commission, represented by its Agents Enrico Traversa, Albert Nijenhuis and Karl-Philipp Wojcik, intervener, v Iceland, represented by Kristján Andri Stefánsson, Agent, Tim Ward QC, Lead counsel, Jóhannes Karl Sveinsson, Co-counsel, defendant, APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing to ensure payment of the minimum amount of compensation to Icesave depositors in the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom provided for in Article 7(1) of the Act referred to at point 19a of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes) within the time limits laid down in Article 10 of the Act, Iceland has failed to comply with the obligations resulting from that Act, in particular its Articles 3, 4, 7 and 10, and/or Article 4 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area. – 2 – THE COURT, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge Rapporteur, Páll Hreinsson, and Ola Mestad (ad hoc), Judges, Registrar: Gunnar Selvik, - having regard to the written pleadings of the parties and the intervener and the written observations of the Principality of Liechtenstein, represented
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland's Financial Crisis
    Iceland’s Financial Crisis A Global Crisis • The current economic turmoil in Iceland is part of a complex global financial crisis and is by no means an isolated event. • Governments around the world have introduced emergency measures to protect their financial system and rescue their banks, as they suffer from a severe liquidity shortage. • Thus far, Iceland has been hit particularly hard by this unprecedented financial storm due to the large size of the banking sector in comparison to the overall economy. • The Icelandic Government has taken measures and is working hard to resolve the situation, both independently and in cooperation with other parties. • Iceland is cooperating with its Nordic and European partners and is currently consulting with the IMF on measures toward further stabilization of the Icelandic economy. 1 Bank Liquidity Tightens • The liquidity position of Icelandic banks tightened significantly in late September and early October as interbank markets froze following the collapse of Lehman Brothers. • The nationalization of Glitnir, one of Iceland’s three major banks, on Sept. 29 th , led to a credit rating downgrade on sovereign debt and that of all the major banks. • This led to further deterioration of liquidity. • Early October, all three banks were suffering from a severe liquidity shortage and in dire need for Central Bank emergency funding. Negative coverage on the Icelandic economy, particularly in the U.K, did not help either. • By mid-October, all three banks, Glitnir, Landsbanki and Kaupthing, had been taken over by the government on the basis of a new emergency law. • The banks had become too large to rescue.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    September 2014 turnarounds & Workouts 7 Special Report European Restructuring Practices of Major U.S. Law Firms, page 1 Firm Senior Professionals Representative Clients Bingham McCutchen James Roome Elisabeth Baltay Creditors of: Arcapita Bank, Bulgaria Telecommunications/Vivacom, Crest +44.20.7661.5300 Barry G. Russell Liz Osborne Nicholson, Dannemora Minerals, DEPFA Bank, Findus Foods, Gala Coral, www.bingham.com James Terry Neil Devaney Icelandic Banks (Kaupthing, Glitnir and Landsbanki), Invitel, Klöckner Stephen Peppiatt Emma Simmonds Pentaplast, Media Works, Northland Resources, Oceanografia, OSX3 Leasing Tom Bannister B.V., Petromena, Petroplus, Preem, Punch Taverns, Royal Imtech, Selecta, Sevan Marine, Skeie Drilling, Straumur, Technicolor S.A. (Thomson S.A.), Terreal, The Quinn Group, Uralita, Wind Hellas, Xcite, and others. Cadwalader, Wickersham Gregory Petrick Louisa Watt Centerbridge Partners, Avenue Capital Group, GSO Capital Partners, & Taft Richard Nevins Paul Dunbar Oaktree Capital Management, Varde Partners, Golden Tree Asset +44 (0) 20 7170 8700 Yushan Ng Karen McMaster Management, Bluebay Asset Management, MBIA, Davidson Kempner, www.cadwalader.com Holly Neavill Alexis Kay Outrider Management, GLG Partners, Warwick Capital, Alchemy, Finnisterre Capital. Davis Polk Donald S. Bernstein Timothy Graulich Lehman Brothers International (Europe) and its U.K. Lehman affiliates, +44 20 7418 1300 Karen E. Wagner Elliot Moskowitz Sterling Equities in Madoff SIPA liquidation, Technicolor S.A., Royal www.davispolk.com Andrés V. Gil Thomas J. Reid Imtech, Carrefour, major global banks and financial institutions in Arnaud Pérès Christophe Perchet connection with several monoline insurance company restructurings, Marshall S. Huebner John Banes Goldman Sachs in connection with exposures to BP, Castle HoldCo 4, Benjamin S. Kaminetzky Reuven B.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized IN TiUS ISSUE The Great American Motor Rallye •...............•... Meet a Foreigner . .. Christma~ Cocktail Party Pictures. ............... Public Disclosure Authorized The following statement was made by Mr. Andrew N. Overby at the last Executive Directors' meeting in 1955. We think his words are most fitting as a thought for the New Year. "Mr. Chairman: "This, I believe. will be the last meeting of the year. and I think it is appropriate at this time not only to extend to the management and staff of the Bank the Board's Christmas greetings. but also their deep appreciation. of the work and able and efficient discharge of duty on behalf of the staff• . They wish also to pay tribute to the leadership of the management of the Bank which has taken us through another difficult year and. we think, without running afoul of too many rocks, and has taken us into some new and perhaps even interesting horizons lying ahead of us. "So with those words. we expres~ our appreciation, as well as our Christmas greetings to you and all the members of the staff, sir." CHRISTMAS CARDS RE<:;EIVED BY THE BANK, 1955 The First National Ciiy Bank of Caisse d'Epargne de L 'Etat, New York Luxembourg Amsterdamsche Bank The Workers' Bank Ltd., Israel Governor of the Bank of Greece Landsbanki Islands La Asociacion Mexicana de Caminos Central Hidroelectrica del Rio Federal Reserve Bank of New York Anchicaya, Limitada,. Colombia Bank of the Ryukyus Comptoir National d'Escompte de Banque de France Paris Industrial Development Bank of The Trust Company of Cuba Turkey Central Office of Information, Malta Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY INSIGHT No. 44 JANUJANUARY 2010
    abcd a POLICY INSIGHT No. 44 JANUJANUARY 2010 The saga of Icesave Jon Danielsson London School of Economics The President of Iceland has refused to sign a parlia- • Strong likelihood of state support in the event of mentary bill agreeing to compensate the governments systemic shock of the UK and Netherlands for deposit insurance pay- • Good financial fundamentals outs because of Icesave. This does not mean a rejection • Good efficiency levels of the country's obligations, nor any form of default. • Diversification of income On the contrary, the decision by the president stems • Capable credit risk management and good qual- from the fact that over 70% of Icelanders find the terms ity loan portfolios of the current deal unreasonable. • Adequate capitalisation • Prudent liquidity management Origin of the problem This coincided with one of the biggest asset bubbles the Iceland has traditionally had limited experience with world has ever seen, where anybody taking a highly international banking (Buiter and Sibert 2008). The leveraged bet was assured outsized profits. Eventually, financial system was highly regulated and politicised, the balance sheet of the banks swelled to 10 times the with the bulk of the system in government hands and GDP of Iceland. (See Danielsson and Zoega 2009). insulated from the outside world with capital controls until 1994. This all changed with the deregulation and So what is Icesave? privatisation of the financial system. Iceland adopted a new regulatory structure, in line with EU regulations, The Iceland banks started experiencing increasing prob- because of its European Economic Area membership. lems raising funds in international capital markets in Importantly, this meant that Icelandic banks could 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaupthing Bank
    Kaupthing Bank - COMPANY UPDATE - HOLD Rating Summary and Conclusions Equity value 223,7 bn.ISK Kaupthing Bank acquires FIH Price 407,9 Kaupthing Bank (KB banki) has reached an agreement with Forenings Sparbanken (Swedbank) to Closing price 23.06.2004 429,5 purchase FI Holding, the holding company of the Danish corporate bank FIH. The purchase price amounts to ISK 84 billion (EUR 1,000 million), in addition to which Swedbank will retain part of Contents FIH's own equity. The acquisition will be financed with the issue of new share capital to holders of pre-emptive rights, as well as through subordinated debt. The price-to-book ratio for the Summary and Conclusions.........................................................1 transaction is 1.6. Kaupthing Bank acquires FIH....................................................2 Payment..................................................................................2 FIH is the third-largest bank in Danmark, with total assets close to ISK 800 bn at the end of Q1. It Financing.........................................................................2 was established in 1954 by the Danish state to encourage growth and development of Danish FIH...............................................................................................2 industry. FIH's activities are almost exclusively corporate lending. It holds a 17% share of the Danish Effect on group operations and value...................................3 corporate market and has around 5,000 customers, half of whom have been dealing with the
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Government Interventions United Kingdom
    21 April 2009 Summary of Government Interventions United Kingdom Overview Beginning in April 2008 and accelerating from there on, the UK began taking numerous and substantial actions in order to combat the economic downturn. Amongst the most important measures enacted by the UK are: • Bank Recapitalisations; • Credit Guarantee Scheme; • Bank of England Liquidity Provisions; • Guarantee Scheme for Asset-Backed Securities; • Bank of England Asset Purchase Facility, and • Asset Protection Scheme. In addition to the above measures, the UK has enacted several other significant measures that will also be discussed below. Investments/recapitalisation Bank Recapitalisation Scheme On 8 October 2008, the UK announced several significant measures (the “Initial Stability Measures”) to provide financial stability to the economy by ensuring that banks and building societies in the UK had sufficient access to (i) short-term liquidity, (ii) new capital and (iii) funds for medium-term lending. Of the Initial Stability Measures, the UK’s scheme (the “Bank Recapitalisation Scheme”) to help banks increase the level of their tier 1 capital above the regulatory requirements was arguably the most significant. Under the Bank Recapitalisation Scheme, the UK sought and obtained the commited participation of many of the largest UK banks and building societies (specifcally, Abbey, Barclays, HBOS, HSBC Bank, Lloyds TSB, Nationwide Building Society, RBS and Standard Chartered), however the scheme is available to any “eligible insitution” (which are UK incorporated banks (including UK subsidiaries of foreign institutions) that have substantial business in the UK and building societies). The participating institutions agreed that they would increase their aggregate tier 1 capital by GBP 25bn.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining the Financial Stability of UK Banks: Update on the Support Schemes Our Vision Is to Help the Nation Spend Wisely
    REPOrt BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 676 SESSION 2010–2011 15 DECEMBER 2010 HM Treasury Maintaining the financial stability of UK banks: update on the support schemes Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. We apply the unique perspective of public audit to help Parliament and government drive lasting improvement in public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending on behalf of Parliament. The Comptroller and Auditor General, Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons. He is the head of the National Audit Office which employs some 900 staff. He and the National Audit Office are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide range of other public sector bodies; and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. Our work leads to savings and other efficiency gains worth many millions of pounds: £890 million in 2009-10. HM Treasury Maintaining the financial stability of UK banks: update on the support schemes Ordered by the House of Commons This report has been to be printed on 14 December 2010 prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General 1983 for presentation to HC 676 Session 2010–2011 the House of Commons 15 December 2010 in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. London: The Stationery Office £14.75 Amyas Morse Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 13 December 2010 Our December 2009 report Maintaining financial stability across the United Kingdom’s banking system provided a summary of the actions the Treasury took to support the UK banks through the financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • • the EFTA Court Pronounced Its Judgment on the Icesave Case
    Icesave: A farewell to uncertainty The EFTA court pronounced its judgment on the Icesave case yesterday. The court dismissed all pleas brought by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, and the ruling represented an outright victory for Iceland. Of the thirteen court cases brought by ESA against Iceland on behalf of EFTA through 2011, this is the first time that Iceland has emerged victorious. This eliminates all uncertainty associated with the resolution of the Icesave dispute in the last few years, which has, as we will see below, been damaging to the Icelandic economy. We expect the judgment to have a positive effect on the domestic economy. Icesave: A farewell to uncertainty The EFTA court pronounced its judgment on the Icesave case yesterday. The court dismissed all pleas brought by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, and the ruling represented an outright victory for Iceland. Of the thirteen court cases brought by ESA against Iceland on behalf of EFTA through 2011, this is the first time that Iceland has emerged victorious. This eliminates all uncertainty associated with the resolution of the Icesave dispute in the last few years, which has, as we will see below, been damaging to the Icelandic economy. This was a declaratory judgment in which the court ruled on the following points: 1) The violation of the EEA agreement by the Icelandic deposit guarantee fund. The court was of the opinion that the Icelandic authorities did not contravene the deposit guarantee directive by not ensuring that Icesave depositors were paid from the depositors’ and investors' guarantee fund (TIF) no later than 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 Icelandic Bank Collapse: Foreign Factors
    The 2008 Icelandic Bank Collapse: Foreign Factors A Report for the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs Centre for Political and Economic Research at the Social Science Research Institute University of Iceland Reykjavik 19 September 2018 1 Summary 1. An international financial crisis started in August 2007, greatly intensifying in 2008. 2. In early 2008, European central banks apparently reached a quiet consensus that the Icelandic banking sector was too big, that it threatened financial stability with its aggressive deposit collection and that it should not be rescued. An additional reason the Bank of England rejected a currency swap deal with the CBI was that it did not want a financial centre in Iceland. 3. While the US had protected and assisted Iceland in the Cold War, now she was no longer considered strategically important. In September, the US Fed refused a dollar swap deal to the CBI similar to what it had made with the three Scandinavian central banks. 4. Despite repeated warnings from the CBI, little was done to prepare for the possible failure of the banks, both because many hoped for the best and because public opinion in Iceland was strongly in favour of the banks and of businessmen controlling them. 5. Hedge funds were active in betting against the krona and the banks and probably also in spreading rumours about Iceland’s vulnerability. In late September 2008, when Glitnir Bank was in trouble, the government decided to inject capital into it. But Glitnir’s major shareholder, a media magnate, started a campaign against this trust-building measure, and a bank run started.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008
    Financial Sanctions Notice 17 October 2008 The Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008 Her Majesty’s Treasury issue this Notice to provide further guidance in relation to the Landsbanki Freezing Order 20081 (‘the Order’). Outline 1. This guidance provides further information about the effect of the Order. It should be read in its entirety by anyone with concerns about a particular transaction. However, some general points should be noted. 2. The Order is specific to Landsbanki and does not freeze the funds of any other Icelandic banks. It does not affect Icelandic companies with no links to Landsbanki. 3. The Order was made on 8 October 2008 because of the Treasury’s concerns that action to the detriment of the UK economy (or part of it) had been taken or was likely to be taken by certain persons, namely Landsbanki Islands hf. (‘Landsbanki’) and certain Authorities and the Government of Iceland involved in taking decisions in relation to Landsbanki. Its purpose is to help safeguard the UK economy by freezing assets of Landsbanki in the UK. 4. This action was deemed necessary because the emergency nationalisation law passed in Iceland on 7 October 20082 meant that UK creditors' rights could be prejudiced compared with other creditors. The Icelandic government had been unable to clarify the position of UK creditors in the administration process and there was therefore a threat to UK economic interests. 5. Freezing provisions: The Order places a freeze on funds owned, held or controlled by Landsbanki and funds relating to Landsbanki owned, held or controlled by certain Icelandic authorities and its Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Financial System Ten Years After the Financial Crisis: Lessons Learnt1
    The Financial System Ten Years After The Financial 1 Crisis: Lessons Learnt 25 September 2018 Willem H. Buiter Introduction If I were to take the last two words of the title -“Lessons Learnt”- literally, this would be a short note indeed, as it is my view that few lessons have been learnt and expressed in legal, regulatory and other institutional reforms, and of these few some were the wrong lessons. So I will extend the scope of the presentation to include lessons that ought to have been learnt but thus far have not been. (1) No-one saw it coming Almost every non-economist, including the Queen of England, and many economists have expressed surprise at the fact that few if any observers, including researchers, officials, politicians and financial market participants saw the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) coming. No- one got the timing, scope and magnitude of the crisis right, even among those who warned that a crisis would be coming (somewhere, sometime, somehow) and those who warned specifically about the risks associated with US housing finance, especially the securitization of subprime residential mortgages. As late as 17 May 2007, the then Chair of the Fed continued to play down the significance of the subprime mortgage crisis: “All that said, given the fundamental factors in place that should support the demand for housing, we believe the effect of the troubles in the subprime sector on the broader housing market will likely be limited, and we do not expect significant spillovers from the subprime market to the rest of the economy or to the financial system.
    [Show full text]