Appraisal of the Acceptability of Subtropical Rutaceous Plants for a Swallowtail Butterfly, Papilio Protenor Demetrius (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appraisal of the Acceptability of Subtropical Rutaceous Plants for a Swallowtail Butterfly, Papilio Protenor Demetrius (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) Appl. Entomol. Zool. 42 (1): 121–128 (2007) http://odokon.org/ Appraisal of the acceptability of subtropical rutaceous plants for a swallowtail butterfly, Papilio protenor demetrius (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) Mamoru CHACHIN, Keiichi HONDA* and Hisashi ÔMURA Department of Biofunctional Science and Technology, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University; Higashi- hiroshima 739–8528, Japan (Received 18 August 2006; Accepted 20 October 2006) Abstract A Rutaceae-feeding swallowtail butterfly, Papilio protenor demetrius, exploits only a few plant species as hosts in the field. We examined in detail the acceptability of five potential rutaceous hosts occurring in the subtropics for oviposit- ing females of a Hiroshima population of the butterfly. The plants tested were Citrus depressa, Toddalia asiatica, Evo- dia meliifolia, Melicope triphylla, and Murraya paniculata, which are distributed mainly in the Southwestern Islands of Japan, thus in allopatry with the butterfly. Female responses to the foliage, methanol extracts and partitioned frac- tions from these plants were assayed for the presence of oviposition stimulants and/or deterrents. The foliage of C. de- pressa and T. asiatica strongly stimulated egg-laying, whereas ovipositing females only marginally accepted E. meli- ifolia and Me. triphylla, and virtually rejected Mu. paniculata. Further experiments with methanol extracts and frac- tions derived from the respective plants revealed that both C. depressa and T. asiatica contained potent oviposition stimulant(s) particularly in the aqueous fractions, and that the aqueous fractions of E. meliifolia and Mu. paniculata, despite their poor or little acceptability, contained moderate and weak stimulant(s), respectively. However, certain volatile deterrent(s) seemed to be responsible for the rejection of Mu. paniculata by females. Me. triphylla appeared to have neither appreciable stimulant(s) nor deterrent(s). Larval survival on these plants was also recorded as an estimate of fitness. Larvae performed very well on C. depressa. Unexpectedly, however, larvae did not survive on T. asiatica at all, but successfully grew on E. meliifolia. Larvae altogether failed to grow on both Me. triphylla and Mu. paniculata, suggesting the involvement of antifeedant(s) and/or toxic substance(s) in those plants to which larvae were mal- adapted. Key words: Host selection; oviposition; larval performance; Papilio protenor demetrius; Rutaceae made on the basis of a reciprocal balance of posi- INTRODUCTION tive and negative inputs from the plant which are Most butterfly species are phytophagous and ultimately transmitted to the central nervous sys- usually utilize only a limited range of host plants in tem for further processing (Renwick and Chew, nature. Although the host range of an insect is de- 1994; Honda, 1995). Extensive investigations car- termined by a diversity of ecological, geographical, ried out during the last two decades have revealed physiological, and behavioral factors, the key ele- an array of stimulants and deterrents of plant origin ments underlying the host range determination are responsible for oviposition by butterflies and moths phytochemicals; stimuli evoked, in particular, by (Renwick and Chew, 1994; Honda, 1995, 2005; plant secondary metabolites which are thought to Nishida, 1995; Honda and Nishida, 1999). The have a significant effect on host utilization by her- most crucial phase of host assessment in butterflies bivores (e.g. Städler, 1992). It has been fully estab- is “drumming” on the leaf surface with foretarsi lished that phytophagous lepidopterans can detect endowed with gustatory sensila. The majority of specific plant chemicals, which they use to assess phytochemicals directly associated with host recog- the suitability of potential hosts, and the decision nition and discrimination by ovipositing females to accept a given plant by ovipositing females is are those characterized mostly as non-volatile *To whom correspondence should be addressed at: E-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.1303/aez.2007.121 121 122 M. CHACHIN et al. secondary metabolites (Honda, 2005). However, allowed to copulate in an outdoor cage (7 mϫ10 m, volatile compounds from host plants, in certain 3.5 m high). These were derived from laboratory cases, are also believed to stimulate egg-laying be- stock cultures originated from females collected in havior and thus promote egg deposition (Feeny et Higashihiroshima City (Hiroshima Prefecture). al., 1989). Larvae were reared on potted plants of Citrus spp. While papilionid butterflies are known to exploit (mainly C. natsudaidai) or F. ailanthoides at 25°C a wide range of plant families as hosts, most under a photoregime of 16L : 8D. Females were fed species of the genus Papilio exclusively utilize ru- with 15% aqueous sucrose solution once daily taceous plants, showing a differential use of allied throughout the experiments. plants depending on the species (Miller, 1987). De- Extraction and fractionation of plant materi- spite extensive work by many scientists, phyto- als. Young leaves of C. depressa, T. asiatica, E. chemical cues and sensory mechanisms regulating meliifolia, Me. triphylla, and Mu. paniculata col- host selection and host preference in these butter- lected in Okinawa Pref. (0.5–1 kg each) were ex- flies remain poorly understood. For a better under- tracted separately with methanol (4–8 l) at room standing of the physiochemical background of temperature for one month. Subsequent fractiona- present-day host utilization and host range evolu- tion of each extract was carried out according to tion in Papilio butterflies, further attempts are the method of Honda (1990), as outlined below. needed to investigate the chemical basis for differ- Each methanolic extract was concentrated in vacuo ential acceptance of potential host plants. below 50°C, and an aliquot of the whole concen- Papilio protenor is a specialist on the Rutaceae. trate, after being dispersed in water, was succes- P. protenor demetrius, a subspecies distributed sively partitioned with chloroform and isobutanol from the main island (Honshu) to the Amami Is- to give three fractions (one aqueous and two or- lands of Japan, utilizes several Citrus plants and a ganic fractions). The chloroform-soluble fraction few species of other genera (Fagara, Zanthoxylum, (Fr. 1) was stored in chloroform. The isobutanol- and Skimmia) as hosts. Another subspecies, P. pro- soluble fraction (Fr. 2) was evaporated to dryness tenor liukiuensis, inhabits more southerly regions, below 50°C, and the residue was re-dissolved in i.e. Okinawa and Yaeyama Islands, where many ru- methanol. The water-soluble fraction (Fr. 3) was taceous plants such as Murraya paniculata, Evodia dissolved in 50% aqueous methanol. All these frac- meliifolia, Fagara ailanthoides, Toddalia asiatica, tions were stored below 0°C until use. Fractions Citrus depressa, Melicope triphylla, Skimmia prepared from the respective plants will hereafter japonica var. lutchuensis, and Zanthoxylum ni- be abbreviated: Fr. 1 of C. depressa and Fr. 2 of T. tidum grow. We have previously reported on the asiatica, for instance, will be designated as Cd-1 affinity of P. protenor demetrius for four temperate and Ta-2, respectively. Concentrations of test sam- rutaceous plants occurring in Honshu; Citrus ples are all shown in % w/v. An initial extract and unshiu, Fagara ailanthoides, Phellodendron three partitioned fractions (Frs. 1–3) of a given amurense, and Orixa japonica (Honda and concentration prepared from the respective plants Hayashi, 1995a). This study of P. protenor were tested for their stimulatory or deterrent effect demetrius deals with a comparative appraisal of fe- on oviposition. male oviposition responses to and the suitability Bioassay for oviposition response. Behavioral for larval growth of five subtropical rutaceous bioassays were conducted by a method similar to plants, C. depressa, T. asiatica, E. meliifolia, Me. that reported previously (Honda, 1986), employing triphylla, and Mu. paniculata. In Japan, these are a green heart-shaped plastic plate (2–5 cm2) as a distributed in the Southwestern Islands, though E. leaf surrogate. Before testing, females were meliifolia is also found in Kyushu and Shikoku. screened daily to assess their responsiveness, and only those that showed positive responses to the fo- liage of C. natsudaidai (one of the major host MATERIALS AND METHODS plants of P. protenor demetrius; Honda, 1990) and Insects. Adults of P. protenor demetrius sub- negative responses to water alone (control) were jected to behavioral bioassays were 3- to 10-day- chosen. Appraisal of female responsiveness to each old gravid females, which had been hand-paired or sample was made basically in accordance with the Butterfly Host Selection 123 criteria given in previous papers (Honda et al., 1997; Nakayama et al., 2002): In each trial (sample presentation), the response of an individual was scored as 100% for actual egg-laying or equivalent behavior (trying to bring the ovipositor in contact with the underside of the leaf without egg de- position), 50% for half-curling the abdomen with continuous drumming (this behavior took place in- frequently), and 0% for drumming only with no positive response. Trials were replicated more than three times for each individual and the responses of an individual to a given sample were averaged. For all trials, merely alighting on ovipositional sub- Fig. 1. Oviposition responses (meanϮSE) of P. protenor strates without drumming was not
Recommended publications
  • Known Host Plants of Huanglongbing (HLB) and Asian Citrus Psyllid
    Known Host Plants of Huanglongbing (HLB) and Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina Liberibacter citri Plant Name asiaticus Citrus Huanglongbing Psyllid Aegle marmelos (L.) Corr. Serr.: bael, Bengal quince, golden apple, bela, milva X Aeglopsis chevalieri Swingle: Chevalier’s aeglopsis X X Afraegle gabonensis (Swingle) Engl.: Gabon powder-flask X Afraegle paniculata (Schum.) Engl.: Nigerian powder- flask X Atalantia missionis (Wall. ex Wight) Oliv.: see Pamburus missionis X X Atalantia monophylla (L.) Corr.: Indian atalantia X Balsamocitrus dawei Stapf: Uganda powder- flask X X Burkillanthus malaccensis (Ridl.) Swingle: Malay ghost-lime X Calodendrum capense Thunb.: Cape chestnut X × Citroncirus webberi J. Ingram & H. E. Moore: citrange X Citropsis gilletiana Swingle & M. Kellerman: Gillet’s cherry-orange X Citropsis schweinfurthii (Engl.) Swingle & Kellerm.: African cherry- orange X Citrus amblycarpa (Hassk.) Ochse: djerook leemo, djeruk-limau X Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle: lime, Key lime, Persian lime, lima, limón agrio, limón ceutí, lima mejicana, limero X X Citrus aurantium L.: sour orange, Seville orange, bigarde, marmalade orange, naranja agria, naranja amarga X Citrus depressa Hayata: shiikuwasha, shekwasha, sequasse X Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck: see Citrus maxima X Citrus hassaku hort. ex Tanaka: hassaku orange X Citrus hystrix DC.: Mauritius papeda, Kaffir lime X X Citrus ichangensis Swingle: Ichang papeda X Citrus jambhiri Lushington: rough lemon, jambhiri-orange, limón rugoso, rugoso X X Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka: xiang
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus from Seed?
    Which citrus fruits will come true to type Orogrande, Tomatera, Fina, Nour, Hernandina, Clementard.) from seed? Ellendale Tom McClendon writes in Hardy Citrus Encore for the South East: Fortune Fremont (50% monoembryonic) “Most common citrus such as oranges, Temple grapefruit, lemons and most mandarins Ugli Umatilla are polyembryonic and will come true to Wilking type. Because most citrus have this trait, Highly polyembryonic citrus types : will mostly hybridization can be very difficult to produce nucellar polyembryonic seeds that will grow true to type. achieve…. This unique characteristic Citrus × aurantiifolia Mexican lime (Key lime, West allows amateurs to grow citrus from seed, Indian lime) something you can’t do with, say, Citrus × insitorum (×Citroncirus webberii) Citranges, such as Rusk, Troyer etc. apples.” [12*] Citrus × jambhiri ‘Rough lemon’, ‘Rangpur’ lime, ‘Otaheite’ lime Monoembryonic (don’t come true) Citrus × limettioides Palestine lime (Indian sweet lime) Citrus × microcarpa ‘Calamondin’ Meyer Lemon Citrus × paradisi Grapefruit (Marsh, Star Ruby, Nagami Kumquat Redblush, Chironja, Smooth Flat Seville) Marumi Kumquat Citrus × sinensis Sweet oranges (Blonde, navel and Pummelos blood oranges) Temple Tangor Citrus amblycarpa 'Nasnaran' mandarin Clementine Mandarin Citrus depressa ‘Shekwasha’ mandarin Citrus karna ‘Karna’, ‘Khatta’ Poncirus Trifoliata Citrus kinokuni ‘Kishu mandarin’ Citrus lycopersicaeformis ‘Kokni’ or ‘Monkey mandarin’ Polyembryonic (come true) Citrus macrophylla ‘Alemow’ Most Oranges Citrus reshni ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin Changshou Kumquat Citrus sunki (Citrus reticulata var. austera) Sour mandarin Meiwa Kumquat (mostly polyembryonic) Citrus trifoliata (Poncirus trifoliata) Trifoliate orange Most Satsumas and Tangerines The following mandarin varieties are polyembryonic: Most Lemons Dancy Most Limes Emperor Grapefruits Empress Tangelos Fairchild Kinnow Highly monoembryonic citrus types: Mediterranean (Avana, Tardivo di Ciaculli) Will produce zygotic monoembryonic seeds that will not Naartje come true to type.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA GRAS Assessment of Natural Flavor Complexes Citrus-Derived
    Food and Chemical Toxicology 124 (2019) 192–218 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food and Chemical Toxicology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchemtox FEMA GRAS assessment of natural flavor complexes: Citrus-derived T flavoring ingredients Samuel M. Cohena, Gerhard Eisenbrandb, Shoji Fukushimac, Nigel J. Gooderhamd, F. Peter Guengeriche, Stephen S. Hechtf, Ivonne M.C.M. Rietjensg, Maria Bastakih, ∗ Jeanne M. Davidsenh, Christie L. Harmanh, Margaret McGowenh, Sean V. Taylori, a Havlik-Wall Professor of Oncology, Dept. of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983135 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198- 3135, USA b Food Chemistry & Toxicology, Kühler Grund 48/1, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany c Japan Bioassay Research Center, 2445 Hirasawa, Hadano, Kanagawa, 257-0015, Japan d Dept. of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom e Dept. of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, 37232-0146, USA f Masonic Cancer Center, Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Cancer and Cardiovascular Research Building, 2231 6th St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA g Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, the Netherlands h Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association, 1101 17th Street, NW Suite 700, Washington, DC, 20036, USA i Scientific Secretary to the FEMA Expert Panel, 1101 17th Street, NW Suite 700, Washington, DC,20036,USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: In 2015, the Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) initiated a re-evaluation Citrus of the safety of over 250 natural flavor complexes (NFCs) used as flavoring ingredients. This publication isthe Natural flavor complex first in a series and summarizes the evaluation of54 Citrus-derived NFCs using the procedure outlined in Smith Botanical et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Known Host Plants of Huanglongbing (HLB) and Asian Citrus Psyllid
    Known Host Plants of Huanglongbing (HLB) and Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina Liberibacter citri Plant Name asiaticus Citrus Huanglongbing Psyllid Aegle marmelos (L.) Corr. Serr.: bael, Bengal quince, golden apple, bela, milva X Aeglopsis chevalieri Swingle: Chevalier’s aeglopsis X X Afraegle gabonensis (Swingle) Engl.: Gabon powder-flask X Afraegle paniculata (Schum.) Engl.: Nigerian powder- flask X Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.: jackfruit, jack, jaca, árbol del pan, jaqueiro X Atalantia missionis (Wall. ex Wight) Oliv.: see Pamburus missionis X X Atalantia monophylla (L.) Corr.: Indian atalantia X Balsamocitrus dawei Stapf: Uganda powder- flask X X Burkillanthus malaccensis (Ridl.) Swingle: Malay ghost-lime X Calodendrum capense Thunb.: Cape chestnut X × Citroncirus webberi J. Ingram & H. E. Moore: citrange X Citropsis gilletiana Swingle & M. Kellerman: Gillet’s cherry-orange X Citropsis schweinfurthii (Engl.) Swingle & Kellerm.: African cherry- orange X Citrus amblycarpa (Hassk.) Ochse: djerook leemo, djeruk-limau X Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle: lime, Key lime, Persian lime, lima, limón agrio, limón ceutí, lima mejicana, limero X X Citrus aurantium L.: sour orange, Seville orange, bigarde, marmalade orange, naranja agria, naranja amarga X Citrus depressa Hayata: shiikuwasha, shekwasha, sequasse X Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck: see Citrus maxima X Citrus hassaku hort. ex Tanaka: hassaku orange X Citrus hystrix DC.: Mauritius papeda, Kaffir lime X X Citrus ichangensis Swingle: Ichang papeda X Citrus jambhiri Lushington: rough lemon, jambhiri-orange, limón rugoso, rugoso X X Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka: xiang cheng, yuzu X Citrus kabuchi hort. ex Tanaka: this is not a published name; could they mean Citrus kinokuni hort. ex Tanaka, kishu mikan? X Citrus limon (L.) Burm.
    [Show full text]
  • Holdings of the University of California Citrus Variety Collection 41
    Holdings of the University of California Citrus Variety Collection Category Other identifiers CRC VI PI numbera Accession name or descriptionb numberc numberd Sourcee Datef 1. Citron and hybrid 0138-A Indian citron (ops) 539413 India 1912 0138-B Indian citron (ops) 539414 India 1912 0294 Ponderosa “lemon” (probable Citron ´ lemon hybrid) 409 539491 Fawcett’s #127, Florida collection 1914 0648 Orange-citron-hybrid 539238 Mr. Flippen, between Fullerton and Placentia CA 1915 0661 Indian sour citron (ops) (Zamburi) 31981 USDA, Chico Garden 1915 1795 Corsican citron 539415 W.T. Swingle, USDA 1924 2456 Citron or citron hybrid 539416 From CPB 1930 (Came in as Djerok which is Dutch word for “citrus” 2847 Yemen citron 105957 Bureau of Plant Introduction 3055 Bengal citron (ops) (citron hybrid?) 539417 Ed Pollock, NSW, Australia 1954 3174 Unnamed citron 230626 H. Chapot, Rabat, Morocco 1955 3190 Dabbe (ops) 539418 H. Chapot, Rabat, Morocco 1959 3241 Citrus megaloxycarpa (ops) (Bor-tenga) (hybrid) 539446 Fruit Research Station, Burnihat Assam, India 1957 3487 Kulu “lemon” (ops) 539207 A.G. Norman, Botanical Garden, Ann Arbor MI 1963 3518 Citron of Commerce (ops) 539419 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3519 Citron of Commerce (ops) 539420 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3520 Corsican citron (ops) 539421 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3521 Corsican citron (ops) 539422 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3522 Diamante citron (ops) 539423 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3523 Diamante citron (ops) 539424 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Greening Memo to NSY 9-14-05 For
    Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services CHARLES H. BRONSON, Commissioner The Capitol · Tallahassee, FL 32399-0800 Please Respond to: Division of Plant Industry PO Box 147100 Gainesville FL 32614-7100 352-372-3505 September 14, 2005 MEMORANDUM TO: Registered Florida Nurseries FROM: Richard D. Gaskalla, Director, FDACS/Division of Plant Industry SUBJECT: Citrus Greening / Huanglongbing Due to the recent detection of citrus greening disease (Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus) in Miami-Dade County, we would like to provide you with access to the latest information in regards to this disease and the current regulations. Enclosed is a Citrus Greening Pest Alert (September 2005). The Division of Plant Industry also maintains an internet website with details and information about Citrus Greening. The website address is: http://www.doacs.state.fl.us/pi/enpp/ento/citrusgreening.html Citrus greening disease is considered to be one of the most serious citrus diseases in the world. The bacteria are transmitted primarily by insect vectors (citrus psyllid). The citrus psyllid was first detected in Florida in 1998 and has since been detected throughout the state. At the present time and due to the direct exposure of citrus greening disease in Miami-Dade County, all ornamental citrus psyllid host plant material in addition to all citrus is quarantined and prohibited from movement out of Miami-Dade County. Please be advised that a compliance agreement is being developed in conjunction with the United States Department of Agriculture that will include recommended controls and treatments for the citrus psyllid. These treatments will allow for citrus psyllid host plant material, excluding all citrus and citrus greening host plants, from Miami-Dade County to be shipped within the state of Florida and to non-citrus producing states.
    [Show full text]
  • CITRUS the Botanictanic Garden of the Universitat De València
    Botanical monographs CITRUS The Botanictanic Garden of the Universitat de València Gema Ancillo Alejandro Medina Botanical Monographs CITRUS Gema Ancillo and Alejandro Medina Botanical Monographs. Jardín Botánico de la Universitat de València Volume 2: Citrus Texts ©: Gema Ancillo and Alejandro Medina Introduction ©: Isabel Mateu Images and illustrations ©: Gema Ancillo, Alejandro Medina and José Plumed Publication ©: Universitat de València E. G. Director of the monographic series: Isabel Mateu Technical director: Martí Domínguez Graphic design and layout: José Luis Iniesta Revision and correction: José Manuel Alcañiz Translation: Fabiola Barraclough, Interglobe Language Photographs: José Plumed, Gema Ancillo, Alejandro Medina, Miguel Angel Ortells and José Juarez Cover photograph: Miguel Angel Ortells Printed by: Gráfi cas Mare Nostrum, S. L. Legal Deposit: V-439-2015 ISBN: 978-84-370-9632-2 Index Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 The Aurantioideae Subfamily....................................................................................................11 – General description ...............................................................................................................................11 – Trunk ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 – Roots .....................................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Genetic Resources in California
    Citrus Genetic Resources in California Analysis and Recommendations for Long-Term Conservation Report of the Citrus Genetic Resources Assessment Task Force T.L. Kahn, R.R. Krueger, D.J. Gumpf, M.L. Roose, M.L. Arpaia, T.A. Batkin, J.A. Bash, O.J. Bier, M.T. Clegg, S.T. Cockerham, C.W. Coggins Jr., D. Durling, G. Elliott, P.A. Mauk, P.E. McGuire, C. Orman, C.O. Qualset, P.A. Roberts, R.K. Soost, J. Turco, S.G. Van Gundy, and B. Zuckerman Report No. 22 June 2001 Published by Genetic Resources Conservation Program Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA i This report is one of a series published by the University of California Genetic Resources Conservation Program (technical editor: P.E. McGuire) as part of the public information function of the Program. The Program sponsors projects in the collection, inventory, maintenance, preservation, and utilization of genetic resources important for the State of California as well as research and education in conservation biology. Further information about the Program may be obtained from: Genetic Resources Conservation Program University of California One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 USA (530) 754-8501 FAX (530) 754-8505 e-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.grcp.ucdavis.edu/ Additional copies of this report may be ordered from this address. Citation: Kahn TL, RR Krueger, DJ Gumpf, ML Roose, ML Arpaia, TA Batkin, JA Bash, OJ Bier, MT Clegg, ST Cockerham, CW Coggins Jr, D Durling, G Elliott, PA Mauk, PE McGuire, C Orman, CO Qualset, PA Roberts, RK Soost, J Turco, SG Van Gundy, and B Zuckerman.
    [Show full text]
  • And Cross-Incompatibility of Various Citrus Accessions
    園学雑.(J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci.) 75 (5): 372–378. 2006. Self- and Cross-incompatibility of Various Citrus Accessions Masashi Yamamoto*, Tatsuya Kubo and Shigeto Tominaga Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Korimoto, Kagoshima 890–0065, Japan Self-incompatibility and compatibility of 65 citrus accessions were determined by pollen tube growth in the style. Lemon was self-compatible whereas the six pummelos and seven out of 11 its relatives were self-incompatible. Furthermore, among sour oranges and their relatives, two out of six accessions were, likewise, self-incompatible as were one out of five sweet orange and their relatives. Every yuzu and its relatives, except hyuga-natsu, were self-compatible. Of the mandarin and its relatives, 14 out of 28 accessions were self-incompatible, whereas calamondin, a kumquat relative, and Hedzuka daidai of diverse origin were self-compatible. Thirty-one out of 65 accessions used in this study were self-incompatible. Of the self-incompatible accessions, clementine and ‘Ariake’, a hybrid of navel orange and clementine, were cross- incompatible. Thus, the incompatible genotypes of those two accessions were considered to be identical. Key Words: citrus, cross-incompatibility, pollen fertility, pollen tube, self-incompatibility. Introduction in this study, we examined self-incompatibility of various accessions and cross-incompatibility of several Self-incompatibility and parthenocarpy in Citrus are cross combinations that resulted in new self- and cross- very important traits for fruit production because they incompatibility progenies. In addition, we proposed the result in seedless fruit (Iwamasa and Oba, 1980; Li, S genotype of a few accessions. 1980; Yamamoto and Tominaga, 2002; Yamamoto et Materials and Methods al., 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • The Main Tea Eta Automat Titan at Na Na Na Na Natin
    THE MAIN TEA ETA USAUTOMAT 20180279653A1 TITAN AT NA NA NA NA NATIN ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2018 /0279653 A1 ICHIMURA et al . ( 43) Pub . Date : Oct . 4 , 2018 (54 ) BEVERAGE CONTAINING FRUIT JUICE OF Publication Classification FLAVORFUL ACIDIC CITRUS FRUIT (51 ) Int. Ci. ( 71 ) Applicant: SUNTORY HOLDINGS LIMITED , A23L 2 / 02 (2006 .01 ) A23L 2 /56 ( 2006 . 01) Osaka ( JP ) A23L 2 /68 (2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventors : Atsushi ICHIMURA , Kanagawa ( JP ) ; (52 ) U . S . CI. Yuki MIYAO , Kanagawa ( JP ) ; Daigo CPC .. A23L 2 /02 (2013 .01 ) ; A23V 2002/ 00 IBUSUKI, Kanagawa ( JP ) ( 2013. 01 ) ; A23L 2 / 68 (2013 . 01 ); A23L 2 / 56 ( 73 ) Assignee : SUNTORY HOLDINGS LIMITED , (2013 .01 ) Osaka ( JP ) (21 ) Appl. No. : 15 /542 , 491 ( 57 ) ABSTRACT (22 ) PCT Filed : Jan . 13, 2016 Provided is a beverage with flavorful acidic citrus fruit - like ( 86 ) PCT No. : PCT/ JP2016 / 050762 qualities , which makes one perceive a sensation of fruit freshness and a characteristic flavor of flavorful acidic citrus § 371 (c )( 1 ), fruits . In the flavorful acidic citrus fruit juice - containing ( 2 ) Date : Jul. 10 , 2017 beverage having a fruit juice content of not less than 1 % and ( 30 ) Foreign Application Priority Data not more than 30 % , the ratio of the amount of naringin to the total amount of naringin , hesperidin , eriocitrin , narirutin , Jan . 16 , 2015 ( JP ) . .. .. .. 2015 -007118 neohesperidin , and rutin is adjusted to be in the range of 0 . 10 Mar . 30 , 2015 ( JP ) . .. .. .. .. 2015 - 068126 to 0 . 50 . US 2018 /0279653 A1 Oct . 4 , 2018 BEVERAGE CONTAINING FRUIT JUICE OF fruit - like qualities, which makes one perceive a sensation of FLAVORFUL ACIDIC CITRUS FRUIT fruit freshness and a characteristic flavor of flavorful acidic citrus fruits .
    [Show full text]
  • Table 3. Species of Papilio Used in This Study, Host Plants, Larval Morphology, Host Growth Form, and Host Leaf Size
    Table 3. Species of Papilio used in this study, host plants, larval morphology, host growth form, and host leaf size Species Host plants Larval morphology Host Host leaf growth size(s) form(s) Papilio aegeus Citrus australasica , Citrus australis , Citrus Cryptic (1, 11) Tree, Shrub Narrow, Wide garrawayae , Citrus inodora , Clausena brevistyla , Dinosperma erythrococca , Dinosperma melanophloia , Eriostemon australasius , Flindersia australis, Flindersia bennettii, Flindersia collina, Flindersia ifflaiana, Flindersia laevicarpa, Flindersia oppositifolia, Flindersia pimenteliana, Flindersia schottiana, Geijera salicifolia, Geijera parviflora, Halfordia spp, Leionema ambiens, Leionema dentatum, Micromelum minutum, Philotheca myoporoides, Zanthoxylum brachyachanthum, Zanthoxylum nitidum, Zieria laevigata, Zieria smithii (2) P. alexanor Opopanax chironium, Opopanax hispidus, Seseli Aposematic (11) Herb, Shrub Narrow, Wide montanum, Pimpinella saxifraga, Ptychotis saxifraga (heterophylla), Scaligera cretica (napiformis), Ferula communis, Pastinaca sativa, Trinia glauca (vulgaris) , Seseli dioicum , Falcaria vulgaris, Seseli libanotis, Torilis heterophylla, Ferula karategina, Ferula ugamica (20, 21, 23) P. anactus Citrus australasica, Citrus australis, Citrus Aposematic (2, 12, 16) Shrub, Tree Narrow, Wide garrawayae, Citrus glauca, Citrus inodora, Geijera parviflora , Citrus (Microcitrus) australis, Citrus (Microcitrus) australiasica, Eremocitrus glauca (2, 12) P. anchisiades Citrus sinensis, Citrus aurantiaca, Citrus limon, Bird dropping
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Citrus and Its Relatives Based on Matk Gene Sequences
    Phylogenetic Relationships of Citrus and Its Relatives Based on matK Gene Sequences Tshering Penjor1,2, Masashi Yamamoto3*., Miki Uehara1, Manami Ide1, Natsumi Matsumoto1, Ryoji Matsumoto1, Yukio Nagano4*. 1 Department of Applied Biological Sciences, Saga University, Honjo, Saga, Japan, 2 Renewable Natural Resources Research Centre Wengkhar, Mongar, Bhutan, 3 Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Korimoto, Kagoshima, Japan, 4 Analytical Research Center for Experimental Sciences, Saga University, Honjo, Saga, Japan Abstract The genus Citrus includes mandarin, orange, lemon, grapefruit and lime, which have high economic and nutritional value. The family Rutaceae can be divided into 7 subfamilies, including Aurantioideae. The genus Citrus belongs to the subfamily Aurantioideae. In this study, we sequenced the chloroplast matK genes of 135 accessions from 22 genera of Aurantioideae and analyzed them phylogenetically. Our study includes many accessions that have not been examined in other studies. The subfamily Aurantioideae has been classified into 2 tribes, Clauseneae and Citreae, and our current molecular analysis clearly discriminate Citreae from Clauseneae by using only 1 chloroplast DNA sequence. Our study confirms previous observations on the molecular phylogeny of Aurantioideae in many aspects. However, we have provided novel information on these genetic relationships. For example, inconsistent with the previous observation, and consistent with our preliminary study using the chloroplast rbcL genes, our analysis showed that Feroniella oblata is not nested in Citrus species and is closely related with Feronia limonia. Furthermore, we have shown that Murraya paniculata is similar to Merrillia caloxylon and is dissimilar to Murraya koenigii. We found that ‘‘true citrus fruit trees’’ could be divided into 2 subclusters.
    [Show full text]