DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado, Little Bear—On September 1, 1956, A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Colorado, Little Bear—On September 1, 1956, A Colorado, Little Bear— On September 1, 1956, a warm cloudless day with no wind, a party of five climbers (Mark Bostwick, David and Paul Duncan, Ben Rhodes and Banks Caywood) left the Denver Junior Summer Outing camp site at Como Lake to climb Blanca and Little Bear peaks. After reaching Blanca Peak, the party continued across the difficult Blanca Little Bear Ridge to Little Bear Peak. After lunch and a brief rest on the summit, the party began the descent about 2:00 p.m. Climbers of the previous day had advised them not to descend the loose ridge between Como Lake and Little Bear Basin, but to follow a couloir of less difficulty leading off the the summit into Little Bear Basin. About 500 feet off the summit Banks Caywood fell. The exact cause of his fall is not known, for three of the party were exploring the couloir to the left side and one the center while Banks looked over a small cliff on the right. The member in the center looked up just in time to see Banks’ hat disappearing from sight and to hear a rockfall. The four remaining members climbed down approximately 350 feet to the spot where Banks lay. After careful examination they realized that he was dead and that they would have to have assistance to bring out his body. After covering the body and marking the spot, they proceeded back to camp arriving about 6:00 p.m. The proper authorities were notified and on September 2, eleven JCMC members under the leadership of Mr. Welch and Dr. Burns brought down Banks’ body. On Thursday, September 6, a meeting was called of CMC officers, the council of the Denver Junior Group, and members involved. They made a careful study of all phases of the accident and reached the conclusion that the climbers were proceeding with caution and using proper technique at the time of the accident. Source: Trail and Timberline, November, 1956 and W. P. Arnold. 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P
    # # # # # # # # # ######## # # ## # # # ## # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") (!KÂ ) )¬ (! LARAMIE" KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lodg Centennial 4 ep National Federal ole (! 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ Kimball 9 CHEYENNE 11 C 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY reek Bushnell (! 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside (! LARAMIE ! ") Ik ( ") (! ) " Colorado 1 8 (! 1 27 Y S.P. ") Pine !a 2 Ij Cree Medicine Bow 2 KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge R ") " National 34 .P. (! Burns Bluffs k U ") 10 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment (! 7 KEITH 40 Forest (! Red Buttes (! 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 (! DEUEL ") ) " ") 2 ! 6 ") 3 ( Albany ") 9 2 A (! 6 9 ) River 27 6 Ik !a " 1 2 3 6 3 CHEYENNE ") Brule K ") on ") G 4 10 Big Springs Jct. 9 lli ") ) Ik " ") 3 Chappell 2 14 (! (! 17 4 ") Vermi S Woods Landing ") !a N (! Ik ) ! 8 15 8 " ") ) ( " !a # ALBANY 3 3 ^! 5 7 2 3 ") ( Big Springs ") ") (! 4 3 (! 11 6 2 ek ") 6 WYOMING MI Dixon Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") (! (! 6 RA I« 10 ) Baggs Tie Siding " Cre Savery (! ! (! National ") ( 6 O 7 9 B (! 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge (! 4 NEBRASKA (! (! Powder K Res. ^ Home tonwo 2 ^ NE t o o ! C d ! ell h Little En (! WYOMING 3 W p ! 7 as S Tala Sh (! W Slater cam ^ ") Ovid 4 ! ! mant Snake River pm ^ ^ 3 ! es Cr (! ! ! ^ Li ! Gr Mi en ^ ^ ^ ttle eek 8 ! ^JULESBURG een Creek k Powder Wash ddle t ! Hereford (! ! 8 e NORTHGATE 4 ( Peetz ! ! Willo ork K R Virginia Jumbo Lake Sedgwick ! ! # T( ") Cre F ing (! 1 ek Y 7 RA ^ Cre CANYON ek Lara (! Dale B I§ w Big Creek o k F e 2 9 8 Cre 9 Cr x DAGGETT o Fo m Lakes e 7 C T(R B r NATURE TRAIL ") A ee u So k i e e lde d 7 r lomon e k a I« 1 0 Cr mil h k k r 17 t r r 293 PERKINS River Creek u e 9 River Pawnee v 1 e o e ") Carr ree r Rockport Stuc Poud 49 7 r® Dry S Ri C National 22 SENTINAL La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ (! (! k 6 NE e A Gr e Halligan Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED the COLORADO FOURTEENERS (In Order of Date of Submittal) ` First Name M.I
    EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED THE COLORADO FOURTEENERS (In Order of Date of Submittal) ` First Name M.I. Last Name First Peak Month Year Last Peak Month Year 1. Carl Blaurock (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 2. William F. Ervin (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 3. Albert Ellingwood 4. Mary Cronin Longs Peak 1921 Sep 1934 5. Carl Melzer 1937 6. Robert B. Melzer 1937 7. Elwyn Arps Eolus, Mt. 1920 Jul 1938 8. Joe Merhar Pyramid Peak Aug 1938 9. O. P. Settles Longs Peak 1927 Jul 1939 10. Harry Standley Elbert, Mt. 1923 Sep 1939 11. Whitney M. Borland Pikes Peak Jun 1941 12. Vera DeVries Longs Peak 1936 Kit Carson Peak Aug 1941 13. Robert M. Ormes Pikes Peak Capitol Peak Aug 1941 14. Jack Graham Sep 1941 15. John Ambler Sep 1943 16. Paul Gorham Pikes Peak 1926 Aug 1944 17. Ruth Gorham Grays Peak 1933 Aug 1944 18. Henry Buchtel Longs Peak 1946 19. Herb Hollister Longs Peak 1927 Jul 1947 20. Roy Murchison Longs Peak 1908 Aug 1947 21. Evelyn Runnette Longs Peak 1931 Uncompahgre Peak Sep 1947 22. Marian Rymer Longs Peak 1926 Crestones Sep 1948 23. Charles Rymer Longs Peak 1927 Crestones Sep 1948 24. Nancy E. Nones (Perkins) Quandary 1937 Eolus, Mt. Sep 1948 25. John Spradley Longs Peak 1943 Jul 1949 26. Eliot Moses Longs Peak 1921 Jul 1949 27. Elizabeth S. Cowles Lincoln, Mt. Sep 1932 Wetterhorn Peak Sep 1949 28. Dorothy Swartz Crestones Aug 1950 29. Robert Swartz Bross, Mt. 1941 Crestones Aug 1950 30.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    COLORADO FOURTEENERS INITIATIVE ANNUAL REPORT PROTECT RESTORE EDUCATE WELCOME LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COVER: As dangerous as it is beautiful. The north face of Capitol Peak was the location for five climber fatalities in 2017, half of an all-time-record 10 deaths on 14ers. Photo by Cameron Miller Photography. WELCOME LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR “Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much” --Helen Keller Collaboration has been a hallmark of Colorado Fourteeners Initiative’s 14er stewardship work dating back to our inception in 1994 as “a partnership for preservation.” With a very short alpine field season and more than 50 peaks spread across the state, CFI has always relied on partnerships with other groups to bring out as many people as possible and make the greatest impact. From youth corps crews to volunteer stewardship organizations, businesses to individual enthusiasts across the country, CFI has worked with just about any willing partner to protect the 14ers. In 2017, however, CFI’s focus on collaboration expanded significantly thanks to the first year of the National Forest Foundation’s “Find Your Fourteener” campaign. The first season of this multi-year effort injected additional funding, fostered creative new approaches to getting work done and generated considerable enthusiasm that allowed Colorado Fourteeners Initiative to significantly boost project work on several 14ers. Collaboration on Mount Elbert saw CFI fielding two separate leadership teams on the mountain (one working at timberline, one near the trailhead), two separate Rocky Mountain Youth Corps crews, a youth corps “Peak Apprentice” position helping coordinate crews and volunteer projects, a prison work crew cutting and delivering logs, and multiple collaborative projects with statewide and local trail stewardship organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mile High Mountaineer the Newsletter of the Denver Group of the Colorado Mountain Club Volume 42, No
    Mile High Mountaineer The newsletter of the Denver Group of the Colorado Mountain Club Volume 42, No. 7 July 2010 • www.cmc.org The Top 14 Fourteeners Only the crème de la crème make this list By Kurt Wibbenmeyer 14. Mount Bierstadt (14,060) – The most artistic peak: 5. Pyramid Peak (14,018) – The most dangerous peak: Best viewed from Abyss Lake; named for the famous Due to the loose stone this peak takes total concentration Hudson River School painter, Albert Bierstadt whose from the cirque to the saddle and up to the summit and painting of Longs Peak hangs in the state’s Capitol. back down to the cirque. My mind drifted after returning 13. Mount Bross (14,172) – The best glissade: The to the saddle where I slipped and rolled about 25 feet. twisting turning 2500 foot glissade descent off the west 4. Snowmass Mountain (14,092) – The snowiest peak: flank of Bross is exhilarating and is often accompanied To climb this peak in late spring from Snowmass Lake is by a big grin and an exuberant verbal expression. an excellent snow climb. The vastness of the snow field is 12. Quandary Peak (14,265) – The best training incredible to witness and then to break through the snow peak: I like climbing this peak when conditioning for cornice at the ridge is a great challenge. a mountaineering expedition by carrying a heavy pack. 3. Mount Sneffels (14,150) – The best alpine climb: The trailhead is open all year, the distance is short, the The Snake Couloir on the north side is an extraordinary elevation gain is 3300 feet and I can complete the climbing Alpine climb that is usually done with roped protection trip in 5 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Timberline 1 Letter from the CEO Celebrating in Style
    HigHer tHan everest 16 • make it spiritual 28 • tHe fourteeners and beyond 36 Trail & TThe Coloradoimberline Mountain Club • Winter 2011 • Issue 1013 • www.cmc.org Rocky Mountain HigH Trail & Timberline 1 Letter from the CEO Celebrating in Style n October 1, the CmC officially Climbs, and ryan ross is helping to put on launched its 100th year anniver- a majority of the events throughout the year. sary. i’m pleased to announce Thank you! Owe’ve dramatically expanded our plans to Registration for the first two events is celebrate the club’s milestone. We’re going open now at www.cmc.org/centennial. See to hold a series of “big-tent” events to better the entire calendar of events on page 6. take advantage of this once-in-a-century op- I look forward to seeing you at as many portunity to honor our history, drive fund- of these events as you can attend. One thing raising, increase membership, and celebrate i know for certain: We will end our centen- in style. Here’s your chance to be a part of nial year knowing we did everything we club history. could to celebrate this once-a-century mile- We’ve got a star-studded lineup to help stone in style. us celebrate, including a few local celebri- Happy 100th, CmC! ties. none of this would be possible with- out the help of a few committed and hard working volunteers. Our 100th anniversary Committee is comprised of linda lawson, Giles Toll, Steve bonowski, al Ossinger, Katie Blackett John Devitt, and bob reimann.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME Elevations and Distances in the United
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 241 333 SE 044 120 TITLE Elevations and Distances in the United States. INSTITUTION Geological Survey (Dept. of Interior), Reston, Va. PUB DATE 80 NOTE 13p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Geographic Materials (133) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Charts; *Distance; Earth Science; *Geographic Location; Geography; *Height; Instructional Materials; Physical Divisions (Geographic); *Physical Geography; *Proximity; Secondary Education; Tables (Data); Topography; Urban Areas IDENTIFIERS PF Project; Rocky Mountains; *United States ABSTRACT One of a series of general interest publications on science topics, the booklet proviees those interested in elevations and distances with a nontechnical introduction to the subject. The entire document consists of statistical charts depicting the nation's 50 largest cities, extreme and mean elevations, elevations of named summits over 14,000 feet above sea level, elevations of selected summits east of the Rocky Mountains, distances from extreme points to geographic centers, and lengths of United States boundaries. The elevations of features and distances between pbints in the United States were determined from surveys and topographic maps of the U.S. Geological Survey. (LH) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** . r Mee Notion's principal conservation agency, the Department AIthe *hider hoe responsibility for most of our nationally owned -MOM lends sad n,.twal ammo. This includes fostering the Elevations 'MN* Use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and ilitillie,:ermervinj the emoironmentsi and cultural values of our and Distances Malone parks sad.historlcM places, and providing for the enjoy- s _meat of life tha.: oh outdoor recrecion.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Sacred Mountains
    • 29 Contested Landscapes of Navajo Sacred Mountains Kevin S. Blake Sacred mountains are integral to the Navajo worldview, yet their land use is often incongruous with their spiritual significance. Nearly all of the land of the six massifs that are deeply symbolic within Navajo ori­ gin stories is located beyond the Navajo Reservation on federal land. This paper compares Navajo symbolism to land use at Blanca Peak (CO), Mount Taylor (NM), San Francisco Peaks (AZ), Hesperus Moun­ tain (CO), Huerfano Mountain (NM), and Gobernador Knob (NM). Each mountain has mullicul/ural symbolism and land use that imprints several layers of meaning upon the peaks. Non-Navajo uses include transmission towers, ski areas, mineral development, and moun­ taineering, whereas Navajo use includes visits to collect plants and soil for ceremonies and to connect with spiritual powers. Public land management allempts to balance contrasting environmental percep­ tions, but competing resource demands and mountain aesthetics often create contested landscapes. Keywords: Navajo (Dine), moun­ tains, sacred places, contested landscapes, public land management, American Southwest, environmental ethics. On the way down the sacred Francisco Peaks, I stop to pass mountain I meet a group of Nava­ time with one of the adult leaders. jo schoolchildren, chattering their His first words, "How far to way along the steep and forested heaven?" strike a chord with my path. Weary from the icy and purpose of climbing that day: to snowy stretches of trail that took gain a beller understanding of the me to the summit of the San landscape character and Navajo The Nonh American Geograph~r.
    [Show full text]
  • Difficulty4 Fourteener Name Elev in Feet Trails Illust Map USGS 7.5
    Fourteener Elev in Trails Illust USGS Lat Long Dist3 Vert3 Difficulty4 Name Feet Map 7.5' Topo (RT) Gain Grade Class Antero, Mt 14,269 130 E Mt Antero & St Elmo 38° 40' 106° 15' 13 5200 C 2 Belford, Mt 14,197 129 W Mt Harvard 38° 58' 106° 22' 7 4500 B 2 Bierstadt, Mt 14,060 104 E Mt Evans 39° 35' 105° 40' 6.5 2800 A 2 Blanca Peak 14,345 138 S Blanca Peak & Twin Peaks 37° 35' 105° 29' 14 5000 D 2 Bross, Mt 14,172 109 E Alma 39° 20' 106° 06' 5 2900 A 2 Cameron, Mt2 14,238 109 E Alma 39° 21' 106° 07' 4.5 3000 A 2 Capitol Peak 14,130 128 E Capitol Peak 39° 09' 107° 05' 15 4800 D 3 E Castle Peak 14,265 127 W Hayden Peak 39° 01' 106° 52' 10 4400 C 2 Challenger Point2 14,081 138 S Crestone Peak 37° 59' 105° 36' 10 5400 C 3 Columbia, Mt 14,073 129 W Mt Harvard 38° 54' 106° 18' 11 4100 C 2 Conundrum Peak2 14,022 127 W Hayden Peak 39° 01' 106° 52' 10 4200 C 3 Crestone Needle 14,197 138 S Crestone Peak 37° 58' 105° 35' 18 5400 D 3 E Crestone Peak 14,294 138 S Crestone Peak 37° 58' 105° 35' 20 6700 D 3 E Culebra Peak 14,047 N/A Culebra Peak & El Valle Creek 37° 07' 105° 11' 4 2500 A 2 Democrat, Mt 14,148 109 W Climax & Alma 39° 20' 106° 08' 7 3500 B 2 El Diente Peak 14,159 141 W Delores Peak & Mt Wilson 37° 50' 108° 00' 13.5 4800 D 3 Elbert, Mt 14,433 127 E Mt Elbert & Mt Massive 39° 07' 106° 27' 8.5 4700 C 1 Ellingwood Point 14,042 138 S Blanca Peak & Twin Peaks 37° 35' 105° 30' 13.5 4700 D 3 Eolus, Mt 14,083 140 W Columbine Pass & Mnt View Crest 37° 37' 107° 37' 18.5 6000 D 3 Evans, Mt 14,264 104 E Mt Evans 39° 35' 105° 39' 1 1500 A 2 Grays Peak
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Hiking Use on Colorado's 14Ers
    Estimated Hiking Use on Colorado’s 14ers Total Hiker Use Days: 415,000 (2020 Data) Front Range Best Est: 113,500 Mosquito Range Best Est: 49,000 Longs Peak 15,000-20,000^ Mount Lincoln 25,000-30,000* Pikes Peak 15,000-20,000* Mount Bross Torreys Peak 30,000-35,000* Mount Democrat Grays Peak Mount Sherman 15,000-20,000* Mount Evans 7,000-10,000 Mount Bierstadt 35,000-40,000* Elk Mountains Best Est: 11,500 Castle Peak 3,000-5,000* Tenmile Range Best Est: 49,000 Maroon Peak 1,000-3,000 Quandary Peak 45,000-50,000* Capitol Peak 1,000-3,000 Snowmass Mountain 1,000-3,000 Pyramid Peak 1,000-3,000 Sawatch Range Best Est: 110,000 Mount Elbert 20,000-25,000* Mount Massive 7,000-10,000 Sangre de Cristo Range Best Est: 13,000 Mount Harvard 5,000-7,000 Blanca Peak 1,000-3,000* La Plata Peak 5,000-7,000* Ellingwood Point Mount Antero 3,000-5,000 Crestone Peak 1,000-3,000 Mount Shavano 7,000-10,000 Crestone Needle 1,000-3,000 Tabegauche Peak Kit Carson Peak 1,000-3,000 Mount Belford 7,000-10,000 Challenger Point Mount Oxford Humboldt Peak 1,000-3,000 Mount Princeton 7,000-10,000* Culebra Peak <1,000 Mount Yale 7,000-10,000 Mount Lindsey 1,000-3,000* Mount Columbia 3,000-5,000 Little Bear Peak 1,000-3,000 Missouri Mountain 5,000-7,000 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.09.16.Appg
    BLANCA PEAK SPECIAL INTEREST AREA (CULTURAL) Proposed Designated Area Rio Grande National Forest 4,300 acres Conejos Peak Ranger District General Description Blanca Peak holds tremendous cultural significance for many of the indigenous cultures in southwest Colorado and the upper Rio Grande valley. Navajo, Ute, Jicarilla Apache, and the Upper Rio Grande Pueblos all place great value on maintaining the pristine integrity of Blanca Peak. The proposed Blanca Peak Special Interest Area comprises that portion of the massif located on the Rio Grande National Forest. The mountain is under overlapping jurisdictions with other portions administered by the Pike-San Isabel National Forest, the Bureau of Land Management, and the private Trinchera Blanca Ranch. In addition to its cultural significance, Blanca Peak possesses outstanding recreational and scenic values as well. The Blanca Peak SIA includes three well-known Colorado fourteeners – Blanca Peak, Little Bear Peak, and Ellingwood Point – which attract several thousand mountaineers each year. All are drawn in large part by the dramatic alpine scenery of the high glacial basins and rugged granitic peaks. The Rio Grande National Forest’s Assessment of Areas of Tribal Importance provides a thorough and compelling summary of Blanca Peak’s cultural significance to regional tribes: “Mount Blanca, Sierra Blanca or Blanca Peak is sacred to the Navajo, Ute and Jicarilla Tribes. It is also an important anchor point within the cultural landscape of the Upper Rio Grande pueblos, known as Pintsae’i’i or “White Mountains” in Tewa. It is of particular significance to the Navajo Tribe, or Dinéh of the American Southwest. To them it is known as Sisnaajini or “White Shell Mountain”.
    [Show full text]