Navajo Sacred Mountains

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Navajo Sacred Mountains • 29 Contested Landscapes of Navajo Sacred Mountains Kevin S. Blake Sacred mountains are integral to the Navajo worldview, yet their land use is often incongruous with their spiritual significance. Nearly all of the land of the six massifs that are deeply symbolic within Navajo ori­ gin stories is located beyond the Navajo Reservation on federal land. This paper compares Navajo symbolism to land use at Blanca Peak (CO), Mount Taylor (NM), San Francisco Peaks (AZ), Hesperus Moun­ tain (CO), Huerfano Mountain (NM), and Gobernador Knob (NM). Each mountain has mullicul/ural symbolism and land use that imprints several layers of meaning upon the peaks. Non-Navajo uses include transmission towers, ski areas, mineral development, and moun­ taineering, whereas Navajo use includes visits to collect plants and soil for ceremonies and to connect with spiritual powers. Public land management allempts to balance contrasting environmental percep­ tions, but competing resource demands and mountain aesthetics often create contested landscapes. Keywords: Navajo (Dine), moun­ tains, sacred places, contested landscapes, public land management, American Southwest, environmental ethics. On the way down the sacred Francisco Peaks, I stop to pass mountain I meet a group of Nava­ time with one of the adult leaders. jo schoolchildren, chattering their His first words, "How far to way along the steep and forested heaven?" strike a chord with my path. Weary from the icy and purpose of climbing that day: to snowy stretches of trail that took gain a beller understanding of the me to the summit of the San landscape character and Navajo The Nonh American Geograph~r. ;\ (1). PI'. 29-62. ~ 200/1Jy Tilt' North American Gt'ogmpher. 30 The North Americun Geographer symbolism associated with the different visions expressed in the mountain and to compare its land landscape of what constitutes use with its cultural meaning. walking in beauty. His name is Norman Jensen, and Among the most ecologically he is leading this group from diverse landscapes on Earth, Tuba City, Arizona, to visit each mountains evoke emotions rang­ of the Navajo sacred mountains. ing from sheer terror to glorious He says ,ost kids are unaware inspiration. Billions connect to that there are sacred mountains, peaks in a spiritual way, finding so they' are starting with the them integral to their worldview basics of where the mountains and daily lives (Bernbaum 1990). are, how they deserve respect, High peaks also serve as multi­ and how people can connect to faceted cultural symbols, repre­ and appreciate their spiritual senting everything from mineral power. Their goal that day is not resources to sacred beliefs, from to reach the top, but rather to recreation to community identity reach a point with a view toward (Blake 1999a). Norman Jensen's Agassiz Peak, second-highest group illustrates the potential summit in the massif, and the ski individual. and cultural signifi­ area facilities that snake their cance of mountains to the Navajo way up the mountain. Here they or Dine, the People, the most will see first-hand the scale of populous reserv;Jtion-based development that is possible on a American Indian nation in the sacred mountain, yet still feel for United States, who also occupy themselves the spiritual power the reservation with the largest that remains. Norman and J fin­ land area (Griffin-Pierce 2000). ish chatting about the interpreta­ Within the Navajo homeland tions that are possible of a sacred nearly all aspects of the natural mountain, and depart with mutu­ world have cultural meaning, but al wishes to "walk in beauty," the mountains are especially signifi­ Navajo phrase implying a com­ cant in oral traditions and cere­ plete and harmonious spiritual monies, forming the cornerstone connection with the environment. of a Navajo sacred geography But before each of us leaves the (Reichard 1950; Jett 1992; Jett mountain that day we will see far 200 l). Navajo landforms are Blake 31 deeply embedded in the image of by the Bureau of Land Manage­ the American Southwest, result­ ment or the U.S. Forest Service, ing in an increasing appreciation resulting in a distinctive set of and awareness of sacred place multi-cultural symbols for these symbolism (Byrkit 1992; Lloyd places and offering a case study 1995), yet the land use of the for the power of sacred symbol­ Navajo sacred mountains is often ism and mountain iconography to incongruous with their symbol­ cross borders in the Southwest. A Ism. FurthemlOre, little under­ review of secondary literature standing exists of the syncretic sources explains Navajo symbol­ processes that bind people to the ism, but fieldwork forms the cen­ sacred peaks and how land use tnll element of this study. The ret1ects the divergent attitudes sacred mountain landscapes were that achieve landscape expression intimately explored several times This article examines the con­ by foot over the past ten years. tested landscapes of six Navajo The land use information on pub­ sacred mountains by describing lic land maps was compared with the Navajo symbolism, compar­ first-hand observations, and dis­ ing secular and sacred land uses, cussions were held with land and exploring several dimensions managers and the Navajo. While ofland use cont1icts. Concluding public visitation could be inter­ the article are visions of what the preted to diminish the perceived future could hold for the Navajo power of holy places, an under­ sacred mountains. By examining standing beyond the Navajo cul­ the six most deeply symbolic ture of the sacred mountains is Navajo sacred mountains, rather necessary to ensure their proper than only the four that symbolize respect and protection. Further­ the outer limits of the Navajo more, specific and vulnerable homeland (e.g., Goodman 1982), sacred sites should be kept secret, a more complete and integrati ve but little objection exists to the view is possible of land use and discussion and knowledge of landscape symbolism. Almost all major sacred landmarks (Jett of the land of the six mountains is 1995). located beyond the Navajo Reser­ The implications of this study vation on federal land managed run deep for southwestern land- 32 The North American Geographer scape images, Navajo cultural 1995). To harm sacred land is a identity, and the management of violation causing the loss of heal­ sacred mountains. The American ing power and the ability of a Indian Religious Freedom Act of mountain to restore harmony to 1978 mandates access to sacred Navajo lives (Michaelson 1995). places and the consideration of such sites in federal land-use Navajo Sacred Mountains directives (Kelley and Francis More than repositories of spiritu­ 1994; lett 1995). A May 24, al power, mountains are elemen­ 1996 Presidential Executive tal in Navajo prayers and chants Order further charges each feder­ (O'Bryan 1993) as well as the al agency with accommodating ceremonial Blessingway (Wyman American Indian access to and 1970), Beautyway (Wyman ceremonial use of sacred sites 1957), and Mountainway and preserving the physical (Wyman 1975). Mountains also integrity of the sites. Seemingly create symbolic boundaries, clear directives may nevertheless repeat a favorable pattern of pro­ be widely interpreted. Contested tection and well-being through­ landscapes evolve when differing out Dine Bikeyah, the land of the environmental ethics and cultural Navajo, and embody powerful identities collide in places with mnemonic devices to conjure the deep meaning. Although the atti­ thoughts and lessons associated tudes of anyone culture may not with places (McPherson 1992). be stereotyped into neatly defined Some Nav ajo places have a packages, such as Navajos greater sanctity according to their always supporting the option of prominence in Navajo events and least development or non-Indians the importance of their associated always favoring mineral develop­ supernatural beings (Jett 1992). ment, this article is mostly con­ Mountains were the first places cerned with the relationship of created in this world; thus here sacred places to Navajo cultural the Holy People are most evident identity, for the believers in or accessible to mortal pilgrims, Navajo religion perceive the and mountains connect people greatest risk of loss in the spiritu­ with their origin and anchor the al power of these places (Jett correct pursuit of the Navajo Blake 33 ways of life (Kelley and Francis can only imagine the long-range 1994). vistas possible in the days before The significance of mountains fossil fuel emissions - even in to the Navajo is even more tangi­ recent years I have seen land­ bly evident in the views of and marks 125 miles distant on the from mountains as well as the Colorado Plateau. collection of soil, stones, herbs, Six earthly mountains mani­ and water (lett 1995). Mountain fest the most significant places in soil symbolizes the Earth's flesh the Navajo origin and worldview (lett 2001) and the mountain soil (O'Bryan 1993; Kelley and Fran­ bundle (dah nfdiilyeeh) carried cis 1994; Frey 1998; Linford by traditional Navajos represents 2000). Additionally, the Blessing­ the medicine bundle of First way ceremony, the backbone of Man, out of which came all life Navajo religion and most revered (Gill 1981). Mountain products ritual, has six important peaks are collected by Navajo singers (Wyman 1970). Four of these (medicine men) for ceremonial sacred mountains are aligned in and healing use (Mayes and Lacy cardinal directions on the bound­ 1989); the spiritual power of aries of the historic core of Nava­ stones from the sacred mountains jo settlement in the Southwest was recognized in their use for (Dinetah), supporting the Navajo the altar in the Crownpoint, New sky and serving as the energy Mexico Catholic Mission (Guter­ source for animate beings (Farel­ son 1997). Singers make regular la 1984). Two other sacred moun­ pilgrimages to the sacred moun­ tains, Huerfano Mountain and tains to rejuvenate the Blessing­ Gobernador Knob, are at the cen­ way prayers (lett 1992) and to ter of the homeland in New Mex­ pray for relief from drought ico (Figure 1).
Recommended publications
  • Map 3.1 Travel Management Plan
    TOADLENA SHEEP SPRINGS GREAT BENDTHE PILLAR 3 NW THE PILLAR 3 NE TANNER LAKE PRETTY ROCKPUEBLO BONITO NW B836108 B636108 B536108 B436108 KIMBETO LYBROOK NW LYBROOK COUNSELORTANCOSA WINDMILL B336108 B236108 B136108 FIVE LAKES CANYON NEREGINA GALLINA ARROYA DEL AGUAYOUNGSVILLE CANONES ABIQUIU Y 134 B836107 B736107 B636107 B536107 B436107 MEDANALES LYDEN VELARDE TRAMPAS PENASCO TRES RITOS CERRO VISTA CHACON W B336107 B136107 B836106 B736106 B636106 B536106 E H B436106 B336106 B236106 B136106 B836105 B736105 B636105 B536105 B436105 B336105 T TOADLENA FIVE LAKES CANYON NW U STA 8 S 6 SONSELA BUTTES B236107 CRYSTAL WASHINGTON PASS S H Y A136109 NASCHITTI CHACO CANYON T W W A836108 THE PILLAR 3 SW A H A736108 THE PILLAR 3 SE Y E A636108 LA VIDA MISSION T T E A436108 PUEBLO BONITO HW 8 A A336108 FIRE ROCK WELL Y 44 ABIQUIU 4 TAOS GREY HILL SPRING T A236108 A836107 LYBROOK SE MULE DAM DEER MESA A636107 TAYLOR RANCH CUBA S A536108 KIN KLIZHIN RUINS A536107 A436107 A336107 NACIMIENTO PEAK JAROSA POLVADERA PEAK SARGENT RANCH A236107 A836106 VALLECITOS CHILI SAN JUAN PUEBLO CHIMAYO TRUCHAS EL VALLE JICARITA PEAK HOLMAN A136108 A736106 A636106 A436106 COMANCHE PEAK A736107 ARROYO CHIJUILLITA A336106 A236106 A136106 A836105 A736105 A636105 A536105 A436105 S A336105 CERRO DEL GRANT 6 A136107 7 T A536106 Y A W T STATE H HWY STAT E E BUELL PARK TODILTO PARK 1 H CHUSKA PEAK 26 W H135109 H835108 EAR ROCK Y H735108 RED LAKE WELL 5 H535108 MILK LAKE NOSE ROCK 18 COYOTE CANYON NW H335108 SEVEN LAKES NEPUEBLO PINTADO STANDING ROCK NW H235108 H135108 STAR LAKE
    [Show full text]
  • Monument Valley Meander
    RV Traveler's Roadmap to Monument Valley Meander However you experience it, the valley is a wonder to behold, a harsh yet hauntingly beautiful landscape. View it in early morning, when shadows lift from rocky marvels. Admire it in springtime,when tiny pink and blue wildflowers sprinkle the land with jewel-like specks of color. Try to see it through the eyes of the Navajos, who still herd their sheep and weave their rugs here. 1 Highlights & Facts For The Ideal Experience Agathla Peak Trip Length: Roughly 260 miles, plus side trips Best Time To Go: Spring - autumn What To Watch Out For: When on Indian reservations abide by local customs. Ask permission before taking photos, never disturb any of the artifacts. Must See Nearby Attractions: Grand Canyon National Park (near Flagstaff, AZ) Petrified Forest National Park (near Holbrook, AZ) Zion National Park (Springdale, UT) 2 Traveler's Notes Monument Valley Navajo Tribal Park The stretch of Rte. 163 called the Trail of the Ancients in honor of the vanished Anasazis cuts across Monument Valley at the Utah border on its way to the little town of Mexican Hat. Named for a rock formation there that resembles an upside-down sombrero a whimsical footnote to the magnificence of Monument Valley—Mexican Hat is the nearest settlement to Goosenecks State Park, just ahead and to the west via Rtes. 261 and 316. The monuments in the park have descriptive names. They are based on ones imagination. These names were created by the early settlers of Monument Valley. Others names portray a certain meaning to the Navajo people.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summer Vacation in Arizona
    JUNE 1959 FORTY CENTS IN THIS ISSUE: ASummer Vacation In Arizona VOL. XXXV NO. 6 JUNE 1959 You can't always tell by the cool calculations of the RAYMOND CARLSON, Editor calendar or the bobbing babble of the thermometer. The GEORGE M. A VEY, Art Editor testimony of the wayward sun is not always reliable. You JAMES E . STEVENS, Business Manager awaken one fine morning and for some indefinable reason LEGEND you know summer is just around the corner. There is a languor in the shadows and a soft sleepiness in the air that ARIZONA'S TIM BERED TREASURE 2 FORESTS OF STATE PRODUCE RICHES bespeak summer's approach. There is a drowsiness in the IN I.UMB E, R, Rf:C REATJO NAL ACTIVITIES. gossip of the green, green leaves caressed by the soft, THE PARADOX OF A LA\'A FLOW 8 warm breeze. You know that spring has had her Ring VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS IN NORTHERN ARIZONA CHANGED ENRICHED LAND. and another season is getting ready to cavort over the AN ARIZONA S ui\ Ii\TER VACATION landscape. //~-- ~.-.....,, ~ - JF YOU PL AN YO UR VACATION W"ELL, YOU'LL HAVE ONE COOL AND CAREFREE. we afe -n'i uch conce'_r.n'ea with summer this issue and SNOW IN JuLY 28 our p/ ges are an invitatiot~ ''.1} y ou to plan a cool and WHCN YOU CLIMB SA N FRANCISCO PEAKS careffee vacation in, our state.·, AiJ 'Of Northern Arizona ' , ,_ •. • IN J ULY YOU RUN INTO SURPRISES. is a huge sm:nmer v,ac~ti911 playgrouh~, where the scenery LONG MEADOW RANCH 34 is superb aricF1th.~' )-v:i::i:ther admirable -' for those who like Tms RANCH IN YAVAPAI COUNTY IS ONE //;') \ .
    [Show full text]
  • The Grants Uranium District, New Mexico: Update on Source, Deposition, and Exploration 1
    The Grants Uranium District, New Mexico: Update on Source, Deposition, and Exploration 1 VIRGINIA T. M cLEMORE 2 1. Manuscript received September 2, 2010; Accepted November 28, 2010 2. NM Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, 87801; [email protected] ABSTRACT More than 340 million pounds (lbs) of U 3O8 have been produced from the Grants uranium deposits in New Mexico between 1948 and 2002, and at least 403 million lbs of U 3O8 remain as unmined resources. The Grants district is one of the largest uranium provinces in the world. The Grants district extends from east of Laguna to west of Gallup in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico. Three types of sandstone uranium deposits are recognized: tabular, redistributed (roll-front, fault- related), and remnant-primary. The tabular deposits formed during the Jurassic Westwater Canyon time. Subsequently, oxidizing solutions moved downdip, modifying tabular deposits into redistributed roll- front and fault-related deposits. Evidence, including age dates and geochemistry of the uranium deposits, suggests that redistributed deposits could have been formed shortly after deposition in the early Creta - ceous and from a second oxidation front during the mid-Tertiary. The source of uranium is important in understanding how the Grants deposits formed. Two possible sources exist: 1) the Zuni Mountains, which lie south of the district and consist of a Proterozoic granitic highland enriched in uranium with as much as 11 parts per million, and with high heat flow; and 2) vol - canic rocks erupted from a Jurassic arc volcanism, which formed southwest of the San Juan Basin, and deposited ash over much of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaco Landscapes: Data, Theory and Management
    Chaco Landscapes: Data, Theory and Management Ruth Van Dyke, Stephen Lekson, and Carrie Heitman with a contribution by Julian Thomas February 25, 2016 Draft report submitted as partial fulfillment of CESU Master Agreement P14AC00979, Project Number: UCOB-109 to Chaco Culture National Historical Park, New Mexico by the University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado CONTENTS User’s Guide THE CHACO LANDSCAPE I. Introduction: Chaco in Time & Space II. Management History III. Landscape: Theoretical Background IV. Defining the Chaco Landscape: Part I – Materials V. Anthropological Research Issues on the Chacoan Landscape A. Chaco’s Boundaries in Time and Space B. Sociopolitical Organization/Complexity C. Exchange & Interaction D. Indigenous Relationships to the Chacoan Landscape E. Dwellings in Places VI. Defining the Chacoan Landscape: Part II – Experiences A. Viewsheds B. Day and Night Skies C. Soundscapes D. Oral Histories VII. Management Considerations APPENDICES Appendix I: Landscape in Canyon-Outlier Models Appendix II: Management Considerations Appendix III: Landscape: Theoretical Background A. Settlement Pattern Studies and GIS B. Cultural Landscapes C. Phenomenology Appendix IV: Defining the Chacoan Landscape A. An Outlier List and Map Example B. Examples of Outlier Diversity C. Roads D. Shrines and Related Features Appendix V: Chaco Landscapes - Some Suggestions from the Old World, by Julian Thomas Appendix VI: Defining the Chacoan Landscape: Part II – Experiences A. Viewsheds B. Day and Night Skies C. Soundscapes REFERENCES i ii User’s Guide This paper, informally termed the “White Paper,” presents current anthropological theory, methods, and research on Chacoan landscapes at several scales. The paper consists of 17 pages of text which summarize anthropological and management issues, supported by 45 pages of Appendices and a list of References cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • US Pagans and Indigenous Americans: Land and Identity
    religions Article US Pagans and Indigenous Americans: Land and Identity Lisa A. McLoughlin Independent Scholar, Northfield, MA 01360, USA; [email protected] Received: 2 January 2019; Accepted: 27 February 2019; Published: 1 March 2019 Abstract: In contrast to many European Pagan communities, ancestors and traditional cultural knowledge of Pagans in the United States of America (US Pagans) are rooted in places we no longer reside. Written from a US Pagan perspective, for an audience of Indigenous Americans, Pagans, and secondarily scholars of religion, this paper frames US Paganisms as bipartite with traditional and experiential knowledge; explores how being transplanted from ancestral homelands affects US Pagans’ relationship to the land we are on, to the Indigenous people of that land, and any contribution these may make to the larger discussion of indigeneity; and works to dispel common myths about US Pagans by offering examples of practices that the author suggests may be respectful to Indigenous American communities, while inviting Indigenous American comments on this assessment. Keywords: US Pagans; Indigenous Americans; identity; land; cultural appropriation; indigeneity 1. Introduction Indigenous American scholar Vine Deloria Jr. (Deloria 2003, pp. 292–93) contends: “That a fundamental element of religion is an intimate relationship with the land on which the religion is practiced should be a major premise of future theological concern.” Reading of Indigenous American and Pagan literatures1 indicates that both communities, beyond simply valuing their relationship with the land, consider it as part of their own identity. As for example, in this 1912 Indigenous American quote: “The soil you see is not ordinary soil—it is the dust of the blood, the flesh, and the bones of our ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • FEIS for Arizona Snowbowl Facilities Improvements
    United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Forest Service Impact Statement Southwestern Region for Arizona Snowbowl February 2005 Facilities Improvements Volume 2 Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Coconino National Forest Coconino County, Arizona FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE ARIZONA SNOWBOWL FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSAL VOLUME 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COCONINO NATIONAL FOREST COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA FEBRUARY 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................1 1.0 NEPA PROCESS...........................................................................................................................................3 2.0 USFS POLICY.............................................................................................................................................13 3.0 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE......................................................................................................................19 4.0 MODIFIED ALTERNATIVES..................................................................................................................21 5.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................25 6.0 WATER RESOURCES ..............................................................................................................................40
    [Show full text]
  • Coconino National Forest Draft Land Management Plan – February 2011 Iii
    United States Coconino National Department of Agriculture Forest Forest Draft Land Service Southwestern Region Management Plan February 2011 Notes for reviewers: • This document is an initial draft of the Coconino National Forest’s revised land management plan. It was made available for public review in February 2011. • Language highlighted in gray is incomplete or needs further attention. Draft Revised Land Management Plan Prepared for: The Coconino National Forest 1824 S. Thompson St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 and USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region 333 Broadway SE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 Submitted by: Plan Revision Team Coconino National Forest Contents Draft Revised Land Management Plan ........... i Chapter 1. Background ................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Land Management Plan .................................................................................... 1 Summary of the Analysis of the Management Situation ........................................................... 1 Plan Content .............................................................................................................................. 2 Plan Decisions ..................................................................................................................... 2 Other Content .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Stand-Replacing Fire in Upper Montane Forests of the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau, Southwestern USA
    Fire Ecology Volume 7, Issue 3, 2011 Margolis et al.: Historical Stand-Replacing Fire doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0703088 Page 88 RESEARCH ARTICLE HISTORICAL STAND-REPLACING FIRE IN UPPER MONTANE FORESTS OF THE MADREAN SKY ISLANDS AND MOGOLLON PLATEAU, SOUTHWESTERN USA Ellis Q. Margolis1*, Thomas W. Swetnam1, and Craig D. Allen2 1University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, 105 W. Stadium, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 2US Geological Survey Jemez Mountains Field Station, HCR 1, Box 1, Number 15, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA *Corresponding author: Tel.: 001-520-626-2733; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The recent occurrence of large fires with a substantial stand-replacing component in the southwestern United States (e.g., Cerro Grande, 2000; Rodeo-Chedeski, 2002; Aspen, 2003; Horseshoe 2, Las Conchas, and Wallow, 2011) has raised questions about the his- torical role of stand-replacing fire in the region. We reconstructed fire dates and stand-re- placing fire patch sizes using four lines of tree-ring evidence at four upper montane forest sites (>2600 m) in the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau of Arizona and New Mexico, USA. The four lines of tree-ring evidence include: (1) quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and spruce-fir age structure, (2) conifer death dates, (3) traumatic resin ducts and ring-width changes, and (4) conifer fire scars. Pre-1905 fire regimes in the upper montane forest sites were variable, with drier, south-facing portions of some sites record- ing frequent, low-severity fire (mean fire interval of all fires ranging from 5 yr to 11 yr among sites), others burning with stand-replacing severity, and others with no evidence of fire for >300 yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]