DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraoh numbers Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 - 1.10 Chapter 2 The 1891 Boundary Convention Did Not Affect the Disputed Islands The Territorial Title Alleged by Indonesia Background to the Boundary Convention of 20 June 189 1 The Negotiations for the 189 1 Convention The Survey by HMS Egeria, HMS Rattler and HNLMS Banda, 30 May - 19 June 1891 The Interpretation of the 189 1 Boundary Convention The Ratification of the Boundary Convention and the Map The Subsequent 19 15 Agreement General Conclusions Chapter 3 Malaysia's Right to the Islands Based on Actual Administration Combined with a Treaty Title A. Introduction 3.1 - 3.4 B. The East Coast Islands of Borneo, Sulu and Spain 3.5 - 3.16 C. Transactions between Britain (on behalf of North Borneo) and the United States 3.17 - 3.28 D. Conclusion 3.29 Chapter 4 The Practice of the Parties and their Predecessors Confirms Malaysia's Title A. Introduction B. Practice Relating to the Islands before 1963 C. Post-colonial Practice D. General Conclusions Chapter 5 Officia1 and other Maps Support Malaysia's Title to the Islands A. Introduction 5.1 - 5.3 B. Indonesia's Arguments Based on Various Maps 5.4 - 5.30 C. The Relevance of Maps in Determining Disputed Boundaries 5.31 - 5.36 D. Conclusions from the Map Evidence as a Whole 5.37 - 5.39 Submissions List of Annexes Appendix 1 The Regional History of Northeast Bomeo in the Nineteenth Century (with special reference to Bulungan) by Prof. Dr. Vincent J. H. Houben Table of Inserts Insert Descri~tion page 1. North Borneo Coast and Sulu Archipelago circa 1891 Opposite 1 2. Plan Showing the Result of the Determination of Parallel of 4" 10' N on East Coast Borneo and Examination of Rivers in Vicinity, June 1891 3. Routes of HMS Egeria and HNLMS Banda, 1891 and 1892 4. Map accompanying the 1915 Agreement relating to the Boundary between the State of North Bomeo and the Netherlands Possessions in Bomeo (extract) 5. Boundary Lines referred to in the letter of the Commander of Naval Forces, 9 August 1922 6. Sketch map showing Boundary Lines referred to in the letter of Commander Naval Forces, 9 August 1922 7. Map attached to Indonesian Act No. 4 of 1960 (extract) 8. Map of PERMINAIJAPEX Concession 1966 Insert Description page Sheet Noord (North) A-50, "Oost Borneo" (1935) (extract) Opposite 97 Survey Map of the Netherlands East Indies Archipelago (1897 - 1904) 101 Map showing the Administrative Division of the Southern and Eastern Borneo Residence (19 13) (extract) Map 25, Atlas of the Tropical Netherlands ( 1938) (extract) Sheet Noord (North) B-50 North Borneo (194 1) (extract) Map of Kalimantan Utara (1965) (extract) Map of Kalimantan Utara (1968) (extract) Sheet NB 50 "Bandar Seri Begawan" (1976) (extract) Map of Kalimantan Utara (1992) (extract) Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1. This is the Counter-Memorial of Malaysia in the present proceedings, filed pursuant to the Order of the President made on 1 1 May 2000. It responds to the Memorial of the Republic of Indonesia of 2 November 1999. The geographical setting 1.2. Before turning to summarise the cases of the two parties as presented in their respective memorials, it is useful to recall the geographical setting of the dispute. Insert 1, opposite, shows that setting, with key place names as they were (or were thought to be) at about the time of the 1891 Anglo-Dutch Boundary Convention, on which the Indonesian case bangs.' The case concerns two small islands off the Coast of North Borneo, part of a group of small islands and reefs surrounding the Semporna Peninsula. 1.3. It is useful to review the European understanding of the geography of the two islands at the time of the 1891 Boundary Convention. Useful for this purpose are the contemporary sailing directories or pilots, to which mariners and other Europeans concerned with the region would have referred. Annex 1 to this Counter-Memorial extracts the relevant pages from the directory entitled Eastern Archipelago, Part I (Eastern Part), published in London for the Hydrographic Office of the Admiralty in 1890.~ Under the general rubric of "Darvel Bay", it deals with a series of locations (settlements, islands, reefs, etc.) running from north to south. The entry for the Ligitan islands reads as follows: I For the 189 1 Boundary Convention see Annex MM 17, vol. 2, p. 70. 2 J.P. Maclear (comp.), Eastern Archipelago, Part 1 (Eastern Part) (London, Hydrographic Office, Adrniralty, 1890) pp. 182-191; Annex MCM 1, vol. 2, pp. 1- 11. "Ligitan is1ands.-Of this group, lying off the north coast of Sibuko bay there is very little information, but they appear to be surrounded by dangers. Si Amil, the north-easternmost, appears by the chart to be wedge-shaped, and 800 feet high; Danawan, to the westward of it, appears to be low. A small islet with a few shrubs on it lies in latitude 4" 12Y2' N., longitude 118" 54' E. From it, Si Ami1 island bears N. 5" W. Reefs extend 4 or 5 miles from this islet in an easterly direction, and it appears to be connected by a reef to Si Amil; this reef is dangerous, as there are no symptoms except breakers about one mile eastward of the islet. Sipadan, the southemmost of the group, is 120 feet high. Coming from the eastward Sipadan should be kept to the northward of West, as the extent of the reefs to the eastward of it has not been determined; they do not appear to the southward of the i~land."~ The directory then goes on to deal with Sibuko or St. Lucia Bay. It refers inter alia to Batu Tinagat point, and notes "the entrance of the little river Tawao, on the left bank of which the Dutch have a small ~ettlement",~as well as to Sebatik island and the Sibuko river. 1.4. The passage is of considerable interest. It names three of the four Ligitan islands (Si Amil, Danawan and Sipadan), but does not name Ligitan itself, which from the description given and its bearing to Si Ami1 one can nonetheless identify as the "small islet". It treats al1 four islands as part of the Ligitan group, and treats them in conjunction with other islands and features associated with Darvel ~a~.'It notes that Si Ami1 and the small islet (Ligitan) are physically connected by a reef, but in other respects shows considerable uncertainty about the geography and the navigational hazards: for example it is unclear to the compiler whether there are reefs to the 3 Ibid., pp. 187-8. 4 Ibid., p. 190. 5 Commander Field of the Egeria drew heavily on these sailing directions in his hand-written notes which are at Annex IM 90, vol. 3, p. 239. Again Sipadan is treated as part of the Ligitan Group and Ligitan itself is not named: its position is only given approximately. eastwards of Sipadan (in fact there are not, since Sipadan is an oceanic pillar). Of particular note for present purposes is that it locates Ligitan in the wrong longitude, though in approximately the correct latitude. The position is as follows: Coordinates of Ligitan 1890 Directorv Actual Lat: 4" 12Y2' N. lat: 4" 09' 48" N Long: 118" 54' E. long: 118" 53' 04" E. The coordinates of Sipadan are not given. The directory also notes (as if by way of exception) the existence of a small Dutch settlement on the left bank of the Tawao River at its entrance, and the availability of information about Sebatik from Dutch charts. Otherwise al1 references are to British vessels, settlements and surveys. The basis of the Indonesian case 1.5. As developed in its Memorial, the Indonesian case does not differ from that disclosed in earlier negotiations, going back to 1969 when the Indonesian claim to the islands was first made. In its essentials, Indonesia argues that: (a) The islands were part of the dominions of the sultanate of Bulungan under Dutch protection and sovereignty; (b) There was a dispute concerning the islands between the Netherlands and Britain (on behalf of North Borneo) before 1891; (c) The dispute was resolved in favour of the Netherlands by the 1891 Boundary Convention, because the Convention can be seen (with the crucial aid of an internai Dutch map) to have drawn not only a boundary but an allocation line, running eastwards along the parallel of 4" 10' N, placing the islands under Dutch sovereignty; (d) The Netherlands and subsequently Indonesia retained the sovereignty attributed to them in 1891, despite the fact that they never exercised administrative control or jurisdiction over the islands. 1.6. This argument faces severe difficulties. They include the following: (a) There is no evidence whatever that the claims of the Sultan of Bulungan extended to the islands or that he exercised the slightest authority there; al1 the evidence is to the contrary; (b) Al1 descriptions of the boundary dispute before 1891, whether given by Dutch or British officials, make it clear that the dispute concerned exclusively the area to the West and south of Batu Tinagat, and had nothing to do with islands further to the east; (c) The 189 1 Boundary Convention cannot bear the interpretation Indonesia prefers, which is also flatly contradicted by the Anglo-Dutch Agreement of 1915 and the attached, agreed map; (d) The intemal Dutch map, even if it did support that view (and it is equivocal), is inadmissible as evidence of the intention of the parties, and even if it was admissible, it could not prevail over the express terms of the Convention; (e) The Netherlands cannot have gained in 1891 sovereignty over islands which then belonged to a third State (Spain) and which were subsequently ceded to Great Britain without any protest whatever by the Netherlands, or any action to sustain the claim now made.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Island of Palmas Case: Mere Proximity Was Not an Adequate Claim to Land Island of Palmas Case, (Scott, Hague Court Reports 2D 83 (1932), (Perm
    island of Palmas case: mere proximity was not an adequate claim to land Island of Palmas Case, (Scott, Hague Court Reports 2d 83 (1932), (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1928), 2 U.N. Rep. Intl. Arb. Awards 829), was a case involving a territorial dispute over the Island of Palmas (or Miangas) between the Netherlands and the United States which was heard by the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The Island of Palmas (known as Pulau Miangas in Bahasa Indonesian) is now within Indonesian sovereignty. This case is one of the most highly influential precedents dealing with island territorial conflicts. Facts of the case Palmas, also referred to as Miangas, is an island of little economic value or strategic location. It is two miles in length, three-quarters of a mile in width, and had a population of about 750 when the decision of the arbitrator was handed down. The island is located between Mindanao, Philippines and the northern most island, known as Nanusa, of what was the former Netherlands East Indies. In 1898, Spain ceded the Philippines to the United States in the Treaty of Paris (1898) and Palmas sat within the boundaries of that cession to the U.S. In 1906, the United States discovered that the Netherlands also claimed sovereignty over the island, and the two parties agreed to submit to binding arbitration by the Permanent Court of Arbitration. On January 23, 1925, the two government signed an agreement to that effect. Ratifications were exchanged in Washington on April 1, 1925. The agreement was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on May 19, 1925.[1] The arbitrator in the case was Max Huber, a Swiss national.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest, Resources and People in Bulungan Elements for a History of Settlement, Trade, and Social Dynamics in Borneo, 1880-2000
    CIFOR Forest, Resources and People in Bulungan Elements for a History of Settlement, Trade, and Social Dynamics in Borneo, 1880-2000 Bernard Sellato Forest, Resources and People in Bulungan Elements for a History of Settlement, Trade and Social Dynamics in Borneo, 1880-2000 Bernard Sellato Cover Photo: Hornbill carving in gate to Kenyah village, East Kalimantan by Christophe Kuhn © 2001 by Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved. Published in 2001 Printed by SMK Grafika Desa Putera, Indonesia ISBN 979-8764-76-5 Published by Center for International Forestry Research Mailing address: P.O. Box 6596 JKPWB, Jakarta 10065, Indonesia Office address: Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede, Sindang Barang, Bogor Barat 16680, Indonesia Tel.: +62 (251) 622622; Fax: +62 (251) 622100 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org Contents Acknowledgements vi Foreword vii 1. Introduction 1 2. Environment and Population 5 2.1 One Forested Domain 5 2.2 Two River Basins 7 2.3 Population 9 Long Pujungan District 9 Malinau District 12 Comments 13 3. Tribes and States in Northern East Borneo 15 3.1 The Coastal Polities 16 Bulungan 17 Tidung Sesayap 19 Sembawang24 3.2 The Stratified Groups 27 The Merap 28 The Kenyah 30 3.3 The Punan Groups 32 Minor Punan Groups 32 The Punan of the Tubu and Malinau 33 3.4 One Regional History 37 CONTENTS 4. Territory, Resources and Land Use43 4.1 Forest and Resources 44 Among Coastal Polities 44 Among Stratified Tribal Groups 46 Among Non-Stratified Tribal Groups 49 Among Punan Groups 50 4.2 Agricultural Patterns 52 Rice Agriculture 53 Cash Crops 59 Recent Trends 62 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Tributes1.Pdf
    Tributes for Widjojo Nitisastro by Friends from 27 Foreign Countries Law No.19 of 2002 regarding Copyrights Article 2: 1. Copyrights constitute exclusively rights for Author or Copyrights Holder to publish or copy the Creation, which emerge automatically after a creation is published without abridge restrictions according the law which prevails here. Penalties Article 72: 2. Anyone intentionally and without any entitlement referred to Article 2 paragraph (1) or Article 49 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) is subject to imprisonment of no shorter than 1 month and/or a fine minimal Rp 1.000.000,00 (one million rupiah), or imprisonment of no longer than 7 years and/or a fine of no more than Rp 5.000.000.000,00 (five billion rupiah). 3. Anyone intentionally disseminating, displaying, distributing, or selling to the public a creation or a product resulted by a violation of the copyrights referred to under paragraph (1) is subject to imprisonment of no longer than 5 years and/or a fine of no more than Rp 500.000.000,00 (five hundred million rupiah). Tributes for Widjojo Nitisastro by Friends from 27 Foreign Countries Editors: Moh. Arsjad Anwar Aris Ananta Ari Kuncoro Kompas Book Publishing Jakarta, January 2007 Tributes for Widjojo Nitisastro by Friends from 27 Foreign Countries Published by Kompas Book Pusblishing, Jakarta, January 2007 PT Kompas Media Nusantara Jalan Palmerah Selatan 26-28, Jakarta 10270 e-mail: [email protected] KMN 70007006 Editor: Moh. Arsjad Anwar, Aris Ananta, and Ari Kuncoro Copy editor: Gangsar Sambodo and Bagus Dharmawan Cover design by: Gangsar Sambodo and A.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Tsunami Hazard in Sabah – Level of Threat, Constraints and Future Work Felix Tongkul*, Rodeano Roslee, Ahmad Khairut Termizi Mohd Daud
    Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, Volume 70, November 2020, pp. 1 - 15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm70202001 Assessment of tsunami hazard in Sabah – Level of threat, constraints and future work Felix Tongkul*, Rodeano Roslee, Ahmad Khairut Termizi Mohd Daud Natural Disaster Research Centre (NDRC) Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia * Corresponding author email address: [email protected] Abstract: The coastal areas of Sabah are exposed to far-field earthquake-induced tsunamis that could be generated along the trenches of Manila, Negros, Sulu, Cotabato, Sangihe and North Sulawesi. Tsunami simulation models from these trenches indicated that tsunami waves can reach the coast of Sabah between 40 and 120 minutes with tsunami wave heights reaching up to 3 m near the coast. The level of tsunami threat is high in southeast Sabah due to its narrow continental shelf and proximity to tsunami source in the North Sulawesi Trench. The level of tsunami threat is moderate in north and east Sabah due to their proximity to tsunami source in the Sulu Trench. The level of tsunami threat is low in west Sabah due to its distant location to tsunami source from the Manila Trench. While tsunamis cannot be prevented, its impact on human life and property can be reduced through proper assessment of its threat using tsunami simulation models. Unfortunately, constraints remain in producing a reliable tsunami inundation models due to the lack of high-resolution topography and bathymetry data in Sabah and surrounding seas. It would be helpful if such data can be acquired by the relevant government agencies, at least first, in high threat-level areas, such as Tawau and Semporna districts.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 the Land Capability Classification of Sabah Volume 1 the Tawau Residency
    25 The land capability classification of Sabah Volume 1 The Tawau Residency OdEXäxo] ßte©@x>a?®^ ®(^ Scanned from original by ISRIC - World Soil Information, as ICSU World Data Centre for Soils. The purpose is to make a safe depository for endangered documents and to make the accrued information available for consultation, following Fair Use Guidelines. Every effort is taken to respect Copyright of the materials within the archives where the identification of the Copyright holder is clear and, where feasible, to contact the originators. For questions please contact [email protected] indicating the item reference number concerned. The land capability classification of Sabah Volume 1 The Tawau Residency T-i2>S Land Resources Division The land capability classification of Sabah Volume 1 The Tawau Residency (with an Introduction and Summary for Volumes 1—4) P Thomas, F K C Lo and A J Hepburn Land Resource Study 25 Land Resources Division, Ministry of Overseas Development Tolworth Tower, Surbiton, Surrey, England KT6 7DY 1976 THE LAND RESOURCES DIVISION The Land Resources Division of the Ministry of Overseas Development assists develop­ ing countries in mapping, investigating and assessing land resources, and makes recommendations on the use of these resources for the development of agriculture, livestock husbandry and forestry; it also gives advice on related subjects to overseas governments and organisations, makes scientific personnel available for appointment abroad and provides lectures and training courses in the basic techniques of resource appraisal. The Division works in close cooperation with government departments, research institutes, universities and international organisations concerned with land resource assessment and development planning.
    [Show full text]
  • KITLV Healers on the Colonial Market Def.Indd 1 10-11-11 11:34 HEALERS on the C OLONIAL MARKET
    Healers on the colonial market Healers on the colonial market is one of the few studies on the Healers on the Dutch East Indies from a postcolonial perspective. It provides an enthralling addition to research on both the history of the Dutch East Indies and the history of colonial medicine. This book will be colonial market of interest to historians, historians of science and medicine, and anthropologists. Native doctors and midwives How successful were the two medical training programmes in the Dutch East Indies established in Jakarta by the colonial government in 1851? One was a medical school for Javanese boys, and the other a school for midwives for Javanese girls, and the graduates were supposed to replace native healers, the dukun. However, the indigenous Native doctors and midwives in the Dutch East Indies population was not prepared to use the services of these doctors and midwives. Native doctors did in fact prove useful as vaccinators and assistant doctors, but the school for midwives was closed in 1875. Even though there were many horror stories of mistakes made during dukun-assisted deliveries, the school was not reopened, and instead a handful of girls received practical training from European physicians. Under the Ethical Policy there was more attention for the welfare of the indigenous population and the need for doctors increased. More native boys received medical training and went to work as general practitioners. Nevertheless, not everybody accepted these native doctors as the colleagues of European physicians. Liesbeth Hesselink (1943) received a PhD in the history of medicine from the University of Amsterdam in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • WSJ Vanishing Asia062708.Pdf
    0vtdt0vtdt ASIAN ARTS & CULTURE SPECIAL Q`tjhjtf -j` 10 Mhd pdf`b ve C`p`bb` 16 ;tcj` 0hjtdd cj`wv}` 19 8vtf jt .djkjtf -}aj}`fd w}jbd bhdbm 3 ¡ 5`hjvt 25 ¡ M`d 28 ¡ 8j Aj Jddt ve hd c}`wd Mhd `} ve fp` jt =`w`t 0vtdqwv}`} 4 ¡ Lwv} 26 ¡ Mjqd Gee `}j 5dtf Zhdtfkjd vw .}jtf j vtª av 0j}b jt .djkjtf Avtcvt `} qdq 6 ¡ 5vvc 1}jtm Kv`p .`ppd jt 8vtf ?vtf 1jtd l.d` hd Mhd 1jhI 8`tvj whv .d` qjb`p jt ?`p` H`w` 1vapd Aqw} lTjbmdc qjb`p 8 ¡ M}`dp jt Cdpav}td 0dppv bvtbd} 0j T`pmI 8vtf ?vtf jt Ldvp 5jpq edj`p jt 24 ¡ .vvm Lctd Kjd}c`tbd v} -j` O}a`t pdfdtc WSJ.com Cover: A 1930s photograph found torn and discarded in a Malacca Weekend Journal online building (Lim Huck Chin and See slideshows of Malacca’s heritage Fernando Jorge) S. Karene Witcher Editor and India’s Chinese diaspora, plus This page: Ng Ah Kee at the Sin view a video of our latest City Walk— Jessica Yu News graphics director See Tai barbershop in Malacca (Lim David Chan Hong Kong—at WSJ.com/Travel Art director Huck Chin and Fernando Jorge), Mary E. Kissel Taste page editor top; Shockers cheerleading team email [email protected] For more on Japan’s all-male (Steve West), left; ‘Pies de Plomo cheerleading squad Shockers, see (Zapateado Luz),’ by Rubén Ramos ? x {t WSJ.com/Sports Balsa (Rubén Ramos Balsa), right M83 T-AA LMK33M =GOKE-A -L;-+ 5`hjvt Dresses by Madame Grès show her signature draping, left, and kimono sleeves, right; New York vintage collector Juliana Cairone, Mhd pv fvccdd center, at her store How a rare collection of vintage gowns was found .
    [Show full text]
  • 399 International Court of Justice Case Between Indonesia And
    International Court of Justice Case between Indonesia and Malaysia Concerning Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan Introduction On 2 November 1998 Indonesia and Malaysia jointly seised the International Court of Justice (ICJ) of their dispute concerning sovereignty over the islands of Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan in the Celebes Sea.' They did so by notifying the Court of a Special Agreement between the two states, signed in Kuala Lumpur on 31 May 1997 and which entered into force on 14 May 1998 upon the exchange of ratifying instruments. In the Special Agreement, the two parties request the Court "to determine on the basis of the treaties, agreements and other evidence furnished by [the two parties], whether sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan belongs to the Republic of Indonesia or Malaysia". The parties expressed the wish to settle their dispute "in the spirit of friendly relations existing between [them] as enunciated in the 1976 Treaty of Amity and Co-operation in Southeast Asia" and declared in advance that they will "accept the Judgement of the Court given pursuant to [the] Special Agreement as final and binding upon them." On 10 November 1998 the ICJ made an Order' fixing the time limits for the respective initial pleadings in the case as follows: 2 November 1999 for the filing by each of the parties of a Memorial; and 2 March 2000 for the filing of the counter-memorials. By this order the Court also reserved subsequent procedure on this case for future decision. In fixing the time limits for the initial written pleadings, the Court took account and applied the wishes expressed by the two parties in Article 3, paragraph 2 of their Special Agreement wherein they provided that the written pleadings should consist of: 1 International Court of Justice, Press Communique 98/35, 2 November 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: a Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System
    Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: John O. Haley, Chair Michael E. Townsend Beth E. Rivin Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Law © Copyright 2015 Yu Un Oppusunggu ii University of Washington Abstract Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor John O. Haley School of Law A sweeping proviso that protects basic or fundamental interests of a legal system is known in various names – ordre public, public policy, public order, government’s interest or Vorbehaltklausel. This study focuses on the concept of Indonesian public order in private international law. It argues that Indonesia has extraordinary layers of pluralism with respect to its people, statehood and law. Indonesian history is filled with the pursuit of nationhood while protecting diversity. The legal system has been the unifying instrument for the nation. However the selected cases on public order show that the legal system still lacks in coherence. Indonesian courts have treated public order argument inconsistently. A prima facie observation may find Indonesian public order unintelligible, and the courts have gained notoriety for it. This study proposes a different perspective. It sees public order in light of Indonesia’s legal pluralism and the stages of legal development.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Disaster Resilience of Indonesian Cities – a Policy Note
    SEPTEMBER 2019 STRENGTHENING THE Public Disclosure Authorized DISASTER RESILIENCE OF INDONESIAN CITIES – A POLICY NOTE Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Background Urbanization Time to ACT: Realizing Paper Flagship Report Indonesia’s Urban Potential Public Disclosure Authorized STRENGTHENING THE DISASTER RESILIENCE OF INDONESIAN CITIES – A POLICY NOTE Urban floods have significant impacts on the livelihoods and mobility of Indonesians, affecting access to employment opportunities and disrupting local economies. (photos: Dani Daniar, Jakarta) Acknowledgement This note was prepared by World Bank staff and consultants as input into the Bank’s Indonesia Urbanization Flagship report, Time to ACT: Realizing Indonesia’s Urban Potential, which can be accessed here: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31304. The World Bank team was led by Jolanta Kryspin-Watson, Lead Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Jian Vun, Infrastructure Specialist, Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, Disaster Risk Management Specialist, and Gian Sandosh Semadeni, Disaster Risk Management Consultant. The paper was peer reviewed by World Bank staff including Alanna Simpson, Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist, Abigail Baca, Senior Financial Officer, and Brenden Jongman, Young Professional. The background work, including technical analysis of flood risk, for this report received financial support from the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) through the World Bank Indonesia Sustainable Urbanization (IDSUN) Multi-Donor Trust Fund. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. ii STRENGTHENING THE DISASTER RESILIENCE OF INDONESIAN CITIES – A POLICY NOTE THE WORLD BANK Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the International Commercial Contract Law: the Framework of Implementation to Establish the ASEAN Economy Community 2015
    Governing the International Commercial Contract Law: The Framework of Implementation to Establish the ASEAN Economy Community 2015 Taufiqurrahman, University of Wijaya Putra, Indonesia Budi Endarto, University of Wijaya Putra, Indonesia The Asian Conference on Business and Public Policy 2015 Official Conference Proceedings Abstract The Head of the State Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in Summit of Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in 2007 on Cebu, Manila agreed to accelerate the implementation of ASEAN Economy Community (AEC), which was originally 2020 to 2015. This means that within the next seven months, the people of Indonesia and ASEAN member countries more integrated into one large house named AEC. This in turn will further encourage increased volume of international trade, both by the domestic consumers to foreign businesses, among foreign consumers by domestic businesses, as well as between foreign entrepreneurs with domestic businesses. As a result, the potential for legal disputes between the parties in international trade transactions can not be avoided. Therefore, the existence of the contract law of international commercial law in order to provide maximum protection for the parties to a transaction are indispensable. The existence of this legal regime will provide great benefit to all parties to a transaction to minimize disputes. This study aims to assess the significance of the governing of International Commercial Contract Law for Indonesia in the framework of the implementation of establishing the AEC 2015 and also to find legal principles underlying governing the International Commercial Contracts Law for Indonesia in the framework of the implementation of establishing the AEC 2015 so as to provide a valuable contribution to the development of Indonesian national law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Dokdo
    Resolution of Territorial Disputes in East Asia: The Case of Dokdo Laurent Mayali & John Yoo* This Article seeks to contribute to solving of the Korea-Japan territorial dispute over Dokdo island (Korea)/Takeshima (Japanese). The Republic of Korea argues that Dokdo has formed a part of Korea since as early as 512 C.E.; as Korea currently exercises control over the island, its claim to discovery would appear to fulfill the legal test for possession of territory. Conversely, the Japanese government claims that Korea never exercised sufficient sovereignty over Dokdo. Japan claims that the island remained terra nullius—in other words, territory not possessed by any nation and so could be claimed—until it annexed Dokdo in 1905. Japan also claims that in the 1951 peace treaty ending World War II, the Allies did not include Dokdo in the list of islands taken from Japan, which implies that Japan retained the island in the postwar settlement. This article makes three contributions. First, it brings forward evidence from the maps held at various archives in the United States and Western Europe to determine the historical opinions of experts and governments about the possession of Dokdo. Second, it clarifies the factors that have guided international tribunals in their resolution of earlier disputes involving islands and maritime territory. Third, it shows how the claim of terra nullius has little legitimate authority when applied to East Asia, an area where empires, kingdoms, and nation-states had long exercised control over territory. * Laurent Mayali is the Lloyd M. Robbins Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley School of Law; John Yoo is the Emanuel S.
    [Show full text]