Western Legal History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Western Legal History WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL ISSUE: FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VOLUME 28, NUMBER 2 201 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawai'i, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50499; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright @2015, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal. Manuscripts (three copies, and one disk in Microsoft Word for Windows, if possible) should be sent to the Editor, Western Legal History, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105. Texts, including quotations and endnotes, must be double spaced. Notes must be numbered consecutively and appear in a separate section at the end of the text. Authors are requested to follow the style for citations used in this journal. Manuscripts that are no more than thirty pages in length, not counting notes, charts and tables, and photographs, are preferred. Also preferred are manuscripts not concurrently under consideration by another journal. Whether because of prejudice or custom, writers in earlier times often used language considered strange or offensive today. Because Western Legal History publishes articles that present the historical record as accurately as possible, it occasionally publishes quotations containing such language. The publication of such is not to be construed as representing the attitudes of either the authors or Western Legal History. Communication with the editor is encouraged before submission of any manuscript. At that time, other guidelines for the preparation and publication of an article may be discussed. Consultation about punctuation, grammar, style, and the like is made with the author, although the editor and the Editorial Board are the final arbiters of the article's acceptance and appearance. Articles published in this journal are abstracted and indexed in America: History and Life; HistoricalAbstracts; the Index to Legal Periodicals;and the Legal Resources Index. NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS GARETH T. EvANs, ESo. ADVISORY COUNCIL Chair J. BRUCE ALVERSON, ESQ. PAUL T. FRIEDMAN, ESQ. Vice Chair LADD A. BAUMANN, ESo. RITA M. HAEusLER, ESQ. HoN. MARSHA S. BERZON Treasurer BETH MARY BOLLINGER, EsQ. WILLIAM I. EDLUND, Eso. Secretary HON. CHRISTI E W. BYRD JEFFREY M. FISHER, EsQ. A. MARISA CHUN, Eso. Immediate Past Chair DANIEL P. COLLINS, Eso. SETH ARONSON, ESQ. HON. MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. JEROME 1. BRAUN, ESQ. PARKER C. FOLSE III, ESQ. JOHN CARSON, ESQ. FREDERICK P. FURTH, EsQ. HON. DAVID 0. CARTER HELKEI S. HEMMINGER, EsQ. HON. RICHARD R. CLIFTON ERNEST A. HoiDAL, EsQ. ROBERT H. FAIRBANK, EsQ. HON. PROCTER HUG, JR. DONALD L. GAFFNEY, ESQ. HON. SUSAN Y. ILLSTON GERSHAM GOLDSTEIN, ESQ. PROF. COLIN JONES KiRY K. GRAY B. ANN KEITH, EsQ. PETER F. HABEIN, ESQ. KENNETH N. KLEE, ESQ. DEBORAH K. KRISTENSEN, ESQ. RON MAROKo, Eso. ROBERT D. LOWRY, ESQ. SONIA R. MARTIN, ESQ. THOMAS J. McDERMOTT, JR., EsQ. HOWARD G. MCPHERSON, ESQ. HoN. M. MARGARET McKEOWN DIANE M. MYERS, ESQ. HON. WILLIAM ORRICK III TERRY NAFISI JEFFREY R. PORTNOY, ESQ. HON. RANDALL NEWSOME HON. MANUEL L. REAL HON. DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN HON. PAUL G. ROSENBLATT WILLIAM D, PICKETT, Eso. HON. MARY M. SCHROEDER PER A. RAMFJORD, Eso. MARC M. SELTZER, ESQ. ARTHUR F. ROECA, ESQ. HON. MILAN D. SMITH, JR. JoY SHOWMAKER HON. CHRISTINA ANN SNYDER GAIL MIcDAL TITLE, ESQ. HON. SIDNEY R. THOMAS ROBERT S. WARREN, EsQ. DEAN A. ZIEHL, ESQ. DOUGLAS R. YOUNG, Eso. MERYL L. YOUNG, ESO. WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY BRADLEY B. WILLIAMS, EDITOR BETHANY PHILLIPS, Cory EDITOR JUDITH FORMAN, PRODUCTION EDITOR S. DEBORAH KANG, BOOK REVIEw EDITOR EDITORIAL BOARD JUDITH AUSTIN KATRINA JAGODINSKY Boise University of Nebraska, MICHAL BELKNAP Lincoln California Western DAVID J. LANGUM School of Law Samford University ELIZABETH J. CABRASER, ESQ. Cumberland School of Law San Francisco R. JAMES MOONEY of Oregon LAWRENCE M. FRIEDMAN University Law School Stanford Law School PAULA PETRIK, PH.D. CHRISTIAN G. FRITZ George Mason University University of New Mexico School of Law PETER L. REICH Whittier Law School DALE GOBLE JOHN PHILLIP REID University of Idaho New York University School of Law School of Law PAUL BRYAN GRAY, ESQ. HARRY N. SCHEIBER, PH.D. Claremont University of California MICHAEL GRIFFITH, PH.D. Boalt Hall School of Law Oakland MOLLY SELVIN, PH.D. ARTHUR D. HELLMAN Santa Monica University of Pittsburgh ROBERT S. WOLFE, ESQ. School of Law Santa Ana WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY VOLUME 28, NUMBER 2 SUMMER/FALL 2015 CONTENTS Introduction 1 53 Janis L. Sammartino 153 The Creation of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Brittany Torbert 16U Judge Judith Nelsen Keep and Her Legacy in the Southern District of California 181 Jessica Wallach 101 Border Crossings, Internal Checkpoints, and the Fourth Amendment in the Southern District Seve Gonzales 20U De Luz Canyon: Human Tragedy at the Intersection of the Media, Jurisdiction, and Murder Crystal Vasalech Cover photo: The James M. Carter and Judith N. Keep United States Courthouse in San Diego, California, was completed in 2012. (Courtesy of the General Services Administration and the Southern District of California) vi WESTERNI LEGAL HISTORY VOL. 28, No, 2 "Strippergate": Political Corruption in America's Finest City Katherine Brown 253 Book Reviews 279 Articles of Related Interest 289 Memberships, Contributions, & Grants 293 INTRODUCTION JANIs L. SAMMARTINO Iam pleased to introduce this special edition of Western Legal History. The issue contains five student works to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the Southern District of California. The court invited the deans of our three local law schools-California Western, Thomas Jefferson, and the University of San Diego-to select students to write scholarly articles. The law students selected topics based on their personal interests, exploring some of the extraordinary individuals and significant cases in our district's history. This special issue is only the start of our effort to engage and educate the community about the contributions the federal courts make to society. I am grateful to the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society for its support of this endeavor, and to the Ninth Circuit Attorney Admissions Committee for pur- chasing the photographs from the San Diego History Center. We begin with Brittany Torbert's article on the creation of the Southern District. While those of us in San Diego refer to 1966 as the birth of the Southern District of California, it is more accurate to describe it as the year when San Diego and Imperial Counties separated from the shadow of their big, cos- mopolitan sister to the north, Los Angeles County.' Torbert's article describes the mechanics of the formation of the South- ern District, but her article is not a dry legislative history. She captures human interest stories that bring the past fifty years to life. Prior to 1966, our court operated as the southern division of the Southern District. For a full history of the federal districts in California, see George Cosgrave, "Early California Justice: The History of the U.S. District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of California 1849-1895," Western Legal History 2 (Winter/Spring 1989): 191; Hon. William Howatt, Jr., "History Brief: How the Southern District Came to Be," San Diego Lawyer (March/April 2016): 41-42. Janis L. Sammartino is a United States district judge in the Southern District of California. 154 WESTERN LEGAL HiSTORY VOL. 28, No. 2 As Torbert reports, one of the primary motivating factors to add the Southern District was the region's substantial criminal caseload. In the early years, court sessions were long. Judge Edward Schwartz recalls handling 156 law and motion matters in one long, thirteen-hour day.' He took ten min- utes for lunch and finished his criminal calendar at 9:30 that evening. While he took guilty pleas and imposed sentences for a week, his only colleague, Judge Howard B. Turrentine, would try a short criminal case or two. The next week, the two judges switched duties. "Howard Turrentine and
Recommended publications
  • Plaintiff's Notice of Motion, Motion for Final Approval of Class Action
    Case 4:19-cv-01057-HSG Document 79 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 26 Rachel E. Kaufman (CA Bar No. 259353) 1 [email protected] 2 Avi R. Kaufman (Pro hac vice) [email protected] 3 KAUFMAN P.A. 400 NW 26th Street 4 Miami, FL 33127 5 Telephone: (305) 469-5881 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Izor and all others similarly situated (Additional counsel appearing on signature page) 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ) Case No. 4:19-cv-01057-HSG 12 PAUL IZOR, individually and on behalf of all ) others similarly situated, ) PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF MOTION, 13 ) MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, 14 ) RESPONSE TO OBJECTION, AND 15 v. ) INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF ) LAW 16 ABACUS DATA SYSTEMS INC., a ) California corporation, ) Hearing Date: December 17, 2020 17 ) Hearing Time: 2:00 p.m. th 18 Defendant. ) Courtroom: 2 – 4 Floor ) Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 19 ) 20 21 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF 22 RECORD: 23 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 17, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter 24 as this matter may be heard in Courtroom 2 – 4th Floor of the United States District Court for the 25 Northern District of California, Oakland Division, located at 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 26 94612, before the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., Plaintiff Paul Izor will and hereby does 27 28 1 Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement Case no. 4:19-cv-01057-HSG Case 4:19-cv-01057-HSG Document 79 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 26 1 move the Court, by and through Class Counsel, for entry of an order granting final approval of 2 the class action settlement set forth in the Parties’ Settlement Agreement, certifying the Settlement 3 Class for settlement purposes, approving the Notice to the Settlement Class, and denying the one 4 objection to the settlement, which was filed by a non-class member.1 This Motion is based on and 5 supported by this Notice of Motion, the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the 6 Declaration of Avi R.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN DIEGO at a GLANCE San Diego at a Glance City Profile
    SAN DIEGO AT A GLANCE San Diego at a Glance City Profile With a total projected population of 1,314,600 for January 1, 2005, the City of San Diego is the seventh largest city in the nation and the second largest city in California. The City’s population grew by approximately 10% between 1990 and 2000 for an average increase of 12,375 annually. Quality of Life A major factor contributing to San Diego’s growth is the quality of life. Based on the most recent citizen survey, 79% of citizens rate their quality of life as good or excellent. Besides having one of the world’s most favorable climates, the City offers a wide range of cultural and recreational services to benefit both residents and visitors. With mild temperatures year round, the City’s many beaches, parks, tennis courts, and golf courses are in constant use. Center for Education and Research San Diego is also a center for education and research, with both public and private colleges and universities. The University of California at San Diego, San Diego State University, and the University of San Diego are three major universities in the City. The City is also served by many community colleges offering academic courses and vocational training, with the vocational courses often customized to meet the special needs of area employers. In addition to the 26 childhood development centers, there are 188 public schools in the San Diego Unified School District, including 114 elementary schools, 21 charter schools, and 53 middle, junior high, senior high, atypical schools and other program sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Mourns Passing of Judge Pamela Ann Rymer
    N E W S R E L E A S E September 22, 2011 Contact: David Madden (415) 355-8800 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Mourns Passing of Judge Pamela Ann Rymer SAN FRANCISCO – The Hon. Pamela Ann Rymer, a distinguished judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, died Wednesday, September 21, 2011, after a long illness. She was 69. Judge Rymer was diagnosed with cancer in 2009 and had been in failing health in recent months. She passed with friends at her bedside. “Judge Rymer maintained her calendar throughout her illness,” observed Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski. “Her passion for the law and dedication to the work of the court was inspiring. She will be sorely missed by all of her colleagues.” Judge Rymer served on the federal bench at both the appellate and trial levels for more than 28 years. Nominated by President Reagan, she was appointed a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on February 24, 1983. She was elevated to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by President George H.W. Bush, receiving her commission on May 22, 1989. During her 22 years on the appellate court, Judge Rymer sat on more than 800 merits panels and authored 335 panel opinions. She last heard oral arguments in July and her most recent opinion was filed in August. Her productivity was remarkable and every case received her full attention, colleagues said. "Each case was intrinsically important to her. Finding the right answer for the parties and doing the law correctly were foremost in her mind in every matter.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Report
    NINTH CIRCUIT United States Courts 2006 Annual Report 2006 Annual Report Cover.indd 3 08/20/2007 8:55:02 AM Above: Text mural of Article III of the United States Constitution located at the Wayne Lyman Morse Courthouse in Eugene, Oregon. Cover Image: San Francisco courtroom mosaic depicting Justice with Science, Literature and the Arts The Offi ce of the Circuit Executive would like to acknowledge the following for their contributions to the 2006 Annual Report: Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder Clerk of Court Cathy Catterson Chief Pretrial Services Offi cer George Walker Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Clerk Harold Marenus 2006 Annual Report Cover.indd 4 08/20/2007 8:55:04 AM Table of Contents Ninth Circuit Overview 2 Judicial Council Mission Statement 3 Foreword by Chief Judge Mary M. Schroeder 5 Ninth Circuit Overview 6 Judicial Council and Administration 8 Organization of Judicial Council Committees Judicial Transitions 10 New Judges 13 New Senior Judges 14 In Memoriam Ninth Circuit Highlights 16 Judicial Council Committees 19 2006 Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference 21 Conference Award Presentations 23 Devitt Award Presentation 25 Documentary Film Inspires Law Day Program 26 Ideas Set Forth for Managing Immigration Caseload 28 2006 National Gang Symposium Space and Facilities 30 Eugene Courthouse Dedicated 30 Space and Security Committee 33 Courthouses in Design Phase The Work of the Courts 36 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 39 District Courts 43 Bankruptcy Courts 45 Bankruptcy Appellate Panel 47 Magistrate Judge Matters 49 Federal Public Defenders 51 Probation Offi ces 53 Pretrial Services Offi ces 55 District by District Caseloads (All statistics provided by the Administrative Offi ce of the United States Courts) 2006 Annual Report Final.indd Sec1:1 08/20/2007 8:49:04 AM The Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit Annual Report 2006 Seated, from left: Chief District Judge Donald W.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 3:17-Cv-00597-GPC-AGS Case 3:17-Cv-00597-GPC-AGS Document 126 Filed 03/20/20 Pageid.1853 Page 2 of 5
    Case 3:17-cv-00597-GPC-AGS Document 126 Filed 03/20/20 PageID.1852 Page 1 of 5 1 BARON & BUDD, P.C. John P. Fiske (SBN 249256) 2 Jason Julius (SBN 249036) 11440 West Bernardo Court Suite 265, 3 San Diego, CA 92127 Telephone: 858-251-7424 Fax: 214-520-1181 4 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 5 Scott Summy (Pro Hac Vice Texas Bar No. 19507500) 6 Celeste Evangelisti (SBN 225232) Brett Land (Pro Hac Vice Texas Bar No. 24092664) 7 Zachary Sandman (Pro Hac Vice New York Bar No. 5418926) 3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 1100 8 Dallas, Texas 75219 Telephone: 214- 521-3605 Fax: 214-520-1181 9 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 10 Email: [email protected] 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 ADAM COX, individually, by and through Case No.: 3:17-cv-00597-GPC-AGS his durable power of attorney, VICTOR 15 COX, and on behalf of himself and others NOTICE OF UNOPPOSED MOTION similarly situated; MARIA OVERTON, FOR ORDER (1) GRANTING 16 individually, and on behalf of herself and PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF others similarly situated; JORDAN CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, (2) 17 YATES, individually, and on behalf of CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT himself and others similarly situated; CLASS, (3) APPOINTING CLASS 18 REPRESENTATIVES AND CLASS Plaintiffs, COUNSEL, (4) APPROVING NOTICE 19 v. PLAN, AND (5) SETTING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING 20 AMETEK, INC., a Delaware corporation; THOMAS DEENEY, individually; NO ORAL ARGUMENT UNLESS 21 SENIOR OPERATIONS LLC, a limited ORDERED BY THE COURT liability company; and DOES 1 through 22 100, inclusive, Hearing: June 8, 2020 at 11:15 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Clerkship Handbook 2013
    Career Services Office | CLERKSHIPS JUDICIAL CLERKSHIP HANDBOOK 2013 - 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview of the Clerkship Program 2 Should I Seek a Clerkship? 3 Where Should I Apply to Clerk? 4 Type of Court 5 State Courts 5 Federal Courts 6 Federal District Court 7 Federal Appellate Court 7 Clerkships with Specialized Courts 8 Bankruptcy Courts 8 U.S. Magistrate Judges 8 U.S. Claims Court 9 U.S. Tax Court 9 Federal Circuit 9 U.S. Court of International Trade 9 U.S. Supreme Court 10 How Do I Apply for Clerkships? 11 Clerkship Application Materials 12 Cover Letter and Resume 13 Transcripts 14 Writing Sample 15 Letters of Recommendation 16 Envelopes and Labels 17 Step-by-Step Instructions 18 Clerkship Interviews, Offers and Acceptances 22 APPENDICES Appendix A: Timeline and Checklist Appendix B: USC Law School Graduates & Students with Clerkships Appendix C: USC Faculty Who Clerked Appendix D: California State Court Hiring Practices Appendix E: Optional Recommender Questionnaire Appendix F: Resources for Researching Judges and Courts Appendix G: Loan Repayment Assistance Program Appendix H: Supplemental Readings Appendix I: Sample Cover Letters Appendix J: Form of Address Appendix K: Mail-Merge Instructions Table of Contents OVERVIEW OF THE CLERKSHIP PROGRAM A judicial clerkship can be a very rewarding work experience for a recent law graduate, and it is a great way to begin your legal career in almost any area of practice. The Law School and the Clerkship Committee strongly support our students’ efforts to apply for judicial clerkships through several means, including the following: ASSIGNING YOU A CLERKSHIP ADVISOR If you participate in the Clerkship Program, we will assign a member of the Clerkship Committee or the Career Services Office to be your advisor throughout the application process.
    [Show full text]
  • CHICAGO, ILLINOIS SUNDAY, JULY 21, 1991 LOCATION CHICAGO, IL Cabaret Metro SET 1 1
    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS SUNDAY, JULY 21, 1991 LOCATION CHICAGO, IL Cabaret Metro SET 1 1. Wash 2. Once 3. Even Flow 4. State Of Love And Trust 5. Alive 6. Why Go CHICAGO, ILLINOIS FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 1991 LOCATION CHICAGO, IL Aragon Ballroom SET 1 1. Release 2. Even Flow 3. Smells Like Teen Spirit 4. Once 5. Alive 6. Jeremy 7. Why Go 8. Porch CHICAGO, ILLINOIS SATURDAY, MARCH 28, 1992 LOCATION CHICAGO, IL Cabaret Metro SET 1 1. Release 2. Even Flow 3. Improv (You Tell Me) 4. Rockin' In The Free World 5. Once 6. State Of Love And Trust 7. Alive 8. Black 9. Deep 10. Jeremy 11. Why Go 12. Porch TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 02, 1992 LOCATION TINLEY PARK, IL World Music Amphitheater SET 1 1. Summertime Rolls 2. Why Go 3. Deep 4. Jeremy 5. Even Flow 6. Alive 7. Black 8. Once 9. Porch CHICAGO, ILLINOIS THURSDAY, MARCH 10, 1994 LOCATION CHICAGO, IL Chicago Stadium SET 1 1. Release 2. Animal 3. Go 4. Even Flow 5. Dissident 6. Empire Carpet song 7. State Of Love And Trust 8. Why Go 9. Jeremy 10. Glorified G 11. Daughter 12. The Real Me 13. Not For You 14. Rearviewmirror 15. Blood 16. Alive 17. Porch 18. Garden 19. Happy Birthday (Jeff) 20. Spin The Black Circle 21. Black 22. Tremor Christ 23. Footsteps 24. Rockin' In The Free World 25. I Won't Back Down 26. Leash 27. Sonic Reducer Indifference CHICAGO, ILLINOIS SUNDAY, MARCH 13, 1994 LOCATION CHICAGO, IL New Regal Theater SET 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The
    Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 171 1 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 KEVIN PINE, individually and on behalf Case No. 17-cv-1826 11 of all others similarly situated, DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. 12 Plaintiff, HUTCHINSON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO THE 14 A PLACE FOR MOM, INC., a Delaware PLAINTIFFS corporation, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DECLARATION OF DANIEL M. HUTCHINSON LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Case No. 17-cv-1826 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 1836300.2 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel. 415.956.1000 • Fax 415.956.1008 Case 2:17-cv-01826-TSZ Document 153 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 171 1 I, Daniel M. Hutchinson, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner in of the law firm of Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 3 (“LCHB”), co-counsel of record for Plaintiff in this matter. 4 2. I am admitted to practice pro hac vice before this Court and am a member in good 5 standing of the bar of the State of California; the United States District Court for the Central, 6 Northern, and Southern Districts of California; the United States District Court for the Eastern 7 District of Wisconsin; and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and 8 Eleventh Circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Pearl Jam Raises Pepsi Center Roof
    Political Pearl Jam raises Pepsi Center roof The Gazette (Colorado Springs, CO) April 3, 2003 | ROBIN A. ROTHMAN; THE GAZETTE It was 11 p.m. when the house lights came up Tuesday at the Pepsi Center, but the guys in Pearl Jam weren't ready to vacate the stage. They weren't concerned that they were 15 minutes past curfew. After all, it was the start of their 2003 U.S. tour and they had barely begun the third song of their second encore. The crowd was equally determined to "Keep on Rockin' in the Free World" for at least a few more minutes. The song, both in performance and in sentiment - "Take to the streets! Raise your voice!" - was a powerful ending to a night of varied content and mixed response. Amply sprinkled with tunes from their latest release, "Riot Act," the set list adequately represented the group's catalog, but the selection was clearly geared toward those fans dedicated enough to own albums after the debut "Ten" and follow-up "Vs." "Love Boat Captain," a touching tribute to the nine fans trampled when the band played in Denmark in 2000, opened the show slow and steady at 8:45 p.m. with the borrowed idea that "All you need is love." "Corduroy" and "Better Man" were obvious crowd-pleasers, and unsurprisingly those rare, older, bigger hits like "Even Flow," "Porch" and "Daughter" prompted sing-alongs. "I see you're into the song," frontman Eddie Vedder improvised during "Black," tying it in as if it were a standard lyric.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Agreement Is Entered Into by Plaintiffs on Behalf of Themselves and 3 the Class Members, and Defendant Reckitt Benckiser, LLC
    Case 3:17-cv-03529-VC Document 221-2 Filed 05/12/21 Page 2 of 141 1 BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP TIMOTHY G. BLOOD (149343) 2 THOMAS J. O’REARDON II (247952) 501 West Broadway, Suite 1490 3 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619/338-1100 4 619/338-1101 (fax) [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Class Counsel 7 [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 GORDON NOBORU YAMAGATA and Case No. 3:17-cv-03529-VC STAMATIS F. PELARDIS, individually and 11 on behalf of all others similarly situated, STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT 12 Plaintiffs, LLP CLASS ACTION , 13 v. 14 RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, District Judge Vince Chhabria EARDON Courtroom 4, 17th Floor 15 Defendant. O’ R Complaint Filed: June 19, 2017 & 16 Trial Date: N/A URST 17 H 18 LOOD LOOD B 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:17-cv-03529-VC 00177902 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 3:17-cv-03529-VC Document 221-2 Filed 05/12/21 Page 3 of 141 1 TABLE OF EXHIBITS 2 Document Exhibit Number 3 Preliminary Approval Order ................................................................................................. 1 4 Final Approval Order ............................................................................................................ 2 5 Final Judgment ..................................................................................................................... 3 6 Class Notice Program ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Agreement (ICE)
    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PLAINTIFF COMMITTEE FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS OF SONOMA COUNTY AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; ICE SPECIAL AGENTS CHRISTOPHER MERENDINO AND MARIO HUELGA IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES CV -08-4220 (RS) This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between remaining Plaintiff, Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County (referred to hereinafter as "PlaintiffCIRSC"), and remaining Federal Defendants, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), and ICE Special Agents Christopher Merendino and Mario Huelga in their official.capacities, (collectively referred to hereinafter as "Defendants."). The effective date of this Agreement is December 5, 2011 (the "Effective Date"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Francisco Sanchez-Lopez ("Sanchez-Lopez"); Christyan Sonato- Vega, ("Sonato-Vega"); and Plaintiff CIRSC filed a Complaint against Defendants United States of America ("USA"); U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"); Special Agent Mario Huelga ("Huelga"), in his official and individual capacities; Special Agent Chris Merendino ("Merendino"), in his official and personal capacities; ROES 1-50; County of Sonoma, Sheriff-Coroner Bill Cogbill ("Cogbill"), in his official ~md individual capacities; Deputy Sheriff Morris Eric Salkin ("Salkin"), in his official and individual capacities; and DOES 1-50, (collectively referred to hereinafter as "County Defendants") on September
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    Case 3:15-cv-02159-VC Document 186 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 42 1 Derek W. Loeser, admitted pro hac vice Gretchen Freeman Cappio, admitted pro hac vice 2 KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P. 3 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98101-3052 4 (206) 623-1900; Fax: (206) 623-3384 [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Jeffrey Lewis (Bar No. 66587) 7 KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P. 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 8 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 463-3900; Fax: (510) 463-3901 9 [email protected] 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 SHAHRIAR JABBARI and KAYLEE 14 HEFFELFINGER, on behalf of themselves and all No. 15-cv-02159-VC 15 others similarly situated, 16 Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF DEREK W. LOESER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 17 v. FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, 18 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and WELLS CERTIFICATION OF A SETTLEMENT FARGO BANK, N.A., CLASS, SERVICE AWARDS, AND 19 FEE/COST AWARD Defendants. 20 Date: March 22, 2018 21 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 4, 17th Floor 22 Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 15-cv-02159-VC DECLARATION OF DEREK W. LOESER IN SUPPORT OF FINAL APPROVAL, SERVICE AWARDS, AND FEES AND COSTS Case 3:15-cv-02159-VC Document 186 Filed 01/19/18 Page 2 of 42 1 I, Derek W. Loeser, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner at the law firm of Keller Rohrback L.L.P.
    [Show full text]