Ben Avery FITA Archery Range Use Safety: 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Arizona State Archery Association - Ben Avery FITA Archery Range Use Safety: 1. All range users are personally responsible for range safety and safe shooting. 2. All shooters are responsible for immediately correcting any unsafe conditions. 3. If you observe any unsafe conditions, report them immediately to the main range. Ben Avery Shooting Facility: Main range phone number: 623-582-5039. 4. Shooting is permitted when all persons are on or behind the shooting line and a safe shooting condition exists. 5. During special events, the range is under the control of the Director of Shooting (Range Master). Obey the instructions of the officials. 6. All shooting is to be into archery targets, mats, bales and safe backstops only. Procedures: 1. Handle equipment in a safe manner with arrows always pointing towards the targets. 2. Keep arrows in the quivers until you are given the signal to shoot. 3. Secure loose clothing. Remove loose items jewelry, strings, cords etc. 4. Respect others and their equipment. 5. Pets must be kept on a controlled leash at all times. 6. Deposit trash in waste containers. 7. Special event requests and reservation for the FITA Range require submittal to, and approval by, the BASF main office. 8. Vehicles shall park only in the established parking lot. 9. Overnight parking or camping must be arranged in advance with the main office. 10. Conduct only lawful activities. 11. Be cautious of poisonous animals (snakes, scorpions, spiders, etc.) Equipment: 1. Target archery (bows and arrows) equipment only. 2. Field tips and target archery arrow tip type only. 3. Maximum compound bow poundage, 60#. Prohibited: 1. Use of firearms is prohibited on ALL archery ranges. 2. Smoking is prohibited on the range, in the archer’s area, in the spectator’s area, in the official area and in the canopy area. Deposit tobacco products in appropriate receptacles. 3. Alcohol is prohibited on ALL ranges. 4. Persons who have been consuming alcohol or who are under the influence of drugs are prohibited from shooting. 5. No running with or near equipment and arrows is allowed on the range. 6. Use of targets not specially intended for archery (cans, cactus, bottles, etc.) is prohibited. 7. No climbing. 8. No driving or parking on unimproved desert areas, driveways or in the archers areas. 9. No broad head arrows. 10. Inappropriate language is prohibited. In case of emergency call “911”. Enjoy the Ben Avery Shooting Facility. Arizona State Archery Association Page 1 of 1 602‐228‐0465 8681 East Via De Negocio Fax 480‐991‐2623 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 [email protected] .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

2021 Catalog
2021 NEW PRODUCTS G-Power Flip and Punch Spin Bait Designed by Aaron Martens, Walleye anglers across the Midwest have become Gamakatsu has developed the dependent upon the spin style hooks for walleye rigs. new G-Power Heavy Cover Flip The Spin Bait hook can be rigged behind spinner & Punch Hook. A step up from blades, prop blades or used the G-Finesse Heavy Cover alone with just a simple Hook, for serious flipping and bead in front of them. It’s punching with heavy fluorocarbon and braid. The TGW (Tournament unique design incorporates Grade Wire) hook, paired with its welded eye, make this the strongest Gamakatsu swivels that is Heavy Cover hook in Gamakatsu’s G-Series lineup. Ideal for larger baits independent of the hook, giving the hook more freedom to spin while and weights, punching through grass mats and flipping into heavy reducing line twist. The Spin Bait hook features Nano Smooth Coat for timber. G-Power Flip and Punch ideally matches to all types of cover stealth presentations and unsurpassed hook penetration and the bait and able to withstand extreme conditions. Page 26 keeper barbs on the shank hold live and plastic baits on more securely. Page 48 G-Power Stinger Trailer Hook The new G-Power Stinger Trailer Hook Superline Offset Round Bend brilliance comes from Gamakatsu’s famous Gamakatsu’s Superline Offset Round B10S series of fly hooks and the expertise Bend is designed with a heavier of Professional Bass angler Aaron Martens. Superline wire best suited for heavy The Stinger Trailer has a strategically braided and fluorocarbon lines.
[Show full text]
The Ukrainian Weekly 1981, No.45
www.ukrweekly.com ;?C свОБОДАJLSVOBODA І І і о "в УКРДШСШИИ щоліннмк ^Щ^У UKKAINIAHOAIIV PUBLISHEDrainia BY THE UKRAINIAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATIOnN INC . A FRATERNAWeekL NON-PROFIT ASSOCIATION l ї Ш Ute 25 cents voi LXXXVIII No. 45 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 8, i98i Reagan administration Five years later announces appointment for rights post The Ukrainian Helsinki Group: WASHINGTON - After months of the struggle continues delay, the Reagan administration an– nounced on October 30 that it is no– When the leaders of 35 states gathered in Helsinki in minating Elliot Abrams, a neo-conser– August 1975 signed the Final Act of the Conference on vative Democrat and former Senate Security and Cooperation in Europe, few could aide, to be assistant secretary of state for have foreseen the impact the agreement would have in human rights and humanitarian affairs, the Soviet Union. While the accords granted the Soviets reported The New York Times. de jure recognition of post-World War ll boundaries, they The 33-year-old lawyer, who pre– also extracted some acquiescence to provisions viously worked as special counsel to guaranteeing human rights and freedom, guarantees Sen. Henry Jackson of Washington and that already existed in the Soviet Constitution and Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New countless international covenants. York, joined the administration last At the time, the human-rights provisions seemed January as assistant secretary of state unenforceable, a mere formality, a peripheral issue for international organization affairs. agreed to by a regime with no intention of carrying in announcing the nomination, Presi– them through. dent Ronald Reagan stated that hu– But just over one year later, on November 9,1976,10 man-rights considerations are an im– courageous Ukrainian intellectuals in Kiev moat of portant part of foreign policy, the Times them former political prisoners, formed the Ukrainian said.
[Show full text]
SCRS/2020/056 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(4): 240-251 (2020)
SCRS/2020/056 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 77(4): 240-251 (2020) 1 REVIEW ON THE EFFECT OF HOOK TYPE ON THE CATCHABILITY, HOOKING LOCATION, AND POST-CAPTURE MORTALITY OF THE SHORTFIN MAKO, ISURUS OXYRINCHUS B. Keller1*, Y. Swimmer2, C. Brown3 SUMMARY Due to the assessed vulnerability for the North Atlantic shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus, ICCAT has identified the need to better understand the use of circle hooks as a potential mitigation measure in longline fisheries. We conducted a literature review related to the effect of hook type on the catchability, anatomical hooking location, and post-capture mortality of this species. We found twenty eight papers related to these topics, yet many were limited in interpretation due to small sample sizes and lack of statistical analysis. In regards to catchability, our results were inconclusive, suggesting no clear trend in catch rates by hook type. The use of circle hooks was shown to either decrease or have no effect on at-haulback mortality. Three papers documented post-release mortality, ranging from 23-31%. The use of circle hooks significantly increased the likelihood of mouth hooking, which is associated with lower rates of post-release mortality. Overall, our review suggests minimal differences in catchability of shortfin mako between hook types, but suggests that use of circle hooks likely results in higher post-release survival that may assist population recovery efforts. RÉSUMÉ En raison de la vulnérabilité évaluée en ce qui concerne le requin-taupe bleu de l'Atlantique Nord (Isurus oxyrinchus), l’ICCAT a identifié le besoin de mieux comprendre l'utilisation des hameçons circulaires comme mesure d'atténuation potentielle dans les pêcheries palangrières.
[Show full text]
Learning Cyrillic
LEARNING CYRILLIC Question: If there is no equivalent letter in the Cyrillic alphabet for the Roman "J" or "H" how do you transcribe good German names like Johannes, Heinrich, Wilhelm, etc. I heard one suggestion that Johann was written as Ivan and that the "h" was replaced with a "g". Can you give me a little insight into what you have found? In researching would I be looking for the name Ivan rather than Johann? One must always think phonetic, that is, think how a name is pronounced in German, and how does the Russian Cyrillic script produce that sound? JOHANNES. The Cyrillic spelling begins with the letter “I – eye”, but pronounced “eee”, so we have phonetically “eee-o-hann” which sounds like “Yo-hann”. You can see it better in typeface – Иоганн , which letter for letter reads as “I-o-h-a-n-n”. The modern Typeface script is radically different than the old hand-written Cyrillic script. Use the guide which I sent to you. Ivan is the Russian equivalent of Johann, and it pops up occasionally in Church records. JOSEPH / JOSEF. Listen to the way the name is pronounced in German – “yo-sef”, also “yo-sif”. That “yo” sound is produced by the Cyrillic script letters “I” and “o”. Again you can see it in the typeface. Иосеф and also Иосиф. And sometimes Joseph appears as , transliterated as O-s-i-p. Similar to all languages and scripts, Cyrillic spellings are not consistent. The “a” ending indicates a male name. JAKOB. There is no “Jay” sound in the German language.
[Show full text]
5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) P. Faltstrom, Ed. Request for Comments: 5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721 The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) Abstract This document specifies rules for deciding whether a code point, considered in isolation or in context, is a candidate for inclusion in an Internationalized Domain Name (IDN). It is part of the specification of Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications 2008 (IDNA2008). Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5892. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
[Show full text]
Stream Restoration Series J-Hook Vane Authors: E.L
Fact Sheet Number 3 Stream Restoration Series J-Hook Vane Authors: E.L. Hickman and T.M. Thompson, Biological Systems Engineering J-hook vanes are flow deflection In modified j-hook vanes, the hook structures that dissipate energy, deflect extends across the entire baseflow stream flow to the center of the channel, channel, such that it resembles a cross reduce streambank erosion, and create vane without one vane arm. The ALTERNATE NAMES: pools. The original j-hook vane differs modified j-hook structure provides grade from the similar single-arm vane in control in two ways. First, the footer j-vane that it extends beyond the vane tip at rocks extend below the expected scour approximately right angles to downstream depth to prevent upstream migration of STRUCTURE TYPE: flow. This extension is the “hook” which knickpoints. A knickpoint is point along gives this vane type its characteristic “J” the channel where there is a sharp change rigid structure; flow deflector; shape. Particularly in smaller streams, in the stream bed elevation, which creates river training structure the j-hook structure can be modified a small waterfall that can erode upstream. to span the channel to provide grade Second, the vane creates an elevation control (Figure 1). J-hook vanes may change in the channel longitudinal be constructed of wood (logs), stone profile, which allows lower bed slopes (boulders), or a combination of both upstream and downstream of the vane, materials. decreasing the forces driving channel erosion. Where applicable, the j-hook vane is a more ecologically beneficial alternative to traditional bank armor, such as riprap.
[Show full text]
Reading Russian Documents: the Alphabet
Reading Russian Documents: The Alphabet Russian “How to” Guide, Beginner Level: Instruction October 2019 GOAL This guide will help you to: • understand a basic history of the Cyrillic alphabet. • recognize and identify Russian letters – both typed and handwritten. • learn the English transcription and pronunciation for letters of the Cyrillic alphabet. INTRODUCTION The Russian language uses the Cyrillic alphabet which has roots in the mid-ninth century. At this time, a new Slavic Empire known as Moravia was forming in the east. In 862, Prince Rastislav of Moravia requested that missionaries from the Byzantine Empire be sent to teach his people. Shortly thereafter, two brothers, known as Constantine and Methodius, arrived from what is now modern-day Macedonia. Realizing that a written alphabet could aid in spreading the gospel message, Constantine created a written alphabet to translate the Gospels and other religious texts. As a result of his work, the Orthodox Church later canonized Constantine as St. Cyril, Apostle to the Slavs. The Russian Empire adopted St. Cyril’s alphabet in 988 and used it for centuries until some changes were made in the seventeenth century. In 1672, Tsar Peter the Great came into power and immediately began carrying out several reforms, including an alphabet reform. Peter wanted the Cyrillic characters to appear less Greek and more westernized. As a result, several Greek letters were eliminated and other letters that looked “too” Greek were replaced with Latin visual equivalents. Additionally, Peter the Great replaced the Cyrillic numbering system for the usage of Arabic numerals. The next major change to the alphabet came in 1918, following the Russian Revolution.
[Show full text]
Cyrillic # Version Number
############################################################### # # TLD: xn--j1aef # Script: Cyrillic # Version Number: 1.0 # Effective Date: July 1st, 2011 # Registry: Verisign, Inc. # Address: 12061 Bluemont Way, Reston VA 20190, USA # Telephone: +1 (703) 925-6999 # Email: [email protected] # URL: http://www.verisigninc.com # ############################################################### ############################################################### # # Codepoints allowed from the Cyrillic script. # ############################################################### U+0430 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A U+0431 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER BE U+0432 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER VE U+0433 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER GE U+0434 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER DE U+0435 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER IE U+0436 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ZHE U+0437 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ZE U+0438 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER II U+0439 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHORT II U+043A # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER KA U+043B # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EL U+043C # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EM U+043D # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EN U+043E # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER O U+043F # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER PE U+0440 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ER U+0441 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ES U+0442 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER TE U+0443 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER U U+0444 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EF U+0445 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER KHA U+0446 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER TSE U+0447 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER CHE U+0448 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHA U+0449 # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHCHA U+044A # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER HARD SIGN U+044B # CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER YERI U+044C # CYRILLIC
[Show full text]
AB Descender
EU Declaration of Conformity No. SAR/D001 Specialist Access & Rescue Products Ltd. This declaration of conformity is issued by Specialist Access & Rescue Products Ltd. Of Sarena House, Vulcan Street, Oldham, OL1 4LQ We herby declare that: Equipment: A-B Descender Models: RA002 is in conformity with PPE EU Regulations 2016/425, as well as the applicable requirements of the following standards (where applicable) Ref No. EN341-B:1993 EN12841-C:2006 Notified body: SGS FIMKO OY, Takomotie 8, FI-00380 Helsinki, Finland. Notified Body No: 0598 Performed the EU type examination and issued the EC type examination certificate number: GB06/68096 The PPE is subject to the conformity assessment procedure. Conformity to type based on quality assurance of the production process module D. Under the surveillance of the above Notified Body. Signed by: Name: Lee Allport Position: Operations Director Done At: SAR Products - Sarena House, Vulcan Street, Oldham, OL1 4LQ On: 17/10/18 Specialist Access & Rescue Products Ltd. Sarena House, Vulcan Street, Oldham, OL1 4LQ T: +44(0) 161 621 0309 E: [email protected] W: www.sar-products.com EN IMPORTANT: 0598 In order to ensure optimum safety and performance, please study and understand these instructions before using the product. The A-B DESCENDER is a DESCENDER designed specifically for Technical Rope Access and Intervention purposes by Police and Special Forces, who require a multi-use rope adjustment device that allows taking the load of two people for the purposes of rescue and with a Panic Grab Brake (PGB). In Technical Access it must always be used in conjunction with an EN12841 Type A device or EN353-2 back- up device’s this is not always required in Intervention or Rescue.
[Show full text]
EN 341 Does NOT Contain the Full Details of the DESCENDERS | PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT Standard
This summary of EN 341 does NOT contain the full details of the DESCENDERS | PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT standard. It is a simplified summary to provide an overview of the test me- EN 341 thods and safety requirements for the product. The official version of the standard must be consulted if full infor- mation is required. Details of the standard are provided at the end of this summary. Descender: automatic (type 1) or manually-operated (type 2) DYNAMIC ELONGATION TEST (DROP TEST) device, including a line, by which people can, at a limited speed, Descender devices operated from a fixed position that do not rescue themselves or others from a higher to a lower position so travel with the user during the descent. that a free fall is prevented. Some 4000 mm of the line is Automatic descender device (type 1): descender device with a withdrawn from the descender braking system that does not require intervention by the user once device. the descent has commenced. The test mass is applied, in ac- cordance with the maximum Manually-operated descender device (type 2): Descender rated load, and raised by 600 device with a braking system that requires intervention by the user. mm. The test mass is released without initial speed. Control device: integral element of the descender device normally 4000 mm The descender device is che- operated by hand, used to control the speed of descent down the cked to ensure that it does not line. release the test mass and shows 600 mm no signs of breaking or tearing. Panic locking element: integral part or function of the control device which stops or slows down the descent and therefore pre- vents an uncontrolled descent or a fall if the user operates the descender device beyond its intended control parameters.
[Show full text]
EL DORADO BLUES the Trip WE Dream ABOUT
FREE! SPRING 2012 Tune in to Let’s Talk Hook-Up every Saturday and Sunday 7am to 9am on XX Sports Radio 1090 AM THE TRIP WE DREAM ABOUT By “Rock Cod” Rick Maxa departs the day after Thanksgiving. This a variety of ways, including several very is a very busy day for the long-range fleet, in-depth seminars lead by 2nd Captain (and I feel like however the red shirt crew at Fisherman’s co-owner of the boat) Brian Simms. Semi- I need Cap- made the loading a breeze, and by 8:30am, nars are broken up into different subjects, tain Tim Ek- we were clearing the point (Point Loma) and held on different days and included strom’s the- and headed south for destinations unknown. everything one would want to know about saurus to ap- There was a lot of speculation as to where long-range fishing. We covered techniques propriately we would fish on our trip. The boats before on hooking and landing big fish, rigging, describe this us all had great fishing at different loca- wahoo fishing, fish processing, safety fea- year’s Let’s tions. tures of the boat, common mistakes as well Talk Hook-Up With 12 days, everything was within as what to expect on this trip. We also held 12-day trip our reach: Hurricane bank, Clarion Island great raffles including rods, reels, a Sato on the Royal “ buffer zone”, and the Banks outside Mag crimp kit, jigs, and much more, all donated Star! Epic, Bay, known as “the beach” all had big fish by Let’s Talk Hook-Up sponsors! Our crew fantastic, sensational, no one narrative on them.
[Show full text]
A Study of Pre-Equating Based on Item Response Theory Isaaci
A Study of Pre-Equating Based on Item Response Theory IsaacI. Bejar and Marilyn S. Wingersky Educational Testing Service The study reports a feasibility study using item subscore, and total score level. Minor problems response theory (IRT) as a means of equating the were found at each of these levels; but, on the Test of Standard Written English (TSWE). The whole, the three-parameter model was found to por- study focused on the possibility of pre-equating, tray the data well. The adequacy of the equating that is, deriving the equating transformation prior provided by IRT procedures was investigated in two to the final administration of the test. The three-pa- TSWE forms. It was concluded that pre-equating rameter logistic model was postulated as the re- does not appear to present problems beyond those sponse model and its fit was assessed at the item, inherent to IRT-equating. Equating, in general, refers to the derivation of transformations that map scores on different forms of a test onto a scale in such a way that after transformation the scores on the various forms are comparable. The equating methodology that has been commonly used (see Angoff, 1971) requires that the form being equated first be administered to testees. Since, in large-scale testing programs, scores are not due back to testees for 4 to 6 weeks, it would seem that there is ample time to derive the equating transformation. In practice, the bulk of the time is consumed by various data-processing steps. As a result, the equating transformation must be produced in a rather short period of time.
[Show full text]