Foraging Strategies of Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax Carbo Carbo Wintering North of the Arctic Circle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foraging Strategies of Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax Carbo Carbo Wintering North of the Arctic Circle 481059_v2 23/3/01 7:08 am Page 59 Bird Study (2001) 48, 59–67 Foraging strategies of Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo carbo wintering north of the Arctic Circle ROGER JOHANSEN1,2,, ROBERT T. BARRETT1* and TORSTEIN PEDERSEN2 1Zoology Department, Tromsø University Museum, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway and 2Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway This study describes how 30 Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo carbo managed to catch sufficient food for their daily energetic needs under conditions of reduced daylight and cold while wintering north of the Arctic Circle. Activity observations showed that the Great Cormorants’ daily foraging pattern was generally bimodal, with morning and evening feeding peaks. They compensated for shorter daylengths in midwinter by starting to forage later and ending progressively earlier at lower light intensities. Fishing constituted only a minor part of their time–activity budget, and was one of the most efficient reported in marine birds. The Great Cormorants spent less than 60 minutes a day fishing in midwinter. Although subzero ambient temperatures and blizzards contributed to increased heat loss in midwinter, this potential energy loss did not seem to be compensated for by an increase in fish intake. Instead the Great Cormorants seemed to economize energy expenditure by halving the time spent at sea, and halving the number but doubling the mass of each fish taken. Thermoregulation in cold-climate animals that they are poorly insulated and their feathers depends mainly on body temperature, insula- become wet when diving (Rijke 1968, Siegfried tion, activity and lower critical temperature, as et al. 1975). Although feather wetting is associ- well as a combination of wind strength and ated with reduced swimming cost through ambient air and sea temperatures (Schmidt- reduced buoyancy, it also increases heat loss Nielsen 1990). In northern Norway, thousands considerably compared with other divers of visual feeding seabirds and sea ducks (Siegfried et al. 1975, Hustler 1991, Wilson et al. wintering in the fjords within the Arctic Circle 1992). This energy loss may be compensated for experience reduced daylengths, subzero ambi- by increased food intake and feeding activity ent temperatures, sea surface temperatures (Carss 1997), by increased prey capture rates around 0°C, blizzards, and sometimes ice- (Kruuk & Carss 1996) or by decreased activity covered foraging areas. These factors not only and metabolic rate, since body temperature and increase thermoregulatory demands directly, metabolic rate are activity-dependent (Birt- but also limit the time available to feed through Friesen et al. 1989, Wilson & Grémillet 1996). reductions in daylength. However, being visual predators, feather For the 5–10 000 Great Cormorants Phalacro- wetting is a further disadvantage in that it corax carbo carbo (equivalent to 15–30% of the limits the lengths of fishing bouts in what are population breeding north of the Arctic Circle) already short periods of daylight. which winter in the Arctic (N. Røv pers. To ensure sufficient energy intake, predators comm.), the situation is exacerbated by the facts can trade-off between taking numerous and abundant but small prey items, or taking few *Correspondence author. and larger but less abundant prey. This is Email: [email protected] not necessarily a simple question of prey © 2001 British Trust for Ornithology 481059_v2 23/3/01 7:08 am Page 60 60 R. Johansen, R.T. Barrett and T. Pedersen availability, but also one of cost–benefit consid- Sørfjord erations, time available for foraging and the risk of overnight starvation (Kruuk & Carss 1996). Feeding site selection has also been shown to be important for the foraging Arctic 25 success of cormorants, which catch fish on both circle vegetation-covered and naked sea beds, mostly 50 in shallow water of 0–10 m depth (Blackwell & Krohn 1997, Debout et al. 1995). Cormorants are 125 visual foragers feeding during daylight and twilight hours (Siegfried et al. 1975, pers. obs.) such that sufficient light and daylength are Main day roost essential for successful foraging. Daylength will also influence their activity pattern and diving-depths as reported in other seabirds (Cannell & Cullen 1998, Systad et al. 2000). The objectives of this study were to deter- Main night roost mine to what extent Arctic winter conditions determined the diurnal foraging pattern and ranges, time spent foraging and fishing yield 25 of the Great Cormorants. No detailed study of Great Cormorant foraging habits has previously been carried out so far north in mid- winter. This investigation was undertaken in Sørfjord, an enclosed fjord in northern 50 Norway (69°32′N, 19°40′E), where 29–31 Great Cormorants roosted and fed every day from 25 late September to early April during the winter 1996/97 (Fig. 1). Although the sun remains below the horizon for two months (late N November – late January) at this latitude, there are c. 4.5 hours of twilight in mid-December 1 km when the sun is no more than 6° below the Figure 1. Study area in Sørfjord, northern Norway. horizon (Anon. 1997). Depths are in meters. Shallow waters (0–25 m) are shaded grey. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study area Gadus morhua and Saithe Pollachius virens (Johansen et al. 1999). Sørfjord is an inner extension of a larger fjord, Ullsfjord with a 300-m wide and 8-m deep sill Data collection over which there is a strong tidal current. The fjord has steep bathymetric gradients and a Roosting Great Cormorants were counted at maximum depth of 133 m. The main area in their main night and day roosts, and on all sea which the Great Cormorants were active had a marks and skerries in the enclosed fjord. maximum depth of 65 m (Fig. 1). The Great Counts were made every 15 minutes from Cormorants in Sørfjord were suitable subjects dawn to dusk on three days in the middle for foraging behaviour studies due to their of each month from October 1996 to March numbers, known roost attendance and limited 1997 for a total of 165 hours. On 16 of the 18 foraging ranges. Their roost and feeding areas observation days, we also recorded which for- were within easy view from land along the aging sites they used and how far they ranged narrow fjord (Fig. 1) and their diet was from their night roost. relatively uniform and dominated by Cod Observation positions were c. 20–50 m from © 2001 British Trust for Ornithology, Bird Study, 48, 59–67 481059_v2 23/3/01 7:08 am Page 61 Great Cormorants foraging in arctic winter 61 Table 1. Measured and predicted environmental conditions in Sørfjord in the winter 1996/97, or at nearest meteor-/hydro- logical station in northern Norway. Condition Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Measured Ambient temperaturea (°C) +3.9 –0.9 –4.4 -– 3.9 –4.2 –2.9 Wind forcea (m/s) 2.5 4.2 3.4 5.4 3.0 2.0 Precipitationa (mm/month) 186 79 101 234 114 100 Light intensity at zenithb (lux) 90.1 597.2 11.8 93.9 763.8 7465.0 Daylengthc (hr:min/day) 12:01 08:33 04:30 06:16 09:20 14:33 Predicted Sea temperatured 0–10 m (°C) 7.0 5.8 4.4 3.1 1.5 1.2 1% light depthe (m) 49 34 (5) (15) 37 48 Results are averages. aDet Norske Meteorologiske Institutt (unpubl. data); bJohansen (unpubl. data Anon (1999)); cin- cluding twilight periods; dfrom 1995–97 (Normann unpubl. data); efrom 1990–92 (Hegseth et al. 1995, Hegseth pers. comm.). Periods with the most critical values are in bold type. the tide line and 10–30 m above sea level, calculate the daily individual time at sea (in min- mainly on the roads running along the west utes) = flying, loafing, diving and resting at sea and east side of Sørfjord. Mirador 15–-45 × 60 = (daily mean % Great Cormorants not on a mm telescopes on tripods, Noctron night vision roost × minutes from dawn to dusk)/100. For scope (model V) with 135-mm f1.8 lens and monthly comparisons of daily fish consumption Zenith marine 7 × 50 mm twilight binoculars rates, an index of total fish mass (g)/pellet exam- were used for observations. Concurrent light ined was used, assuming a more or less constant intensities were recorded using a Lambda I.C. but unknown pellet production rate (Johnstone quantum-meter (400–700 nm PAR) with a plane et al. 1990, Veldkamp 1995, Zijlstra & Van Eerden sensor (Table 1). Weather data were provided 1995). Statistical analyses were carried out using by the nearest meteorological station in Statistica version 5 (Anon. 1994). Tromsø, 30 km west of the study area (Det Norske Meteorologiske Institutt unpubl. data). RESULTS The tidal state was defined using local tide tables. Sea temperatures were estimated from Diurnal foraging pattern and ranges data collected at 0–10 m depth in the Sørfjord/ Ullsfjord ecosystem by the University of The Great Cormorants’ night roost was on or Tromsø and similarly, depths of the euphotic around a small lighthouse c. 800 m from land zone (as 1% of the surface light irridance) were (Fig. 1). In general, they foraged in two distinct estimated from data from adjacent fjords periods, once in the morning and once in the (Hegseth et al. 1995, Hegseth pers. comm.) early afternoon with the intervening period Diet was determined using otoliths of fish spent roosting (Fig. 2). In October, a maximum found in 135 regurgitated pellets of indigestible of 65% of all Great Cormorants foraged at any food remains. Remains of prey items were one time (Fig. 2a). As daylength and hence counted and identified and otolith length/fish available foraging time decreased from October mass relationships were taken from Breiby to December, feeding started progressively (1985), Härkönen (1986), Pedersen (1997) and later and ended earlier in the day (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Breeding Seabirds at Dassen Island, South Africa: Chances of Surviving Great White Pelican Predation
    Vol. 9: 125–131, 2010 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online January 11 doi: 10.3354/esr00243 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Breeding seabirds at Dassen Island, South Africa: chances of surviving great white pelican predation Martin M. Mwema1, 2,*, Marta de Ponte Machado1, 2, Peter G. Ryan1 1Percy Fitzpatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 2Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa Present address: Box 1019, 00100, GPO, Nairobi, Kenya ABSTRACT: Seabird predation by great white pelicans Pelecanus onocrotalus is an unusual phenom- enon that has become increasingly frequent in the Western Cape, South Africa. We report the scale of pelican predation and its impact on the breeding success of 5 seabird species monitored at Dassen Island in 2006. Pelican predation was observed on chicks of kelp gulls Larus dominicanus, crowned cormorants Phalacrocorax coronatus and Cape cormorants Phalacrocorax capensis. No predation on eggs was seen. Breeding success for 4 of the 5 species studied was low, with the white-breasted cor- morants Phalacrocorax lucidus having the highest breeding success (0.56 fledglings per nest). Cape and bank cormorants Phalacrocorax neglectus did not fledge any chicks, while crowned cormorants had a breeding success of 0.08 fledglings per nest. Kelp gulls had a hatching success of 46%, but only a few chicks fledged, giving a breeding success of 0.06 fledglings per nest. Pelican predation poses a threat to at least 3 of the 5 seabirds studied, all of which are endemic to southern Africa. Three spe- cies are globally Endangered or Near Threatened, and pelican predation places additional pressure on these species.
    [Show full text]
  • An Albino Cape Cormorant Phalacrocorax Capensis
    72 Cook et al.: Albino Cape Cormorant AN ALBINO CAPE CORMORANT PHALACROCORAX CAPENSIS Timothée R. COOK1, OLIVER J.D. JEWELL2,3, WILFRED CHIVELL2 & MarthÁN N. BESTER3 1Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST ⁄ NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa ([email protected]) 2Dyer Island Conservation Trust, 5 Geelbek Street, Kleinbaai 7720, South Africa 3Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0002 South Africa 0002 Received 28 November 2011, accepted 11 March 2012 Albinism has been recorded in many vertebrate taxa (Halls 2004). It of misidentifying the cause of the aberration, the use of the term is a genetic anomaly in which an autosomal recessive gene causes an “partial albinism” is incorrect, as albinism, by definition, cannot absence of the enzyme tyrosinase, resulting in a total lack of melanin be partial. An albino Cape Cormorant Phalacrocorax capensis was pigment in the skin, scales, hairs, feathers and eyes (van Grouw reported by Cooper (1985) in the collections of the South African 2006). The skin and eye colour of albinos is pink because the blood Museum of Cape Town. Examination of this 100-year-old specimen can be seen through the transparent, unpigmented tissues. In birds, it revealed that it might indeed have been an albino. However, in the is the most frequently reported colour aberration, although it is the absence of information about the eye colour of this bird when it was least frequent in occurrence. This is because it is commonly mistaken alive, this will remain difficult to confirm.
    [Show full text]
  • Table Mountain National Park
    BIRDS OF TABLE MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK The Cape Peninsula has many records of vagrant species blown by storms, ship assisted or victims of reverse migration Bolded [1] depicts vagrant species Rob # English (Roberts 7) English (Roberts 6) Table Mountain 1 Common Ostrich Ostrich 1 2 King Penguin King Penguin [1] 2.1 Gentoo Penguin (925) Gentoo Penguin [1] 3 African Penguin Jackass Penguin 1 4 Rockhopper Penguin Rockhopper Penguin [1] 5 Macaroni Penguin Macaroni Penguin [1] 6 Great Crested Grebe Great Crested Grebe 1 7 Blacknecked Grebe Blacknecked Grebe 1 8 Little Grebe Dabchick 1 9 Southern Royal Albatross Royal Albatross 1 9.1 Northern Royal Albatross 1 10 Wandering Albatross Wandering Albatross 1 11 Shy Albatross Shy Albatross 1 12 Blackbrowed Albatross Blackbrowed Albatross 1 13 Greyheaded Albatross Greyheaded Albatross 1 14 Atlantic Yellownosed Albatross Yellownosed Albatross 1 15 Sooty Albatross Darkmantled Sooty Albatross 1 16 Lightmantled Albatross Lightmantled Sooty Albatross 1 17 Southern Giant-Petrel Southern Giant Petrel 1 18 Northern Giant-Petrel Northern Giant Petrel 1 19 Antarctic Fulmar Antarctic Fulmar 1 21 Pintado Petrel Pintado Petrel 1 23 Greatwinged Petrel Greatwinged Petrel 1 24 Softplumaged Petrel Softplumaged Petrel 1 26 Atlantic Petrel Atlantic Petrel 1 27 Kerguelen Petrel Kerguelen Petrel 1 28 Blue Petrel Blue Petrel 1 29 Broadbilled Prion Broadbilled Prion 1 32 Whitechinned Petrel Whitechinned Petrel 1 34 Cory's Shearwater Cory's Shearwater 1 35 Great Shearwater Great Shearwater 1 36 Fleshfooted Shearwater Fleshfooted
    [Show full text]
  • The Endangered Bank Cormorant Phalacrocorax Neglectus: the Heat Is On
    The endangered bank cormorant Phalacrocorax neglectus: the heat is on Understanding the effect of climate change and associated environmental variable changes on the breeding biology and population dynamics of the bank cormorant in the Western Cape, South Africa Corlia Meyer MYRCOR004 ThesisUniversity presented for the Degree of of MasterCape of Science Town in Zoology, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Cape Town, South Africa April 2014 Supervisors: Prof. L.G. Underhill, Prof. P.G. Ryan, Dr R.B. Sherley and Dr T. Cook The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Plagiarism declaration I know the meaning of plagiarism and declare that all of the work in this thesis, saved for that which is properly acknowledged, is my own. Signature:________________________ Date:_____________________________ i ii For the birds iii iv Abstract The bank cormorant Phalacrocorax neglectus was listed as ‘Endangered’ in 2004, following a decrease of more than 60% in the total population from 1975–2011. It ranges from central Namibia to the Western Cape, South Africa, with most of the population occurring on offshore islands in Namibia. The main reason for this study was to determine if climate change could be identified as a factor which has influenced the decreasing numbers of bank cormorants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Abbott's Booby 652 Abyssinian Lovebird 584 Accipiter Bicolor
    A African jacana 720 Abbott's booby 652 African malachite sunbird 1008 Abyssinian lovebird 584 African pygmy falcon (Polihierax semitorquatus) 17- Accipiter bicolor (bicolored hawk) 260 20 Accipiter cooperii (Cooper's hawk) 48, 257-260, 352, African pygmy goose (Nettapus auritus) 608, 940, 656 1032 Accipiter gentilis (northern goshawk) 260, 653-656 African pygmy kingfisher (Ceyx picta) 336 Accipiter gundlachi (Gundlach's hawk) 656 African skimmer (Rynchops flavirostris) 128 Accipiter nisus (Eurasian sparrowhawk) 349-352 African white-backed vulture 528 Accipiter rufiventris (rufous-breasted sparrowhawk) African wood owl (Strix woodfordii) 444 352 Agapornis spp. (lovebirds) 581-584 Accipiter soloenis (Chinese goshawk) 656 Agelaius phoeniceus (red-winged blackbird) 777-780 Accipiter tachiro (African goshawk) 656 Agelaius thilius (yellow-winged blackbird) 780 Accipiter trivirgatus (crested goshawk) 260 Aix galericulata (mandarin duck) 605-608, 1032 Accipitridae (Falconiformes) Aix sponsa (wood duck) 1029-1032 Accipiter cooperii (Cooper's hawk) 257-260 Ajaia ajaja (roseate spoonbill) 468 Accipiter gentilis (northern goshawk) 653-656 Alauda arvensis (skylark) 853-856 Accipiter nisus (Eurasian sparrowhawk) 349-352 Alauda gulgula (Oriental skylark) 856 Aquila chrysaetos (golden eagle) 381-384 Alaudidae 853-856 Aquila verreauxii (Verreaux's eagle) 957-960 albatross Circaetus gallicus (short-toed snake eagle) 849- black-browed (Diomedea melanophris) 101-104 852 wandering (Diomedea exulans) 973-976 Circus cyaneus (northern harrier) 657-660 waved
    [Show full text]
  • Partitioning of Nesting Space Among Seabirds of the Benguela Upwelling Region
    PARTITIONING OF NESTING SPACE AMONG SEABIRDS OF THE BENGUELA UPWELLING REGION DAviD C. DuFFY & GRAEME D. LA CocK Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa, 7700. Received February /985 SUMMARY DuFFY, D. C. & LA CocK, G. D. 1985. Partitioning of nesting space among seabirds of the Benguela upwel­ ling region. Ostrich 56: 186-201. An examination of nesting habitats used by the four main species of seabirds nesting on southern African islands (Jackass Penguin Spheniscus demersus, Cape Cormorant Phalacrocorax capensis, Bank Cormorant P. neglectus and Cape Gannet Morus capensis) revealed relatively minor differences and extensive over­ laps between species, primarily in subcolony size, steepness of nesting substratum, and proximity to cliffs. A weak dominance hierarchy existed; gannets could displace penguins, and penguins could displace cor­ morants. This hierarchy appeared to have little effect on partitioning of nesting space. Species successfully defended occupied sites in most cases of interspecific conflict, suggesting that site tenure by one species could prevent nesting by another. The creation of additional nesting space on Namibian nesting platforms did not increase guano harvests, suggesting that nesting space had not previously limited the total nesting population of Cape Cormorants, the most abundant of the breeding species, in Namibia. While local shortages of nesting space may occur, populations of the four principal species of nesting seabirds in the Benguela upwelling region do not seem to have been limited by the availability of nesting space on islands. INTRODUCTION pean settlement, space for nesting was limited. Af­ ter settlement, human disturbance such as hunting The breeding seabirds of the Benguela upwel­ and guano extraction reduced nesting space, re­ ling region off Namibia and South Africa are be­ sulting in smaller populations of nesting seabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Seabirds: a Global Assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P
    1 Threats to seabirds: a global assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P. Dias1*, Rob Martin1, Elizabeth J. Pearmain1, Ian J. Burfield1, Cleo Small2, Richard A. 5 Phillips3, Oliver Yates4, Ben Lascelles1, Pablo Garcia Borboroglu5, John P. Croxall1 6 7 8 Affiliations: 9 1 - BirdLife International. The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK 10 2 - BirdLife International Marine Programme, RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, SG19 2DL 11 3 – British Antarctic Survey. Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, 12 Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 13 4 – Centre for the Environment, Fishery and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33, UK 14 5 - Global Penguin Society, University of Washington and CONICET Argentina. Puerto Madryn U9120, 15 Chubut, Argentina 16 * Corresponding author: Maria Dias, [email protected]. BirdLife International. The David 17 Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK. Phone: +44 (0)1223 747540 18 19 20 Acknowledgements 21 We are very grateful to Bartek Arendarczyk, Sophie Bennett, Ricky Hibble, Eleanor Miller and Amy 22 Palmer-Newton for assisting with the bibliographic review. We thank Rachael Alderman, Pep Arcos, 23 Jonathon Barrington, Igor Debski, Peter Hodum, Gustavo Jimenez, Jeff Mangel, Ken Morgan, Paul Sagar, 24 Peter Ryan, and other members of the ACAP PaCSWG, and the members of IUCN SSC Penguin Specialist 25 Group (Alejandro Simeone, Andre Chiaradia, Barbara Wienecke, Charles-André Bost, Lauren Waller, Phil 26 Trathan, Philip Seddon, Susie Ellis, Tom Schneider and Dee Boersma) for reviewing threats to selected 27 species. We thank also Andy Symes, Rocio Moreno, Stuart Butchart, Paul Donald, Rory Crawford, 28 Tammy Davies, Ana Carneiro and Tris Allinson for fruitful discussions and helpful comments on earlier 29 versions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern African Costal Seabirds CAMP 2002.Pdf
    CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOUTHERN AFRICAN COASTAL SEABIRDS Edited by M. du Toit, G.C. Boere, J. Cooper, M.S. de Villiers, J. Kemper, B. Lenten, S.L. Petersen, R.E. Simmons, L.G. Underhill, P.A. Whittington & O.P. Byers Authored by the Workshop participants Workshop Report Cape Town, South Africa 4 – 8 February 2002 Avian Demography Unit, University of Cape Town Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, IUCN/SSC Published by the Avian Demography Unit, University of Cape Town and the Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Avian Demography Unit Conservation Breeding Specialist Group University of Cape Town (IUCN/SSC) Rondebosch, 7701 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road South Africa Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124-8151 USA Telephone: (021) 650-2423 Telephone: (952) 997-9800 Fax: (021) 650-3434 Fax: (952) 997-9803 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.aviandemographyunit.org Website: www.cbsg.org © Avian Demography Unit and Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 2003 Cover photograph: African Penguin Spheniscus demersus, photographed by René Navarro Cover design: Samantha Petersen Typesetting: Samantha Petersen and John Cooper Final editing: John Cooper Printing: University Document Management Services, 161 Lower Main Road, Observatory 7925, South Africa All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the permission of the publishers RECOMMENDED CITATION FORMAT Du Toit, M., Boere, G.C., Cooper, J., de Villiers, M.S., Kemper, J., Lenten, B., Petersen, S.L., Simmons, R.E., Underhill, L.G., Whittington, P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Notice No
    Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Vol. 465 Pretoria 26 March 2004 No. 26189 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure STAATSKOERANT, 26 MAART 2004 No. 26189 3 GOVERNMENTNOTICE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND TOURISM No. 401 26 March 2004 SEA BIRDS AND SEALS PROTECTION ACT,1973 (ACT NO. 46 OF 1973) DRAFT POLICY FOR SEALS, SEABIRDS AND SHOREBlRDS IN SOUTH AFRICA TheMinister of EnvironmentalAffairs and Tourism has released a draft policy for seals, seabirds and shorebirds in South Africa. Members of the public are hereby invited to submit written comment on this draft policy. The drafl policy is available at www.deat.qov.za. Hard copies are available at the Department of EnvironmentalAffairs and Tourism: Branch Marine and Coastal Management, 5" Floor, Foretrust Building, Martin Hammerschlag Way, Foreshore Cape Town. Members of the public must submit written comment by no later than 16h00 on 31 May 2004. Comments should betied as follows: Draft Seals, Seabirds and Shorebirds Policy:2004 The Deputy Director-General: Marine and Coastal Management Comments may be - Hand delivered to the officesof Marine and Coastal Management at the above address; Posted by registered mail to Private BagX2, Roggebaai, 8012; E-mailed to [email protected]; or Faxed to (021) 425-7324. Should you have any telephonic enquiries, please do not hesitateto contact the Departmentat (021) 402-391 1, atternatively (021) 402-31 92. Your enquiries may be directedat Ms. Linda Staverees. 4 No. 26189 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 26 MARCH 2004 INTRODUCTION South African seabirds and seals are at present administered in terms of the Sea Birds and Seals Protection Act (SBSPA) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread-Wing Postures and the Water Repellency of Feathers: a Test of Rijke's Hypothesis
    SPREAD-WING POSTURES AND THE WATER REPELLENCY OF FEATHERS: A TEST OF RIJKE'S HYPOTHESIS A. M. ELOWSON Departmentof Zoology,University of Wisconsin,Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA ABSTRACT.--Rijke(1967, 1968) proposed that the water repellency of feathers and the presenceor absenceof spread-wingpostures in water birds could be explainedby a structural mechanismfirst describedfor textiles.The textile model predictsthat the tendencyof water dropletsto bead up on grid-like surfacesis a mathematicalfunction in which the primary independent variable is an index, (r + d)/r, where r is the radius of and d is one-half the distancebetween cylinders in the grid. Largerindices indicate more water-repellent surfaces. Rijke found larger indices in the feathers of ducks than in the feathers of cormorantsand anhingas;hence, he concludedthat the latter birds mustspread-wing to dry their wettable feathers. However, there were mathematical inconsistencies, undefined variables and con- cepts,and inadequatedata in Rijke'spapers. Despite these flaws, Rijke's hypothesis has been frequentlycited in the ornithologicalliterature. I report here my evaluationof the applica- bility of the textile model to feathersand my test of Rijke's prediction that speciesthat assumespread-wing postures when wet have smaller (r + d)/r values for their ramus and barbulestructure than speciesthat do not. I usedscanning electron microscopy to measure the featherstructure of 14 speciesof water birds in 6 differentcategories (breast, back, and four regionsof a remex). I found that the
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Cormorant Demism to the Subcontinent, Continued Monitoring Is Re- Bankduiker Garded As Important (Brooke 1984B)
    34 Phalacrocoracidae: cormorants this distance from the site of ringing (Cooper 1981). Juveniles disperse beyond the foraging range of adults, and have moved up to 459 km (Cooper 1981). The models show a dip for Lüd- eritz (2615CA) to St Helena Bay (3218C) Febru- ary–April, whereas south of St Helena Bay, report- ing rates are constant throughout the year. Reasons for these patterns are uncertain. Migration of adults is unlikely, but it is possible that dispersal of young after the breeding season increases con- spicuousness. Breeding: It breeds throughout the year with interannual variation in the main season (Rand 1960). In the southwestern Cape Province there is often a peak in numbers of active nests April– October, whereas at the populous colonies of Mercury (2514DB) and Ichaboe (2614BD) islands, breeding may be maximal in summer (pers. obs). The models suggest an intermediate June–January pattern for the northern Cape Province and south- ern Namibia. Regional differences in the breeding season need fuller investigation; they may be re- lated to diet. Off central Namibia, it eats mainly the Bearded Goby Sufflogobius bibarbatus (Craw- ford et al. 1985), whereas farther south various fish and invertebrates are fed upon (Rand 1960). Interspecific relationships: It has been dis- placed from nest sites by Cape Fur Seals Arcto- cephalus pusillus (Crawford et al. 1989), and may compete with other seabirds for breeding space at Mercury and Ichaboe islands (Duffy & La Cock 1985). Historical distribution and conservation: The historical distribution was probably similar to the present. It was listed in the first edition of South African Red Data book as ‘uncommon and vulnerable’ (Siegfried et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behaviour of Bank Cormorants in Namibia: Implications for Conservation
    Vol. 12: 31–40, 2010 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online June 4 doi: 10.3354/esr00288 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Foraging behaviour of bank cormorants in Namibia: implications for conservation Katrin Ludynia1, 2,*, Rian Jones4, Jessica Kemper4, Stefan Garthe3, Les G. Underhill1, 2 1Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa 2Marine Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa 3Research and Technology Center Westcoast, University of Kiel, Hafentoern 1, 25761 Buesum, Germany 4Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources, Lüderitz Marine Research, PO Box 394, Lüderitz, Namibia ABSTRACT: We studied the foraging and diving behaviour of male bank cormorants Phalacrocorax neglectus at Mercury Island, Namibia, during the 2007–2008 breeding season. The island hosts the world’s largest breeding colony of this endangered species. Population numbers are currently stable at Mercury Island, whereas numbers at other colonies in Namibia are decreasing, including those at formerly important colonies. This trend is presumably due to reduced food availability. At Mercury Island, bank cormorants foraged inshore (ca. 2 km off the coast) in close vicinity to their breeding site (ca. 3 km off the colony) and dived to an average depth of 30 m. Diet at Mercury Island was domi- nated by demersally occurring pelagic goby Sufflogobius bibarbatus. Our findings suggest that bank cormorants are benthic feeders along their entire range and that their foraging behaviour in Namibia does not differ from that suspected in South Africa. Further studies, extending to other breeding sites, are needed to explain the different population trends and how these may be influenced by food avail- ability.
    [Show full text]