DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogeny of the Phalacrocoracidae’

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogeny of the Phalacrocoracidae’ The Condor90:885-905 0 The CooperOrnithological Society 1988 PHYLOGENY OF THE PHALACROCORACIDAE’ DOUGLAS SIEGEL-CAUSEY Museum of Natural History and Department of Systematicsand Ecology, Universityof Kansas, Lawrence,KS 66045 Abstract. I undertooka phylogeneticanalysis of the Recenttaxa of Phalacrocoracidae usingqualitative osteological characters. The family comprisestwo subfamilies.The Phal- acrocoracinae(cormorants) comprise four generaof all-dark, littorine species:Microcarbo (microcormorants),Compsohalieus (marine cormorants), Hypoleucos (mesocormorants), and Phalacrocorax(macrocormorants). The Leucocarboninae(shags) comprise five generaof variablyplumaged, littorine, and pelagicspecies: Leucocarbo (guano shags), Notocarbo (blue- eyedshags), Nesocarbo (Campbell Island Shag), Euleucocarbo (New Zealandblue-eyed shags), and Stictocarbo(cliff shags).The relationshipof the anhingas(Anhingidae) to the Phalacro- coracidaeremains problematical and unresolved.Additional analyses using cranial or post- cranialcharacters produced comparable results, with the greatestdivergence obtained when only crania were compared.I discussthe nature of homoplasyin the family: cormorants are characterizedby convergences,shags by reversals.Plumage patterns have functional correlates,but phylogenetichistory may be the ultimate factor. Key words: Phalacrocoracidae;Anhingidae; Phalacrocoracinae;Leucocarboninae; cor- morants;phylogenetics; systematics; osteology. INTRODUCTION ment (Sharpe 1899, Peters 193 1, von Boetticher Since the very first attempts to reconstruct the 1937, van Tets 1976, Dorst and Mougin 1979); phylogeny of the Class Aves, there has been little incomplete treatments dealing with regional fau- controversy over which taxa comprised the Phal- nas, selectedspecies groups, or collection hold- acrocoracidae. More pertinent at the time was ings were more common (Ogilvie-Grant 1898; determining the relationships of the family with- Hutton 1903; Hall 1920; Mathews and Iredale in Pelecaniformes, and that of the order to the 1921; Falla 1932, 1937; van Tets 1965). Most rest of birds. The most widely acceptedphylog- recently, Cracraft (1985) investigated the system- eny was by Wetmore (1934) who positioned the atic relationships among Pelecaniformes, and family between the Sulidae and Anhingidae at confirmed the monophyly of the family. the “primitive end’ of the avian phylogeny. Lit- The classification generally followed in the tle effort was expended by systematists before northern hemisphere is of a single genus Phal- or after this to determine relationships within acrocorux (cf. Dorst and Mougin 1979) some- the cormorants. times supplemented by the monotypic genus The Phalacrocoracidaehave been considered Nunnopterum for the Flightless Cormorant ofthe to comprise approximately 30 speciesin one to Galapagos(cf. Sharpe 1899, Witherby et al. 1940). five genera;the most recent treatment recognizes Other taxonomies often remove the microcor- 29 speciesin one genus(Dorst and Mougin 1979). morants (sensu van Tets 1976) from Phalucro- There has been little consensusamong authori- corax into the genus Huliaetor [sic] (cf. Peters ties on the status of certain speciesand higher- 193 1). In the southern hemisphere, Phalucro- order relationships within the family, possibly corax is partitioned further by the use of Leu- because of sporadic and incomplete systematic cocarbo and Stictocarbo for various shagsof the treatments and changing conceptsof speciesand southern oceans (cf. Falla 1932, 1937). genera. Although cormorants are found world- An ancillary (and essentially trivial) issue has wide, and are usually abundant members of the been whether the anhingas (darters) constitute a littorine avifauna, in the past century there have distinct family or are a subfamily of the Phala- been only a few attempts at a family-wide treat- crocoracidae.Peters (193 l), Olson (1985) Beck- er (1986) and others consideredtheir differences to be sufficient for family standing (i.e., Anhing- * Received23 March 1988.Final acceptance7 July idae), while Dorst and Mougin (1979) Cracraft 1988. (1985) and many others found their similarities 18851 886 DOUGLAS SIEGEL-CAUSEY with the Phalacrocoracidae to be great enough cent Phalacrocoracidaeand Anhingidae using 137 to restrict it to a subfamily (i.e., Anhinginae). osteological characters. I present a hypothetical The first worldwide treatment was by Sharpe evolutionary tree for the family, and discussits (1899) who, without indicating methodology or implications for classification, morphological charactersused, placed all forms from the early convergence, and plumage patterns. Miocene to the Recent into Phalacrocorax, re- This article is dedicatedto the memory ofRalph serving separategenera for an Eocene taxon Ac- W. Schreiber, friend and teacher, who encour- tiornis spp., the Galapagos Cormorant (Nannop- aged me early on to study Pelecaniformes, and terum harrisz),and the extinct Pallas’s Cormorant supported my continuing research on cormo- (Pallasicarboperspicillatus).Because he listed the rants with insight and humor. His sudden death latter speciesalso in Phalacrocorax, this gave it diminishes us all. the notable distinction of belonging to two genera simultaneously. METHODS Peters (193 1) followed a traditional linear ar- rangement of species placed into two genera TAXA AND SPECIMENS (Phalacrocorax, Halietor), but without justifi- I studied skeletons of all Recent taxa of Phala- cation or methodology. Von Boetticher (1936) crocoracidae, except for the Indian Cormorant, considered certain aspectsof external morphol- Hypoleucosjiiscicollis, and some of the island ogy (e.g., rectrix number, abdomen color, etc.) forms of Notocarbo atriceps found in Antarctic and biogeography,and clusteredall of the extant waters (e.g., N. a. melanogenis, N. a. purpuras- forms by general similarity into three genera and tens, etc.), of which no specimens are readily 10 subgenera. He later revised this taxonomy available (Wood and Schnell 1986). In taxa (von Boetticher 1937) and altered speciesallo- known to be particularly variable or encom- cations, generic and subgenericnames, and pro- passingmany subspecies,I studied as many forms poseda resolution of the blue-eyed shagcomplex as possible. In all, I examined 226 specimens of (Leucocarbos.1.) of the southern hemisphere. 36 putative species of cormorants, shags, and Systematists studying southern hemisphere anhingas (Table 1). Except for certain New Zea- Phalacrocoracidaehave been facedwith a greater land shags(Nesocarbo campbelli, Euleucocarbo diversity of speciesthan elsewherein the world, chalconotus,E. colensoi,E. onslowi,E. ranfurlyi: and perhaps as a direct result of this, have pro- one skeleton each), three microcormorants @Ii- posed a variety of taxonomies (cf. Mathews and crocarbocoronatus, M. niger, A4. pygmaeus:one Iredale 1913, Falla 1937, and others). Of these, skeleton each), and the extinct Spectacledor Pal- only van Tets ( 1976) consideredall extant species. las’s Cormorant (Compsohalieusperspicillatus: Using similarities in external morphology and unassociated skeletal elements), I examined at behavior, he apportioned all members of this least two specimens of each species. family into two genera (Phalacrocorax, Leuco- carbo) with three subgenera in the former, and ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERS two in the latter genus. I used 137 osteological characters for the phy- Most recently, Dorst and Mougin (1979) fol- logenetic analysis (Appendix 1); less than one- lowing Peters (193 l), lumped all extant species fourth of these have been described or defined into a single genus Phalacrocorax. Assessments previously, but most are illustrated without iden- of possible specific and superspecific affinities tification in referencesaccompanying the char- were given by footnote but without justification. acter descriptions. Where possible, anatomical Neither Dorst and Mougin nor Peters presented descriptions follow Howard (1929) and Owre an explicit phylogeny of the family, but listed (1967); in many cases,however, suitable names speciesin a linear arrangement, “in taxonomic for featurescould not be determined throughthese sequence” (Peters 1931:iv, Mayr and Cottrell sources, and characters were described instead 1979:vi). by appearance or location. In some taxa previ- To date, no attempt has been made to present ously considered to be of subspecificrank (e.g., anything other than a linear arrangement of E. chalconotus, N. bransjieldensis,Stictocarbo speciesand only van Tets (1976) gave distinct featherstoni), I found sufficient diagnostic char- characters to delineate higher-order relation- acters(autapomorphies) to discriminate them as ships. I undertook a phylogenetic analysis of Re- species (see McKitrick and Zink 1988). In the CORMORANT PHYLOGENY 887 FIGURE 1. General tree of the Recent speciesof Phalacrocoracidae(CI = 0.678, length = 227 steps).Character changesare given in the indicated figureswhich follow. Speciesnames in bracketsindicate presumptiveplacement where no specimenswere available for study. case of N. atricepsand albiventer, two taxa cur- these outgroups and the method of Maddison et rently considered specifically distinct, I was un- al. (1984) to construct a hypothetical ancestor to able to discover any diagnostic osteologicalchar- root the evolutionary tree. I found no differences acters. For this analysis, therefore, they were in tree topology of the Phalacrocoracidae using treated together under the senior synonym, atri- actual outgroup taxa or a hypothetical ancestor,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BIRDS Masked Booby Semipalmated Plover Common Tern
    BIRDS Masked Booby Semipalmated Plover Common Tern APPROXIMATELY 170 SPECIES OF BIRDS HAVE BEEN SEEN ON THE ISLANDS; HOWEVER THE FOLLOWING LIST DOES NOT INCLUDE VISITING BIRDS ONLY RARELY SEEN. Nazca Booby Spotted Sandpiper Royal Tern BIRDS MARKED ‘E’ ARE ENDEMIC AND ‘I’ ARE INTRODUCED SPECIES. Blue-footed Booby Wandering Tattler Galapagos Dove Birds Red-footed Booby Greater Yellowlegs Dark-billed Cuckoo Blue-winged Teal Flightless Cormorant Willet Smooth-billed Ani White-cheeked Pintail Brown Pelican Lesser Yellowlegs Barn Owl Red Junglefowl I Great Blue Heron Whimbrel Short-eared Owl Pied-billed Grebe Great Egret Ruddy Turnstone Common Nighthawk American Flamingo Striated Heron Least Sandpiper Belted Kingfisher Galapagos Penguin E Yellow-crowned Night-Heron Short-billed Dowitcher Peregrine Falcon Waved Albatross E Osprey Wilson's Phalarope Vermilion Flycatcher Galapagos Petrel E Galapagos Hawk Red-necked Phalarope Galapagos Flycatcher Galapagos Shearwater E Galapagos Rail Red Phalarope Galapagos Martin Band-rumped Storm-Petrel Paint-billed Crake Swallow-tailed Gull Barn Swallow Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrel Common Gallinule Laughing Gull Galapagos Mockingbird Least Storm-Petrel Black-necked Stilt Franklin's Gull Floreana Mockingbird Red-billed Tropicbird American Oystercatcher Lava Gull Española Mockingbird Magnificent Frigatebird Black-bellied Plover Brown Noddy San Cristobal Mockingbird Great Frigatebird Pied Lapwing Sooty Tern Green Warbler-Finch Gray Warbler-Finch Vegetarian Finch Woodpecker Finch Large Tree-Finch Medium Tree-Finch
    [Show full text]
  • (Spheniscus Mendiculus) and Flightless Cormorants (Phalacrocorax Harrisi ): Genetics, Morphology, and Prevalence
    J. Parasitol., 93(3), 2007, pp. 495–503 ᭧ American Society of Parasitologists 2007 MICROFILARIAE IN GALA´ PAGOS PENGUINS (SPHENISCUS MENDICULUS) AND FLIGHTLESS CORMORANTS (PHALACROCORAX HARRISI ): GENETICS, MORPHOLOGY, AND PREVALENCE Jane Merkel*†, Hugh I. Jones‡, Noah K. Whiteman*, Nicole Gottdenker†, Hernan Vargas§, Erika K. Travis†, R. Eric Miller†, and Patricia G. Parker*† *University of Missouri–St. Louis, Department of Biology, 223 Research Building, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63121. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Gala´pagos penguins (Spheniscus mendiculus) and flightless cormorants (Phalacrocorax harrisi) live in small, isolated populations on the westernmost islands of Isabela and Fernandina in the Gala´pagos Islands, Ecuador. Between August 2003 and February 2005, 4 field trips, 2 in the cool, dry season (August 2003 and August 2004) and 2 in the hot, rainy season (March 2004 and February 2005), were undertaken; 298 Gala´pagos penguins and 380 cormorants were sampled for prevalence and intensity of hemoparasites. Microfilariae were found in both the penguins and the cormorants. Blood smears were negative for the presence of other species of hemoparasites. Overall prevalence of microfilariae across seasons was 42.0% in cormorants and 13.8% in the penguins. Intensity of infection was generally low (mean ϭ 3.2–31.7 in 25 fields across seasons and species) with the exception of a few individuals with markedly high intensities of parasites (Ͼ300 in 25 fields in 1 cormorant). Prevalence of microfilariae increased significantly over the 4 sampling periods for cormorants, but not for penguins. Prevalences were signifi- cantly higher in cormorants than in penguins for 3 of the 4 collecting trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History of Japanese Birds
    Natural History of Japanese Birds Hiroyoshi Higuchi English text translated by Reiko Kurosawa HEIBONSHA 1 Copyright © 2014 by Hiroyoshi Higuchi, Reiko Kurosawa Typeset and designed by: Washisu Design Office Printed in Japan Heibonsha Limited, Publishers 3-29 Kanda Jimbocho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 101-0051 Japan All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. The English text can be downloaded from the following website for free. http://www.heibonsha.co.jp/ 2 CONTENTS Chapter 1 The natural environment and birds of Japan 6 Chapter 2 Representative birds of Japan 11 Chapter 3 Abundant varieties of forest birds and water birds 13 Chapter 4 Four seasons of the satoyama 17 Chapter 5 Active life of urban birds 20 Chapter 6 Interesting ecological behavior of birds 24 Chapter 7 Bird migration — from where to where 28 Chapter 8 The present state of Japanese birds and their future 34 3 Natural History of Japanese Birds Preface [BOOK p.3] Japan is a beautiful country. The hills and dales are covered “satoyama”. When horsetail shoots come out and violets and with rich forest green, the river waters run clear and the moun- cherry blossoms bloom in spring, birds begin to sing and get tain ranges in the distance look hazy purple, which perfectly ready for reproduction. Summer visitors also start arriving in fits a Japanese expression of “Sanshi-suimei (purple mountains Japan one after another from the tropical regions to brighten and clear waters)”, describing great natural beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Establishments and Extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus Bassanus Colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008
    Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008 Robert T. Barrett Barrett, R.T. 2008. Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008. – Ornis Norvegica 31: 172-182. Since the last published review of the development of the Northern Gannet Morus bassanus population in Norway (Barrett & Folkestad 1996), there has been a general increase in numbers breeding in North Norway from ca. 2200 occupied nests in 1995 to ca. 2700 in 2008. In Lofoten and Vesterålen, however, numbers have decreased from 1500 occupied nests in 1989 to 500 in 2008, and what were the two largest colonies on Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa have been abandoned. Small colonies have, in the meantime, been established in the region, but these are all characteristically unstable. A new colony established in Troms in 2001 increased to 400 occupied sites in 2007, but the population dropped to 326 in 2008. Harassment by White-tailed eagles Haliaeetus albicilla is mooted as the main cause of the decline in Lofoten and Vesterålen. Robert T. Barrett, Dept. of Natural Science, Tromsø University Museum, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway. INTRODUCTION the well-established colonies, Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa in the north of the country, there were Apart from perhaps the Great Skua Catharacta even signs of declines between 1991 and 1995. skua, there is no species whose establishment as a This paper documents the subsequent fate of the breeding bird in Norway and subsequent popula- North Norwegian colonies, including the extinc- tion development has been so well documented tion of some and the establishment of others.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island
    A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island Operated by Chevron Australia This document has been printed by a Sustainable Green Printer on stock that is certified carbon in joint venture with neutral and is Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) mix certified, ensuring fibres are sourced from certified and well managed forests. The stock 55% recycled (30% pre consumer, 25% post- Cert no. L2/0011.2010 consumer) and has an ISO 14001 Environmental Certification. ISBN 978-0-9871120-1-9 Gorgon Project Osaka Gas | Tokyo Gas | Chubu Electric Power Chevron’s Policy on Working in Sensitive Areas Protecting the safety and health of people and the environment is a Chevron core value. About the Authors Therefore, we: • Strive to design our facilities and conduct our operations to avoid adverse impacts to human health and to operate in an environmentally sound, reliable and Dr Dorian Moro efficient manner. • Conduct our operations responsibly in all areas, including environments with sensitive Dorian Moro works for Chevron Australia as the Terrestrial Ecologist biological characteristics. in the Australasia Strategic Business Unit. His Bachelor of Science Chevron strives to avoid or reduce significant risks and impacts our projects and (Hons) studies at La Trobe University (Victoria), focused on small operations may pose to sensitive species, habitats and ecosystems. This means that we: mammal communities in coastal areas of Victoria. His PhD (University • Integrate biodiversity into our business decision-making and management through our of Western Australia)
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Vulnerability Assessments
    Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change, to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia: Bird Vulnerability Assessments Attachment (2) to the Final Report June 2011 Citation: Gonzalez, D., Scott, A. & Miles, M. (2011) Bird vulnerability assessments- Attachment (2) to ‘Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia’. Report prepared for the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. For further information please contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment and Natural Resources office. Online information available at: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose subject to the conditions that you (1) attribute the Department as the copyright owner of this publication and that (2) you obtain the prior written consent of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources if you wish to modify the work or offer the publication for sale or otherwise use it or any part of it for a commercial purpose. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Design and Production Manager Department of Environment and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of the Neotropic Cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) Brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) in Chile
    Original Article ISSN 1984-2961 (Electronic) www.cbpv.org.br/rbpv Parasites of the Neotropic cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) in Chile Parasitos da biguá Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) do Chile Daniel González-Acuña1* ; Sebastián Llanos-Soto1,2; Pablo Oyarzún-Ruiz1 ; John Mike Kinsella3; Carlos Barrientos4; Richard Thomas1; Armando Cicchino5; Lucila Moreno6 1 Laboratorio de Parásitos y Enfermedades de Fauna Silvestre, Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile 2 Laboratorio de Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán, Chile 3 Helm West Lab, Missoula, MT, USA 4 Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Santo Tomás, Concepción, Chile 5 Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina 6 Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile How to cite: González-Acuña D, Llanos-Soto S, Oyarzún-Ruiz P, Kinsella JM, Barrientos C, Thomas R, et al. Parasites of the Neotropic cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Aves, Phalacrocoracidae) in Chile. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2020; 29(3): e003920. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612020049 Abstract The Neotropic cormorant Nannopterum (Phalacrocorax) brasilianus (Suliformes: Phalacrocoracidae) is widely distributed in Central and South America. In Chile, information about parasites for this species is limited to helminths and nematodes, and little is known about other parasite groups. This study documents the parasitic fauna present in 80 Neotropic cormorants’ carcasses collected from 2001 to 2008 in Antofagasta, Biobío, and Ñuble regions. Birds were externally inspected for ectoparasites and necropsies were performed to examine digestive and respiratory organs in search of endoparasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Seabirds at Dassen Island, South Africa: Chances of Surviving Great White Pelican Predation
    Vol. 9: 125–131, 2010 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online January 11 doi: 10.3354/esr00243 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Breeding seabirds at Dassen Island, South Africa: chances of surviving great white pelican predation Martin M. Mwema1, 2,*, Marta de Ponte Machado1, 2, Peter G. Ryan1 1Percy Fitzpatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 2Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa Present address: Box 1019, 00100, GPO, Nairobi, Kenya ABSTRACT: Seabird predation by great white pelicans Pelecanus onocrotalus is an unusual phenom- enon that has become increasingly frequent in the Western Cape, South Africa. We report the scale of pelican predation and its impact on the breeding success of 5 seabird species monitored at Dassen Island in 2006. Pelican predation was observed on chicks of kelp gulls Larus dominicanus, crowned cormorants Phalacrocorax coronatus and Cape cormorants Phalacrocorax capensis. No predation on eggs was seen. Breeding success for 4 of the 5 species studied was low, with the white-breasted cor- morants Phalacrocorax lucidus having the highest breeding success (0.56 fledglings per nest). Cape and bank cormorants Phalacrocorax neglectus did not fledge any chicks, while crowned cormorants had a breeding success of 0.08 fledglings per nest. Kelp gulls had a hatching success of 46%, but only a few chicks fledged, giving a breeding success of 0.06 fledglings per nest. Pelican predation poses a threat to at least 3 of the 5 seabirds studied, all of which are endemic to southern Africa. Three spe- cies are globally Endangered or Near Threatened, and pelican predation places additional pressure on these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Patterns of Size and Shape of the Nasal Gland Depression in Phalacrocoracidae
    PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE NASAL GLAND DEPRESSION IN PHALACROCORACIDAE DOUGLAS SIEGEL-CAUSEY Museumof NaturalHistory and Department of Systematicsand Ecology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2454 USA ABSTRACT.--Nasalglands in Pelecaniformesare situatedwithin the orbit in closelyfitting depressions.Generally, the depressionsare bilobedand small,but in Phalacrocoracidaethey are more diversein shapeand size. Cormorants(Phalacrocoracinae) have small depressions typical of the order; shags(Leucocarboninae) have large, single-lobeddepressions that extend almost the entire length of the frontal. In all PhalacrocoracidaeI examined, shape of the nasalgland depressiondid not vary betweenfreshwater and marine populations.A general linear model detectedstrongly significant effectsof speciesidentity and gender on size of the gland depression.The effectof habitat on size was complexand was detectedonly as a higher-ordereffect. Age had no effecton size or shapeof the nasalgland depression.I believe that habitat and diet are proximateeffects. The ultimate factorthat determinessize and shape of the nasalgland within Phalacrocoracidaeis phylogenetichistory. Received 28 February1989, accepted1 August1989. THE FIRSTinvestigations of the nasal glands mon (e.g.Technau 1936, Zaks and Sokolova1961, of water birds indicated that theseglands were Thomson and Morley 1966), and only a few more developed in species living in marine studies have focused on the cranial structure habitats than in species living in freshwater associatedwith the nasal gland (Marpies 1932; habitats (Heinroth and Heinroth 1927, Marpies Bock 1958, 1963; Staaland 1967; Watson and Di- 1932). Schildmacher (1932), Technau (1936), and voky 1971; Lavery 1972). othersshowed that the degree of development Unlike most other birds, Pelecaniformes have among specieswas associatedwith habitat. Lat- nasal glands situated in depressionsfound in er experimental studies (reviewed by Holmes the anteromedialroof of the orbit (Siegel-Cau- and Phillips 1985) established the role of the sey 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment for Fisheries Operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands
    FAO International Plan of Action-Seabirds: An assessment for fisheries operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands by Nigel Varty, Ben Sullivan and Andy Black BirdLife International Global Seabird Programme Cover photo – Fishery Patrol Vessel (FPV) Pharos SG in Cumberland Bay, South Georgia This document should be cited as: Varty, N., Sullivan, B. J. and Black, A. D. (2008). FAO International Plan of Action-Seabirds: An assessment for fisheries operating in South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands. BirdLife International Global Seabird Programme. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, UK. 2 Executive Summary As a result of international concern over the cause and level of seabird mortality in longline fisheries, the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) Committee of Fisheries (COFI) developed an International Plan of Action-Seabirds. The IPOA-Seabirds stipulates that countries with longline fisheries (conducted by their own or foreign vessels) or a fleet that fishes elsewhere should carry out an assessment of these fisheries to determine if a bycatch problem exists and, if so, to determine its extent and nature. If a problem is identified, countries should adopt a National Plan of Action – Seabirds for reducing the incidental catch of seabirds in their fisheries. South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (SGSSI) are a United Kingdom Overseas Territory and the combined area covered by the Territorial Sea and Maritime Zone of South Georgia is referred to as the South Georgia Maritime Zone (SGMZ) and fisheries within the SGMZ are managed by the Government of South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands (GSGSSI) within the framework of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living (CCAMLR).
    [Show full text]
  • Plumage and Sexual Maturation in the Great Frigatebird Fregata Minor in the Galapagos Islands
    Valle et al.: The Great Frigatebird in the Galapagos Islands 51 PLUMAGE AND SEXUAL MATURATION IN THE GREAT FRIGATEBIRD FREGATA MINOR IN THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS CARLOS A. VALLE1, TJITTE DE VRIES2 & CECILIA HERNÁNDEZ2 1Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Campus Cumbayá, Jardines del Este y Avenida Interoceánica (Círculo de Cumbayá), PO Box 17–12–841, Quito, Ecuador ([email protected]) 2Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, PO Box 17–01–2184, Quito, Ecuador Received 6 September 2005, accepted 12 August 2006 SUMMARY VALLE, C.A., DE VRIES, T. & HERNÁNDEZ, C. 2006. Plumage and sexual maturation in the Great Frigatebird Fregata minor in the Galapagos Islands. Marine Ornithology 34: 51–59. The adaptive significance of distinctive immature plumages and protracted sexual and plumage maturation in birds remains controversial. This study aimed to establish the pattern of plumage maturation and the age at first breeding in the Great Frigatebird Fregata minor in the Galapagos Islands. We found that Great Frigatebirds attain full adult plumage at eight to nine years for females and 10 to 11 years for males and that they rarely attempted to breed before acquiring full adult plumage. The younger males succeeded only at attracting a mate, and males and females both bred at the age of nine years when their plumage was nearly completely adult. Although sexual maturity was reached as early as nine years, strong competition for nest-sites may further delay first reproduction. We discuss our findings in light of the several hypotheses for explaining delayed plumage maturation in birds, concluding that slow sexual and plumage maturation in the Great Frigatebird, and perhaps among all frigatebirds, may result from moult energetic constraints during the subadult stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Okhotsk Checklist (105 KB)
    Okhotsk Checklist Okhotsk Chapter of the Wild Bird Society of Japan Home Events News Checklist Bird Guide Birding Spots Surveys References Links About Us Contact Us -- Checklist of Birds in the Okhotsk Region Exactly 354 species of wild birds have been positively recorded thus far (as of 2 April 2013) in the Okhotsk (Sub-prefectural) region of Hokkaido. This compares with 633 species (excluding 43 introduced species) for all of Japan (Ornithological Society of Japan, 2012). It is a surprisingly large number in a region that has relatively few birdwatchers. The Okhotsk region is a wonderful field blessed with a great diversity of habitats. The checklist below contains all 354 of these species, plus 4 introduced species. If you happen to be in this region and spot any birds that are not in this list, please by all means report it to us! (via the Contact Us page). One point to note in this list, however, is that while we generally have one name in Japanese for our birds, in English there is often more than one name. There is also occasionally some disagreement in the references concerning scientific names. (Avibase is a good online source to check for updates to names in current use.) For now, we have included most of the recent names that we have come across for the benefit of our readers around the world. We will continue to edit this list over time based on new information as we receive it. To download a PDF version of the checklist page, click here → Download Okhotsk Checklist (105 KB).
    [Show full text]