DOCSLIB.ORG

In Tort Pursuit of Mass Media: Big Tobacco, Big Banks, and Their Big Secrets, 44 U

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Tort Pursuit of Mass Media: Big Tobacco, Big Banks, and Their Big Secrets, 44 U University of Massachusetts School of Law Scholarship Repository @ University of Massachusetts School of Law Faculty Publications 2014 In Tort Pursuit of Mass Media: Big Tobacco, Big Banks, and Their iB g Secrets Richard J. Peltz-Steele University of Massachusetts School of Law - Dartmouth, [email protected] Eric J. Booth Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umassd.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Intellectual Property Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Richard J. Peltz-Steele & Eric J. Booth, In Tort Pursuit of Mass Media: Big Tobacco, Big Banks, and Their Big Secrets, 44 U. Mem. L. Rev. 267 (2013). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository @ University of Massachusetts chooS l of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository @ University of Massachusetts chooS l of Law. THE UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS LAW REVIEW VOLUME 44 WINTLR 2013 NUMBER 2 Copyright 0 2013 The University of Memphis Law Review CONTENTS ARTICLES IN TORT PURSUIT OF MASS MEDIA: BIG TOBACCO, BIG BANKS, AND THEIR BIG SECRETS RichardJ.Peltz-Steele Eric J. Booth 267 SHELBY COUNTY AND THE END OF HISTORY Joel Heller 357 EFFECTS LIABLE TO JUSTICE: THE BANKRUPTCY CLAUSE, ARTICLE III COURTS, AND WHY THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN BELLINGHAM DWARF THOSE IN MARATHON AND STERN Adam M Langley 413 NOTES CORPORATE DIRECTORS [AND OFFICERS] MAKING BUSINESS JUDGMENTS IN TENNESSEE: THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE Brandon. Stout 455 TITLE IX: PROPORTIONALITY AND WALK-ONS Abigail M. Mabry 497 In Tort Pursuit of Mass Media: Big Tobacco, Big Banks, and Their Big Secrets RICHARD J. PELTZ-STEELE* ERIC J. BOOTH** I. RE-PUBLISHING CORPORATE SECRETS...... ............. 269 A. Introduction ................................... 269 B. Problem..................................272 C. Method...................... ............ 279 II. ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE PLAINTIFF VS. MEDIA DEFENDANT........................................283 A. Tortious Interference .................. ....... 285 1. Intent and Impropriety................ ...... 286 2. Common-Law Defenses and Associative Liability ....291 3. Liability Theories in Baer Bank and Big Tobacco ..... 293 4. Theory of Associative Liability. ............... 304 5. Defense Theories, Including Free Speech and Anti- SLAPP.................. ............. 305 6. Interference Liability Exposure in Sum......................318 B. Unfair-CompetitionLaw ............................... 318 1. Unfair Business Practice, Associative Liability, and Causation...................... ........ 319 2. Affirmative Defenses of Business Justification, Free Speech, and Anti-SLAPP ..........................323 3. Liability Theories in Baer Bank and Big Tobacco......328 * Professor, University of Massachusetts Law School. This Article was made possible thanks to a grant from UMass Law School. The authors are in- debted to Peltz-Steele's lead and co-author on Tort and Injury Law (2006), Pro- fessor Marshall S. Shapo, for his mentorship in torts, recognizing that failings of understanding in this article are ours alone. The authors also thank Misty N. Peltz-Steele, J.D., for invaluable background research. She deservedly antici- pates her M.L.S. in 2015. ** Attorney, Law Offices of Kenneth V. Kurnos, P.C. 267 268 The University of Memphis Law Review Vol. 44 4. Unfair Competition and the First Amendment............332 5. Unfair-Competition Liability Exposure in Sum..........333 C. Actions Related to the Theft of Trade Secrets: Conversion, Trespass to Chattels, Breach of Confidence, FurtherAssociative Liability, and Trade Secret Appropriation. ............................. 334 1. Conversion and Trespass................ ..... 334 2. Appropriation of Trade Secrets and Breach of Confidence ...................................335 3. Appropriation and Free Speech ............... 340 4. Liability Exposure in Baer Bank and Big Tobacco on Civil Theft and Related Theories ................ 344 5. Free-Speech Defense to Civil Theft and Related Theories...............................349 6. Liability Exposure on Civil Theft and Related Theories in Sum, and the First Amendment in Sum.................352 III. CONCLUSION ....................................... 354 Abstract This article examines potential civil liability under the mul- tistate norms of tort and closely related areas in the common law of the United States for the mass media re-publisherof leaked cor- porate secrets. The examination employs two fact patterns derived from real cases: one, contemporary, an international bank's grievance, never resolved on the merits in court, against the online publisher WikiLeaks; and second, conventional, a tobacco manu- facturer's grievance,feared but never filed, against the television newsmagazine 60 Minutes. The study assumes jurisdiction ar- guendo and examines liability theories in tortious interference; unfair-competition law; and conversion, trade-secret appropria- tion, and related theories of theft. The Article concludes that di- rect liability under any of these theories is unlikely, but that claims for associativeliability might well succeed. In reaching these con- clusions, the study analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of the claims and the vulnerabilities of the defenses, including the free- dom of speech. Ultimately, the Article demonstrates how nuanced questions offact would prove dispositive of liability, such that the liability exposure of the media defendant increases in proportion 2013 In Tort Pursuitof Mass Media 269 to its entanglement with an unscrupulous source. The discernible risk of liability counsels against an absolutist stance on the free- dom of information when media contemplate the republication of leaked corporatesecrets. The beginning of strife is as when one letteth out water: therefore leave off contention, before it be meddled with. -Proverbs 17:14 (King James Bible, Cambridge ed.) 1. RE-PUBLISHING CORPORATE SECRETS A. Introduction Neither governments nor corporations care to see their se- crets published online. Both expend resources to keep files under wraps, whether the government in protecting its national security plans or the corporation in protecting its proprietary product for- mulae. And both secret-keepers have long enjoyed resort to do- mestic courts to enjoin or punish unwanted revelations.' The global reach of the Internet has thrown a wrench in the works for these information owners.2 The Internet brought global publication within reach of the ordinary person with a laptop, re- gardless of originating locale. Secrets can be leaked more easily and quickly than in conventional media, and genies out of the bot- tle are difficult to recapture.3 1. Cf Transcriptof Secret Meeting Between Julian Assange and Google CEO Eric Schmidt, WIKILEAKS (Apr. 19, 2013), http://www.wikileaks.org/Transcript-Meeting-Assange-Schmidt.html ("There is one difference about the deployment of coercive force but even there we see that well connected corporations are able to tap into the governmental system and the court system and are able to deploy ... effectively deploy coercive force, by sending police to do debt requisition or kicking employees out of the office." (alteration in original)). 2. E.g., Pamela Samuelson, Principlesfor Resolving Conflicts Between Trade Secrets and the First Amendment, 58 HASTINGS L.J. 777, 796-99 (2007) (discussing vulnerability of trade secrets to Internet innovations). 3. Cf Richard J. Peltz, Fifteen Minutes of Infamy: PrivilegedReporting and the Problem of Perpetual Reputational Harm, 34 OHIo N.U. L. REV. 717, 743-45 (2008) (describing Internet properties of accessibility, longevity, and dynamism). 270 The University of Memphis Law Review Vol. 44 The law has been slow to catch up. Today, worldwide pub- lishers manage to evade the jurisdiction of domestic courts,4 some- times by escaping the reach of personal jurisdiction to initiate a cause of action,s and sometimes by placing technology beyond the reach of interlocutory and remedial court orders. 6 Much of the difficulty in online enforcement has arisen from international polit- ical disagreement over appropriate jurisdictional and free- expression norms where online publishing is concerned. These disagreements do persist. Fretting over the phenomenon of "libel tourism," by which defamation plaintiffs forum-shop among na- tions for weak free-expression defenses,8 the United States recently adopted legislation at the national level to block the enforcement of foreign defamation judgments.9 Iceland unveiled an ambitious 4. See, e.g., Jonathan Stray, Iceland Aims to Become an Offshore Haven for Journalists and Leakers, NIEMAN JOURNALISM LAB (Feb. 11, 2010, 9:00 AM), http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/iceland-aims-to-become-an-offshore- haven-for-journalists-and-leakers/ (reporting proposals in Icelandic parliament to create haven for whistleblowing through combination of source protection, free speech, and libel-tourism prevention laws). 5. See, e.g., Developments in the Law - The Law of Media, 120 HARV. L. REV. 1031, 1032-33 (2007) (comparing case law from United States and Commonwealth countries concerning jurisdiction over online-media defend- ants). 6. See, e.g., Adam Liptak & Brad Stone, Judge Shuts Down Web Site Specializing in Leaks, N.Y. TIMES (Feb. 20, 2008), http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/us/20wiki.html? r-0 ("The feebleness of the [injunction granted to plaintiff bank] suggests that the bank, and the judge, did not understand how the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 4 The Scholarship of Richard A. Epstein Summer 2009 Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age Catherine M. Sharkey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Catherine M. Sharkey, Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 677 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss4/2 This Legal Scholarship Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sharkey: Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age TRESPASS TORTS AND SELF-HELP FOR AN ELECTRONIC AGE Catherine M. Sharkey* INTRODU CTION ................................................................................................................ 678 1. SELF-HELP: THE MISSING THIRD REMEDY .......................................................... 679 II. CONCEPTUALIZING SELF-HELP IN CYBERTRESPASS DOCTRINE ........................... 684 A. Self-Help in Plaintiff's Prima Facie Case ................................................... 684 1. Threshold Prerequisite to Invoke Legal Process ................................... 684 2. Liability for Evasion of Self-Help ........................................................ 687 B. Self-Help "Opt-Out" as Affirmative Defense ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • February 26, 2021 Amazon Warehouse Workers In
    February 26, 2021 Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer, Alabama are voting to form a union with the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU). We are the writers of feature films and television series. All of our work is done under union contracts whether it appears on Amazon Prime, a different streaming service, or a television network. Unions protect workers with essential rights and benefits. Most importantly, a union gives employees a seat at the table to negotiate fair pay, scheduling and more workplace policies. Deadline Amazon accepts unions for entertainment workers, and we believe warehouse workers deserve the same respect in the workplace. We strongly urge all Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer to VOTE UNION YES. In solidarity and support, Megan Abbott (DARE ME) Chris Abbott (LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE; CAGNEY AND LACEY; MAGNUM, PI; HIGH SIERRA SEARCH AND RESCUE; DR. QUINN, MEDICINE WOMAN; LEGACY; DIAGNOSIS, MURDER; BOLD AND THE BEAUTIFUL; YOUNG AND THE RESTLESS) Melanie Abdoun (BLACK MOVIE AWARDS; BET ABFF HONORS) John Aboud (HOME ECONOMICS; CLOSE ENOUGH; A FUTILE AND STUPID GESTURE; CHILDRENS HOSPITAL; PENGUINS OF MADAGASCAR; LEVERAGE) Jay Abramowitz (FULL HOUSE; GROWING PAINS; THE HOGAN FAMILY; THE PARKERS) David Abramowitz (HIGHLANDER; MACGYVER; CAGNEY AND LACEY; BUCK JAMES; JAKE AND THE FAT MAN; SPENSER FOR HIRE) Gayle Abrams (FRASIER; GILMORE GIRLS) 1 of 72 Jessica Abrams (WATCH OVER ME; PROFILER; KNOCKING ON DOORS) Kristen Acimovic (THE OPPOSITION WITH JORDAN KLEPPER) Nick Adams (NEW GIRL; BOJACK HORSEMAN;
    [Show full text]
  • Respondeat Superior Principle to Assign Responsibility for Worker Statutory Benefits and Protections Michael Harper Boston University School of Law
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 11-13-2017 Using the Anglo-American Respondeat Superior Principle to Assign Responsibility for Worker Statutory Benefits and Protections Michael Harper Boston University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Common Law Commons, and the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Harper, Using the Anglo-American Respondeat Superior Principle to Assign Responsibility for Worker Statutory Benefits na d Protections, Boston University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper Series (2017). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/286 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. USING THE ANGLO‐AMERICAN RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR PRINCIPLE TO ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORKER STATUTORY BENEFITS AND PROTECTIONS Michael C. Harper* Introduction The common law remains an intellectual battle ground in Anglo‐ American legal systems, even in the current age of statutes. This is true in significant part because the common law provides legitimacy for arguments actually based on policy, ideology, and interest. It also is true because of the common law’s malleability and related susceptibility to significantly varied interpretations. Mere contention over the meaning of the common law to provide legitimacy for modern statutes is usually not productive of sensible policy, however. It generally produces no more than reified doctrine unsuited for problems the common law was not framed to solve.
    [Show full text]
  • In the End, Truth Will out - Or Will It
    Missouri Law Review Volume 52 Issue 2 Spring 1987 Article 2 Winter 1987 In the End, Truth Will Out - Or Will It Donald L. Magnetti Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Donald L. Magnetti, In the End, Truth Will Out - Or Will It, 52 MO. L. REV. (1987) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol52/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Magnetti: Magnetti: In the End "IN THE END, TRUTH WILL OUT" ...OR WILL IT? "MERCHANT OF VENICE," ACT II, SCENE 2 Donald L. Magnetti* I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 299 II. Tim COMMON LAW OF DEFAMATION ....................... 300 III. Tim New York Times RULE: PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND THE MEDIA 307 DEFENDANT ............................................ IV. THE PUBLIC FIGURE PLAINTI=: Gertz v. Robert Welch ...... 311 V. DEVELOPMENTS AFTER Gertz .............................. 318 A. Forum Shopping ................................... 318 B. Post-Gertz Decisions Add to the Confusion ........... 320 C. The Dun and Bradstreet Decision - A "Side-Step"... 326 D. Falsity - The Essence of a Defamation Action ....... 329 The Neutral Reportage Privilege ..................... 329 PriorRestraint Cases ............................... 331 The "False Light" Cases ............................ 332 The "Fictionalization" Cases ........................ 334 The "Libel-ProofPlaintiff" and "Subsidiary Libel" 336 D octrines.......................................... The Issue of Falsity ................................ 339 Sum mary .......................................... 342 VI. PROPOSED REMEDIES FOR IE DEFAMED PLAINT ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Edward R. Murrow
    Edward R. Murrow Edward Roscoe Murrow (April 25, 1908 – April 27, 1965), born Egbert Roscoe Murrow,[1] was an American broadcast journalist and war correspondent. He first gained Edward R. Murrow prominence during World War II with a series of live radio broadcasts from Europe for the news division of CBS. During the war he recruited and worked closely with a team of war correspondents who came to be known as the Murrow Boys. A pioneer of radio and television news broadcasting, Murrow produced a series of reports on his television program See It Now which helped lead to the censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy. Fellow journalists Eric Sevareid, Ed Bliss, Bill Downs, Dan Rather, and Alexander Kendrick consider Murrow one of journalism's greatest figures, noting his honesty and integrity in delivering the news. Contents Early life Career at CBS Radio Murrow in 1961 World War II Born Egbert Postwar broadcasting career Radio Roscoe Television and films Murrow Criticism of McCarthyism April 25, Later television career Fall from favor 1908 Summary of television work Guilford United States Information Agency (USIA) Director County, North Death Carolina, Honors U.S. Legacy Works Died April 27, Filmography 1965 Books (aged 57) References Pawling, New External links and references Biographies and articles York, U.S. Programs Resting Glen Arden place Farm Early life 41°34′15.7″N 73°36′33.6″W Murrow was born Egbert Roscoe Murrow at Polecat Creek, near Greensboro,[2] in Guilford County, North Carolina, the son of Roscoe Conklin Murrow and Ethel F. (née Lamb) Alma mater Washington [3] Murrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965)
    Law 580: Torts Thursday, November 12, 2015 November 10, 11, 12: • Casebook pages 813-843, 866-884 • Oral Argument #4 on Tuesday November 10 Chapter 11: Property Torts and Ultrahazardous Activities II. Property Torts D. Consent III. Ultrahazardous (Abnormally Dangerous) Activites Trespass to Land Prima Facie Case 1. Volitional Act 2. Intent to cause entry onto land 3. Entry onto plaintiff’s land Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) § 158. Liability for Intentional Intrusions on Land. One is subject to liability to another for trespass, irrespective of whether he thereby causes harm to any legally protected interest of the other, if he intentionally (a) enters land in the possession of the other, or causes a thing or a third person to do so, or (b) remains on the land, or (c) fails to remove from the land a thing which he is under a duty to remove. Affirmative Defenses: 1. Consent 2. Self Defense 3. Defense of Others 4. Defense of Property 5. Recapture of Property 6. Necessity Vincent v. Lake Erie Transportation (Minn 1910) p. 824 1. Who sued whom? 2. What happened? 3. What’s the procedural history? 4. What question(s) is/are before this court? 5. What does plaintiff argue? 6. What does defendant argue? 7. What does the court decide? 8. Why? “We are satisfied that the character of the storm was such that it would have been highly imprudent for the master of the Reynolds to have attempted to leave the dock or to have permitted his vessel to drift a way from it. …Nothing more was demanded of them than ordinary prudence and care, and the record in this case fully sustains the contention of the appellant that, in holding the vessel fast to the dock, those in charge of her exercised good judgment and prudent seamanship.
    [Show full text]
  • N Ieman Reports
    NIEMAN REPORTS Nieman Reports One Francis Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman Reports THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 21 ST CENTURY MUCKRAKERS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION HARVARDAT UNIVERSITY 21st Century Muckrakers Who Are They? How Do They Do Their Work? Words & Reflections: Secrets, Sources and Silencing Watchdogs Journalism 2.0 End Note went to the Carnegie Endowment in New York but of the Oakland Tribune, and Maynard was throw- found times to return to Cambridge—like many, ing out questions fast and furiously about my civil I had “withdrawal symptoms” after my Harvard rights coverage. I realized my interview was lasting ‘to promote and elevate the year—and would meet with Tenney. She came to longer than most, and I wondered, “Is he trying to my wedding in Toronto in 1984, and we tried to knock me out of competition?” Then I happened to keep in touch regularly. Several of our class, Peggy glance over at Tenney and got the only smile from standards of journalism’ Simpson, Peggy Engel, Kat Harting, and Nancy the group—and a warm, welcoming one it was. I Day visited Tenney in her assisted living facility felt calmer. Finally, when the interview ended, I in Cambridge some years ago, during a Nieman am happy to say, Maynard leaped out of his chair reunion. She cared little about her own problems and hugged me. Agnes Wahl Nieman and was always interested in others. Curator Jim Tenney was a unique woman, and I thoroughly Thomson was the public and intellectual face of enjoyed her friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicarious Liability
    STATE OF FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Kurt M. Spengler Wicker, Smith, O’Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A. 390 N. Orange Ave., Suite 1000 Orlando, FL 32802 Tel: (407) 843‐3939 Email: [email protected] www.wickersmith.com Christopher Barkas Carr Allison 305 S. Gadsden Street Tallahassee, FL 32301 Tel: (850) 222‐2107 Email: [email protected] L. Johnson Sarber III Marks Gray, P.A. 1200 Riverplace Boulevard, Suite 800 Jacksonville, FL 32207 Tel: (904) 398‐0900 Email: [email protected] www.marksgray.com A. Elements of Proof for the Derivative Negligence Claims of Negligent Entrustment, Hiring/Retention and Supervision 1. Respondeat Superior a. What are the elements necessary to establish liability under a theory of Respondeat Superior? Under Florida law, an employer is only vicariously liable for an employee's acts if the employee was acting to further the employer's interest through the scope of the employee’s employment at the time of the incident. An employee acts within the scope of his employment only if (1) his act is of the kind he is required to perform, (2) it occurs substantially within the time and space limits of employment, and (3) is activated at least in part by a purpose to serve the master. Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda, 506 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Additionally, once an employee deviates from the scope of his employment, he may return to that employment only by doing something which meaningfully benefits his employer's interests. Borrough’s Corp. v. American Druggists’ Insur. Co., 450 So.2d 540 (Fla.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Amendment in the Second Circuit: Reflections on Edwards V
    St. John's Law Review Volume 65 Number 3 Volume 65, Summer 1991, Number 3 Article 6 The First Amendment in the Second Circuit: Reflections on Edwards v. National Audobon Society, Inc., the Past and the Future Floyd Abrams Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN THE SECOND CIRCUIT: REFLECTIONS ON EDWARDS v. NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC., THE PAST AND THE FUTURE FLOYD ABRAMS* INTRODUCTION So often in its first century has the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit led the nation in the articulation of legal principles that it comes as no surprise to us when it does so again. But we pay a price for our expectations. As readers of Second Circuit opin- ions, we become jaded by the court's accomplishments-as if Ricky Henderson added one more stolen base to his record or Pete Rose eked out yet another hit. Some decisions that are recognized in their own field as being of the highest significance consequently fail to receive the more general legal recognition they deserve. In this offering I discuss one such case-a ruling, both creative and controversial, of the Court of Appeals in 1977 which remains a landmark in both libel law and first amendment law and which typifies, in my view, the extraordi- nary vision of the Second Circuit.1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Stealing 00A Adebanwi Fmt 11/23/11 12:01 PM Page Ii
    00a adebanwi fmt 11/23/11 12:01 PM Page i Authority Stealing 00a adebanwi fmt 11/23/11 12:01 PM Page ii Carolina Academic Press African World Series Toyin Falola, Series Editor Africa, Empire and Globalization: Essays in Honor of A. G. Hopkins Toyin Falola, editor, and Emily Brownell, editor African Entrepreneurship in Jos, Central Nigeria, 1902 –1985 S.U. Fwatshak An African Music and Dance Curriculum Model: Performing Arts in Education Modesto Amegago Authority Stealing: Anti-Corruption War and Democratic Politics in Post-Military Nigeria Wale Adebanwi The Bukusu of Kenya: Folktales, Culture and Social Identities Namulundah Florence Democracy in Africa: Political Changes and Challenges Saliba Sarsar, editor, and Julius O. Adekunle, editor Diaspora and Imagined Nationality: USA-Africa Dialogue and Cyberframing Nigerian Nationhood Koleade Odutola 00a adebanwi fmt 11/23/11 12:01 PM Page iii Food Crop Production, Hunger, and Rural Poverty in Nigeria’s Benue Area, 1920 –1995 Mike Odugbo Odey Intercourse and Crosscurrents in the Atlantic World: Calabar-British Experience, 17th –20th Centuries David Lishilinimle Imbua Perspectives on Feminism in Africa ‘Lai Olurode, editor Pioneer, Patriot, and Nigerian Nationalist: A Biography of the Reverend M. D. Opara, 1915 –1965 Felix Ekechi The Tiv and Their Southern Neighbours, 1890 –1990 Emmanuel Chiahemba Ayanga ôr The Women’s War of 1929: A History of Anti-Colonial Resistance in Eastern Nigeria Toyin Falola and Adam Paddock The Yoruba Frontier: A Regional History of Community Formation, Experience, and Changes in West Africa Aribidesi Usman 00a adebanwi fmt 11/23/11 12:01 PM Page iv 00a adebanwi fmt 11/23/11 12:01 PM Page v Authority Stealing Anti-Corruption War and Democratic Politics in Post-Military Nigeria Wale Adebanwi Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina 00a adebanwi fmt 11/23/11 12:01 PM Page vi Copyright © 2012 Wale Adebanwi All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Adebanwi, Wale.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Vicarious Liability 287
    A Theory of Vicarious Liability 287 A Theory of Vicarious Liability J.W. Neyers* This article proposes a theory' of vicarious liability Cet article propose une thiorie de la responsabilite which attempts to explain the central features and du fail d'autrui qui essaie d'expliquer les limitations of the doctrine. The main premise of the caracteristiques el les limitations centrales de la article is that the common law should continue to doctrine. La principale primisse de cet article eslque impose vicarious liability because it can co-exist with la « common law » doit continuer a imposer la the current tort law regime that imposes liability for responsabilite du fait d'autrui parce qu'elle peul fault. The author lays out the central features of the coexisler avec le regime actual de la responsabilite doctrine of vicarious liability and examines why the delictuelle qui impose la responsabilite' pour fauie. leading rationales (such as control, compensation, L 'auteur e'nonce les caracteristiques centrales de la deterrence, loss-spreading, enterprise liability and doctrine de la responsabilite du fait d'autrui et mixed policy) fail to explain or account for its examine les raisons pour lesquelles les principaux doctrinal rules. motifs (comme le controle. I'indemnisation. la The author offers an indemnity theory for vicarious dissuasion. I'etalement des penes, la responsabilite liability and examines why the current rules of d'entreyirise et la police mate) ne peuvenl m vicarious liability are limited in application to expliquer nijuslifier les regies de cette doctrine. employer-employee relationships and do not extend L 'auteur propose une thiorie des indemnltis pour la further.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neutral Reportage Privilege in Theory and Practice
    UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title When the Slander is the Story:The Neutral Reportage Privilege in Theory and Practice Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0d65t53k Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 17(1) ISSN 1073-2896 Author Laidman, Dan Publication Date 2010 DOI 10.5070/LR8171027133 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California When the Slander is the Story:The Neutral Reportage Privilege in Theory and Practice Dan Laidman* I. INTRODUCTION It is an angry time in American politics. Members of Congress have disputed the President's citizenship and accused him of promoting "Nazi" policies,' an ex-President has called a Congressman racist,2 and a member of the House of Representatives publicly questioned the sanity of a constituent who compared the President to Adolph Hitler.3 Traditional media outlets have chronicled the comments and then countless websites have republished them, leading some to find a causal connection between the explosions in new media and political rhetoric.' On the local level, municipal politics continue to generate fierce disputes which often lead to allegations of slander involving public officials.5 Only now, with the collapse of the * J.D., UCLA School of Law, 2010. Many thanks to Professor Gia Lee at UCLA Law School and to Joseph Doherty, director of the school's Empirical Research Group. 1 See Andie Coller, G.O.P. 'Cranks' Dominating Debate, POLITICO, Sept. 10, 2009, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27015.html. 2 See Jeff Zeleny & Jim Rutenberg, White House is Sitting Out Race Debate, N.Y.
    [Show full text]