DOCSLIB.ORG

Materiality, Technology, and Constructing Social Knowledge Through Bodily Representation: a View from Prehistoric Guernsey, Channel Islands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Materiality, Technology, and Constructing Social Knowledge Through Bodily Representation: a View from Prehistoric Guernsey, Channel Islands European Journal of Archaeology 17 (2) 2014, 248–263 Materiality, Technology, and Constructing Social Knowledge through Bodily Representation: A View from Prehistoric Guernsey, Channel Islands SHEILA KOHRING Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, UK The role of the human body in the creation of social knowledge—as an ontological and/or aesthetic category—has been applied across social theory. In all these approaches, the body is viewed as a locus for experience and knowledge. If the body is a source of subjective knowledge, then it can also become an important means of creating ontological categories of self and society. The materiality of human rep- resentations within art traditions, then, can be interpreted as providing a means for contextualizing and aestheticizing the body in order to produce a symbolic and structural knowledge category. This paper explores the effect of material choices and techniques of production when representing the human body on how societies order and categorize the world. Keywords: materiality, body, representation, stone, Channel Islands EVOKING THE BODY and experience to transfer anthropo- morphic characteristics and actions onto The body as a category for the creation of physical objects. If we imbue objects with symbolic and structural, or ontological, anthropomorphic characteristics as part of knowledge within a given society has been the cognitive process, it does not seem a well discussed (e.g. Mauss, 1979; Turner, great leap to assume, as many do, that 1984; Laqueur, 1990; Schilling, 1993; these objects can exert some level of Csordas, 1994; Grosz, 1995; Boyer, 1996; agency within society (as discussed by Gilchrist, 2000; Smith, 2004; Nanoglou, Latour, 1991, 2005; Gell, 1998). Material 2009a). Thus, displaying the body seems a has its own agency (Ingold, 2007; see also very personal, emotive act. When we Tilley, 2004) and this agency, along with encounter it in representations, the body that of the producer(s), is materialized can evoke a privileged intimacy or intuitive during the production process. These rep- knowledge. Boyer (1996) argues that the resentations are not static and their agency body is an intuitive ontological category may be triggered depending on their phys- based on an experiential understanding of ical and social context. self that is projected outwards onto others The potency of the image rests in the and onto the physical and material world. materiality of the representation and Hence, it is a cognitive extension of self engagement with representations within © European Association of Archaeologists 2014 DOI 10.1179/1461957114Y.0000000055 This license permits others to re-use, reproduce, re-distribute and/or build upon your work, including for commercial purposes, providing they acknowledge you as author, and attribute original publication to the journal. Downloaded fromManuscript https://www.cambridge.org/core received 14 August 2013,. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 30 Sep 2021 at 04:17:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/termsaccepted 30 January 2014,. https://doi.org/10.1179/1461957114Y.0000000055 revised 13 January 2014 Kohring – Materiality, Technology, and Constructing Social Knowledge through Bodily Representation 249 social contexts. When the body is materia- ways. Two frameworks, in particular, may lized in representation, particular have pertinence and could be seen to structuring principles—or aesthetics— overlap in useful and positive ways: embo- affect choices about what material and diment and corporeality approaches. If we technologies are used to make these consider how the materiality of human images (see Nanoglou, 2009b). Aesthetics representations can alter perception of the and structuring principles here are con- socially meaningful body, we can use the flated somewhat, but are connected in the concept of somatic modes of attention to sense that they are inherently social, his- link between ontologies of self and the torical, and mediate relationships by world around the self (Csordas, 1993: expressing idealized principles and prac- 138). The concept of corporeal realism, or tices specific to society (Gell, 1998). a recognition of the body as a shared bio- Representation of the body, however, is logical and social basis through which we not enough. The body-as-knowledge experience the world, is helpful in priori- needs a social context of engagement to tizing the body as a fundamental building structure and frame it. By engaging with block through which knowledge is created representation, a sense of bodily technique as it accepts knowledge as built upon the and aesthetic emerges and the knowledge real and concrete body-in-the-world (see transmitted through the category of body Schilling, 1993, 2005: 12–13). As a start- is reinforced. These engagements are per- ing premise, corporeal realism provides a formed and enacted within social framework on which we can consider how communities that provide the framework physical representations of the body might for understanding and making both be one way in which societies and com- actions and images meaningful. Continued munities materialize basic social categories engagement with body representations and ontological structures. within their socially appropriate contexts The basic premise for this interpretative provides meaning to the body. Engage- article arises from the belief that techno- ment defines what is an appropriate, logical practices are an embodied way that essential, and ideal socialized body within people create their physical world and that that society. New practices may emerge the human–material–technological and rework the materialized body, but the relationship is indivisible (Latour, 1991, images continue to shape social knowledge 2002; Ingold, 2000). I argue that there is until they are dispossessed and forgotten. a dialectic relationship between the way Understanding knowledge systems the body is materially produced and the through past representations is first and way the body itself is experienced and con- foremost influenced by our own aesthetic ceptualized. As such, the choices in the of body categories and what they mean to material used (stone, clay, bone), the tech- us. But, through contextualizing represen- niques employed in the production tations—not as self-evident and static (painting, incising, chipping) and the idealized forms, but as active agents in setting in which the finished object resides knowledge construction—they materialize (size and accessibility) all reflect percep- ontological categories of the past society. tions of the human body as an ontological This materialization can be explored category within a society. This paper through technology, technique, associated explores the construction of body images practices, and performances. Approaching in terms of material, technology, and this through appropriate theoretical frame- context. It draws upon three examples works, however, can be achieved in various from the island of Guernsey in the Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 30 Sep 2021 at 04:17:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1179/1461957114Y.0000000055 250 European Journal of Archaeology 17 (2) 2014 Channel Islands (United Kingdom), but is and occupation on Guernsey spanning not necessarily exclusive to these examples, from the Palaeolithic to the present (see and the material and techniques utilized in Sebire, 2005, for an overview). Approxi- the production of the bodily images dis- mately thirty miles northeast of the cussed were widespread across the French coastline, the community was, by continent and spanned from the Neolithic the Neolithic, linked into social networks well into the Iron Age. The recurrence of spanning the western European Atlantic material and techniques used to create fringe. This connection is evidenced by material bodies demonstrates the solidity the shared burial traditions and use of of these concepts as building blocks for communal chambered tombs such as Le social knowledge systems. Varde, Le Fouillages, and Le Creux és Faïes and by settlements with similar lithic and pottery traditions such as those found MAKING STONE BODIES:THE CASE FOR recently at Camp Varouf (Garrow & STELAE IN PREHISTORIC GUERNSEY Sturt, in press) and the airport site (de Jersey, personal communication, 2012). The small island of Guernsey lies off the While settlement and monumental Breton coast of France and is the second tomb structures tell a story of life and largest island in the Channel Islands death on the island, the standing stones (Figure 1). Physically separated from the that remain scattered across the island continent since the Mesolithic period, the provide another aspect to understanding island was not, however, socially isolated community, identity, and society. In par- and there is evidence of human activity ticular, several of these standing stones Figure 1. Map of Guernsey, Channel Islands and the location of the three images discussed in the text. Map: K. Boulden and S. Kohring. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 30 Sep 2021 at 04:17:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1179/1461957114Y.0000000055 Kohring – Materiality, Technology, and Constructing Social Knowledge through Bodily Representation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2260 B.C. 2850 B.C. 5940 ± 150 Gsy-36 A. Roucadour a 3990 B.C
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 8, 1966, P. 128-141] GIF-SUR-YVETTE NATURAL RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS I J. COURSAGET and J. LE RUN Radiocarbon Laboratory, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Gif-sur-Yvette (Essonne), France The following list shows the age measurements carried out from 1958 to March 1963 at the Radiocarbon Laboratory at Gif-sur-Yvette. This laboratory has been replaced by a new one whose first measure- ments are also given in this volume. It was equipped with 2 proportional counters similar to those used in Saclay laboratory and operating with 1 atm of pure C02. These counters were shielded by 15 cm lead, 5 cm iron and 1.5 cm of mercury. Data have been calculated on the basis of a C14 half-life of 5570 yr, in agreement with the decision of the Fifth Radiocarbon Dating Confer- ence. As a modern carbon standard, wood taken from old furniture was used. This standard was found equivalent to 950 of the activity of the NBS oxalic acid, if a 2% Suess-effect is adopted for this wood. SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS I. ARCHAEOLOGIC SAMPLES A. Southern France Perte du Cros series, Saillac, Lot Burnt wheat from Hearth III at entrance of cave of Perte du Cros, Saillac, Lot (44° 20' N Lat, 1° 37' E Long). Coll. 1957 by A. Calan; subm. by J. Arnal, Treviers, Herault. 4210 ± 150 Gsy-35 A. Perte du Cros 2260 B.C. 4800 ± 130 Gsy-35 B. Perte du Cros 2850 B.C. General Comment: associated with Middle Neolithic of Chasseen type un- (Galan 1958) ; Gsy-35 A may be contaminated.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-01-15 - Lecture 03
    2021-01-15 - Lecture 03 1.3 Megaliths and Stone Circles; Building as Memory 1) Architecture as Second Nature begins as creating mere dwelling… a place of protection from the forces of nature. Soon, building begins to take on more significance as it embodies symbolic and ritualistic meaning, becomes a place of reverence, and becomes a place of memorialization of the dead and the marking of time of human memory… 2) Vocabulary: • cairn — burial mound of stones (may have earth on top of stones). British Isles term. • dolmen — two megaliths (or more) standing upright and capped by a trabeated megalith • menhirs — raised stones, similar to a stele or gravestone but may have more meaning due to formal attributes of their arrangement • orthostats — vertical megaliths revetting the lower cella (chamber) of a proto-temple • poché — in an architectural diagram, the poché is the representation of material that forms space within a building. This is it’s first meaning. There are more. • revetment — sloping or battered walls reinforced with stronger material, usually stone • trabeation — a word that describes a post and lintel structural configuration • trilithon — a dolmen-type arrangement of three megaliths • tumulus — burial mound of earth, not necessarily including stone (but may) • vernacular — a building tradition based on tradition rather than formal education. May be based more on local programmatic needs (bank barns, tobacco barns, dogtrot houses), availability of materials, and traditions of building rather than any formal ideas. Vernacular architecture rarely has a known architect. 3) Examples of stone arrangements for memory and for celestial understanding: • Carnac, Brittany, France. Fields of menhirs — 4000 - 2500 BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 in France: Chasing the Neolithic - Elly’S Notes
    June 2016 in France: chasing the Neolithic - Elly’s notes I had a conference in the middle of June in Caen, Normandy, and another the end of June in Ghent, Belgium. I rented a car in Paris and drove to Caen and then vacationed in Brittany among the spectacular Neolithic monuments that remain from 6500 years ago. I also saw family in The Netherland before going to Gent. The Brexit vote happened during my stay as did real conversations about the E.U., very different from before. One conference participant cancelled because he was ashamed to be British. Map of the first part of my trip, with the arrows pointing to some of the major areas I visited in France Normandy I spent four days in Caen, Normandy, which was a city much beloved by William the Conqueror and his wife Mathilde. Bayoux, with its famous carpet, is not far but I didn’t visit that. Both William and Mathilda built monasteries to convince the pope into ok-ing their marriage. Below are some pictures of Caen. Very little but interesting street art The city of churches A famous recipee from Caen but not for vegans And more street art The parking garage I had trouble getting out Many bookstores… of! After Caen, I visited Mont St Michel; its size is immense. Before the church was built, there had been a pointed rock – pyramid-like. To construct the church, they first built four crypts around the point and then put the church on the plateau formed that way. The building styles vary depending in which ages they were built: Norman, to Gothic, to Classic.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Neolithic Archaeology
    Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 6 December 2019 doi 10.12766/jna.2019S.3 The Concept of Monumentality in the Research Article history: into Neolithic Megaliths in Western France Received 14 March 2019 Reviewed 10 June 2019 Published 6 December 2019 Luc Laporte Keywords: megaliths, monumentality, Abstract western France, Neolithic, architectures This paper focuses on reviewing the monumentality associated Cite as: Luc Laporte: The Concept of Monumen- with Neolithic megaliths in western France, in all its diversity. This tality in the Research into Neolithic Megaliths region cannot claim to encompass the most megaliths in Europe, in Western France. but it is, on the other hand, one of the rare regions where mega- In: Maria Wunderlich, Tiatoshi Jamir, Johannes liths were built recurrently for nearly three millennia, by very differ- Müller (eds.), Hierarchy and Balance: The Role of ent human groups. We will first of all define the terms of the debate Monumentality in European and Indian Land- by explaining what we mean by the words monuments and meg- scapes. JNA Special Issue 5. Bonn: R. Habelt 2019, aliths and what they imply for the corresponding past societies in 27–50 [doi 10.12766/jna.2019S.3] terms of materiality, conception of space, time and rhythms. The no- tion of the architectural project is central to this debate and it will be Author‘s address: presented for each stage of this very long sequence. This will then Luc Laporte, DR CNRS, UMR lead to a discussion of the modes of human action on materials and 6566 ‐ Univ. Rennes the shared choices of certain past societies, which sometimes inspire [email protected] us to group very different structures under the same label.
    [Show full text]
  • MEGALITHIC TOMBS in SOUTH SCANDINAVIA­ MIGRATION OR CULTURAL INFLUENCE?L
    L. KAELAS THE MEGALITHIC TOMBS IN SOUTH SCANDINAVIA­ MIGRATION OR CULTURAL INFLUENCE?l (Figs. 1-7; PI. I-II) CONTENTS lntroauction . 287 Dolmens and Passage Gmve�: burial rites, origin of dolmens, origin of passage graves; 289 Gallery Graves: burial rites, origin of gallery graves; 304 Migration or Cultuml Infiuence? 3 IO Absolllte Dates. 314 INTRODUCT ION In Scandinavia the term 'megalithic tombs' denotes those orthostatic chambered tombs built during the Neolithic. They are divided into three main types: dolmens, passage graves and gallery graves, this being also a chronological sequence as re­ gards their first occurrence in the area in question. Dolmens and passage graves are types of tombs built by the Funnel Beaker Cul­ ture in South Scandinavia and adjoining parts of North Germany. The first-men­ tioned began at the end of the Early Neolithic (EN), but continued in the early Middle Neolithic (MN); the latter were constructed only during the Middle Neo­ lithic, though they were not used by all South Scandinavian and adjoining groups. The gallery graves belong to the Late Neolithic (LN). In South Scandinavia there are in our opinion and contrary to older conceptions, no instances of chambered tombs which suggest a contact between the older tradition of passage graves and 288 L. Kaelas the younger one of gallery graves. At the time when gallery graves were being buiit, the building of passage graves had long since ceased. This is clearly shown in the grave finds. According to the evidence given by the pottery finds both in Sweden and Denmark, the building of passage graves seems to have ended before the middle of MN2.
    [Show full text]
  • CAIRN of BARNENEZ a Colossal Ancient Megalith
    www.tourisme.monuments-nationaux.fr CAIRN OF BARNENEZ A colossal ancient megalith. Situated on a promontory overlooking the sea, the Grand Cairn ACCESS de Barnenez is an unusual megalithic site in the north of the Finistère department. It was erected almost 6,000 years ago during the Neolithic era, a recent Prehistoric period corresponding to the emergence of agriculture, domesticated animals and the first houses. Revealing a perfect mastery of dry stone building techniques, it comprises eleven passage tombs, some of which contain mysterious engraved symbols... A recent archaeological analysis, which you will see during your visit, offers a new interpretation of the cairn, showing the development of funerary architecture and rites over several centuries, culminating in this immense stone structure 70 metres long and almost 8 metres high that has defied time and the actions of men. RECEPTION Subject to modification. On the coast between Roscoff and Perros-Guirec 13 km north of Morlaix on the Kernéléhen Open peninsula Septembre to April: From Morlaix: D76 Plouezoch, then peninsula from 10 a.m. to 12.30 p.m. and from 2 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. Barnenez May and June: from 10 a.m. to 12.30 p.m. and from Port de plouezoc’h 2 p.m. to 6.30 p.m. Cycle route “Vélodyssée”, Eurovelo 1 and July and August: from 10 a.m. to 6.30 p.m. Eurovelo 4: 1km Ticket office closed and last access to the monuments 30 minutes before the site closes. INFORMATION Closed 1st January, 1st May, 1st November, 11th November GRAND CAIRN DE BARNENEZ 29252 Plouezoc’h and 25th December
    [Show full text]
  • Spectroscopy of Palaeolithic Rock Paintings from the Tito Bustillo And
    Raman microscopy of prehistoric paintings in French megalithic monuments. Antonio Hernanz,1* Mercedes Iriarte,1 Primitiva Bueno-Ramírez,2 Rodrigo de Balbín-Behrmann,2 Jose M. Gavira-Vallejo,1 Delia Calderón-Saturio,1 Luc Laporte,3 Rosa Barroso-Bermejo,2 Philippe Gouezin,3 Ángel Maroto-Valiente,4 Laure Salanova,5 Gerard Benetau-Douillard,6 Emmanuel Mens7 1Departamento de Ciencias y Técnicas Fisicoquímicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Paseo Senda del Rey 9, E-28040 Madrid, Spain. 2Departamento de Historia I y Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Colegios 2, E- 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. 3UMR6566-CReAAH Université Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France. 4Departamento de Química Inorgánica y Química Técnica, Facultad de Ciencias, UNED, Paseo Senda del Rey 9, E-28040 Madrid, Spain. 5UMR 7401, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 21 allée de l'Université, 92023 Nanterre, France. 6Laboratoire d’Archéologie et d’Anthropologie Sociale, Z.A. Les Guigneries, 85320 La Bretonnière-La Claye, France. 7UMR 7055, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 21 allée de l'Université, 92023 Nanterre, France *corresponding author tel +34 91 3987377 Fax +34 91 3986697 [email protected] Supplementary Material Fig. S1. Location of megalithic monuments and stelae studied by µ-RS, SEM/EDS and XPS. (Author: R. Barroso-Bermejo). Fig. S2. The portable Raman microscope BWTEK innoRam 785H in the dolmen 3, orthostat 1, of the tumulus of the Mont-Saint-Michel (Carnac, Morhiban, France). Fig. S3. Barnenez tumulus (Plouezoc’h, Finistère, France). Fig. S4. Plan of the Barnenez tumulus (according to Giot, 1987) indicating the location of the chambers A and H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Monumentality in the Research Into Neolithic Megaliths in Western France Luc Laporte
    The Concept of Monumentality in the Research into Neolithic Megaliths in Western France Luc Laporte To cite this version: Luc Laporte. The Concept of Monumentality in the Research into Neolithic Megaliths in Western France. Journal of Neolithic Archaeology, UFG CAU Kiel, 2019, Hierarchy and Balance: The Role of Monumentality in European and Indian Landscapes, Special Issue 5, pp.27-50. 10.12766/jna.2019S.3. hal-02411694 HAL Id: hal-02411694 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02411694 Submitted on 15 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 6 December 2019 doi 10.12766/jna.2019S.3 The Concept of Monumentality in the Research Article history: into Neolithic Megaliths in Western France Received 14 March 2019 Reviewed 10 June 2019 Published 6 December 2019 Luc Laporte Keywords: megaliths, monumentality, Abstract western France, Neolithic, architectures This paper focuses on reviewing the monumentality associated Cite as: Luc Laporte: The Concept of with Neolithic megaliths in western France, in all its diversity. This Monumentality in the Research into region cannot claim to encompass the most megaliths in Europe, Neolithic Megaliths in Western France but it is, on the other hand, one of the rare regions where mega- JNA 21, 2019, 27 – 50 [doi 10.12766/jna.2019S.3] liths were built recurrently for nearly three millennia, by very differ- ent human groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arles-Fontvieille Megalithic Monuments: Astronomy and Cosmology in the European Neolithic
    The Arles-Fontvieille Megalithic Monuments: Astronomy and Cosmology in the European Neolithic Morgan Sterling Saletta Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2014 The School of Historical and Philosophical Studies History and Philosophy of Science The University of Melbourne i Abstract This thesis is an archaeoastronomical study of a group of megalithic sites in the south of France, the Arles/Fontvieille monuments, as well as a historiographical and epistemological study of the context of these sites within megalithic studies more generally. The Arles-Fontvieille monuments were deliberately aligned to the setting sun so as to be illuminated at important times of the year for cosmological and seasonal, ritual purposes. I have documented this seasonal illumination at three of the 4 intact sites and used 3D modelling to demonstrate the illumination in the fourth monument, the Grotte de Cordes. My archaeoastronomical research and interpretation of these monuments intervenes in debates concerning Neolithic and late prehistoric astronomy, cosmology and the origin, diffusion and evolution of megalithic monuments in Europe. Firstly, the similarity between the illumination at the Arles-Fontvieille monuments and the well-known illumination of monuments such as Maeshowe in Scotland and Newgrange in Ireland converges with a growing body of archaeological evidence suggesting that cosmological principles and practices, including those related to megalithic architecture such as passage graves, diffused in Western Europe by way of long distance contact and exchange networks, during the late 4th and early 3rd millennia BC, a period which saw the florescence of major monumental centers in Atlantic Europe as well as at Arles-Fontvieille.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Durham Research Online Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 07 June 2012 Version of attached file: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached file: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Scarre, Chris (2009) ’Stones with character : animism, agency and megalithic monuments.’, in Materialitas: working stone, carving identity. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 9-18. Further information on publisher’s website: http://www.oxbowbooks.com/bookinfo.cfm/ID/86804 Publisher’s copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 — Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 http://dro.dur.ac.uk Stones with character: animism, agency and megalithic monuments Chris Scarre Department of Archaeology, Durham University Abstract Recent studies of megalithic monuments have shown how they incorporate blocks, sometimes taken from different locations, which link the monuments to features of their local landscapes. The slabs were often left unworked, or only minimally shaped, which would have helped preserved the visual resemblance of the stones to the outcrops or boulder fields from which they were derived.
    [Show full text]
  • MEGALITH BUILDERS of WESTERN EUROPE by the Same Author
    GOVERNMENT OE INDIA DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL LIBRARY Class. Call No.. _9AS. 4 P_Parc .A. 79. THE MEGALITH BUILDERS OF WESTERN EUROPE By the same author I942. TUP. THREE ACES I9JO. THE PREHISTORIC CHAMBER TOMBS OP ENGLAND AND WALES X9J0. A HUNDRED TEARS OP ARCHAEOLOGY 1951. (With S. Piggott) A PICTURP. BOOK OP ANCIENT BRITISH ART X9J5. LASCAUX AND CARNAC 1956. (With T. G. E. Powell) barclodud t gawres The Megalith Builders of Western Europe GLYN DANIEL FELLOW OF ST JOHN’S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, AND LECTURER IN ARCHAEOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY f j.. HUTCHINSON OF LONDON HUTCHINSON & CO. {Publishers) LTD 178-102 Great Port land Street, Lontlon, W.\ London Melbourne Sydney Auckland Bombay Toronto Johannesburg New York * First P u bli sited 1958 This book, commissioned for the Archae¬ ology Section of the Hutchinson University Library (Editor Professor C. F. C. I lawkes), is first being issued in this larger format with additional half-tone illustrations LI»’ziiz-b;. Aco. "No • ^ . 1)11,0 " C\, . Call No . <£) G. E. Daniel 1958 This book, has been set in Garamond type face. It has been printed in Great Britain by Tonbridge Printers Ltd, Tonbridge, Kent, on Antique Wove paper and bound by Taylor Garnett Evans & Co., Ltd., in Watford, Herts For ELSIE CLIFFORD Notgrovc - Nympsfield - Rodmarton CONTENTS List of Plates 9 List of Figures 10 Preface 11 1 Megalithic Tombs- and Temples 13 2 The Prehistoric Collective Tombs of Western Europe 29 3 Northern Europe and Iberia 5 2 4 The West Mediterranean 76 j France * 89 6 The Bridsh Isles 105 7 Conclusion 120 Books for Further Reading 13 3 Index 137 LIST OF PLATES BETWEEN PAGES 64 & 65 I A hunched in Holland and a Portuguese an/a.
    [Show full text]