Free PDF of the Book

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Free PDF of the Book Children and violence Report of the Gulbenkian Foundation Commission The UK branch of the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation has taken the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, ‘protecting the dignity, equality and human rights’ of children, as a broad framework within which to initiate and support specific projects of benefit to children and young people. Particular attention is given to strategic national and regional proposals which reflect the values contained in the Convention. Published by Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation London 1995 Distribution by Turnaround Distribution Ltd, 27 Horsell Road, London N5 1XL. 0171 609 7836 © 1995 Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Published by Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation 98 Portland Place, London W1N 4ET. Telephone 0171 636 5313 Designed by Susan Clarke for Expression Printers Ltd Cover design by Chris Hyde Printed by Expression Printers Ltd, London N5 1JT ISBN 0–903319–75–6 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Contents Introduction page 1 The Commission’s aims and working definitions 4 Acknowledgements 5 The Commission: members’ biographies 6 Executive summary 10 Priority recommendations 18 Section 1 Why children become violent 29 Introduction 31 Genetic factors 38 Biological factors 41 Gender 41 Conditions affecting brain function 42 Environmental or acquired biological factors 44 Brain Injury 44 Nutrition 45 Influence of the family and parenting 46 Family structure and break-up 47 Parenting styles 48 Monitoring/supervision of children 50 Discipline and punishment 50 Society’s attitudes and norms of behaviour 53 Inequality and discrimination 56 The influence of school and peers 59 Violent gangs and mob violence 62 Mental illness and violence 63 Substance abuse 67 Alcohol 67 Illegal drugs 68 Effects of violent images 69 References 73 iii iv / Contents Section 2 Reducing violence involving children – discussion and recommendations 77 Part 1 Working towards a non-violent society: national and local commitment and co-ordination 79 Making a commitment to non-violence 80 Translating the commitment into action: checklists for working towards a non-violent society 82 A UK-wide media campaign to promote non-violent values and attitudes 87 Co-ordinating a UK-wide strategy against violence 89 Central government 89 Principles for implementation 93 Regional co-ordination 94 Local co-ordination 96 Local community safety strategies 96 Local planning initiatives 100 Local co-ordination of child protection 101 Children’s services plans 104 Domestic violence forums 106 Neighbourhood responsibility for child safety 107 Volunteers in violence prevention 108 Part 2 Policies for children and families which support violence prevention 111 Challenging inequality and poverty 112 Discrimination 115 Parental responsibility for children 117 Family support 120 Societal support for individual parents 121 Community-based support for parents and their children 122 Daycare 125 Curriculum for daycare 127 Parent education, preparation for parenthood, and family life education 129 Physical punishment and deliberate humiliation of children 133 Pre-schooling 137 Schools and the education service 139 The curriculum 141 Bullying prevention 143 Corporal punishment in private schools 145 Children’s opportunities for play and leisure 147 The health service 151 Contents / v Health visiting 152 School nursing 153 Parent education 153 Teenage pregnancy 154 Accidents 155 Medical interventions which may constitute violence 156 Mental health services 158 Children in care and leaving care 161 ‘Domestic’ or family violence 162 Sexual abuse 167 Child prostitution 171 Criminal justice 172 Aims of criminal justice system 173 Age of criminal responsibility 175 Restriction of liberty 177 Car crime 179 Part 3 Other issues 183 Child death inquiries 184 Infanticide 187 Suicide and self-harm 189 Arrangements to prevent people who threaten children’s welfare gaining inappropriate access to them 193 Alcohol and drug abuse 195 Children and violent conflict: Northern Ireland 198 Violent images 202 Television 203 Films, videos, games etc. – censorship and classification 205 Pornography, children and violence 211 Aggressive toys 213 Victims of violence 215 Traditional practices 217 Sport and violence involving children 218 Boxing 220 Guns and weapons 224 Information and research on violence involving children 227 References 232 Appendices 1 Checklist for working towards a non-violent society 241 2 The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child – setting an agenda for policy development on violence involving children 251 vi / Contents 3 The state of our knowledge on prevalence of violence involving children in the UK: Part 1 Violence to children and young people 256 Part 2 Violence by children and young people 262 4 Local community safety strategies and the prevention of violence involving children: results of the Commission’s survey 267 5 Seeking children’s and young people’s views on how to reduce violence involving children 286 6 List of those who provided information to Commission 292 Index 305 vi Introduction The Commission on Children and Violence was conceived during a wave of media debate and apparent public concern at levels of violence involving children, and in particular at perceived levels of violence by children. The Commission has no desire to add to unrealistic fears of violence to or by children; its aims have been to research and summarise available knowledge of the extent of violence involving children, and why children become violent, and then to make recommendations for reducing all forms of inter- personal violence involving children. In comparison with the USA, levels of inter-personal violence in the UK are very modest, and there is recent evidence that in comparison with some European countries, levels of violence by children in the UK are low. In terms of trends it appears that children’s involvement in some but not all crimes of violence in the UK has increased over the last decade. It remains true that only a very small proportion of children (three out of four of them male) get involved in committing violent offences. There is increased knowledge of and sensitivity about violence to children, in particular sexual abuse, and bullying and other ill-treatment in institutions; it is not possible to tell whether the incidence of these and other forms of violence to children has increased or is simply more generally recognised, and there are obvious problems about building any accurate picture of the extent of violence to children within families. In general, children are far more often victims of violence than perpetrators. Some age groups of children are disproportionately at risk of serious violence. One of the most disturbing social statistics is that babies aged under one are the age group most at risk of homicide; while the number of cases per year is small, the risk is four times as great as for any other age group. It seems to the Commission that as individuals and as a society we are now faced with a crucial choice in relation to violence. No nation can afford to be complacent about any level of inter-personal violence. If we are to ensure that we do not follow the path of the USA, we have to commit ourselves to work towards a non-violent society. In America a child dies from gunshot wounds 1 2 / Introduction every two hours; between 1979 and 1991 almost 50,000 American children were killed by firearms – equal to the number of US battle casualties in the Vietnam war; homicide is the 12th leading cause of death, and for black youths aged between 15 and 34 it is the leading cause of death. Bullet-proof vests, metal detectors and armed police are common in big-city schools. Nobody, surely, wants a violent society. This is an issue on which we can expect and demand a consensus. A commitment to non-violence does not have to be pacifist, or non-competitive. At the moment, our attitudes to violence, and in particular to violence involving children, are inconsistent. We do not consistently denounce violence. Macho male stereotypes are promoted and admired. Our appetite for very violent images appears to be on the increase. We still enthusiastically follow sports in which deliberately injuring opponents is the central aim. Politicians and other public figures still advocate violent punishments for children, despite the evidence that they will undoubtedly make the problem of violence worse. Physical punishment of children remains legally and largely socially acceptable – unique among forms of inter-personal violence. Action to reduce and prevent violence is generally unco-ordinated (apart from child abuse protection, which only covers part of the full spectrum of violence to children). It is given no particular priority within crime prevention. The Commission believes that the current context of heightened concern over violence involving children makes this the right moment to promote a formal and active commitment to non-violence. While the overall aim is the creation of a safe, non-violent society for all, our focus is on children because there is ample evidence to show that early intervention is vital to prevent the development of violent attitudes: that what happens in the early years, and in particular within the family and in schools, is most influential in determining attitudes to violence. We know more than enough of the factors that interact to cause violence to be able to promote detailed positive strategies, above all, strategies for positive parenting. Our recommendations seek to make the commitment to non-violence, and the work required to build a non-violent policy, as comprehensive as possible. We believe the commitment should be perceived as having the same priority as a commitment to equal opportunities. Of course much is already being done, consciously or unconsciously, to reduce or prevent violence involving children in the home, in schools and other institutions, and in community safety and child protection strategies locally and nationally.
Recommended publications
  • Trafford Against Bullying
    Trafford Against Bullying (TAB) Guidance 2010 ‘Working together with adults, children, young people and parents to create a community where bullying is not tolerated.’ Trafford Against Bullying (TAB) "Bullying is among the top concerns that parents have about their children’s safety and well-being at and on the way to and from school. Bullying is also a top concern of children and young people themselves. Bullying makes the lives of its victims a misery: it undermines their confidence and self esteem; and destroys their sense of security. Bullying impacts on its victims’ attendance and attainment at school, marginalises those groups who may be particular targets for bullies and can have a life-long negative impact on some young people’s lives. At worst, bullying has been a factor in a young person’s suicide." Safe to Learn – Executive Summary The ‘Safe from Bullying’ suite of Guidance is produced by the DofE and is constantly being updated. It includes specific guidance for a variety of settings. Publications are free of charge and can be ordered in hard copy or downloaded at www.teachernet.gov.uk/publications Guidance 2010 Trafford Against Bullying (TAB) Who is this guidance for? Our Expectations This guidance was created to be used within Trafford aims to ensure that all communities any community where children and young involved with children & young people do people live, work, learn or enjoy recreational everything they can to keep them safe from time. bullying, and encourages them to follow the principles of the TAB Charter by: Why have we published this • Having a clear strategy to promote and document? support an Anti-Bullying ethos • Having a named senior Lead for Trafford Children and Young People’s Anti-Bullying Service (CYPS), regards any bullying as unacceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Why My Child? a Guide for Parents of Children Who Have Been Sexually Abused
    Why my child? A guide for parents of children who have been sexually abused CONTENTS Introduction 4 What is Child Sexual Abuse? 4 Children’s Reactions 5 Behaviour Changes 6 Dealing With The Police 6 Parents’ Feelings 7 Incest 8 What If You Were Sexually Abused? 9 Your Feelings Are Natural 9 What About Your Family? 9 Whose Fault Is It? 10 Why Didn’t My Child Tell? 11 When a Child Tells - 12 Ways to Respond What Should We Say to Everyone? 13 How Can I Help My Child? 14 Take Care of Yourself 16 Teaching Personal Safety Skills 17 What if my Child is Sexually 18 Provocative with another Child? Commonly Asked Questions 20-21 Questions That Children Ask 21-22 Helpful Organisations 23 INTRODUCTION challenges, but with the help of this guide, other resources, and the support of those The sexual abuse of your child can unleash you turn to - family, professionals, self-help one of the most difficult crises you and groups - you will survive. What is more, your your family will ever encounter. Besides the child can go on to lead a happy, productive stress of negotiating the criminal justice life. It will take time and effort, but the work system, helping your child, and supporting is worth it. your family, can create nearly unbearable pressure, and you may feel you don’t know WHat IS CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? where to turn. Your child could be displaying Child sexual abuse is any sexual exploitation a bundle of contradictory behaviours, and of a child under the age of sixteen for the be full of confused emotions - angry one sexual pleasure or profit of an adult or much moment, withdrawn the next.
    [Show full text]
  • Calouste Gulbenkian's Long Path, from His Childhood in Istanbul to The
    CALOUSTE GULBENKIAN PRIZE (2017-2021) Regulation 2017 edition INTRODUCTION Calouste Gulbenkian’s long path, from his childhood in Istanbul to the latter years of his life in Lisbon (emblematic cities at the eastern and western edges of Europe), shaped his personality and influenced the Foundation that he decided to create in Portugal as a Portuguese institution. A pioneer in the oil industry, a demanding art collector, a diplomat and philanthropist, Calouste Gulbenkian was a perfect example of the synthesis of the eastern culture of his birth and origins, and the western culture in which he was educated and lived. Other revealing features of his character were his great sensitivity towards the harmony of nature and a particular taste for admiring its beauty. The Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, an international philanthropic institution, open to the world, seeks to support actions which contribute to the construction of a fairer and more solidary society, where equal opportunities and sustainability help to prepare the citizens of the future. The Calouste Gulbenkian Prize is given annually. It aims to pay tribute to the Founder, recognizing individuals or institutions that have distinguished themselves, due to their relevance and work in the area of Human Rights. FIRST Objective and Term 1. The Calouste Gulbenkian Prize aim to recognise an individual or a private non- profit legal person who have distinguished themselves internationally in the defence and implementation of Human Rights. In 2017, special attention will be given to refugee issues. SECOND Value The value of the Calouste Gulbenkian Prize will be 100,000 € (one hundred thousand euros). THIRD Decision Making Procedure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is 'Workplace Bullying'
    ‘The Boy In The Photograph’ ANTI-BULLYING PRESENTATION PERFORMED BY ROB HIGGS ‘The Boy In The Photograph’ is inspired by my own experiences... AM I BEING BULLIED? Several Times On Purpose The ‘Victim State’ FEAR SHAME SELF- BULLYING Strategies To Help Yourself If You Are Ever Bullied… Smash The Silence: Tell Someone & Report It Immediately. Allow Others To Support You. Keep A Diary. Collect Evidence. Build Confidence & Self-Esteem through Personal Challenge. Acknowledge your emotions. It’s OK To Feel Angry or Scared. Release the energy in a therapeutic way: Writing Performing Creating https://www.childline.org.u k/toolbox/art-box/ ‘BANTER’ vs ‘BULLYING’ http://www.telegraph.c o.uk/news/uknews/defe nce/11844639/Army- must-not-lose-banter-in- harassment- crackdown.html ROLEPLAY LOSER YOUR MUM.. UGLY WEIRDO THICK FREAK FAT I DON’T LIKE YOU. Creative Exercise Idea 1: Deflect With Humour Idea 2: Broken Record: “I don’t lose all the time” “Whatever, whatever, whatever” “Clearly not” or “That’s not true” “Thanks!..Thanks!..Thanks!..” “I’m pretty clever actually” “Blah, blah, blah..” “Thanks so much for telling me that.” Idea 3: Direct Question: “Everyone’s a bit weird. It’s a weird world.” “Is this banter or bullying?” “Great banter” “Why are you saying that?” “#Drama” or “#Banter” “What do you mean by that?” “Oh well” or “I don’t need you to like me” Idea 4: Use an ‘I Feel..’ Statement: “My Mum’s great, thanks for asking.” “You can’t talk to me like that.” “I’m just going to write that “You keep saying that…..and it down…and then not care.” makes me feel like…….” Top Tips.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis
    Taboo : why are real-life British serial killers rarely represented on film? EARNSHAW, Antony Robert Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/20984/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/20984/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. Taboo: Why are Real-Life British Serial Killers Rarely Represented on Film? Antony Robert Earnshaw Sheffield Hallam University MA English by Research September 2017 1 Abstract This thesis assesses changing British attitudes to the dramatisation of crimes committed by domestic serial killers and highlights the dearth of films made in this country on this subject. It discusses the notion of taboos and, using empirical and historical research, illustrates how filmmakers’ attempts to initiate productions have been vetoed by social, cultural and political sensitivities. Comparisons are drawn between the prevalence of such product in the United States and its uncommonness in Britain, emphasising the issues around the importing of similar foreign material for exhibition on British cinema screens and the importance of geographic distance to notions of appropriateness. The influence of the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) is evaluated. This includes a focus on how a central BBFC policy – the so- called 30-year rule of refusing to classify dramatisations of ‘recent’ cases of factual crime – was scrapped and replaced with a case-by-case consideration that allowed for the accommodation of a specific film championing a message of tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 Muncie 4E BAB1408B0166
    00_Muncie_4e_BAB1408B0166_Prelims.indd 3 18-Nov-14 9:13:10 PM 1 Youth Crime: Representations, Discourses and Data Chapter 1 examines: • the concepts of ‘crime’, ‘youth’, ‘criminalization’ and ‘social construction’; • how young people have come to be regarded as a threat; • how the ‘problem of youth’ is frequently collapsed into the problem of crime and disorder; • how young people are represented in media and political discourses; • the reliability of statistical measures of youth offending; • the gendered nature of offending; • the relationship between gangs and violent crime; • the relationship between drug use and criminality. Key terms corporate crime; crime; criminalization; delinquency; demonization; deviance; discourse; folk devil; gang; hidden crime; moral panic; official statistics; protective factors; recording of crime; reporting of crime; representation; risk factors; self-report studies; social con- structionism; status offence; youth This introductory chapter is designed to promote a critical understanding of the relationship between youth and crime. The equation of these two terms is widely employed and for many is accepted as common sense. Stories about youth and crime are a mainstay of most forms of media. Official crime statistics are readily and uncritically recited to substantiate a view that youth crime and disorder are now ‘out of control’. But how far do the media reflect social reality and how much are they able to define it? How valid and reliable is statistical evidence? By asking these questions, the chapter draws attention to how the state of youth and the 01_Muncie_4e_BAB1408B0166_Ch-01.indd 1 11/18/2014 8:40:00 PM problem of crime come to be defined in particular circumscribed ways.
    [Show full text]
  • New Labour, Old Morality
    New Labour, Old Morality. In The IdeasThat Shaped Post-War Britain (1996), David Marquand suggests that a useful way of mapping the „ebbs and flows in the struggle for moral and intellectual hegemony in post-war Britain‟ is to see them as a dialectic not between Left and Right, nor between individualism and collectivism, but between hedonism and moralism which cuts across party boundaries. As Jeffrey Weeks puts it in his contribution to Blairism and the War of Persuasion (2004): „Whatever its progressive pretensions, the Labour Party has rarely been in the vanguard of sexual reform throughout its hundred-year history. Since its formation at the beginning of the twentieth century the Labour Party has always been an uneasy amalgam of the progressive intelligentsia and a largely morally conservative working class, especially as represented through the trade union movement‟ (68-9). In The Future of Socialism (1956) Anthony Crosland wrote that: 'in the blood of the socialist there should always run a trace of the anarchist and the libertarian, and not to much of the prig or the prude‟. And in 1959 Roy Jenkins, in his book The Labour Case, argued that 'there is a need for the state to do less to restrict personal freedom'. And indeed when Jenkins became Home Secretary in 1965 he put in a train a series of reforms which damned him in they eyes of Labour and Tory traditionalists as one of the chief architects of the 'permissive society': the partial decriminalisation of homosexuality, reform of the abortion and obscenity laws, the abolition of theatre censorship, making it slightly easier to get divorced.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Counter-Bullying Reviewer Mr Mark Gosling, Assistant Head
    Policy Counter-Bullying Reviewer Mr Mark Gosling, Assistant Head Pastoral Reviewed 16 October 2020 Next review Autumn Term 2021 Changes Relevant SoJ Education documentation: Bullying Policy Victoria College is committed to the importance of safeguarding children as outlined by Children, Young People, Education and Skills (CYPES) “CYPES is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children and young people and requires all staff and volunteers to share this commitment” www.gov.je DEFINITION It can be difficult to appropriately categorise bullying behaviours. Consequently, we adopt the definition of the Anti-Bullying Alliance also supported by CYPEs, which states that: Bullying is a subjective experience and can take many forms. To be classed as a bullying act the perpetrator needs to have a social and premeditated awareness that the act is malicious and will cause physical and or emotional harm. Bullying therefore can be classed as any behaviour that is: • Emotional and physically harmful • Carried out by an individual or a group • Deliberate and wilful with a premeditated intent to harm • Occurs more than once • Involves a sustained imbalance of power, leaving the person being bullied feeling threatened and vulnerable. The above definition is outlined in the CYPEs Counter Bullying Policy which should also be used in conjunction with the: “Counter Bullying: Guidelines for Jersey Settings” which is a non-statutory document, offering examples of suitable programmes and approaches. Victoria College | Page 2 of 29 Please note that significant parts of the CYPEs “Counter Bullying Policy” and the “Counter Bullying Guidelines for Jersey Settings” have shaped and been integrated into this policy.
    [Show full text]
  • “Calouste Gulbenkian (1869S1955)
    The California State University, Fresno Armenian Studies Program and the Leon S. Peters Foundation present “CALOUSTE GULBENKIAN (1869-1955) AND THE ‘PASDURMA PROBLEM’” PRESENTED BY JONATHAN CONLIN, UNIV. OF SOUTHAMPTON Born into the Armenian merchant elite of Istanbul in 1869, the renowned oil magnate Calouste Gulbenkian made his fortune as a ‘business architect,’ persuading rival oil companies to collaborate for their mutual enrichment, particularly in the Middle East. The violent collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Armenian Genocide and the attempt to establish a secure “Armenian National Home” at Versailles barely affected Gulbenkian, who appeared uninterested in being a “good Armenian.” His fellow Armenians nonetheless looked to him as benefector and leader of their diaspora. He was thus appointed to the presidency of the Armenian General Benevolent Union. This talk will consider the biographer’s challenges in addressing what Gulbenkian’s daughter dubbed “the pasdurma problem”: the question of how to situate oneself as a family which showed little interest either in being “good Armenians” or in as- similation. It argues that Gulbenkian’s cosmopolitanism reflected the “amira” class from which he hailed as much as it did that supranational world of multi-national oil companies whose emergence Gulbenkian did so much to foster. Born in New York, Jonathan Conlin studied history and modern languages at Oxford before undertaking gradu- ate degrees at the Courtauld Institute and Cambridge, where he was subsequently appointed a Fellow of Sidney Sussex College. Since 2006 he has taught history at the University of Southampton. His books include a history of the National Gallery (London), a comparative history of Paris and London and a biography of Adam Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Your EAP|Here4tn! for You and Your Family
    OCT 2015 Your EAP|Here4TN! for you and your family Bullies come in all shapes, sizes and Be aware of—and act against—bullying ages. They wreak their interpersonal damage in many different settings. Upon a departmental reorganization, Angela found herself working for a new Bullies take advantage of what they boss. Angela had been with the organization for nearly 15 years and had a solid see as other people’s vulnerabilities or reputation. The director was relatively new, however, and seemed threatened by differences. In order to compensate Angela’s knowledge and status. Angela soon found herself singled out for harsh for their own deep insecurities, they criticism, micro-management, badgering and even insults by this director, who at use the tools of intimidation and one point said, “Things were good until you got here.” Angela was quite uncertain manipulation to bring others down. of how to resolve this situation. As National Bullying Prevention Month, October is a time to consider We now know more than ever about the devastating long-term effects that the destructive effects of bullying bullying can have on victims—whether the bullying happens at school, in the in social, educational and electronic workplace or online. communication settings. Those who Children, teens and adults can all be the victims of abusive behavior. Regardless are victims of abuse often need of their age, victims often suffer with long-lasting stress, anxiety, depression, and support to help them overcome their a range of uncomfortable physical symptoms. For children, bullying can lead isolation and assert their right to a safe to avoidance of school.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Memorializing: Analyzing Armenian Genocide Memorials and Commemorations in the Republic of Armenia and in the Diaspora
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR HISTORY, CULTURE AND MODERNITY www.history-culture-modernity.org Published by: Uopen Journals Copyright: © The Author(s). Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence eISSN: 2213-0624 The Cost of Memorializing: Analyzing Armenian Genocide Memorials and Commemorations in the Republic of Armenia and in the Diaspora Sabrina Papazian HCM 7: 55–86 DOI: 10.18352/hcm.534 Abstract In April of 1965 thousands of Armenians gathered in Yerevan and Los Angeles, demanding global recognition of and remembrance for the Armenian Genocide after fifty years of silence. Since then, over 200 memorials have been built around the world commemorating the vic- tims of the Genocide and have been the centre of hundreds of marches, vigils and commemorative events. This article analyzes the visual forms and semiotic natures of three Armenian Genocide memorials in Armenia, France and the United States and the commemoration prac- tices that surround them to compare and contrast how the Genocide is being memorialized in different Armenian communities. In doing so, this article questions the long-term effects commemorations have on an overall transnational Armenian community. Ultimately, it appears that calls for Armenian Genocide recognition unwittingly categorize the global Armenian community as eternal victims, impeding the develop- ment of both the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian diaspora. Keywords: Armenian Genocide, commemoration, cultural heritage, diaspora, identity, memorials HCM 2019, VOL. 7 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/202155 12:33:22PM via free access PAPAZIAN Introduction On 24 April 2015, the hundredth anniversary of the commencement of the Armenian Genocide, Armenians around the world collectively mourned for and remembered their ancestors who had lost their lives in the massacres and deportations of 1915.1 These commemorations took place in many forms, including marches, candlelight vigils, ceremo- nial speeches and cultural performances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Emotions, Moral Disengagement and Gender in Supporting Victims of Bullying
    education sciences Article The Role of Emotions, Moral Disengagement and Gender in Supporting Victims of Bullying Maria Carmen Cabrera 1, Elisa Larrañaga 2,* and Santiago Yubero 2 1 Área de Intervención Social, Ayuntamiento de Cuenca, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 16047 Cuenca, Spain; [email protected] 2 Department of Psychology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 16047 Cuenca, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 September 2020; Accepted: 30 November 2020; Published: 3 December 2020 Abstract: Previous research shows that classmates supporting victims’ defence is fundamental to combat bullying. To find a suitable response for the bullying problem, we must bear in mind how all the victim’s classmates respond and what variables can determine their helping behaviour. Moral disengagement has been demonstrated to be a factor that explains behaviour when faced with bullying. Emotions have also been shown to be relevant for bullying behaviour. This research aimed to gain knowledge of how adolescents behave when faced with bullying and to analyse how their behaviour relates to moral disengagement and both positive and negative emotions, specifically supportive behaviour for victims. In the present study 1029 students participated, all of whom came from Secondary Education, Training Cycles and Higher Secondary Education Stages in Spain. The regression analysis confirmed that being male increased the likelihood of performing active and passive behaviours. Conversely, being female involved displaying more proactive behaviours. Feeling positive/pleasant emotions about bullying increased active behaviour. Feeling negative/unpleasant emotions about bullying increased behaviour in the proactive behavior group. Adolescents should be aware that stopping bullying is their personal responsibility, which depends on their behaviour with the victim.
    [Show full text]