Case Studies in Nursing Ethics Fourth Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case Studies in Nursing Ethics Fourth Edition CASE STUDIES IN NURSING ETHICS FOURTH EDITION Sara T. Fry, PhD, RN Brewster, Massachusetts Robert M. Veatch, PhD Georgetown University Kennedy Institute of Ethics Washington, DC Carol Taylor, PhD, RN Georgetown University Center for Clinical Bioethics Washington, DC 80319_FMXx_ttlpg.indd 1 6/24/10 3:31 PM World Headquarters Jones & Bartlett Learning Jones & Bartlett Learning Jones & Bartlett Learning 40 Tall Pine Drive Canada International Sudbury, MA 01776 6339 Ormindale Way Barb House, Barb Mews 978-443-5000 Mississauga, Ontario L5V 1J2 London W6 7PA [email protected] Canada United Kingdom www.jblearning.com Jones & Bartlett Learning books and products are available through most bookstores and online booksellers. To contact Jones & Bartlett Learning directly, call 800-832-0034, fax 978-443-8000, or visit our website, www.jblearning.com. Substantial discounts on bulk quantities of Jones & Bartlett Learning publications are available to corporations, professional associations, and other qualified organizations. For details and specific discount information, contact the special sales department at Jones & Bartlett Learning via the above contact information or send an email to [email protected]. Copyright © 2011 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or utilized in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. The authors, editor, and publisher have made every effort to provide accurate information. However, they are not responsible for errors, omissions, or for any outcomes related to the use of the contents of this book and take no re- sponsibility for the use of the products and procedures described. Treatments and side effects described in this book may not be applicable to all people; likewise, some people may require a dose or experience a side effect that is not described herein. Drugs and medical devices are discussed that may have limited availability controlled by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use only in a research study or clinical trial. Research, clinical practice, and government regulations often change the accepted standard in this field. When consideration is being given to use of any drug in the clinical setting, the health care provider or reader is responsible for determining FDA status of the drug, reading the package insert, and reviewing prescribing information for the most up-to-date recommendations on dose, precautions, and contraindications, and determining the appropriate usage for the product. This is especially important in the case of drugs that are new or seldom used. Production Credits V.P., Manufacturing and Inventory Control: Publisher: Kevin Sullivan Therese Connell Acquisitions Editor: Amy Sibley Composition: DataStream Content Solutions, Associate Editor: Patricia Donnelly LLC, Absolute Service Inc. Editorial Assistant: Rachel Shuster Cover Design: Scott Moden Associate Production Editor: Katie Spiegel Printing and Binding: Malloy, Inc. Associate Marketing Manager: Katie Hennessy Cover Printing: Malloy, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Fry, Sara T. Case studies in nursing ethics / Sara T. Fry, Robert M. Veatch, Carol R. Taylor. — 4th ed. â p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7637-8031-9 (pbk.) 1. Nursing ethics—Case studies. I. Veatch, Robert M. II. Taylor, Carol, CSFN. III. Title. [DNLM: 1. Ethics, Nursing—Case Reports. 2. Bioethical Issues—Case Reports. WY 85 F947c 2011] RT85.V4 2011 174.2—dc22 2010017881 6048 Printed in the United States of America 14 13 12 11 10 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents List of Casesâ ix Prefaceâ xiii Introductionâ xv Part Iâ Ethics and Values in Nursing Chapter 1 Values in Health and Illnessâ 3 Identifying Evaluations in Nursingâ 4 Identifying Ethical Conflictsâ 15 Benefit to the Patient vs Benefit to Othersâ 15 The Rights of the Patient vs the Welfare of the Patientâ 19 Moral Rules and the Nurse’s Conscienceâ 23 Limits on Rights and Rulesâ 27 Chapter 2 The Nurse and Moral Authorityâ 35 The Authority of the Professionâ 37 The Authority of the Physicianâ 42 The Authority of the Institutionâ 46 The Authority of the Health Insurerâ 50 The Authority of Societyâ 52 The Authority of the Patientâ 56 iii iv Contents Chapter 3 Moral Integrity and Moral Distressâ 61 Why Does Moral Agency Matter?â 63 Moral Distressâ 63 Creating and Sustaining Healthy and Ethical Work Environmentsâ 66 Ethics Environment Assessmentsâ 67 Resources for Establishing and Sustaining Healthy Environmentsâ 67 Change Theory Modelsâ 68 Part IIâ Ethical Issues in Nursing Chapter 4 Benefiting the Patient and Others: The Duty to Produce Good and Avoid Harmâ 79 Benefit to the Patientâ 82 Uncertainty About What Is Actually Beneficial to a Patientâ 83 Health Benefits vs Overall Benefitsâ 85 Benefiting vs Avoiding Harmâ 89 Act vs Rule Consequentialismâ 91 Benefit to the Institutionâ 94 Benefit to Societyâ 97 Benefit to Identified Nonclientsâ 99 Benefit to the Professionâ 102 Benefit to Oneself and One’s Familyâ 105 Chapter 5 Justice: The Allocation of Health Resourcesâ 109 The Ethics of Allocating Resourcesâ 111 Two Meanings of the Word Justiceâ 111 Three Ways to Allocate Resourcesâ 111 Justice Among the Nurse’s Patientsâ 114 Justice Between Patients and Othersâ 122 Justice in Public Policyâ 126 Justice and Other Ethical Principlesâ 131 Contents v Chapter 6 Respectâ 136 Ignoring a Person as a Person and Focusing Only on the Pathology or “Task” to Be Performedâ 139 Arrogant Decision Makingâ 141 Humiliating Othersâ 144 Chapter 7 The Principle of Autonomyâ 149 Internal Constraints on Autonomyâ 152 External Constraints on Autonomyâ 159 Overriding Autonomyâ 164 Paternalistic Overriding of Autonomyâ 164 Overriding Autonomy to Benefit Othersâ 169 Chapter 8 Veracityâ 174 The Condition of Doubtâ 176 Duties and Consequences in Truth Tellingâ 179 Lying and Patient Well-Beingâ 179 Lying and the Well-Being of Othersâ 184 Complications in Truth Tellingâ 187 When the Patient Asks for Dishonestyâ 187 When the Family Asks Not to Tellâ 188 The Right to Health Recordsâ 192 Chapter 9 Fidelityâ 196 Promise Keepingâ 197 Explicit Promisesâ 198 Implicit Promises and the Right of Access to Health Careâ 201 Confidentialityâ 203 When the Patient May Be Harmedâ 209 When Others May Be Harmedâ 215 When Required by Lawâ 220 vi Contents Chapter 10 The Sanctity of Human Lifeâ 223 Actions and Omissionsâ 225 Criteria for Justifiable Omissionâ 229 Withholding and Withdrawingâ 233 Direct and Indirect Killingâ 238 Voluntary and Involuntary Killingâ 243 Is Withholding Food and Water Killing?â 247 Part IIIâSpecial Problem Areas in Nursing Practice Chapter 11 Abortion, Contraception, and Sterilizationâ 259 Abortionâ 260 Contraceptionâ 270 Sterilizationâ 274 Chapter 12 Genetics, Birth, and the Biologic Revolutionâ 278 Genetic Counselingâ 280 Genetic Screeningâ 289 In Vitro Fertilization and Artificial Inseminationâ 294 Genetic Engineeringâ 306 Chapter 13 Psychiatry and the Control of Human Behaviorâ 313 Psychotherapyâ 317 The Concept of Mental Healthâ 317 Mental Illness and Autonomous Behaviorâ 320 Mental Illness and Third-Party Interestsâ 324 Other Behavior-Controlling Therapiesâ 329 Contents vii Chapter 14 HIV/AIDS Careâ 333 Conflicts Between Rights and Dutiesâ 335 Screening/Testing for HIVâ 335 Balancing Confidentiality Protection and the Duty to Warnâ 339 The Rights of HIV-Infected Individualsâ 345 Conflicts Involving the Cost of Treatment and Allocation of Resourcesâ 349 Research on HIVâ 357 Chapter 15 Experimentation on Human Beingsâ 364 Calculating Risks and Benefitsâ 370 Protecting Privacyâ 377 Equity in Researchâ 380 Informed Consent in Researchâ 383 Chapter 16 Consent and the Right to Refuse Treatmentâ 396 The Right to Refuse Treatmentâ 401 The Elements and Standards of Disclosureâ 405 Comprehension and Voluntarinessâ 413 Consent for Patients Who Lack Decision Capacityâ 418 Chapter 17 Death and Dyingâ 426 The Definition of Deathâ 429 Competent and Formerly Competent Patientsâ 433 Treating Against the Wishes of the Patientâ 433 The Patient in Conflict with the Physician and the Familyâ 436 The Problem of the Ambivalent Patientâ 438 Never-Competent Patients and Those Who Have Never Expressed Their Wishesâ 441 How Much Discretion Should Family Have?â 443 Nonfamily Surrogatesâ 448 Divisions Within the Familyâ 451 Futile Careâ 458 Limits Based on the Interests of Other Partiesâ 464 viii Contents Appendixâ 473 Glossaryâ 479 Indexâ 487 List of Cases Case 1-1: The Patient Who Needed Help Getting Out of Bed 4 Case 1-2: The Nurse–Midwife and Crisis in a Home Delivery 9 Case 1-3: The Nurse and Cost Containment: The Duty to Society 16 Case 1-4: When Promoting the Patient’s Well-Being Infringes on Basic Human Rights 19 Case 1-5: The Nurse Asked to Assist in an Abortion 24 Case 1-6: The Visiting Nurse and the Obstinate Patient: Limits on the Right to Nursing Care 28 Case 2-1: The Nurse Who Thought the ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses Was Wrong 37 Case 2-2: Following the Physician’s Orders: The Nurse as Moral Spectator 43 Case 2-3: The Nurse Covering the Maternity Unit 47 Case 2-4: When Health Insurers Put Newborns at Risk 50 Case 2-5: Medications by Unlicensed Technicians 52 Case 2-6: The Patient Who Refused to Be Tested for a Genetic Disease 57 Case 3-1: The Nurse Expected to Go Along with the Doctor’s Deception 65 Case 3-2: Nurses Caught Between a Rock and a
Recommended publications
  • Neuro-Advancements and the Role of Nurses As Stated in Academic Literature and Canadian Newspapers
    societies Article Neuro-Advancements and the Role of Nurses as Stated in Academic Literature and Canadian Newspapers Rochelle Deloria 1 and Gregor Wolbring 2,* 1 Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N1, Canada 2 Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4N1, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 April 2019; Accepted: 22 August 2019; Published: 26 August 2019 Abstract: Neurosciences and neurotechnologies (from now on called neuro-advancements) constantly evolve and influence all facets of society. Neuroethics and neuro-governance discourses focus on the impact of neuro-advancements on individuals and society, and stakeholder involvement is identified as an important aspect of being able to deal with such an impact. Nurses engage with neuro-advancements within their occupation, including neuro-linked assistive technologies, such as brain-computer interfaces, cochlear implants, and virtual reality. The role of nurses is multifaceted and includes being providers of clinical and other health services, educators, advocates for their field and their clients, including disabled people, researchers, and influencers of policy discourses. Nurses have a stake in how neuro-advancements are governed, therefore, being influencers of neuroethics and neuro-governance discourses should be one of these roles. Lifelong learning and professional development could be one mechanism to increase the knowledge of nurses about ethical, social, and legal issues linked to neuro-advancements, which in turn, would allow nurses to provide meaningful input towards neuro-advancement discussions. Disabled people are often the recipients of neuro-advancements and are clients of nurses, therefore, they have a stake in the way nurses interact with neuro-advancements and influence the sociotechnical context of neuro-advancements, which include neuro-linked assistive devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Nontherapeutic Growth Attenuation, Parental Medical Decision Making, and the Profoundly Developmentally Disabled Child’S Right to Bodily Integrity
    KOLL.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 12/17/2009 2:48 PM GROWTH, INTERRUPTED: NONTHERAPEUTIC GROWTH ATTENUATION, PARENTAL MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, AND THE PROFOUNDLY DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILD’S RIGHT TO BODILY INTEGRITY MARY KOLL* Should parents of a profoundly developmentally disabled child be permitted to permanently terminate their child’s healthy bodily de- velopment in order to arguably increase the child’s quality of life? While such a procedure may sound like something out of science fic- tion, a highly publicized medical journal article released in 2006 de- scribed the case of Ashley X, a profoundly developmentally disabled child who received high-dose hormone treatment—along with a mas- tectomy and a hysterectomy—to permanently stunt her growth and al- legedly increase her quality of life. Though the authors of the article presented this type of nontherapeutic growth attenuation as a viable medical option for profoundly disabled children, critics from all over the world characterized the procedure—which came to be known as the “Ashley Treatment”—as a grave and unacceptable human rights violation. Nonetheless, the Ashley Treatment has also been met with support from some, most notably the parents of profoundly disabled children, many of whom have expressed a desire for their own child- ren to undergo similar procedures. This Note explores the question of whether parents should be permitted to choose such interventions on behalf of a child from the perspective of the child’s rights, specifi- cally, the child’s fundamental right to bodily integrity. Following a brief description of the case of Ashley X and the ensuing controversy, the author describes the right to bodily integrity, including its origins, its modern constitutional status, and its application to profoundly dis- abled children.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Statement
    PERSONAL ASSISTANTS AND COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING: PROMOTING A BETTER BALANCE OF AUTONOMY AND WELL-BEING FOR ADULTS WITH MODERATE, MILD, AND BORDERLINE MENTAL RETARDATION by Sarah M. Pope B.S., University of New Hampshire, 2000 J.D., University of Pittsburgh, 2007 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Center for Bioethics and Health Law in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Pittsburgh 2007 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE CENTER FOR BIOETHICS AND HEALTH LAW This thesis was presented by Sarah M. Pope It was defended on April 13, 2007 and approved by Elizabeth Chaitin, DHCE, Center for Bioethics and Health Law James Flannery, JD, School of Law Thesis Advisor: Alan Meisel, JD, Center for Bioethics and Health Law, School of Law ii Copyright © by Sarah M. Pope 2007 iii PERSONAL ASSISTANTS AND COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING: PROMOTING A BETTER BALANCE OF AUTONOMY AND WELL-BEING FOR ADULTS WITH MODERATE, MILD, AND BORDERLINE MENTAL RETARDATION Sarah M. Pope, J.D., M.A. University of Pittsburgh, 2007 Autonomy is a core value of American tradition and is promoted in health care through the doctrine of informed consent. The notion underlying informed consent is that patients should have the right to decide, and are often in the best position to know, what will enhance their own well-being. Although this ethic has been extended to incompetent patients, by employing surrogate decision making, providing surrogate decision makers for adults with moderate, mild, and borderline mental retardation (“M-BMR”), who could potentially make their own decisions if adequate supports were offered, unreasonably restricts the autonomy of such individuals and often results in disregard for the patients’ human dignity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Case of Ashley X
    Forever Small: The Strange Case of Ashley X EVA FEDER KITTAY I explore the ethics of altering the body of a child with severe cognitive disabilities in such a way that keeps the child ‘‘forever small.’’ The parents of Ashley, a girl of six with severe cognitive and developmental disabilities, in collaboration with her physi- cians and the Hospital Ethics Committee, chose to administer growth hormones that would inhibit her growth. They also decided to remove her uterus and breast buds, assuring that she would not go through the discomfort of menstruation and would not grow breasts. In this way she would stay ‘‘forever small’’ and be able to be carried and handled by family members. They claimed that doing this would ensure that she would be able to be part of the family and of family activities and to have familial care. But the procedure has raised thorny ethical questions. I wish to explore these questions philosophically by bringing to bear my own experiences as a mother of a grown daugh- ter with severe cognitive impairments. PRELUDE THE CASE In 2002, the parents of a six-year-old girl with a condition that will require physical care throughout her life, and who had begun to exhibit signs of pre- cocious puberty, requested, and were granted, permission to have high doses of estrogen administered to induce the premature closing of the long-bone epiphyses, thus maintaining the girl’s height at 4’5’’. The intention was to facilitate her care by keeping her small. To reduce the uterine bleeding that accompanies the procedure, as well as the risk of uterine cancer, she underwent a hysterectomy prior to the estrogen treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements
    Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements 1 Public review draft for reading* Note: To submit comments about this draft, please use the per-Provision files and cite the line numbers to which you are referring. The Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements Silver Spring, Maryland 2014 * For public review and comment May 6 through June 6, 2014. Not for attribution or distribution © 2014 American Nurses Association Note: To submit comments about this draft, please use the per-Provision files and cite the line numbers to which you are referring. Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements 2 Public review draft for reading* Note: To submit comments about this draft, please use the per-Provision files and cite the line numbers to which you are referring. Contents The Code of Ethics for Nurses Preface Provision 1 1.1 Respect for human dignity 1.2 Relationships to patients 1.3 The nature of health 1.4 The right to self-determination 1.5 Relationships with colleagues and others Provision 2 2.1 Primacy of the patient's interests 2.2 Conflict of interest for nurses 2.3 Collaboration 2.4 Professional boundaries Provision 3 3.1 Protection of the rights of privacy and confidentiality 3.2 Protection of human participants in research 3.3 Performance standards and review mechanisms 3.4 Professional competence in nursing practice 3.5 Protecting patient health and safety by action on questionable practice 3.6 Patient protection and impaired practice * For public review and comment May 6 through June 6, 2014. Not for attribution or distribution © 2014 American Nurses Association Note: To submit comments about this draft, please use the per-Provision files and cite the line numbers to which you are referring.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Ethics in Pluralistic Healthcare Contexts
    RELIGION AND ETHICS IN PLURALISTIC HEALTHCARE CONTEXTS May 10 –12, 2012 Trinity Western University Langley, BC Faith & Nursing Symposium trinity western university, langley, bc, may 10-12th, 2012 Program Overview day 1 – thursday, may 10th, 2012 7-9 pm Registration and Conference Opening Reception day 2 – friday, may 11th, 2012 8 am Registration (Coffee, Breakfast) 8:30 am Welcome and Conference Opening 8:45 am plenary session Beth Johnston Taylor “What Does Spirituality Mean to Nursing?” 9:45 am Poster Overviews 10:15 am Morning Coffee 10:45 am concurrent sessions 1 12:45 pm Lunch 1:45 pm plenary session Marsha Fowler “Religious Ethics: What Are the Imperatives and the Risks?” 2:45 pm Panel of Book Authors (Moderator: Jan Storch) 4 pm Book Signing and Reception 5:30 pm BBQ Dinner 7 pm public panel Jas Cheema, Janice Clarke, Rani Srivastava, Evelyn Voyageur “A Multi-Faith Dialogue on Diversity and Health Care Services” day 3 – saturday, may 12th, 2012 The conference committee is grateful for the 8 am Registration (Coffee, Breakfast) support of the conference from the Priscilla 8:30 am plenary session Sonya Grypma and Stranford Reid Trust Foundation “Angels of Mercy? Religion, History and Nursing Identity” 9:15 am concurrent sessions 2 and the twu Internal Grants program. 10:15 am Morning Coffee 10:45 am concurrent sessions 3 12:15 am Lunch 1:15 pm plenary session Donal O’Mathuna “A Christian Perspective on Health Care Ethics in Pluralistic Societies” 2 pm Afternoon Tea 2:30 pm workshop “Nursing at the Borderlands of Religious and Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • The Ashley Treatment: the Current Legal Framework Protects the Wrong Rights
    Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology Volume 10 Issue 2 Article 12 2009 The Ashley Treatment: The Current Legal Framework Protects the Wrong Rights Jillian Kornblatt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst Recommended Citation Jillian Kornblatt, The Ashley Treatment: The Current Legal Framework Protects the Wrong Rights, 10 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 773 (2009). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol10/iss2/12 The Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. KORNBLATT J. The Ashley Treatment: The Current Legal Framework Protects the Wrong Rights. MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 2009;10(2): 773-800. Note The Ashley Treatment: The Current Legal Framework Protects the Wrong Rights Jillian Kornblatt* In 2006 two Seattle doctors performed several procedures to attenuate the growth of a profoundly neurologically and cognitively disabled six-year-old girl. When the doctors described the treatment in a medical journal, the story gained worldwide publicity and quickly became the subject of a highly contentious and emotionally charged controversy. As a result, a federally-sanctioned disability rights protection organization conducted an investigation and concluded that the treatment should not have been performed without a court order and that doing so violated the girl’s constitutional rights. Part I of this Note considers the legal framework applied to the treatment decision and how the framework would apply to other children whose parents requested the treatment. Part II then analyzes whether this framework adequately protects the best interests and constitutional rights of potential candidates for this treatment and their parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Love; a Relevant Concept in Nursing and Caring Science Charles Emakpor and Maj–Helen Nyback
    Love; A Relevant Concept in Nursing and Caring Science Charles Emakpor and Maj–Helen Nyback Series A: Articles, 2/2010 www.novia.fi/english Love; A Relevant Concept in Nursing and Caring Science Novia Publications and Productions, series A: Articles, 2/2010 Publisher: Novia University of Applied Sciences, Tehtaankatu 1, Vaasa, Finland © 2010 Charles Emakpor, Maj–Helen Nyback, and Novia University of Applied Sciences Layout: Michael Diedrichs Love; A Relevant Concept in Nursing and Caring Science / Charles Emakpor, Maj–Helen Nyback. – Vaasa: Novia University of Applied Sciences, 2010. Novia Publications and Productions, series A: Articles, 2/2010. 2 ISSN: 1799-4187 (Online) ISBN (digital): 978-952-5839-10-4 Love; A Relevant Concept in Nursing and Caring Science Charles Emakpor and Maj–Helen Nyback 3 Content Abstract 5 Caring science 5 Love 6 Agape 7 Eros 8 Discussion 9 Reference list 11 4 LOVE; A RELEVANT CONCEPT IN NURSING AND CARING SCIENCE Abstract Love is for the world what the sun is for the exterior life (Steiner, 1978) and it adds beauty, joy and satisfaction to the practice of nursing and also to the caring process. One reason for suffering is the lack of care, and the motive for caring is, according to Eriksson (2001), love. The lack of love can be a reason for the lack of care, which motivates the study of the concept “love” in caring science. The aim of this article is to describe and discuss the concept of love and the way it is related to nursing and caring science. Caring science Caring is essential for human survival and development (Gaylin, 1976, 17) and it manifests the human mode of being (Roach, 1997, 14).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Women with Disabilities and Legal Issues
    TASC is sponsored by the Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD), the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA), the Social Security Administration (SSA), and the Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA). TASC is a division of the National Disability Rights Network (NDRN). Fact Sheet: Women with Disabilities and Legal Issues Concerning Reproductive Health August, 2011 Prepared by: National Health Law Program Jina Dhillon and Celine Lefebvre1 with a grant from the Training and Advocacy Support Center (TASC) Introduction This fact sheet describes significant reproductive health-related legal issues that women with disabilities may face. Women with disabilities are particularly susceptible to discriminatory standards of care, coercion and misinformation about their reproductive autonomy. Courts have issued decisions involving the capacity to consent to sterilization, abortion and similar procedures, or the ability of a guardian to make reproductive health determinations in the best interests of the individual. This fact sheet provides an overview of case law in this area as well as a brief discussion of other issues identified by legal scholars as important areas for advocacy. Reproductive Health Issues Sterilization People with mental and physical disabilities have often been subjected to forced sterilization. The notion that these women and men are unable to make meaningful decisions about their reproductive capacity often leads caretakers, guardians, and the courts to consider sterilization as the best option for them. Case law regarding sterilization stems from the United States Supreme Court’s 1927 decision in Buck v. Bell, in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Virginia statute that instituted compulsory sterilization of individuals with mental disabilities.2 Since then, many cases have addressed the issue of sterilization of women with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of the Societal Impact of Neuroethics in Scientific and General Communities
    Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Projects Spring 5-1-2015 An Exploration of the Societal Impact of Neuroethics in Scientific and General Communities Katelyn Marie Edel Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Other Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons Recommended Citation Edel, Katelyn Marie, "An Exploration of the Societal Impact of Neuroethics in Scientific and General Communities" (2015). Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects. 847. https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/847 This Honors Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Exploration of the Societal Impact of Neuroethics in Scientific and General Communities A Capstone Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Renée Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University Katelyn Marie Edel Candidate for Bachelor of Arts and Renée Crown University Honors May 2015 Honors Capstone Project in Neuroscience Capstone Project Advisor: ___________________________ William Peace, Professor in the Renée Crown University Honors Program Capstone Project Reader: ____________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Code Gray.Pub
    Written by Christine Mitchell, RN, FAAN and Ben Achtenberg with a historical commentary by Susan Reverby, PhD and assistance from Joan Sawyer and Karen Wolf, RN, MS Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 3 Background ............................................................................................3 Synopsis of the Film ..............................................................................3 Suggested Uses .......................................................................................4 Scheduling ..............................................................................................4 FILM AS A TOOL FOR DISCUSSION .......................................................4 WHAT IS NURSING ETHICS? ...................................................................5 GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................5 SOME GENERAL DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ........................................6 CASE 1: BENEFICENCE ............................................................................7 Description of the Case .........................................................................7 The Principle: Beneficence ...................................................................7 Questions for Discussion ......................................................................8 CASE 2: AUTONOMY ................................................................................9 Description
    [Show full text]
  • MARN Fall Clinical Conference Highlights
    MAMAssachusettsssachusetts RReporteport onon NNursingursing MARN is the Massachusetts Affi liate to the American Nurses Association Vol. 6 No. 4 The Offi cial Publication of the Massachusetts Association of Registered Nurses, Inc. December 2008 PO Box 285 • Milton, MA 02186 • 617-990-2856 • [email protected] Quarterly Circulation 111,000 MARN Mourns the Passing of Nurse Leader Marie E. Snyder Some final thoughts on It is with deep sadness and loss that we share with you that Marie E. Snyder, Homelessness nurse attorney and nursing leader in Massachusetts died on Friday November 21, 2008 in Harwich, MA. Pages 6, 7 MARN will honor Marie's many contributions to the nursing profession in a memorial article in our March Issue of the MAssachusetts Report on Nursing. Requiescat in pace. 2009 Living Legends and Excellence in Nursing 8th Annual Spring Awards Dinner Convention Friday, April 3. 2009 ~ 6:00 pm-9:30 pm The Ethics Imperative in Nursing Saturday, April 4, 2009 Join MARN as we celebrate 7:30 am–8:30 am the 2009 BEST in Nursing in Continental Breakfast, Massachusetts as well as MARN’s Exhibits and Registration 8th Annual Spring Convention successes for the past 8 years! 8:30 am–9:30 am Living Legends and Excellence in Cocktail Reception The Evolution of Moral Responsibility in Nursing Awards Dinner 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm Clinical Practice Christine Mitchell, RN, MS, MTS, FAAN Friday, April 3, 2009 Dinner and Awards Ceremony 6:00 pm-9:30 pm 9:30 am–10:00 am 7:00 pm – 9:30 pm Break, Exhibits, and Raffle The Ethics Imperative in Nursing Saturday, April 4, 2009 2009 Living Legends in 10:00 am–11:15 am 7:30 am-2:45 pm Massachusetts Nursing Listening for the Gray: Shared Reflections on Ethics Narratives 2009 President’s Award Panel Presentation Featuring Keynote Speaker Excellence in Nursing Awards 11:30 am–12:30 pm Christine Mitchell MARN Business Meeting RN, MS, MTS, FAAN Ruth Lang Fitzgerald Associate Director, Memorial Scholarship 11:30 am–12:30 pm MASNA Student Forum Clinical Ethics, Harvard Arthur L.
    [Show full text]