Spring 2014 | Volume 35 | Issue 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spring 2014 | Volume 35 | Issue 1 The Nobel lecture Cluster Munitions Act South Sudan Saudi arms deal Working for a world free Bill-C6 awaits third Shattered peace leaves Export win raises questions of chemical weapons reading in Commons more than 10,000 dead on human rights The Ploughshares Monitor SPRING 2014 | VOLUME 35 | ISSUE 1 Viewing nuclear weapons through a humanitarian lens by Cesar Jaramillo A quarterly publication of Project Ploughshares • Available online: www.ploughshares.ca Contents The Ploughshares Monitor Volume 35 | Issue 1 PROJECT PLOUGHSHARES STAFF Spring 2014 John Siebert Executive Director Kenneth Epps Cesar Jaramillo Debbie Hughes Matthew Pupic Charmila Ireland Wendy Stocker The Nobel Peace Prize lecture Tasneem Jamal Barbara Wagner The 2013 prize went to the Organisation for the Prohibition The Ploughshares Monitor is the quarterly journal of Project Ploughshares, the peace 3 of Chemical Weapons. centre of The Canadian Council of Churches. Ploughshares works with churches, by Ahmet Üzümcü nongovernmental organizations, and governments, in Canada and abroad, to advance policies and actions that prevent war and armed violence and build peace. Project Ploughshares is affiliated with Problems with Bill C-6 the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, An Act to Implement the Convention on Cluster Munitions Conrad Grebel University College, University 6 awaits third reading in the House of Commons. of Waterloo. by Project Ploughshares staff Office address: Project Ploughshares 57 Erb Street West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2 Canada 519-888-6541, fax: 519-888-0018 South Sudan at odds with itself [email protected]; www.ploughshares.ca A shattering of the peace has led to more than 10,000 deaths. 10 Project Ploughshares gratefully acknowledges by John Siebert the ongoing financial support of the many individuals, national churches and church agencies, local congregations, religious orders, and organizations across Canada that ensure that the work of Project Ploughshares continues. Is a nuclear weapons ban in sight? cover story Recognition is growing that the possession and use of nuclear We are particularly grateful 12 weapons is inconsistent with International Humanitarian Law. to The Simons Foundation in Vancouver by Cesar Jaramillo for its generous support. All donors of $50 or more receive a complimentary subscription to The Ploughshares Monitor. Annual Hope for Liberia subscription rates for libraries and institutions Trauma healing and reconciliation in the war-torn country. are: $30 in Canada; $30 (U.S.) in the United 16 States; $35 (U.S.) internationally. Single copies by Aloysius B. Nyanti are $5 plus shipping. Unless indicated otherwise, material may be reproduced freely, provided the author and source are indicated and one copy is sent Arms export win is human rights loss to Project Ploughshares. Return postage 20 Deal with Saudi Arabia raises human rights concerns. is guaranteed. by Kenneth Epps Publications Mail Registration No. 40065122. ISSN 1499-321X. The Ploughshares Monitor is indexed in the Canadian Periodical Index. Books etc. Photos of staff by Karl Griffiths-Fulton 23 A debut novel by Ploughshares staffer Tasneem Jamal. Printed at Waterloo Printing, Waterloo, Ontario. Printed with vegetable inks on paper with recycled content. We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Periodical Fund of the Department of Canadian Heritage. COVER: This iconic photograph, first published in Life magazine, shows a mother and child in Hiroshima in 1945. Getty Images Nobel Peace Prize lecture 2013 Working together for a world free of chemical weapons, and beyond By Ahmet Üzümcü or sixteen years now, the ity. But chemical weapons have, by of 1899. OPCW [Organisation for any measure, an especially nefarious The fact that this treaty was not F the Prohibition of Chemical legacy. observed during the First World Weapons] has been overseeing the Almost one hundred years since War prompted immediate efforts to elimination of an entire category of their first large-scale use on the negotiate a stronger norm. These weapons of mass destruction. Our battlefields of Flanders, it is worth efforts resulted in the 1925 Geneva task is to consign chemical weapons reminding ourselves of the reasons Protocol. While it prohibited the use to history, forever—a task we have why these weapons invoke such hor- of chemical weapons, the Protocol been carrying out with quiet deter- ror, right up to our own time. Chemi- did not ban their production or pos- mination, and no small measure of cal weapons stir the deep-rooted and session. success. pathological fear all humans share of History, alas, did not bear out its Under the terms of the Chemical being poisoned. They do not discrim- robustness. Chemical weapons con- Weapons Convention, the OPCW inate between combatant and civilian, tinued to be used across the globe, has so far verified the destruction nor between battlefield and village. including against civilian populations. of more than 80% of all declared You cannot see them. You cannot And, alarmingly, large and more so- chemical weapons. We have also im- smell them. And they offer no warn- phisticated arsenals were developed plemented a wide range of measures ing for the unsuspecting. during the Cold War. It was not until to prevent such weapons from re- But their effects are devastating— the 1980s that negotiations for a emerging. And with 190 states now burning, blinding or suffocating their more comprehensive chemical weap- members of this global ban, we are victims. Death is rarely instant and ons treaty got under way in earnest. hastening the vision of a world free never painless. And when they fail to Chemical attacks being perpetrated of chemical weapons to reality. kill, as they often do, these weapons at that time by the former regime inflict lasting damage on people and in Iraq added to the urgency of this ********** their environment, denying them the process. opportunity to repair and rebuild in Fortunately, it was not only the There can be no doubt about the the wake of conflict. brutal effects of chemical weapons value of this work. For chemical that focused minds. What drove the weapons have been used with brutal ********** negotiators was also the imperative to regularity over the twentieth cen- ensure the effectiveness of the future tury—and, tragically, in our own cen- The first attempt to ban the use of norm to ban these weapons. tury as well. No weapon, of course, chemical weapons under interna- States were adamant that chemical has a monopoly on cruelty or lethal- tional law was the Hague Convention weapons had to be made a thing of The Ploughshares Monitor | Spring 2014 3 NOBEL LECTURE It is high time to move towards a different, more durable security in keeping with the extraordinary opportunities that globalisation has brought—a security that accommodates human development, economic cooperation and mutual prosperity. the past—by deeds, not just words. of the Chemical Weapons Conven- such compressed timeframes. But, as What they strove for was a treaty that tion. much as this mission is testing our all but enforced compliance, coming With the entry into force of the capacities and resources, our progress closer than any predecessor to guar- Convention in 1997, we have thus so far has only strengthened our con- anteeing adherence to its provisions. been able to cross, and link, the wide fidence that we can succeed. And, after almost two decades of dif- space in disarmament between pas- ficult negotiations, they succeeded. sion and practicality, between senti- ********** Their efforts gave birth to the full ment and action, between noble global ban that came to be known ambition and concrete achievements. International consensus on the elimi- as the Chemical Weapons Conven- And, for the first time in the history nation of chemical weapons in Syria tion—and to an entirely independent of multilateral diplomacy, we were has as its basis the same consensus organisation, the OPCW, to oversee able to show that consensus-based that drove the Chemical Weapons its implementation. decision-making can yield practical, Convention to conclusion. The chal- effective and, above all, verifiable re- lenge now is to persuade those six ********** sults in disarmament. countries1 still outside the Conven- tion to join it—without delay or con- It was out of these negotiations that ********** ditions. the crucible of the unique success There has long been no reasonable of the Chemical Weapons Conven- The Convention’s achievements make defence for not doing so—all the tion was forged—a comprehensive the recent chemical attacks in Syria, more now in the wake of the robust international verification mechanism. which shocked us all, even more international reaction to recent use A mechanism that had no prior tragic. For they highlight the manifest of chemical weapons. No national model and had to be developed from security advantages that states adher- interest can credibly outweigh either scratch. A mechanism that obliges ing to the Convention enjoy. In the the security or economic benefits of every one of the Convention’s 190 sixteen years that the Convention has adhering to the global chemical ban. Member States, without discrimina- been in force, no Member State has It is my fervent hope that this tion, to destroy its chemical weapon experienced an attack with chemical award will spur on efforts to make stocks and production facilities—and weapons. the Chemical Weapons Convention to lay bare, through inspection, any Thankfully, the international re- a truly universal norm. Universal ad- industrial facilities that could be used sponse to those attacks set in motion herence to the Convention would be for purposes prohibited by this treaty. an extraordinary series of events. the most enduring investment in its A mechanism that brooks no excep- These resulted in Syria’s accession integrity—and the best guarantee of tions, and can conduct inspections to the Convention and a front-line its reach.
Recommended publications
  • Vice Chancellor Professor Saiful Islam, Professor Chaudry
    ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS “The Chemical Weapons Convention: Science in Service of Peace” Speech to Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Ahmet Üzümcü, Director-General OPCW Dhaka, Bangladesh 17 October 2016 SPEECH AS DELIVERED Vice- Vice Chancellor Professor Saiful Islam, Professor Chaudry, Distinguished faculty members, Dear students, Ladies and gentlemen, This is my first official visit to Bangladesh as Director-General of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, or OPCW. I consider it particularly important to visit centres of learning and to interact with those associated with such institutions. These are the places where ideas germinate and where the thought process is disciplined to make creative energies productive. The content and direction of progress in a country is largely determined by the quality of its educational institutions. Your university is renowned not only as one of the oldest and largest centres of higher learning in Bangladesh. It is noted for its high quality research and academic programmes in technology and engineering. It, therefore, gives me great pleasure to be with you here today. Later this week, Bangladesh will mark forty-five years of its independence. Over this time, your country has taken significant strides in advancing progress for its people. Bangladesh also has a worthy record as a responsible global citizen. It is one of the largest contributors to the United Nations peacekeeping operations. By subscribing to all major disarmament treaties, Bangladesh participates in the endeavour to make our world a place safe from weapons of mass destruction. Your country is an original signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), a landmark international treaty that bans an entire class of weapons of mass destruction under international verification.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference on Disarmament Statement by Ambassador
    ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS Please check against delivery CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT STATEMENT BY AMBASSADOR AHMET ÜZÜMCÜ DIRECTOR-GENERAL ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS GENEVA 5 September 2017 Mr. President, Mr Secretary General, Please accept my felicitations on your assumption of the Presidency of the Conference on Disarmament. The Conference is assured of able leadership as you bring to this position a wealth of knowledge, experience and diplomatic skills. I wish you every success. I am delighted and indeed honoured to address the CD. This forum embodies the spirit of an era of resolve to banish war in favour of peace – peace based on a durable foundation of international cooperation, development and the rejection of the tools of war that are regarded as illegitimate. The twentieth century witnessed the trauma of two world wars within a span of a few decades that brought ruin on a scale never seen before in human history. Technology magnified the destructive power of weapons in ways not thought possible. These harrowing experiences united the entire world community in an aspiration to live together in harmony. A community of nations traumatised by extreme and pervasive violence found it possible to reignite the lost glow and warmth of shared values and norms as a basis for inter-state relations. Ironically, just as people were constructing a new beginning, the nuclear age was dawning. The destruction seen as a result of years of warfare could now happen in a matter of minutes. A well-thought out and systematic pursuit of disarmament eventually took shape of which the CD is a salient manifestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Line Redux: How Putin Tore up Obama's 2013 Syria Deal
    REPORT WORLD Red Line Redux: How Putin Tore Up Obama’s 2013 Syria Deal FEBRUARY 3, 2017 — ARON LUND PAGE 1 The so-called “red line” episode in September 2013, when, in a last-minute decision,P resident Barack Obama called off U.S. air strikes in Syria,1 has continued to shape his legacy. Instead of striking the Syrian government in retaliation for a nerve gas attack near Damascus, Obama took Russian President Vladimir Putin up on an offer to peacefully dismantle the Syrian chemical weapons program and craft a United Nations resolution2 to make sure no gas attacks ever occurred in Syria again. Alternately described as one of the former president’s greatest successes or as one of his worst failures, what remains of Obama’s red line deal is now under attack. After a UN-appointed panel determined that Syrian President Bashar al- Assad’s forces are still using poison gas, albeit at a much more limited scale than before, Putin refused to abide by the September 2013 deal, which promised joint U.S.-Russian efforts in the United Nations to punish all violators. As newly inaugurated president Donald J. Trump takes the reins of U.S. Syria policy, he will have to decide whether to pursue Western efforts to hold Assad accountable and force Putin to uphold his end of the deal, at the risk of exhausting conflicts; or whether he should let Putin have his way and try to extract the United States from its entanglements in Syria. His choices, and Putin’s, will have important consequences not only for Syria but also for Russian-American relations and for global norms against the use of chemical weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.Margalla-Papers-2019-Issue-II.Pdf
    Volume: XXIII, Issue-II, 2019 ISSN 1999-2297 MARGALLA P A P E R S A Journal of International Affairs Institute of Strategic Studies, Research and Analysis (ISSRA) National Defence University Islamabad - Pakistan Volume: XXIII, Issue-II, 2019 ISSN 1999-2297 Institute of Strategic Studies, Research and Analysis (ISSRA) National Defence University Islamabad - Pakistan Volume: XXIII, Issue-II, 2019 ISSN 1999-2297 Volume: XXIII, Issue-II, 2019 ISSN 1999-2297 Volume: XXIII, Issue-II, 2019 ISSN 1999-2297 Disclaimer The contents of this 'Journal' are writers’ personal views. The statements, facts and opinions by the authors in the Margalla Papers do not imply the official policy of the National Defence University and Editors or the Publishers. 1 PRIORITIZING THE DEFENCE AGAINST BIOLOGICAL THREATS: PAKISTAN'S RESPONSE AND PREPAREDNESS Rubina Ali and Manzoor Khan Afridi * Abstract Biological threats pose significant risks to national and international security. A deliberate release of biological agents whether by terrorist groups or individual perpetrators constitutes an immediate threat to the life and health of the people. Many biological agents can spread infectious diseases or cause illness in humans. In the 21st century, infectious diseases are the second leading cause of death worldwide. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the unsettled problems in the arena of biosecurity and health security. Moreover, the rapid development of biotechnology leads to an increased threat of biological weapons. Therefore, this article articulates how a state can effectively protect the health and life of its citizens from these threats. The main objective of this paper is to encapsulate the perilous weaknesses in existing preparedness for countering biological risks.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2013 Nobel Peace Prize Lecture Delivered By
    Working Together for a World Free of Chemical Weapons, and Beyond Ahmet Üzümcü Director-General OPCW 2013 Nobel Peace Prize Lecture OPCW Your Majesties, Distinguished members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Excellencies, Ladies and gentlemen, It is with profound humility that I accept this prize on behalf of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, its Member States, their Ambassadors and Secretariat staff, past and present – some of whom are with us today, including my immediate predecessor, Ambassador Rogelio Pfirter. This award recognises our combined efforts. Efforts which flow from the collective spirit of the OPCW in working towards a common good that serves all humanity. I feel deeply privileged to be able to address you on this occasion. I also take this opportunity to honour the memory of Nelson Mandela. He will remain, for all of us and future generations, a beacon for what can be achieved against overwhelming odds to advance peace, dignity and reconciliation. ******************** 1 The Nobel Committee has a long history of honouring achievement in disarmament. Yet, this is the first time that the Peace Prize has been awarded to an organisation that is actively engaged in disarmament as a practical and ongoing reality. For sixteen years now, the OPCW has been overseeing the elimination of an entire category of weapons of mass destruction. Our task is to consign chemical weapons to history, forever. A task we have been carrying out with quiet determination, and no small measure of success. Under the terms of the Chemical Weapons Convention, the OPCW has so far verified the destruction of more than 80% of all declared chemical weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Discurso Del Director General De La Organización Para La
    Mem. Inst. Investig. Cienc. Salud. 2016;14(2):122-129 Doi: 10.18004/Mem.iics/1812-9528/2016.014(02)122-129 Otros/ Others Discurso del Director General de la Organización para la Prohibición de la Armas Químicas (OPCW), Ahmet Üzümcü, en ocasión de recibir el Premio Nobel de la Paz 2013, Oslo, Noruega, el 10 de diciembre de 2013 Lecture delivered by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)Director-General, Ahmet Üzümcü, during the awarding ceremony of the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway, on December 10, 2013 Sus Altezas, Distinguidos miembros del Comité Nobel Noruego, Excelencias, Damas y Caballeros, Con profunda humildad acepto este premio en representación de la Organización para la Prohibición de las Armas Químicas, sus Estados Miembros, sus Embajadores y el equipo de la Secretaría, pasado y presente, algunos de los cuales están hoy con nosotros, incluyendo a mi predecesor inmediato, el Embajador Rogelio Pfirter. Este premio reconoce nuestros esfuerzos combinados. Esfuerzos que fluyen del espíritu colectivo de la OPCW de trabajar por el bien común que sirva a toda la humanidad. Me siento profundamente privilegiado de poder dirigirme a ustedes en esta ocasión. También aprovecho esta oportunidad para honrar la memoria de Nelson Mandela. El será, para todos nosotros y las futuras generaciones, un modelo de lo que se puede lograr contra probabilidades abrumadoras para avanzar en la paz, la dignidad y la reconciliación. ******************** El Comité Nobel tiene una larga historia de honrar logros en desarme. Sin embargo, es la primera vez que el Premio de la Paz se entrega a una organización que está activamente involucrada en el desarme como una realidad práctica y en marcha.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue #103 March/April 2013 Powered by Translate
    Search Select Language Issue #103 March/April 2013 Powered by Translate Like Share 17 people like this. Be the first of your friends. News & Highlights Peace Education in the Peace Education in the Spotlight of a Nobel Nomination Field The International Peace Bureau, 1910 Action Alerts Nobel Peace Laureate, nominated Betty Reardon for this year’s Nobel Events & Conferences Peace Prize, citing her many years in Educational Programs the development and dissemination of peace education throughout the world. Publications & Research The letter of nomination from co­ President Tomas Magnusson Jobs & Funding acknowledges the significance of Opportunities education to the achievement of peace and the need for its introduction into Quick Links schools and all learning settings GCPE Website around the world (click here to read the Subscribe nomination letter). The nomination Archives sheds light on the essential fact that Contribute to the the people of the world must learn how Newsletter to dismantle the war system and intentionally design and construct a Make a tax­deductible disarmed and demilitarized world. contribution to the Global Campaign (coming soon) When peace educators first sought to make common cause with researchers and activists in the production and application of what Reardon has referred to as peace knowledge – all that is learned through the work of all sectors of the world­wide peace movement – their practice was viewed by research scholars and peace activist as a positive complement to, but not an essential and integral part of the larger movement. In those years there was, as well, little effort at active collaboration between research and activism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Peace Prize – Short List for 2013
    Fredrik S. Heffermehl, Oslo, Lawyer and author, Latest title: The Nobel Peace Prize. What Nobel Really Wanted (Praeger, 2010) (published in Chinese, Finnish, Swedish (with Spanish, Russian coming). Phone: +47 917 44 783, email: [email protected], website http://www.nobelwill.org The Nobel peace prize – short list for 2013 (Who are QUALIFIED under the purpose of Nobel, as specified in his 1895 will?) In 2012 the Swedish authorities ordered the Nobel Foundation to respect the purpose described by Alfred Nobel in his will, i.e. to support those working to replace global militarism with global co-operation to realize a global peace system based on global law and disarmament. (For details, see: http://www.nobelwill.org). While Nobel had a plan for global peace and specified the kind of peace work he intended to support, the Norwegian awarders hand the their “Nobels” out in all directions without any idea or vision of how peace must be achieved. Few of the nominees for 2013 are qualified if the awarders would promote the peace vision of Nobel, instead of their own ideas. As documented by Fredrik S. Heffermehl in “The Nobel Peace Prize. What Nobel Really Wanted (Praeger, 2010), Nobel did not use the word “peace prize,“ he dedicated his prize to “the champions of peace,” further specified as “… the one who shall have done the most or the best work to realize the brotherhood of nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies as well as the organization and promotion of peace congresses” (quotes from 1895 will). Nominees qualified for the 2013 Nobel peace prize dedicated his prize to “the champions of peace,” those working for global demilitarization.
    [Show full text]
  • OPCW Is the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize Winner* Another Nobel Prize to Chemists!
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 116, No 1, 7–8, 2014 CODEN PDBIAD ISSN 0031-5362 OPCW is the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize winner* Another Nobel Prize to chemists! orwegian committee for awarding Nobel Peace Prize announced DANKO ŠKARE Nin Oslo at the beginning of October that 2013 Nobel Peace Prize E-mail: [email protected] winner is the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The prize is 1.25 million of US dollars (eight million euros). OPCW, a worldwide organization with its headquarters in The Hague, has since 1997 been committed to combating the use of chemical weapons and implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) from year 1992. The full title is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, hereinafter referred to as „the Convention“. The Convention is part of global agreement on the prohibition of weap- ons for mass destruction. OPCW (hereinafter referred to as „the Orga- nization“) gathers 190 membering countries, i.e. 98% of mankind. On Monday, October 14, 2013 Syria became the 190th member. This means that almost all members of the United Nations Organization accepted the Convention! This Convention has been best accepted worldwide, even if compared to conventions on biological or nuclear weapons. This is understandable because what mankind – from all weapons of mass destruction – dreads the most is the use of chemical weapons. Compared to other weapons, chemical weapons are relatively available and inex- pensive so that fear of its use for, e.g. terrorist purposes, is quite compre- hensible.
    [Show full text]
  • Sampling and Analysis of Organophosphorus Nerve Agents: Analytical Chemistry in International Chemical Disarmament
    Pure Appl. Chem. 2017; 89(2): 249–258 Conference paper Elena Fischer, Marc-Michael Blum, Wesam S. Alwana and Jonathan E. Forman* Sampling and analysis of organophosphorus nerve agents: analytical chemistry in international chemical disarmament DOI 10.1515/pac-2016-0902 Abstract: Chemistry is a science that contributes to all aspects of our everyday lives and our professions. There are clear examples in law enforcement (forensics) and public health and perhaps less clear (but equally important) uses of chemicals in applications that include automobile manufacturing, electronics, packag- ing materials, currency printing, and even waste management (recycling and value-added products from garbage). Chemistry can also influence international diplomacy – an area that is likely to be unfamiliar to many chemistry professionals. Take for example the United Nations led investigation into the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria in August of 2013. Environmental and biomedical samples were collected and analyzed, and they undisputedly confirmed the use of the nerve agent sarin. The results were published in a report by the United Nations Secretary-General and were one of the many influences leading to the acces- sion of The Syrian Arab Republic to the Chemical Weapons Convention (an international treaty prohibiting chemical weapons) and the declaration and dismantlement of a chemical weapons programme. Using this investigation as an example, we highlight some of the chemistry that influenced decision making in a high visibility international
    [Show full text]
  • Education, Outreach and the OPCW: Growing Partnerships for a Global Ban
    Pure Appl. Chem. 2017; 89(2): 189–195 Conference paper Joseph Ballard and Jonathan E. Forman* Education, outreach and the OPCW: growing partnerships for a global ban DOI 10.1515/pac-2016-0903 Abstract: The Chemical Weapons Convention remains a landmark international treaty. It was the first mul- tilateral agreement to ban an entire class of weapons of mass destruction and include a strict verification regime to monitor compliance. Scientists were not only deeply engaged in the negotiation of the Chemical Weapons Convention, but have been central to the life of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) ever since it came into existence almost 20 years ago. Over that time, during which the OPCW focused primarily on its mission to oversee the destruction of chemical weapons stockpiles, the organ- ization has relied on a very committed core of scientific expertise – from within and outside – to help guide it. As that core task comes to a close, the Organization faces a new challenge: ensuring that chemical weapons do not return. Meeting that challenge will require new approaches to the OPCW’s mission. Keywords: chemical weapons; chemical weapons convention; disarmament; education; international treaty; Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons; outreach; 2016 Spring ConfChem. Introduction The collection of papers in this issue of Pure and Applied Chemistry were featured in the Spring 2016 Con- fchem [1], an online colloquium that went live just as the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) opened the celebration of its founding at the inaugural OPCW Day event in The Hague.1 This event reflected on the organizations 19 year journey to 2016, the transition of the organization into the future and the evolving nature of chemical disarmament.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred First Annual Commencement Ceremony
    ONE HUNDRED FIRST ANNUAL COMMENCEMENT CEREMONY Saturday, the ninth of May Two Thousand Twenty ONE HUNDRED FIRST ANNUAL COMMENCEMENT CEREMONY Saturday, the ninth of May Two Thousand Twenty United States · Switzerland · Austria · the Netherlands China · Thailand · Ghana · Greece · Uzbekistan For additional information on this Virtual Commencement Ceremony, and to view the ceremony on May 9, 2020, please visit webster.edu/commencement Greetings from the Chancellor ELIZABETH (BETH) J. STROBLE, PHD Graduates, colleagues, friends, family and honored guests: This moment celebrates the culmination of years of diligent work and dedicated study by the exceptional students who select Webster University on their path to global academic excellence. We take pride in Webster’s students who make their homes in places as far apart as Athens and Charleston, Tashkent and Saint Louis, among the many communities Webster calls home. As Webster alumni, these graduates join an elite global community of accomplished and connected citizens. From the first two graduates in the Class of 1919 to the more than 4,700 graduates in the Class of 2020, they embody 1 the promise of Webster’s enduring commitment to inclusive education. Graduates, we know the significance of this day in your life and career, and like you, we are saddened that a global health crisis prevents us from being together in person. But it is important that we take this moment to celebrate with you today, and we hope you can join us in person in the fall. Wherever in the world your journey takes you next, and wherever you call home in the future, Webster University goes with you as your proud alma mater.
    [Show full text]