DOCSLIB.ORG

Second Five-Year Review Report for Plattsburgh Air Force Base (AFB), Plattsburgh, Clinton County, New York.” on Behalf of the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Second Five-Year Review Report for Plattsburgh Air Force Base (AFB), Plattsburgh, Clinton County, New York.” on Behalf of the U.S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 2 290 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NY 10007-1866 Nov 18 2004 Ms. Kathryn M. Halvorson Acting Director Air Force Real Property Agency 1700 North Moore St. Suite 2300 Arlington, Virginia 22209-2802 Re: CERCLA Five-Year Review Plattsburgh Air Force Base Dear Ms. Halvorson: This is in regard to the “Second Five-Year Review Report for Plattsburgh Air Force Base (AFB), Plattsburgh, Clinton County, New York.” On behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), I am pleased to advise you that EPA concurs with the protectiveness determinations made in the report. Our review of the report was conducted in accordance with EPA’s “Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance” (OSWER Directive No. 9355.7-03B-P). Beyond the remedial actions evaluated in this review, the Air Force is also proceeding with additional studies, designs, and remedial actions (including institutional controls) that may be necessary to protect public health and the environment at other areas at Plattsburgh AFB. Remedies at these remaining areas are at various stages in the Superfund process. Until such time as all remedy decisions have been made for the Plattsburgh AFB site, a comprehensive sitewide protectiveness determination must be reserved. Notwithstanding the above, EPA concurs that the remedies selected and implemented for Plattsburgh AFB, as reported in this Five-Year Review, are protective. EPA comments on specific portions of the Five-Year Review Report will be transmitted separately to Plattsburgh AFB, and any resulting issues will be resolved with the base. We thank you for the extensive efforts made by the Air Force in conducting this Five-Year Review, and we look forward to continuing our work together m addressing environmental investigation and cleanup of Plattsburgh AFB. RECEIVED NOV 29 2004 AFRPA/DA PLBG Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper If you have any questions regarding the subject of this letter, please contact me at (212) · 637-4390 or have your staff contact Bob Morse, EPA ~roject Manager, at (212) 637-4331. Sincerely, {c:eorge Pavlou, Director . Emergency and Remedial Response Division cc: James Waldron, AFRPA . Michael D. Sorel, AFRPA Dale A. Desnoyers, NYSDEC James Lister, NYSDEC FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT FOR PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE PLATTSBURGH, CLINTON COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: AIR FORCE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS AFCEE CONTRACT NO. F41624-03-D-8609 DELIVERY ORDER 0111 Prepared by: URS CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK FINAL SEPTEMBER 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS........................................................................................................................... vi FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUMMARY FORM............................................................................................ ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Site Description .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Physical Features ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Land Use/Reuse ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Water Usage .................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.5 Environmental Investigations/Cleanup .............................................................................. 2-3 3.0 OPERATIONAL UNIT DESCRIPTIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTION SUMMARY.............. 3-1 3.1 LF-022 Source Control................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 LF-023 Source Control................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 SS-011 Soil Operable Unit.............................................................................................. 3-3 3.4 ST-020 .......................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.5 LF-023 Groundwater, Surface Water, and Sediment ...................................................... 3-3 3.6 LF-021 Soil and Groundwater........................................................................................ 3-4 3.7 LF-024 Soil and Groundwater........................................................................................ 3-4 3.8 SS-005 Soil Operable Unit............................................................................................. 3-5 3.9 SS-006SoilOperableUnit................................................................................................ 3-5 3.10 SS-010 Soil Operable Unit............................................................................................. 3-6 3.11 SS-018 and SS-028...................................................................................................... 3-6 3.12 SS-033 ......................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.13 FT-002 Source Operable Unit....................................................................................... 3-8 3.14 SS-017 Source Operable Unit....................................................................................... 3-9 3.15 SS-026 ........................................................................................................................ 3-10 3.16 Fire Training Area (FT-002)/Industrial Area Groundwater Operable Unit ...................... 3-11 3.17 Status of Other IRP Sites............................................................................................... 3-12 3.17.1 No Further Action IRP Sites ............................................................................. 3-12 3.17.2 Pending No Further Action IRP Sites ................................................................ 3-13 3.17.3 Pending Investigations/Remedial Actions............................................................ 3-13 3.17.3.1 CERCLA Remedial Investigations/Remedial Actions........................... 3-13 3.17.3.2 NYSDEC Fuel-Spill Sites.................................................................. 3-13 3.18 EBS Factors ................................................................................................................ 3-14 4.0 PROGRESS S1NCE THE LAST FIVE- YEAR REVIEW ........................................................ 4-1 4.1 SS-011 .......................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Previous Five-Year Review Recommendations.................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Follow-up Actions............................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 LF-021 .......................................................................................................................... 4-2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page No. 4.2.1 Previous Five-Year Review Recommendations..................................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Follow-up Actions ............................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 LF-024 ........................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3.1 Previous Five-Year Review Recommendations..................................................... 4-2 4.3.2 Follow-up Actions ............................................................................................... 4-3 4.4 LF-022............................................................................................................................. 4-3 4.4.1 Previous Five-Year Review Recommendations...................................................... 4-3 4.4.2 Follow-up Actions................................................................................................. 4-3 4.5 LF-023 Source Control & Groundwater, Surface Water, and Sediment............................. 4-4 4.5.1 Previous Five-Year Review Recommendations....................................................... 4-4 4.5.2 Follow-up Actions ................................................................................................ 4-4 4.6 SS-005 Soil ...................................................................................................................... 4-5 4.6.1 Previous Five-Year Review Recommendations....................................................... 4-5 4.6.2 Follow-up Actions ................................................................................................ 4-5 4.7 SS-006 Soil ...................................................................................................................... 4-5 4.7.1 Previous Five-Year Review Recommendations....................................................... 4-5 4.7.2 Follow-up Actions.................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New York State Department of Transportation Passenger Transportation Division Aviation Services Bureau Newsletter
    NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION DIVISION AVIATION SERVICES BUREAU NEWSLETTER MARCH, 1998 web site: http://www.dot.state.ny.us Phone:518-457-2821/fax 518-457-9779 __________________________________________________________________________________________ George E. Pataki, Governor Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner __________________________________________________________________________________________ NORTH COUNTRY AIRPORTS ASSIST ICE operations during the ten days the airport’s power was STORM RELIEF: On January 7, 1998 a major ice out. storm hit large areas of Northern New York depositing over four (4) inches of ice, downing trees Clinton County Airport, located in Plattsburgh, served and demolishing hundreds of miles of power and a similar role. With the main roads blocked and the telephone lines. With roads virtually impassable and ferry across Lake Champlain closed for the winter, the thousands of people stranded without power spread airport was the only way in or out of Plattsburgh. across thousands of square miles, New York State’s Serving as the primary transportation hub for the North Country airports were to serve a crucial role in region, Clinton County Airport’s airport manager, supporting the emergency relief efforts that followed. Ralph Hensel, reported that the passenger terminal was full of passengers coming and going all day long In an effort to stay open, airport crews worked on Saturday, January 10th. Without power for two around the clock in an attempt to limit ice build up on days, the airport managed to continue their regularly their runways. The North Country NYSDOT facilities scheduled passenger service with virtually no provided road graders to two airports to assist them in interruptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements
    TTOOWWNN OOFF PPLLAATTTTSSBBUURRGGHH CCOOMMPPRREEHHEENNSSIIVVEE LLAANNDD UUSSEE PPLLAANN 2010 Prepared by: Chazen Engineering, Land Surveying & Landscape Architects Co., P.C. Adopted by the Plattsburgh Town Board: December, 2010 Prepared by: Chazen Engineering, Land Surveying & Landscape Architects Co., P.C. Prepared for: Town of Plattsburgh 151 Banker Road Plattsburgh, NY 12901‐7307 December 2010 The Chazen Companies December 2010 Town of Plattsburgh Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgements Comprehensive Plan Land Use Committee Eleanor (Elle) Garrell Berger Hope Coryer Glenn Cutter Eric Day David Kimmel Betty Ann King Marty Mannix Tim Palmer Colin Read, Chair Jerry Rosenbaum Jeff Wagner Thomas Wood Plattsburgh Town Board Bernie Bassett, Supervisor Rickey Collins, Town Clerk Paul Lamoy Marty Mannix Gerard Renadette Tom Wood Town of Plattsburgh Staff Philip E. Von Bargen James Bosley Steve Imhoff Tamber Shepard Allen Reece The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Committee and Town Board would like to thank the citizens of Plattsburgh who contributed their ideas to and participated in the creation of this plan. This document was prepared with the assistance of a 2008 New York State Community Development Grant (CDBG) as Project No. 928CP4‐08 administered by the Office of Community Renewal for the 2008 Community Strategic Planning Technical Assistance Grant Round The Chazen Companies December 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................I 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Champlain- Lake George Regional Planning Board
    LAKE CHAMPLAIN- LAKE GEORGE REGIONAL PLANNING BOARD 2016 COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (CEDS) Committee Members Clinton County Harry McMannus Chairman Clinton County Board of Legislators Rodney Brown Director Community Planning and Development Paul Grasso Director Clinton County Area Development Corporation James Calnon Director Workforce Investment Board Essex County William Fevebee Chair Essex County Board of Supervisors Mike Mascarenas Director Planning and Community Development Carol Calabrese Director Essex County Development Corporation Jim McKenna Director Essex County Visitors Bureau Ellen Gordon Director One Work Source Business Center Hamilton County William Farber Chairman Hamilton County Board of Supervisors Christy Wilt Director Tourism William Osborne Director Economic Development Warren County Kevin Geharty Chairman Warren County Board of Supervisors Wayne LaMothe Director Planning and Community Development Ed Bartholomew President Warren County REDC Chris Hunsinger Director Employment and Training Center Joanne Conley Director Warren County Tourism Jack Diamond Mayor City of Glens Falls Washington County Robert Henke Chairman Washington County Board of Supervisors Deanna Derway President Washington County LDC Bud Taylor Chairman Warren-Washington Counties IDA Regional Groups Jim Murphy Director Adirondack Economic Development Corporation George Ferone President Adirondack Regional Chamber of Commerce Steve Hunt Reg. Director Empire State Development Corporation Garry Douglas President North County Chamber
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2.5 Aviation Facilities And
    I-87 Multimodal Corridor Study AVIATION FACILITIES & OPERATIONS Existing Corridor Conditions & Opportunities 2.5. AVIATION FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS 2.5.1. Aviation Analysis Area Aviation systems somewhat resemble Interstate highways, as access is provided at fixed, predetermined locations. Each airport in a system essentially functions as a highway interchange. Like interchanges, airports can substantially influence the economic development of the communities surrounding them. Speed, time, cost, and complexity distinguish aviation from other transportation modes. Aircraft provide the fastest means for the transport of people, and thus, are primarily used for longer trips (e.g., over 300 miles). However, airline service often requires passengers to spend over an hour at an airport during both arrival and departure. Thus, the amount of time that an individual saves by flying must compensate for the amount of time spent at the airport. For transportation within the I-87 corridor, aviation does not typically provide the most cost- or time-efficient method of travel. However, air travel is typically the only mode of transportation considered for trips over 1,000 miles. The airports along the I-87 corridor provide daily non-stop flights to tourist and business destinations (e.g., Florida, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Las Vegas, etc.), with connecting flights to any destination worldwide. For air cargo, cost plays a primary role in choosing aviation over other transportation modes. The air cargo industry predominantly transports goods of low weight, high value, and/or high time sensitivity, such as documents, mail, and small packages. The time sensitivity of business- related packages has grown in recent decades, creating marked growth in the overnight document industry (e.g., UPS, FedEx, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision for Ou7 for the Former
    FINAL RECORD OF DECISION FLIGHTLINE (SS-004) FORMER PLATTSBURGH AIR FORCE BASE PLATTSBURGH, NEW YORK Air Force Civil Engineer Center Building 171 2261 Hughes Avenue, Suite 155, Joint Base San Antonio Lackland, TX September 2018 This page is intentionally left blank. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................Page No. 1.0 DECISION SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Statement of Basis and Purpose ............................................................................. 2 1.2 Description of the Remedy .................................................................................... 2 1.3 Statutory Determination ......................................................................................... 2 1.4 Authorizing Signatures .......................................................................................... 3 2.0 SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION ........................................................... 5 3.0 SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES ................................................... 7 4.0 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION .................................................................................... 8 5.0 SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT ..................................................................... 9 6.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #254 - 04/22/20
    RESOLUTION #254 - 04/22/20 RESOLUTION CALLING ON THE STATE OF NEW YORK TO RELEASE ENHANCED FEDERAL MEDICAID MATCHING FUNDS TO COUNTIES AND NEW YORK CITY - LEGISLATURE BY: WHEREAS, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress has enacted extraordinary measures to help states and localities with increased costs and lost revenues; and WHEREAS, a key action enacted by the federal government was a 6.2 percent increase in the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP); and WHEREAS, Congress has used this mechanism to provide fiscal relief to states and their local government Medicaid funding partners to reduce the financial burden they often experience in an economic downturn; and WHEREAS, all counties and New York City are struggling with higher costs responding to COVID-19 and experiencing extensive revenue declines due to the shutdown of large swaths of the economy; and WHEREAS, we project that each quarter of enhanced FMAP funding is worth hundreds of millions of dollars for counties and New York City; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, the County of Clinton is respectfully requesting financial assistance through federal FMAP monies by retroactively reducing county weekly Medicaid payments effective January 1, 2020 and returning excess funds already paid by the counties and New York City to provide some partial fiscal relief to the current conditions; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Clinton County Legislature also respectfully requests that the State provide a timeline to all counties on the release of the enhanced federal Medicaid matching funds related to the Affordable Care Act “reconciliation funds” that have been withheld for over three years and is the likely mechanism on how these funds will be delivered to counties and New York City; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, a certified copy of this resolution be sent to Governor Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • Adirondack Regional Airport
    N EW Y ORK S TATEWIDE AIRPORT E CONOMIC B ENEFITS S TUDY November 2003 6. ECONOMIC IMPACTS BY AIRPORT The economic impact analysis has demonstrated the significant contribution that New York State’s airports make to the economy. The airports act as economic catalysts, supporting direct as well as secondary employment, payroll, and output benefits. Further, as identified through this study’s surveys, businesses throughout the State rely on the availability of commercial service and general aviation airports. The following section presents the benefits that 76 of New York’s airports provide. Qualitative benefits provided by each airport are also noted. These 76 airports were identified for specific study, while the impact for remaining public and private use airports in New York State was estimated by grouping and extrapolating results. The remainder of the report is organized alphabetically with the commercial service airports first, followed by the general aviation airports. Adirondack Regional Airport Adirondack Regional Airport is a commercial service Airport serving the Saranac Lake region. Continental Connection (Commutair) provides service from the Airport to Albany and Plattsburgh, with one-stop service to Boston, MA, on a twice daily basis. In addition to commercial service, Adirondack Regional supports general aviation activity. The Airport’s economic impact was measured through the use of two surveys: aircraft tenant and on-Airport business. Surveys of on-Airport employers revealed that 31 full and part-time jobs and over $3.3 million in expenditures are a direct result of on-Airport businesses, including Airport management employment and spending. It should be noted that the impact of all of these numbers is multiplied by successive rounds of spending within the local economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
    Clinton County Pre-Disaster Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Five Year Update March 2014 Prepared for the County of Clinton by Friends of the North Country, Inc. 1 Mill Street, P. 0. Box 446 Keeseville, New York 518-834-9606 CLINTON COUNTY PRE-DISASTER MULTIJURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FIVE YEAR UPDATE Table of Contents Section I - Plan Narrative- pages 1-61 Executive Summary Planning Process Background Risk Assessment/Hazard Profiles (Severe Repetitive Loss) Mitigation Actions Plan Monitoring/Maintenance Appendix A – Lists of Participants Appendix B – Development, Worksheets, Press Reports, County Planning Appendix C – Jurisdictional Participation Appendix D – Climate Change Facts Appendix E – Assets by Municipality Appendix F – Contact Lists Town of Altona Appendix G – Resources Appendix H – Funding Sources Appendix I – County/Municipality Resolution Sample Appendix J - Plan Maintenance Forms Appendix K – Evacuation Routes and Shelters Appendix L - Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool Section II - Jurisdictional Information (alphabetical) - pages 1- 96 Buildings/Structures/Degree of Loss by Municipality Appendix IIA – Mitigation Action Plans Appendix IIB – Clinton County Plan Section III – Public Participation Materials - pages 1-47 Executive Summary The Draft Clinton County Pre-Disaster Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update July 2013, (the Plan) is to be reviewed by NY State Emergency Management Office personnel. All towns and villages within the county of Clinton participated in the planning process and the review of the draft Plan. Copies of each jurisdiction’s resolution of adoption of the Plan are to be attached at the end of the plan document, hard copy, as soon as they are available. Resolutions will be passed when notice is received of the FEMA “Approvable Plan” status.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Plattsburgh Economic Development Strategic Plan
    TOWN OF PLATTSBURGH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN JULY 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS July 2013 Town of Plattsburgh Town Council Bernard C Bassett Tom E Wood Marty D Mannix Paul D Lamoy Gerard A Renadette Planning Advisory Committee Diane Akey Michele Powers Paul Grasso Phil Von Bargen Dr. John Jablonski Steve Wible Marty Mannix © 2013 Laberge Group, Project #2012022 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ IV INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... IV COMMUNITY OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... IV PLATTSBURGH’S HIGHLIGHTS & OPPORTUNITIES............................................................................................ V DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................. V ECONOMIC PROFILE HIGHLIGHTS ................................................................................................................. VI COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................................................... VII PLATTSBURGH’S VISION & IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................. IX DEVELOPMENT OF GOALS & ACTION PRIORITIES ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]