DIcument of The World Bank
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 4615-BD
Public Disclosure Authorized STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT
BANGLADE SH
BWDB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized
April 10, 1984
South Asia Projects Department
Public Disclosure Authorized Irrigation I Division
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
US$ 1 Taka 25.0 Taka 1= US$ 0.04
WEICHTS AND MEASURES
English/US Units Metric lJnits
1 foot (ft) = 30.5 centimeters (cm) 1 yard (yd) = 0,915 meters (m) 1 mile (mi) = 1.609 k-ilometers (km) 1 acre (ac) = 0.405 hectare (ha) 1 square mile (sq mi) 259 hectares (ha) 1 pound 0.454 kilograms (kg) 1 long ton (ig ton) = 1,016 kilograms (1.016 tons)
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS USED
BADC - Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation BRDB - Bangladesh Rural Development Board BWDB - Bangladesh Water Development Board CE - Chief Engineer DAE - Directorate of Agriculture Extension DEM - Directorate of Extension and Management DOF - Department of Fisheries EE - Executive Engineer FFW - Food for Work Program GDP - Gross Domestic Product GNP - Gross National Product COB - Government of Bangladesh PYV - High Yielding Variety ICB - International Competitive Bidding MTh - Irrigation Management Program IRR - Internal Rate of Return IWDFC - Irrigation, Water Development and Flood Control Division of Ministry of Agriculture KSS - Krishi Samabaya Samiti (Village Agricultural Society) LCB - Local Competitive Bidding MOA - Ministry of Agriculture O and M - Operation and Maintenance PSA - Project Special Account PPS III - Project Planning Schemes III Directorate SDR - Special Drawing Right SE - Superinterding Engineer TCCA - Thana Central Cooperative Association -i- FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
GLOSSARY
Aman - Rice planted before or during the monsoon and harvested ix:November - December
Aus - Rice planted during February or March and harvested during June or July
B. - When preceding a crop means broadcast Beel - Saucer-shaped area subject to flooding by rain or river water
Boro - Rice transplantedin December to January and harvested in April to May
District - Administrativeunit in the charge of a Deputy Commissioner comprising a number of subdivisions
Khal - Natural channel
'harif - Summer season (May through October) Monsoon - Period of rains starting in June and ending in October
Paddy - Unhusked rice Parishad - Board constituted for specific assignmente comprising elected and Goverinment nominated members
Rabi - Winter season (October through May)
Subdivision - Administrativeunit comprising several thanas T. - When preceding a crop means transplanted
Thana - Smallest administrativeunit, formerly called a Police Station
Upazila - Upgraded thana as defined by Local Government (Thana Parishad and Thana Administration)Ordinance 1982
Union - Unit of self-governmentat village level; there are about ten unions in a thana
FISCAL YEAR (FY)
July 1 - June 30
This documenthas a restricteddistribution and may be used by recipientsonly in the performanceof their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. -ii-
BANGLADESH
BWDB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT
Table of Contents
Page No.
I. SECTORIAL BACKGROUND *..... *... P 99949 ...... 4 1
Agricultural Performance and Policies ...... 1 Agricultural Sector Programs 6nd Institutior,al Arrangements . 3 Physical Features ...... *.* .*.**. ...e.**. *. **. 3 Water Subsector Development 44...... Prc&rams to Strengthen t'le Bangladesh Water DeveJopeint Board. 6 Operation and Maintenance of BWDB Schemes 7 Cost Recovery 8.
II. TOE cROJECT...... *.. * **94, 8 Location ...... 8 biect Ives .....§8 Project Description ...... - -..... *. *...... 9 Criteria for Selection of Subprojects ...... 10 Project Components 11 Subproject Civil Works .* * .. 9 . 16
III. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 17 Institutional Arrangements 0 17 Coordination at the National Level ...... 18 Coordination at the Field Level 18 Procedures for Subproject Implementation 19 Operation and Maintenance of Subprojects 20 Implementation Schedule **.. ... * *** **** 9 99* 21 Monitoringand Evaluation 9*99 *9* 99999.9,.9999994.994...... 999 21
IV. PROJECT COSTS, FINANCING, AND DISBURSEMENT *o*eee...... 22 Project Costs *. 9 .999949999999949-9 * 22 Financing .... *...... * ..... 999999499994.*9 94994 *.*** 23 Procurement *94*9499 .* . 24 Disbursement 26 Project Special Account 27 Accounts and Audit ...... 28 -liii-
Page No.
V. PRODUCTION, MARKETING AND PRICES, FARM INCOME, COST RECOVERY. 29 Production ...... 29 Marketing and Prices ...... *.. 30
VI. BENEFITS AND JUSTIFICATION ...... 33 Production and Employment ... *. . 33 Economic Analysis ...... * 34 Sensitivityand Risks ...... -...... *...t 35
VII. AGREEMENTS REACHED AND RECOMMENDATION ...... 36
List of Annexes
2.1 Climatic Elements
Table 1 - Mymensingh Table 2 - Khulna Table 3 - Barisal Table 4 - Jessore
2.2 Guidelines for Selection of Subprojects
2.3 Scope of Consultancy Services for Subprojects
4.1 Detailed Cost Tables
Table 1 - Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage Improvement Table 2 - Kalaroa Drainage Table 3 - Bighai River Flood Control Table 4 - Chenchuri Irrig,ation Table 5 Strengthening BWDB Table 5a - Strengthening BWDB - Pilot 0 and M Program Table 6 - Unappraised Flood Control and Drainage Subprojects Table 7 - Unappraised Drainage Subprojects Table 8 - Unappraised Flood Control Subprojects Table 9 - Unappraised Irrigation Subprojects Table 10 - Summary Account by Project Component
4.2 Procurement Schedules
Tabl.e 1 - Civil Works Table 2 - Equipment -iv-
4.3 Table 1 - Summary Account by Time Table 2 - Proposed Credit Allocation Table 3 - Estimated Schedule of Disbursements
5.1 Cropping Patterns of Appraised Subprojects
5.2 Farm Budgets
Table 1 - Flood Control and Drainage Subprojects, Present and Future With Project
Table 2 - Flood Control and Drainage Subprojects, Present and Future Without Project
Table 3 - Irrigation Subprojects, Present and Future With Project
Table 4 - Irrigation Subprojects, Present and Future Without Project
6.1 Economic Prices
Table 1 - Paddy Table 2 - Wheat Table 3 - Jute Table 4 - Oilseeds Table 5 - Fertilizers
6.2 Economic Benefits and Costs
CfARTS
25485 - Bighai. Area Elevation curve as compared to Stages of the Bishkali River at Bamna Station
25486 - Kalaroa. Area Elevation Distribution as compared to stages of the Betna River at Kalaroa Station
25487 - Kangsha. Area Elevation Distribution as compared to River Kangsha stages
25489 - BWDB Organization Chart
25490 - BWDB Organization Chart for Planning and Implementation of SubprGJects
25828 - Organization - Pilot Decentralized 0 and M Program
25587 - Implementation Schedule MaPs
17471 - Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage Project - Layout of Works
17472 - Kalaroa Drainage Project - Layout of Works
17473 - Bighai Flood Control Project - Layout of Works
17474 - Chenchuri Beel Irrigation Project - Layout of Works
17477 - Location Map of Subprojects BANGLADESH
BWDB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT
STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT
I. SECTORIAL BACKGROUND
Background
1.01 The Government of Bangladesh (GOB) in its Second Five-Year Plan (FY81-85) gives highest priority to the objective of achieving foodgrain self-sufficiency. In the water subsector, the strategy for assisting GOB in reaching this objective is to emphasize short gestating, low capital cost per acre, high rate of return projects. This strategy was earlier identified in the Bank report: The Land and Water Sector Study - Bangladesh (Report No. PS- 13, December 1, 1972) and reconfirmeed in the Joint Document of GOB and the World Bank - Review of the Bangladesh Water Development Board (Report No. 2327-BD, April 2, 1979). Minor irrigation schemes in areas of little or no flooding and drainage and flood control schemes in areas of moderate flooding were to be emphasized.
1.02 In October 1982, GOB signed a contract with PRC Engineering Consultants International to prepare feasibility reports on selected sub- projects reflecting the above strategy. Funding was provided under the Fourth Technical Assistance Project (Cr. 1124-BD). GOB invited IDA to appraise a project based on four complered subproject feasibility reports (i.e., Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage, Kalaroa Drainage; Bighai River Flood Control, and North Chenchuri Beel Irrigation, April 1983). This report is based upon the findings of an IDA appraisal mission, comprising Messrs. W. Fairchild, C.P. Cheng, P. Streng and J. Srivastava, that visited Bangladesh in June 1983. This project is accorded higb priority in GOB's Annual Development Program (ADP).
Agricaltural Performance and Policies
1.03 Agriculture dominates Bangladesh's economy, providing about 57% of GDP, 75% of employment and more than 80% of exports. Out of a total land area of 35 M ac, about 22.5 M ac are under cultivation at an average cropping intensity of'140%. Rice is the leading crop with about 80% of cropped area; Jute and wheat account for about 5% each, and the balance is made up of a variety of other crops, such as pulses, oilseeds, tobacco, fruits, vegetables, and sugarcane. -2-
1.04 Foodgrain production,mainly rice ard wheat, increased during the last decade, but still does not meet domestic requirements,necessitating substarntial imports. In the past six years, domestic production increased from 13.2 M (FY78) to 15.1 M (long) tons (FY83). Foodgrain imports averaging about 1.5 M tons annually are needed to mainLain minimum acceptable consump- tion levels. Based on GOB's daily consumption target of 15.5 cz. per capita, 16.4 M tons of foodgrains (allowing 10% for seed, feed, and waste) were required in FY83 to feed the population of over 95 M and (at a population growth rate of 2.6%) 16.8 M tons would be required in FY84. Reflecting this situation, the Medium-Term Foodgrain Production Plan, prepared with IDA assistance, and the Second Five-Year Plan (SFYP, FY81-85) gave top priority to increasing domestic production to 20 M tons by FY85. Halfway through the Plan, indicationswere that this target was too ambitious,and the revised Plan aims to produce 17.5 M tons of foodgrains in FY85.
1.05 Since there is little possibility of expanding the arable land area, increased foodgrain production can be achieved only by intensifyingland use and raising crop yields. Programs to increase intensitiesand yields have encountered a varieLy of physical, socio-economic,institutional and finan- cial constraints. Widespread poverty in rural areas limits investments for required agricultural inputs and on-farm development. Average holdings are 3.5 ac and are fragmented into 6-10 parcels. About 25% of farm families own less than one acre, and about 17% of all land is sharecropped. Small and marginal farmers pay dearly for tenure and credit, and have poor access to government-supportedservices and inputs. About a third of the rural households own no land at all other than possibly their homestead, and about 50% are landless or functionallylandless owning less than half an acre. The percentage of the rural population below the poverty line (using a daily calorie intake of 2,100 as the poverty line) had increased from 65% in 1964 to 87% in 1977, and this trend has continued. Institutionalarrangements for providing agricultural inputs to the farmer, including extension, remain inadequate due to shortage of facilities and trained personnel. Access to most rural areas is difficult because of poor roads and slow water transport. 1.06 With IDA and other donor assistance,GOB is continuing its efforts to improve rural conditions and overcome production constraints. In addition to the major program of infrastracturedevelopment, of which water subsector development is the most importantpart, GOB has taken measures to strengthen supporting institutions,credit and input supply, and marketing as well as research and extension. Recent changes in agriculturalpolicy include: (a) greater reliance on the private sector for the distributionof irrigation equipment, fertilizers,and pesticides; (b) reduction of input subsidies; (c) increased procurement prices for foodgrains;and (d) increased availability and eased access to agriculturalcredit. -3-
ASicultural_SectorjProErms and institutir>nalArIane&ments
1.07 The two major water agencies in the agricultural sector are the Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) and BangladeshAgricultural Development Corporation (BADC). BWDB is charged with the responsibilityof planning, constructing, operating and maintaining all flood control and drainage schemes, and major and medium irrigation systems. BADC is mainly responsible for the minor irrigation systems, i.e., low-lift pumps (LLP), hand tubewells (HTW), shallow tubewells (STW), and deep tubewells (DTW). In addition, BADC has been the major supplier of fertilizer and seeds. Fol- lowing a policy shift towards privatizationin the late 1970s, BADC is now divesting some of its resposibilities. Fertilizer wholesale has been trans- ferred in part to the private sector while most of the retail distributionis handled now by private dealers and, to a lesser extent, cooperatives. BADC remains responsible for multiplication,storage and distributiorof certified HYV rice and wheat seeds. Pesticides are marketed by government licensed importers or manufacturers through authorized agents. Institutional lending for agriculture is directed and coordinated by the Bangladesh Bank (BB) and channelled through six nationalized commercial banks, the Thana Central CooperativeAssociation/Krishi Samabaya Samity (TCCA/KSS), administeredby the Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB) system and the cooperative banks. The Department of Agriculture Extension (DAE) under the Ministry of Agriculture and Forests provides extension services. DAE was established in 1980 through the consolidationof five previously independentagencies, i.e., Directorate of Agriculture-Extensionand Management; Directorate of Agricul- ture-Jute Production; Plant Protection Directorate;Horticulture Development Board; and Tobacco Development Board. Currently IDA finances the Extension and Research II Project (Cr. 1215-BD) to further improve extension effective- ness through adoption of the training and visit (T and V) system. It covers 15 of the country's 21 districts. The Bangladesh AgriculturalResearch Council (BARC), which was created under the Agriculture Research I Project (Cr. 828-BD), coordinates the agriculturalresearch activities of a number of specializedinstitutes covering rice, jute, sugar, foresty, fisheries, tea, livestock and other crops and horticulture. These instituteshave devoted substantialeffort to varietal development and cultural improvement.
Physical Features
1.08 Bangladesh is situated in the delta of three mighty rivers-- Ganges, Brahmaputra,and Meghna. Combined discharges from these rivers during flood stage may exceed 5 M cusecs. Loss of life, property and crops from flooding is excessive. Approximately two-thirds of the cultivable land (22.5 M ac) is subject to annual flooding, with one-half of this to a depth of over three feet. The delta topography is subdued and dissected by many unstable water channels.
1.09 The deltaic soils have been formed on deep alluvial deposits and are very fertile. These deposits typically range from silts and clays to sands. *.4-
Over much of the area, silts and clay predominate in the top 50 to 75 ft, with sands forming the major portion of the deposits at greater depths, particularly in the northern two-thirds of the country. Soils in the coastal fringe can be affected by saline inctirsiort during exceptional tides or years of low monsoon rainfall. There is generally no alkali problem, however, toxic acid sulphate soils occur in sttmall areas of Khulna district.
1.10 Logs from many hundred drilled wells show that almost all of Bangladesh'sdelta area is underlain by groundwater withiwater table depths ranging from zero to 30 ft, depending on location and season. Regardless of groundwaterdepth, the principal aquifer is hydraulicallyconnected with the rivers. During the monsoon, this aquifer is recharged by a vast increment of rainwater, which in turn is partially drained by the streams during the dry season. ExcepL for the fringe coastal areas affected by salt water intru- siotu,the quality of groundwater is generally good. Hence, there is an opportunityto devel.oplarge groundwater supplies on a sustained basis. 1/
1.11 The mean annual rainfall varies from about 50 inches in the western part of the country to about 200 inches in the northeast. It is charac- terized by wide seasonal fluctuations,with about 90% of rainfall occurring in the five-monthmonsoon period (May to September). In spite of an overall abundance of rainfall, serious droughts do occur. During the dry season, much of the land cannot be cultivated without irrigation. Water Subsector Development 1.12 Water subsector developmentwas initially guided by the 1964 Water Master Plan. This plan emphasized reducing flood damage, a major national objective at that time. It envisaged 50 major projects to be implementedby BWDB, which would provide flood control and drainage to 12.1 M ac and irriga- tion to 7.9 M ac by 1985. Total estimated project cost in 1964 was US$2.1 billion. The few projects initiated under the Plan ran into implementation and financing problems which resulted in stretched out constructionschedules and delays in achieving envisioned benefits.
1.13 Even though The Land and Water Sector Study (para 1.01) in 1972 called for a significantlydifferent program from the 1964 Master Plan, BWDB initially held to the view tha, its primary mission was to implement the high capital cost, long gestating, flood protection schemes envisioned in the 1964 Master Plan. About this time, however, GOB's agriculturaland water sector objective was shifting from flood protection to food production stressing low
1/ Bangladesh: Appraisal of the Shallow Tubewell Project, World Bank, Report No. 1373 a BD (June 2, 1977) estimated that about 4 M ac could be irrigated from groundwater. -.5-
capital Cost, quick yielding schemes such as LLPs, TWs, and smaller Irainage and flood control proj6cts located in the shallower flooded areas.
.1l4 At the time of the Joint GOB/Worl.dBank review of BWDB in 1979 (para I.C1), low capital. cost, quick-yieldingand high rate of return flood control and drainage schemes made up only 10% of the estimated cost of BWDB's port- folio. External aid to BWDB for these schemes was limited to the Early ImplementationProjects (EIP) funded by the Netherlands and a project funded by Canada providing structures and technical assistance associated with earthwork under the World Food Program's Food for Work (FFW) activity. The Joint Review Mission identified the cultivated acreage (about 15.0 M ac) with less than 3.0 ft annual flooding as the potential area for such schemes. GOB has emphasized these schemes in its SFYP. BWDB has revamped its portfolio accordingly,which now reflects the continuedEIP effort that has completed 44 schemes (covering about 400,000 ac); it has added projects such as the Small Scale Drainage and Flood Control Project (Cr. 955-BD) co-financedwith Canada (limited to installlng structuresassociated with FEW installed embankments in about 100 schemes covering 350,000 ac); Small Scale Irrigation Sector Credit, financed by the Asian Development Bank and European Economic Community (about 30 schemes covering 250,000 ac); and the recently approved IFAD-financedSmall Scale Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation Project, which will cover about eight schemes and 15,000 ac. Potentially, a sizeable area remains in Bangladesh for implementing these high priority schemes. In June 1973, about 3 M ac of agriculturalland were properly drained and protected from floods by BWDB projects. By June 1978. this area siad increased to 4.5 M ac and is targeted to reach 6.3 M ac by June 1985. GOB plans to increase the area mainly through low capital cost, quick yielding projects. BWDB's performance in execution of these projects has been satis- factory. Problem areas have been preparation of detailed designs and arranging easement rights in time to meet the constructionscheduile. These two aspects have been suitably addressed (paras 2.16, 3.01, and 3.07) for implementationof this Project.
1.15 With increased funding provided in GOB's ADP, the area covered by minor irrigation 1/ increased from about 1.0 M ac in 1972 to about 2.5 M ac in 1982. IDA contributed significantly to this growth by financing several minor irrigation schemes, namely Northwest Tubewells (Cr. 341-BD), Sh.allow Tubewells (Cr. 724-BD), Low-Lift Pump (Cr. 990-BD), Hand Tubewells (Cr. 1140-BD) and Deep Tubewells II (Cr. 1287-BD). In addition, IDA is supporting expansion of minor irrigation through rural development and agricultural credit projects. The SFYP calls for 7.2 M ac to be irrigated by the end of FY85. This program would require installation of minor systems serving 3.0 M ac during FY83-85. This target appears overly ambitious and probably will not be zmet. Even with current density of TW sitings, there are reports of TW
1/ Does not include about 1.0 M ac of traditional irrigation. -6-
interference with some RTWs and STWs going dry. Therefore, IDA has advised GOB to halt further installation of TWs in the few affected Thanas. Proce- dures and regulations to ensure appropriate TW sitings are under preparation, In addition, the Thana level irriga.ion maps are being updated to guide local officials in the efficient installation of TWs. Originally, all minor irriga- tion equipment was procured and installed by GOB, with the farmers paying a rental charge for its use. Following a GOB/Bank review of the Minor Irriga- tion Sector (April 1981), it was decided to shift major responsibility for this program to the private sector. STW and LLP rental schemes are being phased out with all rental equipment to be sold by June 30, 1984. Starting in FY83. TW sale prices have been set at full current replacement cost per- mitting private suppliers to compete with the public sector.
1.16 An Irrigation Management Program (IMP) was introduced in the Rtural Development I Project (Cr. 631-BD) in FY80 to maximize irrigation equipment utilization, minimize cost of operation, and to increase foodgrain produc- tion. Under this program, BRDB, BADC and DAE officers at district and Thana levels are jointly responsible to support TCCAs to carry out the following: (a) preparation of action plans; (b) organizing KSS meetings to explain the merits of better 'Aater management; (z) training of managers and chairmen of KSS, TCCA inspectors, village accountants, block leaders, fieldmen, and tubewell operators; (d) preparation of la_' maps and land registers; (e) laying of irrigation channels; (f) preparation of irrigaton budgets; and (g) obtaining production credit. Through FY82, IMP covered 43 TCCAs and 430 Irrigation units and on average increased command areas of these units by 53%, farmers participation by 35% and yields by 15%. Such promising results led GOB to decide to replicate this program on a nationwide basis. The current plan is to extend INP into 75 Thanas annually in four successive years and in each selected Thana have five IMP schemes per year. BRDB is responsible for monitoring IMP activities. The Rural Development Academy at Bogra has the training responsibility for GOB staff with assistance of a UNDF/FAO pxoject. IDA is supporting the IMP under both DTW II (Cr. 1287-BD) and Rur:;U Development II (Cr. 1384-BD) projects.
Programs to Strengthen the Bangladesh Water Development Board
1.17 The Joint GOB/Bank Review of BWDB (para 1.14) identified additional areas requiring attention in the water subsector. These included: (a) improving water sector planning; (b) strengthening the implementatLon capacity of BWDB; and (c) rehabilitating operating BWDB schemes. As a result, programs and projects have been planned or taken up that have begun to address these deficiencies. UNDP financed and the Bank served as execut- ing agency cn two projects, i.e. Improving Water Sector Planning (BGD/79/018) and Strengthening the Implementation Capacity of BWDB (BGD/79/040). Under the first project, revised planning procedures for planning water sector projects were prepared and adopted. Tlhese procedures addressed the problems of: (a) relating water sector schemes to national objectives; (b) identifying higher priority schemes; and (c) improving economic analysis. Also, this -7-
project prepared the terms of reference for a Water Sector Master Planning Program, which has resulted in another UNDP-financed and Bank-executed project (BGD/82/023). lhis three-year project was initiated in January 1983. Its major objective is to prepare a water sector master plan and develop a permanent Master Planning Organization (MPO). It is to contribute to GOB's Third Five-Year Plan (FY86-90) in the form of an agriculturally oriented project portfolio and a long-term framework plan for the period 1990-2005.
1.18 Strengthening the Implementation Capacity of BWDB project (BGD/79/040) proposed programs to: (a) establish a Member Operations and Maintenance (O and M) and a separate 0 and M unit at the eircle and divi- sional level in BWDB; (b) provide greater delegational authority to Zonal Chief Engineers and staffs; and (c) identify problems of deteriorated BWDB operating schemes resulting from deferred maintenance. GOB and BWDB have followed through or these recommendations as evidenced by the establishment of a Member 0 and M, additional delegations to field staffs, and assessing needs for rehabilitating operating schemes. This last item is being under- taken jointly by BWDB and MPO with funding to be provided by the Water Sector Master Planning Program (BGD/82/023). It will result in tenrs of reference for the preparation of the proposed BWDB Systems Rehabilitation Project, tentatively included in IDA's FY87 lending program. It is in this nation-wide project that major follow-up effort would be made to develop the mranpower and financial resources needed for the efficient and continued operatioal of BWDB's ongoing schemes.
Operation and Maintenance of BWDB Schemes
1.19 Inadequate funding in the revenue budget has been mainly responsible for the extensive deferred maintenance of BWDB schemes, which has resulted in inefficient operation and reduction in benefits. Available funds have generally been sufficient to cover establishment and operational costs only with little remaining for maintenance. In line with the programs envisaged in the project--Strengthening the Implementation Capacity of BWDB (para 1.18)--BWDB with the approval of the Irrigation, Water Development and Flood Control Division (IWDFC) in the Ministry of Agriculture plans to improve O and M by decentralizing the organization under its Member 0 and M. BWDB plans to commence a pilot program by establishing four C and M divisions beginning in FY85 (para 2.17). The staff of these divisions will devote themselves almost exclusively to improvement of system performance through routine and protective maintenance. Their planning and construction respon- sibilities would be limited generally to rehabilitation of operating schemes. A major constraint to the efficient operation of these pilot divisions is the paucity of ivailable funds. Experience from this pilot p:^ogram would be useful in formulating a nationwide strengthening of the 0 and M program. GOB is also planning to transfer the responsibility for 0 and M of small scale flood protection, drainage, and irrigation schemes to the Upazila (upgraded Thana) administration. Though -Lhe decision has been taken in principle, details have to be worked out (para 3.06). Cost Recovery
1.20 The growing number of irrigation projects which BWDB has completed over the past two decades has resulted in increaLsed 0 and M costs. To date, cost recovery from the beneficiaries has been practically nil. Hence, implementation and 0 and M costs continue to burden the Government's budget. Recently GOB has taken steps to commence recovery from the farmers. The Irrigation Water Rate Ordinance 1983 which was promulgated in July, 1983, provides for the imposition of water charges. Aelated rules and regulations were gazetted on January 11, 1984 (para 5.10). Water rates are to be adopted annually.
II. THE PROJECT
Location
2.01 Because several donors are financing similar projects (para 1.14), GOB on May 17, 1983, assigned districts in which such donor-financed schemes would be located. GOB made these district designations to simplify coordina- tion with donors and facilitate project implementation. Accordingly, this project would normally be located in the ten IDA/IFAD districts of Khulna, Barisal, Patuakhali, Jessore, Faridpur, Sylhet, Mymensingh, Jamalpur, Tangail, and Pabna (Map 17477). It would thus comprise many small agricul- tural areas distributed over almost half of Bangladesh. Generally, these areas have human, physical and climatic characteristics similar to the nation as a whole. Hence, the characteristics of the subprojects would be similar to those described in paras 1.08 to 1.11. Annex 2.1 gives climatic condi- tions in the areas of the four appraised subprojects.
Objectives
2.02 The project is consistent with GOB's target of seeking foodgrain self-sufficiency. Its objectives are to:
(a) increase agricultural production by: (i) adding areas under high-yielding Boro, Aman, and wheat through improved drainage or by providing irrigation; (ii) reducing crop losses from flooding by providing flood protection;
(b) alleviate some rural unemployment by emphasizing labor intensive construction techniques;
(c) support transfer of 0 and M responsibilities for completed small schemes to local bodies; -9-
(d) foster recovery of 0 and M costs from beneficiaries; and
(e) strengthen BWDB capability to carry out similar schemes, and to implement a "Pilot Decentralized 0 and M Program".
Project Description
2.03 The five-year project (FY85-89) would comprise (a) about 30 short gestating, low cost per acre, and high rate of return flood control, drainage, or irrigation subprojects and (b) means to strengthen BWDB's capacity for implementation of such schemes as well as to initiate a nation- wide 0 and M program for all BWDB projects '.hrough a Pilot Decentralized 0 and M Program. Among these subprojects would be a number that had been included in the recently appraised IFAD Small Scale Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation Project (Report No. 4463-BD) but had to be dropped because they could not be accomodated withia the limits of IFAD's available resour- ces. The subprojects would be selected in accordance with the agreed guidelines (para 2.04). The total number of subprojects to be completed would be flexible depending upor. their size and type. With the flood protec- tion measures envisaged, flooding cannot be totally avoided since rainfall would cause flooding when sluice gates are closed during high flood stage. However, the severity of such flooding would be significantly reduced, com- pared to "without project" conditions. Drainage schemes would be undertaken on lands with no flooding problems or combined with flood protection measures. Such schemes would permit adequate rainwater storage in depres- sions (beels) or drainage channels (khals) to meet planned irrigation and fishery requirements. Flood protection and drainage subprojects would be selected in areas where major projects are not planned in the foreseeable future. Irrigation schemes would be based on primary pumping from adjacent river channels or khals to a system of irrigation channels which would deliver water to farmers' fields by gravity. This would permit a second crop in the dry season. Farm ditches for distribution of water beyond the outlets of the channel system and farm drainage channels would be included under the scheme and detailed layouts would be prepared. Construction costs of these on-farm developments would be borne by the farmers. Assurances have been obtained during negotiations that in irrigation subprojects BWDB would design and lay out the farm irrigation ditches and farm drainage channels and, upon farmers' agreement to bear the cost of such construction as sell as of sub- sequent 0 and M, supervise their construction and synchronize completion of these on-farm developments with the completion of the main system. BWDB's capability to implement these schemes would be strengthened by providing technical assistance for feasibility studies, detailed designs, assistance in construction supervision, and training of staff, as well as procurement of limited construction, transport, and design equipment. The BWDB Pilot Decentralized 0 and M Program would be based on four divisions in different parts of the country. This pilot program would provide, after monitoring results over a five-year period, the necessary input for the nationwide 0 and M arrangements covering all BWDB projects. -10-
Criteria for Selection of Subprojects
2.04 The following guidelines (detailed in Annex 2.2) would be used by GOB and BWDB for selecting subprojects: (a) base costs of Tk 60.0 M (about US$2.4 M) or less;
(b) base costs of drainage and flood control subprojects of Tk 3,700 per acre (about US$150 per acre) or less;
(c) base costs of irrigation subprojects including field channels of Tk 10,000 per acre (about US$400 per acre--about US$250 for irrigationsystem and about US$150 for field channels) ox less;
(d) size of benefitted.irea for drainage and flood control to range between 2,500 and 20,000 acres, and for irrigationbetween 1,000 and 10,000 acres;
(e) flood depth in flood protectionschemes not to exceed 4.5 ft over 80% of the area, and river channel banks to be relatively free of bank erosion during flooding season;
(f) farmland in proposed irrigation schemes to be flood-freeand well drained; otherwise provision for flood control and drainage to be included;
(g) landholdir:gpatterns in the subproject areas would permit a large number of farmers to benefit; at least 70% of the farm families would operate holdings of three acres or less;
(h) maximum of two constructionseasons for completion of civil works;
(i) beneficiariesto indicate strong general support for the subproject and be prepared to participate actively In its implementation--includingproviding funds for on-farm development in irrigation subprojects--andsubsequent 0 and M1;
(j) subprojectproposals would be evaluated fully to determine their effect on adjacent areas;
(k) a subproject feasibilitystudy would review the entire infra- structure requirement of the area, I.e. flood control, drainage, and irrigation, as well as the fisheriesand water transport requirements. Works proposed under the subprojectwould be complete for the relief intended, and would incorporate existing or on-going works; completion of on-going works would be assured by the Borrower; and -ll-
(1) a subproject'seconomic rate of return would be at least 20%.
2e05 Subprojectswhich fully meet the guidelines could be started without prior IDA approval, but GnB would send the feasibilityreport to IDA. In the case of subprojectswhich may affect the flow of internationalstreams, IDA would not be able to finance such subprojectsunless there was beforehand an appropriateagreement among the countries concerned. When a subproject does not meet the guidelines fully, the feasibilityreport would justify its inclusion in the project and IDA concurrencewould be obtained before work is started. Assurances have been obtained from GOB that these guidelines would be used in selectingsubprojects.
Project Components 2.06 Project components reflecting the major subproject function inclulde: flood control and drainage (base cost---US$5.9M); drainage (base cost-- US$6.1 M); flood control (base cost--Us$8.4M); irrigation (base cost--US$10.7 M); and strengthening BWriB (base cost--US$10.9 M). The sub- project mix (eight flood control and drainage,about 64,000 acres; eight drainage,78,000 acres; six flood control, 59,000 acres; and five irrigation, 24,000 acres) used in the formulationof the project is based on a prelimi- nary list of BWDB-identifiedsubprojects. The number, type, and cost of schemes implementedcould differ somewhat, depending on viability and ultimate priority. GOB has engage6 a consulting firm (financedunder IDA Credit 1124-BD) to prepare feasibility studies for ten subprojects. Four feasibilitystudies were available at appraisal (para 1.02). The remaining six studies have recently been received by IDA. Of the appraised sub- projects, the Kangsha River subproject would provide flood control and drainage, the Kalaroa subproject drainage, the Bighai River subproject flood control, and the Chench-urisubproject irrigation. These four subprojects,as describedbelow, were used as typical examples to estimate overall costs and benefits of the project. (See Annex 4.1 for detailed cost estimateson appraised and unappraised subprojects).
2.07 Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage Subproject is located in Thana Purbadhala of MymeiisinghDistrict. This subprojectwould benefit an area of 28,640 ac of which 27,500 ac is agriculturalland. Groundwater availabilityis good, but only a snall area is currently irrigated from TWs. Farmers would be encouraged to use LLPs and STWs for additional irrigation, when their lands are drained and protectedfrom floods. Although the sub- project area is larger than stipulated in the guidelines, implementationis desirable since (a) investment for flood control is small due to existing road embankments,and (b) GOB attaches high priority to this area because of social consideraLions(benefitted population being about 83,000, and the number of farms 9,615). Flooding In the subproject area is typical of the flooding in the northern districts. Flooding of lowlands occurs from inade- quate internal drainage and overflow from rivers. Stages of Kangsha River -12-
and land elevationsin the subprojectarea are shown in Chart 25487. Early river floods are most damaging since Boro and Aus crops nearing harvest get submerged at that time. Later floods submerge Aman at the early growth stage, when long submergence cannot be tolerated. The subproject area is flooded by Kangsha (along the northern boundary), Mogra (close to the southern boundary), and Jaria (flows into the area from the west) Rivers. Flood depth is less than 4.5 ft over 80% of the area. Stream bank erosion is negligible.
2.08 An 11.5 mi long embankment.with gated sluices at interceptedkhals would protect the area against flooding from Kang6ha and Jaria Rivers. The latter river would be diverted to the Kangsha by reactivatingan old channel. Flooding from the Mogra River wculd be controlled by the existing road embankment,which would need to be raised in some sections and provided with gated sluices at khals. In all, this subprojectwould have seven controlled sluices allowing two-way flow to serve the needs of drainage, irrigation, and fisheries. About 29 mi of existing khals would be regraded to allow quicker evacuation of surplus rainwater when river water levels are low, and bring river water to the low areas for fisheries or irrigation. The subproject has about 8B0 ac of Beels. These wGuld be suitably drained for growing Boro paddy in the higher lands and developing fisheries in the lower areas. Farmers have agreed that provision would not be required in regulated sluices for passage of country boats. IBRD Map 17471 shows the proposed works. The subprojectbase cost is Tk 61.7 M. Cost per acre of agriculturalarea is about Tk 2,240 (US$90).
2.09 Kalaroa Drainage Subproject is located in Thana Kalaroa of KhuLna District. This subprojectwould provide drainage for 18,000 ac of good agricultural land. The topographyis relatively high and the adjoining Betna (western boundary) and Kapatakshi (located not far from the eastern boundary) Rivers do not cause overbank flooding, except in a small area where a short embankment is proposed. Stages of Betna River in Kalaroa and the elevation of the Jands in the subproject are shown in Chart 25486. The two rivers are influenced by tidal variation. During the low flow period, water becomes saline in the Betna River but Kapatakshi River supplies remain sweet. Back- flow of saline water into the khals and beels affects the suitabilityof water for irrigation.
2.10 Drainage works to be installed would allow storage of rainwater for irrigationin interior beels and khals. By increasing the carrying capacity of khals, flood damage would be reduced and gated sluices would protect farmland from contaminationby saline Betna River water. Planned improve- ments would allow admitting sweet Kapatakshi River water into the khals and beels for irrigation. Irrigation service from groundwater is not feasible due to low annual recharge and the danger of salinity intrusion into the aquifer. The works proposed are 0.75 mi of embankment to stop bank overflow, 14.5 mi of regraded khals, 9 sluices with gates for water control, and 11 bridges to provide all-weather crossings of the khals. IBED Fap 17472 shows -13-
the works proposed. After completion of drainage works, farmers would be encouraged to organize LLP user groups. The subproject base cost is Tk 32.3 M. Cost per acre of agriculturalarea is about Tk 1,790 (US$72).
2.11 Bighai River Flood Control Subproject is located in Thana Mirzagunj of Patuakhali District. This subprojectwould provide flood control to about 12,000 ac of good agricultural land. The area lies between the Bighai River (eastern boundary) and the Bish'kaliRiver (about 2 mi from the western bound- ary). Two khals connect these two rivers and form the northern and southern boundaries of the subproject area. Both rivers overflow their bank.sduring high tides. Chart 25485 shows the stages of the Bishkali River (Bighai River stages are reported to be similar) and elevation of the subproject area. The salinity of the water remains low for most of the year and farmers have been using river water for irrigation.About 120 cusecs are currentlypumved from the khals for irrigation in Mirzagunj Thana.
2.12 Embankments are needed for flood protection. An existing road embankment prevents flooding from the northern khal. An embankment along the 1ishkali River is under construction(earth work under FFW and structures under IDA Credit 955-BD). This improvementshould be completed by the end of 1984. The area benefited by these works does nc- include the Bighai sub- project area. Embanknientsof 9.5 mi along the B..ghai River and 3.5 mi along the southern khal are proposed to complete flood protection for the sub- project area. The Bighai embankment would have eight gate-controlledsluices at khals to permit drainage of surplus rainwater at low tides and allow river water for irrigation into the khals during high tides. Iiiaddition, 10 pipe outlets would be provided to allow drainage of small areas interceptedby the embankment as well as to allow river water to be used for irrigation. IBRD Map 17473 shows the works proposed. The subproject base cost is Tk 41.7 M. Cost per acre of agriculturalarea is about Tk 3,470 (US$139).
2.13 Chenchuri IrrigatIon Subproject is located in Thana Narail of Jessore District. The subproject would provide irrigation to about 1,900 ac by lifting water from the adjacent Chitra River. Chenchuri is a large beel area (46,000 ac) where flood control and drainage measures are nearing completion under the Drainage and Flood Control Project (Cr. 864-BD). Irrigation is limited to about 1,900 ac since: (a) availabilityof water for irrigation of larger areas still remains to be established by collecting discharge data of the adjacent rivers;
(b) developmentof a limited area would test institutional arrangementsenvisaged for 0 and M of the irrigation system and the on-farm water management program; and
(c) experience from this subproject would provide the basis for implementingreplicable schemes. -14-
The availability of surface water required by this subproject has been checked from liaited records on Chitra River flows. The quality of this water is good. It has been generally established that there are no down- stream users of Chitra water who would be adversely affected by withdrawal for this subproject. Irrigation from groundwater is not considered desirable due to possible intrusion of saline water into the aquifer and the need to preserve fresh groundwater for domestic use.
2.14 The irrigation system would comprise three primary pumping stations. Each station would have a vertical diesel pump with a capacity of about 25 cusecs. Pump house and equipment wculd be protected from flooding by the exieting flood protection embaikment. The pump sump would be connected to the river by a pipeline. The lumping static head would be about 14 feet. Though electric power is available in the town of Narail, diesel sets are preferred since electric power service could be erratic due to system break- downs. Studies indicate that both electric and diesel installations have about the same net present value at 12% interest. Each pump would feed about 1.5 mi of main canal and branches, which would be brick lined. Outlets would be about 2 cusecs and the watercourses would be unlined. Division boxes, field turnouts and other structures, including those for water measurement, would be installed. Field ditches are estimated at 7.4 mi per pump. They would be constructed by farmers at their cost under supervision of BWDB. The farmers' fields are already developed into small basins for paddy cultiva- tion. Initially little additional land shaping would be required. IBRD Map 17474 shows the layout of the irrigation system. The investment base cost of the system, without field channels, is about Taka 14.3 K (US$305 per ac), and the cost of field channels about Taka 5.6 M (US$119 per ac). The base cost for the whole system is about 6Z higher than the guideline recommendation. liowever, the subproject is strongly supported by BWDB officials, and it has been accepted to permit fuller development of the Chenchuri Beel area. The subproject should generate farmcr support for irrigated agriculture and could lead to replicated schemes in the area after the availability of water is better documented.
2.15 Strengthening BWDB Implementation and 0 and M Capacity would be in two areas, (i) that required for planning, design, construction, and 0 and M of the small and simple subprojects included in the project; and (ii) that needed for a Pilot Decentralized 0 and M Program, comprising four BWDB divi- sions. GOB with external assistance has recently taken various steps to strengthen BWDB. Further actions are envisioned in two projects, i.e. Water Sector Master Planning and proposed BWDB Systems Rehabilitation Project (paras 1.17 and 1.18). To strengthen BWDB's capability to implement this project and future projects of a similar nature, the project would provide: (a) technical assistance for preparation of feasibility studies and designs; (b) technical assistance for construction supervision; (c) training of BWDB's project personnel; and (d) construction, transport, and office equipment. -15-
2.16 Analysis by the appraisal mission indicates thet field staff associated with the Zonal Chief Engineers generally have the capaclty to implement the simple subprojectsenvisioned in this project. Experience in Bangladesh with similar projects indicates that the main constraint to timely implementationhas been completionof feastbility plans and final designs for construction. The estimated technicalassistance (TA) requirementfor com- pleting required feasibility studies is about 24 man-months of expatriate anidabout 168 man-months of local experts. 1/ To overcome the design con- straint, BWDB has established a Design Cell in its Project Planning Schemes III Directorate and has posted part of the required staff (para 3.01). Detailed design of subprojectswould be the responsibilityof this cell, which would be assisted by about 36 man-months of expatriateand 800 man-months local experts. TA for constructionplanning and construction supervision is estimated at about 90 man-months of local experts. Annex 2.3 gives the consultancyrequirements for preparation of feasibility studies, detailed design, and constructionsupervision. Assurances have been obtained from GOB that the consultantswould be in place by January 1, 1985. For the evaluation of the project's impact, separate local consultantswould be employed (para 3.08). Training of BWDB staff would include workshops, semi- nars, and visits to similar projects. The program would include centralized workshops at Dhaka for senior staff, regional seminars for field staff on the pattern of the on-going program under the Small Scale Drainage and Flood Control Project (Credit 955-BD), and overseas training in specializedareas. GOB would submit a training program to IDA for review. Experience with similar projects also indicates that provision of a limited quantity of transport and constructionequipment is required for project implementation. Transport equipment would increase the mobility of supervision staff, while some constructionequipment of a general nature would create a pool to supply any subproject, as well as to address situations arising from the unexpected breakdown of contractors'construction equipment. (See Annex 4.1, Table 5, or detailed cost of TA, training, and equipment). 2.17 The project would provide funding for a Pilot Decentralized0 and M Program in four divisions in line with the program envisaged in the Strengtheningof the ImplementationCapacity of BWDB Project (BGD/79/040) (para 1.18). This program (para 1.19) would assign full 0 and M respon- sibility of all BWDB operational projects within a division to specific staff and would provide this staff with adequate funds to carry out their respon- sibilities. This divisional staff would comprise an Executive Engineer, subdivisionalofficers, and support staff, including pump and gate operators at the subdivisionallevel (para 3.03). BWDB has selected the Comilla, Satkhira, Rajshahi and Moulvi Bazar Divisions for the program because they cover a wide range of agro-climatic conditions and operating prolects, i.e.,
1/ Base cost--US$9,200per man-month for expatriate and US$750 for local experts. -16-
coastal embankment, drainage, gravity and pump irrigation. The project would provide required equipment, materials, and labor. Also, the project would provide a limited amount of technical assistance (about 4 man-months expatriate experts) to help the staff in planning and carrying out their assigned responsibilities. It is envisaged that implementationof this program would be staged with one pilot division becoming operational in FY85 and the remaining three in FY86. BWDBwould send IDA a detailed program of work for each pilot area showing the staff needed prior to posting of staff. Hence, the first program of work would be furnished to IDA by January 1, 1985 and the other three by July 1, 1985. An assurance to this effect has been obtained from GOB. Experience from the pilot areas would be reviewed during project preparation and would be a valuable input to the proposed BWDB Sys- tems RehabilitationProject, which would have as one of its objectives the nationwide strengtheningof BWDB's 0 and M program (para 1.18; see Annex 4.1, Table 5a for detailed cost of n.ilot 0 and M program).
Subproject Civil Works
2.18 Civil works under the subprojects wtuld involve small scale earth movement and simple structures. Earth movement would compr se construction of embankments for flood control, excavation of khals to improve drainage and storage capacity) and constructing irrigation channels. Earthwork of this type is done manually in Bangladesh, which is quite efficient and provides employment to the rural poor. The project would use the same technique, except for changing the specifications to include compaction by manually operated rammers (little compaction is done now though placement is done in layers and rlods are broken). The embankment slopes would be turfed and the top would be maintained as an unpaved road for light vehicles. Embankments would be designed to have about three feet free board for a 20-year frequency flood. The improvement of khal sections would be based orndisposal of a five-year frequency, five-day consecutive rainfall. Irrigation channels would be unlined except where-liningwould be justified by seepage considera- tions or high land costs. Structures would comprise gate-controlled sluices, bridges, irrigation distributioncontrols, drops, and pump stations. Con- crete is used for most structures. Experience shows that brick str-ucturesin the southern districts are vulnerable to deterioration from salinity. Sluice structures ,iavebeen standardized in Bangladesh with 5 ft x 6 ft openings, and the required number of vents is fixed by providing adequate capacity at 0.25 ft differentialhead. Foundation conditions for all structures would be carefully examined to provide safe designs. These investigationshave not been completed for the appraised subprojects except for a few works of the Kalaroa subproject where peat layers about six feet thick have been found in two cases. All civil works constructionwould meet current BWDB specifica- tions, which are satisfactoryto IDA. -17-
III* PROJECT IMPLEMENTATIONAND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
InstitutionalArrangements
3.01 BWDF would be the principal implementingagency, responsib'lefor the design, construction,^- and M of all project works. Through the concerned Member, BWDB would provide timely decisions and support for project implemen- tation. For the construction of irrigation and drainage ditches, the cost of which is to be borne by the farmers, IMP will provide necessary assistance. A Project Planning Schemes III Directorate (PPS III) has been established under the Chief Engineer, Planning I (see Chart 25490), which would be responsible for the coordinationof planning and implementation. A Director heads this oLganization. A design cell has been created within PPS III which has commenced preparationof detailed design. BWDB has posted two Deputy Di.ectors, four Assistant Engineers, two Draftsmen, and two Tracera to this cell. The local and expatriate consultants (paTa 2.16) would work with the design cell and assure the quality of designs. Currently, assistance is being given by the consultantswho prepared the ten feasibility studies; their contract is being extended up to December 31, 1984. A Committee appointed by the Bangladesh Planning Commission reviewed the capacity of the existing BWDB design organizationand the possibility of expanding it to undertake additional work in this Project. The proposed arrangement for preparing detailed designs is in line with the Committee's recommendationand is considered adequate. PPS III would be responsible for timely completion of investigationsand detailed designs, implementationof the project accord- ing to planned targets, and procurement of consultantsand equipment for strengtheningBWDB. The zonal Chief Engineers (CE), SuperintendingEngineers (SE), and Executive Engineers (EE) would be responsiblefor construction,0 and M, and financial control. BWDB's capacity to implement small schemes has improved in recent years and BWDB needs only limited help fox implementing the project. The project would help to further strengthen its implementing capability by providing: (a) local and expatriate consultants to assist in preparing subproject feasibility studies, detailed engineeringdesign, con- struction supervision,and evaluation of project impact; (b) training of technical staff; and (c) additional design equipment and transport vehicles (para 2.16). For the Pilot 0 and M DecentralizedProgram, BWDB would post one EE with required support staff (about 200) in each of the four designated divisions (para 2.17). Each division would be subdivided into three units headed by SubdivisionalEngineers. Administrativelythe staff would report to the concerned SE and zonal CE in the line organization (see Chart 25828), and technicallyto the Member 0 and M. This decentralized0 And M staff would be responsiblefor the management of all BWDB operating schemes located within their jurisdiction.
3.02 The Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) and BRDB would support the project through IP and other on-going extension, cooperative,and credit programs to assure additional benefits over and above those resulting from the creation -18-
of infrastructure(The subprojects consider the increase in production due to infrastructureonly - para 5.01.). This would be particularly important in those areas where flood control and drainage is envisioned, requiring com- plementary on-farm development and financing of LLPs and TWs for irrigation. In the subproject areas, GOB would make adequate provision for: (a) organization of Thana Central Cooperative Associations (TCCA) and/or other farmers' organizations;(b) credit to farmers for on-farm development and the pur',haseof LLPs and TWs, if required; and (c) strengthening the agriculturalextension service, wherever needed.
Coordinationat the National Level
3.03 The existing DepartmentalProject Evaluation Committee in the Divi- sion of Irrigation,Water Developmentand Flood Control (IWDFC) would coor- dinate project implementation. This committee is chaired by the Secretary IWDFC, and its members include Joint Secretary IWDFC, Chairman BWDB, and representativesof the National Planning Commission, External Resources Committee, Finance Division, and EstablishmentDivision. Assurance was obtained from GOB that representativesof other concerned depart- ments/agenciessuch as BRDB, BADC, DAE, Department of Fisheries (DOF), and Ministry of Local Government would be invited to participate in the commit- tee's meetings regarding the project. For this purpose, an adminietrative order would be issued by ItDFC by July 1, 1984. The committee would give final rpproval for the selection oE subprojects,assure adequate assis- tance/participationfrom all agencies, and resolve problems involvingpolicy issues that may arise during implementation.
Coordinationat the Field Level 3.04 To encourage active participationof the farmers at all stages of project planning and implementation,a Polder Committee would be established for each subproject. Such a Committee would consioL of the Chairmen of the Union Parishads where the polder is located, at least two KSS managers, the Upazila based support staff of DAE, BRDB, BADC, DOF, etc., BWDB's Engineer responsible for the polder area, and several farmers. In general, the Com- mittee would irclude 40% representativesfrom local bodies, 20% from coopera- tives, and 40% Government officials. This Committee would be headed by an elected official, e.g. the Chairman of the Upazila Parishad. The Thana Circle Development Officer (or the future Thana Commissioner)would act as Secretary. The Committee would be used as a forum to: (a) disseminateinformation on planning, implementation,0 and M of the subproject and seek farmers' reactions and consent; (b) seek the active participationof farmers in 0 and M of subprojects; * 19-
(c) discuss and oversee agricultural field demonstrations sthowing farmers how co adapt their cropping patterns and practices to reduced flood levels and expanded irrigation facilities; and
(d) take other necessary actions in support of the subproject's objectives and to resolve problems arising during implementation. Experierce with similar comnittees ("Embankment Comnmittees")under the El? (para 1.14) has generally been positive. Hence, a Polder Committee, as described above, would be establishedfor each subproject before finalization of feasibility studies, or before commencement of construction where feasibilitystudies are already completed. Procedures for Subproject Implemer.tation
3.05 BWDB would a4opt the following procedures for selection, evaluation, approval, and implementationof subprojects,,
(a) BWDB's field BEs wouli identify potential schemes (satisfyingthe criteria for selection given in Annex 2.2) in full consultation with the Chairman of the Upazila Parishad. The Polder Committee (para 3.04) would be.for-med immediately after the identification of a scheme and would approve the document (on an agreed proforma) giving the subproject concept, prepared by the EE for submission to the Director PPS III. (b) The Director PPS III would obtain approval of the appropriate authority for preparing the detailed feasibility study of the subproject. Wherever the identified subproject may affect the flow of internatio,.al streams, appropriate agreement between the countries concerned would be necessary if IDA financing is desired. Thereatter the field EEs would be responsible for all field surveys and investigations fer draft feasibilityplans and cost estimates for selected subprojects.
(c) Feasibilitystudies would be prepared by the Director PPS II and consultantsbased on data and plans supplied by field EEs. Alternativeswould be studied. Any departure from the selection guidelines (para 2.04) would be fully explained.
(d) Subproject feasibilityreports would be sent to IDA. Simul- taneously, acceptance of the subproject by GOB for implementation would be obtained when subprojects meet the guide,ines fully; otherwise IDA concurrencewould be awaited. Subprojectscosting up to Tk 5.0 M would be approved by the Chairman of BWDB. The Secretary of IWDFC on behalf of the DepartmentalProject Evaluation Committee would approve or arrange approval by the appropriate authority for subprojects wA'thhigner costs. -20-
(e) Finalizationof contracts for civil works would be the responsibilityof field EEs. These EEs would be responsiblefor layouts of works, constructionsupervision, and administrationof contracts. Assistance in specificationcontrol and planning of implementationwould be provided by PPS III and consultants. In case of irrigation subprojects,IMP would assure formation of farmers groups for each offtakes and arrange for availabilityof land, materials and labor for executing the on-farm development work under the technical supervision of the field EEs.
The implementationof the Pilot Decentralized0 and M Program would be the responsibilityof the Member 0 and M of BWDB. He would prepare the work program for each of the four pilot areas (para 2.17), arrange posting of staff, issue detailed 0 and M instructionsfor each scheme, determine requirement of funds and arrange allotment thereof.
Operation and Maintenance of Subprojects
3.06 Proper 0 and M of completedworks would be essential for continued protection against the risks of flooding and drought (in case of irrigation subprojects)to induce farmers to use adequate inputs to optimize production. BWDB is now responsible for 0 and M. All maintenance operations are labor-intensiveand are carried out through petty contracts. BWDB staff: (a) operate the sluice gates for draining surplus water or admitting river water into the khals, (b) run primary irrigation pumps, and (c) regulate offtakes for field channels. The decision to open or close gates on khals is generallymade by local Sluice Committees on which farmers are represented. Satisfactory0 and M has not been possible on water sector projects due to insufficientfunding and greater attention given by BWDB staff to construc- tion activities. GOB intends to make 0 and M of small sub-projects (as included in this project) the responsibilityof beneficiariesto be administeredthrough the responsibleUpazila, but details have yet to be worked out. This is a desirable approach towards 0 and M. Such transfer of O and M responsibilitywould, however, take time and until it is completed BWDB would continue to be responsible. To accelerate the transfer, assuran- ces have been obtained from GOB that a program for gradually turning over the O and M responsibilityof the subprojects to the Upazila administrationwould be prepared and furnished to IDA for comments by January 1, 1986. Assurances have also been obtained that adequate funds would be allocated for the 0 and M requirementsof the subprojects,wqhich are estimated to rise to about Tk 45 million by FY90. Meanwhile, in view of GOB's current financial constraints, the IDA credit would include some 0 and M financing (about Tk 50.0 M) during the implementationperiod (para 4.03 and Table 4.2). -21-
Implementation Schedule
3.07 The project implementation period would be five years (FY85 to FY89). Detailed designs for the first six subprojectB would be completed prior to the beginning of the FY85 construction season. Construction would start on these six subprojects in the first year, about eight in the second year, nine in the third year, and four in the fourth year. The construction season in Bangladesh extends from October to June. During the rest of the year, rivers are in flood stage and frequent rains create difficult construction problems. Since individual works are small and would be implemented under separate contracts, the status of final design for the first year's construction program is satisfactory. Land acquisition would be expedited through inter-ministry coordination. Land acquisition procedures allow taking over of land for starting construction pending payment of compensation. Physical possession of land can be taken soon after the notification for acquisition based on detailed design layout. BWDB has tAken steps to reallocate funds required for land acquisition for the first year's construction program. To assure commencement of implementation in October 1984, completion of detailed designs and land acquisition for the first year's subprojects would be a condition of credit effectiveness and assurances have been obtained from GOB that in the following years the necessary land would be acquired ahead of the respective construction seasons. The project implemention schedule is given in Chart 25587.
Monitoring and Evaluation
3.08 Discussions are underway between GOB, IDA, and UNDP regarding TA in support of central monitoring of development projects. Improved central monitoring is not likely to reduce the need for project level monitoring and evaluation; however, it is envisaged that central monitoring would increase emphasis on evaluation, which would be very desirable. Until such changes are introduced, ongoing projects would continue to have specific arrangements for monitoring and evaluation. For this project, monitoring of physical progress and related costs would be the responsibility of BWDB. The evalua- tion of the project's direct effects would be done by a consultant (para 2.16), whose first task would be to prepare a detailed proposal outlining how this would be done. This proposal would be reviewed by IDA before the con- sultant would proceed. Assurances have been obtained that GOB would furnish a detailed plan for carrying out project monitoring and evaluation to IDA for comments by April 1, 1985.
3.09 The Director PPS III would be responsible for coordinating the work of the various BWDB units and other agencies, and monitoring project progress. He would prepare consolidated annual work programs and budgets, detailing activities at each of the subprojects. These annual work programs and budgets would be submitted to IDA for review by May 31 for the next fiscal year. The Director PPS III would monitor project progress through monthly, quarterly and annual progress reports. These reports would include -22-
all relevant data on physical and financial progress together with reasons for deviations, if any, from targets set under annual work programs. Copies of the quarterly and annual reports would be sent to IDA within 90 days of the end of each reporting period.
3.10 The nositoring and evaluation of the pilot 0 and M program would be an essential c.sp*oent of the program. GOB would propose the methodology to be followed to determine the effectivenessand impact of the program, when presenting the work program of each pilot division. IDA would review the proposals and an agreed evaluation technique would be used.
IV. PROJECT COSTS, FINANCING, AND DISBURSEMENT
Project Coltp
4.01 Tie caato of the four appraised subprojects have been worked out on the bausi of detailed quantities included in the feasibilityreports (para. 2.06). Land costs vary from Tk 20,000 to Tk 40,000 per acre, depending upon proximity to towns and current developmentof the area. For earthwork relat- ing to flood protection embankments and excavation of khals, the quantities were determined from designs meeting the hydraulic requirements,based on recent surveys. Quantities of work involved in structureswere estimated from type designs, since foundation conditions are not yet fully inves- tigated. For the irrigation subproject, detailed surveys for the canal network have still to be done. Since eventual quantities could vary, a physical contingency of 10% has been added to total base costs. Administra- tive cost has iaee split into three parts, i.e., site preparationand plan- ning, detailed designs, and construction supervision. The costs of site preparation,plsanirig and design have been estimated on the basis of works involved while the cost of constructionsupervision is estimated to amount to about 10% of the civil works cost excluding cost of land. The unit rates for different items of work are based on local inquiries of prevalent rates as well as the senctioned schedule of rates for each district. The cost of the Pilot Decentralized0 and M Program is based on an average requirementof 200 staff in a division and about Tk 6.0 million annually per division for energy, nmterials, and labor.
4.02 Total project cost is estimated to be US$58.0 M, with a foreign exchangaecnmaoirnt of US$14.0 M or 24%. Estimates are based on mid-1983 prices, adfswted to the expected time of credit negotiations,and include US$2.7 M In taxee and duties. Price contingenciesare estimated as follows: years one to three, 8%; and years four and five, 7.5% for domestic inflation (based on the anticipated increase of agviculturallabor rates); and year one, 9.5%; year two, 8.7%; year three, 7%; and years four and five, 6% for internationalinflation. Details on project costs are given in Annex 4.1; a summary is in Table 4.1. -23-
Table 4.1t Cost Summary by Components
Tk Million US$ Million Percent of Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Dase Costs
Flood Control and Drainage 121.2 27.1 148.3 4.8 1.1 5.9 14.1
Drainage 107.0 44.1 151.1 4.3 1.8 6.1 14.4
Flood Control 166.8 43.6 210.4 6.7 1.7 8.4 20.0
Irrigation 198.3 69.7 268.0 7.9 2.8 10.7 25.5
StrengtheningBWDB 205.9 66.7 272.6 8.2 2.7 10.9 26.0
Base Costs 799.2 251.2 1050.4 31.9 10.1 42.0 100.0
Phys. Contingencies 79.9 25.1 105.0 3.2 1.0 4.2 10.0
Price Contingencies 220.9 73.5 294.4 8.9 2.9 11.8 28.0
Total Project Costs 1100.0 349.8 1449.8 44.0 14.0 58.0 138.0
Financing
4.03 The proposed IDA credit of SDR 40.2 M (US$41.5 M) vould finance 75% of total project cost net of taxes and duties. UNDP is expected to finance the TA and training (US$2.3 M). GOB and farmers would cover resaining project costs, including taxes and duties (US$14.2 M), with farmers bearing the cost of on-farm development comprising irrigationditches ad field drains. The source of funds for these investmentsby the farmers would be establishedat the feasibility stage. The approval of the Project Proforma by GOB and the fi;lfillmentof all conditions of effectivenessof the UNDP project document would be conditions of credit effectiveness. IDA would finance 0 and M costs of subprojects on a declining basis: 100% la the first year after completion,60% in the second, and 30% in the third year, which would average about 75,'of total 0 and M costs during the fiv*-year project period. For the pilot 0 and M program, IDA would finance 80Z of the actual cost of maintenance and operation. IDA would also finance, as retroactive financing, a portion of the cost of preparatorywork (para 3.07), iiwely the cost of investigations,surveys, and preparationof detailed designs for the first year's subprojects incurred between appraisal and credit signing, as -24-
only the on-going consultancy for feasibility studies and limited assistance in detailed design is financed under Cr. 1124-BD. This retroactive financiig would amount to about US$0.3 M (about 1% of the credit). The proposed flnancing plan is in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Financing Plan (TK Million)
IDA Share ExpenditureCategorL GOB Farmers IDA UNDP Total %
Investigations and Surveys - - 10.1 - 10.1 100 Land Aquistion 145.7 37.2 - - 182.9 0 Civil Works 39.3 41.8 594.2 - 675.3 90 Equipment 18.0 - 71.4 - 89.4 80 Technical Assistance and Training - - - 57.1 57.1 0 Engineering and Admin'stration - - 88.8 - 88.8 100 Recurrent (O and M) Costs (a) Subprojects 17.7 - 53.4 - 71.1 75 (b) Pilot Program 55.5 - 219.6 - 275.1 80
TOTAL 276.2 79.0 1037.5 57.1 1449.8 72
U.S. $ Equivalent (million) 11.0 3.2 41,5 2.3 58.0
Percent 19.1 5.4 71.6 3.9 100
Procurement
4.04 The project would require procurement for civil works, investigations and surveys, equipment, 0 and M, and consultants. Procurement procedures would be:
(a) Civil Works (US$27.0 M including contingencies) are relatively simple, mostly small and scattered. Procurement would therefore be unsuitable for international competitive bidding (ICB). Assurances have been obtained from GOB that contractors for civil works construction would be selected under LCB procedures acceptable to IDA. Contracts for earthwork would be awarded in reaches, while each major structure would generally have a separate contract. BWDB has recently decided to include the supply of construction materials in the contracts for structures. This is a departure from its earlier practice of supplying materials from BWDB stores. This new procedure is acceptable to IDA. The different types of gates needed for the structures would be included in the civil works contracts. For -25-
works costing the equivalent of US$150,000or more, tender documents would be sent to IDA for review before bids are invited, and bid evaluations before the contract is awarded. For all other works, bid evaluation repo.rtstogether with the contractswould be furnished to IDA before reimbursementis sought.
(b) Investigationsand Surveys (US$0.4M) work would be procured through force account as well as contract. BWDB staff would carry out topographicalsurveys. Collectionand testing of samples for necessary investigationswould be done either through force account or under contract awarded under LCB procedures acceptable to IDA.
(c) Equipment (US$3.6 M) is of two types: (i) primary pumping equipment for irrigation;and (ii) other (i.e., transport, office and construction)equipment. Spares amounting to about 0l of the equipment value would be procured with the equipment. Generally, all equipment would be procured folLowing ICB proceduresconsistent with the current edition of the "Guidelines for Procurement under World Bank Loans and IDA Credits". Details are given in the Procurement Schedules (Annex 4.2). For procurementunder ICB, a preference limited to 15% of the CIF price or the prevailingcustoms duty, whichever is lower, would be extended to local manufacturers in the evaluation of bids. Small off-the-shelfitems costing less than US$10,000 for each contract, which are needed urgently,may be procured after comparing prices from not less than three Independent suppliers in accordancewith procedures acceptable to IDA. Such procurementwould not exceed a cumulative total of US$50,000. Tender documents and advertising procedures for all ICB procurementswould be reviewed by IDA before issuance by BWDB, and bid evaluations would be reviewed by IDA before the contracts are awarded. Assuranceshave been obtained from GOB that all equipmentwould be procured following ICB and LCB procedures acceptableto IDA.
(d) Operation of completed subprojectworks would be done by BWDB personnel (until Upazila administrationtakes over) while maintenance of works would be done under contracts awarded following procedures acceptable to IDA. Operation and main- tenance under the pilot 0 and N program would also be carried out in this manner. -26-
(e) Consultants would be engaged for: (a) preparing feasibility studies of the remaining subprojects; (b) detailed design of works and constructionsupervision; as welL as (c) examining the impact of the project on production and social conditions; and (d) advising under the Pilot Decentralized0 and M Program. There would be two consultancy contracts; one for feasibility studies, detailed designs, construction supervision,and advlce for 0 and M, and one for evaluating the impact of selected subprojects. Assuranceshave been obtained from GOB that appointment of suitably qualified consultants would be in accordance with principlesand procedures described in the "Guidelines for the Use of Consultants by World Baak Borrowers and by the World Bank as Executing Agency", as published by the Bank in August 1981. 4.05 Procurement arrangements are summarized in Table 4.3 beLow:
Table 4.3: ProcurementProcedures (US$ million)
Procurement Method Project Element ICB LCB Other Total Cost lnvest igat ions and Surveys - 0.2 0.2 0.4 (0.2) (0.2) (0.4) Land Acquisition - - 7.3 7.3 Civil Works - 27.0 - 27.0 (23.8) (23.8) Equipment 3.6 - 3.6 (2.9) (2.9) Technical Assistance - - 2.3 2.3 Engineering and Administration - - 3.5 3.5 (3.5) (3.5) 0 and M - 13.9 13.9 (10.9) (10.9) TOTAL 3.6 27.2 27.2 58.0 (2.9) (24.0) (14.6) (41.5)
Note: Figures in parentheses are the respectiveamounts to be financed by IDA.
Disbursement
4.06 Disbursements from the proposed IDA, credit would cover: (a) 100% of expenditures for investigationsand surveys; -27-
(b) 94% of contract expendituresfor civil works;
(c) 100% of foreign expenditureson directly imported irrigation pumping, construction,transport, and design equipment, including spares;
(d) 100% of the ex-factory price of equipmentmanufactured within the country, or 65X of local expenditures (off-the-shelf);
(e) 100% of expenditure on administrationand engineering of subprojects during the construction period, which would be based on 12% of the contracted civil works costs;
(f) 100% of subproject 0 and M costs in the first year after completion,60% in the second year, and 30% in the third year; 80% of the cost of the pilot 0 and M program.
Full documentationwould be sent to IDA in support of withdrawal applications except for items (e), (f) and the portion of item (a) carried out by force account. For these three items, applicationswould be supported by certified statements of expenditure. The actual documentationwould be retained by BWDB at a central location and made available for review to IDA repre- sentatives on request. In addition, this documentationwould be subject to audit.
4.07 The estimated schedule of expenditures,over the five-year project period plus an initial year, the proposed allocation of the credit and schedule of disbursementsare given in Annex 4.3. The disbursementprofile for the subprojectisis essentiallybased on the experience of the Small Scale Drainage and Flood Control Project (Cr. 955-BD), modified to reflect the anticipated sequence of subproject implementation,and the assumption that disbursementsfor work done in a quarter would be completed in the next quarter. Disbursements against subprojects in the quarters ending March 31 and June 30 would be large, exceeding US$3.0 M in the second, third, and fourth year of the project. In the other two quarters, disbursementswould be about US$1.0 M. This pattern is due to concentrationof civil works in the six-month period from October to March. Disbursement for the pilot 0 and M program would be almost at a uniform rate.
Project Special Account
4.08 Project works are to be carried out by a large number of small con- tractors whose efficiency often depends upon the speed at which they receive payment for completed work. Payments are frequently delayed on BWDB projects due to the long time taken by the BWDB head office in transferringfunds to field EUs. Such delays mainly arise from lack of funds with BWDB. To remove this impediment, a Project Special Account (PSA) would be established,for the implementationof the subprojectSonly, in a Dhaka commercial bank into -28-
which periodic IDA payments would be made. This account would be simlilarto the revolving funds used under the IDA-assistedSmall Scale Drainage and Flood Control Project (Credit 955-BD) and Second Drainage and Flood Control Project (Credit 1184-BD). It would, however, be operated somewhat dif- ferently in order to meet the requirementsof: (a) prompt payment to contrac- tors for work done, (b) avoiding depletion of funds during the construction season (October to June), and (c) preventingthe build-up of large unused balances during the rest of the year. Each project year, the official(s) authorizedby GOB to operate the PSA would request IDA to deposit credit advances into the PSA amounting to three months' requirementson the basis of the agreed constructionprogram. Payments into the PSA would be made in such a way that the available balance would stay under US$3 14during the construc- tion season, correspondingto IDA's contributionfor various works under the project in a three-monthperiod, and under US$0.5 M during the remaining three months. GOB would submit withdrawal applicationsto IDA for the amounts drawn from the PSA within one month of their withdrawal. These applicationswould serve to record the utilizationof the credit advances, but no actual reimbursementwould be made into the PSA. Each withdrawal applicationwould be supportedby a statement from the bank in which the PSA is kept showing disbursementsmade during the preceding month and closing balance. Assurances have been obtained from GOB that in operating the Spe- cial Account BWDE would follow procedures satisfactoryto IDA. The opening of the account would be a condition of credit effectiveness.
Accounts and Audit
4.09 BWDB would maintain records adequate to identify physical progress and financial transactionsrelating to the project. Separate accounts would be kept for all expendituresfor which credit withdrawals would be made on the basis of statements of expenditure (para 4.06). Auditors acceptable to IDA would audit the project accounts each year. The auditors' report would be sent to IDA within nine months of the close of each fiscal year. The auditors' report would include an opinion as to whether the credit funds disbursed against statements of expenditurehad been used for the purposes for which they were provided. Currently, BWDB's accounts are prepared separately for each project according to Financial Handbooks and are audited by its internal Directorate of Audits and the Government Auditor. This procedure is satisfactoryto IDA. Audit reports on the accounts of on-going IDA projects do not point out any major deficiency in the accounting system. Assurance has been obtained from GOB that the accounting and auditing requirementsoutlined above would be met. -29-
V. PRODUCTION,MARKETING AND PRICES, FARM INCOME, COST RECOVERY
Production
5,0l The project would increase crop production on about 225,000 ac, which are now affected by flooding and inadequate drainage in the monsoon season and lack of irrigationsupplies in the dry season. The projected production levels would be achieved with existing irrigationequipment and without major changes in the availabilityof extension advice. Project works would create cropping conditionsthat would encourage beneficiariesto adopt improved farming practices, including shifts from broadcastingto transplanting paddy, use of high yielding instead of low yielding local paddy varieties, dry season cultivation,supplemental irrigation during the wet season, and the increased input use these changes would require. Without the project, only modest production gains are expected, resulting from small yield increases due to extension efforts and farmers' own initiativeto improve their cul- tivation practices. 5.02 Present and estimated future cropping patterns for the four appraised subprojectsare shown in Annex 5.1. All are dominated by paddy, and changes in paddy cultivationare the most important effect the project is expected to have. In flood control and drainage subprojects, 1/ where some irrigation equipment is already used, the main impact would be the introductionof T. Aman (HYV), followed by some expansion of T. Aus (HYV) and wheat cultiva- tion. In irrigation subprojects,farmers would be able to start dry season cultivationof Boro (IiYV)and grow T. Aman (HYV) with supplementalirrigation in the monsoon season. Cropping intensitiesare expected to increase from 138% at present to 163% in flood control and drainage subprojects,and from 133% to 166% in irrigation subprojects. 5.03 Expected yield increaseswith the project are moderate, not exceeding 10X for most crops (see Annex 5.2). Thus, the projectedproduction increases would result chiefly from shifts in cropping patterns and higher cropping intensities. Estimates of present and future crop production for the entire project are extrapolationsbased on the assumption that unappraised sub- projects would, on average, produce the same results as the four appraised subprojects. The incrementalproject production thus calculated is given in Table 5.1.
I/ Also covers drainage only and flood control only subprojects. -30-
Table 5.1: IncrementalCrop Production ('000 metric tons)
With Without Present ProJect ProJect Incr. (1) (2) (3) (2-3)
Paddy (L) 117.5 82.0 123.4 -41.4
Paddy (HYV) 106.0 252.4 111.3 141.1
223.5 334.4 234.7 99.7
Wheat 2.0 8.3 2.2 6.1
Jute 6.7 9.6 8.7 0.9
Oilseeds 5.6 8.4 5.6 2.8
Marketing and Prices
5.04 Foodgrain production still falls 10-12% short of domestic require- ments, necessitating imports which averaged about 1.5 M tons in the past few years. Therefore,marketing of the project's incrementalpaddy and wheat production is not expected to pose a problem. Much of the increase is likely to be absorbed within the producing areas. Surpluses would be handled by the traditionalmarketing system, which is well developed. Farmers could also use the Government's procurement system. The relativelysmall additional output of oilseeds and jute would also be absorbed without difficulty.
5.05 Crop prices in Bangladesh are largely determined by the supply situa- tion and vary significantlybetween locations and seasons, and between years. In an attempt to stabilize prices, GOB intervenes in foodgrainmarketing through its procurement operations,offering guaranteed prices for rice and wheat--so far with limited success. Market prices may substantiallyexceed official prices in periods of poor harvests, as in FY32 and the first half of FY83; conversely, they often fall below the procurement prices in times of fBvorable weather and high production, as in FY81, in part because of a shortage of storage facilities in the main procurement regions. In the absence of true farmgate prices, procurement prices have been used for paddy and wheat in the farm budget analysis. Prices of other crops and farm inputs are based on prevailing market prices. -31-~
Farm Income
5.06 Illustrativefarm budgets have beer prepared for a typical 3-acre owner-operatedfarm in a flood control and drainage and an irrigation sub- project for the present and the future with and without project. The crop- ping patterns are broadly based on the Kangsha and Chenchuri subprojects. A summary is given in Table 5.*; details are in Annnex5.2.
5.07 In a flood control and drainage subproject, net production value (in constant FY84 prices) of a farm is estimated to rise from Tk l0,960 to Tk 14,830 at full development 1/ (+35%), while without the project there would only be an increase to Tk 11,580 (46%). Net production value per man-day would rise from Tk 48 to Tk 56 with the project, and net production value per capita from Tk 1,890 to Tk 2,560. 5.08 In an irrigation subproject, net productionvalue per farm is projected to double from Tk 7,560 to Tk 15,130 at full development, ll whereas without project it would only increase to about Tk 7,830 (+4%). Net production value per man-day would rise from Tk 39 to Tk 58, and net produc- tion value per capita from Tk 1,300 to Tk 2,610.
5.09 The with and without project comparison shows that a farming family operating a 3-acre farm in a flood control and drainage sitbprojectwould have an incrementalannual income of TK 3,250. The 0 and M costs of the sub- project would amount to Tk 190 per farm, or about 6% of the incremental income. In an irrigation subproject, the incremental annual income of a family operating a 3-acre farm would be Tk 7,300. The subproject 0 and M costs, including energy charges for pumping, would amount to Tk 1,950 per farm, or about 27% of the incremental income. The family would also have to invest about Tk 10,000 for the on-farm development. Most of this is expected to be in the form of contributed labor and land. Even if they borrowed a portion of the amount, there would be sufficient incentiveto go for irrigation.
1/ Full development anticipatedin five years after completion of a sub- project. -32-
Table 5.2: Summary Farm Budgets (3 acre farm; constant FY84 prices)
Flood Control and Drainage Subprojects 1/ Irrigation Subprojects
With Without With Without Present Project Project Present Project Project
Cropped Area (ac) 4.15 4.9 4.15 4.0 5.0 4.0
Gross Production Value (Tk) 13,450 19,550 14,070 8,920 19,190 9,190
Input Costs (Tk) 2,490 4,720 2,490 1,360 4,060 1,360
Agrochemicals ( 540) ( 1,790) ( 540) ( 70) ( 1,470) ( 70) Net Production Value (Tk) 10,960 14,830 11,580 7,560 15,130 7,830
Paddy (L) ( 4,740) ( 2,560) ( 5,020) (5,020) ( 2,340) (5,270) Paddy (HYV) ( 5,650) (10,230) ( 5,990) ( - ) ( 9,590) ( - ) Wheat - ) ( 1,330) - ) ( 120) ( 530) ( 140) Jute ( 320) ( 340) ( 320) ( 400) C 430) ( 400) Oilseeds ( 250) ( 370) ( 250) (2,020) ( 2,240) (2,020)
Net Production Value (Tk)
Per Cropped Acre 2,640 3,030 2,790 1,890 3,030 1,960 Per iMan-day2/ 48 56 50 39 58 41 Per Capita 3/ 1,890 2,560 2,000 1,300 2,610 1,350
1/ Includes drainage only and flood control only subprojects. 2/ Of family labor. 3/ Average family size is 5.8 persons. -33-
Cost Recovery
5.10 Until the promulgationof the IrrigationWater Rate Ordinance 1983 (July 1983), farmers were required to pay water charges amounting to 3% of the gross value of production from irrigated lands. Although BWDB personnel prepared statements of farmers' payment obligations based on at-site estimates of productionvalue, actual collect4on was insignificant.GOB now aims to recover .he 0 and M costs of gravity irrigation projects only. The rules and regulationsunder the Water Rate Ordinance are acceptable to IDA. GOB proposes to charge the beneficiarieson the basis of crop areas irrigated, the applicable rates varying from season to season. BWDB would continue to be responsible for assessing payment obligations. The rates for the first year are expected to cover about 35% of 0 and M. A condition of credit effectivenesswould be that water rates have been set and come into effect at levels satisfactoryto IDA. The GoveruLnent(a) would gradually set water rates at levels sufficient to enable BV'DBto recover from the beneficiariesof its gravity irrigation schemes inereasing portions of the cost of 0 and M and (b) cause BWDB to improve its collection procedures,all in accordancewith a program satisfac- .y to IDA, with the view to recover the cost of 0 and M by July 1, 1900. A condition of effectivenesswould be that such a program had been furnished to IDA.
5.11 As for flood control and drainage subprojecta,GOB's current view, which is accepted by IDA, is that cost recovery is not feasible at this stage. While it is possible to determine aggregate benefits derived from such subprojects or average per acre benefits, it would be difficult to design and enforce a cost recovery scheme geared to farmer's ability to pay in a situation where they experience widely varying cutitvation risks, depending on the location and quality of their land. On the other hand, imposing charges based on average conditionswould not be equiteble. Since land values are likely to reflect differences in productivity,a betterment tax would be a more feasible means of achieving cost recovery in this type of subproject. However, due to the absence of an effective land taxation system in Bangladesh this alternative is not practicable at present.
5.12 The rules and regulations under the Water late Ordinance have been promulgated in January 1984. Assurances have been obtained from GOB that water rates on gravity irrigation systems and collectionswould be taised periodicallyto reach levels sufficient to finance increasing portions of an agreed 0 and M program for such systems in order to achieve full 0 and M cost recovery by July 1, 1990.
VI. BENEFITS AND JUSTIFICATION
Production and Employment 6.01 The project would raise crop production and farm incomes through improvementsin the water regime on about 225,000 ac. Over 80,000 farm families, or nearly 480,000 people, would directly benefit from the project. -34-
Their present per capita incomes of about US$70-100 eqiivalent compare with a rural poverty income level of US$110 (World Bank estimates) and a per capita GNP of US$140 (World Bank Atlas 1983). Incremental farm employment would reach about 5.9 M man-days at full development (project year 10 and later)--an increase of about 30% over the present situation. Demand for hired farm labor would more than double in flood control and drainage sub- projects and increase almost tenfold in irrigation subprojects,providing employment opportunitiesfor the 39,000 landless families who live in the project area.
6.02 The project is expected to have limited net effect on the environ- ment. Flood control subprojectswould have some adverse impact on: (a) soil fertility due to the elimination of soil nutrients brought by floods; (b) beel fishing due to lacking replenishment of fry and fingerlings;and (c) boat transporton khals due to constructionof sluice structuresat the confluence with rivers. Additional use of manure, periodic fingerling seed- ings, and load transfer from khsalboats to river boats would be necessary actions to offset these effects, which will involve only limited expense and the beneficiarieshave indicateda willingness to take. On the other hand, the environmentwould improve from the reduced duration of flooding, improved access and reduced damage to property. Drainage subprojects would have a beneficial effect by reducing areas with high moisture, thus lessening the adverse impact on human and animal health. Irrigation subprojectswould replenish groundwater,decreasing the possibility of wells running dry.
Economic Analysis
6.03 The economic rates of return (IRR) of the four appraised subprojects are shown in Table 6.1. Based on the assumption that on average the unap- praised subprojectswould produce the same results, the rate of return for the project as a whole is about 30%. At a discount rate of 12%, the assumed opportunity cost of capital in Bangladesh, the project's economic net present value would be Tk 1.26 billion (US$50.5 million). Economic benefits and costs have been valued in constant FY84 terms. The main assumptions underly- ing the economic analysis are as follows:
(a) Project Life: Thirty years, with full development reached in project year 10 (PY94).
(b) Prices: Farmgate prices for internationallytraded goods are based on the latest (July 1983) IBRD commodity price forecasts (Annex 6.1), while those for nonr-tradedgoods are based on domestic financial prices. It is expected that over the next few years Bangladesh will become a net exporter of urea. Therefore, an import parity price is used through 1990, and an export parity price for later years. Domestic prices and price componentshave been translated into border prices using a standard conversion factor of 0.83. -35-
(C) Project Costs: All subproject investment and 0 and M costs and the cost of strengtheningBWDB, except the cost of the Pilot Decentrali4ed 0 and M Program, have been taken into rccount. The estimates are net of taxes and allowances for inflation, but incl-udephysical contingencies. Crop production costs have been adjusted to reflect realistically the staggered occurrence of costs and resulting benefits. Local costs have been expressed in border Taka by applying a standard conversion factor of 0.83.
(d) Project Benefits: Benefits consist of expected incremental crop productiondescribed in Chapter V. In each completed subproject, projected changes in cropping patterns and yields would take about five years.
Table 6.1: Rates of Return of Appraised Subprojects
Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage 35% Kalaroa Drainage 40% Bighai River Flood Control 26% Chenchuri Irrigation 21%
Sensitivity and Risks
6.04 The sensitivity of the project to changes in benefits and costs has been tes'-edusing swit.:ningvalues as a measure. 1/ The rezults show that at a discoint rate of 12% (the assumed opportunity cost of capital) total costs could rise about 70% or total benefits fall about 40% without making the project economicallyunacceptable. At a discount rate of 20%, the return required by the guidelines for subproject selection, the scope for changes in total project costs or benefits is of course less ample, but still quite comfortable. The same holds for three of the four appraised subprojects. Details are in Table 6.2. Further tests show that with costs up 20% and benefits down 10%, or with costs up 10% and benefits lagged one year, the project's IRR would still be about 20%, while a three-year lag in benefits vould reduce it to 15%. Economic benefits and costs are given in Annex 6.2.
1/ The switching value is the value of the variable tested for which the project's net present value is zero, or for which the project's rate of return (IRR) is equal to the discount rate (usually the opportunity cost of capital). -36-
Table 6.2: SwitchingValues of Benefits and Costs (%)
Benefits Costs
Discount Rate 12%
Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage -46 85 Kalaroa Drainage -48 91 Bighai River Flood Control -38 60 Chenchuri Irrigation -30 42
Total Project -42 72
Discount Rate 20%
Kangsha River Flood Control and Drainage -33 50 Kalaroa Drainage -37 60 Bighai River Flood Control -18 22 Chenchuri Irrigat.on - 3 3
Total Project -26 35
6.05 Implementationdelays, particularlydue to land acquisition,are a risk facing the project. Therefore, land acquisition for the first year's constructionprogram (six subprojects)would be a condition of credit effec- tiveness, and assurances hove been obtained from GOB that in the followqng years the necessary land would be acquired ahead of the respective construc- tion seasons. Another risk is that subprojectswould be undertaken without the full support of the population concerned. To minimize this risk, the subproject selection guidelines require that beneficiariesindicate strong general support and be prepared to participate in implementationand sub- sequent 0 and M of subprojects. Moreover, the IDA credit would include 0 and M funding (on a declining scale), and assurances have been obtained from GOB that adequate budgetary provision for subproject 0 and M is made during implementationas well as in the post-projectperiod.
VII. AGREEMENTS REACHED AND RECOMMENDATION
7.01 Assurances have been obtained from GOB that:
(a) in irrigation subprojects,BWDB would design and lay out the on-farm irrigationand drainage system and, upon farmers' agreement to bear its cost, supervise its construction (para 2.03; Sec 3.07 (a) DCA); -37-
(b) BWDB would apply the guidelines for the selection of subprojects given in this report (para 2.05; Sec 3.02 DCA);
(c) consultants for feasibility studies, detailed design and construction supervision would be in place by January 1, 1985 (para 2.16; Sec 3.03 DCA);
(d) a program of work for the first of the divisions in the Pilot Decentralized 0 and M Program would be furnished to IDA by January 1, 1985, and programs for the three remaining divisions by July 1, 1985 (para 2.17; Sec 3.08 DCA);
(e) representatives of other agencies concerned with project implementa- tion would be included in the meetings regarding the project of the Departmental Project Evaluation Committee within IWDFC (para 3.03; Sec 3.09 DCA);
(f) a program for gradually handing over the 0 and M of completed sub- projects to the Upazila administration would be furnished to IDA for comments by January 1, 1986, and GOB would allocate adequate funds for the 0 and M of subprojects (para 3.06; Sec 4.02 (b) and Sec 3.01 (b) DCA);
(g) the necessary land acquisition for subprojects to be implemented in project year two and later would be completed ahead of the respective construction seasons (para 3.07; Sec 3.06 DCA);
(h) a plan for carrying out project monitoring and evaluation would be furnished to IDA for comments by April 1, 1985 (para 3.08; Sec 3.05 (c) DCA);
(i) procurement of: (i) all civil works would follow LCB procedures acceptable to IDA, and (ii) equipment would follow ICB or LCB proce- dures acceptable to IDA; and (iii) consultants would be appointed in accordance with principles and procedures satisfactory to IDA (para 4.04; Sec 3.03 and Schedule 3 DCA);
(j) the operation of the Project Special Account would be acceptable to IDA (para 4.08; Sec 2.02 (b) DCA);
(k) accounting and auditing requirements stipulated under IDA credits would be met (para 4.09; Sec 4.01 DCA); and
(1) water rates on the gravity irrigation system and collections would be raised periodically to reach levels sufficient to finance an increasing portion of an agreed 0 and M program for such systems in -38-
order to achieve full 0 and M cost recovery by July 1, 1990 (para 5.12; Sec 4.03 DCA).
7.02 Conditions of credit effectivenesswould be: (i) completion of detailed designs and land acquisition for six subprojectson which construc- tion is to start in project year one (para 3.07; Sec 6.01 (c) and (d) DCA); (ii) approval of the Project Proforma by GOB (para 4.03; Sec 6.01 (e) DCA); (iii) fulfillmentof all conditions precedent to the effectivenessof the UNDP project document and it has been executed and delivered (para 4.03; Sec 6.01 (a) DCA); (iv) opening of the Special Account (para 4.08; Sec 6.01 Sec 6.01 (b) DCA); (v) setting of water rates at a level satisfactory to IDA (para 5.10; Sec 6.01 (e) DCA); and (vi) preparing a program satisfactoryto IDA for increasingwater rates and improving collection procedures (para 5.10; Sec 6.01 (f) DCA). 7.03 With the above assurances, the project would be suitable for an IDA credit of SDR 40.2 milliun (US$41.5 million) on standard terms. The borrower would be the People's Republic of Bangladesh. -39-
Annexes, Charts, Maps RANGLADFSH
liWfB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT
KANGCSPARIVER FLOODCONTROL AND DRAINAGE.SII;BPROD.JCT
Climatic Elements - Mymensingh
FLFEM.NT APR MAY JUNF. JUTLY AUCI SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR
Mean Rainfall 113 297 546 388 400 315 172 14 2 12 16 16 (mm)
Mean Max Temperature 33.8 32.4 31.2 31.3 31.3 31.5 30.7 28.7 26.4 25.2 27.6 32.0 (oC)
Mean Min Temperature 22.0 23.5 25.9 25.7 25.6 25.4 23.8 18.2 13.6 11.6 13.8 18.2 (OC) Mean Max Relative , h4umidity (X) 76 82 87 87 88 85 85 81 84 62 77 73 Mean Min Relative Humidity (%) 56 74 81 81 81 82 79 73 67 62 54 49
Average Vapor Pressure 25.4 29.7 32.5 32.A 33.0 32.4 29.0 22.2 17.2 14.5 15.9 20.0 (millibars)
Average Wind Speed 5.2 5.0 5,0 6.0 4.6 3.7 3.0 2.3 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.9 (kmfbr)
Cloudiness 1.1 1.4 1 .A 1.1 n.4 0 .8 0.4 0.4 0.1 n? n.5 0.9 (oktas)
Pan Evaporation 133 124 9fi 100 R3 94 q3 73 61 60 75 117 (mm)
I'a BANGLADESH
BWDB SMALL SCUEMES PROJECT
KALAROA DRAINAGE SUBPROJECT
Climatic Elements - Khulne
ELEIENT APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR Mean Rainfall 59 166 292 395 355 301 169 30 18 17 30 43 (mm) Mean Max Temperature 34.6 34.3 32.6 31.2 31.3 31.7 31.3 29.1 26.7 26.3 29.2 33.4 (oC) Mean MlinTemperature 24.2 25.6 26.1 26.2 26.2 26.0 24.3 19.1 14.7 13.6 16.1 21.0 (OC) Max Relative Humidity P (7.) 76 78 83 a6 85 83 78 72 72 73 71 73 Min Relative Humidity (*) 65 74 82 84 84 83 78 69 67 62 55 55 Average Vapor Pressure 30.0 32.6 34.Z 34.0 33.7 33.4 29.3 21.3 16.8 15.5 17.6 22.9 (millibars) Average Wind Speed 7.8 8.9 7.4 7.8 6.9 5.6 3.9 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.9 5.8 (kmlhr) Cloudiness 3.0 3.2 5.1 5.3 5.1 4.9 3.4 1.6 0.7 0.9 1.5 1.9 (okras) Pan E_aporatia u 154 172 103 98 80 89 93 85 74 78 92 136 (mm)
(ima)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WN t4 t4 I.- BANGLADESH
BWDB SMALL SCHE14ES PROJECT
BIGHAI RIVER FLOOD CONTROL SUBPROJECT
Climatic Elements - Barisal
ELENENT APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR Mean Rainfall 90 186 349 476 462 396 199 61 29 5 18 44 (mm) Mean Max Temperature 33.8 33.4 31.8 30.6 30.8 31.4 31.2 28.8 26.4 25.8 28.3 32.4
Mean Min(oC) Temperature 24.2 25.6 25.7 25.8 25.8 25.9 24.3 19.1 14.6 13.4 16.2 20.9 p
Max Relative Humidity (7a) 74 74 83 87 85 83 79 78 78 78 14 /4 Min Relative Humidity (%) 66 74 82 83 83 82 77 69 64 60 56 56 Average Vapor Pressure 29.5 32.2 33.6 33.3 32.9 33.1 30.1 22.6 17.6 16.0 18.3 23.9 (millibars) Average Wind Speed 8.4 9.1 8.9 9.1 7.6 6.0 3.0 2.3 1.9 3.5 4.3 6.5 (kmlhr) Average Sunshine 8.0 7.7 3.7 3.8 3.1 5.8 7.1 8.5 9.4 8.4 8.4 7.9 (hrs/day)
LD t% I-£ BANGLADESH
BWDBSMALL SCHEMESPROJECT
CHENCHURIIRRIGATION SUBPROJECT
Climatic Elements - Jessore
ELEMENT APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR Mean Rainfall 50 156 244 359 315 329 140 27 12 .12 11 41 (m) Mean Max Temperature 35.9 35.2 32.9 31.4 31.6 32.1 31.4 28.8 26.4 25.5 18.4 33.6 (oC) Mean Min Temperature 23.2 24.9 25.6 25.7 25.7 25.4 22.9 16.6 11.5 10.5 13.3 18.7 (oC) w Max Relative Humidity (Z) 75 79 85 86 88 87 84 80 82 81 77 72 Min Relative Humidity (X) 57 71 82 86 87 86 83 74 74 67 59 52 Average Vapor Pressure 27.6 31.8 33.6 32.8 33.8 33.3 29.3 20.8 16.0 14.8 16.5 21.4 (millibars) Average Wind Speed 10.2 10.9 8.9 7.6 7.0 5.4 3.3 2.4 2.8 3.2 4.1 6.5 (km/hr) Cloudiness 3.4 4.4 6.3 6.6 6.3 5.8 3.9 2.3 1.2 1.3 1.7 2.1 (oktas) Average Sunshine 8.9 9.7 4.8 5.1 5.7 5.9 8.2 9.3 9.4 9.1 9.5 8.7 (hrs(day) Pan Evaporation 153 152 114 97 94 85 83 74 63 61 79 128
_ -2 a U 3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- -44- Annex 2.2 Page 1
BANGLADESH BWDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT
GUIDELINES FOR SELECTION OF SUBPROJECTS
1. Location
In accordance with GOB's decision of May 17, 1983, the subprojects would generally lie in the districts of Jessore, Khulna, Barisal, Patuakhali, Faridpur, Pabna, Jamalpur, Tangail, Mymensingh, and Sylhet.
2. Area Characteristics
(a) Flood Control or Drainage
(i) The area under a subproject would generally be the entire agriculturalarea surrounded by the river channels, or a well defined portion thereof separated from the rest by an existing highway or other embank'ment.
(ii) The area would not exceed about 20,000 acres nor be smaller than about 2,500 acres. (iii) Flooding under average conditions would not exceed 4.5 feet over 80% of the area.
(iv) The rivers causing floods in the area would not be eroding the banks or tending to change course.
(v) At least 70% of the farmers in the area would be operating farms of three acres or less.
(b) Irrigation
(i) The lower and upper area limits would be 1,000 and 10,000 acres.
(ii) The area would already be drained and protected from floods. Otherwise, the necessary flood control and drainage would be provided. -45- Annex 2.2 Page 2
(iii) The subprojectwould benefit at least 500 farm families. At least 70% of the farmers in the area would be operating farms of 3 acres or less.
3. Scope of Works
The subproject scope would be to increase food production by protect- ing the area from flooding, draining the surplus rainfall, or providing water for the crops in periods of deficient rainfall. The works under the sub- projects would include embankments with control structures on the khals for protecting against bank overflow from the surrounding streams, excavation of khals for increased capacity for drainage, and primary pumping of irrigation water to irrigation systems delivering water to farmers' fields by gravity. Bridges on the khals and improvement of existing roads could also be included. The subprojects would not include drainage pumping, nor pumping water for irrigation from khals or from groundwaterby low lift pumps (1 to 2 efs), nor deep tubewells. The subprojectswould not include financing for agriculturalinputs and extension. However, GOB would ensure the provision of improved and adequate agricultural inputs through other programs.
4. Project Proposals
(a) The subproject area would be examined in detail for the infrastructurerequirements - flood control, drainage, irrigation,fisheries, and water transport. The sources of water available for irrigation would be established. Mleasuresfor flood control/drainageshould not cause majoe adverse effects on these sources. Storage of surplus rainfall in the depressions/khalsmay be necessary or facilities may be required to feed river water into depressions/khalsfor irrigation. The scope for reduction in fishing area (major source of livelihooe of unemployed rural labor) would be examined while establishingdrainage requirements. Facilities may be necessary for bringing fish from the rivers to the fishing area. Farmers would be contacted and the dislocation of water transport due to closure of khals and the availabilityor feasibility of alternative transport arrange- ments verified.
(b) Project proposals would assure (along with existing works wherever available) a complete solution of the particular infrastructure problem for which the solution is sought. Should part of the proposal comr- prise an ongoing work financed under another project, the completion program of this work would be verified to match with the subproject program.
(c) The proposals would not result in redundant structures conse- quent to future _.mplementationof medium/majorprojects In the area.
(d) The proposals would not cause significant adverse effects on adjacent areas. -46- Annex 2.2 Page 3
(e) The proposals would involve implementationof all civil and mechanical works within two constructionseasons. Works to be implemented at farmers' cost would be planned and supervised for completion in the same period. (f) The subproject proposals would be discussed with the farmers, local authoritiesand representativesof the Agriculture and other depart- ments specially fisheries. The farmers should be willing partners in the subproject and be prepared to execute the on-farm developmentsat their cost as well as to take over the operation and maintenance after completion of construction. The source of funds for the farmer's investments would be establishedand action would be taken to assure farmers access to these funds.
(g) The subproject proposals would involve minimum acquisition of land.
5. Cost Limits
(i) The base cost of the subproject (excluding physical and price contingencies)would not exceed the equivalent of US$2.4 million.
(ii) For flood control or drainage or combined flood control and drainage, the base cost would not exceed the equivalent of US$150 per acre.
(iii) For irrigation subprojects,the cost of the system including on-farm ditches for irrigation/drainagewould not exceed the equivalent of US$400 per acre (about US$250 for the irrigation system and about US$150 for the on-farm ditches).
6. Assessment of Benefits
The benefits would be determined by comparing future agricultural production "with" and "without" the project. The "without" condition would be based on about 3 years current production data, if available, and an assessment of possible future improvementswithout specific project interven- tion. Under the "with" condition, the production resulting from high yield- ing varieties, changes in cropping pattern including the effect of Increased use of agriculturalinputs would be considered attributableto the project. Where the subproject is based on completion of works in progress, benefits estimated under those works would not be included in the subproject benefits.
7. Economic Rate of Return
Minimum rate of return would be 20%. -4 7- Annex 2.3 Page I
BANGLADESH
BWDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT
SCOPE OF CONSULTANCYSERVICES FOR SUBPROJECTS
1. Concultants would be required to assist the Project Planning Schemes III Directorate of BWDB in:
(i) screening subprojects,identified by Field EEs for financing under the project, for meeting the guidelines and technical viability;
(ii) preparation of detailed feasibil4ty studies for the selectee subprojects;
(iii) finalizationof design criteria and preparation of detailed designs for works under the subprojects approved for implementation;and
(iv) constructionsupervision.
2. The consultant would preferably be a local consulting firm assisted by expatriate experts. Such experts would be seconded to the local firm by an internationalfirm of consultantswith Bangladesh experience, or competent individualswould be engaged. The former arrangementwould be preferred. In general, the consulting firm would provide the following specialists:
(i) Senior irrigation, flood control, and drainage engineer who would also lead the team.
(ii) Senior agriculturaleconomist (short period only).
(iii) Senior agronomist (short period only).
(iv) Senior design engineers with experience in flood estimation, foundation engineering,and hydraulic and structural design (number and period to match the workload). (v) Planning engineer.
(vi) Constructionengineers (number to match the workload). -48- Annex 2.3 Page 2
3. For screening the identified subprojects, the consultants would visit the subprojects, study the initial proposals made by the field EEs, consider alternatives, collect additional data, if needed, make necessary changes in the subproject scope to meet the guidelines and technical requirements, and recommend selection for preparing feasibility study. Should the initial screening indicate strong probability for the implementation of the sub- project, the consultant would assist field EEs in planning necessary surveys and investigations including fixing targets for completion of data collec- tion. Consultants would also prepare guidelines for feasibility level plans and estimates to be prepared in the field. Consultants along with PPS III staff would finalize the feasibility studies in sufficient detail to provide information needed for COB decision on subproject implementation and IDA review. For detailed design of works to be implemented, where the feasibility study was done earlier, the consultants would visit the sub- projects (already approved for implementation), examine the investigations done an' data collected, satisfy themselves that the proposed works provide the relief intended, and prepare design criteria to be adopted for detailed designs. The consultants would prepare design drawings along with the staff of PPS III, assure that design criteria are correctly followed and that drawings are of suitable standard and detailed enough to permit construction without the need of detailing in the field. For construction supervision, the consultants would assure availability ef reference points for control of alignment and levels. Quality control would be assured by enforcing con- struction procedure and inspection standards which would be watched by the BWDB field staff as well as by the consultant personnel during field visits.
4. The consultants would assure that the feasibility reports and detailed designs of the subprojects would be completed in time to meet the implementation schedule.
5. BWDB would provide the consultants with the following support:
Ci) All available data, contour maps, previous reports.
(ii) All hydrological records of the river stages, rainfall data.
(iii) Transport and office facilities.
6. In addition to the feasibility reports and detailed design reports, the consultants would submit the following:
(i) An inception report, one month after the starting date, detailing the work plan.
(ii) A monthly report on the progress of consultancy as well as physical progress of the subprojects.
(iii) A quarterly and annual report of physical and financial progress on the subprojects. UA1ESH OD SIAILSCEE PROJCT Table1. KAMESHARlvER FLOOD CONTROL ANDDRAINAGE IIROJIDT DetailedCost Table (Tk '000)
ParaAeters
Guantit BaseCosts PIs. ------kUnit- Cont.For. 6ross Smars Unit 0 1 2 3 4 5 Toal Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exch.Tax Rate Account
1- I.JESYNTCOSTS
A. IN!.ESTI5ATIONSMDSEYS LS - - - 312.3 156.4 52.0 - - - 520.4 0.1 0.2 0 IS B. LRNDACQUISITIOI ha 100 46 - - - - 14677.1 7h710.8 3,547.0 - - - - 11,257.8 0.1 0 0 LA C. CIUILMORKS
Eabankats 1000.3 - 450 326 - - - 776 10.4 - 4,687.7 3,396.0 - - 8.083.7 0.1 0.05 0 Ci Turtingot Slomes ha - 20 10 - - - 30 17.7 - 354.2 177.1 - - - 531.3 0.1 0.05 0 CU Excavationot Rhals 1000 3 - 386 386 - - 772 14.2 - 5,468.6 59468.6 - - - 104937.2 0.1 0.05 0 cu DivertingFlow ot Jaria Nadi 1000 3 - 74 - - - 74 14.2 - 1.048.4 - - - - 1.048.4 0.1 0.05 0 CU Bridie en Jaria Nadi(1) No. - - - - 831.7 831.7 - - - 1.663.4 0.1 0.4 0.05 ON Sluites m lba1s(7) No. - - - -- ,441.6 12662.4 - - - 21,103.9 0.1 0.4 D.05 ON Outlets in Egaents (6) No. - - - - 155.9 155.9 - - - 311.9 0.1 0.4 0.05 CU RaisingRod at Plaes 1000e3 - - 51 - - - 51 20.6 - - 1,051.9 - - - 1.051.9 0.1 0.05 0 Ci
Sub-TotlCIVIL U^S - 20,988,123,743.6 - - - 44,731.6 D. ENSIIEER1N16AD ADIINISTMTIN I
Site Preparationand Construxtion Plannirn LS - 312.3 - - - - - 312.3 0.1 0.2 0 EA Pearation at Designs LS - 101.6 23.5 15.6 - - - 140.7 0.1 0 0 EA Adeinistrationad Stwervisin - 32.8 2.220.1 2.498.5 - - - 4.751.5 0.1 0.2 0 EA
Sub-ToUlE1111EIRINIIS EDADNINISTRATION 446.6 2243.6 24514.2 - - - 5,204.4
Total INESTNENTCOSTS 8,469.726,934.8 269309.8 - - - 610714.2
II. RKi ET COSTS
A. CIVILk IS UIN
Edbaknt Repairs b - - -17.317.317.3 51.9 10.4 - - - 180.2 180.2 180.2 540.7 0.1 0.05 0 CO MhalIaintenance ka - 20 20 20 60 26 - - - 520.9 520.9 520.9 1,562.6 0.1 0.05 0 UD Bridge maintenace No. - I I 1 310.4 - - - 10.4 10.4 10.4 31.2 0.1 0.3 0 CO Sluice GateOtll No. - - 7 7 7 21 62.4 - - - 436.9 436.9 436.9 1,310.8 0.1 0.3 0 CUO Supervisimn,including Transrort LS ------114.6 114.6 114.6 343.8 0.1 0.05 0 CUO
Sb -Total CIVIL KSOU -N - 19263.0 1I263.01263.0 3,789.0
Total RECWNTCOSTS - - - 1263.0 1,263.0 1t263.0 3,78h.0
Total DASELIECOStS 8469.7 26,934.826,309.8 19263.0 19263.0 1.263.0 65;503.2
Jimmn 12. 15 16156 MI6ESH EDBSIIAL SCHEES PROJECT lable 2. KALARADRAINA6E DetailedCost Table ITk '000)
Parmaeters
guantits Base Costs Phs- - Unit Cont.For. Gross SuwTar tUit 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exch. TaxRate Account
1. WIESTiNCOSTS
A.INESIGATINS AND SURVEYS LS - - - -172.8 35.4 - - - - 209.20.1 0.2 0 IS B.LAND ACCUISITION ha 17 11.4 - - - - 28.4 52.1 895.7 593.9 - - - - 1,479.6 0.1 0 0 LA C. CIU!LVRS
EabankentClosures 10003 - 3 - 310.4 - 31.3 - - - - 31.3 0.10.05 0 CU Turting ot Slopes ha - 0.2 - - - - 0.2 17.7 - 3.5 - - - - 3.5 0.1 0.05 0 CU Excavationat Kbals 1i0 a3 200 153 - - - 353 14.2 - 2B833.5 29167.6 - - - 5,001.1 0.1 0.05 0 CN Iridges wI Control Sluice (4) NO. - - - - - Z,412.3 1973.7 - - - 4t386.1 0.1 0.4 0.05 Cv Sluices on lfOls (5) No.… … … … … … … …- 5,037.1 7,555.6 - - - 129592.7 0.1 0.4 0.05 CU Road Brid5s (11) i.… … … … … … … …- 2,618.8 2,618.8 - - - 5vZ37.5 0.1 0.4 0.05 Cv
Sub-TotalCIUIL VORIS - 12,936.4 14,315.7 - - - 27,252.2 D. ENGINEERINGANDADMINISTRATION
Site Prera,ation and Construction Plarmnin LS 312.3 - - - - - 312.3 0.1 0.2 0 EA U, Preparation ofDesigns LS 101.6 54.7 - - - - 156.3 0.1 0 0 EA Adainistrationand Supervision 18.1 1,362.0 1,503.2 - - - 2,993.3 0.1 0.2 0 EA
Sub-TotalENGINEERING MNDAmIINISTRATION 432.019416.7 1,503.2 - - - 3,351.9
Total IlNESTlENTCOSTS 1490.5 14,92.5 15,818.9 - - -32,291.9
II. RECIRRENTCOSTS
A. CIVILUWRS DIN
EsbarkentRepairs km - 1.2 1.2 1.2 3.6 10.4 - - - 12.5 12.5 12.5 37.5 0.1 O.05 0 CUD Khal Raintenance km -23.223.223.2 69.6 26 - - - 604.2 604.2 604.2 1.812.6 0.1 0.05 0 CUD Sluice Gate OIN No. - - 9 9 9 27 62.4 - - - 561.8 561.8 561.8 1,685.3 0.1 0.3 0 CUO Pridea Maintenance No. - 11 11 11 33 10.4 - - - 114.6 114.6 114.6 343.8 0.1 0.05 0 CiD Supervision, including Transport LS - - - - 93.8 93.8 93.8 291.3 0.1 0.05 0 CUD
Sub-TotalCIVIL WORKS DtH - - -1,386.9 1,396.8 1.386.9 4,160.4
Total REDIRRNTCOSTS - - -1,396.8 1l386.8 1,386.8 4,160.4
Total BASEI CSTS 1,490.5 140982.515,818.9 1396.8 1386.8 1,386.8 36Z452.3
Janrur 12# 1984 16:56 BANGLADESH BUDBSMhFLL SCHEI£S PROJECT Table3. SINUIRIIER FLOD CONTROtL DetailedCost Table (Tk '000)
Paraaeters
Quantita BaseCfz;s Unit ------Cont. For. Gross Sunats Unit 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exch.Tax Rate Account
1. INVESTIETCOSTS
A. INVESTIGATION4SANDSItVEYS LS 259.2 53.1 - - - - 312.3 0.1 0.2 0 iS S. LANDXCQUISITION ha 115.5 49.5 - - - - 165 77.1 8906.0 3B16.8 - - - - 12.722.8 0.1 0 0 LA C. CIVIL KIS
Eabaents 1003 - 344.4 229.6 - - - 574 10.4 - 3y5B7.7 2Y391.8 - - - 5979.4 0.1 0.05 0 Ci Turting of Slotes ha - 10.2 6.8 - - - 1717.7 - 180.6 120.4 - - - 301.1 0.1 0.05 0 CJ Sluices on Khals (8) Rn. …-- - - 79485.1119227.7 - - - 18,712.8 0.1 0.4 0.05 Cv Outlets in Ed,haaents (10) No. - 311.9 207.9 - - - 519.8 0.1 0.4 0.05 CU
Sub-Total CIVIL VORIKS -11565.3 13,947.8 - - - 25.513.1 D. EN6INEERIN6MDADlINISTRATICN
Site Preparation and Construction Planning LS 312.3 - - - - - 312.3 0.1 0.2 0 EA Preparation of Designs LS 72.9 31.3 - - - - 104.2 0.1 0 0 EA 4dwinistration and Sunrvision 27.2 1,219.9 1,464.5 - - - 70711.7 0.1 0.2 0 EA
Sub-TotalENlINEERING ANDADMINISTRATION 412.4;,251.2 1,464,5 - - - 3;128.1
Total INVESTMENTCOSTS 94577.616686.4 15t412.4 - - - 41.676.4
11. RECIMRDITCOSTS
A. CIVILilR1CS ON
EmbankentRepairs ka - -22.122.122,1 66.3 10.4 - - - 230,2 230.2 230.2 690.7 0.1 0.05 0 cWo Sluice Gate 0N No. - - - 8 8 8 24 62.4 - - - 499.3 4Y9.3 499.31.498.0 0.1 0.3 0 CUD Supervisiont includins Trawort LS ------93.8 93.8 93.8 281.3 0.1 0.05 0 CW
Sub-Total CIVILVMI(S 0Di -- --. 823.3823#3 623-3 2r469.9
Total RECIE(RENTCOSTS - - - 823.3 823.3 823.3 29469.9
Total BASEIINECOSTS 9,577.6 16486.4 15#412.4 823.3 823.3 823.344U146.3
Jaruarg 12, 1984 16:57 8AMOLADESHI ODBSn4LL S#IEIES PRMJECT Taoble4. CDENCRUIIRR16RIION Dotailed Cost Table (Tk '000)
Paraaeters
Ouantity BaseCosts Phy. ------Cont. For. Gross Sunar Unit 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Unit Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exch. Tax Rate Acount
1. INUESTfENTCOsls
A. I8OCSTI;ATIONSMND SWES LS - - - 2 91.4 72.9 - - - - 364.3 0.1 0.2 0 IS 8. LANDACQUISITION ha 6.8 15 15 - - - 36.9 104.2 703.3 1563.0 1,563.0 - - - 3,a27.3 0.1 0 0 LA C. CIVIL M088S
PuepHouses and Intakes LS ------275.5 336.8 - - - 612.3 0.1 0.4 0.uS CN Main and SecondarsCanals LS ------3238.6 3Y238.6 - - - 6,477.1 0.1 2 0.02 CW Structures on Canals LS ------409.1 409.1 - - - 818.2 0.1 0.4 0.cs CM Field Chanels andStructares LS ------1.524.7 1-524.7 - - - 3,049.4 0.1 0.15 0.05 Cm Drainage Ditdes LS ------178.7 170,7 - - - 357.3 0.1 0.05 0 CR
Sub-Totl CIVIL WORKS - 5,626.5 5.687.8 - - -11,314.3 J. EOUIP8EfT
Purs and Diesel Ensines ------16.5 1657.7 - - - 2,474.10.1 0.65 0.2 ED
Sub-Total EUIP1IEM - 816.5 1,657.7 - - - 2,474.1 E. ENGllEER1rANS AMINISMRATIOI 0
Site Preparation anoConstruction Planning LS ------312.3 - - - - - 312.3 0.1 0.2 0 EA Preparation ot Desisns LS ------54.4 34.6 9.7 - - - 09.0 0.1 a 0 EA Ad,inistratiaon andSupervision Ls ------30.6 684.2 771.3 - - - 1-486.0 0.1 0.2 0 EA
Sub-TotalEN6IERONE SAND AiNINISTRAIION 397.3 718.8 781.2 - - - 1,987.3
Total OOVSTKENtC35TS 1392.18,797.7 9,689.6 - 19,07,,4
II. RECIlOENTCOSTS
A. CIVIL WLS Ot8t
Pmphouse and Intake ainttance LS ------19.4 19.4 19.4 50.3 0.1 0.3 0 WO Canals and Structures Naistanance LS - - - 208.1 200.1 200.1 624.2 0.1 0.3 0 CR8 OperatinsgPersonnel LS ------3.8 *3.8 93.8 281.3 0.1 0 0 CB3 Supervision, including Transuort LS - - - - - 10.4 10.4 10.4 31.3 0.1 0.05 0 CWO
Sub-Total CIUIL VM(S 018i - - 331.7 131.7 331.7 995.0 B. ENIPIMENTOil
Spare andLuobricats LS ------036.4 36.4 536.4 2-50'.1 0.1 0.7 0.2 EGO UnepatimPersonnel LS ------87.5 97.5 0'.5 262.6 0.1 0 0 EOD Survisions including Iransport is ------.4 10.14 10.4 31.3 0.1 0.05 0 EC3
Sub-Total EaUIPIETcu - - 934.3 934.3 934.3 2,602.?
Total RL0NI COSTS - - -1,266.0 1,266.01,266.0 3,797.9 5
: =::--:--=:=-=--:: = =. Total AILIINE MTS 1,392.1 0-797.7 94819.6 1M266.01l246.0 1'266.0 23,677.3
Janar 12r ISB4 16:58 -53-
t3LAVESH Annex 4. 1 WDBUSMAL SCHE0MES PROJECT Table5. STRENGTHENING88D0 Detailed Cost Table ITk '000) Parameters
Ouantit.t Base Costs Phu. ------Cont, For. Gtross Sumoar Unit 0 1 2 3 4 5 lotal Unit Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exch.Tax Rate kAount
l. INVESTHENTCOSTS
A. EOUIPNLNT
1. CONSTRUCTIONEQUIPMENT
Concrete Nixers 7/10 ctt No. - 20 20 - - - 40 72.7 - 1454.8 1,454.0 - - - 24909,6 0.1 0.4 0.2 EO Concrete Vibrators 2 in No. - 40 40 - - - sO 14.5 - 581.9 581.9 - - - 101639 0.1 0.4 0.2 EC DevoaterindPusms 2 cts No. - 8 7 - - - 15 51.9 - 414.8 363.0 - - - 777.8 0.1 0.7 0.2 EO Wellnaint Suste No. - 4 - - - - 4 622.2 - 2,488.8 - - - - 2.488.8 0.1 0.7 0.2 EC Jetting Pumps No. - 4 - - - - 4 103.7 - 414.8 - - - - 414.8 0.1 7 0.2 ED Electric Oenerat,r No. - 2 - - - - 2 207.8 - 415.7 - - - 415.7 0.1 0.4 0. ECt 300 cts AirCosrrir.sors N4O, - 3 - - - - 3 829.6 - 2488.8 - - - - 2t488.8 0.1 0,7 0.2 EC PneumaticVib Compactors No. - B - - - 8 207.4 - 1658.2 - - - - 1.659.2 0.1 0.7 0.2 ED
Sub-TotalCONSTRUCTIOH E2UIPMEYT - 9,918.92i399.7 - - - 122318.6 2. TRANSPORTEOUIPtENT
1.5 ton Pickup Mo. - 8 - 8 285.2 - 2,28.4 - - - - 2,2B1.4 D.1 0.7 0.2 EQ 40 hp SpeedBoat 14 tt long No. - 6 - - - - 6 207.4 - 1,244.4 - - - - 1,244.4 0.1 0.7 0.2 EC 4-WheelDrive Vehicles No. - 5 5 - - - 10 259.3 - 1,296.3 1o296.3 - - - 2.592.50.1 0.7 0.2 EC 5-tor, Trucks No. 3 - - 3 456.3 - 2,36.9 - - - - 1,368.9 0.1 0,7 0.2 EC ticrobus No. - 2 - - - 2 259.3 - 518.5 - - - - 518.5 0.1 t.7 0.2 Lo Car 1300 cc No. - I - - - - I 311.1 - 311.1 - - - - 311.1 0.1 0.7 0.2 EC itotorencles 80 cc No. - 20 10 - - - 30 36.3 725.9 363.0 - - - 1,088.9 0.1 8.7 0.2 lO
Sub-TotalTRAISPERT EOUIPRENT -7746.5 1659.2 - - - 9.405.8 3. DESIGNEOUIPFENT
Furnitureand Drafting Tables LS ------228.8 228.8 114.4 - - - 572.1 0.1 0.3 0.05 EO Phatocopyingtachine No. - I - 1 363 - 363.0 - - - 363.0 0.1 0.7 0.2 EO Plain PaperPhotocopier No. - I - I 155.6 - 155.6 - - - - 155.6 0.1 0.7 0.2 EQ ElPeCtric lpewriters No. - 2 - _ 2 51.9 - 103.7 - - _ 103.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 EO ;ianunl Tmeuriterrs No. - 2 - - - 2 31.2 - 62.4 - - - - 62.4 0.1 0.4 0.05 EC ProgranableCalculators No. 25 18 5 - 40 2.6 64.8 25.9 13.0 - - - 103.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 EO Boas andPeriodicals LS - 62.2 41.5 - - - - 103.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 EO Amonia Printins tachine No. - I - - - - 1 363 - 363.0 - - - 363.0 0.1 0.7 0.2 EO
Sub-TotalDESION EGUIPttENT 355.9 1,343.8 127.4 - - 1.827.1
lSb-TotalEtUIPHENT 355.919,009.2 4,186.3 23551.43- B. TECE0ICAL8SSISTMICE
1. PREPARATIONOFFE6SIBILlIY STUDIES
Expatriat.es tt - 6 12 6 - - 24 233.4 - 1,400.6 2.801.1 1,400.6 - - 5,602.2 0.1 0.8 0 TA Locals so - 48 60 60 - - 168 18.8 - 900.3 1,125.4 1,125.4 - - 3,151.0 0.1 0 0 TA
Sub-TotalPREPARATION OFFEASIBILITY STUDIES - 2,300.8 34926.5 2525.9 - - 8,753.2 2. PREP6RATIONOFDESIGNS
Expatriates m - 6 12 12 6 - 36 233.4 - 1,400.6 2.801.1 2,801.11,400.6 - 8,403.3 0.1 0.8 0 TA Locals as - 180 IBO 180 180 80 800 1It8 3237,21 3.376.1 3,376.13,376.1 8.500.5 15004.8 0.1 0 0 TA
Sub-TotalPREPARATION OF[ESIGNS - 4776.6 6,177.2 6,177.24,776.6 1,500.5 239408,1 3. COXSTRCTIOA SUP6ERVISION ASSIoSTANE
Locals ma - 6 12 24 24 24 90 18.8 - 112.5 225.1 450.1 450.1 450.1 1,658.0 0.1 0 0 TA
Sub-Tot,alCONSTR[CTIOt SUPERVISION ASSISTANCE 112.5 225.1 450.1 450.1 ;50.1 1,688.0 4. ASSESSNENTOFIOPACT LS - 218.2 436.4 545-6 545.6 436.4 2,182,2 0.1 0,5 0 10
Sub-TotalTECNNICAL ASSISTANCE - 7,408.210,765,2 9s6,8.81P772.3 2,387.1 36,031.6 C. TRAINING
TraininaBIDB Project Personel LS … 778.5 892.3 802.2 802,3 882.3 802.3 5,190.1 0.1 0.7 0 TTt
Sub-TotalTRAININO 778.5 882.3 802.3 882.3 882.3 802.2Sl590.1
Total INEJSTIENTCOSTS 2,134.427299.8 15,833.810,581.1 6,65486 3;269.4 64,773.1 .. 2c2.. p,,= .. St-..=.o e,Dfl ,r.fl, r.c .*:.=f Total BASELINECOSTS 12134.427,299.8 15*823.8 10,581.1 6,654.6 30269.4 64,773.1
fd-r------15152 -- Fobr,jac20, 1984 15052 IYDI3WIL S S PROJECT Table s. S1EMIEIGN EMY D- PILOTDU PRM DetailedCost Table (Tk p00)
Para;sters
GuantitY BaseCosts Pht. -___-__-____-______-___- Cont.For. Sross Sumirs Unit 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Utit Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exd,. TaxRate Acoant
1. INMESTINTCOSTS
A. EhUIPMENT
1. TRANRlEhOUIPiNT
40 hp Smed Buitt 14 ftlor No. - 9 8 - - - 17 207.4 - 1,866.6 14659.2 - - - 3.525.9 0.1 0.7 0.2 EQ 4-WheelDrive Vehicle No. - 16 10 - - - 26 259.3 - 4,148.1 29592,.5 - - - 6,740.6 0.1 0.7 0.2 EU NItorni,le No. - 40 40 - - - 80 36.3 - 1,451.8 1,451.8 - - - 2.903.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 ED Biclse No. - 30 30 - - - 60 2.6 - 78.2 78.2 - - - 156,3 0.1 0 0,05 EO
Sub-TotalTRMIP T EUUIPWFNE - 7544.7 5.781.7 - - - 13.326.4 2. OFFICEEOUIPIflT
Photocotwi Wine No. 4 - - 363 - 1A451, - - - - 1,451.8 0.1 0J 0.2 EQ tll Tweuriter No - 12 - 12 31.2 - 3743 43 0.1 Q, 0.05 EU
*Total (FFICEElIJPIlET - 1,826.1 - - - - 1.826,1
S,b-TQtsl8IUIPiINT - 9,370.8 5781.7 - - - 15152.5 B. TECUKCALASSISTNCE
Expatriates _ -4 - - - - 4 233.4 - 933.7 - - - - 933.7 0.1 0.8 0 TA
Sub--TotalTEISNICML ASSISTYMCE - 933.7 - - - - 933.7
Total LWIESTENTCOSTS - i0,304.5 5,7S1.7 - - - 16,096.2
I. RSII§i 1
A. S7AFFO ELT,EC. mg - 18 S8 9D0DM 0 80 3,210 20.9 - 2M.4 16.672.8 11,72.0 16,72.0 16,672.8 M.U99.4 0.1 0 0 WD 1. NT9ALR, KI9Y, LA LS - - - 9,9.1 29,724.1 29,724.3 29,724.3 29,724.3 124,M.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 END
TotalREVRNT COSTS - lO,19,545,396.3 45g396.345,396.3 45,396.3 191,784.6
WIl MSlEN 05TS - 20003.*71W178,0 45376J3 45,30643 450396,3 207,870.8
febard 75, 15 10i;5 RODDSMALL SDiES JE.CT Tiole 6. WAA IShSFLOOD aMN1 ANDDRAING SMXCTS Betailed CostTable (Tk '000)
OCnt, Fot 6Ots 5urs ini, O 1 2 3 4 5 Total Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 lotal Rt Exch. Tax Rate kcont
A, PIy SIUW10E1s (2)
Investigations iw Surv- - - - 157.4 73.7 31.2 Q1.1 QZ 0 IS Land ALuAidtion ------49626.3 24128.4 - - - 6s7174, g,i o o Lu1 Civil harks ------1259.5 14P249.2 - - 26,839,6 0.1 0.23 0.03 wV Enr& eirid aid bdinistntion ------268.0 1346.1 1.509.2 - - 3P.23.3 0.1 0.19 e EA
Stota1 P1 SUFYIVRWTS (2) -5.091.6l6.159.7 B5OO9.6 - - 37P029.9 Bo MY SBMM (4)
InvestUiations O Survevs- - - 110.6 65.3 214 - 217.6W 0.1 02 0 iS Land Asition ------3- 24.3 1,483.4 - - 40707.8 0.1 0 0 LA £ CiVil Morks ------8772 S 17064 0.1 0.23 0,03 DI. Engineering no Asinistratin ------16.8 38.2 110,8 - 2'176.B 0.1 0.19 0 EA
b-Tot Pn2 sVPRZtTS 14) - - 34541.7 11.Z62.11,004.8 - 25Y808.6 C. %mS 1sti)
ImstiUtaiOO ad Survs - - - - 90.9 45.4 15.1 151.1 0.1 0.2 0 IS L4 Actuisitia ------29243.1 19032.0 - 31275.0 0.1 0 0 LA Civil larks - - --- 6u%% 6909.7 11tO1 0.1OA 0.23 0.03 Nd Eiznewrirn ad Abinistrtion------129.9 652.7 731.7 16514.3 0.1 0.19 0 Eh
Stb-TotaI PY3 S I0.CTS £1) _ _ - 2.463-87,834.4 7N655.5 17.693N.
Total IMFSTENTCOSTS - StOB1.6199700.4 294515.5 18.835.4 7.655.5 80,792.4
II. REWbTWMM
a. CIVIL vM osn
PYISubproiacts ------717.8 75718 1 1515.6 0.1 14 0 Cm PY2Subpojets ------528.2 528.2 0.10.14 v0 wa
SiToal CIVIL MS ^I- - 757. 1S256.0 2)C3.0
Total maEimSTS - - - - 757.8 t26 .0 2,043.8
Taal BPiLIE COSS - SYDO1.619,700.4 29,515.5 19.597.1 9,941.5 82rBU.2
Jawuarv12, 184 17:02 No SMIL S PRCT Table7. tWMALSO1RAINf SIOECTS et4ile CoestTable (Ti 00
Pamters
R atits 8OgeCosts Pbv. - - th______-MUnt - CoCt.For. Bras 59 bhit 0 1 2 3 4 S TotalCost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total hte Exch.Tax T mirt
I. 0SIENT 08S
a. ADDITITtWm SUIPROJCTS11)
Invrstzgatims WeASurvs ------1.2 10.7 - - - - 109.9 0.1 0.2 0 is Land uisiticn ------467.4 313.4 - - - - 7o.9 0.1 0 0 LA Civil Woaks ------6,.27.8 7,55i.6 - - - 14,393.3 0.1 0.34 0.04 I rn8inevrinsa inistration ------228.0 74.3 74.0 - - - 1,770.3 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Sub-total AMITICIMLPY SsNECTS /1) 786.7 7,908.2 8,349.5 - - - 17,044.4 B. PT1083I0tOES (3)
Inteatiuot s an s$ryws ------211.1 43.2 - - - 254.4 0.1 0.2 0 i5 Lnd *,isition ------1,082.6 725.9 - - - 1808.5 0.1 0 0 Ii Civil Works ------15,811.6 17,497.1 - - 33,308.7 0.1 0.34 0.04 a8 EnOirweringard fAinistration ------528.0 1,732.7 1,939.7 - - 4,099.6 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Si-Toal1 "m SL CTS (3) - 1,821.7 8,S313.719,335.7 - - 39,471.2 C. Pm2StLRECTS (2) ______U. Invstistimns arnSurve0s ------172.0 35.4 - - 208.2 0.1 0.2 0 iS Lanoesition ------.7 593.? - - 1,479.6 0.1 0 0 LA Civil Marks ------12,936.8 14,315.8 - 27-252.6 0.1 0.34 0.04 Cll EBr0w,inm mo Adinistration ------432.0 1,417.0 1-504.4 - 3.354.2 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Sub-Tatall SUFEROETS(2) - - 1,490.5 14,904.015,B20.2 - 32,294.7 D. PY3stWOECTs (1)
IlWstitions ad Smr's ------100.3 20.6 - 121.5 0.1 0.2 0 IS Lno fnuisittn ------516.6 346.4 - M63.10.1 0 0 1. Civil Uorks ------?546.s5- ,350.9 15,897.4 0.1 0 34 0.04 cm Lri,r,iri awd A4inistration - - - - 252.0 327.1 877.5 1.056.6 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Sab-Tatalm03 33R13ETsu (l) - - - 869,5 8i740.6 9M28.4 189083.5
Total CINESTEMTCUM 786.7 9,729.9 28,153.8 35,189.224,560.8 P,22s.4 107,648.8
11- T tIEtS
A. CIVIL km o314
mditi31 PM SrOt-7s ------731.9 731.9 731.9 2,195.8 0.1 0.15 0 C' PYI rosucts ------1,695.0 1,695.0 3,359.9 0.1 0.15 0 coo PT2Siroegts ------1,336.8 1,386.8 D.1 0.15 0 CUD
Sub-Totl CIVILliS tlU - - - 731.9 2,426.7 34813.7 6,972.5
TOtI F F CT - - - m71.9 2,426.9 3,813.7 6.972.5
ToUl MIE CTSM76.7 9,729.9 2BY1S3.835,921.1 26,917.7 13,042.1 114,621.3
JMv 12, IM1 103 B^SAH1AESI( BNDBSMALL SUNENES PROJECT Table8. UNAPPRAISEDFLOODCONTROL SUOPROJECTS DetailedCost Table (Tk '000)
Par3seters
Quantitv BaseCosts Phv. Unit ------Cont.For. Gross Suaarv Unit 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Cost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exch.Tax Rate Acount
1. IWVESPNTCUSTS
A. PYlSUB IWJECTS (2)
Invastigationsand Surves ------334.8 68.6 - - - 403.3 0.1 0.2 0 IS LandAcouisition ------11,503.6 4,930.1 - - - 16.433.7 0.1 0 0 LA Civil Works ------14,935.3 18,019.9 - - 32,955.1 0.1 0.31 0.04 CO Engineeringand Administration ------532.4 1,617.1 1.993.3 - - 4,042.9 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Sub-TotalPYl SUBPROJECTS (2) -12,370.8 21,551.119.913.1 - - 53.835.0 B. PY2SUBPROJECTS (2)
Investigationsand Surves ------291.6 59.7 - - 351.3 0.1 0.2 0 IS Landkicuisition ------10,019.3 4,294.0 - - 14i313.20.1 0 0 LA Civil orks ------13008.115,694.7 - 28,702.80.1 0.31 0.04 Cm Ensineer sg andAdministration ------463.7 1,408.5 1,649.0 - 3,521.3 0.1 0.19 0 EA ______- - -- Sub-TotalPY2 SUI9PROECTS (2) - - 10.774.618,770.3 17,343.7 - 46r88.6 C. PY3SUIR.ECTS (1)
Investisationsand Surves ------388.8 79.6 - 468.4 0.1 0.2 0 IS Landkcauisitin ------1359.0 5,125.3 - 19,094.2 0.1 0 0 Lk Civil Works ------17,344.220,926.3 38,270.5 0,1 0.31 0.04 Cl Engineeringaid Adinistration ------618.3 1,878.0 2,198.7 4,695.0 0.1 0.19 0 Ei
Sub-TotalPY3 SUBPROJECTS (1) - - - 14,366.125,027.1 23,124.9 62r518.1
Total INvESTENTCOSTS - 12,370.832.325.7 53,049.5 42,370.8 23.124.9 163t241.7
11. RECURRENTCOSTS
A. CIVILVORKS OtU
PTISubprojects - - - - 1-063.41,063.4 2,126.9 0.1 0.2 0 CUD PT2Subrojiects ------926.3 926.3 0.1 0.2 0 MD
Sub-TotalCIVIL WRKS 0IN - - - - 1,063.41,989,7 3,053.1
Total RECURRENTCOSTS - - - - 10463.41,989.7 3,053.1 x = _ =~______- Total BASfLINECOSTS - 124370.832,325.7 53o049.5 43P434.2 25.114.6 166,294.8
Jamar 12,1984 17:04 Annex 4.1. 0614AL SCHEMESP8OLCC Title 9. UNM'9AISEDIRNOIATION SUWIV.CTS Detailedcolt table ITt'000) Psaumter
Quantity ho. Costs 1w ...... LUnt------Coot.For, Gross Summary unit 0 1 2 3 4 5 Totaulcost 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Rate Exch.Tax R.t.Akouant
2. INWSTIIEHTCOSTS A. AD011y1114PYO SUIPRJECTS (1)
InvestigatiornaNW Suruva 433.3 108.3 - - - - 541,7 0.1 0.2 0 1 LandAeauisition -1. - -I045.6 2P324.62.324.6 - - 5694.7 0.1 0 0 LA Civil Wo'ks -8. - --- 6431.08.923.4 - - - 1707544 0.1 0.23 0,05 co Eouipunt ------b14141 2,465.0 - - 3,67n,o0.1 0.65 0.2 Ea Engin.etrinand Adairsistrotion------590.9 1.110,.51.211,6 W,21.0 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Sub-TotalADDITI114 PY0 StJI'QJECTS (1) 2 .09813,596,5 14.924,6 - - 30*590.9 I. PY1SUJSI)JECTS (1) InvhtitationsaNdSurveys------1,011.1252.8 1,263.80.1 0.2 0 is LandAnsuisition ------2t439.65.424.0 5,424.0 - 3P297.70.1 0 0 LA CivilWorks------20*605,820.821.2 - - 41,426.9 0.1 0.23 0.05 CU Eautowt - - - - ~ ~- - 2.832.9 5,751.6 - - 0,584.50.1 0.65 0.2 to Enginrfrintand Administration-. .- 1..l3)8.8 29609.82,827.2 - - 6,815.8 0.1 0,19 0 EA
Sub-TotalPYI SUBAOJECTS (ii 4,829.531M.252 34,824.0 - 71,378.7 C. PY2SUP1ROJECTS (11
Inm.tiUttimsand Surveys-n------1,2999 325.0 - - 1,624.9 0.1 0.2 0 is LmadAemisition, .- - 39136.66,973.7 6,973.7 - 17,064.10.1 0 0 LA CivilVork% -- - 16,1493.426,770.1 - 53,263.20.1 0.23 0.05 cU Esuipeat ------3.642.379395.0 - 11,037.2 0.1 0.65 0.2 E0 Eninwerinsand Administration-- -1.772.8 3,355.43,635.0 - 8,763.2 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Sub-TotalP92 SUW'RO.CTS (1) - - 9.29340.789.6 44,773.8 91,772.7 11.P93 SIJOROJECTS (1)
IrvastigationsandSurve-y-s------433,3 106.3 541.7 0.1 0.2 0 Is Landkwutnitior. ------1,045.629324.6 2,324.6 5,694.7 0.1 0 0 L.A CivilUotks ------8,831.00,923.4 17,754.40.1 0.23 0,05 CU Emuipuat - - - -- 1,214.12,465.0 3v679.0 0.1 0.65 0.2 EQ Enginterinsand Administration------590.9 1,118.51,211.6 2,921.0 0.1 0.19 0 EA
Sub-TotalP93 SCBJMRECTS CI - - 29069.8l3,596.5 14,924.6 30,590.9
TotalIKWSTIEMT COSTS 2.069.818.426,0 52.859.1 77,693.4 50,370.3 14,924,6 224,333.2
II. RECWARNICOSTS
A. CIVILVMS09 010 AdditionalPY0 SuWro,,bols------489.7 489.7 489.7 1,469.1 0.1 0.21 0 CUD0 P91Subprojects ------1.142.8 1,142.8 2,285.6 0.1 0.21 0 CU0 P92 Subproj,ects ------1,469.6 1t,469.6 0.1 0.21 0 CUD0 Sub-TotalCIVIL 11RK( 0DIN- 489.71,632.5 3,02.2 5,24.4 B. EQUIPMIENT0IM AdditiomalPYO S.jproJeets ------1.79.6 1,379.6 1,379.6 4,138.7 0.1 0.63 0.18 EGO PY1Subp.rojiects ------3,218,8 3,210.8 6,37.6 0.1 0.63 0.18 EGO P92Subpnoiects ------4,138.1* 4.138.1 0.1 0.63 0.18 EAO
Sub-TotalEQUIMENT0189DI - - - 137'9.6 1,598.38,736.5 14,714.4
Total01CURREIf COSTS - - - 1,869.36,230.9 11,83.6 19,938.7 tsr,.2. east.... sesas. asstm. Saloom=, Roo.asee omt,sete.'d Total3051.20 COSTS 2.069.018426.0 52P059,1 79,532.6 64,401.1 26.763.2 244,271.9 sett,,ats.., s..eveaestla,f ettetet essef,etn :t.eter.-
Jwmnur12. 19B4 27105 BAN3LADESH BUDDSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT SussarvAccount bu Project Component (RT'000)
Phusical Contingencies FLOODCONTROL STRENGTHENING AN BRAINASEDRAINASE FLOOD OWNIR)L IRRISGAION BUDD Total X Amount
I. INVESTHENTCOSTS
A. 1IIS¶INS ANDSURVE1YS 120l.B 902.1 1535.3 4y336.3 - 7s75.5 10.0 797.5 D. LANDACQUISITION 25,995.2 6,411.7 62,554.0 45,590.6 - 14551,510.0 14055.2 C. CIVILWORIS lQ3y2?0.9 1l1?094.l 125v441,6 141.513.3 - 48839.910.0 48,834.0 D. ENGINEERINGANDARINISTRATION 12,018.8 14.532.7 15,387.2 23,318.4 - 65,257.4 10.0 6,525.7 E. EOUIPfIENT - - - 29,453.9 39,703.9 69,157.910.0 6,815.8 F. TECHNICALASSISTANCE AND TRAINING
TECHNICALASSISTANCE - - - - 36;965.3 36,965.3 10.0 3,696.5 TRAINI$14S - - - - l5,190.151,1 10.0 519,0
Sub-TotalTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ANDTRAININ6 - - - 42,155.3 42vI55.310.0 4,215.5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~______TotalINVESTMENT COSTS 142,506.6 139,940.7 204.919.0 244,212.5 80,859.3 812,437.2 10.0 81Y243.7
II. RECURRENTCOSTS
A.CIVIL WORKS OGI 5,832.8 11,132.9 S,523.1 6,219.4 191,784.6 220,492.710.0 22,049.3 B. EIUIPIENTHIM - - - 176517.3 17t517.3 10,0 1751.7
Total RECURRENTCOSTS Ss832.8 11,132.9 5,523.1 23,736.7 19ls784.623B,009.9 10,0 23,801.0 Total BASELINECOSTS 148,339.41519073.6 210v441.1 267,949.2 272,643.91,050.447.1 10.0 105,044.7 Phvsical Contingencies 14YM33.9 15,107.4 21,044,1 26794.9 27,264.4 105,044.7 0.0 0,0 Price Contingencies 34Y861.0 40,913.8 5?9140.7 79,507.4 7??,2646 274,349.5 ?.l 26t751.0
Total PROJECTCOSTS 198;034.3207,094.7 290t625.9374,251.5 379W834.81,49,841.3 9.1 131,803.8
Taxes 3P607.6 6,585.7 6,712.9 22.744.2 27F155.5 66.805.? ?,1 6407.33 ForeignExchange 37,165.4 61,046.6 62,435.2 9972.5 89P452.4349822.0 9.1 31980.0 a x
Februars25, 1984 11'05 FORM ftO 1
PROCUAIMENT SCHEOULEFOR CIVIL WORKS CoulY BAN8GLADESH oroEVD3 SS1U SCM2S PRORCT
Kangsha River Flood Coutrol | , z and Draiaage SUbprmoject-"
Eaban1QBant9 & Divert-
ing Jaria L.C.B. 9.3 _|"m
Excavation of nhals
5 Contracts L.C.B 10.5 t I { 707hCCoetsscL5°>~~~~~APRM11 75 ;C*fis 9 !0m Sluices on ,hale and Outlets L.C.B, 20161 1 f I 7 Contracts
Bridge on Jaria , i 4 r 1 Contract L.C.B 1.6
RSL1t|||iIIiis I I I I2-a 1Contract L.C.B 1.0 f
Kalaroa Dralnage Subproject
Excavation of O(Ials _ --- and Emn anCTent L.C.B 4.8 EISEvTE --- I 2lucesontra isctsIMA SLuiceson ~ L.C.B 16.3 9 Contracts
Bridges L.C.B 5.0 -- 4 Contracts
A-ITITREFARATEN 0e PRIOUALIFIcATeON COLWEerS I mllTleTE PRmO,mT,CmIFCeTON5AKO DOtXtm$T , COmRCTmOmm n. ETE f e1mE T. I INTIAKUTEPFIAJAK. OTOF KI1DT514 ADt BDAt ;TCECOI'VA.CTO!01 fT ni INT F tfANOTE O"lTAZ>T _eeo C,-T NtAvaWFlOtlAEmAFLClF DCOASE 0 AOCAOII' TAtO M IDA TO 3Su?Anmsefmc*Tdrt*OmmlA. CLt5ACt O is.eeemnmst- -eCcsre- - OOmc me (SemmVCtmOe.fLeenmE etmtm^C
t'c'rLt- 00M lACMORAIcAJMCATt OACA oeNQaA,- EVALUATI.N e r0UsA. R.COME.OTVTO IDA- CCD O-WCFVWFrc. oUWWACOCTORlC e.,me LE OFOaeee.C.erme a-me. n.e.s~~~ e,sESE...e,maAerme-w PROCUREMENTSCHEDULE FOR CIVIL WORltS rw0$t BANGLADESH} ws8: 3WDBSPIALT SCEES RREiX
zTVC ;2 84 '9 85 s 86_
Bighai River Flcod F04 iControl Subproject 41
Embankments 4 Contracts L.C.B. 6.0 -
Sluices on Khals 8 1&l Outlets L.C.B. 18.5 .0$ B Contracts
Chenchuri Irrigation l O cW Subproject
Pumpl Houses and . Intak~esLC.0. 1 Contract
Main and Secondary 0002.1 1i 14 5 Canalv & Structures L.C.B. 7.4 I Contract A_L Structures on Field OPASAIL 5 8 91 Maonuals L.C.B. 1.6 2' I Contract
pa psAT scnomu rRG00RE52 EbT25 200.5000050* 302*3ZE a,Eamb.rE~a.- nmATE Ab10$T *OA.PCAOOCA,f Z 8 ItT ,Mrn*TESE aRrIon .sEtcro.s MOSIsOOcauIIas a CO*sruTAT rnCObPLSTE *.ffOT c nwErn0.vtOG JelvaWAoTImWInIJSIA I ¶0*5501T OttW,tM,00AsOO 02lOCwtEn¶sf3lOA '0 tO¶300UC1102%OaLEk -*.OCAtO O Es'rr ITRMICWOMBCOC ,RTlAt5 0* IOCLAR*,.FEC$CS55* 0t,A-OO* .n0 00 OCIAONfl 2 C0.StOsacrO.No fl00flr C-
* 0025 0102 0-a05AUeATINOWTICO rO rr1 TRemorEVALUATION slEst 550swAOREiOIEOc tOSO.wsoIoo oIA *-OEWesoOTRC0**00AFC*tlIOf 00* 0f $2 0.1*ITOlrvAuJTISElWuTat,or0tWOATION¶TO 0. , 5oaCtEARA1.Co OF qEwoNp.o.Iso C_CoO-caeMsRCO 0.t^Cra5* j ws $000 FORM NO. 1933
BourGtLADS0SESH _ PROCUREMENTSCHEDULE FOR EOUIPMENTANO MATERIALS OsT BB T, S ES PROEN
Pumping Equipment for 1. _. 24 4 15! GtnutnctiotI 9. 2C t Construction EquipmentI'L8It(Z43Nos.)~~~~~~~- 3 ;A7RetS .sE I- -I -IN!t I&2 1: & 8 Items (156 Nos.) ICB 11.9 - -- 4-- - transport Equipment - - 8 Items (243 Nos.) ICB 9 Design Equipment. Etc. _l " ij L IS Ttem (63 ?4s.) ICE 1.1 oot Furnicure, Books, etc. 0.7 OCB > RV-1~ -1- z v ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ADEVAU ATtA 2 Rns,s,cOCAr.ONSXV^T~ttA ,.r,O,es5"6OOOCuiEOTSrIOA t1OTto'sELiVDtSLSVR6ATSIIE COfETrItIT'E5fDc LCO-tOCAtCOOfEl?T.Vt b.RT TIIOOUIIR MTAW 0* 3 I0*CLEfAtANCtOP 5ftCIFCAT,ONAOO§OIOOOItUU'TS 5 II ^OINIOLIVEftVt L5TE Ooto 0-|AC=AO*MUW tfglCSOAOt_IflRtA I5!TATNOI98*S 0007 0 0_inmm Uc ATf We9t 0Ol0900RUli09DTD 05 EOTAlOAR £C&lAl>Sl PS-f0UD00'SOfiftOG 94* BANGLADESH BWDBSHALL SCHEOES PROJECT SumarYAccount bu Tise (Tk '000) Totals Includinr Contingencies 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total I.INVESTHENT COSTS A. INUESTIGATIONSANDSURVEYS 1,788.9 2.613.8 3,108.2 2.135.2 413.6 24.3 10,O84.1 B. LANDACOUISITION 22,586.0 37,893.6 44,207.3 49,927.1 24,553.5 3,740.9 8i2,908.4 C. CIVILWORKS - 79N815.2178,880,9 184,220.6 159,898.4 72,480.4 675,2?5.,6 D. ENGINEERINGAND ADNINISTRATION 2j874.412,184.9 23,814.0 23,406,8 18,468.8 89069.8 88,818.7 E. EQUIPHENT 408.7 36,598.822Y163.9 13,273.1 12,921.0 3,950.2 89,375.9 F. TECHNICALASSISTANCE AND TRAINING TECHNICALASSISTANCE - 9,983.0 13,986.013,581.0 8,659,7 3,839.6 50,049.3 TRAININ6 895.0 16060,2 1,153,0 1,243.8 1,329.1 1,414.8 7,O9Y.8 Sub-TotalTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING 895,0 11,043.115,139.1 14,824.8 9,988.7 5f254.4 57P145.1 TotalINVESTHENT COSTS 28,552.9180,149.6 287P313.5 287,737.5 226,304.2 93,520.0 1,103,627.' 11.RECURRENT COSTS A. CIVILWORKS DIH - 12.182.652,587.9 70,267.2 826563.4 95Y505.5 319.106.5 B.EQUIPMENT 081 - - - 3,266.6 8y339.0 15,501,5 27,107,1 Total RECURRENTCOSTS - 12,182.6 589587,9 739533.9 90,902.4 1114007.0 346,213.7 Total PROJECTCOSTS 28,552.9 192s332.2 3459901.3361,321.4 317,206.6 204.526.91i449i841 3 (D 2SX Februarv 25i 1984 11:04 -644- Annex 4.3 Table 2 BANGLADESH BWDB SMALL SCHFMF:S PROJF.CT Proposed Credit Allocation (Million) Percent of Expenditures Ca.tegory US$ SDR to be Financed 1 Civil Works 19.0 18.40 94% 2 Equipment and Spares 2.6 2.55 100% of foreign expenditures, 100% of local expenditures (ex-factory cost) and 65% of local expenditures for other items procured locally 3 Investigations and Surveys 0.4 0.39 100% 4 Administration and Engineering 3.0 2.91 100% v Operation and Maintenance a Subprojects 2.0 1.95 100% in first year after completion, 60% in second year, and 30% in third year b Pilot Decentralized Program 8.o 7.75 80% 6 Initial Deposit in Special Account (to finance items under category 1) 3.0 2.91 7 Unallocated 3.5 3.34 TOTAL 41.5 40.20 -65- Annex 4.3 Table 3 BANGLADESH BWDB SMALL SCHENES PROJECT Estimated Schedule of Disbursements (Million) Disbursements Per Semester Cumulative Semester Ending US$ SDR US$ SDR December 1984 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 June 1985 3.7 3.6 4.3 4.2 December 1985 1.5 1.5 5.8 5.7 June 1986 8.2 7.9 14.0 13.6 December 1986 2.0 1.9 16.0 15.5 June 1987 8.4 8.1 24.4 23.6 December 1987 2.0 1.9 26.4 25.5 June 1988 7.6 7.4 34.0 32.9 December 1988 2.0 1.9 36.0 34.8 June 1989 4.2 4.1 40.2 38.9 December 1989 1.3 1.3 41.5 40.2 -66- Annex 5.1 BANGLADESH BWDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJE.CT Cropping Patterns of Appraised Subprojects (acres) With Present 1/ Project Flood Control and Drainage Subprojects Broadcast Paddy (L) 19,030 ii,hoo TransplantedPaddy (L) 26,1L0 20,,L90 TransplantedPaddy (HYV) 27,170 51,210 - Aus (1h,630) (17,770) - Aman ( _ (21,940) - Boro (12,540) (11,500) 72,340 83,100 Jheat 830 2,090 Jute 3,760 3,760 Oilseeds 2,620 h,6oD Total Cropped Area 79,550 93,550 Net Area 57,500 57,500 Cropping Intensity (%) 138 163 Irrigation Subproject Broadcast Paddy (L) 1,540 150 Transplanted Paddy (L) 10 200 Transplanted Paddy (HYV) - 1,800 - Aus ( - ) ( 200) - Aman ( 800) - Boro ( - ) ( 800) 1,550 2,150 Wheat 60 80 Jute 150 150 Oilseeds 740 740 Total Cropped Area 2,500 3,120 Net Area 1,875 1,875 Cropping Intensity (%) 133 166 1/ Future without project assumed to be the same as present. -67- BNIGLADE8H Annex 5.2 3WDB SltALL SCRBEMSPROJECr Tsble 1 Illustrative Fars fudgiets - Flood Control and nrainage SubproJecta (3 Are Farm, Constant FY84 Prices) -- PrEsClt------.------Future witt Proje c- t---- Price Cropped Area -- uity__-_ Value/Cost Cropped Area ---- uantity---- Value/(0ost Unit (Tk) (ac) (kg/at 1/) (kig) (TO) (ac) (kg/sc 1/) (kg) (Tk) A. PRODnlCTION B. Aus (1.) Maund 144 .6 380 228 8Rn .S 420 210 811 T. Aus (8YV) .8 920 736 2,841 1.0 1,100 1,100 4,247 T. Aman (L) 1.2 800 960 3,706 .6 880 528 2,038 T. Aman (HYV) - - - - 1.0 1,150 1,150 4,440 B. AU., B. Anan 2/ .4 700 280 1,081 .1 730 73 282 Boro (WYV) .8 1,350 1 080 4 170 .8 1,620 1.296 5 003 Subtotal: Paddy 34284 I7 ,357 16,821 Wheat 132 - - - - .5 1,000 500 1,769 Jute 160 .2 5i30 116 496 .2 640 128 549 Oilseeds 230 .15 300 45 277 .2 330 66 407 1ll Crops 4.15 13,451 4.9 19,546 B. INPUTS Paddy (L) Seed kg 4 2.2 25.8 3/ 56.8 227 1.2 26.5 31 31.R 127 Mr ure ' .13 .6 200 120 IS .5 200 100 13 Laaor (hired) Kanday IR 1.2 10 12 216 .6 17 tO 180 Bullock Pairday 25 2.2 8.5 4/ 18.8 470 1.2 R.5 41 10.2 255 _- 575 Paddy (8YV) Seed kg 5 7.6 '9 30.4 152 2.8 19 53.2 2h6 Manure .13 .8 200 160 21 1.0 200 200 26 Urea Maund 148 1.6 40 64 254 2.8 59.3 166 f59 TSP 140 1.6 21 33.6 126 2.8 42.8 119.8 450 Potash (HP) 110 .8 S/ 9 7.2 21 2.8 18 50.4 149 Pesticide kg 330 1.6 .2 .32 106 2.8 .3 .84 277 Labor (hired) manday 18 1.6 10.5 16.8 302 2.8 18.5 52 936 Bullock Palrday 25 1.6 9.5 15.2 380 2.8 10 28 700 1,362 463 Wheat Seed kg 4.6 .5 50 25 115 Urea Maund 148 .5 50 25 99 TSP 140 .5 37 18.5 69 Potaah (HP) 1IO .5 18 9 27 Pesticide kg 330 .5 .2 .1 33 Bullock Pairday 25 .5 8 4 100 Jute Seed kg 53.6 .2 4 ' 8 43 .2 4 .8 43 M7anure .13 .2 375 75 10 .2 375 75 10 Urea Maund 148 .2 24 4.8 19 .2 24 4.8 19 TSP 140 .2 9 1.8 7 .2 9 1.8 7 Potash (HP) 110 .2 9 1.8 5 .2 9 1.8 5 Labor (hired) Manday IR .2 12 2.4 43 .2 20 4 72 Bullock Pairday 25 .2 10 2 50 .2 10 2 50 177 20_6 Oi lseeds Seed kg 6.7 .15 6 .9 6 .2 6 1.2 8 Manure *'.13 .15 200 30 4 .2 200 40 5 Bullock Pairday 25 .15 4 .6 1S .2 4 .8 20 All Crops Seed 4.15 428 4.9 559 Manure 1.75 385 50 1.9 415 54 Urea 1.8 68.8 273 3.5 195.8 777 TSP 1.8 35.4 133 3.5 140.1 526 Potabh (HP) 1.0 9 26 3.5 61.2 181 Pesticide 1.6 .32 106 3.3 .94 310 Labor (hired) 3.0 31.2 561 3.6 66 1,188 Bullock 4.15 36.6 915 4.9 45 1 125 2,492 t4720 C. IET PRODUCTION VALUE Paddy (L) 4,739 2,556 Paddy (lYV) 5,649 10,227 Wheat - 1,326 Jute 319 343 Oilseeds 252 374 I5;W,-fff1 4,826 Index 100 135 1/ Except for labor and bullock; converted fro. uaunda par acre at 37.3 kg per Saund. T mixed.M / 34 k4 for broadacrt. 19 kg for transplanted paddy. 8 pairdays for broadcast, 9 pairdays for transplanted paddy. SI Boro (8?tV) only. -68- BANGLADESR Annex 5. 2 818D0SMALL SCHEMHESPRo80Cr Illustrative Fare Budgets - Flood Control and Drainaeg Subprojects (3 Acre Farm, Constant FYR4 Prices) ------P ---- prel ent ------Fetture w ithout Project------Price Cropped Are Value/Cost Cropped Area - nttry- Value/Cost UInit (TR) (ac) (kg/lac 1/) (kg) (Tk) (nc) (kgtac 1/) (kg) (Pk) A. PRODUCTION B. Aus (L) M4aund 144 .6 380 228 S80 .6 400 240 927 T. Aus (mV) * . .8 920 736 2,841 .8 9h0 768 2 965 T. Avail (L) ' ' 1.2 800 960 3,706 1.2 840 1,008 3,891 B. Aus, B. Anan 2/ " .4 700 280 1,081 .4 730 292 1 .127 Boro (lIlYV) " .8 1,350 1,080 4,170 .8 1,420 1,136 4,386 Subtotal: Paddy 3.8 3,284 12,678 3.8 3,444 13,296 Jute 160 .2 580 116 496 .2 580 116 496 Oilseeds 230 .15 300 45 277 .15 300 45 277 All Crops 4.15 13,451 4.15 14,069 B. XNPUrS Paddy (L) Seed kg 4 2.2 25.8 3/ 56.8 227 2.2 25.8 3/ 56.8 227 Manure " .13 .6 20n 120 15 .6 200 120 15 Labur (hired) Manday 18 1.2 10 12 216 1.2 10 12 216 Bullock pairday 25 2.2 8.5 4/ 18.8 470 2.2 8.5 4/ IA.1l 470 Paddy (IHYV) Seed k. 5 1.6 19 30.4 152 1.6 19 30.4 152 Manure .13 .8 200 160 21 .8 200 160 21 Urea Maund 148 1.6 40 64 254 1.6 40 64 254 TSP " 140 1.6 21 33.6 126 1.6 21 33.6A 126 Potash (HIP) " 110 .8 5/ 9 7.2 21 .8 9 7.2 21 Pesticide kg 330 1.6 .2 .32 106 1.6 .2 .32 106 Labor (hired) Monday I1 1.6 10.5 16.8 302 1.6 10.5 16.8 302 Buullock Pairday 25 1.6 9.5 6/ 15.2 380 1.6 9.5 6/ 15.2 380 1,362 1 .36 2 Jute Seed kg 53.6 .2 4 .8 43 .2 4 .8 43 Manure " .13 .2 375 75 10 .2 375 75 10 Urea Maund 148 .2 24 4.8 19 .2 24 4.8 19 TSP 140 .2 9 1.8 7 .2 9 1.8 7 Potash (HP) 110 .2 9 1.8 5 .2 9 1.8 5 Labor (hired) Manday 18 .2 12 2.4 43 .2 12 2.4 43 Bullock Pairday 25 .2 10 2 50 .2 10 2 50 T77 T77 Oilseeds Seed kg 6.7 .15 6 .9 6 .15 6 .9 6 Manure " .13 .15 200 30 4 .15 200 30 4 Bullock pairday 25 .15 4 .6 15 .15 4 .6 15 All Cropa Seed 4.15 478 4.15 428 Manure 1.75 385 50 1.75 385 50 Urea 1.8 68.8 273 1.8 68.8 273 TSP 1.8 35.4 133 1.A 35.4 133 Potash (HP) I. 9 26 1.0 9 26 Pesticlde 1.6 .32 106 1.6 .32 106 Labor (hired) 3.0 31.2 561 3.0 31.2 561 Bullock 4.15 36.6 915 4.15 36.6 915 2,492 2,492 C. NET pltODtCrION VALl)g Paddy (L) 4 ,739 5,017 Paddy (llIV) 5,649 5,989 Jute 319 319 Oilseeds 252 252 10,959 577 Index 100 106 1/ Except for labor and bullock; converted from maunds per acre at 37.3 kg per mound. I/ Mixed. 3/ 34 ic8 for broadcast, 19 kg for transplanted paddy. >/ 8 pairdays for broadeast, 9 pairdays for transplanted paddy. S/ BOro (htV) only. 6/ 9 palrdays for broadcast, 10 pairdays for transplanted paddy. -69- BANC.LADBSH Annex 5.2 1Tab1o3 8WDB SMALL SCHPHgS PROJBTECr Illuatrative Farm Budgets - Irrigation Subprojecto (3 kre Parm, Constant FYR4 Prtces) ------Prsent------~~~~~~Futurewith Project ------Price Cropped Area - Value/Cost Cropped Area ----- Ouantity----- Value/Cost llnit (Tk) (ac) (kg/ac 1/) (kg) (Yk) (ac) (ks/ac 1/) (kg) (Tk) A. PRODUcTION R. Aus (L) Maund 144 .15 400 60 232 - - T. Aua (HYV) - - - - .2 1 .1l(0 220 84ql B. Aman (L) .8 480 384 1,482 .55 530 292 1,127 T. Amain (L) .3 80o 240 927 .5 880 440 1,699 T. Aman (hYV) - - - .8 1,150 920 3,552 B. Anu, B. Aman 2/ " 1.2 700 840 3,243 - - -3 Boro (gYV) - - - - 1.3 1,620 2,106 _82 1Y Subtotal: Paddy 2.45 1,524 5,884 3.35 3,978 15,357 Wheat 132 .1 550 55 195 .2 1,000 200 708 Jute 160 .25 580 145 622 .25 640 160 686 Ohlaeeds 230 1.2 300 360 2,220 1.2 330 396 2t442 All Crops 4.0 8,921 5,0 19,143 B. INPUTS Paddy (L) Seed kg 4 2.45 32.2 3/ 78.8 315 1.05 26,9 3/ 28.2 113 Manure .13 .15 200 30 4 - - - Labor (hired) Manday 18 .3 In 3 54 .s 17 8.5 153 Bullock Pairday 25 2.45 B.1 4/ 19.9 497 1.05 8.5 4/ R.9 222 A70 7-8 Paddy (thV) Seed kg 5 2.3 19 43.7 219 Manure .13 .2 200 40 5 Urea Maund 148 2.3 66.2 152.3 604 TSP 140 2.3 45.2 104 390 Potash (MP) 110 2.3 19 41.4 122 Pesticide kg 330 2.3 .3 .h9 228 Labor (hired) Manday 18 2.3 19.25 44.3 797 Bullock Pairday 25. 2.3 10 23 575 2,940 Wheat Seed kg 4.6 .1 50 5 23 .2 50 10 46 Urea Maund 148 .1 37 3.7 15 .2 50 10 40 TSP 140 .1 24 2.4 9 .2 37 7.4 28 Potash (MP) Io .1 9 .9 3 .2 18 3.6 11 Peeticide kg 330 .1 .1 .u. 3 .2 .2 .04 13 Bullock Pairday 25 .1 8 .8 20 .2 8 1.6 40 Jute Seed kg 53.6 .25 4 1 54 .25 4 1 54 Manure .13 .25 375 94 12 .25 375 94 12 Urea Maund 14A .25 24 6 24 .25 24 6 24 TSP 140 .25 9 2.25 8 .25 9 2.25 8 Potash 110 .25 9 t.21 6 .25 9 2.25 6 Labor (hired) Mnaday 18 .25 12 3 54 .25 20 5 90 Bullock pairday 25 .25 10 2.5 63 .25 10 2.5 63 221 257 Oilseeds Seed kg 6.7 1.2 6 7.2 48 1.2 6 7.2 48 Manure .13 1.2 200 240 31 1.2 200 24n 31 Bullock Pairday 25 1.2 4 4.8 120 1.2 4 4.8 120 199 All Crops Seed 4.0 440 5.0 480 Manure 1.6 364 47 1.65 374 48 Urea .35 9.7 39 2.75 168.3 668 TSP .35 4.65 17 2.75 113.65 426 Potash (MP) .35 3.15 9 2.75 47.25 139 Pesticide .1 .01 3 2.5 .73 241 labor (hired) .55 6 108 3.05 57.8 1,040 Bullock 4.0 28 700 5.0 40.8 1,020 1;363 4,062 C. NET PRODUCTION VALUL Paddy tL) 5,014 2,338 Paddy (BtV) 9,591 Wheal 122 530 Jute 401 429 oilseeds 2,021 2,243 7,558 ~~~~~~~~~~15,131 Index 10n 200 1/ Except for labor and bullock: converted from seunds per acre at 37.3 kg per maund. 4!itwed, 37/ 34 kg for broadcast, 19 kg for transplanted paddy. I/ 8 pairdays for broadcast, 9 pairdays for transplanted paddy. -70*- RANCLAI3BSR Annex 5.2 BW1B 8HALL SCHRMAS PROJECrT Table 4 Tllustrative Farm Budgets - Irrigation Subprojects (3 Acre Farm, Ccnstant FY84 Prices) ---- ~------Pes Present------Future without Project------Price Cropped Area - nuantity-- -- Value/root Cropped Area --- - atit- Value/Cost Unit (Tk) (ac) (kg/ac 1/) (kg) (Tk) (ac) (kg/ac 1/) (kg) (Tk) A. PRODUCIION B. Aus (L) Maund 144 .15 400 60 232 .15 420 63 243 B. Aman (L) .8 480 384 1,482 .R 50so 400 1,544 . Aman (L) .3 800 240 927 .3 840 252 973 B. Aua, B. Axan 2/ 1.2 700 84n 3,243 1.2 730 876 3,382 Subtotal: Paddy 2.45 1,524 5,884 2.45 1,591 6,142 Wheat 132 .1 550 55 19S .1 600 60 212 Jute 160 .25 580 145 622 .25 580 145 622 qtilaeeds ' 230 1.2 300 360 2,220 1.2 300 36r) 2,220 All Crops 4.0 8,921 T.0 9,196 Peddy (L) Seed kg 4 2.4j 32.2 3/ 78.8 315 2.45 32.2 3/ 7R.R 315 Manure .13 .15 20n0 30 4 .15 200 3n 4 Labor (hired) Manday 18 .3 10 3 54 .3 10 3 54 Bullock palrday 25 2.45 8.1 4/ 19.9 497 2.45 8.1 4/ 19.9 497 a70 ~0s70 Wheat Seed kg 4.6 .1 50 5 23 .1 50 5 23 Urea Maund 14R .1 37 3.7 15 .1 37 3.7 15 TSP 140 .1 24 2.4 9 .1 24 2.4 9 Potash (HP) ' 110 .1 9 .9 3 .1 9 .9 3 Pesticide kg 53"' .1 .1 .01 3 .1 .1 .01 3 Bullock Pairday 25 .1 a .8 20 .1 8 .8 20 Jute Seed kg 53.6 .25 4 1 54 .25 4 1 54 Manure .13 .25 375 94 12 .25 375 94 12 Urea IlAund 148 .25 24 6 24 .25 24 6 24 TSP 140 .25 9 2.25 8 .25 9 2.25 8 Potash 110 .25 9 2.25 6 .25 9 2.25 6 Labor (hired) Kenday 1R .25 12 3 54 .25 12 3 54 Bullock Palrday 25 .25 10 2.5 63 .25 10 2.5 63 2-1 2 1 Oilseeds Seed kg 6.7 1.2 6 7.2 48 1.2 6 7.2 48 Manure .13 1.2 200 240 31 1.2 200 240 31 Bullock Poirday 25 1.2 4 4.8 120 1.2 4 4.8 120 All Cropu Seed 4.0 440 4.0 440 Manure 1.6 364 47 1.6 364 47 Urea .35 9.7 39 .35 9.7 3° TSP .35 4.65 17 .35 4.65 17 Potash (HP) .35 3.15 9 .35 3.15 9 Pesticide .1 .01 3 .1 .01 3 Labor (hired) .55 6 108 .55 6 108 Bullock 4.0 28 700 4.0 28 700 T;i31 T3653 C. 1NETPRODUCTIOP VALUE Paddy (L) 5,014 5,272 Wheat 122 139 Jute 401 401 oilseeds 2,021 2,021 7,558 7,833 Index 100 104 1/ Except for labor and bullock; converted from mtunds per acre &.t 37.3 kg per maund. Yl Mixed . / 34 kg for broadcast, 19 kg for traneplanted paddy. TI 8 psirdays for broaddeest 9 peirdays for transplanted paddy. BANGLADESH BWDBS_MLL SCREMESPROJECT Economic Price of Paddy 1983 1984 1995 1086 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 IQ92 1993 1996 1Q95 Thai 5X Broken, FOR Rangkok 1| Current US,,per MT 300 360 395 (443) (497) (558) (626) 702 (742) (784) (828) (875) 924 Coont. 1q84 US$ per MT 379 360 361 374 396 420 444 470 469 467 466 464 462 Index 31.3 100 109.5 118.3 125.4 132.9 140.9 149.4 158.3 167.8 177.8 188.6 199.8 Pieca. Year Nasis Const. 1984 US$ per MT 344.5 360.5 367.5 385 408 432 457 469.5 468 466.5 465 463 Exchange Rate (Tk per US$) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Const. 1984 Tk per MT 8,613 9,013 9,188 9,625 10,200 10,800 11,425 11,738 11,100 11,663 11,625 11,575 x Adjustant Pactor (0.9 2/) CIF Chittagong 7,752 8,112 8,269 8,663 9,180 9,720 10,283 10,564 10,530 10,497 10,463 '10,418 Plus: Handling and Transport between Port and Market 3/ 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Market Price 8,952 9,312 9,469 9,R63 10,380 10,920 11,483 11,764 11,730 11,697 11,663 11,618 Less: Processing 4/ 546 546 546 546 546 546 546 546 546 546 546 546 Ex-Mill Price of Rice 8,406 8,766 8,923 q,317 9,834 10,374 10,937 11,218 11,184 11,1%1 11,117 11,072 iiv&alent Prlce'of Paddy S.A64 5,698 5,8OO 6,056 6,392 6,743 7,109 7,292 7,270 7,246 7,226 7,197 (at 0.65) Less: Handling and Transport / between Mill and Farmgate 5/ / 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 Faragate Price, Tk per MT 5,360 5,594 5,696 5,952 6,288 6,639 7,005 7,188 7,166 7,144 7,122 7,093 Faragate Price, Tk per ad. (rounded)61 200 210 215 220 235 250 260 270 265 265 265 265 1/ World Bank, EPDCO, .uiy1983. 2! Based on rf76-83 relationship between import unit values and prices of reference quality. _1 Based on RD TI Project SAR (Report No. 4348-BD, May 17, 1983). Non-traded cost components have been adjusted using an SCF of 0.83. x 41 Net of value of by-products; adjusted by SCF of 0.83. 51 Average distance assumed to be about 10 miles; adjusted by SCF of 0.83. I 6/ 1 MT - 26.8 ad. (maund). B9ANGJ,ADRSR IRWD RMALLqCRHRMRS PROJECT Rconomic Price of Wheat 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199n 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 CWRS 1/ in Store Thunder Bay 21 Current US$ per MT 173 187 197 (216) (237) (261) (286) 314 (333) (353) (374) '3%) 42z Const. IQ84 USS per MT 189 187 180 183 189 196 203 210 210 210 210 210 210 Index 91.3 100 109.5 118.3 125.4 132.9 140.9 149.4 158.3 167.8 177.8 18R.6 199.8 Fiscal Year Basis Const. 1984 US$ per MT 188 183.5 191.5 1R6 192.5 199.5 206.5 210 210 210 210 210 fxchange Rate (Tk per USS) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Const. 1984 Tk per MT 4,700 4,588 4,538 4,650 4,813 4,988 5,163 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 x AdjustmentFactor (1.1 31) 3 CIF Chittagong 5,170 5,047 4,992 5,115 5,294 5,487 5,679 5,775 5,775 5,775 5,775 5,775 Plus: Handlingand Transport between Port and Market 4/ 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,2nO 1,200 1,00 1,200 Market Price 6,370 6,247 6,192 6,315 6,494 6,6R7 6,879 6,975 6,975 6,975 6,975 6,975 Less: Handling and Transport between 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 Market and Parmgate 5/ _ _ _ Unadjusted Farmgate Price 6,266 6,143 6,088 6,211 6,390 6,583 6,775 6,871 6,871 6,871 6,871 6,871 Less: Removal of Foreign Matter (5%) 313 307 304 311 320 329 339 344 344 344 344 344 Farmgate Price, Tk per MT 5,953 5,836 5,784 5,900 6,070 6,254 6,436 6,527 6,527 6,527 6,527 6,527 Faragate Price, Tk per ad. 6/ (rounded) 220 220 215 220 225 2;5 240 245 245 245 245 245 It CanadianNo. I Western Red Spring. 2/ World Bank, RPDCO, July 1983. 3 Bsased on FY6-83 relationshipbetween import unit values and prices of referencequality. 4 Bbased on RD 1I Prjject SAR (ReportNo. 4348-BD,May 17, 1983). Non-traded cost componentshave been adjustedusing an SCF of 0.83. 5/ Adjusted by SCF of 0.83. @/ I MT - 26.8 EA. (maund). BAN9LADRES MbB SMALLSCff E8 PROJ1CT Economic Price of Jute 1983 1984 1985 1986 I187 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Bangladesh White n, FOMR¶t.tagong/Chalna I/ Current USS per MT 2R5 3i5 340 (359) (378) (399) (421) 444 (4.81) (521) (565) - (61Z) 663 Const. 1984 tdS$ per MT 312 315 311 30 301 300 299 297 304 31I 31R 324 33Z Index 91.3 100 109.5 118.3 125.4 132.9 140.9 144.4 158.3 167.8 177.8 188.6 199.8 Fiscal Year Basis Const. 1984 US$ per MT 313.5 313 307 302 300.5 29S.5 248 300.5 307 314 321 328 Excbange Rate (lT per nss) As.O 25.0 25.0 25.h 25.0 25.n 25,0 75.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2S.0 Const. 198) Tk per URS 7,R38 7,825 7,675 7,550 7,513 7,488 7,450 7,513 7,675 7,850 8,025 8,200 x Adjustment Factor (1.0 2/) CIF Ctittagong/Chalna 7,838 7,825 7,675 7,550 7,513 7,488 7,450 7,513 7,675 7,850 8,025 8,200 LeaB: Eaciditng and Transport betveen Port and Storage Point 31 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 Price ex Rtorage Point 6,488 6,475 6,325 6,200 6,163 6,138 6,100 6,163 6,325 6,500 6,675 6,850 L,es8: WoCeBsing, Raidling ana Transport between Storage Point and Parmgate It 1,350 1,350 1,3S6 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1.350 1,350 1,350 1,350 unadjusted Farngate Price 5,138 5,125 4,975 4,850 4,813 4,788 4,750 4,813 4,975 5,150 5,325 5,500 Milling Afficiency 0.8 0. n0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 n.A 0.R O.8 Faragate Price, Tk per MT 4,110 4,100 3,q9o 3,880 3,850 3,830 3,^00 3,850 3,9P8 4,120 4,260 4,4W0 Fartgate Price, Tk per M. (rounded) 4/ 155 155 150 145 145 145 140 145 I5O 155 16n 165 I/ world Bank, FPDC0, July 1983. 2/ Based on FY76-83relationship between exportunit values and prices of referencequality. 31 Based on IFAD Small Scale Flood Control, Drainage and rrrigation Project (Report No. 4463-En, nee. 28, 1983). Non-tradedcost compomants have been adjusted ustn$ an SCF of 0.83. 41 1 Mr - 26.R ud. (maund). BANGLADESH BWDB SMALL SCHEMESPROJECT EconomicPrice of Oilseeds 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Soybeans,US. CIP Rotterdam11 Current US$ per MT 260 302 350 (385) (423) (465) (511) 562 (5Q5) (629) (665) (704) 745 Const. 1984 USS per MT 285 302 320 325 337 350 363 376 376 375 374 373 373 Index 91.3 100 109.5 118.3 125.4 132.9 140.9 149.4 158.3 167.8 177.8 18E.6 199.8 Fiscal Year Basis Coust. 1984 US$ per MT 293.5 311 322.5 331 343.5 356.5 369.5 376 375.5 374.5 373.5 373 ExchangeRate (Tk per US$) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Const. 1984 Tk per MT 7,338 7,775 8,063 8,275 8,588 8,913 9,238 9,400 9,388 9,363 9,338 9,325 x AdjustmentFactor (1.3 2/) CIF Chittagong 9,539 10,108 10,482 10,758 11,164 11,587 12,009 12,220 12,204 12,172 12,139 12,123 Plus: Handling and Transportbetween Port and Market 3/ 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Market Price 10,739 11,308 11,682 11,958 12,364 12,787 13,209 13,420 13,404 13,372 13,339 13,323 Less: Processing41 978 978 978 978 978 978 978 978 978 978 978 978 Pl?s: Value of Oilcake4/ 51 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 1,141 Ex-MIll Price 10,902 11,471 11,845 12,121 12,527 12,950 13,372 13,583 13,567 13,535 13,502 13,486 Less: Handling and Transport between Hill and Faragate4/ 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 FaregatePrice, Tk per NT 10,79R 11,367 11,741 12,017 12,423 12,R46 13,268 13,479 13,463 13,431 13,398 17:,382 Fan gate Price, Tk per ad. 61 (rounded) 405 425 440 450 465 4R0 495 505 505 500 500 500 1/ World Rank, EPDCO, July 1983. BEased on F776-83 relationship between Import unit values and prices of reference quality. 31 Assumed to cost the sase as for rice and wheat (see Report No. 4463-BD). ¢ J 1 Adjusted uaing a standard conversion factor (SCP)of 0.83. a x 5I Cake recovery rate 0.66. I11 WT - 26.8 ad. (saund). -75- Annex 6,1 811DBSMAL, SC11E8 PROJECT Table 5 bconoeic Price of Fartilizsre 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 19119 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Dre Bn, StgdPOn Surope 1/ 147 167 231 (263) (298) (339) (385) 438 (468) (499) (533) (569) 608 Const. 1984 tlS$ per ttt 161 167 211 222 23A 255 273 293 246 297 300 302 304 TrsP, FOB Ps Cult 1/ CurrentPnTS perPtIT 144 163 tR9 (210) (234) (260) (289) 322 431 Const. 19A4 Tk Per P1 15R 163 173 17R 187 196 205 216 216 216 216 21b 216 mp', 2/ FO8 Vancouver 1/ Current USS per tT 82 92 109 (121) (134) (148) (164) 1R2 243 Conet. 1984 tlBS per K4r 90 QZ Ina 102 107 lit ll6 122 122 122 122 122 122 Index 92.3 lo 109.5 118.3 125.4 132.9 140.9 149.4 158.3 167.P 177.R 188.6 199.8 viescl Year RSste Couvit.Iq4 U)55 per mr Uren 164 189 216.5 230 246.5 264 283 294.5 296.S 298.5 301 303 TSP 160.5 16R 175.5 182.5 191.5 200.5 210.5 216 216 216 216 216 M4P 91 96 l01 104.5 109 113.5 119 122 122 122 122 122 Cenet. 1964 Tkapa t4t (ITh 25.0/USS) Urea 4,100 4,125 5,413 5,750 6,163 6,600 7,075 7,363 7,413 7,463 7,525 7 575 TSP 4,013 4,200 4,388 4,563 4,788 5,013 5,263 5,400 5,400 5,600 5,400 5 400 MP 2,275 2,400 2,525 2,613 2,725 2,838 2,975 3,050 3,050 3,050 3,050 3,050 x AdjuIteOnt Factor (1.4 3/) CIP Chitta cong Orea 5,740 6,615 7,578 8,050 8,628 9,240 9,905 10,308 10,378 1d,448 10,535 10,605 TSP 5,618 5,880 6,143 6,388 6,703 7,OR 7,368 7,560 7,560 7,560 7,560 7,560 ttP 3,915 3,360 3,535 3,65R 3,815 3,973 4,165 6,270 4,270 4,270 4;270 4,270 19cnd1ta,land Transport between Part *ad Aar4et or Storage Point 00 Itrea / 700 700 700 70 700 700-700 TSP 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 MP 704 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 Market Price iJres 6,440 7,315 A,278 8,750 9,328 9,940 10.605 9,608 9,678 9,748 9,835 9,90S TSP 6 318 6,5RO 6,843 7,08R 7,403 7,718 8,068 8,260 8,260 8,260 8,260 8,260 up 3,885 4,060 4,235 4,358 451S 4,673 4,865 4,970 4,970 4,970 4,970 4,970 13andling end Transport between market or Storage Point end Farsgate 6/ nrea 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 TSP 170 170 t70 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 MP 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 Farre8ete Pr ce, Tix per PlI Urea 6,610 7,485 8,448 8,920 9,498 10,110 10,775 9,778 9,848 9,918 10,005 10,075 TSP 6,488 6,750 7,013 7,258 7,573 7,888 8,238 A,430 8,430 8,430 8,430 8.430 PP 4,055 4,230 4,405 4,528 4,685 4,843 5,035 5,140 5,140 5,140 5,140 5,140 Parmgate Price, T1 per 50 k8 8k 8 7/ Urea 330 375 420 445 475 505 540 490 490 495 500 505 TSP 325 335 350 365 380 395 410 420 420 420 420 420 MP 205 210 220 225 235 240 250 255 255 255 255 255 ?armgate Price, Tk per ad. 7/ 8/ Ure, 245 280 315 335 355 375 400 365 365 370 375 375 TSP 240 250 260 270 285 295 305 315 315 315 315 315 Mv 150 160 165 170 175 180 190 190 t90 190 190 190 W1Vorld Bank. EPDCO, July 1983. 2/ Potassiun chloride, also known as zurtate of potash. 7/ Basd on Fr76-83 relationship between fertilixer import unit values and prices of reference quality (weighted average of ures, TSP, DAP and PP). 4/ based on Report go. 4463-8D, Decber 78, 1983, Small Seale Plood Control, Drainage and IrritRaton Project. costs of non-treded cQponenta have been adjusted using a standard conversion factor (SCP) of O.3. 5/ It is assumed that over the next few years Rangladesh v.ll becara a not exporter of urea. 6/ atisate baced on PADC costa between primary distribution point and Thann sales center, plus handling and transport costs to feterate. Ad.lusted br SCP of 0.83. 7/ Rounded lo nearest Ti 5. T/ I MT - 26.8 ad. (aund). -76- BANGLADESH Annex 6.2 BHDB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT ECONOMICBENEFITS AND COSTS (TK MILLION) YEAR 1904 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 PRODBENEF WITH PROJ 423.0 809.3 1139.3 1484.6 1647,7 1064.2 2131.7 2366.2 2490.4 2560.4 2587.8 PRODBENEF WtTHOUT PROJ 473.0 809.3 1139.3 1446.5 1533.6 1627.5 1730.0 1789.5 1796.8 1797.4 1796.7 INCR PRODBENEFITS - - - 38.0 114.1 236.7 401.6 576.7 693.5 763.0 791.1 PRODCOSTS WITH PROJ 177.2 293.6 395.9 473.0 513.5 570.5 634.0 684.2 721.5 742.5 750.5 PRODCOSTS INTHCUTPROJ 177.2 293.6 391.8 452.1 457.8 463,9 467.6 466.1 466.3 466.5 466.8 INCR PRODCOSTS - - 3,9 21.7 55.7 106.6 166,3 210.1 255.2 276.0 283.6 INVESTMENTCOSTS 73.0 128.9 200.6 190.9 139.6 54.2 - - - - - Ol8 COSTS - - - 6.7 13.9 21.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 INVEST AND 01M COSTS 23.0 128.9 200,6 197.6 153.6 75.8 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 PROJECTBENEFITS - - - 38.0 114.1 236.7 401.6 576.7 693.5 763.0 791.1 TOTAL PROJECTCOSTS 23.0 128.9 204,5 219,4 209.2 182,4 191.9 243,7 200.7 301.6 309.2 NET PROJECT BENEFITS -23.0 -128.9 -204.5 -101.3 -95.1 54.3 209.7 333.1 412.0 461.4 481.9 YEAR 1995-1996 1977 1998 1999 2000 2001-2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012-2013 PRODBENEF WITH PROJ 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 2578.9 PROD DENEFWITHOUT PROJ 1790,0 1790.8 1790,8 1790.0 1790.8 1790.8 1790.0 1790.8 1790.8 1790.8 1790,8 INCR PRODBENEFITS 788.2 758,2 708.2 780.2 700.2 708,2 708.2 788,2 788.2 788.2 788.2 PRODCOSTS WITH PROJ 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 751.0 PRODCOSTS WITHOUT PROJ 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 467.0 INCR PRODCOSTS 2L$.0 284.0 204.0 284.0 204.0 204.0 284,0 204.0 204.0 284.0 204,0 INVESTMENTCoSTS - 5.2 7.3 9.4 3.1 - 5.2 7.3 9.4 3.1 - 088 COSTS 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 25,6 25,6 25.6 25.6 23,6 INVEST AND DAM COSTS 25.6 30.8 32.9 35.0 20.7 25.6 30. 32,9 35.0 28.7 25,6 PROJECTBENEFITS 788.2 788.2 788.2 708.2 708.2 788.2 788.2 788.2 788.2 788.2 788.2 TOTAL PRDJECTCOSTS 309.6 314.0 316.9 319.0 312.7 309.6 314.0 316.9 319.0 312-7 309.6 NET PROJECTBENEFITS 470.6 473.4 471.3 469.2 475.5 478.6 473.4 471.3 469.2 475.5 478.6 ======--======m ...... == .....- - ...... =g w...... =- ...... -- =....-. ..-...... "... -...... YEARSARE FISCALYEARS ENDING IN JUNEOF THE CALENDARYEAR SHOWN. nminY D, e"4 1uau BANGLADESH WDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT BighaiRood ProtectionSubproject Area-ElevationDistribution as Comparedto Stagesof the BishkholiRiver at BamnaStfation (ft) (rn) (m) (ft) I in 20 Year Stage 10--3 3- -10 c c 0 MeanHVL 0 u- 1 LU MlacnLWL 0 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 A M J J A S 0 N D j r M Area(1.000 hectares) Monthof the WoterYear Wold Bank-25485 BANGLADESH WDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT Kalaroa Drainage SuLbproject Area-ElevationDistributlon as Compared to Stagesof the BetnaRiver at Kaloroa Station Cm) (ft.) (i) (e.) 6 20 20 6 HighestRecorded Stoge *14.3t. 4 Sept.1970 5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 15 15- 4 4 MonthlyMaxD WIL a 10 1-0 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~om 2 HWL,< 2 0 I 5.000 10.000 15,000 A M J J A S 0 N D J F M Area(Acres) Monthof the WaterYear Wotd Bank-25486 -79- BANGLADESH BWDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT Kangsha Rood Projection and Drcinage Subproject Aot* on Dfsl,lbutlon as Comnpcred to Rwer Kongsha Stages (ft.) (m) (Itt) Cm), 40 -`1 40 _41k2 10~ -10- g t ~~~~~RetentionVolume 2 /4 Q~~~~ ______1n____-_____ 20 60 10D6 150 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FB FR 6 Vdwnre In Poider x10 m3 Mnths It.) (in) 2 2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 2 1 4 1 _ - -I. I I I I I I. 30~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 O 5 10 15 APR MAY JUN JUL AUS SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MR jnea- Ho Months 6*-2667 -80- BANWLADMSH OWiDOSQMAL SCH.IMES PROJECT Orgnlzabn of Bangklceh ai Devkn nt Board OCRtM. a.;,.&t _ t C.E., N. Zonog C.. C.E Plnnn(DFCPmr Ie C11 Plnnn 11 1 2 C. Zolea§ j Dlr, l J ~~~~~~~Dlr..Planning|WRanr Dir.1 c_nto wP1_oo J E. .5W.ZonewdWir (FAD8): 1 Dk. Pu Dnir.h:un |& Wae UserlGI Scee|Ie- Dlr,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(FCIEI,u k.epafi Reeu Ptek | .. DP- Dir..mn Plnnr Dir.,~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C.E.. Iwon e pfect E-H | CE.Desbgn & | El..GrBopk DeIsign Add. C.E. _N,kuhurl |C.E.. Gwanoes EBaft jEotfd 0"*-20U9 -81- BANGLADESH WATERDEVELOPMENT BOARD SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT WDBOrganization Chart for Planning and Implernentation of Subprojects | ret, Chairnan l I Member, enbr Planning j _ Imnpl_nentot_on r Chiet Engineer, Planfing I L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Deputy Diector. Assist. Eng. Superintofnding Planning () |(4) 11Exhe r l Design(3) rgExcu{A E Deputy Diresctor, Hydolois | Hydrology(1M 1 d Economist(1) Jr EcnrLs 3 ostuto X Agronomist (4i Worid lBank-25490 BANGLADESH BWDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJEC7 Organizatlon-"Pilot" Decentralized 0 and M Program Chairman, BWDB Member 1 Member Member Member r Implementton 0 and M Planning Administration Zonal l ChiefEngineers l , I - I Superintending Engineers _ Exec. Engrs. Exec. Engrs. (Implementation) (O and M) Sula-Divisionol Sub-L)iMsionc~F Sub~-DivisionaI Engineer (0 and M] | ngineer (0 EngineerSn(D (0 and M) WB-25828 BANGLADESH BWDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT ImplementatlonSchedule rscoalYewr 1983-19U4 198 -1985 1985-1986 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1939 G roup 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 - 2 3 4 _dent-Ication& Screening ... 4 ,FeuA,b,ilb Sh;t s_ o rnci Design _ _ a 2 Land Acquisition & rendeflng Constructlon_._,._._ _._. .,_ I&M _ . _ - 4, Uentrrtr &Screemning *I.... I.... *... Feas tybSvudt ConStruction . O&M - i - ODI F;| dent&fcolion tnalAceuslon & SC'eening S...... -trnen - _ | 'l* ,IIII oeasbIityF S|ud I| Rno Desgn Lcnz Acusition & Tendenng Constructio Laentifiation &Scedening |__ - 1&Mlllltr- - r L|1 uk] 1 = JuAVAugoUSt Saprenenn 2 = October No`errbw Decenrb 3 Jonuay rebuav Mach 4 = AVitMcv urine Ncl }av rascn extrinds n 9argicdeshfhon June to Octo4Db Wod Bonkk-25587 IBRD 17471 49I44' OCTOBER 193 | 90-33 4|9040 91-4? Bridre BtsANJGLADE SH Proposed Streorn Diversion BWDB SMALL SCHEMESPROJECT _ Project Boundary KANGSHA DRAINAGEAND FLOODCONTROL SUBPROJECT .-'r Proposed Flood Embankment - Roads Rariways R,vers Laokes - Drainage Chaonnels ContoursirS feet I nternratioanl Boundari,es 0 _= 15 20 / JG* r / ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MILES_ol KoSo. Chhc,nd hona G_hoqo-,o; Gorkondn ,4srhR,rr\t .. yNc,oyo ~o,oho J PUh, b |N@EPALg \ oD ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~24-54- [2 1 J U N D I A \n v n/ ft" doc wSt,fini I 2 31 I use~~~~~~~~~~d-d th, b4inrib 'irof.i-o'ilp F-u rh |ND24N IA v.ror. I -Prnorid - iorr andnA ho I voin nairoo.-linhE1'air - hrv,nnr fri-A -viomoro 90:42- 90*4/ 2,,.\ tv /@ Ocij[ y9F40 IBRD I17472 89-02' b9@04' 89'0b' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OC108ERt983 BANGL ADESH ,, ~~~BWDBSMALL SCHEMES PROJECT . ; g \ \ , F ~~~~~~KALAROADRAINAGE SUBPROJECT _ _ ;; ~~~~~~~~~~~PeotectBoundory . 4 ~~~~~~~~~- --;------\- ProposedBridge ' T,' - 1b o, S 1 \) j * 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ProposedSluice , ,, , ~~~~'/ ~~~t -' )} -Propose,' Drainage Channels -225$' . ,' ,)vS1 l. . yRivers 28' , ,;b 1; \ , ' C\t n ) .'( / 2t -2° Contours in feet ; ; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Iteraional Boundaries !~~~~~~~~~Jt >'; /' ' ' 1 f- Y e ,sSnt6D \ .,; , ,,- nC - -s \!tX (FWtXw0'C- o/he~~~~~MILE A j r t i !> ) \Ez \\< / - onA- aWub A~~~~~~~~~~~5 10 5 0t W '., "' , j /!' ' ' X ' i . >>q-,>t , ' -4 o'{,(t __- ss h. b,,-ce\~~~~~fo, o th )~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~n'. t* - -a\'225 r,v - ft. - 24- <24 Dt c<;>o22-52 / q 2 - e A t{ $ x, \ V~W\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~bilofTh a,* ,,d h, I~~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~k(a-I ! FN po,) 88-~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--90 9?- 14 , 890b of-Y I-Ion, ~~~~~~~ wy~lega ta ______90__r_90Joa_/_/____10_____I?9 - IBRD17473 77Z~~~~90 9r 90 "O 9O.12 OTOBER 1933 2 INDIA A _ 24- ~~ ~ ( -22'22 24 <, Dho.k 22- INDIA/ 22/ c~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 98* 90 937 A _. _ ___ g J /hv~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oJI./,, 23' iO 22-20. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IX 17.k~ ~ ~ ~ t/Sao, \ \( , vA'o/,kbo\ -22'16' 31 BANGL ADESH BWDB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT BIGHAI FLOOD CONTROLSUBPROJECT Proiect Boundo,y Proposed Flood Embankment Proposed Slu,ces E.,st.ng Flood Emnbonkment R,ve,s ond Streoms Roads Contours *n feet :s < Xrsoeb CA | 2-' 2214 - - Inter-othonol Boundor,es S 10 1 5 20 MTILES r b p,- d by Th. Wrb O n.*1fd .oo&lW ,eyrror tUr rhroro.neO rn~,ooor .o eCt,-.w- fori rtrOO on of Fro., Ab B.*- V* IoroOOo. F-roox: C o thert orroso rd n V0,en,r,o W--r or nUP d roo 000*P _nrho Coti of TI,i Y.tyd S.* nd fP. 64-oo.trwn F-no G.rporU800. 0,,9ir,-Of 0,0 lovrMothnar ofn -'fooy rw .od-roOronl orrr -Ot.-of bar h bo.n0O 90'06 90-08 9010' 90t2 IBRD 17474 ,, , __ ,, . _ OC1O3ER1983 1-~ SRSI BANGLADESH -26-~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 I N D I A BWDB SMALL SCHEMES PROJECT CHENCHURI BEEL IRRIGATION SUBPROJECT -;71- 3 Dohc a ,/ < I N D I A 5<;)h t 72 (ic I CAc.rnd,ba,puw SB 90, 92' _ Ganoadho,bolha/, Bodho t orngalgrom Belelgorden Ptaject Boundary d KrynmO/OPU Existing Ernbon'xment Proposed Pump.ng Stotion Proposed Momn Conol TypcoIl lrngotion Scheme 2 C/S Ou/fIT 1- … International Boundaries 0 5 10 5 Th' ,r"' hs,airn m Np-rd by Th. World B-ank s AlOt tS,vc'fiVrtoW the COhI-0nhnfC ol lhn .ndo,sa y,n rrt-s.rroy to, ta nWtorrran ueAOf TheMWoral fank antheMo tAr.lfnU n '-at a Careort.rnn Th. dco,rn, bo,,S userdand the bOrrdounMS Snow . n mani do oel erOif On ttr PoraoA ;li;,.r WorkA B-.oA m) Ihb wi?ryri,&o rnn-rr Corphon. any Imigri'nt oA. hnIr on, 5talu, u any t-rylor-y or any enorase-lnt Ar accuQtflACo of SuchbOomda-3eS ,Qt i4°~~~9 90°l ' 9:|2 [ 890 BANGLADESH BWDBSMALL SCHEMESPROJECT -Fa?Gouha, T |o SubprojectLocations ro Goh ti _t° SUBPROJECTLOCATIONS -26 w q 4hoklurgoobn \ Financedby: 26- .FAD IDA ADB T o A'oi,h0, 7 ~\~}ESP __1 DIIsL4)2vPUR{ \iS5< | 51 - . - ~ROADS -4---$-- |RAILWAYS DISTRICTBOUNDARIES * INTERNATIONALBOUNDARIES -250 AKangshcDrainage hhato *2 BOG~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ JFodControl T SolSto ( l <\ r - - r 0 Si/chor z t V X sMbEN9NGHMYIEi . . . / % V gT)A~~~NGAIL 2 Xr ' 5 -240 ur 24°- i ,J < - -XKf >~~KSHTA i N D I A A ~ ~ND -23' ;o e Chenchuri Bil 'rtion F23' CO/Clvto.\ A, Ht P M~HULNA \-\ \,/,'a/oroa Draino'a , \ , RANGAMATI 1-240 \ ~ Ish) ABA} Joydebpur , 2401 42' 24ou KUSHTIA an6iia)ym~~~~~~~hfan I N D I A < | \FARIDPUR f \ _23 n JESSORE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~la' \y\ sham 23' -233 TTo ( ChenchuriBit ,'rri on 230 } 9gv tHULNA ,\\ ./i, S KalKroo Drah\t RANGAMATI C- , i * ' - s. 'r.35 Cy S DtCJ by \d eS1 .. ';1 _ ?t<,;. 7 n 7rk s ,~~~~~ ex>*b. weAt ! t~~~HtTTA6E)G (\ <_,-,3r'eCeevl tARe .Bi 67/ghaiFlood Control C- AI a meratcra:: 7''r F.,,ane ) Wec,~.eW3, cs .f rt'h'S"30do0 "0t 'mr or he 22t Cai "e iio'Sd 6Ea3kaV'de Jh *'ea ' n-. rce ceposwnoo 1"e" 5- 3.'t'?ega Stjfes 0 25 50 75 MILES N BURMA I I I i ; 2r -21° r 1 I 2 > 0 50 100 KILOMETERS C)> , (cLi SR! LANKA 900 91, 1¢ ~ _. ______900 91N 920