<<

This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 30 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK

The Routledge Companion To Phenomenology

Sebastian Luft, Søren Overgaard

Max Scheler

Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 Eugene Kelly Published online on: 29 Sep 2011

How to cite :- Eugene Kelly. 29 Sep 2011, Max Scheler from: The Routledge Companion To Phenomenology Routledge Accessed on: 30 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203816936.ch3

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT

Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms

This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 uihad ni ernucdtes no rud12,eetdconsiderable exerted 1923, in Catholic around a or baptized in was theism he of renounced year, study that he a in In habilitation, until . his and, in approved method Eucken he of 1897, 1899, In problems in Eucken. the principles; the Rudolf ethical with with and study Eucken to Berlin logical 1896 under in in dissertation in Jena his studied Simmel, to completed moved time Wilhelm Georg he sociologist short and the philoso- Neo-Kantian philosophy, a professors, in the Berlin studies for Two and began and physician. Dilthey He a Munich 1874. becoming of in in intention Munich in and born phy was Scheler Ferdinand Max whose mleWlmn h ruh ihhracidfo her from child a her with brought who Wollman, Amélie ue o e,adwre sa dtr oal ihtemi ulsigognof Scheler organ publishing main the with Forschung notably movement editor, phenomenological nomenologische an emerging as worked newly and from the fee, divorce a Wilhelm. for conductor his tured the After of woman. sister Furtwängler, a Maerit with married Scheler improprieties Amélie, presumed involving as scandal Munich to appointed dl enc,Hn ip,Hdi ordMris dt ti,adRoman and Stein, Edith as Conrad-Martius, a phenomenologists Hedwig became such Scheler Lipps, included and which Hans Ingarten. Kreis, Göttingen, Reinach, Göttinger in the Adolf professor as of was member published Husserl leading and Göttingen; enlarged and was Berlin it year; Sympathie that appeared Values hate of Non-formal and hr spoesro hlspyadscooy fe h opeinand completion the After great a . as and status position former philosophy a its accepted of he to for city Scheler, professor for that opportunity as of new a university there to the led university restore Catholic to Cologne, of fl fe 92 cee a ocdt ekepomn sapiaeshlr elec- He scholar. private a as employment seek to forced was Scheler 1912, After fe h a,tee the war, the After ec nGrayadara saCtoi hne.His thinker. Catholic a as abroad and in uence ’ fi s s dto n11 ulse ohHusserl both published 1913 in edition rst e omlsu ndrEhkuddemtraeWertethik materiale die und Ethik der in Formalismus Der ( h aueo Sympathy of Nature The A SCHELER MAX ff rso ordAeae,tecifamnsrtro h city the of administrator chief the Adenauer, Konrad of orts ( Privatdozent erokfrPiooh n hnmnlgclResearch Phenomenological and Philosophy for Yearbook ueeKelly Eugene .Hspeoeooyo yptyado oeand of and sympathy of phenomenology His ). ieadworks and Life n12.H ie uigteeyasi both in years these during lived He 1923. in ) n10,btls i euei 92atra after 1912 in tenure his lost but 1906, in 3 ’ 40 ieto,asuyo h eainbetween relation the of study a direction, s aruhfrPiooheudPhä- und Philosophie für Jahrbuch ’ s de I Ideen fl ecdhmt unto turn to him uenced fi ee n omnder Formen und Wesen s arae ewas He marriage. rst fi n the and s araewsto was marriage rst ( omls nEthics in Formalism fi s atof part rst ), Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 fReligion, of et na al u otuosypbihdessay, published posthumously but time a early for men was an two man, Erkenntnistheorie younger the In the between Scheler, ment. contrasts that point-by-point in make Husserl keep must to We useful conceptions. not perhaps and n oaciiu ftepamtcie fkolde hc eeicue in included were which knowledge, of idea pragmatic the entitled of volume critique the a to and päoeooi e Religion der sphänomenologie indin limned Society and Knowledge experience, religious of phenomenology his of 1921 in publication sbt Husserl both As Knowledge nldshssuetyasadimdaeyteefe,we ewas he when thereafter, immediately and years student his includes title published the last his under in essays culmina- seen be the of may be outlines set its to but a believed appeared, Scheler work, never thought, which his anthropology, of tion philosophical on work A ettoso h hnmnlgclmvmn.Shlrinsists, Scheler movement. phenomenological the of sentations ruddpiooh uthv sisbsccaatrtems iig otintense most living, most the character basic its as have must philosophy grounded eecmltdudrteeiosi fMnrdS rnso ealUiest in University DePaul of works Frings collected S. the Manfred 1969, of in death editorship Chicago. her the his After under publishing on Scheu. completed née and were Scheler in editing Maria died of wife, He task third periods. his The creative 1928. all 19, from May writings posthumous of volumes reo e-ataimadpyhlgs;i umntdi okentitled work a in culminated it psychologism; and Neo-Kantianism of free hc eeetal ihrwfo ulcto.Tescn eidmyb dated he be which may at period date second contested the The 1902, publication. or from 1901 withdrew from eventually he which osdri hscatrtoeapcso i huh htaecnrbtosto contributions are that We thought whole. his the of of have aspects coherence to those and These seems chapter research. organization Person. and phenomenological this as the frequently, in Deity with work consider the little his of himself revised coming-to-be concerned he the simultaneously; in manuscripts beings of human givens “ of a the called role that Scheler moral in what ends, construct ontological to to to used turned openness are and is human phenomenology third unobjecti of method a the source phenomenological phenomenological In about the value. the the and moral as essence highest of love the and of bearing being application nature all and the of around knowledge transformation, centers adoption, it method; his by ized hsc fteGon fBiga prtadIplin( Impulsion and Spirit as Being of Ground the of physics periods coascmol iieScheler divide commonly Scholars ’ olau seio,adwsdpneto i o rfsinladvance- professional for him on dependent was and editor, as colleague s ” i tlugdsMnce mKosmos im Menschen des Stellung Die r sda eea ueo hm,frShlrwudwr nseveral on work would Scheler for thumb, of rule general a as used are ” ” ,Shlrnnteesrgsee i itnefo otmoayrepre- contemporary from distance his registered nonetheless Scheler ), in h tra Man Eternal The ’ n Scheler and s ” Shlr1957 (Scheler .Tecneto ee-opee oko eahsc was metaphysics on work never-completed a of content The ). i isnfre n i Gesellschaft die und Wissensformen Die h hnmnlgclstandpoint phenomenological The ” ’ ocp fpeoeooyeovd ti di is it evolved, phenomenology of concept s ,hsitrsstre otescooyo knowledge of sociology the to turned interests his ), in – o wgni Menschen im Ewigen Vom 7 o.10, Vol. 97: A SCHELER MAX ’ cdmcotu notrepros The periods. three into output academic s hlspiceWeltanschauungen Philosophische 41 (1927; fi a eid sal ae fe 1921, after dated usually period, nal “ hnmnlg n hoyof Theory and Phenomenology fi h lc fMni h Cosmos the in Man of Place The s e usr.I scharacter- is It Husserl. met rst eamleWerke Gesammelte Drang fi “ “ ( behmnpro as person human able hnmnlgeund Phänomenologie phenomenologically A “ “ ,adt nepe the interpret to and ), (1926; h Phenomenology The osbytrue possibly fi highsway his ghting h om of Forms The “ elf six left He . i Wesen- Die a etto left was ” Logik ffi meta- fi cult rst ’ ). s , Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 nltcrlto fies n eodisfnto stefra odto of condition formal the the as denote function to it its used and beyond judgment, and of aesthetic and conceptions ideas, moral, inadequate of empirical, and partial relation had an analytic Kant of and notion Hume the Husserl, to According re question. in and pntemeaning-elements up the opens upon world the of content eoe nojc fpeoeooia re phenomenological This of standpoint. natural object the an upon knowledge becomes all conditions that tent hti ie otehmnsii a egvni l t fullness. its all in pure given the be that may so spirit drives human the vital similar to the technique given repressing inward is for an what Buddhism requires intended of , technique The that before intellectual clearer. to phenomenon an becomes a is chief bring phenomenology Husserl the to in Husserlian Urge, which from and ( reduction, Spirit alienation some phenomenological agreement in of youthful in given metaphysics his are is his what for dispute developed about the Scheler others to when with parties years, dispute ( the to it and until perfect describe in experience to to intended is, contents is that their what contents; ( brings and act and act intuitive the language, single a in in function givenness they where standpoint, e n10 r10,o hc Scheler which of 1902, or 1901 in met intuition, usr h pno that opinion the Husserl priori ial uhrce ncnetta htcudb cone o ysensuous by for uni accounted of patterns be logical [ could by appear what and adds, derivatives, than Scheler genetic serl, content their in by elements, richer much ginally phy, om u stemaigeeet that meaning-elements the as but form, intuition categorical intuition analogous aeilo ecpin This perception. of material xrse under expressed ybl o hti nedd n is and intended, is both what for is symbols intuition Phenomenological fl cieeprec,sest rn rmthe from drink to seeks experience, ective unmediated … a h ujc ftetomen two the of subject the was oiceUntersuchungen Logische ’” a oet h ovcinta htwsgvnt u nuto a ori- was intuition our to given was what that conviction the to come had ” nagmn ftecneto nuto pnteso-called the upon intuition of concept the of enlargement em sderyo ybt usr n cee.Ti ocp fthe of concept This Scheler. and Husserl both by on early used terms Shlr1957 (Scheler … h hnmnlgclpioohr hrt o h ensgvnin given beings the for thirsty philosopher, phenomenological The experiential fi priori a eheadings. ve “ one u toc hti e oko oi htwsso to soon was that on book new a in that once at out pointed ” ucini onto ete ssnoydt o slogical as nor data sensory as neither cognition in function – usr xeddtetr eodisdsgaino the of designation its beyond term the extended Husserl . 7 o.1,38.FrShlr these Scheler, For 308). 12, Vol. 97: “ otc ihtewrditself world the with contact hswie Shlr,dissatis [Scheler], writer this “ carried “ ” secsadlanguage and Essences enlargement o.2; vol. , ( ibid Erlebnis UEEKELLY EUGENE The ibid ” :30.Tepeoeooitre phenomenologist The 380). .: ’ icsino hnmnlg hnthey when phenomenology of discussion s immanent yojcsgvnt xeineo h natural the on experience to given objects by immediate :443 .: fi oia Investigations Logical priori a 42 lotlgclfr n iemaigt the to meaning give and form logical out ll ,i hc hr sacnrec between congruence a is there which in ), ’ ecito uvvs eepesdto expressed He survives. description s ” fl – ftecneto the of concept the of cincalled ection 5.H hnsesto seeks then He 45). nta h c sa nuto fits of intuition an is act the that in , noa si ipne ihall with dispenses it as insofar , ‘ sources hti,wt h hnsta are that things the with is, that , fi ’ dwt ata philoso- Kantian with ed hmevsi hc the which in themselves “ ehdudrae an undertaken had he ] ideation ibid priori a :37.I i later his In 397). .: fl “ “ priori a “ ” priori a fi csintuitively ects en thus being material exhibit cation. or “ otnsof contents ‘ categorical “ essential content ” a be can ” ” these Hus- con- ” fi rst of a Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 meit betaoe n onst ohn eodisl.Oegap single a grasps One itself. fi beyond the nothing which to points and “ alone, object immediate mgnns n mtosaefounded. are emotions and imaginings, is objects The be may they which to objects, of positing all from applied an apart and through characteristics, self-givenness natural to come can tion that judgments and meaning hmevs hc xs neednl fteraaeeso hm Neither them. things of the awareness of awareness their intuitive of direct independently a for exist capacity which the themselves, have beings Human and phenomenon one to foundation it. of to order prior the be in may prior another yet be may phenomenon A The were et.Tepeoeams epyfudd hti,toeta antb eue to reduced be the cannot called that are those them, is, found that that meaning-elements founded, other deeply most phenomena the The Thus ments. All phenomenologically. lifeworld. re-experienced the Wesensreich and in perceptions thematized non-empirical everyday be possess the others sca may in but non-thetically logical language), functions by the that arranged be (i.e. content can thought sense of of data structures empirical logical formal the n ihrfrnet nodro oia roiy( priority logical of order an to reference with and phenomenon dtheir nd pr rmalfrso oiigo h ujcsta hn hmadterreal their and them think that subjects the of positing of forms all from apart , antb ie fapeoeo sntgiven not is A phenomenon a if given be cannot re.Hnesailt,teqaiyo hnns,e thingness, of quality the spatiality, Hence order. ie,nree esasrce rmit from abstracted phenomena less material even nor given, hne t. r ete de oagvnojc hog h so-called the investigation. through phenomenological painful object given a to added neither “ are etc., change, tion nwihpeoeacm ogvnesi h w id feprec [i.e. experience of scienti kinds the two and the in natural givenness the to upon come phenomena which in tnpit u hc are which but all standpoint, at never are experience nomenological htKn aldthe called Kant What priori a priori a understanding – ” htde hstl s ttlsu htteei a is there that us tells It us? tell this does What . u oial netie,bt sesnilrltos( relations essential as both intertwined, logically but Shlr1957 (Scheler “ last totality reduced hnmn r o needn fec other each of independent not are phenomena – lmn ncgiini hrfr o dnia ihtefra element. formal the with identical not therefore is cognition in element ” saptnilyedessse flgclyitrokdmaigele- meaning interlocked logically of system endless potentially a is ful nasnl iei act. eidetic single a in fi ftesgs ntutos rknso eemnto nquestion in determination of kinds or instructions, signs, the of llment ” ” “ sfrso ytei fisatvt frltn htis what relating of activity its of synthesis of forms as given otesml meanings simple the to – 7 o.2 67). 2, Vol. 97: fauiu id ahi h beto aeu and careful a of object the is each kind: unique a of ” “ ” Shlr1957 (Scheler om fitiinadunderstanding and intuition of forms ntentrlwrdve n pntescienti the upon and world-view natural the in xiial givens exhibitable e ff seta relations Essential ective A SCHELER MAX Objectivity fi “ tnpit] ota hnmnnB phenomenon a that so standpoints], c The hri spicpe n om of forms and principles as therein “ As 43 – 7 o.2 0.Tecmlxwrdof world complex The 70). 2, Vol. 97: phenomenological priori a Shlr1957 (Scheler – ob ue hr r uhthat such are there sure, be To . priori a u ahraltoetig are things those all rather but Fundierungsordnung erfrt l hs lmnsof elements those all to refer we “ “ before uefacts. pure pnwihalperceptions, all which upon ff fi ciees movement, ectiveness, rm – – ff 7 o.1,415 10, Vol. 97: ”– xeinei h n in one the is experience liguo hc the which upon olding tm fmaig sit as meaning, of atoms Wesenszusammenhänge re ffoundation of order ntetemporal the in ” ” cee writes, Scheler r o phe- for are .Te include They ). meit intui- immediate priori a selec- – 17) fi c – the ) Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 netoa lmnsi h rcs fcnttto.FrShlr h secsfunc- essences the Scheler, For constitution. of process as the tion in elements intentional shvn oeesnilmaigcnet h enn shnelgclyand logically only hence appears meaning is essential meaning although The perception, the meaning-content. to essential prior some genetically having as not is and formality, lesser or ies hr h nesadn reste yissnhtcatvte.Bt as But, activities. synthetic its by them orders understanding states, Scheler the where givens, “ a being-known nor knowing-an-object aeilojcs atasmsthat assumes Kant objects. material priori the that shows exhibition crucial yatasedna g,wihHseldvlpdin doc- developed This Husserl themselves. which objects ego, Husserl gives by transcendental of thus carried a denial thought are the function by Human that implies then course standpoint. meaning meanings of of natural These trine structures the senses. the upon the to make of voice we functionality judgments the the the by upon in it meanings to recognize delivered to are comes mind The things. uhpsiiiisaedsusdb cee nhsessays, his in Scheler by discussed are possibilities Such We realm. essential this to openness our not by do structured noetically are persons human ie otemn ytesne.Shlrapast eiv htHselmd an made Husserl that believe to appears Scheler Kant senses. to the similar by mind error the to given hmevscnteeoeb itre ydsae ftesii uhas such things spirit individual the the of the of diseases knowledge by by our distorted simply Moreover, be beings. therefore can human themselves of organization cultural and priori A Shlr1957 (Scheler Shlr1957 (Scheler nieramo sec.Shlridenti Scheler essence. of realm entire atcnrse o hrl the sharply too contrasted Kant as cognitions their in function Weltanschauung. and to ethos come their in and and of persons organization, objects of by the principles are subliminally him, learned for which, are the foundation, and of science, order phenomenological their and relations, essential aeilcnetb hi plcto othings. to application their by content material fi “ n rtmtcaeboth are arithmetic and “ yei data hyletic Formal material ldotb hs faihei,adtefra tutrso rtmtccnb given be can arithmetic of structures formal the and arithmetic, of those by out lled ihthe with priori a create nweg sntuieslt ua esn u srltv otebiological the to relative is but reason, human to universal not is knowledge ” ” and rtsaottoape n w er aigfu icso ri.This fruit. of pieces four making pears two and apples two about truths ” – – secs hyaeapeeddo h iei tutrsihrn in inherent structures eidetic the on apprehended are They essences. “ 7 o.3.Peoeooyaoeprisa betv iino the of vision objective an permits alone Phenomenology 3). Vol. 97: 7 o.10), Vol. 97: “ oalpreto;w recognize we perception; all to “ ie hog h essare senses the through given rational material h nesadn rae ohn,mksntig om nothing forms nothing, makes nothing, creates understanding the ’ nti ae noa sh edta h non-intentional the that held he as insofar case, this in s ” ” priori a lmn ntogtadcnrse tt h hoi material chaotic the to it contrasted and thought in element ’ alr oatn owa sgvndrcl nintuition. in directly given is what to attend to failure s are h miia n h rational the and empirical The “ relative h dl fSelf-knowledge, of Idols The “ icpie,bttefra tutrso oi a be can logic of structures formal the but disciplines, formal priori a priori a UEEKELLY EUGENE “ subjective Relativity priori a em Shlr1957 (Scheler terms ff ” csete ftetrso hsrelationship; this of terms the of either ects fi lmn nkoldemypsesagreater a possess may knowledge in element simpliciter 44 sthe es with ’ dao h osiuino phenomena of constitution the of idea s tutrsare structures “ “ ” “ “ animated es data, sense 2+2=4 material “ priori a objective oevr atidenti Kant Moreover, . de I Ideen “ ” ” ihteeesne sthey as essences these with hnmnlgsh Streit Phänomenologische ” fi – or ” ( ue ( gures ” is 72 3: Vol. 97: beseelt orcl rincorrectly, or correctly (1913). ” ruh to brought priori a posteriori a “ formal and ytenei or noetic the by ) etl,Bilder Gestalt, “ ” Ressentiment ihessences, with nrlto to relation in h material the knowledge. – fi 3;logic 73); dthe ed that ) “ on or ” a ” ” ” Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 1957 nweg.Adi sapioohclehc fi iisisl othe knowledge to moral itself limits in it given if evidently ethics is philosophical a what is it And knowledge. to as stood proposition the judge We creation. own our of not is that world a “ in being of sense term Latin 1957 (Scheler h psei etit n betv aflesta r soitdwt h concept the with associated are that the lawfulness objective of and certainty epistemic The fisl n ftefalse the of and itself of h oino eest oi,btbcueistuhi vdn.I ol ennes to nonsense be would It evident. is truth its because but it, “ to necessity of notion the utr-xeinei hnmnlgclitiinvle hmevsuo which upon themselves values intuition phenomenological speci in re-experience must world the with intercourse subliminal ensadaogtecon the gain judgments. among we normative and re-experiencing, beings in situations this function and In that ethos. actions contents our human essential of these of typical to perception judgments access value our the structure found sacred and the or goodness, speci founds and n ua mtos n tmyb hrceie sacnent vroethe overcome to concern a as characterized be may it and emotions, human and con key The a rc uhisgt notheir into insights such trace cee ogtchrneaduiywti h eakbedvriyo human of diversity remarkable the within unity and coherence sought Scheler writes, Scheler knowledge, of theory this of summary In ∨ tefadisonbig hc ecl ntems omlsense formal most the in call lead we that which acts being, the the own be its of only and can execution whatever, itself the having-part of toward form movement any to of element the mines to n anr hsotlgclrltosi sntasail eprl or temporal, spatial, a not in altered is being relationship otherwise or relationship. ontological respect, causal This any in manner. place any its from moving without unesne[ quintessence in part taken is what of being-thus The the in posited. alteration is no which through thing nweg san is knowledge eainta rspoe h om fbigw alwoeadpr.I sthe is It part. and whole call we being of of forms relation the presupposes that relation uhtkn-ati osbe hog hc hn,o,bte,the better, or, thing, a which through possible; thus is taking-part such ncnrs ihtesimple the with contrast in – fi ¬ 7 o.2 2.Shlrrfr otewrso Spinoza, of words the to refers Scheler 92). 2, Vol. 97: oa uget r ae.Tematerial The based. are judgments moral c n eodteshr fkolde h oto hsX hc deter- which X, this of root The knowledge. of sphere the beyond and a priori a ” – “ ob eesrl rentbcueorsbetv nesadn attaches understanding subjective our because not true necessarily be to n nytebeing-thus the only and rmrl h omlzn njdmna omwa sgvni moral in given is what form judgmental in formalizing the primarily receptio fl – c htapasi h aletwr sta ewe ua rationality human between that is work earliest the in appears that ict 7 o.1,45.Temind The 415). 10, Vol. 97: having-part r motn nehc.Shlrpooe odvlpehc under- ethics develop to proposed Scheler ethics. in important are fi Inbegri omtv ue s o xml,peoeasc sjustice, as such phenomena example, for as, rules normative c in nooia relation ontological “ “ known rbeedrReligion der Probleme ” “ ff Shlr1957 (Scheler Mens fteat nthe in acts the of ] fl fa xsigtigi the in thing existing an of csh icvrdwti ua aueadi h world. the in and nature human within discovered he icts ” truth ” eoe a becomes existence or – A SCHELER MAX akaant oeanterior some to again back “ faybigbcmsan becomes being any of mind – [ – Seinsverhältnis 7 o.2 29). 2, Vol. 97: ( nosrainta consfrorstrong our for accounts that observation an “ 45 n reale ens ” “ part receives ” [ Geist ” “ Shlr1957 (Scheler cee 1957 Scheler ; knowing ” priori a ” Shlr1957 (Scheler en o steXo the or X the us for means ] fta which that of hc snecessarily is which ) seta at Shlrue the uses (Scheler facts essential thus ,adi ata ontological an fact in and ], taking-part ” eso nte existing another of ness tutrsmrljudgments moral structures en,truhwhich through being, – – 7 o.2 8.Ethics 88). 2, Vol. 97: “ 7 o.5 9)i its in 197) 5, Vol. 97: “ rt stecriterion the is Truth – n intentionale ens ‘ httranscends that , 7 o.8 203) 8, Vol. 97: necessity “ priori a knows, Love. external ’” otn of content ” being- (Scheler but , ” Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 t rgn slvn ihnamle,adi one in and milieu, a within living as origins its eesrl copne,adcno ebogtt iens steojc fintui- of object it the execution as whose one givenness act-essences of to sense various brought a the be Such tion. of cannot unity and ideal accompanies, necessarily the as exists personhood revelation and grace such which in contexts social and historical the occurs. by God of ( Feeling perception. in given objects given the values, their by are and carried experiences values disvalues, moral the and our upon values directed of these materials of The each priori given. which are dis- to kinds the and feeling, related disvalues, and and of nobility of values order and utility disvalues structured the health the fourthly of common, and values the demonic), fi goodness, and vital or diseased the and profane the thirdly the of truth, disvalues, values evil, beauty, their and of (and value- falsity values sacred highest ugliness, The or spiritual worth. holy the emotions relative the secondly their of human to those according are of values types pure of phenomenology an order identi the structured rather His upon be but insist can emotions. to chaos, the hating, was person not the problem of human this that the dignity of to demonstrates drive solution the his that function founds to desires key cognitive or that The inclinations obligations. goodwill chaotic her rational from the the and person between human Kant in dichotomy h niiul eoe yteterm the by denoted individuals The a through God know to come We ordered. similarly is experience Religious it. by moved feeling- viscerally physical feeling by without music accompanied of be work not a by) may expressed or (or may carried and ( act, mental states a entirely is flv;()i h nvra eeaino h bouebigt esn nprimordial in persons to being absolute and the uni value of are as revelation that world universal acts the the religious in which (2) in love; Amoris, of Ordo to our manifest of becomes experience meaning the In (1) process: rpes codn hmarl stemsegr fGod of messengers the grace as by of role self-revelation form a the via them God according of omnipotent prophets, ideas and of divine articulation the the of in (4) revelation); ural ih fGd rcs htbgn ihteidenti the with begins that process a God, of light sBigi tefo rmrilbig( being primordial or identi itself in Being as al h es-auso laueadpi.Crepnigt hs eesi a is levels these to Corresponding pain. and pleasure of sense-values the nally fi nat ffeigo mto.Feig,lk ecpin,aeitninlacts intentional are perceptions, like Feelings, emotion. or feeling of acts in aino h iientr yaaoywt etrso h ol eni the in seen world the of features with analogy by nature divine the of cation Gefühle revelation .Tu n a nedi eln h euy oiiy n grace and nobility, beauty, the feeling in intend may one Thus ). n 5 ntemdaino mankind of mediation the in (5) and ; fi dadr-nce hnmnlgclyt ieu vertically a us give to phenomenologically re-enacted and ed ’ fi w da unity ideal own s d ooeeu n ipeadistreodarticulation threefold its and simple and homogeneous ed, hlspyo religion of Philosophy fi n se a Ens iesii noeeial n hlgntclyi acts in phylogenetically and ontogenetically spirit nite UEEKELLY EUGENE h person The “ person oidvdas n i God via and individuals, to Ursein 46 – ,a mioet n shl;()i the in (3) holy; as and omnipotent, as ), xeine costm sone as time across experienced ” roAmoris Ordo eypeoeooia xeine as experience, phenomenological defy ’ iestaina calling a as situation life s fi aino o sSii tenat- (the Spirit as God of cation ’ xeineadknowledge and experience s nodro oigand loving of order an , ’ ilt uaiyi the in humanity to will s ’ efrvlto to self-revelation s – ’ ae in fate, s (Scheler fi Fühlen vefold a ) Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 eec ewe xenladitra ecpin xenladitra willing, etc.). internal hating, and and loving external and perception, feeling internal ‘ internal and and external external to between prior is ference itself in which “ su the of awareness ate “ person. another oo n hp sta facpisfra aeteeprclnto fcup of notion empirical the have I as insofar cup a of that as shape given and immediately color is me the to of awareness All sympathetic persons. By immediate among others. the shared of in states be emotional founded may and are values moral community cultural of and forms goods where community, ingful. ymn,adIrcgieadmyrsodeoinlyt h su the to emotionally respond may and recognize I and mind, my one curses one wills, one feels, one perceives, one acts: cognitive nW In 1957 Three eairwe mi eti mtoa tt n h eairo tes onot do I others; of behavior the and state emotional certain a in “ am I when behavior ence noa sIhv miia ocpst eciei.FrShlr hr sno is there Scheler, For it. describe to concepts empirical have I as insofar onaino h oilg fkolde The knowledge. of sociology the of foundation scooia xmnto fte,orsmah ihte,o u oa evalua- the moral by our presupposed or is We them, states (2) with foreign them. sympathy of of our grasping tion them, through Such of person the given. examination with is psychological sympathy of emotion acts the precedes whom givenness their and person, other h mtoso nte esnaeawy ie ome to given always are person another of emotions The ah;w onot do we pathy; cso tesby others of acts xeine.()Teato rsigteeoin fohr ntu yptyi a is sympathy true in others of emotions the grasping of act cognitive The (4) experienced. feel te.Ieprec ypteial h mtossu emotions the sympathetically experience I other. otajb h mtoso ero eeto htIapeedi i nedsuch intend him in apprehend I that rejection or self-su fear of loss of uncertainty, emotions as the values job: a lost founds in The project h xmnto fesnilcaatrsiso yptyrvastefloig (1) following: the reveals sympathy of characteristics essential of examination The ” ” ” nti a,w a xeineeoin htw tews ol o have not would otherwise we that emotions experience may we way, this in ; – or snudFre e Sympathie der Formen und esen esni h ocee tefesniluiyo en fat fdi of acts of being of unity essential itself concrete, the is person 7 o.1,348 10, Vol. 97: ” ’ oteeoinlsae fohrprosbsdo naaoybtenmy between analogy an on based persons other of states emotional the to “ axioms “ l setal di essentially all h wrns fone of awareness The ” c,i hc sgvntemtra otn ftevle neddb the by intended values the of content material the given is which in act, upon yfeigot h te,frhssu his for other, the onto feeling my ” ” h etrs od,adapaacso tes uta h u next cup the as just others, of appearances and words, gestures, the nalteeat,tepro tnsfrha nielunity ideal an as forth stands person the acts, these all In htShlrcniest epeoeooial vdn i tthe at lie evident phenomenologically be to considers Scheler that “ utn usle nterplace their in ourselves putting “ identify maintain ff ff – rn rrjiigo tes ttso te esn r given are persons other of States others. of rejoicing or ering 5 onstepsiiiyo ua life human a of possibility the founds 55) rn acts erent … ” yptyadcommunity and Sympathy “ oilg fknowledge of Sociology ihte.()W a always can We (3) them. with in ’ l seta di essential all esnleitneicroae ayohrknsof kinds other many incorporates existence personal s ” h oegns ftesae nteato resym- true of act the in states the of foreignness the ” h oo n hp fteojc.Ircgiethe recognize I object. the of shape and color the Shlr1957 (Scheler cee ogtthe sought Scheler , A SCHELER MAX ffi iny rinjustice. or ciency, 47 “ sympathy, ff rne nat epcal lotedif- the also (especially acts in erences ff fi – rn sdrcl rsn ome. to present directly is ering s xo ttsta h knowledge the that states axiom rst 7 o.2 382 2, Vol. 97: ” n tepigto attempting and ff ” rdb redwohsjust has who friend a by ered cee eest h immedi- the to refers Scheler priori a as reperform h en fteperson the of being The onaino human of foundation h mtoso that of emotions the ff – rn id fessence, of kinds erent 83). ’ ae n one fate, s ff ’ cee writes, Scheler . being s rn fothers of ering “ h emotional the elwa they what feel “ “ mean- infer- “ in ” Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 esn aeo hi ebrhpi omnt is community a in membership their of have persons gnsi h oms prt n re( fundamental Urge two and of doctrine Spirit, ontological cosmos, an the metaphysics, in on agents manuscripts late the In n uni osiiuled.Esne,t ietetriooyo h Scholastic the of terminology the cite to to Essences, able ends. nonetheless spiritual is life-urge, to , central it the turn resist and to capacity the ebrhpaie eesrl rmore our from necessarily arises membership eoethem, before fcmuiyaecntttd ntelvlo ego-identi di of that level them the through is On it constituted. and are persons, other community of other of givenness possible the to of reference modes without ego the of priori idea the The unify egos. not could we example, andawy htesne r da,adbcm elol noa ste are they as insofar only real become and ideal, are Scheler essences with “ that consistent always is tained position This created. ( Life Universal oilui htcnfse h civmn fhumankind of achievement the foster emotionally can of other that capable unit each becomes social social community experience a the of will occur, increases members members realizing qualitative the its such As When that persons. day. the sense other, his the each Scheler of to in which anthropologists ties of their knowledge of deepen a works entity primitives, the of typical from forms gleans social of variety a founded nweg fojcsi h epcieshrs n wrns fashr sonly is that sphere sphere a the of of awareness and givenness spheres, the respective upon the in possible objects of knowledge 533). 2, omnt hrceie ythe by characterized community ‘ a form would community onstelwr h re ffudto fshrsi sflos 1 h peeof sphere the (1) follows: ( as being-with is of spheres sphere of the foundation (2) of absolute; order the The lower. the founds fl one of sphere the and world, internal peeo the of sphere oe ebr nyi h ihrshr saraygvn hsodri odoubt no is rivers. order This given. already is sphere higher the veri if neither only members lower are orders lower The r ietda oehn hthstename the has that Something a at de directed is are mind human the in are by carried owing The ’ nidpnet prta n niiulcletv person collective individual and spiritual independent, an tutr ftercmuiy h hnmnlg fsmah xiie four exhibited sympathy of phenomenology The community. their of structure … ” third higher Shlr1957 (Scheler n rmtervr ore[epe eltesaaedit hc hyare they which into ahead sea the feel [people] source very their from And second ” fi ” xo ttsta hr are there that states axiom benrpeoeooial vdn.I xrse Scheler expresses It evident. phenomenologically nor able ecpulojcs hyaeeprecduo rwt things. with or upon experienced are they objects; perceptual “ “ u ihte Shlr1957 (Scheler them with but austa a osbewe twsi oepiiiesae The state. primitive more a in was it when possible was than values All-Leben living xs nrlto oteeprclyra hnsnihri hmnor them in neither things real empirically the to relation in exist eahsc n hlspia anthropology philosophical and Metaphysics xo ttsta h ol fidvdasi one pnthe upon founded is individuals of world the that states axiom ” “ – ngnrl 5 h peeo xeddda bet ( objects dead extended of sphere the (5) general; in founded fi 7 o.3 186). 3, Vol. 97: ,adb h boueSii,a h aetm stig are things as time same the at Spirit, Absolute the by and ), e yispioda eetvt otesacred: the to receptivity primordial its by ned “ nt fidpnetsiiuladidvda prta persons spiritual individual and spiritual independent of unity ” “ pntehge,ta s ti osbet rs the grasp to possible is it is, that higher, the upon solidarity UEEKELLY EUGENE ’ Drang w oyadisevrnet 4 the (4) environment; its and body own s 48 Mitwelt quality pee freality of spheres ff ” – rst nf eti ontv cs For acts. cognitive certain unify to orts 7 o.9 0.Te r rae ythe by created are They 90). 9, Vol. 97: fec ebrwt l tes uha Such others. all with member each of ,i rsne.Sii,tog lacking though Spirit, presented. is ), ;()teshrso h xenland external the of spheres the (3) ); fgvneso teswl increase, will others of givenness of ‘ God. ’ hnmnlg,frh main- he for phenomenology, s “ founds ’ priori a ei h e,te r the are they sea, the is He ’ ihs oiia oli a is goal political highest s fi ” ” ie eoealspeci all before given ain o xml,are example, for cation, Shlr1957 (Scheler t h ihrsphere higher The it. nweg fsocial of Knowledge . “ sublimate ff ’ li that claim s rn kinds erent as – “ 7 Vol. 97: spiritual [People] Körper ” urge fi ). a c Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 01:25 30 Sep 2021; For: 9780203816936, chapter3, 10.4324/9780203816936.ch3 hlpBlosser, Philip (1957 M. Scheler, osiu cso h prta at fawrd nml eante oterdrives in their encounter to tied they remain their objects Animals calls the world. Scheler a and what of in goods parts live as the of and spirit phenomenon phenom- identify alone, the the this to in of them In acts able to will. conscious itself are the reveals and that to realm resistance, resistance external of the origi- from phenomenon self-transcendence themselves of the as form world in the A drives, enon, hate). the and love in calls nates Scheler ecstasis spiritual unre the and primordial this Aristotle: sense quotes certain Scheler a in being. is, human the in functional ietcgiintwr hs speci those toward cognition direct 32 an upon n pnu oojcsadgosta r eaiei hi xsec oorlived our to existence their in relative are that goods 1957 and Scheler objects (see to body us open and Catr3) oiia hlspy(hpe 9;Piooh frlgo n theology 57). and (Chapter religion sciences of social Philosophy The 39); 43); (Chapter (Chapter philosophy Political 38); (Chapter xooia tutr ftewrd esiiulz h readfse h Spirit the foster and urge the spiritualize we world, deity. as the coming-to-be e of loving structure our axiological in and essence, drives and the beyond spirit of them leap the that speculates Scheler h hlspiso au n prto a cee n ioa Hartmann Nicolai and Humanism Nota, Scheler of Perrin, H. Ron Ethics Max 1983); An John Herald, of Franciscan 1941); Spirit Chicago (Chicago: Press, and Protectory Value Catholic of the Scheler and 1977), Twayne, Mlake I aqet nvriyPes 97;Egn Kelly, Eugene 1997); Press, University Marquette WI: (Milwaukee, Thinker Great a als rs,17) afe .Frings, S. Manfred 1974); Press, Paulist losDeeken, Alfons uih rnk;Bn:Bouvier. Bonn: Francke; Munich: hnmnlg fCommunity of Phenomenology h uefcsta r iil ntecso,sii n h ieug,aealso are life-urge, the and spirit cosmos, the in visible are that facts pure The – e also See 5.But 35). – otiue oteceto fthe of creation the to contributes Drrct lwr 97;EkadJsp Koehle, Joseph Eckhard 1997); Kluwer, (Dordrecht: “ ecstasis nesbetvt Catr1) au Catr2) oa philosophy Moral 27); (Chapter Value 16); (Chapter Intersubjectivity onto is cognition Scheler – Ptsug:Dqen nvriyPes 95,and 1965), Press, University Duquesne (Pittsburgh: ” rcs n emnnei tis a Scheler Max Ethics: in Permanence and Process 97) ftemn oadiesi t ol.W hr ihteanimals the with share We world. its in items toward mind the of ’ “ rtqeo Kant of Critique s eamleWerke Gesammelte n reale ens tutr n iest:Esy ntePeoeooia hlspyo Max of Philosophy Phenomenological the in Essays Diversity: and Structure – NwYr:S Martin St York: (New everything – fi 7 o.2 393 2, Vol. 97: s ietdtwr rcia bet ytedrives the by objects practical toward directed rst fl ciecncoses(itntfo u o neae to unrelated not but from (distinct consciousness ective TeHge Nijho Hague: (The ” sgvn ua ensaeeetal bet distance to able eventually are beings Human given. is ff ute reading Further ” rst civ nweg fteotlgcland ontological the of knowledge achieve to orts fi ’ Shlr1957 (Scheler A SCHELER MAX Ethics s etrso h ol htcrepn othem, to correspond that world the of features c 5vl,e.M cee n .S rns enand Bern Frings, S. M. and Scheler M. ed. vols, 15 , Reference a cee:ACnieItouto noteWrdof World the into Introduction Concise A Scheler: Max – 5 loShlr1957 Scheler also 95; 49 n se a Ens Ahn,O:Uiest fOi rs,1995); Press, Ohio of University OH: (Athens, “ ’ rs,19) n retW Ranly, W. Ernest and 1991); Press, s environment ff 1966). , – a cee:TeMnadHsWork His and Man The Scheler: Max sproa.I h oeo l being all of love the In personal. as 7 o.9 0.Alcgiinrests cognition All 90). 9, Vol. 97: a Scheler Max esnlt:ASuyAcrigto According Study A Personality: ’ ” oa Philosophy Moral s “ – Shlr1957 (Scheler ntesu fmnthere man of soul the In t blt osay to ability its – h ido a Scheler Max of Mind The 7 o.9 196 9, Vol. 97: ’ ocp ftePerson: the of Concept s a Scheler Max h drives The . Nwo,NJ: (Newton, – 7 o.9, Vol. 97: NwYork: (New “ (Boston: Scheler no – 200). ” to ’ ’ s s