Aenictus Seletarius, a New Species of Hypogaeic Army

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aenictus Seletarius, a New Species of Hypogaeic Army A N N A L E S Z O O L O G I C I (Warszawa), 2016, 66(1): 35-42 AENICTUS SELETARIUS, A NEW SPECIES OF HYPOGAEIC ARMY ANT FROM SINGAPORE, WITH AN UPDATED KEY TO THE AENICTUS MINUTULUS SPECIES GROUP (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE: DORYLINAE) FROM SOUTHEAST ASIA MARK K. L. WONG1 and BENOIT GUÉNARD2, * 1National Parks Board, Singapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong; e-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract.— A new species of the army ant genus Aenictus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dorylinae) is described. Aenictus seletarius sp. nov., belonging to the Aenictus minutulus species group, was discovered from a single subterranean pitfall trap in Singapore. Like A. subterraneus and A. changmaianus in this species group, A. seletarius displays substantial variation in body size within the worker caste. An updated key to the Aenictus minutulus species group from Southeast Asia is presented. ± Key words.— Aenictus, army ant, body size variation, Malay Peninsula, Singapore INTRODUCTION Guinea and Australia (Fig. 1; also see www.antmaps. org). Globally, Southeast Asia supports the greatest Among all 18 genera of the monophyletic army ant diversity of Aenictus species, with a total of 118 spe- cies (antmaps.org) comprising all twelve species subfamily Dorylinae (Brady et al. 2014), the genus groups that have been established for the genus (Jai- Aenictus Shuckard, 1840 is the most diverse, compris- trong and Yamane 2011). ing a total of 184 valid species including the present The Aenictus minutulus species group includes addition and 30 valid subspecies (Bolton 2015). Most relatively small-sized species, measuring 1.80–3.20 mm Aenictus species are specialized predators of other in total body length. Based on the latest revision by ant genera (Gotwald 1995, Shattuck 2008, Jaitrong and Jaitrong and Hashimoto (2012), the group is restricted Yamane 2011, Jaitrong et al. 2012, Hashimoto and to Southeast Asia where it is represented by six spe- Yamane 2014), although the remains of spiders, flies cies: Aenictus changmaianus Terayama et Kubota, and woodlice have been recorded in the nests of Aenic- 1993 (Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia), Aenictus tus gracilis Emery, 1893 (Hirosawa et al. 2000). Like minimus Jaitrong et Hashimoto, 2012 (Vietnam), Ae- other army ants, members of Aenictus are obligate col- nictus minutulus Terayama et Yamane, 1989 (Thai- lective foragers and utilise strategies of mass raiding land, Sumatra and Java), Aenictus peguensis Emery, to attack and overpower their prey. The genus Aenic- 1895 (Vietnam and Myanmar), Aenictus subterra- tus is widely distributed throughout the Old World neus Jaitrong et Hashimoto, 2012 (Borneo) and an tropics and subtropics, from Africa to the Middle East, undescribed morphospecies Aenictus sp. 56 of WJT India and Pakistan, South China, Southeast Asia, New (Borneo and Java). Here we describe Aenictus PL ISSN 0003-4541 © Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS doi: 10.3161/00034541ANZ2016.66.1.002 36 M. K. L. WONG and B. GUÉNARD seletarius sp. nov. from Singapore, a new addition to WL – Weber’s Length of Mesosoma. Maximum diago- the A. minutulus species group that displays substan- nal distance in lateral view, from base of anteri- tial variation in the body size of its worker caste, from or slope of pronotum to metapleural lobe; four individuals collected in a single subterranean pit- PNH –Pronotum Height. Maximum height of prono- fall trap. We describe A. seletarius from the worker tum, measured in profile from the posterior caste and provide an updated key to Southeast Asian base of the lateral sides of pronotum, where species of the A. minutulus group. procoxa is attached, to the highest point of the pronotum; PNW –Pronotal Width. Maximum width of pronotum MATERIAL AND METHODS measured in dorsal view; PTL –Petiole Length. Maximum diagonal length of Abbreviations of the type depositories and other petiole, measured in lateral view, from most material are as follows: anteroventral point of the peduncle, at or below LKCNHM – Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, the propodeal lobe, to most posterodorsal point Singapore. of tergite; SBSHKU – Insect Biodiversity and Biogeography Lab- PTH – Petiole Height. Maximum height of petiole, oratory, School of Biological Sciences, The measured in lateral view, from the highest University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. (median) point of the node, orthogonally to the Photographs of specimens were obtained with an ventral outline of the node; incorporated digital camera, Leica DFC450, mounted PTW – Petiole Width. Maximum width of the petiole in on a Leica M205C dissecting microscope through the dorsal view; Leica Application Suite V4 software. A total of 14 to 45 PPL –Postpetiole Length. Maximum length of post- images were taken and stacked together. Measure- petiole, measured in lateral view; ments of specimens were taken in mm (accurate to PPH –Postpetiole Height. Maximum height of post- 0.001 mm and rounded to the nearest 20.01 mm for petiole, measured in lateral view from the high- presentation) with the Measure Tools function of the est point of the node; Leica Application Suite V4 software on imaged speci- PPW – Postpetiole Width. Maximum width of the post- mens after proper placement for each body part meas- petiole in dorsal view; ured. Measurements and morphological terminology CI – Cephalic Index. Calculated as: HW / HL × 100. follow: Jaitrong and Hashimoto (2012) for HW, HL and SI – Scape Index. Calculated as: SL / HW × 100; SL; Fischer et al. (2014) for PNH and PTH; Baroni MaI – Mandibular Index. Calculated as: MaL / HW × Urbani (1977) for PI and PPI. 100; PI – Petiolar Index. Calculated as: PTW / PTL × 100; The abbreviations used for the measurements and PPI – Postpetiolar Index. Calculated as: PPW / PPL × indices are as follows: 100. HW – Head Width. Maximum width of head in full-face view; HL – Head Length. Maximum head length in full-face SYSTEMATICS view, measured from the anterior clypeal mar- gin to the midpoint of a line drawn across the Aenictus minutulus species group posterior margin of head; MaL – Mandible Length. Maximum length of mandible Diagnosis. The A. minutulus species group was from the anterolateral margin of clypeus at out- established by Jaitrong and Hashimoto (2012) from er side of mandibular insertion to mandibular their redefinition and renaming of the Aenictus pier- apex; cei species group (Jaitrong and Yamane 2011). From SL – Scape Length. Maximum measurable length of the A. piercei species group, Jaitrong and Hashimoto scape, from the proximal point of scape shaft to removed two species (Aenictus piercei Wheeler et the distal end of scape, excluding the basal of Chapman, 1930; Aenictus lifuiae Terayama, 1984) constriction and condylar bulb; and added two new species and one undescribed mor- TL –Total Length. Maximum length of specimen phospecies (see synoptic species list of A. minutulus measured from the tip of the mandibles to the species group below). Jaitrong and Hashimoto (2012) tip of the abdominal segment VII, not including define the A. minutulus species group as follows: sting. Due to the position of the specimen, total “Head in full-face view with occipital corner con- length was measured as the sum of head length vex, and posterior margin almost straight to shallow- + thorax, petiole and postpetiole length + ly and broadly concave; occipital margin lacking col- gaster length; lar. Antenna 10-segmented; antennal scape short, A NEW SPECIES OF AENICTUS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE: DORYLINAE) FROM SINGAPORE 37 reaching only midlength of head. Anterior clypeal mar- –. In full-face view posterior margin of head almost gin roundly convex, lacking denticles. Mandible subtri- straight or feebly concave; propodeal junction angular; its masticatory margin with a large apical roundly angulated; smaller species (TL 2.10–2.15 tooth, medium-sized subapical and basal teeth, and 2–6 mm; HW 0.48–0.50 mm) (Borneo) . denticles between them; basal margin of mandible with . A. subterraneus Jaitrong et Hashimoto conspicuous denticles. Frontal carina short; para- 4. Basal margin of mandible with 1–2 small denticles frontal ridge absent. With mesosoma in profile prome- next to large basal tooth and followed by a larger sonotum convex dorsally and sloping gradually to the denticle (North Vietnam) . propodeum; metapleural groove present or absent . A. minimus Jaitrong et Hashimoto (mesonotum and propodeum fused); propodeal junc- –. Basal margin of mandible with 3–5 denticles that tion angular. Subpetiolar process well developed, trian- gradually reduce in size toward base of man- gular or subrectangular. Head and first gastral seg- dible . 5 ment entirely smooth and shiny. Body yellowish brown 5. Head square-shaped and almost as wide as long (CI to reddish brown; typhlatta spot absent. Size variation 91–96); antennal scape relatively short (SI 61–64); occurs among individuals from single colonies.” polymorphic worker caste with largest individuals exceeding 3.10 mm in TL (Singapore) . A. seletarius sp. n. Synoptic species list of A. minutulus species –. Head longer than wide (CI < 90); antennal scape rel- group from Southeast Asia atively long (SI 67–72); relatively smaller species (TL < 2.60 mm) . 6 Aenictus changmaianus Terayama et Kubota, 6. Metapleural gland bulla relatively large; distance 1993 (Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia); between propodeal spiracle and metapleural gland Aenictus minimus Jaitrong et Hashimoto, 2012 bulla shorter than or almost as long as spiracular (North Vietnam); diameter (Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia) . Aenictus minutulus Terayama et Yamane, 1989 . A. changmaianus Terayama et Kubota (Thailand, Sumatra, Java); –. Metapleural gland bulla relatively small; distance Aenictus peguensis Emery, 1895 (Vietnam, Myan- between propodeal spiracle and metapleural gland mar); bulla clearly longer than spiracular diameter (Thai- Aenictus seletarius sp. nov. (Singapore); land, Java and Sumatra) . Aenictus sp. 56 of WJT Jaitrong et Hashimoto, 2012 . A. minutulus Terayama et Yamane (Borneo, Java); Aenictus subterraneus Jaitrong et Hashimoto, 2012 (Borneo). DESCRIPTION OF NEW SPECIES Updated key to A.
Recommended publications
  • The Army Ant Aenictus Silvestrii and Its Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description of a New Species
    Entomological Science (2010) 13, 328–333 doi:10.1111/j.1479-8298.2010.00385.x ORIGINAL ARTICLE The army ant Aenictus silvestrii and its related species in Southeast Asia, with a description of a new species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae)ens_385 328..333 Weeyawat JAITRONG1,2 and Seiki YAMANE1 1Department of Natural Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan; and 2Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand Abstract Three species of Aenictus with reduced numbers of antennal segments (8–9) occur in Southeast Asia: A. jarujini sp. nov., A. latifemoratus and A. silvestrii. Aenictus latifemoratus is new to Java and Borneo, while A. silvestrii is recorded for the first time from Borneo. Key words: Aenictus jarujini sp. nov., army ants, southeast Asia, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION & Yamane (1989) (Sumatra, Indonesia); Terayama & Kubota (1993) (Vietnam and Thailand); Yamane The genus Aenictus Shuckard, 1840 (subfamily Aenicti- & Hashimoto (1999) (Sarawak, Borneo); Shattuck nae) is one of the large ant genera in the world. Currently (2008) (Australia). Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata (2005) 149 valid species and subspecies are listed (Bolton et al. listed the known species of Thailand. 2006). They are mainly distributed in the Old World During our survey on the Asian species of Aenictus, tropics and subtropics, from Africa through the Middle we have recognized a well-defined species group of three East, India, South China, southernmost part of Japan, Southeast Asian species comprising the two species various countries in Southeast Asia to New Guinea and above mentioned and a new species from Thailand. In Australia (Gotwald 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Ant Aenictus Hottai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) and Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description Of
    557 The Army AntAenictus hottai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) and Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description of a New Species by Decha Wiwatwitaya1 & Weeyawat Jaitrong2, 3 ABSTRACT The Aenictus hottai group is established to include two species (a named and a new species) occurring in Southeast Asia: Aenictus hottai Terayama et Yamane, 1989 and Aenictus yamanei Wiwatwitaya et Jaitrong, sp. nov. Both are probably restricted to Sundaland and inhabit lowland primary forests. Key words: Taxonomy, Formicidae, Aenictinae, Aenictus yamanei, army ants, new species. INTRODUCTION Currently 95 species are listed in the army ant genus Aenictus from the Oriental, Indo-Australian, and Australasian regions (Jaitrong & Eguchi 2010; Bolton 2011). Among them 67 species are known only from the worker caste. All of those species except one have a smooth and shining gaster. The species with a finely reticulated gaster, Aenictus hottai Terayama et Yamane, 1989, is also characterized by a well-developed subpetiolar process with a poster- oventrally produced arm, and is found only in Southeast Asia (Terayama & Yamane 1989; Rościszewski & Mashchwitz 1994; Malsch et al. 2003; Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata 2005). In the course of our examination of Aenictus specimens collected from Southeast Asia, we found another species from Malay Peninsula and Sarawak that is closely related to A. hottai but is much smaller than the latter. In this paper we describe this ant as a new species based on the worker caste and both species are classified into the Aenictus hottai group herein established. 1 Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand, E-mail: [email protected] 2 Thailand Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand, E-mail: [email protected] 3 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 8900065, Japan 558 Sociobiology Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Species of the Army Ant Genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) from Borneo and the Philippines
    Z.Arb.Gem.Öst.Ent. 62 115-125 Wien, 19. 11. 2010 ISSN 0375-5223 Three new species of the army ant genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) from Borneo and the Philippines Herbert ZETTEL & Daniela Magdalena SORGER Abstract Descriptions of three new species of army ants are provided: Aenictus pfeifferi sp.n. from Sarawak, Borneo; Aenictus pangantihoni sp.n. from Camiguin, the Philippines; and Aenictus carolianus sp.n. from Cebu, the Philippines. Key words: Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Aenictus, army ants, new species, taxonomy, Philippines, Malaysia, Borneo, Cebu, Camiguin. Zusammenfassung Diese Arbeit liefert die Beschreibungen von drei Ameisenarten aus der Unterfamilie der Aenictinae (Treiberameisen): Aenictus pfeifferi sp.n. wird aus Sarawak, Borneo, beschrie- ben, Aenictus pangantihoni sp.n. von der Insel Camiguin, Philippinen, und Aenictus caro- lianus sp.n. von der Insel Cebu, Philippinen. Introduction The islands in the western Pacific region still yield a wealth of undescribed ant species. Despite the interesting biology of army ants – a review was published by KRONAUER (2009) – their taxonomy and zoogeography are poorly studied and need much more atten- tion. To our knowledge, the “true” army ants of the genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (sub- family Aenictinae) are remarkably specious in the region. The described species are often recorded from a single island; this might be either an effect of reduced dispersal abilities or just a lack of information. Since WILSON’s (1964) taxonomic revision only a few species have been described from Southeast Asia, including one from Borneo (YAMANE & HASHIMOTO 1999), but none from the Philippines. In our present study we describe three species.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRUE ARMY ANTS of the INDO-AUSTRALIAN AREA (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dorylinae)
    Pacific Insects 6 (3) : 427483 November 10, 1964 THE TRUE ARMY ANTS OF THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN AREA (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dorylinae) By Edward O. Wilson BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES, HARVARD UNIVERSITY, CAMBRIDGE, MASS., U. S. A. Abstract: All of the known Indo-Australian species of Dorylinae, 4 in Dorylus and 34 in Aenictus, are included in this revision. Eight of the Aenictus species are described as new: artipus, chapmani, doryloides, exilis, huonicus, nganduensis, philiporum and schneirlai. Phylo­ genetic and numerical analyses resulted in the discarding of two extant subgenera of Aenictus (Typhlatta and Paraenictus) and the loose clustering of the species into 5 informal " groups" within the unified genus Aenictus. A consistency test for phylogenetic characters is discussed. The African and Indo-Australian doryline species are compared, and available information in the biology of the Indo-Australian species is summarized. The " true " army ants are defined here as equivalent to the subfamily Dorylinae. Not included are species of Ponerinae which have developed legionary behavior independently (see Wilson, E. O., 1958, Evolution 12: 24-31) or the subfamily Leptanillinae, which is very distinct and may be independent in origin. The Dorylinae are not as well developed in the Indo-Australian area as in Africa and the New World tropics. Dorylus itself, which includes the famous driver ants, is centered in Africa and sends only four species into tropical Asia. Of these, the most widespread reaches only to Java and the Celebes. Aenictus, on the other hand, is at least as strongly developed in tropical Asia and New Guinea as it is in Africa, with 34 species being known from the former regions and only about 15 from Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Borowiec Et Al-2020 Ants – Phylogeny and Classification
    A Ants: Phylogeny and 1758 when the Swedish botanist Carl von Linné Classification published the tenth edition of his catalog of all plant and animal species known at the time. Marek L. Borowiec1, Corrie S. Moreau2 and Among the approximately 4,200 animals that he Christian Rabeling3 included were 17 species of ants. The succeeding 1University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA two and a half centuries have seen tremendous 2Departments of Entomology and Ecology & progress in the theory and practice of biological Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, classification. Here we provide a summary of the NY, USA current state of phylogenetic and systematic 3Social Insect Research Group, Arizona State research on the ants. University, Tempe, AZ, USA Ants Within the Hymenoptera Tree of Ants are the most ubiquitous and ecologically Life dominant insects on the face of our Earth. This is believed to be due in large part to the cooperation Ants belong to the order Hymenoptera, which also allowed by their sociality. At the time of writing, includes wasps and bees. ▶ Eusociality, or true about 13,500 ant species are described and sociality, evolved multiple times within the named, classified into 334 genera that make up order, with ants as by far the most widespread, 17 subfamilies (Fig. 1). This diversity makes the abundant, and species-rich lineage of eusocial ants the world’s by far the most speciose group of animals. Within the Hymenoptera, ants are part eusocial insects, but ants are not only diverse in of the ▶ Aculeata, the clade in which the ovipos- terms of numbers of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization in Ants
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU Student Theses and Dissertations 2020 Hybridization in Ants Ian Butler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/ student_theses_and_dissertations Part of the Life Sciences Commons HYBRIDIZATION IN ANTS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Rockefeller University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Ian Butler June 2020 © Copyright by Ian Butler 2020 HYBRIDIZATION IN ANTS Ian Butler, Ph.D. The Rockefeller University 2020 Interspecific hybridization is a relatively common occurrence within all animal groups. Two main factors make hybridization act differently in ants than in other species: eusociality and haplodiploidy. These factors serve to reduce the costs of interspecific hybridization in ants while simultaneously allowing them to take advantage of certain benefits. Eusociality may mitigate the effects of hybridization by allowing hybrids to be shunted into the worker caste, potentially reducing the effects of hybrid sterility. In haplodiploid species, males do not have a father. They instead develop from unfertilized eggs as haploid clones of their mother. This means that interspecifically mated queens do not completely sacrifice reproductive potential even if all hybrids are sterile because they can still produce fertile males. These factors in turn suggest that hybridization should be more common among the social Hymenoptera than other animal groups. Nevertheless, current data suggest that ants hybridize at rates similar to other animal groups, although these data are limited. Furthermore, there is a large amount of overlap between cases of interspecific hybridization and cases of genetic caste determination. A majority of the cases in ants where caste is determined primarily by genotype are associated with hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms for the Evolution of Superorganismality in Ants
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU Student Theses and Dissertations 2021 Mechanisms for the Evolution of Superorganismality in Ants Vikram Chandra Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/ student_theses_and_dissertations Part of the Life Sciences Commons MECHANISMS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF SUPERORGANISMALITY IN ANTS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Rockefeller University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Vikram Chandra June 2021 © Copyright by Vikram Chandra 2021 MECHANISMS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF SUPERORGANISMALITY IN ANTS Vikram Chandra, Ph.D. The Rockefeller University 2021 Ant colonies appear to behave as superorganisms; they exhibit very high levels of within-colony cooperation, and very low levels of within-colony conflict. The evolution of such superorganismality has occurred multiple times across the animal phylogeny, and indeed, origins of multicellularity represent the same evolutionary process. Understanding the origin and elaboration of superorganismality is a major focus of research in evolutionary biology. Although much is known about the ultimate factors that permit the evolution and persistence of superorganisms, we know relatively little about how they evolve. One limiting factor to the study of superorganismality is the difficulty of conducting manipulative experiments in social insect colonies. Recent work on establishing the clonal raider ant, Ooceraea biroi, as a tractable laboratory model, has helped alleviate this difficulty. In this dissertation, I study the proximate evolution of superorganismality in ants. Using focussed mechanistic experiments in O. biroi, in combination with comparative work from other ant species, I study three major aspects of ant social behaviour that provide insight into the origin, maintenance, and elaboration of superorganismality.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Observation of Honeydew Foraging in Army Ants Since 1933: Aenictus Hodgsoni Forel, 1901 Tending Eutrichosiphum Heterot
    ASIAN MYRMECOLOGY Volume 6, 115–118, 2014 ISSN 1985-1944 © MICHAEL STAAB SHORT COMMUNICATION The first observation of honeydew foraging in army ants since 1933: Aenictus hodgsoni Forel, 1901 tending Eutrichosiphum heterotrichum (Raychaudhuri, 1956) in Southeast China MICHAEL STAAB Ecosystem Function Group, Institute of Ecology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Scharnhorststraße 1, D-21335 Lüneburg, Germany Current address: Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, D-79106 Freiburg Phone: +49 (0)761 203-67787 Fax: +49 (0)761 203-3638 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Aenictus, army ants, trophobiosis, honeydew, BEF-China Army ants are a well-defined group of ants trophobiotic interactions in the field sites of the characterized by a set of behavioural and newly established BEF-China tree plantation ecological adaptations including a nomadic experiment close to the village of Xingangshan, life style with temporary bivouac nests, highly Jiangxi Province, in subtropical Southeast China specialized mating systems, and mass raiding (117° 55’49” E / 29° 5’ 13” N, Bruelheide for arthropod prey (Gotwald 1995, Kronauer et al. 2014). Ant and aphid specimens were 2009). The monogeneric subfamily Aenictinae is identified with the keys provided by Jaitrong & restricted to tropical and subtropical ecosystems Yamane (2011) and Blackman & Eastop (2012) in the Old World and Australia (Guénard et al. respectively. Voucher specimens were lodged in 2010). As far as the trophic ecology of Aenictus is the insect collection of the University of Freiburg. known, almost all species are specialized predators Close observation of single aphids revealed that of other ants (Gotwald 1995, Kronauer 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Taxonomy of the West Palaearctic Aenictinae Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    ANNALES ZOOLOGICI (Warszawa), 2004, 54(2): 361-364 ON THE TAXONOMY OF THE WEST PALAEARCTIC AENICTINAE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) NIHAT AKTAÇ1, ALEXANDER G. RADCHENKO2 and KADRI KIRAN1 1 Trakya University, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Department of Biology, 22030 Edirne, Turkey; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.— The types of several Aenictus species are studied, and differences between A. rhodiensis Menozzi and related species, A. dlusskyi Arnoldi and A. vaucheri Emery shown. A. maroccanus Santschi is excluded from the genus Aenictus Shuchard, 1840. A first record of Aenictus rhodiensis from Turkey is reported. Key words.— Ants, taxonomy, faunistic, Aenictinae, Ecitoninae, Palaearctic Region. INTRODUCTION Genus Aenictus Shuckard, 1840 belongs to the monotypic ant subfamily Aenictinae. Previously Aenictinae Emery, 1901 and Ecitoninae Forel, 1893 were considered as tribes of the subfamily Dorylinae Leach, 1815, but Bolton (1990) sepa- rated Aenictinae from Dorylinae. Members of these three subfamilies, together with subfamily Cerapchyinae Forel, 1893, are collectively referred as “army ants” (or sometimes “driver ants” or “legionary ants”). All are predators, which do not have permanent nests and are nomadic (for details see Wheeler 1910, Gotwald 1982, 1995, Hölldobler and Wilson 1990). Their reproductive queens have extremely enlarged gaster and often cannot move without the help of workers. Most of species live in the tropical regions of the Old World (Aenictinae and Dorylinae), New World Aenictus ■ Dorylus Aenictus and Dorylus (Ecitoninae) or are pan-tropical (Cerapachyinae). ● A. rhodiensis ▲ A. dlusskyi A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Remarkable New Species of the Army Ant Genus Polymorphlc
    TROPICS Vol. 8 (a): 427-432 Issued May, 1999 A Remarkable New Species of the Army Ant Genus Aenlctus (H5rmenopter:a, Formicldael wtth a polymorphlc Worker Caste Seiki YmlUVn Department of Eanh and Envhronmental Scienccs, Faculty of Sciencc, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 89G0065, Iapan Yoshiaki HASHI}IOTO laboratory of Phylogenetics, the Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo, Sanda 669-l5zt6, Japan ABSTRACT A new species of the army ant genus Aenictus is described from Sarawak, East Malaysia. This Bomean species is remarkablc in having a polymorphic workcr caste, and an inflatcd propodeum filled with red liquid in larger workers. The smaller workeis possess narnower heads with the sides almost parallel, very shon antennae and lcgs, and normal propodea. They were few in number and their function in colony onganization is not known. Key V9ords: anny ant I Aenictus / new species / Borneo / polymorphism. Since the establishment of the genus Aenictus (Shuckard,1840), its worker caste has been believed to be monomorphic in all the members of the genus (Wilson, 1964; Gotwatd, 1995). In our experience in some species there is a recognizable size variation in the worker within a single colony and sometimes between different colonies of the supposedly same species, though polymorphism of usual sense (Wilson, 1953) has not been noticed, that is, the change is gradual without distinct allometric transformation. In March 1997 during a night walk in the jungle we found a raiding column of a strange yellowish army ant in the Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak, Bomeo (cf. Hashimoto & Yamane, in prep.). Surprisingly the workers had distinctly inflated propodea that were filled up with a red liquid.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) from the African Continent Abdulmeneem Joma University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected]
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2014-01-01 Revision of the Ant Genus Bothroponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) From the African Continent Abdulmeneem Joma University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Joma, Abdulmeneem, "Revision of the Ant Genus Bothroponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) From the African Continent" (2014). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1267. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1267 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVISION OF THE ANT GENUS BOTHROPONERA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE: PONERINAE) FROM THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Abdulmeneem M. Alnour Joma Department of Biological Sciences APPROVED: William P. Mackay, Ph.D., Chair Carl S. Lieb, Ph.D. Eli Greenbaum, Ph.D. Michael Moody, Ph.D. Richard Langford, Ph.D. Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Abdulmeneem M. Alnour Joma 2014 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my family, to my parents Mohamed Alnour and Khadija Mohamed Ali, who raised me and encouraged me thoroughout my life to be able to achieve the highest level of education. To my wife Hawa Algatroni and children Rawan and Mustafa, who always supported me wherever my study took me, filling my life with love and patience. To my brothers: Abdalrahman, Mahmoud, Abdalnour, Ali, Ibrahim and my sisters: Aisha, Fatima, Zainab, Zohra, Imbarka, Mouna, who did not neglect any opportunity to encourage me to continue my scientific journey at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Evan P. Economo Professor Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit ( Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
    1 Evan P. Economo Professor Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit (http://arilab.unit.oist.jp/) Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University 1919-1 Tancha Onna-son +81 098-982-3328 Okinawa, 904-0495 [email protected] JAPAN Citizenship: USA, Canada EDUCATION 2009 Ph.D. University of Texas at Austin. Ecology, Evolution, & Behavior. 2002 B.S. University of Arizona. Ecology & Evolutionary Biology. APPOINTMENTS Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University 2020 - present Professor, Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit 2019 - present Associate Ombudsperson 2012 - 2020 Assistant Professor, Principal Investigator, Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit 2011 - 2012 Visiting Assistant Professor University of Michigan 2012 - 2017 Visiting Assistant Prof., Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Bio., Museum of Zoology 2009 - 2012 Postdoctoral Fellow - Michigan Society of Fellows Assistant Prof. (non tenure-track)- Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology PUBLICATIONS Book Sarnat, E.M., & Economo, E.P. (2012). The Ants of Fiji. University of California Press. (400 pages) 2 Journal Articles Published | In Press 95. Richter, A., Keller, R. A., Hita Garcia, F., Billen, J., Katzke, J., Boudinot, B. E., Economo, E.P.*, Beutel, R.G.* (In Press) Head anatomy of Protanilla lini (Leptanillinae, Formicidae, Hymenoptera) and a hypothesis of their mandibular movement. Myrmecological News. *joint supervision 94. Casadei-Ferreira, A., Friedman, N.R., Economo, E.P., Pie, M.R., Feitosa, R.M., (In Press) Head and mandible shapes are highly integrated yet represent two distinct modules within and among worker sub-castes of the ant genus Pheidole. Ecology & Evolution. 93. Booher, D., Gibson, J., Liu, C., Longino, J.T., Fisher, B.L., Janda, M., Narula, N., Toulkeridou, E., Mikheyev, A.S., Suarez, A., Economo, E.P.
    [Show full text]