Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) from the African Continent Abdulmeneem Joma University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) from the African Continent Abdulmeneem Joma University of Texas at El Paso, Amjoma@Miners.Utep.Edu University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2014-01-01 Revision of the Ant Genus Bothroponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) From the African Continent Abdulmeneem Joma University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Joma, Abdulmeneem, "Revision of the Ant Genus Bothroponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) From the African Continent" (2014). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1267. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1267 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVISION OF THE ANT GENUS BOTHROPONERA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE: PONERINAE) FROM THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Abdulmeneem M. Alnour Joma Department of Biological Sciences APPROVED: William P. Mackay, Ph.D., Chair Carl S. Lieb, Ph.D. Eli Greenbaum, Ph.D. Michael Moody, Ph.D. Richard Langford, Ph.D. Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Abdulmeneem M. Alnour Joma 2014 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my family, to my parents Mohamed Alnour and Khadija Mohamed Ali, who raised me and encouraged me thoroughout my life to be able to achieve the highest level of education. To my wife Hawa Algatroni and children Rawan and Mustafa, who always supported me wherever my study took me, filling my life with love and patience. To my brothers: Abdalrahman, Mahmoud, Abdalnour, Ali, Ibrahim and my sisters: Aisha, Fatima, Zainab, Zohra, Imbarka, Mouna, who did not neglect any opportunity to encourage me to continue my scientific journey at all times. A special dedication goes to my supervisor, Professor William Mackay, who transferred his experience in the field of myrmecology to me, opened his laboratory for my use to complete my research and supported me during my time at UTEP. REVISION OF THE ANT GENUS BOTHROPONERA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE: PONERINAE) FROM THE AFRICAN CONTINENT by Abdulmeneem M. Alnour Joma, BSc, MSc DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biological Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2014 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the curators and museums who provided me with ant specimens including Dr. Claire Villemant (MNHN), Dr. Bernhard Merz (MHNG), Drs. Stefan Cover, Jignasha Rana, Linda Ford, Philip Perkins, Jack Boyle, Charles Whittemore Farnum (MCZC), Drs. Frank Koch, Viola Richter (ZMHU), Drs. Roberto Poggi, Giuliano Doria, Maria Tavano (MCSN), Drs. Isabelle Zürcher-Pfander, Daniel Burckhardt (NHMB), Drs. Gavin Broad, Suzanne Ryder (BMNH), Drs. James Carpenter, Christine LeBeau (AMNH), Drs. Weiping Xie, Laura McGover (LACM) and Drs. Dawn Larsen and Aisha Mayekiso (SAM). Special thanks are due to Dr. Gary Alpert who offered to take photos of the Bothroponera species and allowed lodging during the study period at the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Dr. Alain Dejean provided several publications on African ants, Drs. Hamish Robertson and Robert Taylor provided their ant publication websites, Dr. Brigitte Braschler offered useful information about African ant richness and biodiversity and Dr. Nigel Worden offered historical information about South Africa. I also would like to thank Dr. Barry Bolton, who suggested useful comments for ant character descriptions and identifications and reviewed the manuscript. Dr. Brian Fisher allowed me to use figures from Antweb (http://www.antweb.org/), and photographed B. umgodikulula. Dr. Brian Taylor allowed me to use the information from his website, The Ants of Africa (http://antsofafrica.org/). Dr. Sulaiman Abushagur offered advice during my study and made important suggestions for the research. I also would like to thank Dr. Robert Kirken, Chairman of the Department of Biological Sciences of the University of Texas at El Paso who facilitated procedures to borrow specimens from SAM, Dr. Elizabeth Walsh, doctoral advisor, who encouraged me and assisted me with paperwork, and also supported me economically, Dr. William Mackay, PhD advisor as well as the doctoral committee members Dr. Carl Lieb, Dr. Eli Greenbaum, Dr. Michael Moody, Dr. Mahesh Narayan. Thanks also due to Dr. Shawn Dash and Dr. Jerry Johnson, for assistance and useful suggestions. This research was supported by the Libyan Ministry of Higher Education, Libyan-North American Scholarship Program, and the Canadian Bureau for International Education. v Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ vi List of Maps ................................................................................................................................................ ix List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. x List of Plates ............................................................................................................................................. xii Chapter 1. Revision of the African ants of the Bothroponera pumicosa species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) ....................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................................... 5 Genus Bothroponera Mayr, 1862 ....................................................................................................... 8 Comparison of Bothroponera with Pachycondyla and similar genera ............................................. 10 Bothroponera pumicosa species complex description ..................................................................... 12 Key to the Afrotropical Bothroponera species complexes ............................................................... 13 Key to the Bothroponera pumicosa species complex ....................................................................... 14 Species accounts of members of the Afrotropical Bothroponera pumicosa species complex ......... 16 Bothroponera aspera Arnold, stat. nov. ........................................................................................... 16 Bothroponera berthoudi (Forel) revived status ................................................................................ 21 Bothroponera cariosa Emery ........................................................................................................... 27 Bothroponera cavernosa (Roger) ..................................................................................................... 32 Bothroponera granosa (Roger) ........................................................................................................ 36 Bothroponera laevissima (Arnold) .................................................................................................. 42 Bothroponera montivaga Arnold, stat. nov. ..................................................................................... 46 Bothroponera pumicosa (Roger) ...................................................................................................... 51 Bothroponera strigulosa Emery ....................................................................................................... 56 Bothroponera umgodikulula Joma and Mackay ............................................................................... 61 References ......................................................................................................................................... 75 Chapter 2. Revision of the African ants of the Bothroponera sulcata species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) ..................................................................................................................... 81 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 81 vi Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 82 Methods and materials (refer to chapter 1) ....................................................................................... 83 B. sulcata species complex ............................................................................................................... 83 Key to Bothroponera sulcata species complex ................................................................................ 85 Diagnosis for each species of B. sulcata species complex ..............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Turkish Journal of Biodiversity
    Turkish Journal of Biodiversity Turk J Biod, March 2020, 3(1): 21-31 https://doi.org/10.38059/biodiversity.698157 Journal homepage: http://turkbiod.artvin.edu.tr/ http://dergipark.gov.tr/biodiversity e-ISSN:2667-4386 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Diversity of ants species in different habitat mosaics of Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Indian Botanical Garden (Howrah, West Bengal, India) Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Hindistan Botanik Bahçesi'nin (Howrah, Batı Bengal, Hindistan) farklı yaşam alanı mozaiklerinde karınca türlerinin çeşitliliği Arka GOSWAMI a* , Arijit CHATTERJEE a , Sheela SAROJ b a Department of Environmental Science, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India b Zoological Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Kolkata, India Article Info ABSTRACT ©2020 Ali Nihat Gökyiğit Botanical Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) occupy a wide range of ecological niches and exploit various food Garden Application and Research resources either as herbivores or as predators or scavengers. This study establishes the diversity of Center of Artvin Coruh University. ants in an ex-situ conservation site dedicated for plants known as Indian Botanical garden situated amidst a congested city. It also documents the relation of ant community structure with different *Corresponding author: habitat mosaics present within this protected area. For this study pit fall trap was used as collection e-mail:[email protected] method and amalgamated within quadrat sampling (total 16 quadrats and each quadrat contains 9 ORCID: 0000-0002-8932-5113 pit fall traps placed uniformly) distributed in four different habitats and repeated in two consecutive Article history months. All the specimens were collected, preserved and identified meticulously. Total 27 species of Received: March 3, 2012 ants from 19 genera and 6 subfamilies are documented from the whole study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Discovered Sister Lineage Sheds Light on Early Ant Evolution
    Newly discovered sister lineage sheds light on early ant evolution Christian Rabeling†‡§, Jeremy M. Brown†¶, and Manfred Verhaagh‡ †Section of Integrative Biology, and ¶Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas, 1 University Station C0930, Austin, TX 78712; and ‡Staatliches Museum fu¨r Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Erbprinzenstr. 13, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany Edited by Bert Ho¨lldobler, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, and approved August 4, 2008 (received for review June 27, 2008) Ants are the world’s most conspicuous and important eusocial insects and their diversity, abundance, and extreme behavioral specializations make them a model system for several disciplines within the biological sciences. Here, we report the discovery of a new ant that appears to represent the sister lineage to all extant ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). The phylogenetic position of this cryptic predator from the soils of the Amazon rainforest was inferred from several nuclear genes, sequenced from a single leg. Martialis heureka (gen. et sp. nov.) also constitutes the sole representative of a new, morphologically distinct subfamily of ants, the Martialinae (subfam. nov.). Our analyses have reduced the likelihood of long-branch attraction artifacts that have trou- bled previous phylogenetic studies of early-diverging ants and therefore solidify the emerging view that the most basal extant ant lineages are cryptic, hypogaeic foragers. On the basis of morpho- logical and phylogenetic evidence we suggest that these special- EVOLUTION ized subterranean predators are the sole surviving representatives of a highly divergent lineage that arose near the dawn of ant diversification and have persisted in ecologically stable environ- ments like tropical soils over great spans of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant‐Termite Interactions
    Biol. Rev. (2020), 95, pp. 555–572. 555 doi: 10.1111/brv.12577 Ant-termite interactions: an important but under-explored ecological linkage Jiri Tuma1,2,3* , Paul Eggleton4 and Tom M. Fayle1,5 1Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic 2Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Biology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic 3Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic 4Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, London, UK 5Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia ABSTRACT Animal interactions play an important role in understanding ecological processes. The nature and intensity of these inter- actions can shape the impacts of organisms on their environment. Because ants and termites, with their high biomass and range of ecological functions, have considerable effects on their environment, the interaction between them is important for ecosystem processes. Although the manner in which ants and termites interact is becoming increasingly well studied, there has been no synthesis to date of the available literature. Here we review and synthesise all existing literature on ant– termite interactions. We infer that ant predation on termites is the most important, most widespread, and most studied type of interaction. Predatory ant species can regulate termite populations and subsequently slow down the decomposi- tion of wood, litter and soil organic matter. As a consequence they also affect plant growth and distribution, nutrient cycling and nutrient availability. Although some ant species are specialised termite predators, there is probably a high level of opportunistic predation by generalist ant species, and hence their impact on ecosystem processes that termites are known to provide varies at the species level.
    [Show full text]
  • PHRYNOPONERA Armata. Pachycondyla (Bothroponera) Armata Santschi, 1919H: 82 (W.) DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of CONGO
    PHRYNOPONERA armata. Pachycondyla (Bothroponera) armata Santschi, 1919h: 82 (w.) DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. Type-material: holotype worker. Type-locality: Democratic Republic of Congo (“Congo belge”): Kitempuka (Gérard). Type-depository: NHMB. Combination in Phrynoponera: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 773. Status as species: Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 773; Bolton, 1995b: 334. Junior synonym of gabonensis: Bolton & Fisher, 2008b: 43. bequaerti. Phrynoponera bequaerti Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 79, fig. 12 (q.) DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. Type-material: holotype queen. Type-locality: Democratic Republic of Congo (“Belgian Congo”): Ngayu (= N’Gayu), stomach Bufo superciliaris (H.O. Lang). Type-depository: AMNH. Bolton & Fisher, 2008b: 41 (w.). Status as species: Bolton, 1995b: 334; Bolton & Fisher, 2008b: 41 (redescription). Distribution: Cameroon, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Ghana. esta. Phrynoponera gabonensis var. esta Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 77 (w.q.) DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. Type-material: 8 syntype workers, 1syntype queen. Type-locality: Democratic Republic of Congo (“Belgian Congo”): Medje, stomach Bufo superciliaris, polycercus, funereus, tuberosus (Lang & Chapin). [On at least one syntype: Medje, 27°15’E, 2°25’N, stomach Bufo tuberosus.] Type-depositories: AMNH, LACM, MCZC. Junior synonym of gabonensis: Brown, 1950e: 246; Bolton, 1995b: 334; Bolton & Fisher, 2008b: 43. fecunda. Phyrnoponera gabonensis var. fecunda Wheeler, W.M. 1922a: 78 (w.q.) DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO. Type-material:11 syntype workers, 1 syntype queen. Type-locality: Democratic Republic of Congo (“Belgian Congo”): Akenge, stomach Bufo superciliaris, polycercus, funereus, tuberosus (Lang & Chapin). [On some syntypes: Akenge, 26°50’E, 2°55’N, stomach Bufo polycercus/Bufo funereus (H.O. Lang).] Type-depositories: AMNH, LACM, MCZC.
    [Show full text]
  • Digging Deeper Into the Ecology of Subterranean Ants: Diversity and Niche Partitioning Across Two Continents
    diversity Article Digging Deeper into the Ecology of Subterranean Ants: Diversity and Niche Partitioning across Two Continents Mickal Houadria * and Florian Menzel Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Soil fauna is generally understudied compared to above-ground arthropods, and ants are no exception. Here, we compared a primary and a secondary forest each on two continents using four different sampling methods. Winkler sampling, pitfalls, and four types of above- and below-ground baits (dead, crushed insects; melezitose; living termites; living mealworms/grasshoppers) were applied on four plots (4 × 4 grid points) on each site. Although less diverse than Winkler samples and pitfalls, subterranean baits provided a remarkable ant community. Our baiting system provided a large dataset to systematically quantify strata and dietary specialisation in tropical rainforest ants. Compared to above-ground baits, 10–28% of the species at subterranean baits were overall more common (or unique to) below ground, indicating a fauna that was truly specialised to this stratum. Species turnover was particularly high in the primary forests, both concerning above-ground and subterranean baits and between grid points within a site. This suggests that secondary forests are more impoverished, especially concerning their subterranean fauna. Although subterranean ants rarely displayed specific preferences for a bait type, they were in general more specialised than above-ground ants; this was true for entire communities, but also for the same species if they foraged in both strata. Citation: Houadria, M.; Menzel, F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Ant Aenictus Silvestrii and Its Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description of a New Species
    Entomological Science (2010) 13, 328–333 doi:10.1111/j.1479-8298.2010.00385.x ORIGINAL ARTICLE The army ant Aenictus silvestrii and its related species in Southeast Asia, with a description of a new species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae)ens_385 328..333 Weeyawat JAITRONG1,2 and Seiki YAMANE1 1Department of Natural Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan; and 2Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand Abstract Three species of Aenictus with reduced numbers of antennal segments (8–9) occur in Southeast Asia: A. jarujini sp. nov., A. latifemoratus and A. silvestrii. Aenictus latifemoratus is new to Java and Borneo, while A. silvestrii is recorded for the first time from Borneo. Key words: Aenictus jarujini sp. nov., army ants, southeast Asia, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION & Yamane (1989) (Sumatra, Indonesia); Terayama & Kubota (1993) (Vietnam and Thailand); Yamane The genus Aenictus Shuckard, 1840 (subfamily Aenicti- & Hashimoto (1999) (Sarawak, Borneo); Shattuck nae) is one of the large ant genera in the world. Currently (2008) (Australia). Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata (2005) 149 valid species and subspecies are listed (Bolton et al. listed the known species of Thailand. 2006). They are mainly distributed in the Old World During our survey on the Asian species of Aenictus, tropics and subtropics, from Africa through the Middle we have recognized a well-defined species group of three East, India, South China, southernmost part of Japan, Southeast Asian species comprising the two species various countries in Southeast Asia to New Guinea and above mentioned and a new species from Thailand. In Australia (Gotwald 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Models of Ant Diversity Suggest Regions Where New Discoveries Are Most Likely Are Under Disproportionate Deforestation Threat
    Global models of ant diversity suggest regions where new discoveries are most likely are under disproportionate deforestation threat Benoit Guénard1, Michael D. Weiser, and Robert R. Dunn Department of Biology and the Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 Edited* by Edward O. Wilson, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved March 23, 2012 (received for review August 24, 2011) Most of the described and probably undescribed species on Earth As for other taxa, richness decreased with latitude (e.g., refs. 13 are insects. Global models of species diversity rarely focus on and 14) (Fig. 1) and there were also strong regional effects on the insects and none attempt to address unknown, undescribed magnitude of diversity. African regions were less diverse than diversity. We assembled a database representing about 13,000 would be expected given their latitude (or climate), the reverse of records for ant generic distribution from over 350 regions that the pattern observed for termites (15, 16) and terrestrial mammals cover much of the globe. Based on two models of diversity and (17), although similar to that for vascular plants (5, 18). The 53 endemicity, we identified regions where our knowledge of ant endemic genera were found almost exclusively in tropical regions diversity is most limited, regions we have called “hotspots of dis- that were diverse more generally, with four interesting exceptions covery.” A priori, such regions might be expected to be remote in North Africa, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and South Korea (Fig. 2). and untouched. Instead, we found that the hotspots of discovery Both overall generic diversity and endemic diversity showed are also the regions in which biodiversity is the most threatened a peak in the Oriental region, especially in Borneo, and were also by habitat destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Ant Aenictus Hottai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) and Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description Of
    557 The Army AntAenictus hottai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) and Related Species in Southeast Asia, with a Description of a New Species by Decha Wiwatwitaya1 & Weeyawat Jaitrong2, 3 ABSTRACT The Aenictus hottai group is established to include two species (a named and a new species) occurring in Southeast Asia: Aenictus hottai Terayama et Yamane, 1989 and Aenictus yamanei Wiwatwitaya et Jaitrong, sp. nov. Both are probably restricted to Sundaland and inhabit lowland primary forests. Key words: Taxonomy, Formicidae, Aenictinae, Aenictus yamanei, army ants, new species. INTRODUCTION Currently 95 species are listed in the army ant genus Aenictus from the Oriental, Indo-Australian, and Australasian regions (Jaitrong & Eguchi 2010; Bolton 2011). Among them 67 species are known only from the worker caste. All of those species except one have a smooth and shining gaster. The species with a finely reticulated gaster, Aenictus hottai Terayama et Yamane, 1989, is also characterized by a well-developed subpetiolar process with a poster- oventrally produced arm, and is found only in Southeast Asia (Terayama & Yamane 1989; Rościszewski & Mashchwitz 1994; Malsch et al. 2003; Jaitrong & Nabhitabhata 2005). In the course of our examination of Aenictus specimens collected from Southeast Asia, we found another species from Malay Peninsula and Sarawak that is closely related to A. hottai but is much smaller than the latter. In this paper we describe this ant as a new species based on the worker caste and both species are classified into the Aenictus hottai group herein established. 1 Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand, E-mail: [email protected] 2 Thailand Natural History Museum, National Science Museum, Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand, E-mail: [email protected] 3 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 8900065, Japan 558 Sociobiology Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Species of the Army Ant Genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) from Borneo and the Philippines
    Z.Arb.Gem.Öst.Ent. 62 115-125 Wien, 19. 11. 2010 ISSN 0375-5223 Three new species of the army ant genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Aenictinae) from Borneo and the Philippines Herbert ZETTEL & Daniela Magdalena SORGER Abstract Descriptions of three new species of army ants are provided: Aenictus pfeifferi sp.n. from Sarawak, Borneo; Aenictus pangantihoni sp.n. from Camiguin, the Philippines; and Aenictus carolianus sp.n. from Cebu, the Philippines. Key words: Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Aenictus, army ants, new species, taxonomy, Philippines, Malaysia, Borneo, Cebu, Camiguin. Zusammenfassung Diese Arbeit liefert die Beschreibungen von drei Ameisenarten aus der Unterfamilie der Aenictinae (Treiberameisen): Aenictus pfeifferi sp.n. wird aus Sarawak, Borneo, beschrie- ben, Aenictus pangantihoni sp.n. von der Insel Camiguin, Philippinen, und Aenictus caro- lianus sp.n. von der Insel Cebu, Philippinen. Introduction The islands in the western Pacific region still yield a wealth of undescribed ant species. Despite the interesting biology of army ants – a review was published by KRONAUER (2009) – their taxonomy and zoogeography are poorly studied and need much more atten- tion. To our knowledge, the “true” army ants of the genus Aenictus SHUCKARD, 1840 (sub- family Aenictinae) are remarkably specious in the region. The described species are often recorded from a single island; this might be either an effect of reduced dispersal abilities or just a lack of information. Since WILSON’s (1964) taxonomic revision only a few species have been described from Southeast Asia, including one from Borneo (YAMANE & HASHIMOTO 1999), but none from the Philippines. In our present study we describe three species.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Type Specimens Deposited in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) and a Preliminary Checklist
    Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 121 9–18 Wien, Februar 2019 Notes on the ant fauna of Eritrea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae): type specimens deposited in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) and a preliminary checklist M. Madl* Abstract The ant collection of the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) contains syntypes of nine species described from Eritrea: Aphaenogaster clavata EMERY, 1877 (= Pheidole clavata (EMERY, 1877)), Cam- ponotus carbo EMERY, 1877, Melissotarsus beccarii EMERY, 1877, Monomorium bicolor EMERY, 1877, Pheidole rugaticeps EMERY, 1877, Pheidole speculifera EMERY, 1877, Polyrhachis antinorii EMERY, 1877 (= Polyrhachis viscosa SMITH, 1858) and Tetramorium doriae EMERY, 1881. All syntypes were collected in Eritrea except the syntype of Monomorium luteum EMERY, 1881, which was collected in Yemen. A prelimi- nary checklist of the ants of Eritrea comprises 114 species and subspecies of seven subfamilies. Zusammenfassung In der Ameisensammlung des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien (Österreich) werden Syntypen von neun Arten aufbewahrt, die aus Eritrea beschrieben worden sind: Aphaenogaster clavata EMERY, 1877 [= Phei- dole clavata (EMERY, 1877)], Camponotus carbo EMERY, 1877, Melissotarsus beccarii EMERY, 1877, Mono- morium bicolor EMERY, 1877, Pheidole rugaticeps EMERY, 1877, Pheidole speculifera EMERY, 1877, Poly- rhachis antinorii EMERY, 1877 (= Polyrhachis viscosa SMITH, 1858) und Tetramorium doriae EMERY, 1881. Alle Syntypen stammen aus Eritrea ausgenommen der Syntypus von Monomorium luteum EMERY, 1881, der in Jemen gesammelt wurde. Eine vorläufige Artenliste der Ameisen Eritreas umfasst 114 Arten und Unterarten aus sieben Unterfamilien. Key words: Formicidae, types, Camponotus, Melissotarsus, Monomorium, Pheidole, Polyrhachis, Tetra- morium, checklist, Eritrea, Yemen. Introduction The study of the ant fauna of Eritrea has been neglected for several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Classification of Ants (Formicidae)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/407452; this version posted September 4, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Taxonomic Classification of Ants (Formicidae) from Images using Deep Learning Marijn J. A. Boer1 and Rutger A. Vos1;∗ 1 Endless Forms, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, 2333 BA, Netherlands *[email protected] Abstract 1 The well-documented, species-rich, and diverse group of ants (Formicidae) are important 2 ecological bioindicators for species richness, ecosystem health, and biodiversity, but ant 3 species identification is complex and requires specific knowledge. In the past few years, 4 insect identification from images has seen increasing interest and success, with processing 5 speed improving and costs lowering. Here we propose deep learning (in the form of a 6 convolutional neural network (CNN)) to classify ants at species level using AntWeb 7 images. We used an Inception-ResNet-V2-based CNN to classify ant images, and three 8 shot types with 10,204 images for 97 species, in addition to a multi-view approach, for 9 training and testing the CNN while also testing a worker-only set and an AntWeb 10 protocol-deviant test set. Top 1 accuracy reached 62% - 81%, top 3 accuracy 80% - 92%, 11 and genus accuracy 79% - 95% on species classification for different shot type approaches. 12 The head shot type outperformed other shot type approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Poneromorfas Do Brasil Miolo.Indd
    10 - Citogenética e evolução do cariótipo em formigas poneromorfas Cléa S. F. Mariano Igor S. Santos Janisete Gomes da Silva Marco Antonio Costa Silvia das Graças Pompolo SciELO Books / SciELO Livros / SciELO Libros MARIANO, CSF., et al. Citogenética e evolução do cariótipo em formigas poneromorfas. In: DELABIE, JHC., et al., orgs. As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil [online]. Ilhéus, BA: Editus, 2015, pp. 103-125. ISBN 978-85-7455-441-9. Available from SciELO Books <http://books.scielo.org>. All the contents of this work, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Todo o conteúdo deste trabalho, exceto quando houver ressalva, é publicado sob a licença Creative Commons Atribição 4.0. Todo el contenido de esta obra, excepto donde se indique lo contrario, está bajo licencia de la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimento 4.0. 10 Citogenética e evolução do cariótipo em formigas poneromorfas Cléa S.F. Mariano, Igor S. Santos, Janisete Gomes da Silva, Marco Antonio Costa, Silvia das Graças Pompolo Resumo A expansão dos estudos citogenéticos a cromossomos de todas as subfamílias e aquela partir do século XIX permitiu que informações que apresenta mais informações a respeito de ca- acerca do número e composição dos cromosso- riótipos é também a mais diversa em número de mos fossem aplicadas em estudos evolutivos, ta- espécies: Ponerinae Lepeletier de Saint Fargeau, xonômicos e na medicina humana. Em insetos, 1835. Apenas nessa subfamília observamos carió- são conhecidos os cariótipos em diversas ordens tipos com número cromossômico variando entre onde diversos padrões cariotípicos podem ser ob- 2n=8 a 120, gêneros com cariótipos estáveis, pa- servados.
    [Show full text]