South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Response to North Devon & Torridge District Council Core Strategy DPD’s Issues & Options Document

South Molton – SMO H1, H2, H4 & H5

December 2007

CAEN

HOMES

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Contents

Introduction

Section 1. Location 1.1 Site Locations 1.2 Site Analysis

Section 2. Background Issues 2.1 Planning 2.2 Other issues

Section 3. Assessment 3.1 Summary Landscape Assessment 3.2 Summary Ecological Assessment 3.4 Summary Highways and Drainage Appraisal 3.5 Summary Sustainability Appraisal

Section 4. Development Options 4.1 Development Concepts 4.2 Access / Highways 4.3 Deliverability

Appendix 1 – DWP Landscape Assessment – Full Report

Appendix 2 - Ambios Ecological assessment – Full report

Appendix 3 - PBA Highways appraisal – Full report

Appendix 4 - TJ Sustainability appraisal – Full report

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response i Introduction i.i This report has been prepared as a response to North Devon District Council & Torridge District Council’s joint core strategy issues and options DPD. i.ii It has been prepared on behalf of Midas Homes Ltd and Caen Homes Ltd. i.iii Contributions to its content are from;

- David Wilson Partnership – Architects & Landscape Architects - Midas Homes Ltd – Developer - Caen Homes Ltd – Developer - Ambios Ecology – Ecological Consultants - Peter Brett Associates – Highways, Drainage, Flood risk - Tom Jones – Sustainability Consultant i.iv The main body of the report contains the summary information all background and full report information is contained within the appendices. i.v All maps are reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of The Controller of Her majesty’s Stationer Office. Crown copyright. All rights reserved. ,Licence Number 100041893.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Section 1 1.1 Site Location

1.1.0 Context

1.1.1 4 potential sites identified within the draft core strategy document are considered within this report they are;

SMO H1 – Land south of Deerhill Lane SMO H2 – Land between Nadder Lane and Gunswell Lane SMO H4 – Land west of Exeter Gate and George Nympton SMO H5 – Land South of Alswear New Road

1.1.2 It is the intention that these four portions of land will be developed within three distinct phases;

Phase 1a – SMO H1 Phase 1b – SMO H2

Phase 2 – SMO H5

Phase 3 – SMO H4

1.1.3 The Plan opposite shows the relevant sites in relation to South Molton and the site areas which have been considered as part of this report.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

1.2 Physical Site Analysis – SMO H1 & H2 1.2.1 Summary of Analysis Cons Land elevated on the ridgeline* Pros South facing elevation with potential for solar gain * * denotes item raised within joint cores strategy document Well related to existing employment land (Pathfields) with potential to reduce the need to travel* Potential to provide new gateway into South Molton 1.2.2 – The site area under consideration and denoted by the red line is 13.8 Hectares Potential to provide pedestrian and cycle links from recent residential development to Pathfields Potential to enhance access to the existing school site

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

1.3 Physical Site Analysis – SMO H5 1.3.1 Summary of Analysis Cons Adjoins key features in biodiversity network* Pros Contains some grade 2 & grade 3 agricultural land Close to college and town centre * Existing pedestrian links through site can be incorporated to improve access to open countryside * denotes item raised within joint cores strategy document Potential to link with and improve facilitates at the college Potential to develop community facilities as part of the proposal which link with college and main town 1.3.2 – The site area under consideration and denoted by the red line is 15.4 Hectares

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

1.4 Physical Site Analysis – SMO H4 Cons Adjoins key features in biodiversity network* 1.4.1 Summary of Analysis Contains grade 2 agricultural land Pros Parts of site extend beyond visual boundary of South Molton Well related to existing settlement form * Steep slopes on parts of site Close to college * denotes item raised within joint cores strategy document

1.4.2 – The site area under consideration and denoted by the red line is 9.0 Hectares

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Section 2 - Relevant Background Issues the town for the period up to 2026. They are capable of being phased and in respect of SMOH1, H2 and H5 in particular they all provide other additional benefits to the town other than 2.1 Planning the mere provision of housing.

Outside of Barnstaple South Molton has been the focal point for growth and regeneration in 2.2 Other issues North Devon lying as it does at the centre of the Priority Area for Rural Regeneration. It falls It is proposed that the sites contained in this document represent a solution to the housing naturally into RSS Policy B which requires that the scale of development at market towns delivery challenge. should be dependent on their function. As well as providing for much needed new housing the sites have a significant range of The North Devon Local Plan identified South Molton as the major Area Centre in the Plan community benefits. recognising that it has substantial potential along with locational advantages to meet the employment and housing needs of a wide hinterland of this part of North Devon. In conjunction Site H1 & H2 will allow for the existing school facilities to be extended/relocated, while also with others we have undertaken a visual assessment of the many potential sites around the providing much improved access arrangements, and a new road link which will ease the town and close to Pathfields Business Park. In our view the employment sites identified as pressure on the existing town centre. SMOE1 and SMOE2 are the preferable extensions to the Business Park at this point in time, however the longer term potential of E3 cannot be ignored. Site H4 can provide for much improved access arrangements to the existing secondary school, potential for a new rugby pitch, and new informal public space (with excellent view across In respect of housing we believe the sites on the east side of the town identified as SMOH6, H7 South Molton). & H8 are all limited in scale and visually intrusive, furthermore they have limited potential to deliver other wider benefits to the town. In respect of SMOH3 this area is immediately adjacent Site H5 will provide a logical ‘edge’ to the South Molton settlement. to a part of the town which is already the most prominent westward extension to the town and we would suggest that sequentially this area is less preferable than the other areas identified It is proposed that the delivery of these sites should be phased, subject to the housing need below. and delivery requirements. By working in this way the growth of South Molton can take place in a controlled manner, ensuring the strong character of South Molton is maintained, while Our assessment has identified sites at SMOH1, H2, H4 and H5 to be the most suitable for delivering real community benefits. residential development in the town. These sites taken together provide long term potential for

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Section 3 Constraints 3.1 Summary Landscape Assessment (see Appendix 1 for full report) The existing mature hedgerows on site provide a valuable habitat resource and a strong landscape structure. These hedgerows ought to be protected, within a wildlife corridor, in any development on the

site. Site H1 The existing developed skyline presents a constraint on the height of any development. 3.1.1. Opportunities The site provides drainage for upslope gardens, this drainage would need to be maintained. There is an opportunity to form a northern gateway to South Molton at the proposed North Road Recommendations entrance to the site, including a safer pedestrian crossing to the recreation ground. •Development to sit below the existing developed skyline. There is an opportunity to develop to the south of the hilltop and ridgeline without negative landscape •Provide continuity of drainage through the site. impacts on surrounding countryside or on views into the town from the surrounding area. Such •Retain and renovate existing hedgerows within the site development could include space for the school to expand, to incorporate the infants and junior schools onto one site. Any such development presents an opportunity to remove through traffic from Gunswell Site H5 Lane, making it a much safer approach to the school. Opportunities It is believed that there is also scope for some development to the east of the site, so long as it is not so It is believed that development to the northern and eastern downslope edges of the site would not have intensive as to have a negative impact on the green corridor when viewed from the AGLV and can be a negative impact on the views over the site from the south and east. adequately screened from the north east by existing off site woodland. There are opportunities within the site to improve public access to the hilltop viewpoint through the There is an opportunity for any development to provide a road link between the B3227 and B3226, thus provision of an additional area of publicly accessible open space, to replace the sheepfair field. relieving traffic pressure on the town centre from heavy vehicles travelling between the west of the town Constraints and Pathfields Industrial area. Any development to the south of the high point on site would have the effect of breaching the existing Constraints visual boundary of the developed area of South Molton and as such would have a negative visual Any development above the ridgeline or on the north side of the ridge would be highly visible from the impact. Exmoor fringes and would have a negative impact on the landscape. The existing mature hedgerow along the school boundary has to be retained to continue to provide a The existing mature hedgerows on site provide a valuable habitat resource and a strong landscape visual screen to the school. structure. These hedgerows ought to be protected, within a wildlife corridor, in any development on the Recommendations site. •Concentrate built development to the north of the site and below the skyline to the east. Frog Lane, while not in the area under consideration is an historic landscape feature that would be •Provide new public open space to the prominent hilltop and ridgeline, connected to the centre of South affected by any development. An assessment of it’s archaeological importance and recommendations Molton by foot/cyclepath. for mitigating measures ought to be carried out prior to any development on the site.

Recommendations Site H4 • Limit any development to the south of the ridgeline and hilltop, reinforce existing hedgerow and Opportunities provide new planting to reinforce the ridgeline boundary. It is believed that development of this site, if supported by a robust landscape treatment, could have a • Develop a gateway feature at the North Road entrance to the site. beneficial impact by clearly defining the edge of the built up area of South Molton and providing a • Retain and renovate existing hedgerows within the site gateway to the town. • Promote opportunities to rationalise vehicle and pedestrian circulation around the school. Constraints

The existing developed skyline should be maintained. Site H2 Recommendations Opportunities •Development ought to sit below the existing developed skyline. Development to the south of the site to There is scope for development of the whole site without negative visual impact on South Molton or it’s be of a scale where it is effectively screened by the existing woodland around Furzebray. environs. The south facing aspect of the site provides potential for solar gain in any development. •Retain and renovate existing hedgerows within the site Provision of a new access to the site from Nadder Lane provides potential for a road to link the B3227 to the west and B3226 and Pathfields industrial area to the north, thus relieving traffic pressure on •Provide a landscape structure that creates a gateway to South Molton and clearly defines the South Molton town centre. edge of the town.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

3.2 Summary Ecological Assessment (see Appendix 2 for full report) The hedges are of low value for dormice and are not well connected to wider suitable habitat. Site H1 No EPS licence likely to be needed. The site principally comprises species-poor semi-improved pasture fields of low ecological No badger setts were found during survey. value intersected by currently unmanaged Devon hedge banks. The hedges are generally fairly No evidence of Japanese knotweed was found anywhere on the site. rich in woody species with half or more likely to qualify as important hedges under the ASSESSMENT : NO MAJOR ECOLOGICAL ISSUES ON THIS SITE BUT AS A MATTER OF hedgerow regulations (excepting that they are presently unmanaged however). BEST PRACTICE RECOMMEND BAT SURVEY DURING 2008 The majority of the hedge banks appear to possess a moderate potential (lower end of this) as a habitat for Dormice. Connectivity to other suitable habitats / suitable hedges is poor however Site H5 (the area of newly planted woodland with mature hedges that lies beyond the road to the east Arable fields, ungrazed semi-improved species-poor grassland and improved amenity of the site is not well connected). grassland. The majority of the hedges support a moderate range of woody species Further dormouse survey is recommended, however on the basis of existing survey information (approximately 5). Only one double hedgebank/green lane lying on the perimeter of the site is it appears that an EPS licence is unlikely to be required. likely to qualify as an important hedge under the hedgerow regulations. Otherwise potentially a A single probable disused sett with a single entrance hole lies on the south/eastern perimeter good choice of site with regard to impact on hedges given that there are very few within the site of the site in a boundary hedge bank. This is unlikely to have any significant impacts on boundary. development proposals. The hedges are generally closely cut or outgrown, unsuitable for dormice and poorly A field of rough grassland lies in the north east of the site and further rough grassland lies connected to suitable habitat in the wider area. No EPS licence likely to be needed. adjacent to farm buildings in the central portion of the site. There appears to be a fairly low No badger setts were recorded on the site during survey. likelihood of slowworm populations occurring in these areas (dense continuous sward). It may No evidence of Japanese knotweed was found anywhere on the site. be worth checking with mats at an early stage prior to any clearance however? ASSESSMENT : NO MAJOR ECOLOGICAL ISSUES ON THIS SITE BUT AS A MATTER OF A field of species-poor to locally moderately species-rich semi-improved rush pasture lies at the BEST PRACTICE RECOMMEND BAT SURVEY DURING 2008 western extreme of the site (field projecting out from the remainder of the site). This is almost certainly not of county importance but is likely to be of some local value to wildlife and of Site H4 potential plant species interest. Suitable mitigation or possibly avoidance of this field guided by Arable species-poor semi-improved grassland and improved grassland fields intersected by further botanical survey during summer (and possibly a data search) appear to be Devon hedge banks. The majority of hedges across the site are likely to qualify as important appropriate. under the hedgerow regulations. No evidence of Japanese knotweed was found anywhere on the site. The hedges are generally closely cut or outgrown, unsuitable for dormice and poorly connected ASSESSMENT : NO MAJOR ECOLOGICAL ISSUES ON THIS SITE BUT AS A MATTER OF to suitable dormouse habitat in the wider area. No EPS licence likely to be needed. BEST PRACTICE RECOMMEND BAT SURVEY DURING 2008 No badger setts were recorded on the site during survey. No evidence of Japanese knotweed was found anywhere on the site. Site H2 ASSESSMENT : NO MAJOR ECOLOGICAL ISSUES ON THIS SITE BUT AS A MATTER OF Improved pasture of low ecological value intersected by well-managed hedge banks. The BEST PRACTICE RECOMMEND BAT SURVEY DURING 2008 hedges are moderately rich in woody species with at least one being rich and likely to qualify as an important hedge under the hedgerow regulations.

3.3 Summary Highways/drainage Assessment Drainage Assessment gravity sewers and pumping station with rising main are proposed to provide a suitable on site Sites H1 and H2 foul drainage scheme. Foul Sewers Surface Water There are existing public foul sewers in the location of the site that can be used for foul There are no surface water sewers in the area. The existing ground is largely rock / discharge. Further investigations are required to assess their capacity and that of the mudstones, suggesting that conditions may be suitable for soakaways. The nearest point of downstream pumping station. Subject to the results of these investigations, a combination of discharge is to the watercourse located some 350m west of the site. Subject to further detailed

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response site investigations, it is proposed that surface water is dealt with via a SUDS system and the results of these investigations, a combination of gravity sewers and pumping station with soakaways within the confines of the site under consideration. rising main are proposed to provide a suitable on site foul drainage scheme. Surface Water Site H5 There are no surface water sewers in the area. The existing ground is largely rock / Foul Sewers mudstones, suggesting that conditions may be suitable for soakaways. The nearest point of There are existing public foul sewers in the location of the site that can be used for foul discharge is to the watercourse located some 50m east of the site across the B3137 road. discharge. Further investigations are required to assess their capacity and that of the Subject to further detailed site investigations, it is proposed that surface water is dealt with via downstream pumping station. Subject to the results of these investigations, a combination of a SUDS system and soakaways within the confines of the site under consideration. gravity sewers and pumping station with rising main are proposed to provide a suitable on site foul drainage scheme. Highways Assessment (see Appendix 3 for full report) The proposed development sites at South Molton provide strategic opportunity for residential Surface Water growth without compromising the overall street hierarchy and balance of the town. There are no surface water sewers in the area. The existing ground is largely rock / Furthermore the sites can bring about strategic highway improvements in terms of the way that mudstones, suggesting that conditions may be suitable for soakaways. The nearest point of the road networks that t hey provide can be integrated into the rest of the street network. discharge is to the watercourse located some 200m west of the site. Subject to further detailed Additionally the sites offer improvements to the town in terms of local facilities pedestrian site investigations, it is proposed that surface water is dealt with via a SUDS system and routes and amenity all of which will serve to improve the self containment of the settlement. At soakaways within the confines of the site under consideration. this stage there has been no formal consultation with the local highway authority or assessment of the existing network. However, it is considered that the network will have more Site H4 than enough capacity to accommodate the development without affecting highway safety or Foul Sewers operation. This review (see appendix 3) has shown that the South Molton sites are all suitable There are existing public foul sewers in the location of the site that can be used for foul locations for residential development, due to their close proximity to the town centre and other discharge. South West Water have reported an existing flooding problems in Williamson Way essential facilities, and because of their excellent accessibility within the local highways and South Street. Further investigations are required to assess the capacity of local foul network. drainage system and that of the downstream pumping station, as well as options for mitigating the impact of any new development on the Souh Street / Williamson Way system. Subject to

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

3.5 Summary Sustainability Appraisal (see Appendix 4 for sustainability matrices) Project Level Sustainability Key Strategic Sustainability The developers estimate that 763 units could be delivered at an average density of 35 - 40 On the basis of our appraisal using the joint NDDC/TDC SA Framework and given the context houses per hectare and that an appropriate level of affordable housing could be achieved. It is of the site options for South Molton we propose a phased development of SMO H1, H2, H4 and considered that the site offers good access to employment, service and leisure opportunities by H5 avoiding development above the ridge line. Whilst it is recognised that development of H4 walking, cycling or public transport and without putting critical pressure on the existing highway and H5 would result in the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, it is considered that network. such an approach could maximise the benefits in terms of accessibility, biodiversity and sustainable construction. By comparison, the sites on the east side of the town identified as It is considered that benefits could be delivered to accessibility, open space, biodiversity and SMOH6, H7 & H8 are visually intrusive and limited in scale. sustainable construction through a phased and co-ordinated development.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Section 4 4.1.1 Development Options Phase 1a & 1b – SMO H1 & H2 Summary of Proposal Site H1 Area considered suitable for development: 5.26 Ha (from a total of 13.9 Ha considered) = 210 residential units, @ 40 per Hectare All development to south of prominent ridgeline New gateway feature for South Molton on North Road Potential for new access road to connect west and north of town, bypassing the town centre Proposal allows potential for expansion of existing school site and enhanced facilities and access to school.

Site H2 Area considered suitable for development: 3.77 Ha (out of 3.77 Ha considered) = 151 residential units @ 40 per Hectare. Development line below existing skyline Potential for new access road to connect west and north of town, bypassing the town centre Existing hedgerow pattern retained and reinforced.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Section 4 4.1.2 Development Options Development proposed to north of the prominent hilltop and ridgeline. Phase 2 – SMO H5 New area of public access land Summary of Proposal Potential for improved access and parking for community college and hub for community Developable area, 4.4 Ha (from a total of 15.4 Ha considered) = 156 residential units, @ 35 facilities per Hectare

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Section 4 4.1.3 Development Options Development below the existing skyline development Phase 3 – SMO H4 New gateway into South Molton Developable area, 6.16 Ha (from a total of 9 Ha considered) = 246 residential units, @ 40 per Landscaped buffer zone for households abutting the site Hectare

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Section 4 4.2 Access/ Highways Development at South Molton is proposed in three stages. The access strategy for each stage For phase 3, the main access point for the site would be at the South Street – Parklands will be detailed below. junction at the centre north of the site, running southwards through the centre of the development and joining to the lane at the south of the site. The north access point would be For phase 1, the plan is to build from the recently constructed Midas site off Nadder Lane. the most heavily used, as this point would provide the most direct route to the majority of Gunswell lane will then be a cul-de-sac, providing access to the school only, the site will then destinations from the site. effectively be an extended cul-de-sac off Nadder Lane. It is also proposed to connect the development to North Road via a new roundabout junction at the northern gateway to the town. The residential development is likely to increase traffic volume on South Street and George This will then effectively provide a link between North Road and Nadder Lane, which will relieve Nympton road, although not significantly so. The lane off George Nympton road may both of these routes and the centre of the town. Sites 1a and 1b will then connect and access occasionally be used for agricultural vehicles, but this is not expected to be a significant Gunswell Lane, meaning that Gunswell Lane provides a pedestrian/cycle route into town, with problem, as this is only a secondary access to the site. The development is expected to have vehicular routes to the north and south. minimum impact on traffic volume for the town, and congestion is unlikely to pose a problem.

The greatest potential for congestion as a result of the site is likely to be at the northern access 4.3 Deliverability point, but this will be reduced by ensuring good visibility at the junction, and through the use of Midas and Caen Homes have joined forces to produce what is considered to be a solution to the other access points. Preliminary investigations indicate that all junctions and proposed meet the residential growth requirements of South Molton. access points are achievable. This has been achieved by identifying four key sites which are all deliverable without significant Although the proposed development at phase one will generate additional traffic, the access negative impacts and with significant community benefits. strategy is such that it would create a new route for north to west, and west to north traffic, and for the new development south of Nadder Lane, therefore reducing the traffic volume in the The sites are proposed to form a phased approach in agreement with the LPA to ensure that the town centre. It will also greatly improve access to the school. growth of South Molton takes place with an overall deliverable vision.

For phase 2, it is proposed to provide a new road from Alswear New Road, with a new priority The sites are all well related to the town centre and designed to have minimal visual impact by junction. The route runs in an easterly direction, and will connect to a new interchange point at keeping below existing important ridge lines. the edge of the site, providing a new service area for the school, and potential sport facilities. Access to the site will also be possible from Alswear Old Road, which will be for pedestrians It is proposed that site H1 is developed first, followed by H2, H4 and H5. The exact timing of and cyclists. this will be dependant on the requirements of the RSS, identified need and be agreed with the LPA. They will contain an appropriate level of affordable housing to met local need and follow The residential development will increase traffic volume for the town, but not significantly so. the principles of sustainable development. The areas with the highest potential to be affected by the development are around the college, on Kingsway and on Alswear New Road. The access strategy though, is expected to improve In this way the proposed sites represent an excellent solution for South Molton. accessibility to the college from the Alswear New Road direction.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Appendix 1 Any development above the ridgeline or on the north side of the ridge would be highly visible from the Exmoor fringes and would have a negative impact on the landscape. Landscape Assessment – Undertaken by David Wilson Partnership The existing mature hedgerows on site provide a valuable habitat resource and a strong landscape structure. These hedgerows ought to be protected, within a wildlife corridor, in any development on the site. Site SMO H1 Frog Lane, while not in the area under consideration is an historic landscape feature that would be affected by any Land South of Deerhill Lane development. An assessment of it’s archaeological importance and recommendations for mitigating measures Description ought to be carried out prior to any development on the site. Site H1 lies to the north of Deerhill Lane, between Gunnswell Lane to the west and the B3226, North Rd, to the Recommendations east. The total site area is around 13Ha. At it’s southern edge, the site connects to site H2 across Gunnswell • Limit any development to the south of the ridgeline and hilltop, reinforce existing hedgerow and provide Lane. Both sites have been treated together in the accompanying maps. new planting to reinforce the ridgeline boundary. Landscape Character • Develop a gateway feature at the North Road entrance to the site. The Devon Landscape Assesment (1994) describes the character of the area around South Molton as High Culm • Retain and renovate existing hedgerows within the site Measures. Devon County Council’s historic landscape characterisation map defines the site as mediaeval • Promote opportunities to rationalise vehicle and pedestrian circulation around the school. enclosures based on strip fields, indicating that the existing hedgerows have historic significance. Landscape Designations Site SMO H2 The Exmoor fringe Area of Great landscape Value lies to the north of the site. The northern slopes of the site are Land Between Nadder lane and Gunswell Lane visible from within the AGLV (see photo viewpoint 3). Description Land Use, Landform and Vegetation The site is located between Gunnswell Lane to the North and Nadder Lane to the south. Site area approximately The site comprises 7 fields, currently used for grazing stock and horses, with public rights of way crossing from 6Ha. The site comprises 5 fields, rising from Nadder Lane to Gunnswell lane, which separates it from the southern north to south. There are small agricultural buildings on the southern edges of the site and a field stable near the part of site H1. North Road access. The site rises on all sides to a high point (164m) towards the east of the site, with a ridge line Landscape Character ruinnng westwards from this hilltop. Broad hedgebanks divide the fields within the site. Most are in good condition, The Devon Landscape Assesment (1994) describes the character of the area around South Molton as High Culm with mature trees and dense vegetation. There are a few places where lower vegetation has been grazed out, so Measures. Devon County Council’s historic landscape characterisation map defines the site as mediaeval only standard trees remain. enclosures based on strip fields, indicating that the existing hedgerows have historic significance. A noticeable off site feature is the tree lined lane running west to east at the northern edge of the site and the Landscape Designations South Molton Millennium wood to the north of the site, providing screening for the lower parts of the site when There are no landscape designations affecting the site. viewed from the north and west. Land Use, Landform and Vegetation To the north and east the the site bounds onto open countryside. To the south the boundary is formed by gardens, The site is currently used for grazing. South Molton infants school and Quince Honey Farm. A sunken lane (Frog Lane) with high, mature hedgebanks The site faces south east, sloping up from Nadder Lane to Gunnswell Lane. There is a drainage ditch running punctures the site at the southern edge. through the site from east to west, the ditch appears to provide drainage for the gardens to the east of the site. Visual Analysis The fields comprising the site are divided by mature hedgebanks, although there are few mature trees within the Visually, the dominat feature of the site is the hilltop and ridgeline, effectively cutting the site in half. The hill and hedges, as there are on site H1. It is likely that some of these hedgebanks are of historic significance, although no ridgeline screen the developed area of South Molton from the north devon link road (A361) and the small archaeological assessment has been carried out to date. A broad grass band runs north to south through the settlements to the north west of the town (see photograph viewpoint 1). When viewed from the AGLV (Viewpoints lower part of the site, bounded on both sides by mature hedgebanks. 2 and 3) the northern part of the site forms part of a green swathe that separates South Molton visually from the Pathfields industrial estate. It should be noted that Pathfields is far more visually intrusive on the AGLV than the town itself. The south of the ridge is visually contiguous with the developed areas of South Molton. Opportunities There is an opportunity to form a northern gateway to South Molton at the proposed North Road entrance to the site, including a safer pedestrian crossing to the recreation ground. There is an opportunity to develop to the south of the hilltop and ridgeline without negative landscape impacts on surrounding countryside or on views into the town from the surrounding area. Such development could include space for the school to expand, to incorporate the infants and junior schools onto one site Any such development presents an opportunity to remove through traffic from Gunswell Lane, making it a much safer approach to the school. It is believed that there is also scope for some development to the east of the site, so long as it is not so intensive as to have a negative impact on the green corridor when viewed from the AGLV and can be adequately screened from the north east by existing off site woodland. There is an opportunity for any development to provide a road link between the B3227 and B3226, thus relieving traffic pressure on the town centre from heavy vehicles travelling between the west of the town and Pathfields Industrial area. Constraints

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Visual Analysis See viewpoint 6 The site is bounded to the west (upslope side) and south by residential development, the upslope development punctures the South Molton skyline and would form a backdrop to any further development on the site. There is no obvious visual or physical edge to the town when viewed from the west, there is a broad area of agricultural land that forms a green link between high land to the north and south. It is believed that this site would fit into the developed boundary of the town without any negative visual impact.

Opportunities There is scope for development of the whole site without negative visual impact on South Molton or it’s environs. The south facing aspect of the site provides potential for solar gain in any development. Provision of a new access to the site from Nadder Lane provides potential for a road to link the B3227 to the west and B3226 and Pathfields industrial area to the north, thus relieving traffic pressure on South Molton town centre.

Constraints The existing mature hedgerows on site provide a valuable habitat resource and a strong landscape structure. These hedgerows ought to be protected, within a wildlife corridor, in any development on the site. The existing developed skyline presents a constraint on the height of any development. The site provides drainage for upslope gardens, this drainage would need to be maintained.

Recommendations • Development to sit below the existing developed skyline. • Provide continuity of drainage through the site. • Retain and renovate existing hedgerows within the site

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Landscape and Visual Analysis

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Site SMO H5 Land South of Alswear New Road Description The site comprising some 9Ha, between Alswear Old Road and Alswear New Road on the A proposal has been put forward in the community to relocate South Molton Rugby club to southern boundary of South Molton. To the west, the site wraps around the edge of South southern edge of the site, in a facility jointly managed with the Community College. In Molton Community College and it’s playing fields. A spur to the north connects, via a public landscape and visual terms, it is felt that this proposal would have a negative impact for the footpath, to Mill Street in the centre of the town, to the north is residential development and following reasons: South Molton cemetery. To the south and east lie open countryside • The earthworks required to provide level pitches would introduce an engineered and intrusive element into the landscape, beyond the visual boundary of the town; Landscape Character • Highly maintained sports turf would be uncharacteristic within a landscape made up of The Devon Landscape Assesment (1994) describes the character of the area around South extensively managed grassland and arable crops. Molton as High Culm Measures. Devon County Council’s historic landscape characterisation • The accompanying features of storage sheds, barrier rails, floodlights and hoardings map defines the site as modern enclosures. would have a detrimental impact on an open, extensive agricultural landscape.

Landscape Designations. Opportunities There are no landscape designations affecting the site. It is believed that development to the northern and eastern downslope edges of the site would not have a negative impact on the views over the site from the south and east. Land Use, Landform and Vegetation There are opportunities within the site to improve public access to the hilltop viewpoint through The whole site slopes gently towards a high point at it’s centre (150m contour), just below the provision of an additional area of publicly accessible open space, to replace the sheepfair which there is a derelict agricultural building. The site bounds the upper edge of a steeply field. sloping combe to the south. To the east and south of the high point, the site is appears to be arable crops. To the west, there is grassland, potentially used for grazing, adjacent to the Constraints Community College playing fields. The northern spur of the site is the old sheepfair field, Any development to the south of the high point on site would have the effect of breaching the currently used for informal public recreation. A sunken Lane, bounded by high hedges (Trigley existing visual boundary of the developed area of South Molton and as such would have a Lane) connects the sheepfair field to Alswear Old Road. With the exception of Trigley Lane, negative visual impact. there are no hedgerows or vegetation of note on the main body of the site, although mature The existing mature hedgerow along the school boundary has to be retained to continue to vegetation bounds the site where it runs adjacent to the Community College. provide a visual screen to the school. Much of the northern part of the site is used for informal recreation, although the presence of arable fields restricts use of the rest of the site. A public right of way runs from Mill Road, to the Recommendations College and on to Alswear Old Road. • Concentrate built development to the north of the site and below the skyline to the east. • Provide new public open space to the prominent hilltop and ridgeline, connected to the Visual Analysis centre of South Molton by foot/cyclepath. The site is mainly visible from the east and south (see viewpoints 10 and 11). From the east, the steeply sloping combe and high point form a visual boundary to the currently developed area of the town; any new development ought to recognise this boundary in it’s layout and design. Although the community college and existing development on Old Alswear Rd are visible from this aspect, they are screened by landform and mature vegetation. The strength of the visual development boundary to the east of the site weakens as the slope descends towards Alswear New Rd. It is believed that some development, supported by landscape screening to reinforce it’s boundary, would be appropriate. From the south, (viewpoint 11) the hilltop and east – west ridge is again dominant, screening most of the housing areas in South Molton which lie below this skyline. Mature vegetation on Trigley Lane screens the Community College from this aspect. From within the site, there are extensive views over wooded and open countryside from the hilltop and ridge to the east, which are currently not available to local people.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Landscape and Visual Analysis

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Site SMO H4 Visual Analysis Land West of Exeter Gate and George Nympton Road The site is visible from the west (see viewpoint 12). From this aspect, the skyline is dominated by existing development on the western edge of the town. The existing bungalows on Exeter Description gate and Buckingham Road face directly onto open countryside without the benefit of any The site comprising some 10Ha, between B3226 and Furzebray Farm on the south western landscape screening. On approaching the town from the west, there is no clear gateway to boundary of South Molton. Residential development lies to the east and north of the site. To the South Molton, as there is from the North and East approaches. west lies open countryside and woodland. Furzebray Farm is on the south wet tip of the site. The woodland around Furzebray effectively screens the southern edges of the site from the west. Landscape Character The Devon Landscape Assesment (1994) describes the character of the area around South Opportunities Molton as High Culm Measures. Devon County Council’s historic landscape characterisation It is believed that development of this site, if supported by a robust landscape treatment, could map defines the southern part of the site as modern enclosures. The northern field is defined have a beneficial impact by clearly defining the edge of the built up area of South Molton and as mediaeval enclosures based on strip fields, indicating that the existing hedgerows have providing a gateway to the town. historic significance. Constraints Landscape Designations. The existing developed skyline should be maintained. There are no landscape designations affecting the site. Recommendations Land Use, Landform and Vegetation • Development ought to sit below the existing developed skyline. Development to the The fields are used for grazing. The southern field is a caravan club licensed site, although south of the site to be of a scale where it is effectively screened by the existing woodland there are no facilities on the site. The land slopes westwards away from the town. The northern around Furzebray. fields are bounded by mature hedgerows, although there are no hedge boundaries to the • Retain and renovate existing hedgerows within the site south. Off site, there is an extensive area of farm woodland to the south west of the site. • Provide a landscape structure that creates a gateway to South Molton and clearly defines the edge of the town.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Landscape and Visual Analysis

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Appendix 2 Ecological Assessment – Prepared By Ambios Ecology

1.0 INTRODUCTION The survey is then extended to the upper floor where the same checks are made - though in addition wall tops and roof void structures (such as ridge boards and other Ambios Ecology LLP was commissioned by Midas Homes to conduct a baseline ecological timbers) are also examined. assessment of four sites on the edge of South Molton, Devon. An assessment was required to • If these inspections do not provide enough information to make a reasoned judgment on identify any ecological impacts that might arise as a result of development of the sites for the value of the building(s) to bats, an evening survey to identify bats leaving the housing. building(s) may also be undertaken; though this work is limited to the breeding season only (between May and September in any year). Mr Michael Cooke, an Operational Partner of Ambios Ecology, undertook the site surveys on the 27th of November 2007. At this time all land was checked for the presence of species and Badgers habitats of significant ecological value. Badgers and their setts are protected under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992. The field survey is used to search for badger setts, using the following methods: 2.0 SURVEY RATIONALE AND METHODS • The development area is walked and the ground checked for the presence of badgers’ The assessment rationale adopted for this survey is based upon the ‘Guidelines for Ecological setts. Impact Assessment in the United Kingdom’ (Institute of Ecology and Environmental • If evidence of badgers (e.g. runs, hairs and dung pits) is found around the site boundary, Management, 2006). A baseline ecological assessment is used to identify, quantify and and access is possible, the survey is extended off site for a distance of at least 30 evaluate the potential impacts of defined actions on ecosystems or their components. Further metres. information on the general survey rationale is provided in the appendices. • Any badger sets found within this search area are assessed for their likely ‘status’ (i.e. main sett or other). The method of assessment involves a field survey of the development area. The information obtained from the field survey allows an assessment of the likely impacts of the proposed work on the ecology of the following: This level of survey is deemed adequate in relation to most development schemes, as it identifies setts that may be directly affected by the works (i.e. setts located on the development Ecologically important habitats site itself), as well as setts that might be prone to disturbance (i.e. within 30 metres of the These habitats are identified on the ground and, where necessary, may be confirmed by development boundary). means of a data search with the local Biological Records Centre. They include Special Areas of Conservation (SAC’s), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), County Wildlife Sites Invasive species (CWS), Potential County Wildlife Sites (pCWS), Regionally Important Geological and The field survey includes a check for invasive species, particularly Japanese knotweed, Geomorphological Sites (RIGS), Ancient Woodland Inventory Sites (AWI) and Culm Grassland Himalayan balsam and giant hogweed, for which legislation and/or specific guidelines apply Sites (CGS). prior to excavation of the soil in which they are found.

Specially protected animal species The presence of plant species of significant nature conservation value These include all species listed under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, Such plant species are most likely to be associated with the ecologically important habitats such as dormice, otters, and bats. Habitat features likely to be of value to these species are identified by the fieldwork. also identified during the field survey. Presence of nesting birds Where an internal inspection of buildings is required to determine the presence/absence of During the breeding season (generally agreed to be between the 1st of March and 31st of July bats, the following methods are used: for most species likely to be encountered in such habitats), information on nesting birds is gathered wherever possible. • The building(s) are assessed externally for signs of bats. Cracks in walls are examined with use of a torch, and potentially access points (such as gaps under fascias, around (N.B. Cirl buntings are found in some parts of Devon and Cornwall, especially along the chimneys and ridge tiles) are viewed with binoculars. Any direct signs (such as southern coastal strip between Plymouth and Dawlish Warren. This species is a high droppings stuck to walls) as well as features of potential value to bats are noted. conservation priority in the UK, and can continue to breed into early September in any year. • An internal inspection of the building(s) is also undertaken. This starts on the ground Particular attention is paid to identifying potential impacts on this species where work is floor and involves a careful examination of door and window frames and lintels, wall planned in cirl bunting areas during the breeding season). voids and similar cavities. Floors and other surfaces are checked for bat droppings.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Biological value of hedgerows The biological value of hedgerows are assessed as part of the survey (using criteria from the Hedgerow Survey Handbook, Second Edition, DEFRA, 2007). General recommendations for working through hedges are also provided in Section 3.3.

Ecological value of water features All rivers, streams and smaller watercourses are assessed for their overall ecological value during the survey.

3.0 SURVEY FINDINGS

General description

The four sites, named Phases 1a, 1b, 2 and 3 are found around the edge of South Molton, and are shown in Figure 1 opposite.

Figure 1 – locations of sites at South Molton

All four sites comprise very similar land, namely intensively farmed pasture and arable, with well- managed hedge banks.

This report provides findings and recommendations for all four sites collectively. The locations of specific features of interest are identified by use of further maps.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

• The sites are not adjacent to woodland habitat • The sites are surrounded by roads and/or existing housing General habitat value • Internal hedges are fragmented and few appear to provide good-quality habitat for dormice Of the habitats present on the sites the hedgerows are likely to be of some value to local wildlife; in particular nesting birds.

A single field of semi-improved rush pasture lies at the western extreme of the Phase 1a site, as shown in Figure Bats 2 below. This is unlikely to be of county importance, but may be of some local value to wildlife. A number of agricultural buildings may provide opportunities for roosting bats. These are found in Phase 1a, as shown in Figure 3 below. Some mature hedges in all of the Phases may provide corridors (flight-lines) for commuting bats.

Figure 2 – location of rush pasture field

With the exception of these features however, the four sites comprise intensively farmed land that is relatively isolated from semi-natural habitats in the local area. As such they are unlikely to be of significant ecological value at either the National or County level.

(N.B. The potential presence of specially protected animal species cannot be discounted at the Figure 3 – Phase 1a showing location of farm buildings time of reporting, and as a result the above assessment will need to be conformed by further appropriate survey work. This is described in the relevant sections below). Reptiles

No evidence of reptiles was found on the sites at the time of survey, though this would not be expected Nesting birds during November. The few areas of rough grassland found on the sites are however unlikely to support It is almost certain that birds will use hedges and associated trees for nesting during the breeding reptile populations – they are limited in area (generally around buildings and field margins) and are season (i.e between the 1st of march and 31st August inclusive). isolated from other semi-natural habitats such as scrub/woodland edge.

The location of the sites means that no cirl buntings are likely to be found. Hedgerows

A number of hedgerows on all of the sites are botanically rich enough to be classed as ‘Biologically Important’ under the 1997 Hedgerows Regulations. None of the hedges are thought likely to provide suitable habitat for Schedule 5 animal species dormice (see section above for details).

Dormice Trees A number of semi-mature trees are found in hedgerows on all of the sites, though none appear to be associated None of the hedgerows on any of the sites are thought likely to provide suitable habitat for dormice, as: with cracks and other features that could be used by roosting bats and/or nesting birds.

Tree Preservation Orders (T.P.O.’s) may to apply to some of these trees.

• No large woodlands are found locally

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

practice’ provided in Bat Conservation Trust’s Bat Surveys – Good Practice Guidelines (BCT, Water features 2007). No water features are found on any of the sites. The survey results should be used to determine what (if any) mitigation is required as part of Badgers any proposed development. A single hole badger sett was found on the south/eastern perimeter of the Phase 1a site. This hole was however classed as disused at the time of survey. Reptiles Whilst no detailed mitigation is required, as a matter of best practice ‘tins’ or mats should be Invasive species placed in the few areas of rough grassland on all sites where small numbers of slow-worms No evidence of Japanese knotweed, Himalayan balsam or giant hogweed was found on any of may be found. This will ensure that no individuals are intentionally killed or injured as a result the sites at the time of survey - though it should be noted that some forms of Japanese of any development. This work would need to be undertaken in either the spring or autumn knotweed are difficult to identify, particularly during winter months or when obscured by taller immediately preceding the start of development. vegetation.

Hedgerows 4.0 MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS None of the hedges on any of the sites should be removed without consultation with the relevant local Planning Authority. Habitats Of the habitats present on the sites, the hedgerows and single field of rush pasture (Phase 1a site, as shown in Figure 2) are likely to be of most value to local wildlife. Trees No trees should be felled without due regard for the possible presence of nesting birds. Please The hedges may provide flight-lines for bats between feeding areas and nearby roosts. They refer to the relevant section above for proposed mitigation. As T.P.O.’s may apply to some may also be used by nesting birds. Recommendations relating to these species are provided trees, none should be felled without consultation with the relevant local Planning Authority. in the relevant sections below. Tree felling must utilise best practice in relation to the possible presence of roosting bats. The field of rush pasture may be botanically rich, and as such it is recommended that a further Whilst the survey did not identify any suitable trees, it is recommended that any contactor is survey be undertaken in June/July 2008 to confirm its ecological value. made aware of the standard guidelines provided by the relevant professional bodies and Bat Conservation Trust. Please contact Ambios Ecology for further advice if necessary. Nesting Birds A number of bird species are likely to breed in suitable hedges on all of the sites. It is an Badgers offence to damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird, and to disturb birds whilst nesting. Any No badger mitigation is currently required. However, should the sites remain undeveloped for clearance of vegetation should therefore be undertaken between mid-August and late any length of time (1 year+) it is strongly recommended that a follow-up survey of all sites be February, i.e. outside the main nesting season. If this is not possible Ambios Ecology should undertaken to ensure no changes in the current status have occurred. be contacted for further advice. Invasive species Schedule 5 animal species Whilst no evidence of Japanese knotweed was found during the survey, it is recommended that an additional search be made for this plant on all sites during the growing season (i.e.

between June and September), when it is more easily seen amongst other vegetation. Bats

The exact nature of bat activity on the sites is not known at the time of reporting, though BIBLIOGRAPHY potential impacts on bat populations may arise from disruption of flight-lines resulting from hedgerow removal. Batten, L. A., Bibby, C. J., Clement, P., Elliott, G. D. and Porter, R. F. (eds.) (1990) Red Data Birds in Britain. Poyser. It is recommended that a bat survey of the sites be undertaken between April and June 2008 to assess general flight activity across the site, as well as identify the presence of roosts within Institute of Environmental Assessment. (1995) Guidelines for Baseline Ecological exiting farm buildings on the Phase 1a site. This survey should be undertaken following ‘best Assessment. Chapman and Hall, London.

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Nature Conservancy Council (1990) Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey. England Field Unit, NCC.

RSPB (1996) Birds of Conservation Concern in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. RSPB, Sandy.

Stace, C. (1997) New Flora of the British Isles (2nd. edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Treweek, J. (1999) Ecological Impact Assessment. Blackwell, Oxford. APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 3 Consultation Consultation with relevant nature conservation bodies helps to define the likely ecological Criteria warranting Phase 2 survey Further survey work may be necessary if the baseline impacts of the proposed development. Reference is made to relevant published information, assessment identifies impacts on the following: such as the Ancient Woodland Inventory and the Invertebrate Site Register. Both statutory and non-statutory sites of nature conservation interest likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the development are also identified. Species and/or populations

APPENDIX 2 Rare species/populations (at national, regional or local level). Field survey Species/populations important in the functioning of an ecosystem.

A field survey is used to produce maps showing habitats likely to be affected by the development. or

The field surveyor will specifically identify: Sites

• The presence of plant species of significant nature conservation value. Sites of national, regional or local importance (as defined by Ratcliffe’s 1977 Nature • General habitat value. Conservation Review criteria). • Presence of nesting birds. Largely undisturbed semi-natural habitat (e.g. ancient woodland). • The presence of animal species listed under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, or habitat features likely to be of value to such species. • The biological value of hedgerows and subsequent identification of those sections requiring and notification under the 1997 Hedgerows Regulations. • Ecological value of water features. • Badger (Meles meles) activity within the survey area. Aspects of biodiversity that cannot easily be replaced • The presence of invasive species, particularly Japanese knotweed, Himalayan balsam and giant hogweed, for which legislation and specific guidelines apply prior to site development. Ancient semi-natural habitats. Ancient trees.

bios Ecology LLP was commissioned by Midas Homes to conduct a baseline ecological assessment of four sites on the edge of 2.0 SURVEY RATIONALE AND METHODS South Molton, Devon. An assessment was required to identify any ecological impacts that might arise as a result of development of the sites for housing. The assessment rationale adopted for this survey is based upon the ‘Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the United Kingdom’ (Institute of Ecology and Environmental Mr Michael Cooke, an Operational Partner of Ambios Ecology, undertook the site surveys on the 27th of November 2007. At Management, 2006). A baseline ecological assessment is used to identify, quantify and this time all land was checked for the presence of species and habitats of significant ecological value. evaluate the potential impacts of defined actions on ecosystems or their components. Further information

During the breeding season (generally agreed to be between the 1st of March and 31st of July The method of assessment involves a field survey of the development area. The information obtained from the field survey allows an assessment of the for most species likely to be encountered in such habitats), information on nesting birds is likely impacts of the proposed work on the ecology of the following: gathered wherever possible.

Ecologically important habitats (N.B. Cirl buntings are found in some parts of Devon and Cornwall, especially along the These habitats are identified on the ground and, where necessary, may be confirmed by means of a data search with the local southern coastal strip between Plymouth and Dawlish Warren. This species is a high Biological Records Centre. They include Special Areas of Conservation (SAC’s), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), conservation priority in the UK, and can continue to breed into early September in any year. Sites (RIGS), Ancient Woodland Inventory Sites (AWI) and Culm Grassland Sites (CGS). Particular attention is paid to identifying potential impacts on this species where work is planned in cirl bunting areas during the breeding season). Specially protected animal species These include all species listed under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, such as dormice, otters, and bats. Biological value of hedgerows Habitat features likely to be of value to these species are also identified during the field survey. The biological value of hedgerows are assessed as part of the survey (using criteria from the Hedgerow Survey Handbook, Second Edition, DEFRA, 2007). General recommendations for Where an internal inspection of buildings is required to determine the presence/absence of bats, the following methods are working through hedges are also provided in Section 3.3. used: Ecological value of water features • The building(s) are assessed externally for signs of bats. Cracks in walls are examined with use of a torch, and All rivers, streams and smaller watercourses are assessed for their overall ecological value potentially access points (such as gaps under fascias, around chimneys and ridge tiles) are viewed with binoculars. Any during the survey. direct signs (such as droppings stuck to walls) as well as features of potential value to bats are noted. • An internal inspection of the building(s) is also undertaken. This starts on the ground floor and involves a careful examination of door and window frames and lintels, wall voids and similar cavities. Floors and other surfaces are 3.0 SURVEY FINDINGS checked for bat droppings. The survey is then extended to the upper floor where the same checks are made - though in addition wall tops and roof void structures (such as ridge boards and other timbers) are also examined. General description • If these inspections do not provide enough information to make a reasoned judgment on the value of the building(s) to bats, an evening survey to identify bats leaving the building(s) may also be undertaken; though this work is limited to the The four sites, named Phases 1a, 1b, 2 and 3 are found around the edge of South Molton, and are breeding season only (between May and September in any year). shown in Figure 1 below.

Badgers Badgers and their setts are protected under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992. The field survey is used to search for badger setts, using the following methods:

• The development area is walked and the ground checked for the presence of badgers’ setts. • If evidence of badgers (e.g. runs, hairs and dung pits) is found around the site boundary, and access is possible, the survey is extended off site for a distance of at least 30 metres. • Any badger sets found within this search area are assessed for their likely ‘status’ (i.e. main sett or other).

This level of survey is deemed adequate in relation to most development schemes, as it identifies setts that may be directly affected by the works (i.e. setts located on the development site itself), as well as setts that might be prone to disturbance (i.e. within 30 metres of the development boundary).

Invasive species The field survey includes a check for invasive species, particularly Japanese knotweed, Himalayan balsam and giant hogweed, for which legislation and/or specific guidelines apply prior to excavation of the soil in which they are found.

The presence of plant species of significant nature conservation value Such plant species are most likely to be associated with the ecologically important habitats identified by the fieldwork.

Presence of nesting birds

General habitat value Of the habitats present on the sites the hedgerows are likely to be of some value to local wildlife; in particular nesting birds.

A single field of semi-improved rush pasture lies at the western extreme of the Phase 1a site, as shown in Figure 2 below. This is unlikely to be of county importance, but may be of some local value to wildlife.

Figure 2 – location of rush pasture field

With the exception of these features however, the four sites comprise intensively farmed land that is relatively isolated from semi-natural habitats in the local area. As such they are unlikely to be of significant ecological value at either the National or County level.

(N.B. The potential presence of specially protected animal species cannot be discounted at the time of reporting, and as a result the above assessment will need to be conformed by further appropriate survey work. This is described in the relevant sections below).

Nesting birds

It is almost certain that birds will use hedges and associated trees for nesting during the breeding season (i.e between the 1st of march and 31st August inclusive).

The location of the sites means that no cirl buntings are likely to be found.

Figure 1 – locations of sites at South Molton Schedule 5 animal species

All four sites comprise very similar land, namely intensively farmed pasture and arable, with well-managed hedge banks. Dormice

None of the hedgerows on any of the sites are thought likely to provide suitable habitat for dormice, as: This report provides findings and recommendations for all four sites collectively. The locations of specific features of interest are identified by use of further maps.

• No large woodlands are found locally

• The sites are not adjacent to woodland habitat • The sites are surrounded by roads and/or existing housing Water features • Internal hedges are fragmented and few appear to provide good-quality habitat for dormice No water features are found on any of the sites.

Bats Badgers A single hole badger sett was found on the south/eastern perimeter of the Phase 1a site. This A number of agricultural buildings may provide opportunities for roosting bats. These are found in Phase 1a, as shown in Figure 3 below. hole was however classed as disused at the time of survey. Some mature hedges in all of the Phases may provide corridors (flight-lines) for commuting bats. Invasive species

No evidence of Japanese knotweed, Himalayan balsam or giant hogweed was found on any of the sites at the time of survey - though it should be noted that some forms of Japanese knotweed are difficult to identify, particularly during winter months or when obscured by taller vegetation.

4.0 MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Habitats Of the habitats present on the sites, the hedgerows and single field of rush pasture (Phase 1a site, as shown in Figure 2) are likely to be of most value to local wildlife.

The hedges may provide flight-lines for bats between feeding areas and nearby roosts. They may also be used by nesting birds. Recommendations relating to these species are provided in the relevant sections below.

The field of rush pasture may be botanically rich, and as such it is recommended that a further – Phase survey be undertaken in June/July 2008 to confirm its ecological value. 1a showing Nesting Birds location A number of bird species are likely to breed in suitable hedges on all of the sites. It is an of farm offence to damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird, and to disturb birds whilst nesting. Any buildings clearance of vegetation should therefore be undertaken between mid-August and late

Reptiles February, i.e. outside the main nesting season. If this is not possible Ambios Ecology should No evidence of reptiles was found on the sites at the time of survey, though this would not be expected during November. The few areas be contacted for further advice. of rough grassland found on the sites are however unlikely to support reptile populations – they are limited in area (generally around Schedule 5 animal species buildings and field margins) and are isolated from other semi-natural habitats such as scrub/woodland edge.

Bats Hedgerows

A number of hedgerows on all of the sites are botanically rich enough to be classed as ‘Biologically Important’ under the 1997 Hedgerows Regulations. The exact nature of bat activity on the sites is not known at the time of reporting, though None of the hedges are thought likely to provide suitable habitat for dormice (see section above for details). potential impacts on bat populations may arise from disruption of flight-lines resulting from hedgerow removal. Trees A number of semi-mature trees are found in hedgerows on all of the sites, though none appear to be associated with cracks and other features that could It is recommended that a bat survey of the sites be undertaken between April and June 2008 to be used by roosting bats and/or nesting birds. assess general flight activity across the site, as well as identify the presence of roosts within exiting farm buildings on the Phase 1a site. This survey should be undertaken following ‘best Tree Preservation Orders (T.P.O.’s) may to apply to some of these trees.

practice’ provided in Bat Conservation Trust’s Bat Surveys – Good Practice Guidelines (BCT, 2007). BIBLIOGRAPHY

The survey results should be used to determine what (if any) mitigation is required as part of any proposed development. Batten, L. A., Bibby, C. J., Clement, P., Elliott, G. D. and Porter, R. F. (eds.) (1990) Red Data Birds in Britain. Poyser. Reptiles Whilst no detailed mitigation is required, as a matter of best practice ‘tins’ or mats should be placed in the few areas of rough Institute of Environmental Assessment. (1995) Guidelines for Baseline Ecological grassland on all sites where small numbers of slow-worms may be found. This will ensure that no individuals are intentionally Assessment. Chapman and Hall, London. killed or injured as a result of any development. This work would need to be undertaken in either the spring or autumn immediately preceding the start of development. Nature Conservancy Council (1990) Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey. England Field Unit, NCC.

Hedgerows RSPB (1996) Birds of Conservation Concern in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. None of the hedges on any of the sites should be removed without consultation with the relevant local Planning Authority. RSPB, Sandy.

Trees Stace, C. (1997) New Flora of the British Isles (2nd. edition). Cambridge University Press, No trees should be felled without due regard for the possible presence of nesting birds. Please refer to the relevant section Cambridge. above for proposed mitigation. As T.P.O.’s may apply to some trees, none should be felled without consultation with the relevant local Planning Authority. Treweek, J. (1999) Ecological Impact Assessment. Blackwell, Oxford.

Tree felling must utilise best practice in relation to the possible presence of roosting bats. Whilst the survey did not identify any suitable trees, it is recommended that any contactor is made aware of the standard guidelines provided by the relevant professional bodies and Bat Conservation Trust. Please contact Ambios Ecology for further advice if necessary.

Badgers No badger mitigation is currently required. However, should the sites remain undeveloped for any length of time (1 year+) it is strongly recommended that a follow-up survey of all sites be undertaken to ensure no changes in the current status have occurred.

Invasive species Whilst no evidence of Japanese knotweed was found during the survey, it is recommended that an additional search be made for this plant on all sites during the growing season (i.e. between June and September), when it is more easily seen amongst other vegetation.

APPENDIX 1 Appendix 3 Highways Appraisal – Prepared by Peter Brett Associates

South Molton is a small town with a population of over 4000, about ten miles south-east of Barnstaple. It small number of residential properties, Aclands, a pleasant estate with a small number of properties, has been the focal point for growth and regeneration in north Devon, lying as it does at the centre of the South Molton cemetery, and Alswear New Road, all bound the site to the north, with fields and the open Priority Area for Rural Regeneration. The town is relatively self-contained, with the new developments countryside bounding the site to the south and east. adding to a number of well established communities. There is also a good supply of employment land within the town at the older sites in the town centre, as well as the new “Pathfields” estate to the north of The proposed development is partly residential and partly for college and community use, with plans to the town. develop sports facilities, including a rugby pitch and potential rugby club on a total developable area of 4.45 hectares. Pedestrian access to the town centre, and to the bus services in the town are good, and The North Devon Local Plan identified South Molton as the major Area Centre in the Plan, recognising access from the site to the A361 is straightforward albeit through the town centre, and convenient, that it has substantial potential along with its location advantages to meet the employment and housing making this site suitable for residential development with regard to accessibility. needs of a wide hinterland of this part of North Devon. Phase 3, in the south west of the town, is bounded to the north by South Street, which is the main road South Molton is also comparatively well served by retail and leisure activities, with a number of shops out of the town in a south-westerly direction, and gives direct access to the town centre. The site on the high street, and clubs for badminton, bowling, bridge, soccer, gymnastics, judo, rugby, running borders Exeter Gate, a modern residential cul-de-sac, and George Nympton Road, a useful secondary and tennis. The town also has good links to the surrounding area, with the A361, one of the main roads access road, with a small number of residential properties, to the east. The site also borders a small in north Devon, being just over 2 km north of the town along North Road, or 1 km east of the town along farm lane off George Nympton Road to the south, which connects the farm to the main road, and East Street. This road enables excellent access to Barnstaple and the surrounding towns and villages to provides a second access point to the site, with fields bordering the west side of the development. the north-west, and also, 40 km to the south-east is the M5, providing a convenient route to the city of Exeter. The site is very close to South Molton Community College, and the community hospital, and still well within walking distance of the town centre, which is accessible via South Street. Although it is the The proposed development is on three distinct phases, located on three different sites in the town; furthest away of the phases from the A361, it still has straightforward and direct access to the road, phase one to the north-west has good access to the main roads; to the south, phase two is adjacent to through the town centre, making this site a suitable location for residential development with regard to South Molton Community College and has good access to Alswear New Road; and phase three, to the accessibility. south-west, is situated in an idyllic area and has good access to South Street. The development falls naturally into RSS Policy B which requires that the scale of development at market towns should be There are a good range of local facilities in South Molton, including all of the necessary facilities for day- dependent on their function. to-day life, which are listed below:

Phase 1, to the north west of the town is closest to the town centre, and has very good access to the Schools primary school, and a recreation ground, along with nearby leisure facilities, a hospital, and bus - Hollyoak Nursery and Pre-School - Mill St (Town centre [south]) services from the town centre. It is split into two separate sites, 1a to the north, and 1b to the south of - South Molton infant school - North Road (north SM) Gunswell lane. - South Molton community college - Old Alswear Road (south SM)

Phase 1a is bounded to the south by Gunswell lane, a small lane which provides access to the primary Health school, and Frog Lane, a narrow lane which is exclusively for farm use. With North Road, one of two - South Molton community hospital – Widgery Dr (west SM) main access roads to the town for the A361, bounding the site to the east, and Deerhill Lane, another - South Molton health centre – East St (town centre) narrow farm lane, along with field boundaries, marking out the site to the north and west. Leisure Phase 1b is bounded to the south by Nadder Lane, the main westward road out of South Molton, and by - South Molton swimming pool – Mill Street (Town centre [south]) Gunswell Lane to the north. Existing houses and fields bound the remainder of the site to the east and - Smart Fitness – Barnstaple Street (town centre) west respectively. These sites will be used for residential development, with 4.8 and 3.8 hectares of - South Molton Museum - The Square (town centre) developable land providing approximately 190, and 150 units respectively. Phase 2 is an irregular shaped site in the south-east of the town, just over half a kilometre from the town centre, and alongside South Molton Community College. It is also just a few hundred metres from a Given that South Molton is such a small town, these facilities are all easily accessible from all of the local convenience store and sports facilities. The site is bounded to the south by Old Alswear Road, the sites, with the furthest facility from phase 1 being a kilometre away, and the furthest facility from phases main south-easterly road out of the town, and also a direct route from the site to the town centre, and by 2 and 3 being a little more than a kilometre. The use of a car would not be required for journeys within South Molton Community College grounds to the west. Williamson Way, a small cul-de-sac with a very

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

South Molton, however if a journey needed to be made outside of the town, then there is excellent only George Nympton – South access to the A361 for cars, plus a comprehensive bus schedule as detailed below: Molton 663S Turners tours Mon – Fri School run Meshaw – Alswear – George Table 1: Bus services only Nympton – South Molton 696 TW coaches Thursdays 1 journey East Anstey – Oldways End – Route Operator Days Frequency Destination only Yeo Mill – Molland – Bishops no. Nympton – South Molton

7 First Western Mon – Sat Half hourly Barnstaple – Landkey – 855 Turners tours Mon – Sat 3 journeys South Molton circular (local

National only Swimbridge – South Molton – only services) Mill on the Mole 856 Turners tours Mon – Sat 3 journeys South Molton – North Molton

106 Stagecoach Mon – Fri School run Barnstaple (north Devon only only 2 journeys college) – South Molton – 859 Turners tours Mon – Sat 2 journeys South Molton – Chittlehampton Witheridge – North Molton only 155 Stagecoach Mon – Sat 5 journeys South Molton – Barnstaple 873 TW coaches Thursdays 2 journeys Brayford – West Buckland – only only East Buckland – South Molton 337 Stagecoach Mon – Sat 1 journey Barnstaple – South Molton – T6 Turners tours Mondays 1 journey South Molton – Swimbridge – only Combsland Cross – Oakford – only Landkey – Barnstaple (Tesco) Bampton – Shillingford – X12 Spearings, Mon – Fri School run Ilfracombe – Braunton – Waterrow – Wiveliscombe – Cullompton only Barnstaple – South Molton - Hillcommon – Norton Fitzwarren Tiverton – Taunton 657 TW coaches Fridays 1 journey South Molton – North Molton – This review has shown that the South Molton sites are all suitable locations for residential development, only High Bray – Brayford – due to their close proximity to the town centre and other essential facilities, and because of their Goodleigh – Barnstaple excellent accessibility within the local highways network. 657S TW coaches Mon – Fri School run Hunstone Cross – Brayford – only South Molton 660 Turners tours Mon – Sat 3 journeys South Molton – Bishops only Nympton 663 Turners tours Thursdays 1 journey Chulmleigh – Kings Nympton –

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

Appendix 4 inequality Molton Sustainability Matrices – Prepared by Tom Jones 3.1b Indices of deprivation No impact. 3.1c GVA per head Good access to Deerhill Lane SMO H1 employment in South High Level Objective 1: Create communities that meet people’s needs Molton 1.1 Provide suitable 1.1a Number of dwellings 190 units could be delivered 3.2 Diversify the range of 3.2a Number of VAT Would provide homes housing that meets the completed annually during the Plan period local employment registered businesses adjacent to employment, a needs of the population and 1.1b Number of affordable The appropriate level of opportunities key DPD Objective. maximise affordable dwellings completed affordable housing could be 3.2b New firms: registration Would provide homes housing annually delivered. adjacent to employment, a 1.2 Reduce crime and the 1.2a Overall crime rates No known problems. key DPD Objective. fear of crime 3.2c Number of applications Not relevant 1.3 Create and sustain 1.3a % of development on Not pdl. for the change of use of vibrant towns and villages previously developed land buildings in the countryside 1.3b % of completed retail, Housing offers the 3.2d Number of Not relevant office and leisure strongest option to balance applications for farm development or number of the need to travel. diversification schemes applications approved NDDC/TDC has indicated 3.3 Promote sustainable 3.3a Number of tourists and Not relevant potential for another site to tourism value of expenditure meet needs. 3.3b Number of Not relevant 1.4 Improve access to key 1.4a % of new development Residents could access applications granted for the services, employment within 1km of main employment opportunities change of use of buildings areas and facilities for all employment areas or good by walking to holiday units sectors of the community public transport links High Level Objective 4: Provide access and secure a shift toward more sustainable 1.4b % of urban and rural Residents could access forms of transport residential population within employment opportunities 4.1 Reduce the overall 4.1a % of new development Good access to South walking distance of key by walking need to travel by car within walking and cycling Molton by walking and services distance of retail and leisure cycling. 1.5 Provide access to 1.5a Qualifications of Not relevant facilities learning, training, skills and working age population 4.1b % of new development South Molton accessible knowledge for everyone 1.5b % of people aged 16- Not relevant within 30 minutes public within 30 minutes using the 74 with no qualifications transport (including walking existing public transport 1.6 Reduce poverty and 1.6a % of households with Not relevant and cycling) time of a GP, system. Development deprivation <£15,000 income hospital, primary and could enhance the viability High Level Objective 2: Health and Well-Being secondary school, of public transport. 2.1 Improve health of 2.1a Life expectancy Good access to leisure and employment and a major population and reduce recreation health centre health inequalities 2.1b % of people who Good access to leisure and 4.2 Make public transport, 4.2a % travel to work by See 4.1a and 4.1b. describe their health as recreation walking and cycling easier mode good or not good and more attractive 4.2b Number of green travel Could be delivered 2.1c loss/gain of sports and Potential to support plans recreational facilities enhancement 4.2c Number of applications Potential to enhance 2.1d loss/gain of pedestrian Potential to support including improvements to walking and cycling and cycle routes and open enhancement walking and /or cycle route spaces network High Level Objective 3: Promote sustainable economic growth 3.1 Reduce unemployment 3.1a Unemployment rates Good access to High Level Objective 5: Safeguard environmental quality and assets levels and income employment in South 5.1 Protect and enhance 5.1a Number, area and No harm. Opportunity to

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response biodiversity and important condition of designated provide new or enhance High Level Objective 6: Use of natural resources wildlife habitats areas existing habitat. 6.1 Reduce non-renewable 6.1a Energy consumption Subject to the detailed 5.1b Change in priority No significant harm likely. energy consumption and project plan. habitats and species (by greenhouse gas emissions 6.1b Emissions of Subject to the detailed type) and change in areas district wide greenhouse gases by project plan and design. designated for their intrinsic sector and per capita environmental value (tonnes per year) including sites of 6.1c Mix of RE installed by Subject to the detailed international, national, type (%) project plan and design. regional, subregional or 6.1d District wide installed Subject to the detailed local significance RE capacity (MWe) project plan and design. 5.2 Protect and enhance 5.2a Extent of ‘good’ quality No loss 1, 2 or 3a. 6.1e Number of applications Subject to the detailed the countryside, natural agricultural land used for for RE installations project plan and design. landscape and townscape development 6.2 Improve energy 6.2a New buildings using Subject to the detailed 5.2b % of new development Not pdl. efficiency and use of sustainably sourced project plan and design. and converted buildings on sustainable construction materials (total number of previously developed land materials %) 5.2c Area of Greenfield land The site is not within and 6.3 Maintain and enhance 6.3a Levels of main air The site is not within an allocated for new would not adversely impact air quality pollutants AQMA and there are no development a landscape designation. predicted incidences of 5.3 Maintain and enhance 5.3a Number of listed No impact exceedance during the plan heritage assets and their buildings at risk period. settings 5.3b Number of No impact 6.4 Protect the quality of 6.4a Watercourses See 5.4b conservation areas local water resources classified as good or fair 5.4 Reduce the impact of 5.4a Number of planning Consistent with PPS25 biological quality flooding and avoid applications granted sequential test. 6.4b Watercourses See 5.4b additional risk of flooding contrary to advice from the classified as good or fair Environment Agency on chemical quality either flood defence 6.5 Protect high grade soils 6.5a Area of BMV No impact grounds or water quality agricultural land lost to 5.4b % of new development Likely to be feasible development with sustainable drainage installed 5.5 Reduce the amount of 5.5a % of municipal waste Subject to the detailed landfill waste and promote generated disposed to project plan and design. recycling and the use of landfill recycled goods 5.5b kg of household waste Subject to the detailed collected project plan and design. 5.5c amount of waste Subject to the detailed recycled, composted or project plan and design. used to recover heat, power or other energy sources 5.6 Minimise light and noise 5.6a % principal road Subject to the detailed pollution network covered by low project plan and design. noise surfaces 5.6b New developments Subject to the detailed conforming to Institute of project plan and design. Light Engineers Dark Skies Guidance

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

3.1c GVA per head Good access to Nadder/Gunswell Lanes SMO H2 employment in South High Level Objective 1: Create communities that meet people’s needs Molton 1.1 Provide suitable 1.1a Number of dwellings 151 units could be delivered 3.2 Diversify the range of 3.2a Number of VAT Would provide homes housing that meets the completed annually during the Plan period local employment registered businesses adjacent to employment, a needs of the population and 1.1b Number of affordable The appropriate level of opportunities key DPD Objective. maximise affordable dwellings completed affordable housing could be 3.2b New firms: registration Would provide homes housing annually delivered. adjacent to employment, a 1.2 Reduce crime and the 1.2a Overall crime rates No known problems. key DPD Objective. fear of crime 3.2c Number of applications Not relevant 1.3 Create and sustain 1.3a % of development on Not pdl. for the change of use of vibrant towns and villages previously developed land buildings in the countryside 1.3b % of completed retail, Housing offers the 3.2d Number of Not relevant office and leisure strongest option to balance applications for farm development or number of the need to travel. diversification schemes applications approved NDDC/TDC has indicated 3.3 Promote sustainable 3.3a Number of tourists and Not relevant potential for another site to tourism value of expenditure meet needs. 3.3b Number of Not relevant 1.4 Improve access to key 1.4a % of new development Residents could access applications granted for the services, employment within 1km of main employment opportunities change of use of buildings areas and facilities for all employment areas or good by walking to holiday units sectors of the community public transport links High Level Objective 4: Provide access and secure a shift toward more sustainable 1.4b % of urban and rural Residents could access forms of transport residential population within employment opportunities 4.1 Reduce the overall 4.1a % of new development Good access to South walking distance of key by walking need to travel by car within walking and cycling Molton by walking and services distance of retail and leisure cycling. 1.5 Provide access to 1.5a Qualifications of Not relevant facilities learning, training, skills and working age population 4.1b % of new development South Molton accessible knowledge for everyone 1.5b % of people aged 16- Not relevant within 30 minutes public within 30 minutes using the 74 with no qualifications transport (including walking existing public transport 1.6 Reduce poverty and 1.6a % of households with Not relevant and cycling) time of a GP, system. Development deprivation <£15,000 income hospital, primary and could enhance the viability High Level Objective 2: Health and Well-Being secondary school, of public transport. 2.1 Improve health of 2.1a Life expectancy Good access to leisure and employment and a major population and reduce recreation health centre health inequalities 2.1b % of people who Good access to leisure and 4.2 Make public transport, 4.2a % travel to work by See 4.1a and 4.1b. describe their health as recreation walking and cycling easier mode good or not good and more attractive 4.2b Number of green travel Could be delivered 2.1c loss/gain of sports and Potential to support plans recreational facilities enhancement 4.2c Number of applications Potential to enhance 2.1d loss/gain of pedestrian Potential to support including improvements to walking and cycling and cycle routes and open enhancement walking and /or cycle route spaces network High Level Objective 3: Promote sustainable economic growth High Level Objective 5: Safeguard environmental quality and assets 3.1 Reduce unemployment 3.1a Unemployment rates Good access to 5.1 Protect and enhance 5.1a Number, area and No harm. Opportunity to levels and income employment in South biodiversity and important condition of designated provide new or enhance inequality Molton wildlife habitats areas existing habitat. 3.1b Indices of deprivation No impact. 5.1b Change in priority No significant harm likely. habitats and species (by

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

type) and change in areas energy consumption and project plan. designated for their intrinsic greenhouse gas emissions 6.1b Emissions of Subject to the detailed environmental value district wide greenhouse gases by project plan and design. including sites of sector and per capita international, national, (tonnes per year) regional, subregional or 6.1c Mix of RE installed by Subject to the detailed local significance type (%) project plan and design. 5.2 Protect and enhance 5.2a Extent of ‘good’ quality No loss 1, 2 or 3a. 6.1d District wide installed Subject to the detailed the countryside, natural agricultural land used for RE capacity (MWe) project plan and design. landscape and townscape development 6.1e Number of applications Subject to the detailed 5.2b % of new development Not pdl. for RE installations project plan and design. and converted buildings on 6.2 Improve energy 6.2a New buildings using Subject to the detailed previously developed land efficiency and use of sustainably sourced project plan and design. 5.2c Area of Greenfield land The site is not within and sustainable construction materials (total number of allocated for new would not adversely impact materials %) development a landscape designation. 6.3 Maintain and enhance 6.3a Levels of main air The site is not within an 5.3 Maintain and enhance 5.3a Number of listed No impact air quality pollutants AQMA and there are no heritage assets and their buildings at risk predicted incidences of settings 5.3b Number of No impact exceedance during the plan conservation areas period. 5.4 Reduce the impact of 5.4a Number of planning Consistent with PPS25 6.4 Protect the quality of 6.4a Watercourses See 5.4b flooding and avoid applications granted sequential test. local water resources classified as good or fair additional risk of flooding contrary to advice from the biological quality Environment Agency on 6.4b Watercourses See 5.4b either flood defence classified as good or fair grounds or water quality chemical quality 5.4b % of new development Likely to be feasible 6.5 Protect high grade soils 6.5a Area of BMV No impact with sustainable drainage agricultural land lost to installed development 5.5 Reduce the amount of 5.5a % of municipal waste Subject to the detailed landfill waste and promote generated disposed to project plan and design. recycling and the use of landfill recycled goods 5.5b kg of household waste Subject to the detailed collected project plan and design. 5.5c amount of waste Subject to the detailed recycled, composted or project plan and design. used to recover heat, power or other energy sources 5.6 Minimise light and noise 5.6a % principal road Subject to the detailed pollution network covered by low project plan and design. noise surfaces 5.6b New developments Subject to the detailed conforming to Institute of project plan and design. Light Engineers Dark Skies Guidance

High Level Objective 6: Use of natural resources 6.1 Reduce non-renewable 6.1a Energy consumption Subject to the detailed

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

3.1c GVA per head Good access to George Nympton Road SMO H4 employment in South High Level Objective 1: Create communities that meet people’s needs Molton 1.1 Provide suitable 1.1a Number of dwellings 156 units could be delivered 3.2 Diversify the range of 3.2a Number of VAT Would provide homes housing that meets the completed annually during the Plan period local employment registered businesses adjacent to employment, a needs of the population and 1.1b Number of affordable The appropriate level of opportunities key DPD Objective. maximise affordable dwellings completed affordable housing could be 3.2b New firms: registration Would provide homes housing annually delivered. adjacent to employment, a 1.2 Reduce crime and the 1.2a Overall crime rates No known problems. key DPD Objective. fear of crime 3.2c Number of applications Not relevant 1.3 Create and sustain 1.3a % of development on Not pdl. for the change of use of vibrant towns and villages previously developed land buildings in the countryside 1.3b % of completed retail, Housing offers the 3.2d Number of Not relevant office and leisure strongest option to balance applications for farm development or number of the need to travel. diversification schemes applications approved NDDC/TDC has indicated 3.3 Promote sustainable 3.3a Number of tourists and Not relevant potential for another site to tourism value of expenditure meet needs. 3.3b Number of Not relevant 1.4 Improve access to key 1.4a % of new development Residents could access applications granted for the services, employment within 1km of main employment opportunities change of use of buildings areas and facilities for all employment areas or good by walking to holiday units sectors of the community public transport links High Level Objective 4: Provide access and secure a shift toward more sustainable 1.4b % of urban and rural Residents could access forms of transport residential population within employment opportunities 4.1 Reduce the overall 4.1a % of new development Good access to South walking distance of key by walking need to travel by car within walking and cycling Molton by walking and services distance of retail and leisure cycling. 1.5 Provide access to 1.5a Qualifications of Not relevant facilities learning, training, skills and working age population 4.1b % of new development South Molton accessible knowledge for everyone 1.5b % of people aged 16- Not relevant within 30 minutes public within 30 minutes using the 74 with no qualifications transport (including walking existing public transport 1.6 Reduce poverty and 1.6a % of households with Not relevant and cycling) time of a GP, system. Development deprivation <£15,000 income hospital, primary and could enhance the viability High Level Objective 2: Health and Well-Being secondary school, of public transport. 2.1 Improve health of 2.1a Life expectancy Good access to leisure and employment and a major population and reduce recreation health centre health inequalities 2.1b % of people who Good access to leisure and 4.2 Make public transport, 4.2a % travel to work by See 4.1a and 4.1b. describe their health as recreation walking and cycling easier mode good or not good and more attractive 4.2b Number of green travel Could be delivered 2.1c loss/gain of sports and Potential to support plans recreational facilities enhancement 4.2c Number of applications Potential to enhance 2.1d loss/gain of pedestrian Potential to support including improvements to walking and cycling and cycle routes and open enhancement walking and /or cycle route spaces network High Level Objective 3: Promote sustainable economic growth High Level Objective 5: Safeguard environmental quality and assets 3.1 Reduce unemployment 3.1a Unemployment rates Good access to 5.1 Protect and enhance 5.1a Number, area and No harm. Opportunity to levels and income employment in South biodiversity and important condition of designated provide new or enhance inequality Molton wildlife habitats areas existing habitat. 3.1b Indices of deprivation No impact. 5.1b Change in priority No significant harm likely. habitats and species (by

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

type) and change in areas district wide greenhouse gases by project plan and design. designated for their intrinsic sector and per capita environmental value (tonnes per year) including sites of 6.1c Mix of RE installed by Subject to the detailed international, national, type (%) project plan and design. regional, subregional or 6.1d District wide installed Subject to the detailed local significance RE capacity (MWe) project plan and design. 5.2 Protect and enhance 5.2a Extent of ‘good’ quality Loss of 3a. 6.1e Number of applications Subject to the detailed the countryside, natural agricultural land used for for RE installations project plan and design. landscape and townscape development 6.2 Improve energy 6.2a New buildings using Subject to the detailed 5.2b % of new development Not pdl. efficiency and use of sustainably sourced project plan and design. and converted buildings on sustainable construction materials (total number of previously developed land materials %) 5.2c Area of Greenfield land The site is not within and 6.3 Maintain and enhance 6.3a Levels of main air The site is not within an allocated for new would not adversely impact air quality pollutants AQMA and there are no development a landscape designation. predicted incidences of 5.3 Maintain and enhance 5.3a Number of listed No impact exceedance during the plan heritage assets and their buildings at risk period. settings 5.3b Number of No impact 6.4 Protect the quality of 6.4a Watercourses See 5.4b conservation areas local water resources classified as good or fair 5.4 Reduce the impact of 5.4a Number of planning Consistent with PPS25 biological quality flooding and avoid applications granted sequential test. 6.4b Watercourses See 5.4b additional risk of flooding contrary to advice from the classified as good or fair Environment Agency on chemical quality either flood defence 6.5 Protect high grade soils 6.5a Area of BMV No impact grounds or water quality agricultural land lost to 5.4b % of new development Likely to be feasible development with sustainable drainage installed 5.5 Reduce the amount of 5.5a % of municipal waste Subject to the detailed landfill waste and promote generated disposed to project plan and design. recycling and the use of landfill recycled goods 5.5b kg of household waste Subject to the detailed collected project plan and design. 5.5c amount of waste Subject to the detailed recycled, composted or project plan and design. used to recover heat, power or other energy sources 5.6 Minimise light and noise 5.6a % principal road Subject to the detailed pollution network covered by low project plan and design. noise surfaces 5.6b New developments Subject to the detailed conforming to Institute of project plan and design. Light Engineers Dark Skies Guidance High Level Objective 6: Use of natural resources 6.1 Reduce non-renewable 6.1a Energy consumption Subject to the detailed energy consumption and project plan. greenhouse gas emissions 6.1b Emissions of Subject to the detailed

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

3.1c GVA per head Good access to Alswear Road SMO H5 employment in South High Level Objective 1: Create communities that meet people’s needs Molton 1.1 Provide suitable 1.1a Number of dwellings 173 units could be delivered 3.2 Diversify the range of 3.2a Number of VAT Would provide homes housing that meets the completed annually during the Plan period local employment registered businesses adjacent to employment, a needs of the population and 1.1b Number of affordable The appropriate level of opportunities key DPD Objective. maximise affordable dwellings completed affordable housing could be 3.2b New firms: registration Would provide homes housing annually delivered. adjacent to employment, a 1.2 Reduce crime and the 1.2a Overall crime rates No known problems. key DPD Objective. fear of crime 3.2c Number of applications Not relevant 1.3 Create and sustain 1.3a % of development on Not pdl. for the change of use of vibrant towns and villages previously developed land buildings in the countryside 1.3b % of completed retail, Housing offers the 3.2d Number of Not relevant office and leisure strongest option to balance applications for farm development or number of the need to travel. diversification schemes applications approved NDDC/TDC has indicated 3.3 Promote sustainable 3.3a Number of tourists and Not relevant potential for another site to tourism value of expenditure meet needs. 3.3b Number of Not relevant 1.4 Improve access to key 1.4a % of new development Residents could access applications granted for the services, employment within 1km of main employment opportunities change of use of buildings areas and facilities for all employment areas or good by walking to holiday units sectors of the community public transport links High Level Objective 4: Provide access and secure a shift toward more sustainable 1.4b % of urban and rural Residents could access forms of transport residential population within employment opportunities 4.1 Reduce the overall 4.1a % of new development Good access to South walking distance of key by walking need to travel by car within walking and cycling Molton by walking and services distance of retail and leisure cycling. 1.5 Provide access to 1.5a Qualifications of Not relevant facilities learning, training, skills and working age population 4.1b % of new development South Molton accessible knowledge for everyone 1.5b % of people aged 16- Not relevant within 30 minutes public within 30 minutes using the 74 with no qualifications transport (including walking existing public transport 1.6 Reduce poverty and 1.6a % of households with Not relevant and cycling) time of a GP, system. Development deprivation <£15,000 income hospital, primary and could enhance the viability High Level Objective 2: Health and Well-Being secondary school, of public transport. 2.1 Improve health of 2.1a Life expectancy Good access to leisure and employment and a major population and reduce recreation health centre health inequalities 2.1b % of people who Good access to leisure and 4.2 Make public transport, 4.2a % travel to work by See 4.1a and 4.1b. describe their health as recreation walking and cycling easier mode good or not good and more attractive 4.2b Number of green travel Could be delivered 2.1c loss/gain of sports and Potential to support plans recreational facilities enhancement 4.2c Number of applications Potential to enhance 2.1d loss/gain of pedestrian Potential to support including improvements to walking and cycling and cycle routes and open enhancement walking and /or cycle route spaces network High Level Objective 3: Promote sustainable economic growth High Level Objective 5: Safeguard environmental quality and assets 3.1 Reduce unemployment 3.1a Unemployment rates Good access to 5.1 Protect and enhance 5.1a Number, area and No harm. Opportunity to levels and income employment in South biodiversity and important condition of designated provide new or enhance inequality Molton wildlife habitats areas existing habitat. 3.1b Indices of deprivation No impact. 5.1b Change in priority No significant harm likely. habitats and species (by

South Molton (SMO)

Core Strategy Response

type) and change in areas district wide greenhouse gases by project plan and design. designated for their intrinsic sector and per capita environmental value (tonnes per year) including sites of 6.1c Mix of RE installed by Subject to the detailed international, national, type (%) project plan and design. regional, subregional or 6.1d District wide installed Subject to the detailed local significance RE capacity (MWe) project plan and design. 5.2 Protect and enhance 5.2a Extent of ‘good’ quality Loss of 3a. 6.1e Number of applications Subject to the detailed the countryside, natural agricultural land used for for RE installations project plan and design. landscape and townscape development 6.2 Improve energy 6.2a New buildings using Subject to the detailed 5.2b % of new development Not pdl. efficiency and use of sustainably sourced project plan and design. and converted buildings on sustainable construction materials (total number of previously developed land materials %) 5.2c Area of Greenfield land The site is not within and 6.3 Maintain and enhance 6.3a Levels of main air The site is not within an allocated for new would not adversely impact air quality pollutants AQMA and there are no development a landscape designation. predicted incidences of 5.3 Maintain and enhance 5.3a Number of listed No impact exceedance during the plan heritage assets and their buildings at risk period. settings 5.3b Number of No impact 6.4 Protect the quality of 6.4a Watercourses See 5.4b conservation areas local water resources classified as good or fair 5.4 Reduce the impact of 5.4a Number of planning Consistent with PPS25 biological quality flooding and avoid applications granted sequential test. 6.4b Watercourses See 5.4b additional risk of flooding contrary to advice from the classified as good or fair Environment Agency on chemical quality either flood defence 6.5 Protect high grade soils 6.5a Area of BMV No impact grounds or water quality agricultural land lost to 5.4b % of new development Likely to be feasible development with sustainable drainage installed 5.5 Reduce the amount of 5.5a % of municipal waste Subject to the detailed landfill waste and promote generated disposed to project plan and design. recycling and the use of landfill recycled goods 5.5b kg of household waste Subject to the detailed collected project plan and design. 5.5c amount of waste Subject to the detailed recycled, composted or project plan and design. used to recover heat, power or other energy sources 5.6 Minimise light and noise 5.6a % principal road Subject to the detailed pollution network covered by low project plan and design. noise surfaces 5.6b New developments Subject to the detailed conforming to Institute of project plan and design. Light Engineers Dark Skies Guidance High Level Objective 6: Use of natural resources 6.1 Reduce non-renewable 6.1a Energy consumption Subject to the detailed energy consumption and project plan. greenhouse gas emissions 6.1b Emissions of Subject to the detailed