<<

W&M ScholarWorks

Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects

1973

Plasma Concentrations and Ovarian Histology in Prairie Deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus Bairdii) from Experimental Laboratory Populations

Barry Douglas Albertson College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd

Part of the Biology Commons, and the Endocrinology Commons

Recommended Citation Albertson, Barry Douglas, "Plasma Progesterone Concentrations and Ovarian Histology in Prairie Deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus Bairdii) from Experimental Laboratory Populations" (1973). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624808. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-7nsc-4k85

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLASMA PPDGESTEPONE CDNCCNTPATIONS AND OVARIAN HISTOLOGY I ’ IN PRAIRIE DEERMICE (PE.RCITYSCUS MANIOJLATUS RAIRDII) FROM EXPERIMENTAL LABORATORY POPULATIONS

A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Biology The College of William and Mary in Virginia

In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts

by Barry Douglas Albertson APPROVAL SHEET

This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Arts

t (XATl-L, P. 0 iLiis X]Author

Approved, July, 1973

(S- v u . EricOik L. Bradley, Ph. D.

C. RicnardTTferriiah, Ph. ■W) D. fl&itjh (- f- Robert E. u. Black, Phi D. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author would like to express his appreciation to Dr. Eric L. Bradley and Dr. C. Richard Terman under whose guidance this investigation was conducted. Their dedication, motivation and steadfast support was inexhaustable. The author also wishes to thank Dr, Robert E. L. Black for serving as a committee member, and for his critical reading of the manuscript. Special thanks must also be given to Mr. Glen Bean for his interest and skillful construction of technical apparatus used through­ out the project, and to Miss Libby Frazier, Miss Linda Teague, Mrs. Jewel Thomas, Mrs. Patricia Kipps and Mrs. Pamela Van Arsdale for their invaluable technical assistance.

iii TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...... iii

LIST OF TABLES...... V LIST OF FIGURES...... vi ABSTRACT...... vii INTRODUCTION...... 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS...... 5 RESULTS...... 14 DISCUSSION...... 30 LIST OF APPENDICES...... 39 BIBLIOGRAPHY...... 45 VITA...... 49

iv LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1. Comparison of plasma progesterone (ng/ml) in the estrus cycle of control deermice...... 15 2. Body weights (g) , ovary weights (mg) and plasma progesterone levels (ng/ml) in population and control female deermice...... 19 3. Plasma progesterone (ng/ml) of nulliparous population and selected stages of estrus of control deermice...... 23 4. Ovarian histology of control and nulliparous population females...... 25

v LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1. Standard curve for progesterone obtained by competitive protein binding assay...... 12 2. Mean plasma progesterone concentrations (ng/ml) for control deermice in each stage of the estrus cycle...... 17 3. Mean body weights (g) , ovary weights (mg) and plasma progesterone concentrations (ng/ml) of control and nulliparous population deermice...... 21 4. Control deermouse ovary showing follicles (F) and corpora lutea (CL)...... 2 7 5. Control deermouse ovary showing mature follicle (F) , corpora lutea (CL) and atretic follicles (AF) .. 2 7 6. Ovary from nulliparous population deermouse showing a follicle (F) , corpora lutea (CL) and atretic follicles (AF)...... 29 7. Ovary frcm nulliparous population deermouse showing a mature follicle (F) and large numbers of atretic follicles (AF)...... 29 8. Frequency distribution of plasma progesterone concentrations of control and nulliparous population deermice...... 25

vi ABSTRACT

B o d y weights, ovary weights, plasma progesterone con­ centrations and ovarian histology were studied in repro- ductively inhibited females from asymptotic laboratory populations and throughout the estrus cycle of control nulliparous prairie deermice. Progesterone was measured by a competitive protein binding technique. Body and ovary weights of population animals were significantly lighter than those of controls. Plasma progesterone concentrations of the population females were not significantly different from those of the control females. The control females, however, were shown to undergo cyclic changes in plasma progesterone concentration that were related to their estrus cycle stage. Thus, -.the mean plasma progesterone concen­ tration for the nulliparous population females was signifi­ cantly above the proestrus value and below the metestrus value of control females, but was not significantly differ­ ent from values observed for estrus or diestrus in those controls. Control female ovaries showed significantly larger numbers of follicles and corpora lutea than nulli­ parous population females, however, nulliparous population females exhibited significantly more atretic follicles than controls. These data suggest that nulliparous popula­ tion females could be cycling with respect to their ovaries and plasma progesterone, and that progesterone could be in­ volved in the reproductive inhibition observed. However, more than one mechanism of progesterone inhibition is suggested, with the possibility that a non-progesterone mechanism may be involved.

vii PLASMA PRQGESTEIpNE CONCENTRATIONS AND OVARIAN HISTOLOGY

IN PRAIRIE DEERMICE (PERDMYSCUS MANICULATUS BAIRDII)

FROM EXPERIMENTAL LABORATORY POPULATIONS INTRODUCTION

Numerical studies of natural populations of deermice

(Peromyscus maniculatus) have shown that population out­ breaks of this species rarely occur (Christian, 1961;

Terman, 1965). The evidence available suggests that deer­

mice may be more sensitive to -dependent factors

limiting population increase, and may possess a more effi­ cient mechanism for controlling population growth than is

true of more violently fluctuating forms such as Lemmus,

Microtus and Mus (Terman, 196 6).

Studies of experimental laboratory populations of

prairie deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) have

demonstrated that population growth was controlled under

conditions in which excess food, water and harborage were

available. Cessation of growth occurred at widely differ­

ent levels in populations maintained under identical con­

ditions of the physical environment, and was achieved by

one of two means: either failure of young to survive or

cessation of reproduction (Terman, 1965, 1969, 1973). These

data suggest a density related feedback mechanism of popu­

lation control by curbing reproduction that might involve

the hypothalamic-hypophysial-gonadial axis (Christian, 1963;

Christian, 1964; Christian and Davis, 1964; Christian, Lloyd

2 3 and Davis, 1965; Terman, 1969).

Reproductive processes of female mammals depend on the cyclic secretion of hormones by the adenohypophysis and ovary. The rhythm of the hormonal secretion, however, is not intrinsic to the adenohypophysis or ovary, but is regu­ lated by specific central nervous system areas, especially the hypothalamus. The female reproductive cycle culminates in ovulation which is triggered by the release of ovulatory levels of luteining hormone (LH), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) from the adenohypophysis (Rothchild, 1960;

Flerko, 1966; Mahesh, 1971; Labhsetwar, 1972).

Follicle maturation is controlled in general by FSH, and ovulation and corpus luteum formation by LH (Diczfalusy,

1969). The formation and release of these gonadotropins are regulated by separate hypothalamic factors, FSH-releasing

factor (Igarashi and McCann, 1964; Folkers, 1973), and LH-

releasing factor (McCann, Taleisnik and Friedman, 1960) .

The secretion of these releasing factors is controlled by cues coming to the central nervous system from external

sources, and by internally circulating levels of hormones

(McCann and Dhariwal, 1966). Following the identification of progesterone as the

corpus luteum hormone (Allen and Meyer, 19 33; Allen and

Wintersteiner, 1934), it was found that purified proges­

terone possessed ovulation suppressing properties (Dempsey,

19 37; Makepeace, Weinstein and Friedman, 1936; Selye, Browne and Collip, 1936; Phillips, 1937). Progesterone alone has relatively little effect on FSH, but it does suppress the pre-ovulatory surge of LH, whereas the combined administra­ tion of estrogen and progesterone in large enough doses depresses circulating levels of both FSH and LH (Diczfalusy,

1969).

Plasma progesterone concentrations have been reported

in a variety of mammals including the goat (Thornburn and

Schneider, 1972), sheep (Thornburn, Bassett and Smith, 1969)

the pig (Guthrie, Hendricks and Handlin, 1972), mare (Plotka

Witherspoon and Foley, 1972), dog (Christie, Bell, Horth and

Palmer, 1971), guinea pig (Feder, Resko and Goy, 1968),

hamster (Shaika, 1971), rat (Feder, Goy and Resko, 1967) and

human (Johansson, 1969). However, little data have been

published on plasma progesterone concentrations in mice.

The purpose of these experiments was to examine plasma

progesterone concentrations and ovarian histology in normal­

ly cycling female deermice and in experimental population

nulliparous deermice to determine if progesterone is a

central factor in, or correlated with a neuroendocrine mechanism producing inhibition of reproduction in laboratory

populations of prairie deermice. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Population Animals

Experimental populations were founded by four pairs of prairie deermice from eight different litters (60-100 days of age) (Clark, 1938) with the female of each pair being pregnant. The first litter of each pregnant female was killed at 21 days after birth. The second, and successive litters, (fertilized in the population) remained as part of that population. Six of the ten populations used in this study had reached population asymptote (Terman, 1965), and had not had young born into the population for a minimum of

117 days. The four remaining populations had not reached asymptote when sacrificed, however, they included nulliparous daughters so that correlations could be made with asymptotic populations. The range in age at death of experimental nulliparous population females was 94 to 486 days.

Control Animals Adult female deermice were paired with non-sibling males of the same age (60 day minimum) in no-contact cages which allowed reception of visual, olfactory and auditory cues from the male, but prevented contact by means of a partition made of two layers of hardware cloth separated by

3/4 inch. Two groups of control females were used in the

5 6 study- Group I consisted of 35 females in which the phase of the estrus cycle was determined by daily vaginal lavage, and 50 females that were never examined by vaginal lavage.

Group II consisted of 50 females, all of which were examined for stage of the estrus cycle by vaginal lavage. All control females were housed in the no-contact cages with males for a minimum of 21 days before vaginal lavage was begun. The range of ages at death of group I controls was 130-338 days, and for group II controls was 10 8-135 days. All control females had been paired for at least 35 days before sacri­ ficing.

Both experimental and control animals were maintained under artificial lighting, programmed for approximately 12 hours of bright light (four 40 watt flourescent tubes, 0 730 to 1930), and 12 hours of dim light (four 15 watt incandescent bulbs). Room temperatures were kept within a range of 216-

30°C. Food and water were supplied ad libitum.

Blood and Organ Collection Animals were rapidly anesthetized with minimal inhalation. Blood was obtained in the early afternoon from control and experimental population females by venipuncture of the ascending vena cava at the level of the renal vein using a heparinized syringe. The total time for collection of a blood sample never exceeded 2 minutes. The samples were immediately centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes.

The plasma was drawn off, and frozen at -20°C until assayed.

The whole animal was then placed in 10% formalin. Later, 7 ovaries were removed from the carcasses, cleaned of fat,

lightly blotted and weighed as paired organs to the nearest .01 milligram.

Materials 3 1 a, 2 a-H -Progesterone (Amersham/Searle) with specific

activity of 53 Ci/m mole was evaporated to dryness and di­

luted to a concentration of 50 yCi/ml with absolute .

Non-radioactive progesterone (Schwarz/Mann) was dissolved to a concentration of 100 ug/ml with absolute ethanol. From this stock, working concentrations of 100 ng/ml and 10 ng/ml were prepared every two weeks using absolute ethanol. All

steroids were checked for purity by thin layer chroma­

tography .

Precoated thin-layer plates (Silica Gel 60 F-254, E. M.

Laboratories, Inc.) were used. Prior to use all plates were washed by ascending chromatography with twice and

then once with absolute diethyl ether.

Florisil, 60-100 mesh, (Matheson, Coleman and Bell) was

used as obtained, and stored at 80°C until use.

Petroleum ether (anhydrous, b.p. 30-60°C), ethyl ether

(anhydrous), absolute methanol, glycol and 1,4-

dioxane were obtained from J. T. Baker Chemical Company.

Ethyl ether and petroleum ether (38°-45° fraction) were

re-distilled in glass prior to use. Methanol was spectro- photometric quality, and not further purified. Ethylene

glycol and 1,4-dioxane were liquid scintillation counting

grade and used as obtained. (Mallenckrodt Chemical 8

Works) was re-distilled in glass at 80°C prior to use. Abso­

lute ethyl , (USP, U.S. Industrial Chemical Co.) was used as obtained. All were stored at room temper­

ature. Liquid scintillation grade PPO and POPOP were ob­ tained from Sigma Chemical Co., and stored at -20°C until used.

Binding protein plasma was obtained by cardiac-puncture

from pregnant albino guinea pigs in the latter part of

gestation, and stored in 0.1 ml aliquots at -20°C.

G1assware

All glassware was soaked for 2 4 hours in concentrated

^SO^-Potassium dichromate, washed in hot soapy water, rinsed

in double distilled water five times and dried at 100°C prior •

to use.

Extraction and Isolation

The method employed in this study is a modification of

the methods of Strott and Lipsitt (1967), Tullner and Hopper

(1971) and Attal and Engels (1971). Approximately 2000 dpm of la, 2a-H^-Progesterone was added to 15 ml conical

centrifuge tubes and evaporated to dryness with air at room

temperature to serve as recovery estimations. Two hundred

yl of mouse plasma was then added to each tube. Samples were extracted twice with 5 volumes of petroleum ether for

1 minute on a vortex mixer. The petroleum ether layer was

drawn off using pre-washed disposable Pasteur pipets, placed

in clean conical centrifuge tubes and evaporated to dryness. 9

The dried residues were dissolved in methanol:ether (1:1)

and spotted on thin layer plates. The plates were developed in ether:benzene (2:1) by ascending chromatography. Non­

radioactive progesterone was used as a marker on each plate.

After development, the progesterone marker spots were lo­

cated with a short wavelength ultraviolet lamp, and an area of each sample lane corresponding to a distance of 1 cm.

above and below the center of the marker spot (total area= O 4cm^) was scrapped off. The loosened silica gel was sucked

into a disposable Pasteur pipet which had been tightly

plugged with a small wad of glass wool (previously washed with 3 ml ethyl ether). The samples were eluted with 3.0 ml

ethyl ether into 10x75 mm culture tubes and evaporated to

dryness. Samples and a silica gel blank were taken up in

1.0 ml absolute ethyl alcohol and 200 ul was transferred to

counting vials for recovery estimations. The remainder was

evaporated to dryness under air for the binding assay.

Competitive Protein Binding Assay

The binding assay was performed in a walk-in cold room

maintained at 3°C. One microcurie of la, 2a -H^-Progesterone

(4.72 x 10”^m mole) in ethanol was evaporated to dryness

and dissolved in 30.0 ml of 0.04 M. phosphate buffer (pH.

7.4). Fifteen microliters of guinea pig plasma were added

and mixed gently for 1 hour at room temperature. One milli­

liter of this binding solution was added to all assay tubes.

The tubes were placed vertically in a horizontal shaker and incubated for 1.0 hour at a speed of 230 shakes per minute. 10

At the end of the incubation period 4 mg of Florisil was

added to each tube using a calibrated spoon. The tubes were shaken for an additional 30 minutes. Five hundred Pi

of the supernatant was transferred to counting vials and

10.0 ml of Bray's solution was added. The vials were counted

for 20 minutes in a Nuclear Chicago Series 724 Liquid

Scintillation Counter.

A standard curve was constructed by plotting duplicates of standard progesterone of zero, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0 ng.,

versus the dpm of progesterone bound to protein. Nanograms

of samples were interpolated directly from the curve. (Fig­

ure 1)

Specificity

When progesterone determinations were made on plasma

from three normal male deermice, the mean concentration

observed was 0.1 + 0.1 (SEM) ng/ml plasma.

Blanks

Methanol:ether (1:1) with no progesterone was spotted

on one lane of a TLC plate and designated as blank. After

development, an area of this lane equal in area and adjacent

to the standard lanes was scrapped, eluted, recovery esti­

mated and subjected to the binding assay. Displacement of

bound H^-Progesterone of these blanks was equal to that of

the standard curve zero ng value.

Histology

Ovaries from control deermice in selected stages of 11

Legend for Figure 1

Standard curve for progesterone obtained by comoetitive protein binding assay. Each point on the curve represents the mean of dunlicate determinations. Radioactivity (dpm * 10 ) 20 18 22 24 16 12 14 iue 1 Figure rg»«oe (ng) Proge»»«fone lO 13 12 13 estrus, and experimental population nulliparous females were embedded in parafin, serially sectioned at 10 microns and stained with hematoxalin and eosin. Total numbers of follicles of type 5a, or larger, (Petersen and Peters, 196 8), and corpora lutea were counted for both ovaries of individ­ ual deermice. Follicles were classified as atretic if ovoid or irregular in shape, and filled with a non-cellu- lar matrix. The number of atretic follicles in the middle most section of the middle and the middle + or - one row were counted and the mean number per section for paired ovaries from individual deermice being recorded. All ovarian elements were counted under 80x magnification.

Statistical Analysis

Comparisons of body weights, ovary weights and plasma progesterone concentrations were made using the means of the experimental populations because the individuals within each experimental population are not statistically indepen­ dent. The data were subjected to linear correlation co­ efficient analysis and Student's t Distribution. When significant differences (<.05) between the mean squares occurred, Cochran's approximation was used (Snedecor, 1956).

The 5% level of probability was regarded as significant in all cases. RESULTS

The Control Female Deermouse Estrus Cycle(Table 1, Figure 2)

The length of the estrus cycle in control females was calculated in 42 animals that had been followed through a minimum of two full cycles. The range of length of the deermouse cycle was observed to be three to seven days, with a mean of 4.7 + 0.15 (SEM) days.

Cyclic variations in plasma progesterone concentrations were observed in group I control females. However, the num­ ber of animals in specific phases of the estrus cycle were low. The group II controls were assembled to increase the number of control mice and to obtain more information on cyclic variations of progesterone observed in the group I controls. The group II control females likewise exhibited variations in progesterone concentrations with different stages of the estrus cycle. The progesterone concentrations for group I and II controls were then statistically compared for each stage of the estrus cycle. No significant differ­ ences between groups were observed (Appendix A) , and the data from the two control groups were, therefore, pooled by stage of the estrus cycle.

Significant differences in plasma progesterone con­ centrations were observed between all stages of the estrus

14 Comparison of Plasma Progesterone Concentrations (ng/ml) -H -P M-l 43 I—I w o a p u p -P o u 0 (U 0 p p o p e C p 0 o 0 o 0 c 0 -H -H *H p i— i—1 rH P rQ P o P ■a cu fd P o p p 6 >1 O O P IQ Cd p CP CD p o 0 fij CO p o e O 0 CD a CD c fd O o p CO P as • • rd a a 1 a -H P O H p 53 w us p P p P Q w s p +1 CO Oo o o CO e P CO CO p CO P C (d p CD CP p D i—1 ID O CO CD C P CD p 0 CD s 0 0 fd £ a a 1—1 1—1 p p O O o cx> t"- i p O o o o o o i— i r-" CM o 04 P — +1 CO 0 CO p o p P P V V V V V V V V V » • • • • * . • • • * 1 P LD 1— ) p P VO VO 1 o o o w + 1 p — p co p CO • • • 1 CM 1 MCM CM 1 M vo O ID VO o ID rH s p p -H —1 CO CO 0 £ 0 V V 0 V * « • • • « • •H CM Mo CM CM o 1 o 1 Q p +1 — — 0 0 p p V V . • . 1 1 cn P MO CM P H P O +t ID CM 0 e P p cd 0. 0 0 V • ♦ VO rH CM CT\ VO 03 P P +1 0 P £ O' CD g a • 15 16

Legend for Figure 2

The mean plasma progesterone concentrations for control deermice in each stage of the estrus cvcle. Each bar represents the mean of 15-22 observations, with the verticle lines indicating the standard error of the mean. Figure 18 cycle. A 103% increase (P<.01) in the mean progesterone concentration was observed from proestrus to estrus, and a

177% increase (P<.01) in mean progesterone concentration occurred from estrus to metestrus. However, mean pro­ gesterone concentrations decreased (P<.1) by 52% from metestrus to diestrus. Figure 2 illustrates the mean plasma progesterone concentrations for control deermice in specific stages of the estrus cycle.

Four control females failed to become vaginally perfo­ rate. The mean progesterone concentration of these imper­ forate females was significantly lower than those levels noted for all stages of the estrus cycle (Table 1).

Plasma progesterone concentrations were also obtained from six deermice in the latter stage of pregnancy. The mean progesterone concentration in these females was signif­ icantly larger than for any stage of the estrus cycle of control females (Table 1).

Comparisons of Control and Population Females

Body Weights (Table 2, Figure 3) Nulliparous deermice from experimental populations showed significantly lower (P<.001) mean body weights than control females. Moreover, mean body weights of founding females, and of all females excluding founders were signif­ icantly smaller than those of control females.

Ovary Weights (Table 2, Figure 3)

No significant differences were observed between the Body Weights (g), Ovary Weights (mg), and Plasma Progesterone (ng/ml) in Population and Control Deermice •iH i—i (it +J .5- -P fd 8 tn CD CO 8 G CD -j U] .. • • • • » • — , 1 H i— 1 —, i— '— ■" i— i NO CN rH i— 1 CO rH o rH rH CN rH i— 1 H* * * r— i— 1 i— 1 rH h r- oo O H* cn i— 1 iH o LO O O CN h - g * ft • • « • 1 1 H CL)■H Td T5 i—iG W G G H G G G n co tn OCO CO X X C o o „— » —1'— (— 1 1 1 * ■— r ■ -— ■K * * CO ,— ' — rH cn ■K cn iH * 1— 1 . o CO rH o £~" CO CO OCN CO CO ["•> cn O LO o CN 00 o LO LO Oin LO N—■' I — OCO LO H+1 -H — -H -H , — m * • • ft * • • • „ .

•H* [K r—I n to cn O O rH i S 0) G —i i— i— i -»e * LO , 1— „— * ID r * * s CO LO * cn H* I— 1 'si* LO o\ CT\ o 00 (N cn rH cn LO co CO r- O — +1 +1 _■* ft ■ • 1

. 19 20

Legend for Figure 3

The mean body weights (g) , ovary weights (mg) and plasma pro­ gesterone concentrations (ng/ml) of control and nulliparous population deermice. Each control bar represents the mean of 90 determinations of individual deermice, and each population bar represents the average of 9 population means. The vertical lines indicate the standard error of the mean. Figure o r o o U 6u 3 S*3od DlUSOJd *536oJd JS O 3U u) 6 (\ |UI o tJK ( 6 ) * (Bui) " «>yt »" jrn ^ ^ (i|6|3jv\ (i|6|3jv\ h 6|3 ; «»/■ y; m ^ROfl o o X q a o j o ; - v?» ;- v?» /*, '-»■ □ a. o a 3 21 22 mean ovary weights of control females and population

founding females. However, the mean ovary weights of popu­

lation nulliparous females were smaller (P<.001) than those of control females.

When ovary weights were compared with plasma proges­

terone concentrations in control females, no significant

correlation was demonstrated. However, population nul­

liparous females did show a significant positive correlation

(P<.01) between progesterone and ovary weights (Appendix B).

Plasma Progesterone (Table 2, Figure 3)

No significant differences in the mean progesterone concentrations were observed between group I control females

and any category of population females. It should also be noted that when group I females were combined with group II

and compared with population females with respect to proges­ terone concentrations, again no significant differences were

found (Appendix C).

Table 3 presents comparisons of plasma progesterone

concentrations in population nulliparous females and control

females in specific stages of the estrus cycle. Control

mice had significantly lower (P <. 05) mean concentrations of

progesterone in proestrus, and significantly higher (P<.025) mean concentrations in metestrus as compared with population

females. Mean progesterone concentrations were not signif­ icantly different between population females and control

females in estrus or diestrus. Plasma Progesterone (ng/ml) of Nulliparous Population and Selected Stages of Estrus of Control Deermice -H CO S a f S -H O G 0 05 O G rd fa rd P 01 6 0 fa H P -H i—1 -H fa2 rd P O01 O O fa >“• i—G I G 0 ^ G r—1 co CFi oo ro in CO rH fa H+1 + ~H e o 0) rtf 0 P I—i 00 o fa CM r- o LO 01 P G G V P P 01 P 0 01 0 • •

i— LO i—1 OLO VO s W P -H 01 G G P 0 0 • » i vo O CM CM CM LO o P P -H V 0 w 0 • • • M C M C CM vo ■H - r CM P 1-H 1 + Q g P 0 101 01 G 0 0 ♦ 0 • ■ rH 1 - 4 CM co P hH O S o P O P fd G fa . • • •H -H 1 - 4 4-1 n M H r % P! P P 2 p P 0 0 p 0 0 G dP rd U P G G P p O G O o o 0 P 0 0 fa fa 0 (d G 0 0 • -H •H ■H H i - i 1 - 4 i i - 4 3 T T5 P P p P — 2 — G fa rd O 0 0 G 0 rd P O G > G 0 O 0 0 0 0 rd 0 P P 0 0 G G £ G o • 1 1 23 24

Ovarian Histology (Table 4; Figures 4, 5, 6 and 7)

Population nulliparous females had significantly fewer follicles (P<.001), and corpora lutea (P <. 001) than controls. However, they averaged significantly more (P<.05) atretic follicles than control females. No correlation could be demonstrated between progesterone concentrations and numbers of follicles, corpora lutea or atretic follicles in control females or in population nulliparous females

(Appendix D). Ovarian Histology of Control and Nulliparous Females co CN "H -H ■H s I—I I s a +J 3 § O 03 co Pi rd rd

* -K ■fc * m O * CN CN CN 'sr cn o co oo IT) CN O'! CO 00 CN o un 3 0 -H 44 -H S S PP $*$ co r$*-$ • ■ rd

■H -H ■H S ‘d ° -S CO -H •rJ > cu T30) rH CN CO CN rH 3 U 03 U CP,® p P-.-H D > CD co Tj ro m m -P-M C PI o O id Q Q

O

*Q m - 4

25 26

Legend for Figure 4

Control deermouse ovary showing follicles (F) and corpora lutea (CL). X 64.

Legend for Figure 5

Control deermouse ovary shelving mature follicle (F) . Corpora

lutea (CL) and atretic follicles (AF). X 512. WwSSi

COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MftftY 28

Legend for Figure 6

Ovary frcm nulliparous population deermouse showing follicles (F) r corpora lutea (CL) and atretic follicles (AF). X 64.

Legend for Figure 7

Ovary from nulliparous population deermouse showing a mature follicle (F) and large numbers of atretic follicles (AF) . X 320. 6

$jgp.g6E OF WILLIAM & MARX

WILLIAM & MftRY DISCUSSION

The data presented in this study have shown that circulating plasma progesterone concentrations in control female prairie deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) fluctuate in a pattern similar to other spontaneously ovulating mammals. These fluctuations are, furthermore, reflected by cyclic changes in the vaginal epithelium during the estrus cycle. These data suggest that deermice exhibit a typical mammalian spontaneous biphasic ovarian cycle. It was observed that mean plasma progesterone con­ centrations increased from proestrus to estrus, (as ex­ pected in an ovarian follicular phase), reached their highest levels at metestrus, and then declined in diestrus,

(as would be observed in an ovarian luteal phase) (Figure 2). However, the maximum concentrations of progesterone observed in the deermouse at metestrus were higher than the majority of mammals previously reported; i.e., twice as much as that observed in the dog (Christie, Bell, Horth and Palmer, 19 71), three times that observed in the human female (Johansson,

1969), and approximately ten times that reported for the goat (Thornburn and Schneider, 1972) and mare (Plotka,

Witherspoon and Foley, 1972). Mean progesterone concentra­ tions in the deermouse most closely compared with those re-

30 ported for the golden hamster (Lukaszewska and Greenwald,

1969), perhaps reflecting the fact that both mammals are in the same subfamily, Cricetinae.

Four of the control females were vaginally imperforate, a condition suggested to indicate reproductive immaturity.

The mean progesterone concentrations measured in these fe­ males were approximately one half of the observed control proestrus values. Speculation about the physiological or endocrine condition of these imperforate control females must await further investigation.

Figure 3 illustrates the mean values for body weight and ovary weight of control and population nulliparous females. The fact that population females had significantly smaller mean body and ovary weights than control females suggests a possible inhibition of both total body develop­ ment and reproductive maturation.

We found a significantly positive correlation (P .01) between ovary weights and plasma progesterone concentrations in only the nulliparous population females (Appendix B) .

It has been established that progesterone concentrations can be correlated with numbers of corpora lutea in sheep

(Thornburn, Bassett and Smith, 1969). However, when ovarian elements, i.e. follicles, corpora lutea and atretic follicles were counted and compared with progesterone concentrations in control and nulliparous population deermice, no significant differences were found. Corpora lutea and follicles were ob­ served in all control females. However, certain population nul 32

liparous females showed no corpora lutea but exhibited high progesterone concentrations. In these cases it is suggested

that progesterone is being secreted from other sources.

Evidence has recently been presented that progesterone can be secreted by the adrenal cortex and uterus (Kind, 1971), and by the stroma or interstitium of the ovary (Lukaszewska

and Greenwald, 1969) . Further investigations into the nature

of the secretory products of the atretic follicles, that are

so characteristic of the inhibited animals, and the ovarian

stroma may prove to be important in understanding the in­

hibited state. For example, if an aberrant ovary were pro­

ducing excessive amounts of estrogen, there would be an

antagonism of the proper endometrial development which could

prevent implantation. We have not demonstrated any simple mechanism of in­

hibition involving the chronically high level of proges­

terone that could operate by inhibiting the secretion of LH

and thereby inhibit ovulation. It does, however, remain

possible that some of the population animals are inhibited

by just such a mechanism. Also, it is not necessary to

assume that only high levels of progesterone could effect

inhibition. For example, new evidence has been accumulated

which suggests that progesterone can exert both facilitatory

and inhibitory effects on mating behavior and time of

ovulation in the rat (Stevens, Spies, Hilliard and Sawyer,

1970), and in the golden hamster (Lisk, 1969; Reuter,

Ciaccio and Lisk, 1970). 33

It may also be that the animals are inhibited only by

degree and that all of the elements of reproductive poten­

tial are present and they are simply operating at subnormal

levels or out of phase with respect to each other. Further, we must allow for the distinct possibility that other neuro­ endocrine mechanisms may be involved. A recent report by

Hixon and Armstrong (19 71) demonstrated that in the rat there

is an inhibition of gonadotropin-induced ovulation by pro­ lactin.

The variation observed in the plasma progesterone con­

centrations among nulliparous population females could be explained by at least two very different processes. The

first of these is that most of the inhibited females would have shown a cyclic variation in plasma progesterone concen­

tration if several plasma samples could have been taken from

them at various times. In support of this idea is the fact

that the range of progesterone concentrations overlap al­

most exactly between population nulliparous and control fe­

males and that 90% of the females of both groups exhibited

less than 45 ng of progesterone per ml of plasma, with the

largest number of females in both groups having plasma con­

centrations between 5 and 15 ng/ml (Figure 8). Also, all of

the stages of follicular development were observed among

the various inhibited females, even though the mean ovarian

weight of nulliparous animals was smaller than the control

value. Moreover, 77% of the ovaries of nulliparous popula­

tion females contained corpora lutea. If it is assumed 34

Legend for Figure 8

The frecruency distribution of plasma progesterone concentrations of control and nulliparous population deermice. Figure u f|outfuy f|outfuy jo jaqiur>N 35 36 that the presence of corpora lutea is evidence of ovula­ tion, then it is likely that FSH and LH were also being released in sufficient amounts to produce that ovulation

(Bingle 1969a, 1969b; Labhsetwar, 1972). Thus, these data could be interpreted to suggest that with respect to FSH and LH release, follicular maturation, and ovulation there may not be a total inhibition or turning off of reproductive function in nulliparous females.

A second alternative explanation of these data that cannot be ruled out with the evidence at hand is that the variance observed in ovarian histology and plasma proges­ terone concentration is not a result of cyclic changes with­ in individual animals, but rather that the animals are in different states of arrested reproductive function. Thus, it could be that the presence of corpora lutea in nulliparous population animals does not indicate ovulation within the previous four days but could be the result of either ovula­ tion occurring many weeks earlier or of the luteinization of unovulated follicles. Similarly, the progesterone values for individual animals could be chronically high, or low, rather than representing different points in a random sam­ ple of cycling animals. The additional observation that

87% of the nulliparous population animals were vaginally imperforate lends further support to the notion that, at least with respect to estrogen, these animals were not cycling. If this latter explanation is true then several states of inhibition may exist among nulliparous females 37 suggesting two or more stages of a single mechanism of inhibition or possibly more than a single mechanism at work. APPENDIX 39

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix Page

A. Comparison of estrus stages between Group I and Group I I ...... 40

B. Correlation of ovary weights with progesterone in population and control deermice...... ^1

C. Plasma progesterone concentrations (ng/ml) of experimental population and control female deermice (Group I and Group II)...... 42

D. Correlation of progesterone (ng/ml) with the number-.of follicles, corpora lutea and atretic follicles in control and nulliparous population deermice...... 40

* • • w cn rH 0 Oi • •• c £ V c M M

a, 3 o u o TJ c 0 £ O >~H ro l o co i—1 i—1 "H1 w • • # • « * • • H CO rH t— 1 CN CN in cn m c n

Q a + 1 +1 +1 -H +1 -H -H -H -H T-*«H o c U0 CO N 1 00 rH cn *3* CO u 0 • • • • » • • 9 o 0 t"~ VO co oo o cn s: i—1 i—i CN ^ CN CN c 0 0 £ <3 -P 0 HX PQ Q 0 S 0 W cn CU 0 -P Cl cn cn I-" 00 00 ^ r- in C/3 1— 1 i—i 0 3 M -P 0 W m 0

c o 0 M IH •H M M H H H C (H H 0 O 0 0 H 0 0 04 0 3 3 M M 0 0 0 0 6 -H H U 5-1 P 3 3 o 4J 4J 0 0 4_> 4J U U u 0 0 0 3 O 0 0 -P -P o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E o o -P -P -P -P 0 0 O P iH co 0 0 0 *H -H o PM Oi W w £ s a a 41

00 co 00 <—l r^~ ro in vo CN O'! o vo i W p d p4 cd o P4 > ■H O p rd 4-1 £ 2 O id Pn fd P rH P 2 i4 d ou o o o u u cu 42

p CO o PL. I

-p 0 i—i p cm o p . H 0 W rH rH 0 0 cm cn o> in ["• P 4-1 p S o cn cn oo 0J p o M • • •. •H 0 M m 04 O' ro > g O •H •r~J + 1 +i 4-1 -H 44 • 54 " 0 0 p 0 p P rH O ro P •H Cl! fd (d • • • • o X 0 o o cn •H 44 M M S 0 4 ro ro rH 44 O 0 44 CM i—1 0 o P P U o CM 0 ,-s 54 O o 1—1O CM g g —' P \ 44 P CJ t n O P 0 CM 00 r—1 X —' O in 00 in 0 0 M ■H Pi ro 54 44 Q 0 s 0 0 !3 P 54 0 < w (H 54 54 g 0 54 1- I 0 0 0 CM 44 P td g P CM f •§ i—1 O 0 0 P P CM U a CM S3 S 43

legend for Appendix D

Correlation (r) of plasma progesterone (ng/ml) with the number of follicles, corpora lutea and atretic follicles in control and nulliparous population deermice. APPENDIX D

Controls n r t P Progesterone with:

Follicles 20 0.078 0.335 n.s

Corpora Lutea 20 0.210 0.911 n.s

Atretic Follicles 20 0.144 0.617 n.s

Exp . I, Pop. 6A

Progesterone with:

Follicles 7 0.000 0.000 n.s

Corpora Lutea 7 0.564 1.529 n.s

Atretic Follicles 7 0.498 1.2 86 n.s

Exp. I , Pop. 1

Progesterone with:

Follicles 6 0.308 0.648 n.s

Corpora Lutea 6 0.743 2.220 <. 1

Atretic Follicles 6 0.184 0.348 n.s

Exp. II, Pop. 1

Progesterone with:

Follicles 10 0.048 0.136 n.s

Corpora Lutea 10 0.20 2 0.5 85 n.s

Atretic Follicles 10 0.544 1.833 n.s

Exp. II, Pop. 2

Progesterone with:

Follicles 7 0.245 0.669 n.s

Corpora Lutea 7 0.484 1.462 n.s

Atretic Follicles 6 0.46 8 1.059 n.s BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, W.M. , and R.K. Meyer. 1933. The qualitative separation of progestin from oestrin in extracts of the corpus luteum. Am. J. Physiol. 106: 55-63.

Allen, W.M. and O. Wintersteiner. 1934. Crystalline progestin. Science 30: 190-191.

Attal, J. and J.A. Engels. 1971. A simple technique for the assay of progesterone in pregnancy. J. Endocr. 50: 703-704.

Bingel, A.S., and N.B. Schwartz. 1969a. Pituitary LH content and reproductive tract changes during the mouse oestrus cycle. J. Reprod. Fert. 19: 215-222.

Bingel, A.S. and N.B. Schwartz. 1969b. Timing of LH release and ovulation in the cvclic mouse. J. Peprod. Fert. 19: 223-229.

Christian, J.J. 1961. Phenomena associated with population density. Proc. of Nat. Acad. Sci. 47: 428-449.

Christian, J.J. 1963. Endocrine adaptive mechanisms and the physio­ logic regulation of population growth. Pp. 189-353. In Physiological Mammology. (W.V. Mayer and R.G. Van Gelder, eds.), Academic Press, N.Y. l:xii+, 1-381.

Christian, J.J. 1964. Physiological and pathological correlates of population density. Proc. Royal Soc. Med. 57: 169-174.

Christian, J.J. and D.E. Davis. 1964. Endocrines, behavior and population. Science 146: 1550-1560.

Christian, J.J. , J.A. Lloyd and D.E. Davis. 1965. The role of endocrines in the self regulation of mammalian populations. Recent Prog. Hormone Res. 21: 501-578.

Christie, D.T'7., E.T. Bell, C.E. Horth and R.F. Palmer. 1971. Peri­ pheral plasma, progesterone levels during the canine oestrus cycle. Acta. Endocrinol. (kbh) 68: 543-550.

Clark, F.H. 1938. Age of sexual maturity in mice of the genus Peromyscus. J. Mammology 9: 230-234. Dempsey, F.W. 1937. Follicular growth rate and ovulation after various experimental procedures in the guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol. 120: 126-132. 45 46

Diczfalusy, E. 1969. Steps in the reproductive process susceptible to regulation. Pull, of W.H.O. 40: 479-491.

Feder, H.H., R.17. Goy and J.A. Resko. 1967. Progesterone concen­ trations in the peripheral plasma of cyclic rats. J. Physiol. 191: 136p~137p.

Feder, H.H., J.A. Resko and R.N. Goy. 1968. Progesterone concen­ trations in the arterial plasma of guinea o.igs during the oestrus cycle. J. Endocr. 40: 505-513.

Flerko, B. 1966. Control of gonadotropin secretion in the female. Pp. 613-668. In Neuroendocrinology, (L. Martini and W.F. Ganong, eds.) , Vol. 1, Academic Press, N.Y.

Folkers, K. 1973. Personal communicati.on.

Guthrie, H.D., D.M. Hendricks and D.L. Kandlin. 1972. Plasma estrogen, progesterone and III prior to estrus and during pregnancy in pigs. Endocrinology 91: 675-679.

Hixon, J.E. and D.T. Armstrong. 1971. Inhibition of gonadotropin- induced ovulation by prolactin. Endocrinology 89: 584-590. Igarashi, M. and S.M. McCann. 1964. A hypothalamic follicle stimu­ lating hormone. Endocrinology 74: 446-452.

Johansson, E.D.B. 1969. Progesterone levels in peripheral plasma during the luteal phase of the normal human menstrual cycle measured by a rapid competitive protein binding technique. Acta. Endocrinol. 61: 592-606. Kind, F.A. 1971. Chemistry and biochemistry of progesterone, pp. 13-64. In International Encyclopedia of Pharmacology and Therapeutics: Progesterone, Section 48, Volume 1, Pergamon Press, N.Y. Labhsetwar, A.P. 1972. Further evidence for svnergism between LH and FSH in the induction of ovulation in rats; lack of effects of prolactin. J. Reprod. Fert. 29: 435-438.

Lisk, R.D. 1969. Progesterone: Role in limitation of ovulation and sex behavior in mammals. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 31: 593- 601. Lukaszewska, J.H. and G.P. Greenwald. 1969. Progesterone levels in the cyclic and pregnant hamster. Endocrinology 86: 1-9.

Mahesh, V.B. 1971. Current concepts on the regulation of ovulation and corpora lutea function. J. Reprod.. Fert. 27: 297. 47

Makepeace, A.W., G.L. Weinstein and M.II. Friedman. 1936. Effect of progestin and progesterone on o w l at ion in the rabbit. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (N.Y.) 35: 269-270.

McCann, S.M. and A.P.S. Dhariwal. 1966. Hypothalamic releasing factors and the neurovascular link between the brain and anterior pituitary. Pp. 261-296. In Neuroendocrinology (L. Martini and W.F. Ganong, eds.) , Volume 1, Academic Press, N.Y.

McGann, S.M., wS. Taleisnik and H.M. Friedman. 1960. LH releasing activity in hvrothalamic extracts. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (N.Y.), 104: 432-434.

Peterson, T. and H. Peters. 1968. Proposal for a classification of cocytes and follicles in the mouse cvarv. J. Reprod. Fert. 17: 555-557.

Phillips, W.A. 1937. The inhibition of estrus cycles in the albino rat by progesterone. Am. J. Physiol. 119: 623-626.

Plotka, E.D., D.M. Witherspoon and C.W. Foley. 1972. Luteal function in the mare as reflected by progesterone concentrations in peripheral blood plasma. Am. J. Vet. Res. 33: 917-920. Reuter, L.A., L.A. Ciaccio and R.D. Lisk. 1970. Progesterone: Regulation of the estrus cycle, ovulation and estrus behavior in the golden hamster. Endocrinology 86: 1287-1297.

Rothchild, I. 1960. The corpus luteum -pituitary relationship: The association between the cause of luteotropin, secretion and the cause of follicular quiescence during lactation; the basis for a tentative theory of the corpus luteum - pituitary relationship in the rat. Endocrinology 67: 9-41.

Selve, K. , J.S.L. Browne and J.B. Collip. 1936. Effect of large doses of progesterone in the female rat. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (N.Y.), 34: 472. Shaika, A.A. 1971. Estrone, estradiol, progesterone and 17<*-OH progesterone in ovarian venous plasma during the estrus cycle of the hamster. Endocrinology 91: 1136-1140.

Snedecor, G.W. 1956. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. Stevens, K.R., H.G. Spies, J. Hilliard and C.H. Sawyer. 1970. Site(s) of action of progesterone in blocking ovulation in the rat. Endocrinology 86: 970-975. 48

Strott, C.A. and M.B. Lipsett. 1966. Measurement of 17-hydroxy- progesterone in human plasma. J. Clin. Endocr. 28: 1426-1430.

Thornburn, G.D. and W. Schneider. 1972. The progesterone concen­ tration in the plasma of the goat during the oestrus cycle and pregnancy. J. Endocr. 52: 23-36.

Thornburn, G.D. , J.M. Bassett and I.D. Smith. 1969. Progesterone concentration in the peripheral plasma of sheep during the oestrus cycle. J. Endocr. 45: 459-469.

Terman, C.R. 1965. A study of population grovdh and control exhibited in the laboratory by rrairie deermice. Ecology 46: 890-895.

Terman, C.R. 1966. Population fluctuations of Percovscus maniculatus and other small mammals as revealed by the North /merican Census of Small Mammals. Am. Midland Naturalist 76: 419- 426.

Terman, C.R. 1969. Weights of selected organs of deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) from asymptotic laboratory populations. J. Mammology 50: 311-320.

Terman, C.R. 1973. Reproductive inhibition in asymptotic popula­ tions of prairie deermice. Proc. Ill Inter. Sym. Ccmp. Reprod. Edinburgh. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 19: 455-461.

Tullner, W.W. and B. Hopper. 1970. Urinary estrone and olasma pro­ gesterone levels during the menstrual cycle of the Rhesus monkey. Endocrinology 86: 1225-1230. VITA

Barry Douglas Albertson

B o m on September 14, 1946, in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania.

Graduated from Bloomsburg Area Junior-Senior High School in June,

1964. Received a B. S. degree in Biology from Juniata College,

Huntingdon, Pennsylvania. Began graduate studies at the College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, in September, 1968.

Drafted by the U. S. Army September, 1969, serving on active duty until March, 1972. Returned to the College of William and Mary in June, 1972. Worked as a teaching assistant 1968 - 1969, and held a research fellowship 1972 - 1973. Currently a candidate for the degree of Master of Arts in Biology.