DOCSLIB.ORG

Zebra Chip Complex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zebra Chip Complex PHA | Contingency Plan – Zebra chip complex INDUSTRY BIOSECURITY PLAN FOR THE POTATO INDUSTRY Threat Specific Contingency Plan Zebra chip complex Specific components detailed in this plan: Psyllid vector – Bactericera cockerelli Pathogen - Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum (syn. Ca. L. psyllaurous) Plant Health Australia The contents of this contingency plan is current as of November 2011 1 PHA | Contingency Plan – Zebra chip complex Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts have been made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Further information For further information regarding this contingency plan, contact Plant Health Australia through the details below. Address: Suite 1, 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 Email: [email protected] Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au 2 PHA | Contingency Plan – Zebra chip complex 1 Purpose and background of this contingency plan ............................................................ 6 2 Australian potato industry ...................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Notification process for the reporting of suspect pests ..................................................... 7 3 Eradication or containment decision matrix ........................................................................ 8 4 Pest information/status – Zebra chip complex .................................................................... 9 4.1 Pest details ....................................................................................................................... 9 5 Pest information/status – Tomato-potato psyllid ............................................................... 10 5.1 Pest details ..................................................................................................................... 10 5.1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 10 5.1.2 Life cycle .................................................................................................................. 11 5.1.3 Dispersal .................................................................................................................. 12 5.2 Affected hosts of B. cockerelli......................................................................................... 12 5.2.1 Host range ................................................................................................................ 12 5.2.2 Current geographic distribution ................................................................................ 13 5.2.3 Symptoms ................................................................................................................ 13 5.3 Diagnostic information .................................................................................................... 15 5.4 Psyllid transmission ........................................................................................................ 16 6 Pest information/status – Zebra chip .................................................................................. 17 6.1 Pest details ..................................................................................................................... 17 6.1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 17 6.2 Affected hosts of Ca. Liberibacter solanacearum ........................................................... 23 6.2.1 Host range ................................................................................................................ 23 6.2.2 Current geographic distribution ................................................................................ 23 6.3 Diagnostic information .................................................................................................... 26 6.3.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 26 6.3.2 Sample selection ...................................................................................................... 26 7 Risk assessments for pathways and potential impacts .................................................... 27 7.1 Tomato-potato psyllid pathway ....................................................................................... 27 7.1.1 Entry potential .......................................................................................................... 28 7.1.2 Establishment potential ............................................................................................ 28 7.1.3 Spread potential ....................................................................................................... 28 7.1.4 Economic impact ...................................................................................................... 29 7.2 Other pathways ............................................................................................................... 29 7.2.1 Fresh fruit ................................................................................................................. 29 7.2.2 Potato tubers ............................................................................................................ 29 7.2.3 Nursery stock ........................................................................................................... 30 3 PHA | Contingency Plan – Zebra chip complex 7.2.4 Natural wind pathway (from New Zealand) .............................................................. 30 8 Pest management .................................................................................................................. 31 8.1 Response checklist ......................................................................................................... 31 8.2 Surveys and epidemiology studies ................................................................................. 31 8.2.1 Technical information for planning surveys .............................................................. 32 8.2.2 Surveys for early detection of an incursion in a nursery and outdoors .................... 32 8.2.3 Delimiting surveys in the event of an incursion ........................................................ 34 8.2.4 Collection and treatment of Tomato-potato psyllid samples .................................... 35 8.2.5 Epidemiological study .............................................................................................. 37 8.2.6 Models of spread potential ....................................................................................... 37 8.2.7 Pest Free Area guidelines ........................................................................................ 37 8.3 Availability of control methods ........................................................................................ 39 8.3.1 General procedures for control ................................................................................ 39 8.3.2 Pest free (clean) seedlings ....................................................................................... 40 8.3.3 Cultural practices...................................................................................................... 40 8.3.4 Weed management .................................................................................................. 40 8.3.5 Insect Pest Management (IPM) strategy .................................................................. 40 8.3.6 Chemical options ...................................................................................................... 41 9 Course of action .................................................................................................................... 49 9.1 Destruction strategy ........................................................................................................ 49 9.1.1 Destruction protocols ............................................................................................... 49 9.1.2 Decontamination protocols ....................................................................................... 49 9.1.3 Priorities ................................................................................................................... 50 9.1.4 Plants, by-products and waste processing .............................................................. 50 9.1.5 Disposal issues ........................................................................................................ 50 9.2 Containment strategies ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A High-Throughput System to Identify Inhibitors of Candidatus Liberibacter Asiaticus Transcription Regulators
    A high-throughput system to identify inhibitors of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus transcription regulators Melanie J. Barnetta, David E. Solow-Corderob, and Sharon R. Longa,1 aDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and bHigh-Throughput Bioscience Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Contributed by Sharon R. Long, July 17, 2019 (sent for review March 26, 2019; reviewed by Bonnie L. Bassler, Dean W. Gabriel, and Brian J. Staskawicz) Citrus greening disease, also known as huanglongbing (HLB), is much interest in identifying additional compounds that inhibit the most devastating disease of Citrus worldwide. This incurable CLas infection and growth (1, 6, 7). disease is caused primarily by the bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter CLas is a reduced-genome, α-proteobacterium (8, 9) that asiaticus and spread by feeding of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina cannot be cultured, precluding use of direct screens for antimi- Liberibacter Lib- citri. Ca. L. asiaticus cannot be cultured; its growth is restricted to crobial discovery. The only known commensal , eribacter crescens, can be cultured and is being developed as a citrus phloem and the psyllid insect. Management of infected trees Liberibacter includes use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which have disadvan- model system to study physiology and genetics, in- cluding response to antimicrobial treatments, but still lacks the tages. Recent work has sought to identify small molecules that inhibit α – C Ca. L. asiaticus transcription regulators, based on a premise that at tools of better studied -proteobacteria (10 18). Las is closely related to the beneficial nitrogen-fixing plant symbiont Sino- least some regulators control expression of genes necessary for viru- rhizobium meliloti (Sme), which has been used as a heterologous lence.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum’ Haplotypes by the Tomato Psyllid Bactericera Cockerelli Xiao‑Tian Tang1, Michael Longnecker2 & Cecilia Tamborindeguy1*
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Acquisition and transmission of two ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ haplotypes by the tomato psyllid Bactericera cockerelli Xiao‑Tian Tang1, Michael Longnecker2 & Cecilia Tamborindeguy1* ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (Lso) is a pathogen of solanaceous crops. Two haplotypes of Lso (LsoA and LsoB) are present in North America; both are transmitted by the tomato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc), in a circulative and propagative manner and cause damaging plant diseases (e.g. Zebra chip in potatoes). In this study, we investigated the acquisition and transmission of LsoA or LsoB by the tomato psyllid. We quantifed the titer of Lso haplotype A and B in adult psyllid guts after several acquisition access periods (AAPs). We also performed sequential inoculation of tomato plants by adult psyllids following a 7-day AAP and compared the transmission of each Lso haplotype. The results indicated that LsoB population increased faster in the psyllid gut than LsoA. Further, LsoB population plateaued after 12 days, while LsoA population increased slowly during the 16 day-period evaluated. Additionally, LsoB had a shorter latent period and higher transmission rate than LsoA following a 7 day-AAP: LsoB was frst transmitted by the adult psyllids between 17 and 21 days following the beginning of the AAP, while LsoA was frst transmitted between 21 and 25 days after the beginning of the AAP. Overall, our data suggest that the two Lso haplotypes have distinct acquisition and transmission rates. The information provided in this study will improve our understanding of the biology of Lso acquisition and transmission as well as its relationship with the tomato psyllid at the gut interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomato Metabolic Changes in Response to Tomato-Potato Psyllid (Bactericera Cockerelli) and Its Vectored Pathogen Candidatus Liberibacter Solanacearum
    plants Article Tomato Metabolic Changes in Response to Tomato-Potato Psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) and Its Vectored Pathogen Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum 1,2, 3, 1,2 Jisun H.J. Lee y, Henry O. Awika y, Guddadarangavvanahally K. Jayaprakasha , Carlos A. Avila 2,3,* , Kevin M. Crosby 1,2,* and Bhimanagouda S. Patil 1,2,* 1 Vegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Texas A&M University, 1500 Research Parkway, A120, College Station, TX 77845-2119, USA; [email protected] (J.H.L.); [email protected] (G.K.J.) 2 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 3 Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, 2415 E Hwy 83, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.A.A.); [email protected] (K.M.C.); [email protected] (B.S.P.) Author contributed equally to this work. y Received: 1 August 2020; Accepted: 3 September 2020; Published: 6 September 2020 Abstract: The bacterial pathogen ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (Lso) is transmitted by the tomato potato psyllid (TPP), Bactericera cockerelli, to solanaceous crops. In the present study, the changes in metabolic profiles of insect-susceptible (cv CastleMart) and resistant (RIL LA3952) tomato plants in response to TPP vectoring Lso or not, were examined after 48 h post infestation. Non-volatile and volatile metabolites were identified and quantified using headspace solid-phase microextraction equipped with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS) and ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC/ESI-HR-QTOFMS), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • ENDOCRINE CONTROL of VITELLOGENESIS in BACTERICERA COCKERELLI (HEMIPTERA: TRIOZIDAE), the VECTOR of 'ZEBRA CHIP' a Dissertat
    ENDOCRINE CONTROL OF VITELLOGENESIS IN BACTERICERA COCKERELLI (HEMIPTERA: TRIOZIDAE), THE VECTOR OF ‘ZEBRA CHIP’ A Dissertation by FREDDY ANIBAL IBANEZ-CARRASCO Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Cecilia Tamborindeguy Committee Members, Ginger Carney Patricia Pietrantonio Robert Coulson Head of Department, David Ragsdale August 2017 Major Subject: Entomology Copyright 2017 Freddy Ibanez-Carrasco ABSTRACT The potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc), is a phloem-feeding insect with preference for Solanaceae. This insect species transmits the pathogenic bacteria ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ (Lso) the causative agent of zebra chip, an important disease of commercial potatoes in several countries worldwide. The classification of psyllids among the most dangerous vectors has promoted their study, but still many biological processes need to be investigated. As a first step towards the elucidation of vitellogenesis in B. cockerelli, two candidate vitellogenin transcripts were identified and its expression was analyzed in different life stages. Our results showed that in virgin females, BcVg1-like expression increased up to 5 days old; while mating significantly upregulated its expression in 5- and 7-day-old females and also induced oviposition. BcVg6-like transcript was expressed at similar level between females and males and it was not up-regulated by mating. To elucidate the role of juvenile hormone in B. cockerelli Vgs expression, topical applications of juvenile hormone III (JH III) were performed on virgin females, resulting in an upregulation of BcVg1-like expression and an increase in the number of mature oocytes observed in female reproductive organs.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Candidatus Liberibacter' Species Associated with Solanaceous Plants
    A New ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ Species Associated with Solanaceous Plants Lia Liefting, Bevan Weir, Lisa Ward, Kerry Paice, Gerard Clover Plant Health and Environment Laboratory MAF Biosecurity New Zealand NEW ZEALAND. IT’S OUR PLACE TO PROTECT. The problem: Tomato ● A new disease observed in glasshouse tomato with following symptoms: – spiky chlorotic apical growth – general mottling of leaves – curling of midveins – stunting NEW ZEALAND. IT’S OUR PLACE TO PROTECT. The problem: Capsicum (pepper) ● Similar symptoms reported in glasshouse capsicum: – chlorotic or pale green leaves – sharp tapering of leaf apex (spiky appearance) – leaf cupping and shortened internodes – flower abortion NEW ZEALAND. IT’S OUR PLACE TO PROTECT. Determination of the aetiology ● Plants were tested for a range of pathogens: – pathogenic fungi and culturable bacteria – generic tests for viruses: • herbaceous indexing • transmission electron microscopy (leaf dip) • dsRNA purification – PCR tests for phytoplasmas, viruses & viroids ● All tests negative ● Tomato/potato psyllid observed in association with affected crops NEW ZEALAND. IT’S OUR PLACE TO PROTECT. Transmission electron microscopy ● TEM of thin sections of leaf tissue revealed presence of phloem-limited bacterium-like organisms (BLOs) NEW ZEALAND. IT’S OUR PLACE TO PROTECT. Identification of the BLO ● Range of specific 16S rRNA PCR primers used in different combinations with universal 16S rRNA primers (fD2/rP1) ● Fragments unique to BLO identified by comparing PCR profiles of healthy and symptomatic plants NEW ZEALAND. IT’S OUR PLACE TO PROTECT. Identification of the BLO ● A unique 1-kb fragment was amplified from symptomatic plants only Healthy Symptomatic 97% identical to 16S rRNA gene of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ NEW ZEALAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from One Fastidious Bacterium to Another: What Can We Learn About Liberibacter Species from Xylella Fastidiosa
    insects Review Lessons from One Fastidious Bacterium to Another: What Can We Learn about Liberibacter Species from Xylella fastidiosa Angela Kruse 1,2 , Laura A. Fleites 2,3 and Michelle Heck 1,2,3,* 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 2 Boyce Thomson Institute, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 3 Emerging Pests and Pathogens Research Unit, Robert W. Holley Center, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS), Ithaca, NY 14853, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-607-254-5262 Received: 30 July 2019; Accepted: 12 September 2019; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: Huanglongbing is causing economic devastation to the citrus industry in Florida, and threatens the industry everywhere the bacterial pathogens in the Candidatus Liberibacter genus and their insect vectors are found. Bacteria in the genus cannot be cultured and no durable strategy is available for growers to control plant infection or pathogen transmission. However, scientists and grape growers were once in a comparable situation after the emergence of Pierce’s disease, which is caused by Xylella fastidiosa and spread by its hemipteran insect vector. Proactive quarantine and vector control measures coupled with interdisciplinary data-driven science established control of this devastating disease and pushed the frontiers of knowledge in the plant pathology and vector biology fields. Our review highlights the successful strategies used to understand and control X. fastidiosa and their potential applicability to the liberibacters associated with citrus greening, with a focus on the interactions between bacterial pathogen and insect vector. By placing the study of Candidatus Liberibacter spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Biology of Some Australian Hemerobiidae
    Progress in World's Neuropterologv. Gepp J, H. Aspiick & H. H6hel ed., 265pp., DM, Gnu Comparative Biology of some Australian Hemerobiidae JSy T. R NEW (%toria) Abstract Aspects of the field ecology of the two common Hemerobiidae in southern Australia (Micromus tas- maniae WALKER,Drepanacra binocula (NEWMAN)) are compared from data from three years samp- ling near Melbourne. M. tmmaniae occurs in a range of habitats, is polyphagous and is found throughout much of the year. D.binocula is more closely associated with acacias, feeds particularly on Acacia Psylli- dae and is strictly seasonal. The developmental biology and aspects of feeding activity of these 'relative generalist' and 'relative specialist' species are compared in the laboratory at a range of temperatures and on two prey species with the aim of assessing their potential for biocontrol of Psyllidae. Introduction About 20 species of brown lacewings, Hemerobiidae, are known from Australia. Most of these are uncommon and represented by few individuals in collections, and only two can be considered common in south eastern Australia. One of these, Micromus tasmaniae WAL- KER, represents a widely distributed genus and is abundant on a range of vegetation types. The other, Drepanacra binocula (NEWMAN), represents a monotypic genus from Australia and New Zealand and is more particularly associated with native shrubs and trees - in Austra- lia, perhaps especially with acacias, These species are the only Hemerobiidae found on Acacia during a three year survey of arboreal insect predators on several Acacia species around Mel- bourne, Victoria, and some aspects of their life-histories and feeding biology are compared in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Evidence That Zebra Chip Potato Disease in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas Is Associated with Bactericera Cockerelli
    Subtropical Plant Science, 59:30-37.2007 . Further Evidence that Zebra Chip Potato Disease in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas is Associated with Bactericera cockerelli Joseph E. Munyaneza 1, John A. Goolsby 2, James M. Crosslin 3, and Jeffrey E. Upton 1 1USDA-ARS, Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Wapato, WA 98951 2USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, Beneficial Insects Research Unit, Weslaco, TX 78596 3USDA-ARS, Vegetable and Forage Crops Research Unit, Prosser, WA 99350 ABSTRACT Zebra chip (ZC) is an important and emerging potato disease that is causing millions of dollars in losses to both potato producers and processors in the southwestern United States, Texas in particular. This disease is characterized by symptoms that develop in fried chips from infected potato tubers and that consist of a striped pattern of necrosis in tuber cross-section. Zebra chip plant symptoms resemble those caused by potato purple top and psyllid yellows diseases. To increase the understanding of the role of the potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli Sulc) and phytoplasmas in the expression of ZC, controlled exposure and exclusion field experiments using cages were conducted in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, where the psyllid is common and abundant and the disease is very damaging. Also, potato tubers exhibiting ZC symptoms were tested for phytoplasmas by PCR. Results indicated that there was a strong association between the potato psyllid and ZC. Plants exposed to psyllids developed typical ZC symptoms in both raw tubers and fried chips. At harvest, potato plants exhibiting ZC symptoms in raw tubers averaged 79.2, 37.5, and 48.6% for uncaged plants, caged plants exposed to Texas field-collected psyllids, and caged plants exposed to laboratory-reared psyllids, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidatus Liberibacter Asiaticus’, the Causal Pathogen of Citrus Huanglongbing
    Plant Pathology (2006) Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01438.x DevelopmentBlackwell Publishing Ltd and application of molecular-based diagnosis for ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, the causal pathogen of citrus huanglongbing Z. Wang, Y. Yin*, H. Hu, Q. Yuan, G. Peng and Y. Xia Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation of Chongqing, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China Conventional PCR and two real-time PCR (RTi-PCR) methods were developed and compared using the primer pairs CQULA03F/CQULA03R and CQULA04F/CQULA04R, and TaqMan probe CQULAP1 designed from a species- specific sequence of the rplJ/rplL ribosomal protein gene, for diagnosis of citrus huanglongbing (HLB) disease in southern China. The specificity and sensitivity of the three protocols for detecting ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in total DNA extracts of midribs collected from infected citrus leaves with symptoms in Guangxi municipality, Jiangxi Province and Zhejiang Province, were tested. Sensitivities using extracted total DNA (measured as copy number, CN per µL of recom- binant plasmid solution) were 439·0 (1·30 × 105 CN µL−1), 4·39 (1·30 × 103 CN µL−1) and 0·44 fg µL−1 (1·30 × 102 CN µL−1) for conventional PCR, TaqMan and SYBR Green I (SGI) RTi-PCR, respectively. SGI RTi-PCR was the most sen- sitive, but its specificity needed to be confirmed by running a melt-curve assay. The TaqMan RTi-PCR assay was rapid and had the greatest specificity. Concerning the correlation of PCR detection results with the various HLB symptoms, uneven mottling of leaves had the highest positive rate (96·50%), indicating that leaf mottling was the most reliable − symptom for field surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Bactericera Cockerelli and Associated Insect Populations in Potatoes in South Auckland
    Tomato-potato psyllid 269 Monitoring Bactericera cockerelli and associated insect populations in potatoes in South Auckland G.P. Walker1, F.H. MacDonald1, N.J. Larsen1 and A.R. Wallace2 1he New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 92169 Auckland 1142, New Zealand 2he New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Bactericera cockerelli (the tomato-potato psyllid; TPP) and associated insects were monitored weekly in unsprayed potatoes at Pukekohe by using yellow sticky traps and sampling plants from late July 2009 until mid March 2010. TPP adult catches and egg and nymphal infestations were absent or low until mid December. Other exotic and native psyllid species dominated trap catches until TPP populations increased markedly in mid January and peaked at 120 adults per trap in late February, with egg numbers reaching 520 per plant a week later. TPP nymphs peaked at 260 per plant in early February. Micromus tasmaniae (brown lacewing) was common in spring and summer, but Melanostoma fasciatum (small hover fly) became the dominant predator, peaking at 162 eggs and 35 larvae per plant in mid January. Naturally occurring predators appear to be important biological control agents of aphids, small caterpillars and probably TPP on potatoes at Pukekohe. Keywords tomato-potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli, sticky traps, plant sampling, potatoes, Melanostoma fasciatum, Micromus tasmaniae. INTRODUCTION Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc) (Hemiptera: Triozidae), (Liefting et al. 2009). It has been associated with most commonly known in New Zealand as foliar symptoms similar to those of zebra chip but tomato-potato psyllid (TPP), is a new invasive the insect vector in potatoes is unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Bactericera Cockerelli
    EPPO Datasheet: Bactericera cockerelli Last updated: 2020-10-08 Bactericera cockerelli is a pest in itself (feeding damage), and it transmits ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ to solanaceous plants. IDENTITY Preferred name: Bactericera cockerelli Authority: (Šulc) Taxonomic position: Animalia: Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Insecta: Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Triozidae Other scientific names: Paratrioza cockerelli (Šulc), Trioza cockerelli Šulc Common names: potato psyllid, tomato psyllid view more common names online... EPPO Categorization: A1 list view more categorizations online... more photos... EU Categorization: A1 Quarantine pest (Annex II A) EPPO Code: PARZCO HOSTS Bactericera cockerelli is found primarily on plants within the family Solanaceae. It attacks, reproduces, and develops on a variety of cultivated and weedy plant species (Essig, 1917; Knowlton & Thomas, 1934; Pletsch, 1947; Jensen, 1954; Wallis, 1955), including crop plants such as potato (Solanum tuberosum), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), pepper (Capsicum annuum), eggplant (Solanum melongena), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), and non-crop species such as nightshade (Solanum spp.), groundcherry (Physalis spp.) and matrimony vine (Lycium spp.). Adults have been collected from plants in numerous families, including Pinaceae, Salicaceae, Polygonaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Brassicaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Amaranthaceae, Lamiaceae, Poaceae, Menthaceae and Convolvulaceae, but this is not an indication of the true host range of this psyllid (Pletsch, 1947; Wallis, 1955;
    [Show full text]