DOCSLIB.ORG

$62,810,000 Anaheim Public Financing Authority Revenue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, under existing law and assumingcompliance with the tax covenant describedherein, the interest receivedby the owners of the 1993Bonds is excluded from gross income for Federal income tax purposesand is not a specific preferenceitem for purposesof the Federal alternative minimum tax. In the further opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, the interest received by the owners of the 1993 Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of the State of California. See, however, "TAX EXEMPTION" herein for a descnption of other taxes on corporations. Credit Ratings: Moody's: Aaa Duff & Phelps: AAA Standard & Poor's: AAA (see "Credit Ratings" herein) $62,810,000 Anaheim Public Financing Authority Revenue Bonds, Second Series 1993 (City of Anaheim Electric Utility San Juan Unit 4 Project) Dated: July 1, 1993 Due: October 1, as shown herein The 1993 Bonds arebeing executed and delivered as fullyregistered bonds. The 1993 Bonds when initially executed and delivered will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as registered owner and nominee for the Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("OTC"), and will be available to ultimate purchasers in book-entry form only in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. Interest on the 1993 Bonds is payable semi-annually on April l and October l of each year, commencing October l, 1993. Payments of principal of and interest on the 1993 Bonds are to be made to purchasers by OTC through OTC Participants. Purchasers will not receive physical delivery of the 1993 Bonds purchased by them. See "DESCRIPTION OF THE 1993 BONDS-Book-Entry System." The 1993 Bonds are subject to optional and mandatory redemption prior to their stated maturities as described herein. The 1993 Bonds are secured by, among other things, Project Revenues, which consist of 1993 Purchase Payments to be made by the City under the Installment Purchase Agreement. The 1993 Purchase Payments and all other payments with respect to Qualified Obligations are payable from Surplus Revenues in the Qualified Obligations Account of the City's Electric System Surplus Revenue Fund, subject to application as provided in the Indenture and the Installment Purchase Agreement. The 1993 Purchase Payments will rank junior to the City's approximately $210,694,000 outstanding electric revenue bonds and any additional electric revenue bonds which may be issued in the future on a parity with such bonds. As Qualified Obligations of the City, the 1993 Purchase Payments will rank on a parity with all other Qualified Obligations of the City, including the purchase payments in connection with the outstanding Electric System Certificates of Participation (Public Utilities Building) and Electric System Certificates of Participation (Combustion Turbine Peaking Plant) and the purchase payments in connection with the Anaheim Public Financing Authority's Revenue Bonds, Series 1993 (City of Anaheim Electric Utility Projects). See "SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 1993 BONDS." THE OBLIGATION OF THE CITY TO MAKE 1993 PURCHASE PAYMENTS UNDER THE INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS PAYABLE SOLELY FROM SURPLUS REVENUES IN THE QUALIFIED OBLIGATIONS ACCOUNT UNLESS OTHERWISE PAID FROM OTHER SOURCES OF LEGALLY AVAILABLE FUNDS. THE 1993 BONDS SHALL NOT IN ANY WAY BE CONSTRUED TO BE A DEBT OF THE CITY. THE FINANCING AUTHORITY OR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, IN CONTRAVENTION OF ANY APPLICABLE CONSTITU­ TIONAL OR STATUTORY LIMITATION OR REQUIREMENT CONCERNING THE CREATION OF INDEBTEDNESS BY THE CITY, THE FINANCING AUTHORITY, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, NOR WILL ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT OR INDENTURE CONSTITUTE A PLEDGE OF GENERAL REVENUES, FUNDS OR MONEYS OF THE CITY OR THE FINANCING AUTHORITY OR AN OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OR THE FINANCING AUTHORITY FOR WHICH THE CITY OR THE FINANCING AUTHORITY IS OBLIGATED TO LEVY OR PLEDGE ANY FORM OF TAXATION OR FOR WHICH THE CITY OR THE FINANCING AUTHORITY HAS LEVIED OR PLEDGED ANY FORM OF TAXATION. Payment of the principal of and interest on the 1993 Bonds when due wilt be insured by an irrevocable municipal bond insurance policy more fully described herein to be issued simultaneously with the delivery of the 1993 Bonds by = Financial Guaranty lnsurdJlce FGIC. Company FCJC ii.1.1_.-.l[� �i 1n111\. tnI.Rlf"d Fllw1<·11UC,JIIOll'1� ln,unt11o:<t· Compt"'' a pm-lilt:•<'OlllfJllfl� not allili.aled1111� �•h { }'I. Gon'T1111i,:•n1�10 Maturity Schedule $5,090,000 Serial Bonds Price Price Due Principal Interest or Due Principal Interest or October I Amount Rate Yield October I Amount Rate Yield 1994 $540,000 4.500% 2.90% 2002 $250,000 4.800% 100% 1995 535,000 4.500 3.60 2003 215,000 4.900 100 1996 510,000 4.500 3.85 2004 175,000 5.000 100 1997 485,000 4.500 4.00 2005 140,000 5.100 100 1998 465,000 4.500 4.20 2006 200,000 5.200 100 1999 440,000 4.500 4.35 2007 170,000 5.250 5.30 2000 410,000 4.500 100 2008 145,000 5.375 5.40 2001 290,000 4.600 4.65 2009 120,000 5.400 5.50 $57,720,000 5.75% Tenn Bonds due October l, 2022@ 100.00% (Accrued interest from July 1, 1993 to be added) The 1993 Bonds are offered when, as and if delivered to and received by the Underwriter, subject to approval of legality by Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Los Angeles, California, and Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, a Professional Corporation, Orange, California, Co-Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the City and the Financing Authority by the City Attorney and Financing Authority Counsel. O'Brien Partners Inc. is serving as financial advisor to the City in connection with the issuance of the 1993 Bonds. It is expectedthat the 1993 Bonds will be available fordelivery through the facilities of the OTC book-entrysystem on or about August 11, 1993. July 28, 1993 ANAHEIM PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEMBERS OF THE FINANCING AUTHORITY - CITY COUNCIL Tom Daly, Chairman of the Financing Authority- Mayor Bob D. Simpson, Vice-Chairman of the Financing Authority - Mayor Pro Tempore Frank Feldhaus, Director of the Financing Authority - Councilman Irv Pickler, Director of the FinancingAuthority - Councilman Fred Hunter, Director of the Financing Authority- Councilman CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD Bob Kazarian, Chairman Richard J. McMillan, Member Joseph R. White, Member Maggie Carillo Mejia, Member S. Dale Stanton, Member Robert 0. Schmahl, Member Ward Wiseman, Member FINANCING AUTHORITY OFFICIALS AND CITY OFFICIALS James D. Ruth, City Manager David Morgan, Assistant City Manager Tom Wood, Deputy City Manager George P. Ferrone, City Finance Director and Financing Authority Financial Advisor Jack L. White, City Attorney and Financing Authority Counsel Leonora N. Sohl, City Clerk and Financing Authority Secretary Charlene Jung, City Treasurer and Financing Authority Treasurer CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 201 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Edward K. Aghjayan, General Manager Edward G. Alario, Assistant General Manager - Water Services Brian J. Brady, Assistant General Manager - Electric Services and Operations Michael A. Bell, Financial Services Manager Darrell L. Ament, Consumer Services Manager Stephen E. Albright, Electric Field and Systems Operations Manager Greg Broeking, Operations Analysis Manager Antoinette D. Christovale, Financial Planning Manager John J. Hills, Environmental Services Manager Renee H. Hoffman, Financial Requirements Manager David X. Kolk, Power Resources Manager Mariann S. Long, Efficiency Programs Manager Daniel R. McCann, Power Resources Manager Robert M. Mullen, Financial Accounting Manager Susan V. Stephens, Power Resources Manager Jafar T. Taghavi, Electrical Engineering Manager Steven H. Takahashi, Water Field and Operations Manager Felipe Tobilla, Information Services Manager Diem X. Vuong, Water Engineering Manager Bonnie A. Woodson, Customer Services Manager CO-BOND COUNSEL Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon Los Angeles, California Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, a Professional Corporation Orange, California FINANCIAL ADVISOR O'Brien Partners Inc. Los Angeles, California and New York, New York TRUSTEE The Bank of New York Trust Company of California Los Angeles, California No dealer, broker, salesman or other person has been authorized by the Anaheim Public Financing Authority, the City of Anaheim or the Public Utilities Department to give any information or to make any representationsother than as contained in this OfficialStatement, and if given or made such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Anaheim Public Financing Authority, the City of Anaheim or the Public Utilities Department. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of, the 1993 Bonds by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such offer, solicitation or sale. The information set forth herein has been furnished by the Anaheim Public Financing Authority, the City of Anaheim and the Public Utilities Department and includes information obtained from sources which are believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The information and expressions of opinion contained herein are subject to change without notice and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Anaheim Public Financing Authority, the City of Anaheim or the Public Utilities Department since the date hereof. IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING OF THE 1993 BONDS, THE UNDERWRITER MAY OVERALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF SUCH 1993 BONDS AT LEVELS ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHER­ WISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME.
Recommended publications
  • Fact Book 2004 Fact Book 2004

    Fact Book 2004 Fact Book 2004

    Fact Book 2004 Fact Book 2004 Table of Contents Welcome Letter 2 Management Executive Team 4 Board of Directors 4 Operations Media Networks Profile 6 Business 7 Key Dates 8 Fast Facts 10 Data 13 Studio Entertainment Profile 22 Business 22 Key Dates 23 Fast Facts 25 Data 27 Parks and Resorts Profile 34 Business 34 Key Dates 35 Fast Facts 40 Data 42 Consumer Products Profile 48 Business 48 Key Dates 49 Fast Facts 51 History 55 Financials Income Statements 73 Balance Sheets 76 Cash Flows 78 Quarterly Statements 2004 80 Quarterly Statements 2003 82 Financial Ratios 85 Stock Statistics 86 Reconciliations 87 1 Fact Book 2004 Welcome to The Walt Disney Company Fact Book 2004 The Walt Disney Company’s Fact Book 2004 profiles the company’s key business segments and performance, and highlights key events from throughout the company’s 81 year history. The Walt Disney Company strives to be one of the world’s leading producers and providers of quality entertainment and information. Our investment in new content and characters as well as building, nurturing and expanding our existing franchises, gives us an advantage to strengthen and reinforce the affinity that consumers have with our brands and characters across all of our business segments. By growing operating income, improving returns on capital and delivering strong cash flow, the company strives to provide long-term value to Disney’s shareholders. Disney enjoys competitive advantages that underpin all of our successes, both financial and creative. In the long run, we prosper from the inventiveness of our film, television, and other programming; our ability to connect with our audiences; the use of technological advances to enhance our products; the opportunity to delight people around the world with our toys, clothing and other consumer products; and the ability to surprise our Guests with magical experiences at the parks, cruise lines and resorts.
  • A Critique of Disney's EPCOT and Creating a Futuristic Curriculum

    A Critique of Disney's EPCOT and Creating a Futuristic Curriculum

    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2019 FUTURE WORLD(S): A Critique of Disney's EPCOT and Creating a Futuristic Curriculum Alan Bowers Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, and the Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons Recommended Citation Bowers, Alan, "FUTURE WORLD(S): A Critique of Disney's EPCOT and Creating a Futuristic Curriculum" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1921. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1921 This dissertation (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FUTURE WORLD(S): A Critique of Disney's EPCOT and Creating a Futuristic Curriculum by ALAN BOWERS (Under the Direction of Daniel Chapman) ABSTRACT In my dissertation inquiry, I explore the need for utopian based curriculum which was inspired by Walt Disney’s EPCOT Center. Theoretically building upon such works regarding utopian visons (Bregman, 2017, e.g., Claeys 2011;) and Disney studies (Garlen and Sandlin, 2016; Fjellman, 1992), this work combines historiography and speculative essays as its methodologies. In addition, this project explores how schools must do the hard work of working toward building a better future (Chomsky and Foucault, 1971). Through tracing the evolution of EPCOT as an idea for a community that would “always be in the state of becoming” to EPCOT Center as an inspirational theme park, this work contends that those ideas contain possibilities for how to interject utopian thought in schooling.
  • Development Without Eminent Domain Foundation of Freedom Inspires Urban Growth by Curt Pringle Mayor of the City of Anaheim

    Development Without Eminent Domain Foundation of Freedom Inspires Urban Growth by Curt Pringle Mayor of the City of Anaheim

    PERS P E C TIVES on Eminent Domain Abuse Volume2 Development Without Eminent Domain Foundation of Freedom Inspires Urban Growth by Curt Pringle Mayor of the City of Anaheim Perspectives on Eminent Domain Abuse is a series of independently authored reports published by the Institute for Justice June 2007 Development Without Eminent Domain Foundation of Freedom Inspires Urban Growth 1 Development Without Eminent Domain Foundation of Freedom Inspires Urban Growth by Curt Pringle Mayor of the City of Anaheim Among the greatest challenges housing for residents of different economic levels, and American mayors and city councils gave our tourists yet another reason to spend more face are how to create or revive a city’s time in our city. As we looked around the city, we urban core. Local leaders want to create saw an area around Anaheim’s Angel Stadium that dynamic downtowns with plenty of could be turned into a new, vibrant neighborhood people, jobs and housing. As a large with housing, retail shops and restaurants that would city in a major metropolitan region, both benefit from and support the stadium and the Anaheim faced these same challenges Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim, where the National when I was elected mayor in 2002. Hockey League’s Anaheim Ducks play. We wanted to Much of Anaheim had historically turn this area into a new destination: the “Platinum been zoned for low-intensity Triangle.” industrial uses. We wanted to When faced with a major redevelopment project, create an attractive area that many local governments use eminent domain— brought in jobs, provided new government’s legal power to seize private property for a purportedly public purpose, even over the objections of the property owner.
  • The Economic Impact of Theme Parks on Regions

    The Economic Impact of Theme Parks on Regions

    The economic impact of theme parks on regions LOREDANA GAL Critical analysis on the economic, social and environmental impact of theme park on regions based on Michael Braun’s article of NEURUS (– participant 1999/2000(UCI – WU). Analytical description of case studies: Expansion of Disneyland in Los Angeles, Designing of Istanbul Theme Park and Ankara Kingdom of Wild In Turkey. HOUSING RES.AND DESIGN S T U D I O I I ( 7 1 4 ) Middle East Technical University S u p e r v i s o r : P r o f . A L İ CENGİZKAN 6 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 1 INDEX • THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACTS OF TOURISM • THE IMPACT OF TOURISM ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES • EMPIRICAL TOURISM DATA • THEME PARKS • THE AMUSEMENT PARK INDUSTRY • MAJOR THEME PARKS REQUIREMENTS AND PROBLEMS • CASE STUDY: THE DISNEYLAND EXPANSION, ISTAMBUL THEME PARK, ANKARA KINGDOM OF THE WILD. INTRODUCTION How does the establishment of a Resort park affect the surrounding region? • Is it advantageous for a region to own a Resort park? • How are parks linked to the rest of the region’s economy? • How exactly does the park enrich the region economically? In the following paper will be analyzed the general issues regarding the projecting, expanding, constructing and managing an amusement park and it’s effective consequences on local government economy and social life of area’s inhabitants. Afterwards will see this aspects in case study: the expansion of Disneyland resort in Los Angeles, California ( costs, management, expected results); Designing and construction of Istanbul Theme Park, Turkey ( methods, procedures and expectation); Ankara Kingdom of Wild, Turkey ( land management, management problem, social results expectation) THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF TURISM Theme parks of a size like Disneyland, Walt Disney World, Knott's Berry Farm, Universal Studios are visited by tourists frequently.
  • Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Financial Report 13DEC201905470521 UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Financial Report 13DEC201905470521 UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    6JAN201605190975 Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Financial Report 13DEC201905470521 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 28, 2019 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________. Commission File Number 001-38842 Delaware 83-0940635 State or Other Jurisdiction of I.R.S. Employer Identification Incorporation or Organization 500 South Buena Vista Street Burbank, California 91521 Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code (818) 560-1000 Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value DIS New York Stock Exchange Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
  • Orange County Celebrates the Grand Opening of Anaheim Convention Center North

    Orange County Celebrates the Grand Opening of Anaheim Convention Center North

    ANAHEIM-Guide_Layout 1 9/21/17 4:23 PM Page 49 EXPANDING POSSIBILITIES Orange County Celebrates the Grand Opening of Anaheim Convention Center North Presented by CUSTOM CONTENT • September 25, 2017 ANAHEIM-Guide_Layout 1 9/21/17 4:23 PM Page 50 B-50 ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS JOURNAL ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 Expand It and They Will Come A local’s guide to the new Anaheim Convention Center North getting certifications. Anaheim had plenty of exhibit space, but not enough Pretty soon, all the tools will be packed up and the trucks will pull away from breakout space for educational sessions.” As a result, meeting planners started Anaheim Convention Center North. And the only task left will involve ribbon and to lean toward other cities like Dallas, San Francisco and Chicago. a pair of oversized scissors. For example, NAMM was one long-time show that was bursting at the seams. On September 26, The Grand Opening of ACC North will signal the beginning “After nearly 40 years in Anaheim, our members consider it their annual home of a new era in the history of the 50-year-old Anaheim Convention Center. It away from home,” says Cindy Sample, NAMM’s Director of Tradeshow also kicks off a new chapter in the story of our community, one that promises to Operations. But even so, “as the market for musical instruments, pro audio and make life better not only for our convention-going guests, but for entertainment technology has grown…additional space was us locals, too. The additional $9 million in annual revenue it is needed to meet the demands from our members and attendees.“ expected to yield will help fund a higher quality of life.
  • Corporate Media Is Corporate America

    Corporate Media Is Corporate America

    C2006_text-1.qxd 7/20/05 1:34 PM Page 253 CHAPTER 6 Corporate Media Is Corporate America BIG MEDIA INTERLOCKS WITH CORPORATE AMERICA AND BROADCAST NEWS MEDIA OWNERSHIP EMPIRES By Bridget Thornton, Brit Walters, and Lori Rouse The Project Censored team researched the board members of 10 major media organizations from newspaper to television to radio. Of these ten orga- nizations, we found there are 118 people who sit on 288 different Ameri- can and international corporate boards proving a close on-going interlock between big media and corporate America. We found media directors who also were former Senators or Representatives in the House such as Sam Nunn (Disney) and William Cohen (Viacom). Board members served at the FCC such as William Kennard (New York Times) and Dennis FitzSimmons (Tribune Company) showing revolving door relationships with big media andU.S. government officials. These ten big media organizations are the main source of news for most Americans. Their corporate ties require us to continually scrutinize the qual- ity of their news for bias. Disney owns ABC so we wonder how the board of Disney reacts to negative news about their board of directors friends such as Halliburton or Boeing. We see board members with connections to Ford, Kraft, and Kimberly-Clark who employ tens of thousands of Americans. Is it possible that theU.S. workforce receives only the corporate news private CENSORED 253 C2006_text-1.qxd 7/20/05 1:34 PM Page 254 companies want them to hear? Do we collectively realize that working peo- ple in theU.S.
  • CARTELS Beverley Moore a Thesis Submitted in Conformity

    CARTELS Beverley Moore a Thesis Submitted in Conformity

    THE EXTENT AND &PACI' OF COMMUNICATIONSCARTELS ON PUBLIC EDUCATION:1980 - 2000 Beverley Moore A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Cumculum, Teaching and Learning Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto O Copyright by Beverley Moore 2000 National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellmgtm Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence aliowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othewise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son pernission. autorisation. THE EXTENT AND IMPACT OF COMMUNiCATIONS CARTELS ON PUBLIC EDUCATION: 198012000 BEVERLEY MOORE DOCTOR OF PHILA)SOPHY DEPARTMENT OF CURRICULUM, TEACHING AND LEARNING UNIVElRSITY OF TORONTO WW The phenomenal growth, consolidation and influence of corporate wntrol in the communications sphere is changing the very nature ofour systern of public education.
  • The Walt Disney Company: the Entertainment King

    The Walt Disney Company: the Entertainment King

    For the exclusive use of Y. Zhang, 2016. 9-701-035 REV: JANUARY 5, 2009 MICHAEL G. RUKSTAD DAVID COLLIS The Walt Disney Company: The Entertainment King I only hope that we never lose sight of one thing—that it was all started by a mouse. — Walt Disney The Walt Disney Company’s rebirth under Michael Eisner was widely considered to be one of the great turnaround stories of the late twentieth century. When Eisner arrived in 1984, Disney was languishing and had narrowly avoided takeover and dismemberment. By the end of 2000, however, revenues had climbed from $1.65 billion to $25 billion, while net earnings had risen from $0.1 billion to $1.2 billion (see Exhibit 1). During those 15 years, Disney generated a 27% annual total return to shareholders.1 Analysts gave Eisner much of the credit for Disney’s resurrection. Described as “more hands on than Mother Teresa,” Eisner had a reputation for toughness.2 “If you aren’t tough,” he said, “you just don’t get quality. If you’re soft and fuzzy, like our characters, you become the skinny kid on the beach, and people in this business don't mind kicking sand in your face.”3 Disney’s later performance, however, had been well below Eisner’s 20% growth target. Return on equity which had averaged 20% through the first 10 years of the Eisner era began dropping after the ABC merger in 1996 and fell below 10% in 1999. Analysts attributed the decline to heavy investment in new enterprises (such as cruise ships and a new Anaheim theme park) and the third-place performance of the ABC television network.
  • 2001 Annual Report

    2001 Annual Report

    wdwCovers 12/18/01 5:17 PM Page 1 The Company ANNUAL REPORT 2001 wdwCovers 12/18/01 5:17 PM Page 2 Reveta F. Bowers John E. Bryson Roy E. Disney Michael D. Eisner Judith L. Estrin Stanley P. Gold Robert A. Iger Monica C. Lozano George J. Mitchell Thomas S. Murphy Leo J. O’Donovan, S.J. Sidney Poitier Robert A.M. Stern Andrea L. Van de Kamp Raymond L. Watson Gary L. Wilson 20210F01_P01.09_v2 12/18/01 5:19 PM Page 1 The Walt Disney Company and Subsidiaries CONTENT LISTING Financial Highlights 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 49 Letter to Shareholders 2 Consolidated Statements of Income 60 Financial Review 10 Consolidated Balance Sheets 61 DisneyHand 14 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 62 Parks and Resorts 18 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity 63 Walt Disney Imagineering 26 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 64 Studio Entertainment 28 Quarterly Financial Summary 77 Media Networks 36 Selected Financial Data 78 Broadcast Networks 37 Management’s Responsibility of Financial Statements 79 Cable Networks 38 Report of Independent Accountants 79 Consumer Products 44 Board of Directors and Corporate Executive Officers 80 Walt Disney International 48 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (In millions, except per share data) 2001 2000 Revenues(1) $25,256 $25,356 Segment operating income(1) 4,038 4,124 Diluted earnings per share before the cumulative effect of accounting changes, excluding restructuring and impairment charges and gain on the sale of businesses(1) 0.72 0.72 Cash flow from operations 3,048 3,755 Borrowings 9,769 9,461 Stockholders’ equity 22,672 24,100 (1) Pro forma revenues, segment operating income and earnings per share reflect the sale of Fairchild Publications, the acquisition of Infoseek, the conversion of Internet Group common stock into Disney common stock and the closure of the GO.com portal business as if these events and the adoption of SOP 00-2 had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2000, eliminating the one-time impact of those events.
  • 2003-Annual-Report.Pdf

    2003-Annual-Report.Pdf

    The Company 2003 ANNUAL REPORT CELEBRATING 75 YEARS OF MICKEY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 1 LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS 2 FINANCIAL REVIEW 10 COMPANY OVERVIEW 14 STUDIO ENTERTAINMENT 16 PARKS AND RESORTS 24 CONSUMER PRODUCTS 32 MEDIA NETWORKS 36 WALT DISNEY INTERNATIONAL 50 DISNEYHAND 51 ENVIRONMENTALITY 52 FINANCIAL SECTION 53 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 95 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (In millions, except per share data) 2003 2002 Revenues $27,061 $25,329 Segment operating income 3,174 2,822 Diluted earnings per share before the cumulative effect of accounting changes 0.65 0.60 Cash flow provided by operations 2,901 2,286 Borrowings Total 13,100 14,130 Net(1) 11,517 12,891 Shareholders’ equity 23,791 23,445 (1) Net borrowings represent total borrowings of $13,100 million less cash and cash equivalents of $1,583 million. 1#1 LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS To Fellow Owners and Cast Members: I’ve always believed that good news shouldn’t wait, so this year I thought I’d start right off with a review of the numbers. In 2003, we experienced solid earnings growth despite the difficult economic and geopolitical environment that prevailed during most of the year. Most significantly, our fourth quarter was very strong, with more than double the earnings of Q4 in 2002, underscoring our confidence in generating growth in the new year. Equally important, we delivered free cash flow for the year that was up more than 50 percent over last year and continued to bolster our balance sheet. During fiscal 2003, our stock price appreciated 36 percent, compared to the S&P 500’s growth of 25 percent.
  • Roster of Organizations That Have Participated in the National Sports Forum (As of April 16, 2010)

    Roster of Organizations That Have Participated in the National Sports Forum (As of April 16, 2010)

    Roster of Organizations That Have Participated in The National Sports Forum (as of April 16, 2010) Major League Baseball Green Bay Packers (25 Organizations) Houston Texans Anaheim Ducks Indianapolis Colts Atlanta Thrashers Arizona Diamondbacks Jacksonville Jaguars Boston Bruins Baltimore Orioles Miami Dolphins Buffalo Sabres Boston Red Sox Minnesota Vikings Calgary Flames Chicago White Sox New Orleans Saints Carolina Hurricanes Cincinnati Reds New York Jets Colorado Avalanche Cleveland Indians NFL Properties Columbus Blue Jackets Colorado Rockies Oakland Raiders Dallas Stars Detroit Tigers Philadelphia Eagles Detroit Red Wings Florida Marlins Pittsburgh Steelers Edmonton Oilers Houston Astros St. Louis Rams Los Angeles Kings Kansas City Royals San Diego Chargers Minnesota Wild Los Angeles Angels of San Francisco 49ers Nashville Predators Anaheim Washington Red Skins New Jersey Devils Los Angeles Dodgers New York Islanders Major League Baseball National Basketball NHL Milwaukee Brewers Association Philadelphia Flyers Minnesota Twins (21 Organizations) Phoenix Coyotes New York Mets Pittsburgh Penguins New York Yankees Atlanta Hawks St. Louis Blues Pittsburgh Pirates Charlotte Hornets Tampa Bay Lightning Philadelphia Phillies Cleveland Cavaliers Toronto Maple Leafs San Diego Padres Dallas Mavericks San Francisco Giants Denver Nuggets Seattle Mariners Detroit Pistons Major League Soccer Tampa Bay Devil Rays Golden State Warriors (9 Organizations) Texas Rangers Houston Rockets Toronto Blue Jays Indiana Pacers Chicago Fire Washington Nationals