Activists Oppose BRAI Bill
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Athirapally Hydel Electric Project
Athirapally Hydel Electric Project drishtiias.com/printpdf/athirapally-hydel-electric-project Why in News Recently, the Kerala government has approved the proposed Athirapally Hydro Electric Project (AHEP) on the Chalakudy river in Thrissur district of the state. There are already five dams for power and one for irrigation and it will be the seventh along the 145 km course of the Chalakudy river. Chalakudy River It originates in the Anamalai region of Tamil Nadu and is joined by its major tributaries Parambikulam, Kuriyarkutti, Sholayar, Karapara and Anakayam in Kerala. The river flows through Palakkad, Thrissur and Ernakulam districts of Kerala. It is the 4th longest river in Kerala and one of very few rivers of Kerala, which is having relics of riparian vegetation in substantial level. A riparian zone is the interface between land and a river or stream. Plant habitats and communities along the river margins and banks are called riparian vegetation, characterized by hydrophilic plants. It is the richest river in fish diversity perhaps in India as it contains 85 species of freshwater fishes out of the 152 species known from Kerala only. The famous waterfalls, Athirappilly Falls and Vazhachal Falls, are situated on this river. It merges with the Periyar River near Puthenvelikkara in Ernakulam district. Key Points 1/3 The total installed capacity of AHEP is 163 MW and the project is supposed to make use of the tail end water coming out of the existing Poringalkuthu Hydro Electric Project that is constructed across the Chalakudy river. AHEP envisages diverting water from the Poringalkuthu project as well as from its own catchment of 26 sq km. -
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD on Athirappilly HE Project -163 MW Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP)
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Presentation on Athirappilly HE Project -163 MW before Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) Chalakudy, Thrissur – 29 th January 2011 Athirappilly HE Project – 163 MW Athirappilly HEP ––LocationLocation Proposed project is located in Chalakudy river basin in Thrissur District, Kerala State Cascade Scheme with 94 % utilization of tail race discharges and spills from existing upstream reservoirs Projects up stream Sholayar Hydro Electric Project (54MW) Poringalkuthu Hydro Electric Project (48MW) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Athirappilly HE Project – 163 MW An overview Athirappilly project KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Athirappilly HE Project – 163 MW Surge Dam Reservoir Tunnel Dam toe Power House Power House Vertical shaft Kannankuzhy thodu Kannankuzhythodu LONGITUDINAL SECTION Poringal dam Charpa Poringal Power Houses Poringal Adit Reservoir Tunnel Athirappilly Reservoir Dam toe PH To Sholayar Surge SH 21 Pokalappara Colony Dam Power House(2X80) MW Replacement Road To Chalakudy Athirappilly Falls Chalakudy River LAY OUT PLAN Athirappilly HE Project – 163 MW • The upstream most project is Sholayar which is operation since 1966. • The Sholayar project utilizes the water resources of Sholayar River a tributary of Chalakudy River • The tail water of Sholayar after generation flows to downstream Poringalkuthu reservoir. • The Poringalkuthu project is in operation for more than 50 years it is in the main river itself. Athirappilly HE Project – 163 MW • The tail water of Poringalkuthu discharges to Chalakudy -
List of Lacs with Local Body Segments (PDF
TABLE-A ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES AND THEIR EXTENT Serial No. and Name of EXTENT OF THE CONSTITUENCY Assembly Constituency 1-Kasaragod District 1 -Manjeshwar Enmakaje, Kumbla, Mangalpady, Manjeshwar, Meenja, Paivalike, Puthige and Vorkady Panchayats in Kasaragod Taluk. 2 -Kasaragod Kasaragod Municipality and Badiadka, Bellur, Chengala, Karadka, Kumbdaje, Madhur and Mogral Puthur Panchayats in Kasaragod Taluk. 3 -Udma Bedadka, Chemnad, Delampady, Kuttikole and Muliyar Panchayats in Kasaragod Taluk and Pallikere, Pullur-Periya and Udma Panchayats in Hosdurg Taluk. 4 -Kanhangad Kanhangad Muncipality and Ajanur, Balal, Kallar, Kinanoor – Karindalam, Kodom-Belur, Madikai and Panathady Panchayats in Hosdurg Taluk. 5 -Trikaripur Cheruvathur, East Eleri, Kayyur-Cheemeni, Nileshwar, Padne, Pilicode, Trikaripur, Valiyaparamba and West Eleri Panchayats in Hosdurg Taluk. 2-Kannur District 6 -Payyannur Payyannur Municipality and Cherupuzha, Eramamkuttoor, Kankole–Alapadamba, Karivellur Peralam, Peringome Vayakkara and Ramanthali Panchayats in Taliparamba Taluk. 7 -Kalliasseri Cherukunnu, Cheruthazham, Ezhome, Kadannappalli-Panapuzha, Kalliasseri, Kannapuram, Kunhimangalam, Madayi and Mattool Panchayats in Kannur taluk and Pattuvam Panchayat in Taliparamba Taluk. 8-Taliparamba Taliparamba Municipality and Chapparapadavu, Kurumathur, Kolacherry, Kuttiattoor, Malapattam, Mayyil, and Pariyaram Panchayats in Taliparamba Taluk. 9 -Irikkur Chengalayi, Eruvassy, Irikkur, Payyavoor, Sreekandapuram, Alakode, Naduvil, Udayagiri and Ulikkal Panchayats in Taliparamba -
Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Civil
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3438-3439 OF 2020 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.17313-17314 of 2011) HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION OF MUDUMALAI ….. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS IN DEFENCE OF ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMALS AND ORS. ETC. …..RESPONDENT(S) WITH Civil Appeal No.3437 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 20154 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3440 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21460 of 2011 Civil Appeal Nos.3442-3443 of 2020 SLP (C) Nos. 21463-21464 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3444 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21461 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3445 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 16668 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3447 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 17160 of 2011 Civil Appeal Nos.3448-3449 of 2020 SLP (C) Nos. 17155-17156 of 2011 1 Civil Appeal Nos.3450-51 of 2020 SLP (C) Nos. 17150-17151 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3446 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21480 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3452 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21467 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3453 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21472 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3454 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21477 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3455 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21478 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3456 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21470 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3457 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21468 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3458 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 21469 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3459 of 2020 SLP (C) No. 24826 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.3460 of 2020 SLP (C) No. -
Tourism Impact Assessment in Forested Land Using Geo Informatics
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER) ISSN (Online): 2347-3878 (UGC Approved, Sr. No. 48096) Index Copernicus Value (2015): 62.86 | Impact Factor (2015): 3.791 Tourism Impact Assessment in Forested Land Using Geo Informatics Subin K. Jose*, Radhulakshmi V S Christ College (Autonomous), Thrissur, Kerala, India Abstract: The environment is being increasingly recognized as a key factor in tourism. The main purpose of tourism activities is the deployment of recreational facilities in an area with tourism potential. Tourism in Athirappilly is the largest industry, that providing several benefits to government and rural peoples. Tourism emergence, which lead naturally or consciously to the degradation of tourist heritage are represented by the natural disturbance of the surface areas of tourist interest and forest cover. The study focused on the impacts of tourism on forest area in Athirappilly region by comparing Landsat images from 1985 and 2012.The work was mapping the affected areas of forest as a result of tourism introduction based on physical characteristics. These are landscape or naturalness (land use/cover), topography (slope, drainage) and settlement size. At First, a list of tourism related criteria were developed. In present study raster based weightage method was carried out for the preparation of tourism disturbance map. GIS based techniques were used to measure the ranking of different criteria according those with the best potential for the study data utilized include survey of India to geographic maps. Subsequently, the forest disturbance map was created based on the combination of criteria and factors with their respective weights. The disturbed area of forest was classified as very high, high, moderate and low. -
Southern India Project Elephant Evaluation Report
SOUTHERN INDIA PROJECT ELEPHANT EVALUATION REPORT Mr. Arin Ghosh and Dr. N. Baskaran Technical Inputs: Dr. R. Sukumar Asian Nature Conservation Foundation INNOVATION CENTRE, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, BANGALORE 560012, INDIA 27 AUGUST 2007 CONTENTS Page No. CHAPTER I - PROJECT ELEPHANT GENERAL - SOUTHERN INDIA -------------------------------------01 CHAPTER II - PROJECT ELEPHANT KARNATAKA -------------------------------------------------------06 CHAPTER III - PROJECT ELEPHANT KERALA -------------------------------------------------------15 CHAPTER IV - PROJECT ELEPHANT TAMIL NADU -------------------------------------------------------24 CHAPTER V - OVERALL CONCLUSIONS & OBSERVATIONS -------------------------------------------------------32 CHAPTER - I PROJECT ELEPHANT GENERAL - SOUTHERN INDIA A. Objectives of the scheme: Project Elephant was launched in February 1992 with the following major objectives: 1. To ensure long-term survival of the identified large elephant populations; the first phase target, to protect habitats and existing ranges. 2. Link up fragmented portions of the habitat by establishing corridors or protecting existing corridors under threat. 3. Improve habitat quality through ecosystem restoration and range protection and 4. Attend to socio-economic problems of the fringe populations including animal-human conflicts. Eleven viable elephant habitats (now designated Project Elephant Ranges) were identified across the country. The estimated wild population of elephants is 30,000+ in the country, of which a significant -
Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society
' <«» til 111 . JOURNAL OF THE BOMBAY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY Hornbill House, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, Mumbai 400 001 Executive Editor Asad R. Rahmani, Ph. D Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai Copy and Production Editor Vibhuti Dedhia, M. Sc. Editorial Board M.R. Almeida, D. Litt. T.C. Narendran, Ph. D., D. Sc. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai Professor, Department of Zoology, University of Calicut, Kerala Ajith Kumar, Ph. D. National Centre for Biological Sciences, GKVK Campus, Aasheesh Pittie, B. Com. Hebbal, Bangalore Bird Watchers Society of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad M.K. Chandrashekaran, Ph. D., D. Sc. Nehru Professor, Jawaharlal Centre G.S. Rawat, Ph. D. for Scientific Research, Advanced Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun Bangalore K. Rema Devi, Ph. D. Anwaruddin Choudhury, Ph. D., D. Sc. Zoological Survey of India, Chennai The Rhino Foundation for Nature, Guwahati J.S. Singh, Ph. D. Indraneil Das, D. Phil. Professor, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia, Sarawak, Malaysia S. Subramanya, Ph. D. University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, P.T. Cherian, Ph. D. Hebbal, Bangalore Emeritus Scientist, Department of Zoology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum R. Sukumar, Ph. D. Professor, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Y.V. Jhala, Ph. D. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore Wildlife Institute of India, Dehrdun K. Ullas Karanth, Ph. D. Romulus Whitaker, B Sc. Wildlife Conservation Society - India Program, Madras Reptile Park and Crocodile Bank Trust, Bangalore, Karnataka Tamil Nadu Senior Consultant Editor J.C. Daniel, M. Sc. Consultant Editors Raghunandan Chundawat, Ph. D. Wildlife Conservation Society, Bangalore Nigel Collar, Ph. D. BirdLife International, UK Rhys Green, Ph. -
TREK to NILGIRIS for OFFICER TRAINEES of SFC of MCRHRDIT from 15Th to 22Nd Mar 2020
TREK TO NILGIRIS FOR OFFICER TRAINEES OF SFC OF MCRHRDIT From 15th to 22nd Mar 2020 The Beginning! MCRHRD Hyderabad Airport Coimbatore Airport Ooty 6 different campsites LADAKH SPITI WESTERN ARUNACHAL KANCHENJUNGA BHARATPUR RANTHAMBHORE GANGA BASIN PANNA SATPURA- SIMLIPAL MAIKAL GODAVARI GIR BASIN SUNDARBANS RUSHIKULIYA WESTERN GHATS NILGIRIS Critical Landscapes Landscapes Critical WESTERN GHATS NILGIRIS LANDSCAPE NORTHERN COMPLEX Worlds single largest Asian Elephant Population Tigers strong hold FOREST DIVISIONS SOUTHERN COMPLEX NILGIRIS LANDSCAPE WESTERN GHATS NILGIRIS LANDSCAPE NORTHERN COMPLEX . It has the single largest contiguous population of Asiatic elephants in its range and holds the key to the long term survival of the species. Over 6,000 elephants live in the Nilgiri and Eastern Ghats Landscape which spreads over an area of about 12,000km2. Other large mammals found in the area are the gaur, sambar and tiger. The terrain of the landscape is mostly undulating with low hills. The area extends from the south of the Brahmagiri hills in Karnataka through the Wayanad plateau into the northern Nilgiri hill slopes and the Mysore plateau which links up to the Sigur plateau and the Moyar river valley. The Moyar valley rises up the slopes of the Eastern Ghats leading into the Thalamalai plateau going up to the east of the Biligirirangan range into Bargur, Sathyamangalam and Madeshwaramalai up to the Cauvery River. SOUTHERN COMPLEX . The Southern Western Ghats (SWG) cover an area of 7000km2through the states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu and harbour a very rich floral and faunal biodiversity. It forms one of the largest contiguous blocks of ‘good’ forest cover in the Southern Western Ghats. -
(Aves: Phasianidae) in Sigur Plateau, the Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India
Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2018. 3(1): 80–87 DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2018.010 POPULATION STATUS, HABITAT SELECTION AND PEOPLE’S PERCEPTION ON PAVO CRISTATUS (AVES: PHASIANIDAE) IN SIGUR PLATEAU, THE NILGIRIS, TAMIL NADU, INDIA Arockianathan Samson*, Balasundaram Ramakrishnan Government Arts College, India *e-mail: [email protected] Received: 12.11.2017 The present study aimed to estimate the population status, habitat utilisation and threats to the Indian peafowl in Sigur Plateau, Tamil Nadu from November 2016 to March 2017. A total of 1091 individuals of peafowls were recorded in 487 sightings in 1080 km (2.28 ± 0.05) with the encounter rate of 1.01 individuals / km. In Dry Deciduous Forest a total of 570 individuals of peafowls were recorded in 224 sightings in 460 km (2.28 ± 0.05, ER = 1.01 individuals / km). In Dry Thorn Forest a total of 521 individuals of peafowls were recorded in 254 sightings in 620 km (2.05 ± 0.06) ER = 0.84 individuals / km. A total of 19 roosting trees species were identified, all recorded in thorn forest; similarly nine species were recorded in dry deciduous forest. The highest number of roosts were recorded in Tectona grandis (n = 27); the average height of the tree species was 14.46 m and the average Indian peafowl roost height was 11.25. The Indian peafowl has decreased; the reason for invading the human habitation was the loss of food (n = 60). Crop damage by peafowl shows that beans (50%) were highly damaged followed by chilly (37%), tomato (5%) and ragi (4%) and corn (1%). -
Annual Report 2015 Research University of Calicut
ANNUAL REPORT 2015 RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT Editorial Committee: The Vice Chancellor (Chairman) The Registrar The Finance Officer The Publication Officer The Public Relations Officer Adv. P. M. Niyas, Member, Syndicate Dr. V .P. Abdul Hameed, Member, Syndicate Adv. Rajeevan Mallissery, Member, Syndicate Dr. C. O. Joshi, Member, Syndicate Sri. O. Abdul Ali, Member, Syndicate Dr. Muhammedali N., Dept. of Mass Communication & Journalism, Member, Senate Sri. E. K. Vijayan M.L.A, Member, Senate Sri. Vallanchira Mohammedali,Member, Senate Sri. Prasanth Rajesh.M.S, Member, Senate Dr. Abdul Gafoor, Dept. of Education Dr. Anil Vallathol, Dept. of Malayalam Prof. Sabu, Dept. of Botany Dr. P. Raveendran, Dept. of Chemistry Prof. N. Ramani, Dept of Zoology Prof. K. K. Eliyas, Dept. of Bio-Technology Prof. Retnaraj, Dept. of Economics Superintendent, Calicut University Press Deputy Registrar, Pl. D (Convenor) CUP 11644/C/16/350 FOREWARD The research departments of a university are the places where new knowledge is created, where the theoretical and the empirical meet, where academic scholarship connects with the outside world, guiding thought, producing ideas and developing solutions. The Directorate of Research (DoR) of the University of Calicut was established on 18 April 2012 to coordinate and guide the research activities of its 171 research centres in an effective and fruitful way so that the highest possible standards of excellence would be attained. Its mission is to initiate and promote research projects that address challenges and issues in the frontier areas and to administer and guide the 37 university departments and 134 other approved research centres so that a generative research environment can be sustained and doctoral students trained in cutting edge research. -
Socio-Ecological Characterisation of the Project Landscape English Pdf
Arulagam/Care Earth 2012 Socio-Ecological Characterisation of the Project Landscape 1 Arulagam/Care Earth 2012 Introduction River Moyar originates in the Nilgiris of the Western Ghats, flowing West to East along the Tamilnadu and Karnataka State border. Originating near the hill town of Gudalur (11°51’43.30”N; 76°53’53.30”E) in Nilgiris, the river courses down through the Moyar gorge; meanders through dry forest plains before draining in to the Bhavanisagar reservoir (11°29’N; 77°03’E) .It is one of the largest rivers in the Nilgiris with a total length of about 85- 90 km. The three major tributaries of River Moyar are: Kedrahalla, Sigur River and Kahanhalla while Sandynallah, Naduvattam, Melkodmund and Lone Valley streams are the minor tributaries. River Moyar has the distinction of running its course through the forests of the Western Ghats, on a rainfall gradient of about 5000 mm at the Nilgiris to Bhavanisagar where the annual rainfall is just 500-600 mm. This steep descent renders the region a unique character; supporting not just a diversity of habitats and species but also interesting human settlements and traditions. Despite this, River Moyar receives little or no attention for any conservation action. This was possibly the most significant finding of the characterization process, followed by the fact that a number of organizations/government departments that are mandated to utilize and plan for the protection of the river function with little or no horizontal integration. More disappointing is the fact that the interventions are rather limited in terms of a vision, and at best can be described as ad-hoc. -
Central Water Commission Hydrological Studies Organisation Hydrology (S) Directorate
Government of India Central Water Commission Hydrological Studies Organisation Hydrology (S) Directorate STUDY REPORT KERALA FLOODS OF AUGUST 2018 September, 2018 Contents Page No. 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Earlier floods in Kerala 2 2.0 District wise rainfall realised during 1st June 2018 to 22nd August 3 2018 3.0 Analysis of rainfall data 3 3.1 Analysis of rainfall records of 15th to 17th August 2018 5 3.2 Reservoirs in Kerala 6 4.0 Volume of runoff generated during 15th to 17th August 2018 rainfall 7 4.1 Runoff computations of Periyar sub-basin 7 4.1.1 Reservoir operation of Idukki 10 4.1.2 Reservoir operation of Idamalayar 12 4.2 Runoff computations for Pamba sub-basin 13 4.2.1 Reservoir operation of Kakki 16 4.2.2 Combined runoff of Pamba, Manimala, Meenachil and Achenkovil 18 rivers 4.3 Runoff computations for Chalakudy sub-basin 21 4.4 Runoff computations for Bharathapuzha sub-basin 25 4.5 Runoff computations for Kabini sub-basin 28 5.0 Rainfall depths realised for entire Kerala during 15-17, August 2018 31 and estimated runoff 6.0 Findings of CWC Study 32 7.0 Recommendations 35 8.0 Limitations 36 Annex-I: Water level plots of CWC G&D sites 37-39 Annex-II: Rasters of 15-17 August 2018 rainfall 40-43 Annex-III: Isohyets of Devikulam storm of 1924 44-46 Central Water Commission Hydrology (S) Dte Kerala Flood of August 2018 1.0 Introduction Kerala State has an average annual precipitation of about 3000 mm.