Open Space, Smart Growth, Urban Sprawl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open Space, Smart Growth, Urban Sprawl Open Space, Smart Growth, Urban Sprawl Kai Anderson, GSA Congressional Science Fellow Discussions with friends and col- presence of polluted industrial sites called leagues who live and work beyond the “brownfields.” Developers are commonly Washington, D.C., Beltway commonly loath to assume the regulatory risk and lead to the question of how the impeach- considerable expense associated with ment trial of President Clinton affected cleanup of such sites and choose instead my work as a Congressional Science Fel- to develop in cheaper, previously undevel- low. I compare the atmosphere on Capitol oped “greenfields” on the outskirts of Hill during the impeachment process to a existing communities. persistent but not impenetrable fog at San Greenfields development is only one Francisco International Airport. Much as of the forces that contributes to sprawl; foggy conditions cause re-routings and migration to the suburbs reflects people’s Open space is one of the most obvi- flight delays, impeachment proceedings in desire to live in a safe, healthy environ- ous casualties of urban sprawl. Farmland the Senate chamber disrupted the legisla- ment near open space and quality schools. and forests disappear as residential and tive routine at the beginning of the 106th For those who live in suburbs across the commercial development radiate away Congress. country, morning and evening commute from urban centers and crop up along My experience within the belly of the times are on the rise as traffic congestion roads and highways. In many cases, com- impeachment beast suggests that the com- grows more pronounced, in part because munities are hard pressed to raise the mon perception that the trial brought the more folks seek to realize the perceived money necessary to purchase and protect Senate to a standstill is only partly true. advantages of suburban life. In many urban and suburban green spaces for per- The trial slowed the pace of Senate busi- places, vigorous suburban development manent conservation. This problem is ness, and legislative initiatives were placed has led, ironically, to the disappearance of compounded by the reality that the most in a temporary holding pattern as their the open space so coveted by those who successful open space conservation authors waited for the impeachment fog led the population migration away from requires coordinated local and regional to clear. However, during the trial, out of urban centers. Bulldozers and construction planning efforts. These observations sug- view of most of America, legislation con- projects have leapfrogged toward the gest that the most productive federal cerning issues as disparate as open space countryside as development has spread efforts to mitigate urban sprawl may prove conservation and education funding was outward from urban centers. This growth to be those that provide funds to help fos- being written, vetted, and rewritten. As has stranded many suburbanites—an hour ter regional, state, and local collaborative soon as the trial ended, legislators intro- or more of stressful driving from their planning and those that provide financial duced a flurry of bills in an effort to make places of work—in subdivisions that lack assistance for state and local acquisition up for real and perceived lost time. the urban amenities they once traded for and enhancement of open space. Although the regular Senate business open space and a quieter lifestyle. suffered an extended slowdown during the Bills for Bills impeachment saga, the same was not true Where Are Those The Land and Water Conservation for my particular workload. At about the Wide Open Spaces? Fund of 1964 (LWCF) represents a viable, same time Kenneth Starr delivered his Open space is increasingly a priority though traditionally underappropriated, report to the House of Representatives, my issue for Americans. In November 1998, source of federal money dedicated to open mentor, Senator Lieberman’s longtime voters passed more than 70% of state and space conservation. The fund is authorized environment and energy advisor, was local ballot initiatives designed to encour- to receive up to $900 million annually in promoted to a post as the minority staff age smart growth and protect open space. royalty revenue from outer continental director for the Government Affairs Com- Nationwide, the desire to protect open shelf oil and gas production. The purchase mittee. My supervisor’s promotion caused space and mitigate and avoid the negative of the Headwaters Forest of Northern Cali- an order of magnitude increase in the vol- impacts of urban sprawl are contributing fornia is a recent example of LWCF open ume of paper landing on my desk and a to a groundswell of support for so-called space acquisition. In practice, because the similar increase in my portfolio of issues. smart growth practices. fund is subject to the annual appropria- The temporary but dramatic expansion of Smart growth is seen by many people tions process, it rarely receives full fund- my responsibilities early in my fellowship to be an antidote to the plague of unmiti- ing. Moreover, despite the widespread year allowed me the opportunity to play a gated urban sprawl. Many things con- popularity of the fund, the portion of it significant role in designing Senator tribute to urban sprawl, and unraveling allocated for use by state and local govern- Lieberman’s environment and energy leg- the direct relationship between cause and ments has been defunct for the past five islative agenda for 1999. effect is challenging. The Senate Smart years. Growth Task Force (SGTF), in which my The presence of an authorized vehicle Paradoxes of Urban Sprawl boss is participating, provides a forum for (the LWCF) and the bipartisan grassroots One issue that has captured the atten- better delineating the effects that federal demand for both open space conservation tion of some lawmakers is the relationship policies and programs have on urban and smart growth planning efforts pro- between open space conservation and sprawl. For example, the SGTF hosted a vides a rare opportunity to create a perma- urban sprawl. Issues such as urban sprawl, dialogue on how federal funding for trans- nently dedicated trust fund, exempt from which reflect many interrelated problems, portation projects has impacted commu- the annual appropriations process, to sup- require multifaceted solutions. To compre- nity development historically (for better port federal, state, and local open space hensively address urban sprawl, communi- and worse) and how future transportation acquisition. Several bills introduced in the ties must understand the barriers to urban funding might best be used to encourage Senate this year aim to capitalize on this renewal and the incentives that drive smart growth practices and prevent urban opportunity: migration to suburban areas. One key sprawl. • Dianne Feinstein’s (Democrat—Cali- obstacle to urban redevelopment is the fornia) Conservation and Recreation 10 GSA TODAY, July 1999 Improvement Act of 1999 guarantees that Summer Outreach Conundrum money in the LWCF would be available annually without further appropriation. • Similar to the Feinstein bill, the Con- I Want to Lead a Field Trip— servation and Reinvestment Act of 1999 introduced by Senator Mary Landrieu Now All I Need is an Audience (Democrat—Louisiana) would exempt LWCF money from the annual appropria- Wendy Cunningham, Senior Project Coordinator, GSA tions process. In addition, the Landrieu bill would provide $1.24 billion dollars of “impact assistance” to coastal and Great Summer is here! For many of us, sum- Some good places to start locating these Lakes states through a formula based on mer means opportunities for field work, groups are: your town’s chamber of com- coastline length, coastal population, and professional development, and (let’s face merce; the phone book (community production of oil and gas on federal outer it) fun. Summer is the perfect time to pages); churches, synagogues, temples; continental shelf properties. develop and participate in enjoyable out- community centers (YMCA, YWCA); com- • A third contending Senate bill is the reach activities, especially those that give munity newspapers; school district offices; Permanent Protection For America’s Re- you an excuse to get outside. Leading field community Internet pages. sources 2000 sponsored by Barbara Boxer trips is a great way to enjoy the outdoors • Do not be discouraged if you do not (Democrat—California). As with the Fein- while supporting your community by find an audience right away. Ask groups stein and Landrieu initiatives, the Boxer enhancing public knowledge of and you contact if they know of other groups bill stipulates that the LWCF be available appreciation for Earth and its resources. who might have the ability or interest to every year without further appropriation. For many geoscientists, the hardest part of go on field trips. Moreover, it earmarks additional funds conducting a field trip is finding an audi- • Once you have made a contact, work generated by the outer continental shelf ence and preparing the trip for non-geo- together to develop a field trip that will royalties to be used for a broad range of scientists. Below, we have provided some cater to the knowledge and interests of conservation activities, including habitat ideas to guide you in developing reward- your audience. restoration and farmland protection. ing, successful field trips. • Be sure to explain what geoscientists do I spent much of my time during the • Come up with a few ideas for field trips and how geoscience impacts everyone’s impeachment proceedings evaluating that you would feel comfortable leading. If lives. You might also consider wearing these proposals and drafting an open you are not sure what would be of interest your field gear on the trip. space conservation bill more sensitive to to the public, ask a nonscientist friend or If leading a field trip doesn’t appeal to the priorities of non–petroleum-producing relative. Check the newspaper for issues of you, there are multitudes of other oppor- coastal states such as Connecticut.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Can Public Procurement Aid The
    Can public procurement aid the implementation of smart specialization strategies? Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitiaa*, Edurne Magrob, Elvira Uyarrac, Kieron Flanaganc a.- Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastian (Spain) b.- Orkestra-Basque Institute of Competitiveness, University of Deusto, Donostia-San Sebastian (Spain) c.- Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester (United Kingdom) * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract In recent decades sub-national regions have become ever more important as spaces for policy making. The current focus on research and innovation for smart specialisation strategies is the latest manifestation of this trend. By putting PPI processes at the core of regional and local development initiatives to support innovation, governments can go beyond priority setting to become active stakeholders engaged in entrepreneurial discovery processes. In this paper we offer a new conceptualization of how such smart specialisation strategies, as an example of a sub- national innovation policy, can help articulate demand for innovation. The paper presents an evolutionary framework that relates regional specialisation processes with the scale and scope of the demand associated to that specialisation. We identify four different roles for governments to be played, depending on the availability of local capabilities and the scale of the chosen priorities: government as a lead user, government as an innovation catalyst,
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development By Ian Robinson Carlton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Professor Robert Cervero Professor Dwight Jaffee Fall 2013 © Copyright by Ian Robinson Carlton 2013 All Rights Reserved Abstract Transit Planning Practice in the Age of Transit-Oriented Development by Ian Robinson Carlton Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Globally, urban development near transit stations has long been understood to be critical to transit’s success primarily because it can contribute to ridership and improve the efficiency of transit investments. In the United States in particular, fixed-guideway transit’s land use-shaping capability has been an important justification and goal for transit investment. In fact, today’s U.S. federal funding policies increasingly focus on achieving transit-oriented real estate development near new transit infrastructure. However, the widespread implementation of transit and land use coordination practices has been considered an uphill battle. The academic literature suggests the most effective practice may be for U.S. transit planners to locate transit stations where pre-existing conditions are advantageous for real estate development or transit investments can generate the political will to dramatically alter local conditions to make them amenable to real estate development. However, prior to this study, no research had investigated the influence of real estate development considerations on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Smart Growth: a Primer
    WHY SMART GROWTH: A PRIMER International City/County Management Association with Geoff Anderson ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to acknowledge the efforts of Geoffrey Anderson of the U.S. Environ­ mental Protection Agency (EPA). Without his assistance this primer would not exist. In addition, Mike Siegel, Gary Lawrence, Don Chen, Reid Ewing, Paul Alsenas, reviewers at the National Association of Counties and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), and many others provided invaluable suggestions and expertise. A final thank you to Kendra Briechle for helping to pull it all together. About the Smart Growth Network The Smart Growth Network is a coalition of private sector, public sector, and non- governmental partner organizations seeking to create smart growth in neighborhoods, communities, and regions across the United States. Network Partners include the U.S. EPA's Urban and Economic Development Division, ICMA, Center for Neighborhood Technology, Congress for the New Urbanism, Joint Center for Sustainable Communi­ ties, Natural Resources Defense Council, The Northeast-Midwest Institute, State of Maryland, Surface Transportation Policy Project, Sustainable Communities Network, and Urban Land Institute. About the International City/County Management Association ICMA is the professional and educational association for appointed administrators and assistant administrators serving cities, towns, villages, boroughs, townships, coun­ ties, and regional councils. ICMA serves as the organizational home of the Smart Growth Network and runs the Network’s membership program. ICMA helps local governments create sustainable communities through smart growth activities and related programs. For more information on the Smart Growth Network, contact ICMA or visit the Smart Growth Website at http://www.smartgrowth.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth and Economic Success: Benefits for Real Estate Developers, Investors, Businesses, and Local Governments
    United States December 2012 Environmental Protection Agency www.epa.gov/smartgrowth SMART GROWTH AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS: BENEFITS FOR REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, INVESTORS, BUSINESSES, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Office of Sustainable Communities Smart Growth Program (Distributed at 1/14/13 Sustainable Thurston Task Force meeting) Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the EPA’s Office of Sustainable Communities with the assistance of Renaissance Planning Group under contract number EP-W-11-009/010/11. Principal Staff Contacts: Melissa Kramer and Lee Sobel Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. Cover photos (left to right, top to bottom): Barracks Row in Washington, D.C., courtesy of Lee Sobel; TRAX light rail in Sandy, Utah, courtesy of Melissa Kramer; Mission Creek Senior Community in San Francisco, California, courtesy of Alan Karchmer and Mercy Housing Inc. (Distributed at 1/14/13 Sustainable Thurston Task Force meeting) Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i I. Economic Advantages of Smart Growth Strategies .............................................................................. 1 II. Economic Advantages of Compact Development ................................................................................. 4 A. Higher Revenue Generation per Acre of Land .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth Guide
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT CLIMATE AND ENERGY STRATEGY SERIES Smart Growth A Guide to Developing and Implementing Greenhouse Gas Reductions Programs Community Planning and Design U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2011 EPA’s Local Government Climate and Energy Strategy Series The Local Government Climate and Energy Strategy Series provides a comprehensive, straightforward overview of green- house gas (GHG) emissions reduction strategies for local governments. Topics include energy efficiency, transportation, community planning and design, solid waste and materials management, and renewable energy. City, county, territorial, tribal, and regional government staff, and elected officials can use these guides to plan, implement, and evaluate their climate change mitigation and energy projects. Each guide provides an overview of project benefits, policy mechanisms, investments, key stakeholders, and other imple- mentation considerations. Examples and case studies highlighting achievable results from programs implemented in communities across the United States are incorporated throughout the guides. While each guide stands on its own, the entire series contains many interrelated strategies that can be combined to create comprehensive, cost-effective programs that generate multiple benefits. For example, efforts to improve energy efficiency can be combined with transportation and community planning programs to reduce GHG emissions, decrease energy and transportation costs, improve air quality and public health, and enhance quality of life. LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Sprawl Vs. Smart Growth
    By Spr Elizabeth Humstone Vermont Forum on Sprawl Smart Growth: 2 These necessities typically i housing, clothing, furniture, a vary in generosity from state to Hampshire allows a $50,000 while in Texas, the entire home less of value. ow governments choose to invest public might inadvertently be supporting sprawl in the resources can play a key role in economic develop- Green Mountain State. To help inform policy ment and growth patterns. Decisions on road con- makers, VSGC comprehensively analyzed the Hstruction, sewer extensions, school siting, and the state’s investments, policies, and programs, identi- like can make all the difference in creating healthy, fying those that supported smart growth and those sustainable communities. Unfortunately, economic that encouraged sprawl. VSGC’s findings are development policy is often crafted or carried out instructive for states that want to formulate policy in ways that unwittingly support sprawl—low den- that minimizes costs and promotes economic sity, disconnected, auto-dependent development— development, affordable housing, transportation, which can impose sizable costs on communities and downtown revitalization. and states. The Vermont Smart Growth Collaborative Sprawl vs. Smart Growth: (VSGC), a coalition of ten nonprofit organiza- Costs and Benefits tions, was concerned that state and local policies While there are varying definitions of sprawl 10 Summer 2004 awlvs. The Power of the Public Purse include an allowance of and personal items, but state. For example, New homestead exemption, estead is exempt, regard- and smart growth (see sidebar on page 15), there and reducing the ability to walk to schools, are several generally accepted features that distin- libraries, stores, and jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide
    Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide STUDY PREPARED BY CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY RESEARCH EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN SCHOOL OF PLANNING & PUBLIC POLICY RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY with the participation of THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SMART GROWTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND and SCHOOR DEPALMA MANALAPAN, NEW JERSEY STUDY PREPARED FOR NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (NJDCA) DIVISION OF CODES AND STANDARDS and NEW JERSEY MEADOWLANDS COMMISSION (NJMC) NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF SMART GROWTH (NJOSG) June, 2006 DRAFT—NOT FOR QUOTATION ii CONTENTS Part One: Introduction and Synthesis of Findings and Recommendations Chapter 1. Smart Growth and Infill: Challenge, Opportunity, and Best Practices……………………………………………………………...…..2 Part Two: Infill Development Standards and Policy Guide Section I. General Provisions…………………….…………………………….....33 II. Definitions and Development and Area Designations ………….....36 III. Land Acquisition………………………………………………….……40 IV. Financing for Infill Development ……………………………..……...43 V. Property Taxes……………………………………………………….....52 VI. Procedure………………………………………………………………..57 VII. Design……………………………………………………………….…..68 VIII. Zoning…………………………………………………………………...79 IX. Subdivision and Site Plan…………………………………………….100 X. Documents to be Submitted……………………………………….…135 XI. Design Details XI-1 Lighting………………………………………………….....145 XI-2 Signs………………………………………………………..156 XI-3 Landscaping…………………………………………….....167 Part Three: Background on Infill Development: Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing and Smart Growth Making the Connection
    Affordable Housing and Smart Growth Making the Connection National Neighborhood Coalition Principal Author Danielle Arigoni Publisher National Neighborhood Coalition Copyeditor Robin Surratt Design Eastern Research Group Layout Janice Clark Printing Doyle Printing For additional copies of this report, contact the Environmental Protection Agency’s Development, Community, and Environment Division at 202-260-2750. AFFORDABLE HOUSING and SMART GROWTH Making the Connection A PUBLICATION OF THE SMART GROWTH NETWORK SUBGROUP ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING Members American Planning Association Enterprise Foundation Environmental Law Institute Fannie Mae Housing Assistance Council International City/County Management Association Local Initiatives Support Corporation National Congress for Community and Economic Development National Housing Institute National Low Income Housing Coalition National Neighborhood Coalition Northeast-Midwest Institute Smart Growth America U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Urban Land Institute Washington, D.C. 2001 National Neighborhood Coalition Affordable Housing Subgroup Convenors Smart Growth Network In 1996, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency joined with several non-profit and government organizations to form the Smart Growth Network (SGN). The Network was formed in response to increasing community concerns about the need for new ways to grow that boost the economy, protect the environment, and enhance community vitality. The Network's partners include environmental groups, historic preservation organizations, professional
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth and Economic Success: Investing in Infill Development
    United States February 2014 Environmental Protection www.epa.gov/smartgrowth Agency SMART GROWTH AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS: INVESTING IN INFILL DEVELOPMENT Office of Sustainable Communities Smart Growth Program Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Sustainable Communities with the assistance of Renaissance Planning Group and RCLCO under contract number EP-W-11-009/010/11. Christopher Coes (Smart Growth America); Alex Barron (EPA Office of Policy); Dennis Guignet and Robin Jenkins (EPA National Center for Environmental Economics); and Kathleen Bailey, Matt Dalbey, Megan Susman, and John Thomas (EPA Office of Sustainable Communities) provided editorial reviews. EPA Project Leads: Melissa Kramer and Lee Sobel Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. This paper is part of a series of documents on smart growth and economic success. Other papers in the series can be found at www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/economic_success.htm. Cover photos and credits: La Valentina in Sacramento, California, courtesy of Bruce Damonte; Small-lot infill in Washington, D.C., courtesy of EPA; The Fitzgerald in Baltimore, courtesy of The Bozzuto Group; and The Maltman Bungalows in Los Angeles, courtesy of Civic Enterprise Development. Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth Criteria Form
    SMART GROWTH PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ACT SMART GROWTH CRITERIA FORM Applicants must address how a particular Criterion is met or why it is not “relevant” to the proposed project. Applicants must show how facets of their project relate to the Criteria by noting “Yes:”, “No:”, or “NR:” (for Not Relevant) followed by a brief explanation. For a Project which does not satisfy Smart Growth criteria or compliance of the Project with such criteria is considered to be impracticable (a “No:” answer), sufficient information must be provided to support justification for approval of funding. Project Name: Project Number: Project Address: Applicant/Sponsor: Project Description: Criterion (1): “To advance projects for the use, maintenance or improvement of existing infrastructure.” Criterion (2): “To advance projects located in municipal centers.” 1 5/2019 Criterion (3): “To advance projects in developed areas or areas designated for concentrated infill development in a municipally approved comprehensive land use plan, local waterfront revitalization plan and/or brownfield opportunity area plan.” Criterion (4): “To protect, preserve and enhance the state’s resources, including agricultural land, forests, surface and groundwater, air quality, recreation and open space, scenic areas, and significant historic and archaeological resources.” Criterion (5): “To foster mixed land uses and compact development, downtown revitalization, brownfield redevelopment, the enhancement of beauty in public spaces, the diversity and affordability of housing in proximity
    [Show full text]
  • SMART GROWTH Fernando Costa, David Crossley, Mike Brennan, and Greg Baker
    SMART GROWTH Fernando Costa, David Crossley, Mike Brennan, and Greg Baker In recent years, the term "smart growth" has become increasingly popular as public officials around the country have sought long-term, sustainable solutions to the urgent social, economic, and environmental issues that face our cities and metropolitan areas. A wide variety of national organizations, ranging from the Sierra Club to the National Association of Home Builders, have adopted policy statements that explicitly favor some form of smart growth. From coast to coast, many states have provided leadership on growth management issues, even as they have reaffirmed that the responsibility for resolving those issues lies mainly at the local level. The American Planning Association will consider, at its Chicago Conference in April 2002, the following definition: Smart Growth is the planning, design and development and revitalization of our communities to promote community and equity, to create a sense of place and to preserve our natural as well as cultural resources. Smart Growth enhances _ecological integrity over both the short and long term, and improves quality of life for all by expanding the range of transportation, employment and housing choices in the region in a fiscally responsible manner. Source: Draft 4, Policy Guide on Smart Growth, September 7, 2001. Available on the APA website, www.planning.org; or from the APA's offices in Washington, D.C. In Texas, some municipalities have adopted smart growth as the theme for their efforts to revitalize distressed neighborhoods and control suburban sprawl. For example, the City of Austin has attracted national attention with its innovative Smart Growth Initiative, even hosting the Urban Land Institute's 1998 conference on smart growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Tent of Growth Management: Smart Growth As a Movement
    Policies for Managing Urban Growth and Landscape Change: A Key to Conservation in the 21st Century THE BIG TENT OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT: SMART GROWTH AS A MOVEMENT Edward G. Goetz1 ABSTRACT—Growth management policies in the U.S. have failed to gain significant political support in many regions, limiting efforts to manage development patterns and protect natural resources. The Smart Growth movement has brought new voices into the debate over growth management and has provided a “big tent” under which transportation groups, environmentalists, advocates for affordable housing, and neighborhood activists have combined efforts to affect land policy. Although this has broadened political support for growth management, the Smart Growth movement still faces impor- tant challenges in unifying and mobilizing its diverse constituency. Pinpointing the origins of the Smart Growth movement is dif- (NRDC) and the Surface Transportation Policy Project ficult. Some argue that Smart Growth stems from the entire (STPP) jointly developed what they called the Smart Growth history of growth management efforts, going back as far as the Toolkit to assist local and state governments in producing Supreme Court’s legitimization of zoning (Burchell et al. walkable and transit-accessible development. In 1996, the 2000). From this perspective, Smart Growth is merely a label U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) joined with for a repackaged assemblage of previous growth management nonprofit and government organizations to create the Smart techniques and is an evolutionary stage in the development of Growth Network (SGN). Members of the SGN include a growth management approaches. A competing perspective is range of interest groups concerned with issues that range that Smart Growth brings together existing strategies in a new from the environment and historic preservation to real estate way, under the banner of a different set of growth manage- development and transportation.
    [Show full text]