Understanding Trauma in Guatemala
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNDERSTANDING TRAUMA IN GUATEMALA: A CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF APPLIED AND PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY BY JEFFERY BUCHANAN BRAND IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY OCTOBER, 2015 APPROVED: ___________________________ Monica Indart, Psy.D. ___________________________ Dan Fishman, Ph.D. DEAN: ___________________________ Stan Messer, Ph.D. Copyright 2015 by Jeff Brand Abstract This study provides a qualitative analysis of how a sample of Guatemalan psychologists conceptualize and work with psychological trauma. Ten psychologists living and working in Guatemala completed semi-structured interviews developed by the researcher to investigate their conceptualization(s) and clinical experience of treating trauma. Participants also answered a brief demographic questionnaire about their clinical training and professional practice. Interviews were analyzed for themes, which were grouped into meta-themes around four main areas: re-experiencing memories, unformulated emotional distress, hyperarousal and loss of meaning/connection. Selected interviews were also analyzed holistically as “cases” to examine how the internal logic and assumptions of each perspective varied. Different conceptual models of trauma emerged, and given the diversity of ideas, it is not possible to talk about ideas of a “Guatemalan model” of trauma. While primary themes showed some similarities to occidental ideas, the research also reveals how different participants employ multiple different concepts, each with different organizing assumptions. This includes use of alternative therapies (i.e., energy-based therapies), spiritual elements, social psychologies and interpersonal perspectives. Established trauma concepts— such as PTSD— import their own organizing assumptions, which may or may not be consistent with the basic assumptions of different cultures. Participants’ ideas showcase how trauma concepts can evolve to become more culturally syntonic with different worldviews. An original theoretical framework is proposed for analyzing trauma concepts cross culturally. While the study of trauma may recognize common themes or similarities, cultural sensitivity requires greater awareness of philosophical differences. While not mutually exclusive, the professional mandate to provide evidence-based treatments may potentially come into conflict with the equally important mandate to provide culturally sensitive ii care. When it comes to treating trauma, pluralism in concepts proves indispensable if the field hopes to uphold its multicultural values. iii Acknowledgements Very often, a work upon completion can seem as if it stands alone. Certainly in the writing and the scholarship, one hopes that it has a coherence and an integrity that allows it to make its own contributions. In that way, it tends to focus on the outcome, even at the expense of knowing how it all came together. Without exaggeration, I see this work as fruit off the vine of everything I have ever learned. Certainly, it would have never been possible without the formative influence of Chris Latiolais, who deserves the credit for what I understand about philosophy. Any misunderstandings in this arena are sorely my own, as he remains a remarkable and wiling teacher. As a clinician, I owe so much to my professors at GSAPP, my supervisors, and my former colleagues at Catherine Freer Wilderness Therapy Programs. Monica Indart was a stabilizing force for this project as my dissertation chair, and Dan Fishman contributed with his insightful comments. Don Morgan lent a spark through personal introductions and his timely encouragement. Perhaps one of the most indispensable people in this project was Maria del Pilar Grazioso and the Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, to whom I owe a great debt of gratitude. There are a great many other people who deserve to be mentioned (in alphabetical order): Andres Consoli, Nick Copeland, Angelina Snodgrass Godoy, Finn Kjaerulf, John Linstroth, Jimmy Reyna, Elizabeth Rohr, Celines Villalba and Erika Wassell— each of whom contributed in unique and important ways. On a very personal level, I want to express my heartfelt thanks to all of the participants in this study who took the time to share their thoughts with me. You have taught me so much, and please know that I did my best to represent your words and thoughts with the same respect and admiration that I hold for each of you. I want to thank Dan Braman, Mariana Torres-Viso, and "the Council” for their support as colleagues and friends. To my family, I love you very much and I hope you take a feeling of pride in this effort, iv knowing that it would never have come to be without your support both in my life and during this long, winding process. I want to recognize the people of Guatemala who have suffered so much and yet still find strength and beauty in their lives— a testament to resilience that I hope is represented here. And lastly, I dedicate this work to Kate, for all the reasons that you know and because there are so many things we will never know. v Table of Contents Page Abstract ......................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments......................................................................................................iv Table of Contents ......................................................................................................v List of Tables .............................................................................................................viii Chapter Introduction ...........................................................................................1 I. History of Trauma & PTSD ..................................................................16 History of PTSD ...................................................................................30 II. Research Review of PTSD....................................................................42 Review of Clinical Interventions ..........................................................60 III. Constructive Criticism of the PTSD Diagnosis and Revisions to the DSM 5 .................................................................74 Empirical Foundations ..........................................................................84 Heterogeneity ................................................................................87 Dimensionality .......................................................................93 IV. Paradigmatic Criticism of the PTSD Diagnosis and Trans-Cultural Psychiatry ..............................................................99 V. Core Conceptual Assumptions of Trauma Concepts: A Theoretical Framework .....................................................................121 Question of Reference...........................................................................126 Question of Suffering ....................................................................133 Question of Etiology ..............................................................143 vi Question of Response ...................................................152 Interlocking Issues ...............................................158 VI. Implications of A Post-Modern Perspective on Trauma ......................162 VII. An Introduction to Guatemala, Its People and Its Cultures ..................184 VIII. Research Methods .................................................................................215 Recruitment and Data Collection ..........................................................214 Development of Research Methods ..............................................219 Data Analysis .........................................................................221 IX. An Analysis of Themes .........................................................................225 Sample Characteristics ..........................................................................225 Professional Practice .....................................................................226 Trauma Concepts ...................................................................234 Clinical Intervention .....................................................242 X. Analysis of “Cases”: Examples of Diverse Trauma Concepts .............251 Case 05 ..................................................................................................251 Case 03 ..........................................................................................258 Case 09 ...................................................................................266 XI. An Integrated Analysis: Perspectives on Context & Development ......279 XII. Discussion .............................................................................................293 Reviewing & Understanding the Results ..............................................293 Cross-Cultural Perspectives & Integrating Science .......................298 Hypotheses on Cross Cultural Practice ..................................305 Alternative Explanations, Implications & Anticipated Criticism ...............................................320 vii Limitations & Future Research ...........................328 Conclusion ............................................................................................333 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................341