DOCSLIB.ORG

A Community Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Community Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 FINAL EVALUATION Our Country, Our Future: A Community Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 Lead Evaluator: SFCG Regional Design, Monitoring & Evaluation Associate Olivia Russell Research Team: SFCG-Burundi DM&E Assistant Janvier Ndagijimana Data collected: August 2016 Floride Ahitungiye Adrienne Lemon Country Director Senior DM&E Regional Specialist Search for Common Ground Search for Common Ground 32, Avenue Kunkiko, Rohero II 32, Avenue Kunkiko, Rohero II Bujumbura, Burundi Bujumbura, Burundi +257 22 219696 +257 22241946 [email protected] Search for Common Ground | [email protected] Final Evaluation: Our Country, Our Future: A Community 2 Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 3 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 Project background ................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4 Limitations ................................................................................................................................. 5 Key Findings .............................................................................................................................. 5 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 8 1. Background Information ....................................................................................................... 10 About Search for Common Ground ...................................................................................... 10 Project Overview ..................................................................................................................... 10 2. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 12 Evaluation Objectives ............................................................................................................. 12 Data Collection and Analysis ................................................................................................. 12 Limitations ............................................................................................................................... 15 3. Findings .................................................................................................................................... 16 Contextual dynamics ............................................................................................................... 16 Effectiveness ............................................................................................................................. 22 Impact ....................................................................................................................................... 45 Sustainability ........................................................................................................................... 51 4. Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 53 5. Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 55 6. Appendices ............................................................................................................................... 57 Final Evaluation: Our Country, Our Future: A Community 3 Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi Acknowledgements First and foremost, this evaluation would not have been possible without the engagement and insights provided by the participants and non-participants who dedicated their time and energy to take part in the survey, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews. A special thanks to the research team for all of their hard work and dedication during the final evaluation process: Goreth Kamikazi, Désiré Nsanzamahoro, Christa Nkurunziza, and Arcade Habiyambere. Many thanks to SFCG-Burundi DM&E Assistant Janvier Ndagijimana who managed all logistics as well as translated and co-facilitated the focus group discussions and key informant interviews. His energy, dedication and attention to detail were key ingredients to the success of the planning and data collection processes. Thanks to SFCG-Burundi M&E Coordinator Dieudonné Murangamizwa for his guidance and input as well. The time, energy and many insights of SFCG staff members and partner organizations were also greatly appreciated. Abbreviations CSO U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations FGD Focus Group Discussion ILT Institutional Learning Team KII Key Informant Interview MSC Mixed Security Committees OMAC L'Organisation des médias d'Afrique centrale PTI Partners Trust International (PTI) RFI Radio France Internationale RPA Radio Public Africain RTNB Radio Télévision National du Burundi SFCG Search for Common Ground VOA Voice of America Final Evaluation: Our Country, Our Future: A Community 4 Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi Executive Summary Project background The project “Our Country, Our Future: A Community Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi” was implemented by Search for Common Ground (SFCG), in collaboration with Partners Trust International (PTI) and L'Organisation des médias d'Afrique centrale (OMAC). The project was funded by the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations (CSO) with the goal to support local communities to reduce the risk of conflict escalation leading up to, during, and following the election period in Burundi. Project activities were implemented over 19 months in line with the project’s two specific objectives: 1. Support key individuals and community networks to de-escalate disputes; and 2. Foster a national environment favorable to non-violent expression, tolerance of political differences, and inclusive dialogue. Methodology The final evaluation was conducted in August 2016 by an internal evaluation team. Following a document review, data was collected in all five intervention provinces: Bujumbura Mairie, Bujumbura Rural, Bubanza, Kirundo and Makamba. Data was collected in two communes in each province. Key informant interviews (KII) and surveys were conducted in both communes, while focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in just one. In total, the evaluation team conducted 20 focus groups (73 women and 70 men), 20 key informant interviews (8 women and 12 men), and 520 surveys (283 women and 237 men). Finally, as the baseline was conducted via SMS, indicator progress was confirmed in this report using baseline data and data collected in the June 2016 SMS report. Data from the final evaluation surveys, FGDs and KIIs mentioned above were used to contextualize and deepen understanding of this progress and overall project impact. This final evaluation had three key objectives: 1. Internal and External Context Analysis: How the program was affected by both internal and external factors, and strategies used to respond to the changing context. 2. Progress towards results: A full review of the project outcome and output indicators to date, and comparison with baseline indicators to measure the change brought about by the project. Final Evaluation: Our Country, Our Future: A Community 5 Empowerment Approach for Non-Violence in Burundi 3. Lessons Learned and Recommendations: Lessons learned from the program and recommendations for the development of future initiatives to support inclusive dialogue and tolerance in the Burundian context. Limitations Key limitations of the evaluation were linked to data representativeness and participant confidence level. While survey data was collected in 10 communes, FGDs took place in only five (one in each province). Therefore, the FGD data may not fully represent the provinces of intervention. 520 surveys were conducted in total, allowing for a 95% confidence level with a 10% margin of error in all five provinces. Additionally, due to the sensitivity of questions, some respondents (in FGDs, KIIs and surveys) were hesitant to respond or give full responses. Key Findings Overall, the evaluation found that the project was effective in supporting local communities to reduce the risk of conflict escalation leading up to, during, and following the election period in Burundi. This was accomplished, despite a challenging and changing implementing environment, by providing key individuals with new skills to de-escalate disputes, as well as providing spaces for inclusive dialogue and building skills in non-violent expression which enhanced political tolerance. The commitment to conflict resolution and tolerance at the individual level and capacities built within partner organizations suggests sustainability of the project results. Contextual dynamics 2015 was a tumultuous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: the Last Situation Report Was Dated November 18, 2002
    U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT BUREAU FOR DEMOCRACY, CONFLICT, AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE (DCHA) OFFICE OF U.S. FOREIGN DISASTER ASSISTANCE (OFDA) BURUNDI – Complex Emergency Situation Report #2, Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 March 25, 2003 Note: The last situation report was dated November 18, 2002. BACKGROUND The Tutsi minority, which represents 14 percent of Burundi’s 6.85 million people, has dominated the country politically, militarily, and economically since national independence in 1962. Approximately 85 percent of Burundi’s population is Hutu, and approximately one percent is Twa (Batwa). The current cycle of violence began in October 1993 when members within the Tutsi-dominated army assassinated the first freely elected President, Melchoir Ndadaye (Hutu), sparking Hutu-Tutsi fighting. Ndadaye’s successor, Cyprien Ntariyama (Hutu), was killed in a plane crash on April 6, 1994, alongside Rwandan President Habyarimana. Sylvestre Ntibantunganya (Hutu) took power and served as President until July 1996, when a military coup d’etat brought current President Pierre Buyoya (Tutsi) to power. Since 1993, an estimated 300,000 Burundians have been killed. In August 2000, nineteen Burundian political parties signed the Peace and Reconciliation Agreement in Arusha, Tanzania, overseen by peace process facilitator, former South African President Nelson Mandela. The Arusha Peace Accords include provisions for an ethnically balanced army and legislature, and for democratic elections to take place after three years of transitional government. The three-year transition period began on November 1, 2001. President Pierre Buyoya is serving as president for the first 18 months of the transition period, to be followed in May 2003 by a Hutu president for the final 18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION REPORT 9 – 15 July 2007
    SITUATION REPORT 9 – 15 July 2007 UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES Office for the Coordination of Bureau de Coordination des Humanitarian Affairs in Burundi Affaires Humanitaires au Burundi http://ochaonline.un.org/Burundi http://ochaonline.un.org/Burundi ACTIVITIES AND UPDATES Update on repatriation Last week, UNHCR reported the return of 840 Burundian refugees who arrived from Tanzania through the entry points of Kobero / Muyinga province (182), Gisuru /Ruyigi province (248) and Mabanda / Makamba province (410). This is the first repatriation which has taken place since new measures to promote the return of Burundians from northwestern camps in Tanzania were announced. Nonetheless, statistics of previous years reveal that the present increase in the number of returnees is normal during this time of the year. Since the beginning of the UNHCR facilitated repatriation process in April 2002, the number of returnees normally starts increasing from May and peaks in August due to the end of the school year and harvests. The impact of the cash grant programme will be better evaluated through returnee caseloads starting from late September. During the period under review, 462 DRC refugees were transferred from Bujumbura to Musasa transit center (Ngozi province). To date, the total number of DRC refugees transferred to Gasorwe refugee camp and Musasa transit center in 2007 is 4,287. Update on Burundians expelled from Tanzania Expelled persons continue to arrive from Tanzania. During the reporting week, the Government project for the reintegration of war-affected persons (PARESI) registered 414 persons (205 families) expelled from Tanzania: 356 at the entry point of Kobero (Muyinga) and 58 in Mishiha (Cankuzo).
    [Show full text]
  • MFADC-MAGAZINE Nr 132 of 02Nd July 2021 Presentation of Credentials: Bangladesh Opens Its Representation in Burundi
    REPUBLIC OF BURUNDI MFADC-MAGAZINE Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Development Cooperation Nr 132 of 02nd July 2021 Burundi celebrates 59th anniversary of independence Summary: page Burundi celebrates 59th The ceremonies anniversary of indepen- continued at dence 1 Independence Square where Presentation of Creden- the Presidential tials: Bangladesh opens its representation in Couple and the 2 Dean of the Burundi diplomatic corps The First Lady takes also laid part in the annual Bu- wreaths of rundi Summit of the 3 flowers. The MERCK Foundation actual ceremo- 2021 nies took place at the Independence Launch of national con- n July 1st of each year, Burundi Boulevard, near the Intwari stadium, in sultations on food sys- celebrates its independence. tems 5 O the town hall of Bujumbura. The 59th anniversary ceremonies, 2021 edition, were enhanced by the Head of After the troops were reviewed by the Head of State, a long, colorful parade Opening of the diploma- State, His Excellency Evariste NDAYIS- tic week 2021 edition HIMIYE, accompanied by the First Lady followed. The ceremonies were also 6 livened up by the Burundian drum, the of Burundi, Her Excellency Angeline NDAYISHIMIYE, and many other autho- Intore dancers of Kirundo, the pa- UNITED NATIONS MUL- ratroopers, and military and police TIDIMENSIONAL INTE- rities of the country and the foreign de- GRATED MISSION FOR legations, headed by the President of games in order to prove that the coun- STABILIZATION IN THE try can count on its sons and daugh- CENTRAL AFRICAN 8 the Central African Republic, His Excel- ters to ensure the internal security of REPUBLIC (MINUSCA): lency Faustin Archange TOUADERA.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/WGEID/118/1 Advance Edited Version
    A/HRC/WGEID/118/1 Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 30 July 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Communications transmitted, cases examined, observations made and other activities conducted by the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances* 118th session (13–22 May 2019) I. Communications 1. Between its 117th and 118th sessions, the Working Group transmitted 50 cases under its urgent action procedure, to: Bangladesh (3), Burundi (3), Egypt (19), India (1), Libya (1), Pakistan (11), Russian Federation (1), Saudi Arabia (1), Sudan (1), Syrian Arab Republic (2), Turkey (6) and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) (1). 2. At its 118th session, the Working Group decided to transmit 172 newly reported cases of enforced disappearance to 19 States: Algeria (5), Burundi (31), Cameroon (1), China (20), Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (14), Egypt (2), Eritrea (1), India (17), Iran (Islamic Republic of) (4), Libya (2), Mexico (2), Pakistan (12), Republic of Korea (1), Saudi Arabia (2), Sri Lanka (45), Syrian Arab Republic (10), Tunisia (1) United Arab Emirates (1) and Yemen (1). 3. The Working Group clarified 62 cases, in: Azerbaijan (1), Bangladesh (2), China (1), Egypt (39), Morocco (4), Nigeria (2), Pakistan (3), Saudi Arabia (3), Syrian Arab Republic (1), Thailand (1) Turkey (4) and Ukraine (1). A total of 50 cases were clarified on the basis of information provided by the Governments and 12 on the basis of information provided by sources. 4. Between its 117th
    [Show full text]
  • The Burundi Peace Process
    ISS MONOGRAPH 171 ISS Head Offi ce Block D, Brooklyn Court 361 Veale Street New Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa Tel: +27 12 346-9500 Fax: +27 12 346-9570 E-mail: [email protected] Th e Burundi ISS Addis Ababa Offi ce 1st Floor, Ki-Ab Building Alexander Pushkin Street PEACE CONDITIONAL TO CIVIL WAR FROM PROCESS: THE BURUNDI PEACE Peace Process Pushkin Square, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Th is monograph focuses on the role peacekeeping Tel: +251 11 372-1154/5/6 Fax: +251 11 372-5954 missions played in the Burundi peace process and E-mail: [email protected] From civil war to conditional peace in ensuring that agreements signed by parties to ISS Cape Town Offi ce the confl ict were adhered to and implemented. 2nd Floor, Armoury Building, Buchanan Square An AU peace mission followed by a UN 160 Sir Lowry Road, Woodstock, South Africa Tel: +27 21 461-7211 Fax: +27 21 461-7213 mission replaced the initial SA Protection Force. E-mail: [email protected] Because of the non-completion of the peace ISS Nairobi Offi ce process and the return of the PALIPEHUTU- Braeside Gardens, Off Muthangari Road FNL to Burundi, the UN Security Council Lavington, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 386-1625 Fax: +254 20 386-1639 approved the redeployment of an AU mission to E-mail: [email protected] oversee the completion of the demobilisation of ISS Pretoria Offi ce these rebel forces by December 2008. Block C, Brooklyn Court C On 18 April 2009, at a ceremony to mark the 361 Veale Street ON beginning of the demobilisation of thousands New Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa DI Tel: +27 12 346-9500 Fax: +27 12 460-0998 TI of PALIPEHUTU-FNL combatants, Agathon E-mail: [email protected] ON Rwasa, leader of PALIPEHUTU-FNL, gave up AL www.issafrica.org P his AK-47 and military uniform.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi : Analyse Des Facteurs De Risques, Évaluation Des Dommages Et Propositions Pour Un Relèvement Et Une Reconstruction Durables
    Burundi : analyse des facteurs de risques, évaluation des dommages et propositions pour un relèvement et une reconstruction durables Evaluation rapide conjointe suite à la catastrophe des 9-10 février 2014 aux alentours de Bujumbura Bare soil denuded by flash flooding Illustration 1. (page de couverture) Vue satellite en date du 14 février 2014 (image Pléiades © CNES 2013) traitée par UNITAR/UNOSAT et photo du 6 mars 2014, montrant les effets de la crue rapide au niveau du quartier de Gatunguru, Commune de Kinama Suite à la mission d’évaluation des dommages du 3 au 14 mars 2014, le gouvernement du Burundi avec l’appui de ses partenaires techniques et financiers a développé ce rapport en trois sections : 1. « Analyse des facteurs de risques et caractérisation de l’événement », 2. « Evaluation des dommages causés aux infrastructures économiques et sociales » et enfin 3. « Priorités pour un relèvement et une reconstruction résilients ». Neuf groupes de travail, listés en page 2 du résumé exécutif, ont contribué au développement de ce rapport, imprimé à Washington, DC, USA, le 14 avril 2014. Crédits photo : Joachim Kagari, Régie de production et de distribution d’eau et d’électricité (REGIDESO) Mehdi Bouhlel, secrétariat technique du Projet de Développement du Secteur Routier (PDSR) Francois Nkurunziza, secrétariat technique du Projet de Travaux Publics et de Création d’Emplois (PTPCE) Dieudonné Buyoya, Fonds des Nations Unies pour l’enfance (UNICEF) Jean-Baptiste Migraine, Banque mondiale Cartes développées par l’IGEBU (sur fond topographique IGN 1982) et le Bureau d’étude CIRA (sur fond Google, dans le cadre de l’Etude sur la collecte des eaux pluviales).
    [Show full text]
  • Political-Chronicles-2019.Pdf
    Great Lakes of Africa Centre | Centre pour l’Afrique des grands lacs Lange Sint Annastraat 7 2000 Antwerp | Anvers - Belgium | Belgique Tel: +32 3 265 57 70 Web: www.uantwerpen.be/glac The Great Lakes of Africa Centre is part of the Institute of Development Policy, University of Antwerp Le Centre pour l’Afrique des Grands Lacs fait partie de l’Institut de politique du développement, Université d’Anvers Great Lakes of Africa Centre great lakes of africa centre • centre pour l’afrique des grand lacs POLITICAL CHRONICLES OF THE AFRICAN GREAT LAKES REGION 2019 CHRONIQUES POLITIQUES DE L’AFRIQUE DES GRANDS LACS 2019 Edited by | sous la direction de F. Reyntjens The Chronicles are a peer reviewed publication. Les Chroniques sont une publication à comité de lecture. Lay-out and cover | Mise en page et couverture: Joëlle Dhondt © 2020 Uitgeverij UPA (University Press Antwerp) UPA is een imprint van ASP nv (Academic and Scientific Publishers nv) Keizerslaan 34 1000 Brussel Tel. + 32 (0)2 289 26 50 Fax + 32 (0)2 289 26 59 e-mail: [email protected] www.aspeditions.be ISBN 978 90 5718 972 2 La dénomination GPRC (Guaranteed Peer Reviewed Content) est développée par l’institution flamande Boek.be. Elle est attribuée aux publications conformes aux standards académiques de la VABB (Vlaams Academisch Bibliografisch Bestand). The Authors | Les Auteurs v THE AUTHORS | LES AUTEURS Ivan teaching assistant and PhD candidate, Institute of ASHABA Development Policy (IOB), University of Antwerp, [email protected] Réginas assistant d’enseignement et chercheur
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    REPUBLIQUE DU BURUNDI MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DE L’AGRICULTURE ET DE L’ELEVAGE Office Burundais pour la Protection de l’Environnement __________________________________________________ SIXIEME RAPPORT DU BURUNDI A LA CONVENTION SUR LA DIVERSITE BIOLOGIQUE Bujumbura, décembre 2018 TABLE DES MATIERES Acronymes et abréviations .............................................................................................................. ii Partie I. Informations sur les objectifs poursuivis au niveau national ....................................... 1 Partie II. Mesures de mise en œuvre prises, évaluation de leur efficacité, obstacles et besoins scientifiques et techniques connexes pour pouvoir atteindre les objectifs nationaux ....................................................................................................................... 12 Partie III. Evaluation des progrès accomplis dans la réalisation de chaque objectif national ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Partie IV. Description de la contribution nationale à la réalisation de chaque objectif d’Aichi pour la biodiversité mondiale ..................................................................................... 77 Partie V. Description de la contribution nationale à la réalisation des objectifs de la stratégie mondiale pour la conservation des plantes (cette partie du rapport est facultative) .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
    Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Canada.ca Services Departments Français Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Refugee Claims Refugee Appeals Admissibility Hearings Detention Reviews HomeImmigrationResearch Appeals Program Responses to Information Requests National Responses to Information Requests Documentation Packages Recent Research Responses to Information Requests (RIR) respond to focused Requests for Information that are submitted to the Research Directorate in the course of the Responses to refugee protection determination process. The database contains a seven-year Information Requests archive of English and French RIRs. Earlier RIRs may be found on the UNHCR's Refworld website. Please note that some RIRs have attachments which are not electronically accessible. To obtain a PDF copy of an RIR attachment, please email the Knowledge and Information Management Unit. 15 September 2016 BDI105629.E Burundi: List of all the neighbourhoods of Bujumbura, including the ethnicity and socio-economic status of the inhabitants of those neighbourhoods (2014- September 2016) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa 1. Lists of Neighbourhoods in Bujumbura Sources indicate that a 2014 law on the reorganization of the communes within Bujumbura city reduced the number of communes to 3 (IGIHE 28 Aug. 2014; Burundi AGnews 18 Dec. 2014; Radio Isanganiro 28 Aug. 2014) from 13 (ibid.; Burundi AGnews 18 Dec. 2014). The three communes are Muha, Mukaza, and Ntahangwa (ibid.; Radio Isanganiro 28 Aug. 2014; IGIHE 28 Aug. 2014). Sources indicate that each of the communes are further divided as follows: 1. Muha Kanyosha Kinindo Musaga 2. Mukaza Buyenzi Bwiza Nyakabiga Rohero 3. Ntahangwa http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/Eng/ResRec/RirRdi/Pages/index.aspx?doc=456689&pls=1[11/3/2016 10:53:40 AM] Responses to Information Requests - Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada Cibitoke Kamenge Gihosha Ngagara Kinama Buterere (ibid.; Burundi AGnews 18 Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • BURUNDI: Carte De Référence
    BURUNDI: Carte de référence 29°0'0"E 29°30'0"E 30°0'0"E 30°30'0"E 2°0'0"S 2°0'0"S L a c K i v u RWANDA Lac Rweru Ngomo Kijumbura Lac Cohoha Masaka Cagakori Kiri Kiyonza Ruzo Nzove Murama Gaturanda Gatete Kayove Rubuga Kigina Tura Sigu Vumasi Rusenyi Kinanira Rwibikara Nyabisindu Gatare Gakoni Bugabira Kabira Nyakarama Nyamabuye Bugoma Kivo Kumana Buhangara Nyabikenke Marembo Murambi Ceru Nyagisozi Karambo Giteranyi Rugasa Higiro Rusara Mihigo Gitete Kinyami Munazi Ruheha Muyange Kagugo Bisiga Rumandari Gitwe Kibonde Gisenyi Buhoro Rukungere NByakuizu soni Muvyuko Gasenyi Kididiri Nonwe Giteryani 2°30'0"S 2°30'0"S Kigoma Runyonza Yaranda Burara Nyabugeni Bunywera Rugese Mugendo Karambo Kinyovu Nyabibugu Rugarama Kabanga Cewe Renga Karugunda Rurira Minyago Kabizi Kirundo Rutabo Buringa Ndava Kavomo Shoza Bugera Murore Mika Makombe Kanyagu Rurende Buringanire Murama Kinyangurube Mwenya Bwambarangwe Carubambo Murungurira Kagege Mugobe Shore Ruyenzi Susa Kanyinya Munyinya Ruyaga Budahunga Gasave Kabogo Rubenga Mariza Sasa Buhimba Kirundo Mugongo Centre-Urbain Mutara Mukerwa Gatemere Kimeza Nyemera Gihosha Mukenke Mangoma Bigombo Rambo Kirundo Gakana Rungazi Ntega Gitwenzi Kiravumba Butegana Rugese Monge Rugero Mataka Runyinya Gahosha Santunda Kigaga Gasave Mugano Rwimbogo Mihigo Ntega Gikuyo Buhevyi Buhorana Mukoni Nyempundu Gihome KanabugireGatwe Karamagi Nyakibingo KIRUCNanika DGaOsuga Butahana Bucana Mutarishwa Cumva Rabiro Ngoma Gisitwe Nkorwe Kabirizi Gihinga Miremera Kiziba Muyinza Bugorora Kinyuku Mwendo Rushubije Busenyi Butihinda
    [Show full text]
  • E-403 Public Disclosure Authorized
    E-403 Public Disclosure Authorized ` \ I .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized r ei- P . ' . 'f~~~~~~~ ,i Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIQUEDU BURUNDI Ministère des Finances Project des Travaux Publics et de Création d'Emplois .~ * p 54_~~~~~~~~ `, Etude d'une méthodologie d'évaluation de l'impact du Project des Travaux Publics et de Créationd'Emplois sur l'environnement RAPPORTPROVISOIRE HYDROPLAN Mai 2000 Ingenieur-GesellschaftmbH M i2 0 Etude d'une méthodologie d'evaluation de l'impact du Projet des Travaux Pubics et de Création d'Emplois sur l'environnement Page 1 TABLE DE MATIERES Pages RESUME 1 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Contexte et cadre de l'étude d'une méthodologie pour étude d'impact sur l'environnement du Projet des Travaux Publics et de Création d'Emplois 3 1.2. Justification d'une étude d'impact environnemental pour le Projet de Travaux Publics et de Création d'Emplois. 3 1.3. Objectifs de l'étude. 4 2. Méthodologiepour conduireles études d'impact sur l'environnementdes projetsABURTIP. 5 2.1. Analyse du cadre institutionnel, juridique et réglementaire de la gestion de l'environnement au Burundi. 5 2.1.1. Cadre institutionnel. 5 2.1.2. Cadre juridique et réglementaire. 5 2.1.3. Résumé des principaux textes régissant la gestion de l'environnement au Burundi. 6 2.1.3.1. Code de l'environnement. 6 2.1.3.2. Document de Politique Sectorielle du Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement. 7 2.1.3.3. Documents de la stratégie nationale de l'Environnement et plan d'action: 8 A) Diagnostic g B) Stratégie 10 C) Plan d'action environnemental (PAE).
    [Show full text]
  • (Epoa) Burundi: Floods and Landslides April 2021
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Burundi: Floods and Landslides April 2021 DREF Operation n° MDRBI018 Glide n°: -- Date of issue: 30 April 2021 Expected timeframe: 3 months Expected end date: 31 July 2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 468,259 Total number of people at 8,611 households Number of people to 2,153 households risk: 47,362 people be assisted: 11,840 people Provinces at risk: Rumonge, Makamba in the Provinces targeted: 3 provinces MAKAMBA, Nyanza-Lac Commune, RUMONGE, BUJUMBURA Bujumbura Capital and Bujumbura Rural in the Mutimbuzi Commune in the zone of the Gatumba and Rukaramu Host National Society presence: Burundi Red Cross with 18 Branches and more than 600.000 Volunteers Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: IFRC, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Belgian Red Cross French, Finnish Red Cross and ICRC Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Civil Department of Burundi Government, National Platform of Disaster Risk Management, UNOCHA, UNFPA A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster Lake Tanganyika water level have been rising since February 2021. Heavy rainfall since the start of April has worsened the situation with further rainfall predicted until mid-May. As of 19 April 2021, the level of Lake Tanganyika stood at 776.4 metres above sea level compared to the normal average level of 772.7 metres. From April 12, 2021 in the province of Rumonge households near the shores were flooded. In parts of the lakes, it reported the coastline has expanded 300 to 500m.
    [Show full text]