Engineering Failure Analysis 84 (2018) 131–138

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Engineering Failure Analysis 84 (2018) 131–138 Engineering Failure Analysis 84 (2018) 131–138 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Engineering Failure Analysis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/engfailanal The finite element analysis of collapse loads of single-spanned historic masonry arch bridges (Ordu, Sarpdere Bridge) T ⁎ Abdulkadir Cüneyt Aydina, , Suat Gökhan Özkayab a Atatürk University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering, 25030 Erzurum, Turkey b Ardahan University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering, 75000 Ardahan, Turkey ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The current methods used in estimating the collapse loads of masonry arch bridges have been Masonry arch bridges examined, and a study has been made aiming the calculation of the behaviors of the single- Collapse loads spanned masonry arch bridges shows under certain loads with the method of static analysis. Finite elements The model used for the study was 3D formed with the ANSYS package program, and the Static analysis results of the analysis were achieved using this program, as well. The model that was created was obtained by using the original dimensions of the historical Sarpdere Bridge located within the province of Ordu. The results obtained have shown compliance with the existing studies in the literature. In addition, the effects of the loads on the bridge that were applied to the different places on the system were examined, and the behaviors of the single-span masonry arch bridges under the loads applied were evaluated. The filler and sidewalls on left and right sides of the arch bridge were differentiated the loading about 10%. 1. Introduction Historical structures are one of the most essential parts of the cultural heritage. Historical monuments are the witnesses of our old traditions and the symbols of the cultural identity. It is not possible to understand, interpret and retrace the period of civilization, without them. They represent the details related with the technology in design, material characteristics, workmanship, architectural features and spiritual value of their periods. Actually, there exist only two basic ways to bring the past into today's world; literature and historical structures. These are remarked as the living history, on which human beings past is reflected, it will not be wrong to say that they are the proof's showing the spirit and charm of the heritage. Conservation and restoration of historical structures require a sensitive systematic study in order to achieve proper results. In addition to a deep knowledge of the ethics of conservation, one should have good technical skills and sufficient information related to the structure and material. This means that specialized people who take the necessary education should perform the conservation of historical structures. As well, conservation requires not only a multidisciplinary work, including history, but also architecture and engineering as the basic sciences. For proper intervention, understanding of the structural behavior and good engineering judgment with sufficient experience of the old construction techniques and concepts and correct interpretation of the analysis results of comprehensive structural analyses are needed. The master historical structures was designed not only for complex load carrying system and continuous interaction of domes, vaults, arches, minarets and pillars, but also for architectural concepts and for enough light and proper acoustics. [3,9,25]. ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (A.C. Aydin). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.002 Received 1 June 2017; Received in revised form 17 October 2017; Accepted 6 November 2017 Available online 07 November 2017 1350-6307/ © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. A.C. Aydin, S.G. Özkaya Engineering Failure Analysis 84 (2018) 131–138 Fig. 1. Plastic stress-strain diagram. Fig. 2. Sarpdere Bridge [1]. Fig. 3. Longitudinal and transverse appearances of the Sarpdere Bridge. 132 A.C. Aydin, S.G. Özkaya Engineering Failure Analysis 84 (2018) 131–138 Fig. 4. Three dimensional finite element model of Sarpdere Bridge. Linear load chart 45 41.2 40 41.5 40.01 35 34.4 31.98 30 28.5 25 23.2 21.7 20 15 10 5 0 Maximum live linear load (t/m) Maximum -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Distance to the mid point of chart(m) Fig. 5. Linear load chart. Singular load chart 50 (11. Analysis) 40 (13. Analysis) 41.2 40.01 (9. Analysis) 30 31.98 (12. Analysis) ( 20) 23.2 10. Analysis Series1 21.7 Maximum live load (t) 10 0 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Distance to the mid point of arch Fig. 6. Singular load chart. Turkey (Anatolia) is also one of the most important regions about historical construction and stone masonry arch bridges due to the geographical location and rich cultural heritage. Unfortunately, although the Turkish stone arch bridges have been widely sprouted in Turkey and surroundings, studies related to these structures have been rare. Almost no studies in which engineering properties and structural analyses were discussed have been carried out. Being convenient to span large distances, arch form is generally subjected to compressive forces because of its geometric shape. Therefore, arch is among the most commonly utilized structural forms in masonry buildings. Even if many of the historical bridges have been exposed to the great earthquakes, they survived to the present day. The fact that the old masters made such enormous works without the knowledge of any engineering evokes admiration. The thing that first comes to mind is whether they had information related to how similar products in their hands had been made or would be made before they made them. Perhaps the old masters received inspiration from the nature while creating their works. Because, a similar form of the masonry bridges they designed in order to pass the gaps are shapes that already exists in nature [8,10–15,20,23]. The arching had been only possibility for long spanning construction units in stone. Especially, stone bridges had constituted prestige products in the group of early curved structures. From those bridges, only few remained to exist. Wars, floats, intemperies, earthquakes and other sources of casualty make the bridge structures, through centuries and millenniums disintegrate. Some of them installed on relatively active road itineraries would be repaired or reconstructed. Therefore, thousand years old stone arched bridges 133 A.C. Aydin, S.G. Özkaya Engineering Failure Analysis 84 (2018) 131–138 Maximum live load (100*MPa) 21.85 19.12 43.7 21.85 19.12 Area affected by distributed load (m2) Fig. 7. Distributed load graphic. Table 1 The material properties taken into consideration in theoretical analyses [3]. Material Elasticity module Poisson ratio Mass density (N/m2) (kg/m3) Stone arch 3.0E9 0.2 1600 Side walls 2.5E9 0.2 1400 Filler 1.5E9 0.25 1300 do not likely reflect the original shape. Still, they do exhibit, at least, the appearance of ancient taste. Before going to description of few exemplar cases, it should be again recalled that the curvilinearity is a feast to the eyes and the brain. The arch is the initial stage of this festivity [19]. The examples above and many more like these examples may have been a source of inspiration for the old masters regarding the different forms of the bridges both in terms of length and aesthetics. In order to determine whether the old masonry bridges are really required to be strengthened or not, the first task of us the engineers is to determine the critical loads that will give rise to collapse. The preservation of historical buildings is of growing interest in many countries worldwide. Scientists and engineers perform historical, archeological and in situ investigation to repair, maintain and extend its lifetime. The repair and maintenance of historical masonry structures, generally a structural intervention of the existing structure, are reasons for the need of better understanding of these structures. The basic question arises: What is the carrying capacity, serviceability and the safety degree of the structure before and after intervention? To answer this question is extremely difficult in case of masonry structures, because the determination of material and geometrical parameters is generally uncertain. The architectural design of those buildings lacked a structural design that took advantage of the material properties and that allowed appropriate links between image and construction to be taken into account. Indeed, a detailed evaluation of historical, cultural, architectural and structural aspects is required in order to make correct decisions ([10,18,25]). We encounter the formation of the computer models related to the experimental studies and investigation of the experiments made by comparing the results obtained from the model analysis and the test results. In the analysis of structures, strength, stiffness and stability characteristics are considered as the three main criteria. The structure should be strong enough to carry the imposed loads, including its self-weight. Large deflections and differential displacements should not occur in the structure, either locally or overall. In this respect, it is also important to know the load history of the structure also. Lack of information about the loading history, strength and stiffness characteristics of the structural materials reduce the accuracy and validity of the results obtained from the structural analysis. In addition, an exact structural analysis should take into account the crack patterns, the crushing phenomena and the actual deformations [2,25]. Before the start of the experimental studies, creating a computer modeling of the test assembly is advantageous. For example, the issues such as determination of the measurements and parameters belonging to the experiment mechanism and experiment samples, determination of the number of the test samples to be tested, determination of the critical points where data will be obtained during the experiment can be possible with finite-element modeling and the analysis of these models.
Recommended publications
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Arch Bridges in East Blacksea Region of Turkey and Effects of Infill Materials on a Sample Bridge
    Arch bridges in East Blacksea Region of Turkey and effects of infill materials on a sample bridge A. Ural and A. Doğangün Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey ABSTRACT: Arch bridges are one of the most invaluable historical heritages of almost all countries in the world. In Turkey, there are so many masonry arch bridges of different periods, which are protected by the state and have the status of “Cultural Heritage”. However, most of them have been suffered due to natural hazards like floods, earthquakes and time deformations etc. This paper presents the general characteristics of historical stone arch bridges located in the East Blacksea Region of Turkey and investigating the infill effects on the general behavior of a sample bridge with changing the infill and arch material parameters respectively. Finite element method is used for the case study and the model has been assumed as macro modeling proce- dure due to the excessive number of nodes. Obtained results from the analyses indicate that the infill strongly affects the general behavior of the stone arch bridge. 1 INTRODUCTION Anatolia (Turkey) has been hosted various civilizations throughout centuries and it has become one of the oldest settlements all over the world due to the geographical location. Thus, it has ac- commodated innumerable historical structures remain from the past civilizations. Stone arch bridges are one of the most invaluable historical structures between them. However, they have been frequently damaged or collapsed due to the natural disasters and also manmade damages. Stone arch bridges in Anatolia have generally not given the importance they deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Eastern Turkey
    S P I R I T U A L D I R E C T O R B I S H O P T E R R Y K E E EXPLORE EASTERN TURKEY T U R K E Y 2 8 A U G - 9 S E P 2 0 2 0 1 3 D 1 0 N ( 1 1 T O U R I N G D A Y S ) @Armenian (Main Office): 7 Armenian Street, Bible House #04--02, Singapore 179932 @Orchard: 14 Scotts Road, Far East Plaza #01-83, Singapore 228213 Tel: +65 6304 3762 I Email: [email protected] I Website: www.ibex.sg I TA(02822) SPIRITUAL DIRECTOR I ISTANBUL Bishop Terry Kee TRABZON G KARS H ERZURUM DOGUBEYAZIT F TURKEY E VAN C ADIYAMAN D MARDIN B ADANA URFA TARSUS ANTIOCH A Legend: A-I + Overnight Site to visit Domestic flight In 2009, The Right Reverend Terry *Map not drawn to scale. For information only. Kee succeeded Bishop John Tan as the second bishop of the Day 1 – Fri, 28 Aug Turkish coffee at a local coffee house Lutheran Church in Singapore SINGAPORE (at your own expense). Continue the since its separation from the Assemble at Changi Airport to begin your journey to Urfa. (B/L/D) Lutheran Church in Malaysia in journey to Turkey. 1997. Bishop Terry Kee was a Departure Flight: TK55 SIN-IST 2325-0525 Day 5 – Tue, 1 Sep ADIYAMAN former missionary to Thailand for Check-in starts from 8.30pm (Check-out in the morning) about 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAIN FEATURES of the SELJUK, the BEYLIK and the OTTOMAN BRIDGES of the TURKISH ANATOLIAN ARCHITECTURE from the XII Th to the XVI Th CENTURIES*
    THE MAIN FEATURES OF THE SELJUK, THE BEYLIK AND THE OTTOMAN BRIDGES OF THE TURKISH ANATOLIAN ARCHITECTURE FROM THE XII th TO THE XVI th CENTURIES* FÜGEN ~ LTER The period from the XII th to the XIV th centuries is generally ac- cepted to the period of the Turkish settlement in Anatolia. In which ever field they appear, the artistic products of this era should be evaluated in the light of various factors such as the social necessities, the diverse reli- gious and cultural infiuences, the existing artistic traditions and the artists responsible for the works themselves. The Turks had already adopted the Islamic culture and traditions when they started the settlement of Anatolia; here, they came across the well established centers of the Christian culture. The resulting interaction with the Byzantine and Armenian civilization had inevitable effects on the formation of the Turkish Anatolian art and led to a continual exchange of artists and artistic ideas. The political unity of Anatolia was not achieved in the sense we understand today during the early Turkish Anatolian period, which covers the time until the Ottoman domination. The Turkish culture was effective in an extensive geographical area extending from Iran, Iraq, Sy- da, Caucaus, Turkestan and even to India. Ali the new artistic products in Anatolia were infiuenced and enriched by the old Turkish and Islamic traditions, as well as by the local cultures. This extensive region was largerly under the dominion of the Seljuk empire; although some independant or semi-dependant political entities were also present, the characteristics of t ~ e art and culture were defined by a shared civilization with common beliefs and aims.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Sustainable Bridge Solutions History of Sustainable Bridge Solutions
    ProvisionalChapter chapter 1 History of Sustainable Bridge Solutions History of Sustainable Bridge Solutions Slawomir Karas Slawomir Karas Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/63461 Abstract The chapter is a voice in the discussion concerning sustainable bridge development. Nowadays, the term has rather been abused, and therefore the presented approach refers to these elements of design, construction and maintenance of bridges—with regard to their role in transport and social life—which have been present in bridge construction for a long time and can be easily incorporated into the concept of sustainable bridge construction. Sustainable development, sustainable construction and so on are multidimensional. In the considered bridge construction area, looking at construction processes as interfering with the environment and which could and should be restricted is a new element. Nevertheless, other proven constructional solutions and technologies are characterised by their reliability. Assuming that the constructed bridges are to serve the next two or three generations of users, we can try to extrapolate current technical conditions on the next 30 or 60 years, i.e., up to three generations. We can do it if we know and are able to critically assess the history of bridge construction. Following this reasoning, the history in question is referred to in this paper, although rather subjectively and with the omission of numerous important personalities and technologies as well as instructive failures due to the publishing limitations. Keywords: Bridges, History of Bridges, Aesthetics, Sustainability, Architecture 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Parks in Istanbul"
    "Best Parks in Istanbul" Created by: Cityseeker 6 Locations Bookmarked Gülhane Park "Historical, Charming Ottoman Park" Once the outer garden of Topkapı Palace and meant only for the royal court, the Gülhane Park today is a popular and bustling local park, ideal for that lazy weekend picnic. It is considered to be one of the oldest public parks in Istanbul. Beautiful panoramic views over the Golden Horn and Sea of Marmara can be enjoyed from the Set Üstü Çay Bahçesi on the by Gryffindor park's north-eastern edge. Alemdar Cadessi, Istanbul Yıldız Park "Peaceful Escape" Yildiz Park is a welcome break from the breakneck pace of the surrounding city. A relaxing and serene park in the middle of Istanbul, this space hosts a number of lakes, pavilions, green gardens and stunning views. This space was originally part of Yildiz Palace, but has since become its own entity. There is also a porcelain factory on the grounds, by Public Domain CC0 which is still operating despite its old age. +90 212 261 8460 Ciragan Cad, Istanbul Miniaturk "Showcase of Turkey" Sheltered along the north-eastern shores of Golden Horn, this miniature park prides itself on being one of the world’s largest of its kind. A treasure trove of miniature renditions of Turkey’s best-known monuments, the park fuses architectural finesse with the history of the bygone Ottoman and Byzantine civilizations. This park holds models of over hundreds of by VikiPicture historic and architectural works including - but not limited to - the Library of Celsus at Ephesus, the Malabadi Bridge in Diyarbakir, Grand Mosque of Bursa, the Tomb of Mevlana in Konya, Dome of the Rock (Mescid-i Aksa), the Church of St.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage 42 COM WHC/18/42.COM/8A Paris, 14 May 2018 Original: English
    World Heritage 42 COM WHC/18/42.COM/8A Paris, 14 May 2018 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Forty-second session Manama, Bahrain 24 June - 4 July 2018 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2018, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2018. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2017. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 42 COM 8A, see Point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008 Annual Report 2008
    annual report 2008 Annual Report 2008 The business philosophy of Eurobank Tekfen observes sustainable growth and attaches equal importance to risk/return balance as it does to profitability and as such, enables the Bank to provide uninterrupted service to its customers under any market condition. Table of Contents • Eurobank Tekfen in Brief 3 • Financial Highlights 5 • Headlines from 2008 7 • Letter from the Chairman 10 • Letter from the CEO 15 • An Assessment of 2008 and Outlook for 2009 20 • EFG Leasing 27 • EFG İstanbul Securities 29 • Management and Corporate Governance 31 Board of Directors and Executive Management 33 Committees and Human Resources Practices 36 Board of Directors Report 46 The Bank’s Transactions with Its Risk Group 49 • Appendices 54 Appendix 1 Statutory Auditors’ Report 56 Appendix 2 Annual Report Statement of Compliance 58 Appendix 3 Financial Statements and Information on Financial Structure 60 • Independent Auditor’s Report 1 Eurobank Tekfen in Brief MERİÇ BRIDGE EDİRNE Meriç Bridge was built in 5 years and finished on 1847. It is 263 meters long, 7 meters wide, 13 feet from side to side on the 12 pointed arches and stone features are sloping. Corporate Profile Eurobank Tekfen in Brief Eurobank Tekfen offers high value-added products and services in corporate, commercial, small business and retail banking, as well as in leasing, factoring and investment banking through its 42 branches, internet branch applications and 661 employees. Having identified its corporate priorities as transformation, motivation and open communication, Eurobank Tekfen is focused on providing uninterrupted service to its customers under any market condition. Attaching great value to quality, productivity, efficiency and customer satisfaction, Eurobank Tekfen enjoys the pride of being a highly credible solution partner in international markets.
    [Show full text]
  • D.Bakir Calisma Eng
    Yedi Kardefl tower (1) 200 Another Look at East and Southeast of Turkey An old picture of Diyarbak›r nargile house/tea house (2) On the west bank of the Tigris, Diyarbak›r has been one of the main Provincial population settlements of the region At a 1,460,714 (2007) throughout history. Stone tools and glance Average altitude other artefacts unearthed in the 660m province reveal that the area has Area continuously been settled since 15,162 square kilometres Palaeolithic times. The Hurrians and Districts Mitannis were the first civilisations Diyarbak›r, Bismil, Çermik, Ç›nar, here, and they were followed by the Çüngüs, Dicle, E¤il, Ergani, Hani, Hittites, Assyrians, Medes, Hazro, Kocaköy, Kulp, Lice, Silvan Achaemenids, Parthians, Romans, Economy Byzantines and so forth. In the early Agriculture, Livestock farming, Light years of Christianity the city was an industry, Commerce, Tourism important religious centre called Amid Neighbouring provinces and produced many theologians, some Ad›yaman, Malatya and fianl›urfa (west), of whom are buried in the Virgin Mary Bingöl and Elaz›¤ (north), Mufl (north- Church. Muslim did conquest east), Batman (east), Mardin (south) Diyarbak›r in 639 by Halid bin Velid, one of the commanders of the army led by Îyâz bin Ganm who was given ern gates as “Tigris”, “Rum”, “Ermen” the mission of conquering el-Cezire. and “Tel”, respectively. He also men- Once Islam gained dominance in the tions the existence of a water right at region, Diyarbak›r was ruled in the the middle of the city whose source is 10th and 11th centuries by Mervanids, unknown and then describes the a Kurdish dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Works of Masonry Arch Bridges in Anatolia and Balkans
    Istanbul Bridge Conference August 11-13, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey RESTORATION WORKS OF MASONRY ARCH BRIDGES IN ANATOLIA AND BALKANS M. Elbir1, H. Sert2, S. Yılmaz3, E. M. Partal4, H. Demirci5, A. Avşin6, M.Nas7, G.S. Turan8 Translation by: H. İ. Korkmaz9 ABSTRACT It is one of the primary tasks of the General Directorate of Highways to repair and maintain the historic bridges which are of great importance in view of our cultural history in accordance with the projects to be developed or caused to be developed, apart from the recently constructed roads and bridges. Pursuant to the inventory records, it has been observed according to their period of construction (as of December 2013) that there exist a total of 1708 each bridges in our country dating back to Hittite Period (1), Urartian (1), Roman (129), East Roman (22), Seljuk (157), Ottoman (1328) and Early Republican (70) periods with 308 each bridges constructed during Ottoman era abroad. Out of 1708 bridges, such bridges are grouped according to their method of construction as follows: Stone (1625), Wooden (26), Iron (30), Reinforced Concrete (27). The historical bridges the majority of which is located on 1st degree seismic zone and which have proven to be durable for centuries, are considered to serve for a long time in case a relationship between the original construction techniques and soil-foundation- river is established. In this context, during execution of the restoration works which should be carried out in accordance with the least intervention principle, it is of great importance to define original construction systems of the bridges and their material wise characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tour of Turkish Mesopotamia
    A Tour of Turkish Mesopotamia David Pierce August , Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul http://mat.msgsu.edu.tr/~dpierce A Tour of Turkish Mesopotamia This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–Noncommercial–Share-Alike License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ CC BY: David Pierce $\ C Mathematics Department Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Istanbul, Turkey http://mat.msgsu.edu.tr/~dpierce/ [email protected] As explained in the text, this document concerns a trip made in the fall of , when I was living in Ankara and working at Middle East Technical University. I created this report later in . Now, almost five years later, I have made cosmetic changes, such as switching from A to A paper. I have found little reason to change much of the text itself. Contents Mathematics and history Holidays Departure Destination Harput Diyarbakır Malabadi Bridge Hasankeyf Yazidism Mor Gabriel Eating, drinking, and smoking Deyrulzafaran Mardin Harran Urfa Euphrates Mount Nemrut Septimius Severus Antep History and mathematics Mathematics and history Ayşe and I toured southeastern Turkey between Saturday, September , and Saturday, October , . Since then, from the books that we have at home, I have tried to learn more of the history of the places that we saw. This article is a result of my researches and thoughts. In school, I had an uneasy relationship with history. Many people have an uneasy relationship with mathematics, and one reason for this may be that there is no arguing with mathematics. If you’re wrong, you’re wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Anatolian Stone Arch Bridges and a Case Study for Malabadi Bridge
    Characteristics of Anatolian stone arch bridges and a case study for Malabadi Bridge A. Doğangün and A. Ural Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey ABSTRACT: Many civilizations settled in Anatolia which is one of the oldest settlements of the world due to the geographical conditions and they constructed some marvellous historical struc- tures. This study investigated the geometrical and structural characteristics of historical stone arch bridges in Anatolia. For this aim at first, constructed arch bridges are surveyed considering their lengths, heights, arch spans and number of arches etc. The Malabadi Bridge, one of the most famous historical heritage bridges, is selected as a case study. Finite Element Method is used for the modelling. Support settlements are considered in the analyses. The prototype mod- elled with continuum elements at macro-level and an analysis performed including nonlinear material behaviour is discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION A lot of construction materials were used for the historical structures like stone, brick, adobe or timber etc. Unfortunately many of the historical structures constructed with these materials ex- cept for the stone, have not lasted to the present time. Stone is one of the most durable materi- als. Therefore this material has been commonly used in historical structures. But it is not easy to construct every form using this material. Nevertheless stone was to play a part in the prestige of ancient nations, as in case of pyramids in Egypt. In later periods, large pre-hispanic monuments in Mexico, the great monumental walls of China, Roman, Byzantium walls, temples, and pal- aces, fortresses are among other examples.
    [Show full text]