DOCSLIB.ORG

Treasurer's Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treasurer's Manual Massachusetts Collectors and Treasurers Association TREASURER’S MANUAL Revised 2017 Chapter 1 Overview and Legal Basis of Municipal Finance in Massachusetts Legal Foundation of Municipal Finance The development of the powers and duties of Massachusetts cities and towns has evolved since colonial times. The Massachusetts General Laws set out the legal foundation of municipal finance, but new statutes, court decisions, agency regulations, and guidelines are constantly changing. Knowledge of where to find the statutes and regulations, and keeping up with changes is of great importance for all treasurers. More detail can be found on the Division of Local Services publication “A Guide to Financial Management for Town Officials” www.mass.gov/dor/docs/dls/publ/misc/town.pdf. Sources of Legal Information The Division of Local Services (DLS) of the State Department of Revenue (DOR) has statutory responsibilities regarding the assessment and collection of property and other local taxes, municipal budgets and debt, and municipal accounting and other financial practices. The Bureau of Municipal Finance Law serves as the legal bureau of the DLS and is available to municipal treasurers for legal advice and assistance. (See Bulletin 2006- 02B titled Bureau of Municipal Finance Law online at www.mass.gov/dls.) Treasurers can call to speak to one of the assigned “attorneys of the day” at 617-626-2400 or email a question to [email protected]. In an email request, a treasurer needs to include name, community, position, telephone number, and best time to reach you in case follow up is needed. The DLS has a website (www.mass.gov/dls) which is invaluable to municipal treasurers looking for legal information pertinent to their jobs. There are quick links from the DLS home page to a local officials directory, bulletins on new laws, regulations, procedures, and seminars and workshops being offered by the DLS, Informational Guideline Releases (IGR’s) which explain new laws and related regulations, copies of the newsletter, “City and Town”, copies of the Cherry Sheet which gives information regarding the state budget, state aid and assessments to individual municipalities, and other important information. Treasurers should subscribe to the online service for these important publications as they are no longer mailed to local officials. This can be done online or by contacting the DLS at 617-626-2353. There is no charge for this online service. (See DLS Bulletin 2003-09B titled Dissemination of DLS Information by Email online.) Each year, one of the DLS bulletins contains a summary of the prior year’s changes in municipal finance law. These bulletins are available at the DLS website quick links, cited above. Copies of the General Laws and Session Laws are available at the State House Bookstore, located in Room 116 of the State House, or at www.malegislature.gov. Page 1-1 The DLS has also published a volume entitled “Laws Relating to Municipal Finance and Taxation”, which provides municipal officials with most of the statutes relative to city and town government. Multiple copies are mailed to each municipality when the volume is updated –usually every three years. Contact the DLS legal department if there is not a volume in your office. The DOR website (www.mass.gov/DOR) has a number of publications which may be helpful to treasurers. They may be downloaded or saved to one’s computer. Among the titles are the following: Bureau of Accounts State House Note Program Forms; Cherry Sheet Manual; Developing a Capital Improvement Program: A manual for Massachusetts communities; Guide to Financial Management for Town Officials; Technical Assistance—A brochure detailing the DLS financial management assistance/consulting available to Massachusetts local governments. State law may also be researched by using the website, www.malegislature.gov. Current legislation and adopted statutes are available at this site. Massachusetts Collectors and Treasurers Association (MCTA) Website The website of the MCTA, www.masscta.com, has links to many other important websites including the following: • Department of Revenue • Division of Local Services • Ethics Commission • Legislation, including pending laws, hearings, description of gov’t • State and Local Employers • State Treasurer • Social Security • Mass Division of Employment and Training • Public Records Division • Registry of Deeds (Secretary of State) MCTA’s website also has the address, telephone number, and email address of the Association, which is available to all members for aid and assistance. In 2017, they were as follows: address: 510 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460; telephone: (978) 952-6644; fax: (978) 952-6655; email: [email protected] Proposition 2½ An example of a far reaching statute affecting the municipalities of the Commonwealth was an initiative petition resulting in a statewide referendum termed Proposition 2½ (Ch. 59 §21C) which was passed by the voters in 1980. It limits the amount of money a community can levy, i.e., raise through real and personal property taxes. At the DOR Pa ge 1-2 website (www.mass.gov/DOR), there is a list of publications, including two very helpful bulletins on Proposition 2 ½ , titled Levy Limits: A Primer on Proposition 2 ½ and Proposition 2 ½ Ballot Questions, Requirements, and Procedures. Proposition 2 ½ provided for two, distinct limitations. First, a community cannot levy more than 2.5 percent of the total full and fair cash value of all taxable real and personal property in the community. This constraint is generally called the community's "levy ceiling." Second, a community’s levy can only increase by a prescribed amount, discussed below, from year to year. This second constraint is generally called the community's "levy limit." Proposition 2½ directs the Department of Revenue to annually adjust each community’s levy limit by applying two statutory increases: (1) an automatic increase of 2.5 percent over the prior fiscal year's levy, and (2) a "new growth" increase, based on the value of new construction in the community, including additions to and alterations of real property, that did not result from property revaluation. Proposition 2½ also provides communities with local procedures whereby they can increase their tax levies above their levy limits. These procedures require voter approval at a referendum election. They include overrides, on the one hand, and debt exclusions and capital outlay exclusions, on the other. An override increases a community’s levy limit for the current fiscal year and becomes part of the base for calculating future years’ levy limits. Exclusions provide communities with a means to raise additional taxes to fund capital projects. Unlike overrides, though, exclusions do not become part of the tax base; therefore, they do not result in permanent increases in the tax levy. Furthermore, specific statutory provisions allow special exclusions, permitting communities, for certain limited capital purposes, to assess taxes above the levy limit or ceiling. The amount of a special exclusion is only added to the levy limit or ceiling for a temporary period of time, and does not become part of the base upon which the levy limit is calculated for future years. One such special debt exclusion permits a community to add water and sewer project debt service costs to its levy limit or levy ceiling for the life of the debt, as long as it reduces water and sewer rates by the same amount. Another special exclusion permits a community to assist homeowners to repair or replace faulty septic systems, remove underground fuel storage tanks or remove dangerous levels of lead paint in order to meet public health and safety code requirements. Proposition 2½ also permits communities, by referendum vote, to reduce their levy limits by passing an underride. An underride reduces the base upon which levy limits are calculated for future years, thereby resulting in a permanent decrease in the levy limit of a community. Municipal Powers and Duties With its enactment in 1966 of the Home Rule Amendment to the Massachusetts Constitution (Article 89 as reported in Article 2 of the Articles of Amendment), the Page 1-3 Legislature granted broad home rule powers to both cities and towns. Pursuant to the Home Rule Amendment, municipalities may now exercise any power or function that the Legislature has the power to confer, through the adoption, amendment, or repeal of local ordinances or bylaws. The Home Rule Amendment contains important exceptions and qualifiers, which limit the legislative power of cities and towns. These are set out in Article II §7, which states: Nothing in this article shall be deemed to grant to any city or town the power to (1) regulate elections other than those prescribed by sections three and four; (2) to levy, assess and collect taxes; (3) to borrow money or pledge the credit of the city or town; (4) to dispose of park land; (5) to enact private or civil law governing civil relationships except as an incident to an exercise of an independent municipal power; or (6) to define and provide for the punishment of a felony or to impose imprisonment as a punishment for any violation of law. Furthermore, the Home-Rule Amendment prohibits a municipality from exercising any power that is (a) denied to it by its own charter, or (b) reserved to the state under the Constitution. Also, the exercise of a municipality's powers must be consistent both with the Constitution and with all general and special laws enacted by the Legislature. The Legislature has conferred upon cities and towns the power or duty to: 1. Acquire any land, easement, or right on the territory within its boundaries for any public purpose. (40:14) The acquisition may be made by the means of an outright purchase, by an eminent domain taking, by gift, or by tax title. (60:64-69) 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidance Note
    Guidance note The Crown Estate – Escheat All general enquiries regarding escheat should be Burges Salmon LLP represents The Crown Estate in relation addressed in the first instance to property which may be subject to escheat to the Crown by email to escheat.queries@ under common law. This note is a brief explanation of this burges-salmon.com or by complex and arcane aspect of our legal system intended post to Escheats, Burges for the guidance of persons who may be affected by or Salmon LLP, One Glass Wharf, interested in such property. It is not a complete exposition Bristol BS2 0ZX. of the law nor a substitute for legal advice. Basic principles English land law has, since feudal times, vested in the joint tenants upon a trust determine the bankrupt’s interest and been based on a system of tenure. A of land. the trustee’s obligations and liabilities freeholder is not an absolute owner but • Freehold property held subject to a trust. with effect from the date of disclaimer. a“tenant in fee simple” holding, in most The property may then become subject Properties which may be subject to escheat cases, directly from the Sovereign, as lord to escheat. within England, Wales and Northern Ireland paramount of all the land in the realm. fall to be dealt with by Burges Salmon LLP • Disclaimer by liquidator Whenever a “tenancy in fee simple”comes on behalf of The Crown Estate, except for In the case of a company which is being to an end, for whatever reason, the land in properties within the County of Cornwall wound up in England and Wales, the liquidator may, by giving the prescribed question may become subject to escheat or the County Palatine of Lancaster.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GROUP TREASURER an ACT Guide to the First 100 Days in Hindsight, What Do You Wish You Had Known in Your First 100 Days As a Senior Treasury Leader?
    THE GROUP TREASURER An ACT guide to the first 100 days In hindsight, what do you wish you had known in your first 100 days as a senior treasury leader? Don’t be afraid to ask questions when you first join – asking obvious ones several months later will be embarrassing. It is also important to get to know your team as people and their capabilities asap (and if you are new to the organisation, your business) Jono Slade – AstraZeneca It is very important to learn about the business model of the company at first. Which values are created where, where the treasury department currently is involved and can support creating value. What are the biggest challenges and manual workload that is hindering project and development work. Thomas Woelk – CECONOMY Coming into a new multinational and rather decentralised mid-size company I wish I would have had a clear list/map of all the bank accounts and thereby banking partners from all subsidiaries and group companies. Christian Bartsch – Zentren für Neue Technologien A clear picture of who the stakeholders are: a comprehensive overview of the treasury network outside the team (controlling, tax, accounting, legal, audit AND management of the most important companies), as well as a comprehensive overview of contact persons with core banks Regina Deisemann – Verband Deutscher Treasurer 2 | An ACT guide to the first 100 days CONTENTS The Group Treasurer: an ACT Guide to the First 100 Days – introduction 4 What is the role of treasury in an organisation? 6 How is the treasurer role different from those in
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Property
    THE LAW OF PROPERTY SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS Class 14 Professor Robert T. Farley, JD/LLM PROPERTY KEYED TO DUKEMINIER/KRIER/ALEXANDER/SCHILL SIXTH EDITION Calvin Massey Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law The Emanuel Lo,w Outlines Series /\SPEN PUBLISHERS 76 Ninth Avenue, New York, NY 10011 http://lawschool.aspenpublishers.com 29 CHAPTER 2 FREEHOLD ESTATES ChapterScope -------------------­ This chapter examines the freehold estates - the various ways in which people can own land. Here are the most important points in this chapter. ■ The various freehold estates are contemporary adaptations of medieval ideas about land owner­ ship. Past notions, even when no longer relevant, persist but ought not do so. ■ Estates are rights to present possession of land. An estate in land is a legal construct, something apart fromthe land itself. Estates are abstract, figments of our legal imagination; land is real and tangible. An estate can, and does, travel from person to person, or change its nature or duration, while the landjust sits there, spinning calmly through space. ■ The fee simple absolute is the most important estate. The feesimple absolute is what we normally think of when we think of ownership. A fee simple absolute is capable of enduringforever though, obviously, no single owner of it will last so long. ■ Other estates endure for a lesser time than forever; they are either capable of expiring sooner or will definitely do so. ■ The life estate is a right to possession forthe life of some living person, usually (but not always) the owner of the life estate. It is sure to expire because none of us lives forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Usufruct Study Guide
    Article 562 ± 578 1. Define usufruct. Usufruct is a real right by virtue of which a person is given the right to enjoy the property of another with the obligation of preserving its form and substance, unless the title constituting it or the law provides otherwise. 2. What are the three fundamental Rights Appertaining to Ownership? Ownership consists of three fundamental rights, to wit: - jus disponende (right to dispose) - jus utendi (right to use) - jus fruendi (right to the fruits) 3. Of the above-mentioned fundamental rights, what consists usufruct and naked ownership? The combination of the jus utendi and jus fruendi is called usufruct. The remaining right jus disponendi is really the essence of what is termed ³naked ownership´. 4. What right is transferred to the usufructuary and what right is remained with the owner? In a usufruct, only the jus utendi and jus fruendi over the property is transferred to the usufructuary. The owner of the property maintains the jus disponendi or the power to alienate, encumber, transform, and even destroy the same. (Hemedes vs. CA, 316 SCRA 347 1999). 5. What are the formulae with respect to full ownership, usufruct, and naked ownership? The following are the formulae: - Full Ownership equals Naked Ownership plus Usufruct - Naked Ownership equals Full Ownership minus Usufruct - Usufruct equals Full Ownership minus Naked Ownership 6. What are the characteristics or elements of usufruct? The following are the characteristics or elements of usufruct: ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS: those without which it can not be termed usufruct: (a) It is REAL RIGHT (whether registered in the Registry of Property or not).
    [Show full text]
  • Inequitable Escheat: Reflecting on Unclaimed Property Law and the Supreme Court's Interstate Escheat Framework
    Inequitable Escheat?: Reflecting on Unclaimed Property Law and the Supreme Court's Interstate Escheat Framework T. CONRAD BOWER* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................... ...... 516 II. UNCLAIMED PROPERTY-ITS ORIGINS AND THE LAW GOVERNING ITS COLLECTION ......................... ..... 519 A. UnclaimedProperty's Origins in the English Doctrines of Escheat and Bona Vacantia ....................... 520 B. An Attempt at Uniformity: The Uniform Disposition of UnclaimedProperty Act ......................... 523 C. Recent Developments in State Enforcement of Unclaimed PropertyStatutes: A Vehicle for Aggressive Revenue Generation ............................ ....... 527 1. Reduced Statutory Dormancy Periods................... 528 2. Expanding the Definition of UnclaimedProperty ............ 530 3. Aggressive Multi-state Use of Contingent-Fee Auditors.................................. 533 a. The Duty to Report........................533 b. Multi-State Audits, Contingent-FeeAuditors, and the Relentless PursuitofRevenue ................ 534 D. Conclusion ........................................ 537 III. THE SUPREME COURT'S DUAL-PRIORITY FRAMEWORK AND THE CONTROVERSIAL EMERGENCE OF THE "THIRD-PRIORITY" RULE .................................................. 537 A. Texas v. New Jersey: The Birth of Interstate Escheat PriorityRules ...................................... 539 B. An Exception to the Dual-PriorityStructure? The Emergence of the Third-PriorityRule ................ 543 *J.D. Candidate, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, expected 2013; B.A., Government, Skidmore College, 2006. I am grateful to the members of the Ohio State Law Journal,most especially Kailee Goold, for their encouragement and advice throughout the note-writing process. I would also like to thank Jamie Ryan, member, Bailey Cavalieri LLC, Columbus, Ohio, for his thoughtful feedback on an earlier draft. I dedicate this Note to my wife and best friend, Megan, who has selflessly supported me in all of my pursuits. 516 OHIO STATE LA WJOURNAL [Vol. 74:3 C.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of the Fee Simple Katrina M
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 93 | Issue 1 Article 1 11-2017 In Defense of the Fee Simple Katrina M. Wyman New York University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1 (2017) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Law Review at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized editor of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\93-1\NDL101.txt unknown Seq: 1 15-NOV-17 13:44 ARTICLES IN DEFENSE OF THE FEE SIMPLE Katrina M. Wyman* Prominent economically oriented legal academics are currently arguing that the fee simple, the dominant form of private landownership in the United States, is an inefficient way for society to allocate land. They maintain that the fee simple blocks transfers of land to higher value uses because it provides property owners with a perpetual monopoly. The critics propose that landown- ership be reformulated to enable private actors to forcibly purchase land from other private own- ers, similar to the way that governments can expropriate land for public uses using eminent domain. While recognizing the significance of the critique, this Article takes issue with it and defends the fee simple. The Article makes two main points in defense of the fee simple. First, addressing the critique on its own economic terms, the Article argues that the critics have not established that there is a robust economic argument for dispensing with the fee simple.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Interests in Property in Minnesota Everett Rf Aser
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1919 Future Interests in Property in Minnesota Everett rF aser Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Fraser, Everett, "Future Interests in Property in Minnesota" (1919). Minnesota Law Review. 1283. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1283 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW FUTURE INTERESTS IN PROPERTY IN MINNESOTA "ORIGINALLY the creation of future interests at law was greatly restricted, but now, either by the Statutes of Uses and of Wills, or by modern legislation, or by the gradual action of the courts, all restraints on the creation of future interests, except those arising from remoteness, have been done away. This practically reduces the law restricting the creation of future interests to the Rule against Perpetuities,"' Generally in common law jurisdictions today there is but one rule restricting the crea- tion of future interests, and that rule is uniform in its application to real property and to personal property, to legal and equitable interests therein, to interests created by way of trust, and to powers. In 1830 the New York Revised Statutes went into effect in New York state. The revision had been prepared by a commis- sion appointed for the purpose five years before. It contained a code of property law in which "the revisers undertook to re- write the whole law of future estates in land, uses and trusts ..
    [Show full text]
  • Current Developments in Municipal Law
    ____________________________________________ Massachusetts Department of Revenue Division of Local Services Current Developments in Municipal Law 2010 Court Cases Book 2 Navjeet K. Bal, Commissioner Robert G. Nunes, Deputy Commissioner ____________________________________________ www.mass.gov/dls Court Decisions Table of Contents Book 2 Page Massachusetts Court & Arbitration Cases and Federal Court Cases Adams vs. Board of Assessors of Westport, 76 Mass. App. Ct. 180 (January 26, 2010) - Chapter 61A – Agricultural Land Tax Classification – Roll Back and Conveyance Taxes – Change in Use – Exemption for Construction of Residence for Family Member 1 Mark Andrews v. City of Springfield, 75 Mass. App. Ct. 678 (November 3, 2009) – Bidding – Building Contract – Lease with Option to Purchase – Construc- tion Contract Subject to Bidding Laws – Invalid Contract 4 Bererhout v. City of Malden, 431 B.R. 42 (June 22, 2010) – Bankruptcy – Automatic Stay of Collection Activities – Unpaid Parking Tickets – Administrative Hold on Renewal of Registration – Obligation to Discontinue Collection Efforts 8 Brasi Development Corp. v. Attorney General, 456 Mass. 684 (May 10, 2010) – Bidding – Building Contract – Long-term Lease 15 Calvao v. Town of Framingham, 599 F.3d 10, (First Cir. March 17, 2010) – Fair Labor Standards Act – Special Pay Period – No Duty to Give Notice to Employees 27 City of Lynn v. Lynn Police Association, 455 Mass. 590 (January 6, 2010) – Back Pay – Collective Bargaining – Bailout Act – Memorandum of Agreement to Repay Voluntary Concessions When City Received Additional Funds – Arbitration 33 City of Worcester v. AME Realty Corporation, 77 Mass. App. Ct. 64 (June 21, 2010) – Tax Foreclosure – Motion to Vacate Decree – Actual Notice – Rights of Redemption 38 District Attorney for the Northern District v.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Role of Treasury Report of Survey Results
    2014 AFP Strategic Role of Treasury Report of Survey Results Underwritten by 2014 AFP Strategic Role of Treasury Report of Survey Results June 2014 Underwritten by Association for Financial Professionals 4520 East-West Highway, Suite 750 Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone 301.907.2862 Fax 301.907.2864 www.AFPonline.org Redefining the Role of the Treasurer – The key to optimizing corporate performance in a more uncertain business environment The role of the corporate treasurer has been dramatically evolving since the financial crisis. There is renewed recognition of the importance of traditional treasury activities, while at the same time treasurers are being asked to play a more strategic role in corporate activities such as capital allocation. All this is in reaction to increased focus by corporate leaders and Boards of Directors on optimizing the use of cash on their companies’ balance sheets and on ensuring holistic risk management. We believe this shift is significantly altering how companies reach strategic decisions as they attempt to improve their performance in an increasingly uncertain business environment. With this in mind, Oliver Wyman is pleased to partner with the Association for Financial Professionals® (AFP) to produce the 2014 AFP Strategic Role of Treasury. The survey results indicate that the role of the treasurer is already undergoing a fundamental transformation. Most respondents currently devote less than a quarter of their time to managing their teams and day-to-day treasury undertakings in order to focus on a new and broader set of responsibilities which increasingly involves balance sheet management and risk-adjusted decision analysis. In fact, nearly half expect strategic decisions concerning capital allocations to be their primary focus in the next two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Preparing for the Hike Into the Financial
    VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1 SPRING/SUMMER 2010 a Strategic Treasurer newsletter Treasury Vision: Why preparing for the hike into the financial wilderness Of Roadmaps is no time to take risks! and Waypoints Credit Spreads in Valuation | 4 SWIFT & eBAM | 10 Developments in Treasury Technology | 13 Special Report: New Research Sheds Light on Money Fund Risk Factors Contents. Treasury 3 | Treasury Vision: Of Roadmaps and Waypoints Leadership Update A Strategic Treasurer 4 | An Introduction to the Use of Credit Spreads in Fair Valuation Newsletter Financial Risk Management 500 Westpark Drive, Suite 110 Peachtree City, GA 30269 5 | New Research Sheds Light on Money Fund Risk Factors +1 678.466-2220 Sponsored Content 7 | Achieving Visibility to Your Liquidity Subscriptions Relationships, Hedges, & Counterparties For a free subscription, visit www.StrategicTreasurer.com/ 9 | SWIFT Benefits: Options and Considerations for Corporations Newsletter Sponsored Content To unsubscribe, send your 10 | SWIFT and Electronic Bank Account Management name, organization, and Treasury Technology -- SWIFT mailing address to TreasuryUpdate@ 13 | Developments in Treasury Technology StrategicTreasurer.com Technology Column Advertising: For information and rates, Is it Time to Invest in Your Mind? contact: TUSales@ Read The Strategic Treasurer: A Partnership for Corporate Growth StrategicTreasurer.com Hear what leading Treasurers are saying: +1 678.466-2220 “…will become a tattered book on many treasurers’ bookshelves…” Mission Statement Tim Hart, treasurer Treasury Update, a resource First National Bank of Nebraska for Treasury professionals, is published bi-annually to raise “…I appreciate the void Craig is filling with awareness of key Treasury his book…He offers practical methods with items, issues, and events; assist immediate application.” with tactics and strategies; George Zinn, vice president and corporate and enable Treasurers and treasurer, their organizations to be more Microsoft Corporation resilient, effective, and efficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana and Texas Oil & Gas Law: an Overview of the Differences
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 52 | Number 4 March 1992 Louisiana and Texas Oil & Gas Law: An Overview of the Differences Patrick H. Martin Louisiana State University Law Center J. Lanier Yeates Repository Citation Patrick H. Martin and J. Lanier Yeates, Louisiana and Texas Oil & Gas Law: An Overview of the Differences, 52 La. L. Rev. (1992) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol52/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Louisiana and Texas Oil & Gas Law: An Overview of the Differences* Patrick H. Martin** and J. Lanier Yeates*** I. INTRODUCTION-SCOPE OF ARTICLE There is more that separates Louisiana and Texas than the Sabine River. Our two states have followed different paths to the law, as is soon discovered by any attorney who attempts to practice across state lines. Such attorneys find they must confront new terminology. Louisiana lawyers new to Texas may think a remainder is an after-Christmas sales item at Neiman-Marcus. A Texas lawyer, when faced with reference to a naked owner in Louisiana law, perhaps will conjure up the sort of legal practice that William Hurt had in drafting a will for Kathleen Turner in Body Heat. The terms apply to types of interest which are virtually the same. Our purpose in this presentation is to highlight certain features of the legal systems of the two states that make them distinct from one another, and also to go over certain areas in which they are not terribly different.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategic Corporate Treasurer Backbone of a Successful Organization
    The Strategic Corporate Treasurer Backbone of a successful organization November 2015 Foreword The success of any business strategy is anchored in its execution. In an increasingly uncertain, volatile and globalized external environment, execution risks often arise from factors external to an organization. While business strategy is typically focused on customers, market expansion, production and operations, a number of factors lying outside these focus areas can derail the strategy and even bring an organization to its knees. With the increasing inter- connectedness of markets, speed of information flow and stakeholder expectations that are measured from quarter to quarter, the margin of error in business strategy execution is ever diminishing. The corporate treasurer who was earlier tasked with managing market volatility and providing liquidity is now expected to monitor the margin of error in business strategy execution and take counter-measures to keep it in within acceptable limits. The success of the corporate treasurer of yester-year was defined by narrow metrics like hedging gain/ loss or cost of funding. However, the success of today’s corporate treasurer is defined by the ability to manage internal and external stakeholder expectations. Managing internal stakeholder expectations requires strategic partnership with various businesses to provide financial and risk management solutions. Managing external stakeholder expectations requires managing key financial metrics like return on equity, free cash flows and dividend distribution.
    [Show full text]