Louisiana Natural and Scenic Rivers' Descriptions
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Water Quality Modeling of Proposed River Reintroduction Into Maurepas Swamp (Po-0029)
WATER QUALITY MODELING OF PROPOSED RIVER REINTRODUCTION INTO MAUREPAS SWAMP (PO-0029) OCTOBER 3, 2019 WATER QUALITY MODELING OF PROPOSED RIVER REINTRODUCTION INTO MAUREPAS SWAMP (PO-0029) Prepared for Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority 150 Terrace Avenue Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Prepared by FTN Associates, Ltd. 7648 Picardy Avenue, Suite 100 Baton Rouge, LA 70808 FTN No. R05540-1567-001 October 3, 2019 October 3, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 APPROACH FOR SIMULATING NUTRIENTS .......................................................... 2-1 2.1 Overview of Approach ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Nutrient Loss Rates .............................................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Background Concentrations ................................................................................. 2-5 2.4 Boundary Concentrations and Flows ................................................................... 2-8 3.0 MODEL APPLICATION AND RESULTS .................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Model Scenarios................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Predicted Water Surface Elevation and Velocity ................................................. 3-1 3.3 Predicted Percent Mississippi River Water......................................................... -
Sinker Cypress: Treasures of a Lost Landscape Christopher Aubrey Hurst Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2005 Sinker cypress: treasures of a lost landscape Christopher Aubrey Hurst Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hurst, Christopher Aubrey, "Sinker cypress: treasures of a lost landscape" (2005). LSU Master's Theses. 561. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/561 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SINKER CYPRESS: TREASURES OF A LOST LANDSCAPE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Christopher Aubrey Hurst B.S., Louisiana State University, 2001 August 2005 Acknowledgements “Though my children shall roam through the forest, pursued by bruin, boar and serpent, I shall fear no evil, For God lives in the forest not the streets.” Latimer (Dad) I would thank my family, (Donna, Johny, Bill, Lisa, Willie, Karin, Arlene, Betty, Roy and Kristal) and my friends, (Cody, Chris, Samantha, Paul, Dave, Louis and Ted) for supporting me throughout the process of pursuing my master’s degree. A special thanks goes out to Marsha Hernandez who helped with to editing this thesis. -
Hurricane Isaac: Summary of Impacts on the Pontchartrain Basin Ezra
Hurricane Isaac: Summary of Impacts on the Pontchartrain Basin Ezra Boyd. PhD Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation Coastal Sustainability Program November 12, 2012 I) Introduction and Description of Storm Hurricane Isaac was a slow moving Category 1 that impacted the central Gulf Coast, including the Pontchartrain Basin, on August 2012. While tides slowly begun rising earlier that day, noticeable storm impacts first reached the region on the evening of Tuesday, August 28, with heavy rain and strong winds through that night and the entire next day. This storm followed what many experts considered the worst possible path for greater New Orleans (GNO), slowly skirting the southeast Louisiana coast in a westward direction. During the early hours of that Wednesday morning, the storm stalled for a few hours with the eye due south of New Orleans and just offshore of Grand Isle, La. This track meant that Southeast Louisiana endured 48+ hours of strong, easterly winds. The persistence of winds contributed to a stronger storm surge in tidal waterbodies, including Lake Pontchartrain. In fact, the storm driven high tide continued to impact the northshore of Lake Pontchartrain through Friday, August 31. Of note, this storm also produced uncharacteristically low central pressure given the storm strength, a characteristic that likely also contributed to the magnitude of the storm surge. On Saturday, September 1, the winds finally died down and the water slowly started to recede. The slow track that curved north after final landfall coupled with the intense moisture in the system also meant 48+ hours of intense rainfall throughout Southeast Louisiana. Storm impacts where widespread and diverse throughout southeast Louisiana. -
Recommendations for Freshwater Diversion to Louisiana Estuaries
0 0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 0 FRESHWATER DIVERSION TO LOUISIANA ESTUARIES EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER 0 0 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES COASTAL MANAGBIIBNT SECTION 0 0 Cover: a A plume of turbid water emanates from Bayou Lamoque as freshwater is diverted from the Mississippi River into the Breton �ound estuary to control salinity levels �nd enhance oyster production (p. 2). _ 0 0 . , 0 n 0 0 0 � 0 0 This document was published at a cost of $3.17 per copy by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 44396, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for the purpose of carrying out the requirements of the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management Program under the authority of Act 361 of 1979. This material was printed in accordance with 0 the standards for printing by state agencies established pursuant to R.S. 43:31 and was purchased in accordance with the provisions of Title 43 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. This project was financed through a grant provided under the Coastal Management Act of l9n, amendeci, which is administered by the U.S. Office of Coastal Zone Management, asNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 0 � 0 0 0 D RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FRESHWATER DIVERSION TO LOUISIANA EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER 0 ESTUARIES ( D by J. L. van Beek 0 D. Roberts D. Davis D. Sabins S. M. Gagliano 0 · Coastal Environments, Inc. 0 Baton Rouge, LA 0 This study was funded by: 0 Office of Coastal Zone Management National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 0 Department of Commerce · o prepared for: Coastal Management Section a Louisiana Department of Natural Resources G Baton Rouge, Louisiana 0 JUNE 1982 0 0 0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 CHAPTER IV: SUPPLEMENTAL FRESHWATER REQUIREMENTS List of Phot()S iii .. -
Attachment C3-26.1: Monitoring Station List
Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority 150 Terrace Avenue, Baton Rouge, LA 70802 | [email protected] | www.coastal.la.gov 2017 Coastal Master Plan Attachment C3-26.1: Monitoring Station List Report: Final Date: April 2017 Prepared by: Stokka Brown (Moffat and Nichol) 2017 Coastal Master Plan: Monitoring Station List Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority This document was prepared in support of the 2017 Coastal Master Plan being prepared by the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA). CPRA was established by the Louisiana Legislature in response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita through Act 8 of the First Extraordinary Session of 2005. Act 8 of the First Extraordinary Session of 2005 expanded the membership, duties and responsibilities of CPRA and charged the new authority to develop and implement a comprehensive coastal protection plan, consisting of a master plan (revised every five years) and annual plans. CPRA’s mandate is to develop, implement and enforce a comprehensive coastal protection and restoration master plan. Suggested Citation: Brown, S. (2017). 2017 Coastal Master Plan: Attachment C3-26.1: Monitoring Station List. Version Final. (pp. 1-4). Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority. Page | ii Agency Station_ID Station_Name Latitude Longitude Precip ET Wind STG Q TRG SAL TMP ATMP TUR TSS NO3 TPH DOP NH4 TON TN DON TKN TOC ALG Comments LDEQ 0001 Vermilion River at Perry, LA 29.951311 ‐92.156239 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LDEQ 0003 Mermentau River at Mermentau, LA 30.189923 ‐92.590420 111111 -
Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 114/Thursday, June 13, 2002/Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2002 / Notices 40735 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Dated: June 7, 2002. pages of comments from numerous Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: Art Payne, commenters, including the parties 202–564–3261; facsimile: 202–565– Acting Director, National Center for requesting more time. EPA believes that 0050; e-mail: [email protected]. Environmental Assessment. it has appropriately responded to the [FR Doc. 02–14993 Filed 6–12–02; 8:45 am] comments received. Furthermore, EPA SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BILLING CODE 6560–50–P is establishing these TMDLs pursuant to Foundation for Global Action on deadlines established in a consent Persistent Organic Pollutants: A United decree in the case styled Sierra Club, et States Perspective, developed by ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION al. v. Clifford et al., No. 96–0527, (E.D. scientists from EPA, other federal and AGENCY La.) which does not at this late date state agencies, and the academic permit EPA to grant additional time for [FRL–7227–3] community, is a technical support public comment, absent relief from the document aimed at informing decision Clean Water Act Section 303(d): Final court, which the Agency does not makers, general academia, and the Agency Action on 98 Total Maximum believe is necessary to seek here. public on the scientific foundation and Daily Loads (TMDLs) and Final Agency However, EPA will continue to accept relevance to the United States of the Action on 20 Determinations That information submitted regarding Stockholm Convention on Persistent TMDLs Are Not Needed potential errors in the TMDL, and/or to Organic Pollutants (POPs). -
City of Covington Flood Response Newsletter Fall 2018
CITY OF COVINGTON FLOOD RESPONSE NEWSLETTER FALL 2018 FLOODING IS A KNOWN RANKING HISTORIC CRESTS RECENT CRESTS HAZARD IN COVINGTON 1 19.20 ft on 03/12/2016 9.31 ft on 08/13/2016 Flash flooding, riverine flooding, and rainfall-induced 2 17.10 ft on 01/21/1993 19.20 ft on 03/12/2016 flooding are the most common flood types affecting the City of Covington. Recorded incidents include flash 3 16.63 ft on 07/01/2003 13.20 ft on 02/24/2016 floods and urban small-stream floods. Floods tend to be concentrated in low-lying areas near rivers and 4 16.50 ft on 02/22/1961 6.52 ft on 5/22/2015 streams with damage ranging from negligible cost to millions of dollars. Significant flooding due to high 5 16.50 ft on 06/11/2001 10.16 ft on 06/01/2014 intensity precipitation occurred in November 1979, May and June 1983, May 1995, during Hurricane Katrina in 6 15.39 ft on 08/30/2012 11.55 ft on 01/12/2013 August 2005, and most recently in March 2016. 7 14.20 ft on 01/07/1998 15.39 ft on 08/30/2012 Nested at the confluence of the Tchefuncte River and the Bogue Falaya (which captures the Abita River), the City of Covington is prone to riverine flooding, meaning 8 14.00 ft on 10/04/2002 9.8 ft on 03/27/2009 your house is in a flood-prone area. If you think you may be susceptible to flooding, call (985) 898-4725 to 9 13.80 ft on 09/27/2002 13.26 ft on 09/02/2008 learn more about the flood hazard for your property! 10 13.26 ft on 09/02/2008 9.10 ft on 12/31/2006 11 13.20 ft on 02/24/2016 5.55 ft on 04/30/2006 12 12.40 ft on 04/03/1998 16.63 ft on 07/01/2003 13 11.70 ft on 05/10/1995 3.65 ft on 01/01/2003 14 11.55 ft on 01/12/2013 9.09 ft on 12/25/2002 15 10.34 ft on 08/07/2002 14.00 ft on 10/04/2002 ENSURE YOU ARE NOT A VICTIM Because you are located within a floodplain, ask your insurance agent whether you are covered for flood damage. -
Decline of the Maurepas Swamp, Pontchartrain Basin, Louisiana, and Approaches to Restoration
water Article Decline of the Maurepas Swamp, Pontchartrain Basin, Louisiana, and Approaches to Restoration Gary P. Shaffer 1,2,3,*, John W. Day 2,4, Demetra Kandalepas 1,3, William B. Wood 1, Rachael G. Hunter 2, Robert R. Lane 2,4 and Eva R. Hillmann 1 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402, USA; [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (W.B.W.); [email protected] (E.R.H.) 2 Comite Resources, Inc. 11643 Port Hudson Pride Rd., Zachary, LA 70791, USA; [email protected] (J.W.D.); [email protected] (R.G.H.); [email protected] (R.R.L.) 3 Wetland Resources, LLC, 17459 Riverside Lane, Tickfaw, LA 70466, USA 4 Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA * Corresponding: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-985-549-2865; Fax: +1-985-549-3851 Academic Editor: Luc Lambs Received: 14 November 2015; Accepted: 24 February 2016; Published: 15 March 2016 Abstract: The Maurepas swamp is the second largest contiguous coastal forest in Louisiana but it is highly degraded due to subsidence, near permanent flooding, nutrient starvation, nutria herbivory, and saltwater intrusion. Observed tree mortality rates at study sites in the Maurepas swamp are very high (up to 100% tree mortality in 11 years) and basal area decreased with average salinities of <1 ppt. Habitat classification, vegetation productivity and mortality, and surface elevation changes show a clear trajectory from stagnant, nearly permanently flooded forests with broken canopy to degraded forests with sparse baldcypress and dominated by herbaceous species and open water to open water habitat for most of the Maurepas swamp without introduction of fresh water to combat saltwater intrusion and stimulate productivity and accretion. -
Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas
Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas By R. C. GILSTRAP FLOODS OF 1968 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission u. s. s. s. WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ROLL A, MO. RECEIVED APR 101972 AM PM 7|8|9|10|ll|12[li2i3i4i5|6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 76-185107 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1214 CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................................... Al Introduction.................................................................. ....................................................... 1 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions of terms and abbreviations...... .......... ........................................................... 3 Precipitation.................. .................................................................................................... 4 Floods.............................................................. -
Tangipahoa River, La, Entrance Channel
TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA. ENTRANCE CHANNEL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 1. Project description. The Tangipahoa River, La., Detailed Project Report provides for the excavation of an 8- by 100-foot navigation channel between the mouth of the Tangipahoa River and the 8-foot contour in Lake Pontchartrain. The lake bottom has a very gradual slope in the vicinity of the Tangipahoa River and about 1 mile of channel excavation is necessary to provide an 8-foot channel. An increase in length to approximately 13,000 feet would be required for a 10-foot channel and maintenance costs would be increased substantially by the larger channel. Frequently, boats on Lake Pontchartrain must leave the lake to avoid sudden squalls and high winds and seek a secure inland location, preferably the point from which the boat was launched. A larger channel is necessary across the lake bar than would be required inland as a result of wind action which sometimes depresses the water level as much as 2 to 3 feet. A depth of 8 feet is adequate for the anticipated traffic and is about the shallowest depth practicable to maintain with the hydraulic dredging equipment that is normally used to maintain nearby Federal project channels on other tributaries to the lake, such as the Chefuncte River, Bayou Lacombe, and Bayou Bonfouca. These dredges have 18- to 20-inch diameter discharge pipes and draw from 7 to 8 feet. After consideration of channels up to 10 feet deep and up to 125 feet wide, an 8- by 100-foot entrance channel was selected on the basis of the boats to be served and the costs for construction and maintenance of the channel. -
Water Resources of the Little River Basin, Louisiana
Water Resources of the Little River Basin, Louisiana By M. W. GAYDOS, J. E. ROGERS, and R. P. SMITH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1989 Prepared in cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Public Works and the Louisiana Geological Survey Department of Conservation, Baton Rouge, Louisiana UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600030 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price J3.15 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02416 CONTENTS Page Abstract ______________ _ ____________ 1 Acknowledgments _ - - ______-_-- - 2 Introduction __ 2 The hydrologic setting __ _____ ______ 4 Summary of geology _ .. 4 Topography and drainage _ ________________ 6 Water use _______ _ ___________ 7 Hydrologic zones _________ ________ 8 Zone A ______ _ 9 Streams 9 Aquifers 11 Suitability of water _ _ _ 16 Zone B _____________________________ _ ____ 19 Streams _-_-_ _ _____________ _ _ 19 Aquifers __________ ___________ _ _ 20 Suitability of water ________________________ 22 Zone C ____________________________________ 23 Streams 23 Aquifers ______________________________- 24 Suitability of water ________________________ 29 Water conditions at population centers __ _ 30 Ruston _______ ____________ 31 Jonesboro-Hodge _ _ _ _ _____________ 34 Winnfield __________________________________ 35 Tullos-Urania-Olla _____________________________ -
Bogue Falaya River and Abita Watersheds
Water Quality Monitoring for Watershed Protection Plan, Bogue Falaya and Abita Watersheds CFMS Contract No.: 691076 FINAL REPORT Andrea Bourgeois-Calvin, Chelsea Core, William Pestoff, Mary Davis 1 CFMS Contract No.: 691076 Cooperator: Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation Project Title: “Water Quality Monitoring for Watershed Protection Plan, Bogue Falaya and Abita Watersheds” FINAL REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION Program Background: The Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation (LPBF), in association with the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH), began performing intensive water quality monitoring around the Basin in 2001. Data analysis revealed sites north of the Lake to have significantly higher fecal coliform counts than sites south of the Lake. In 2002, LPBF began to investigate the sources of fecal pollution contributing to the high counts observed on north shore waterways, breaking down the task by sub-watershed. The LPBF’s “Sub-Basin Pollution Source Tracking Program” utilizes water quality analysis and geographic information systems (GIS) mapping to locate potential sources of pollution then provides on-the-ground assistance to correct the sources. To date, the Bogue Falaya, Tchefuncte, Tangipahoa, Natalbany, and Tickfaw watersheds have undergone this program. In the Bogue Falaya, the program resulted in dramatic decreases in fecal coliform levels (Figure 1) and the Bogue Falaya, Tchefuncte and Tangipahoa Rivers were removed from Impaired Water bodies List for fecal coliform bacteria in 2008. Figure 1. Fecal Coliform Geometric