DOCSLIB.ORG

Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas By R. C. GILSTRAP FLOODS OF 1968 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission u. s. s. s. WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ROLL A, MO. RECEIVED APR 101972 AM PM 7|8|9|10|ll|12[li2i3i4i5|6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 76-185107 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1214 CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................................... Al Introduction.................................................................. ....................................................... 1 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions of terms and abbreviations...... .......... ........................................................... 3 Precipitation.................. .................................................................................................... 4 Floods............................................................... ................................................................... 4 Arkansas River basin........ .................... ..................................................................... 4 Poteau River..................................................................................................... 4 Petit Jean River............................... ................................................................... 5 Fourche LaFave River........................................................................................ 5 Bayou Meto............................................................................................................. 6 FourcheCreek......................................................................................................... 6 Red River basin.......................................................................................................... 6 Red River............................................................................................................ 6 Little River...... ... .................................................................................................. 7 Ouachita River............... .................................................................................... 7 Caddo River............................................................................................................ 9 Little Missouri River............................................................................................. 10 Saline River...................................................................................................... 11 Bayou Bartholomew... ....................................................................................... 12 Flood damage..................................................................................................................... 12 Magnitude and frequency of floods..... ............................................................................. 18 Rainfall and runoff.............................................................................................................. 20 Flood-crest stages.................................................................................................................... 28 Measurement of flood discharge.......................................................................................... 29 Summary of peak stages and discharges.............................................................................. 33 Station description and discharge tables.......................................................................... 33 Arkansas River basin..................................................................................................... 38 Poteau River at Cauthron.......... ........................ ................................................ 38 James Fork near Midland..................................................................................... 39 James Fork near Hackett....................................................................................... 39 Pack Saddle Creek tributary near Waldron....................................................... 40 Petit Jean River near Booneville......................................................................... 40 Blue Mountain Reservoir near Waveland......................................................... 41 Petit Jean River near Waveland....................................................................... 42 Dutch Creek at Waltreak...................................................................................... 43 Petit Jean River at Danville................................................................................. 44 Jake Creek near Chickalah.................................................................................... 45 Tan-a-hill Creek near Boles.................................................................................. 45 Fourche La Fave River near Gravelly................................................................. 45 Brogan Creek near Rover................ ................................................................... 46 Nimrod Lake near Nimrod................................................................................... 47 Fourche La Fave River near Nimrod.................................................................. 47 South Fourche La Fave River near Hollis.......................................................... 48 Fourche La Fave River tributary near Perryville............................................. 49 III IV CONTENTS Page Station descriptions and discharge table Continued Arkansas River basin. Continued Little Maumelle River at Ferndale..................................................................... A49 Rock Creek at Shackleford Road in Little Rock................................................ 49 Grassy Flat Creek at Rodney Parham Road in Little Rock............................. 50 Coleman Creek at 28th Street in Little Rock..................................................... 50 Mile Branch near Tomberlin............................................................................... 50 Cypress Branch near Jacksonville...................................................................... 50 Bayou Meto near Jacksonville..................................................................................... 50 White Oak Branch near Lonoke.......................... .................................. ......... 51 Red River basin.............................................................................................................. 52 Red River at Index................................................................................................. 52 Twomile Creek near Hatneld. ........... .... ......................... 53 Rolling Fork near DeQueen....................................................................... .......... 53 Pepper Creek near DeQueen................................................................................. 54 Little River near Horatio.-...--....-.....................-...-..--.---..-.....-.--...-.................... 55 West Flat Creek near Foreman............................................................................. 56 Cossatot River near Vandervoort............. ..... ............. ........ .......... 56 Cossatot River near DeQueen.-..............-. ..........-. ........-.-................-.............. 57 Mill Slough tributary near Lockesburg..................................................................... 58 Saline River near Dierks........................................................................................ 58 Rock Creek near Dierks.......................................................................................... 59 Saline River near Lockesburg.............................................................................. 60 Millwood Reservoir near Ashdowii......................... ..... ....~................. 61 Red River at Fulton............................................... ............................................. 61 Caney Creek near Hope.......................................................................................... 62 Lewis Creek tributary near Mena.......... ............................................... .......... 62 Big Fork tributary at Big Fork............................................................................. 62 Ouachita River near Mount Ida............................................................... .......... 63 South Fork Ouachita River at Mount Ida.......................................................... 63 Barnes Branch near Mount Ida............................................................................ 64 Lake Ouachita near Hot Springs......................................................................... 64 Ouachita River at Blakely Mountain Dam near Hot Springs......................... 65 Glazypeau Creek at Mountain Valley................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas M

    Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas M

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 67 Article 30 2013 Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas M. B. Connior South Arkansas Community College, [email protected] C. Renn Tumlison Henderson State University H. W. Robison J. S. Placyk Jr. University of Texas at Tyler C. T. McAllister Eastern Oklahoma State College Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Connior, M. B.; Tumlison, C. Renn; Robison, H. W.; Placyk, J. S. Jr.; and McAllister, C. T. (2013) "Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 67 , Article 30. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol67/iss1/30 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 67 [2013], Art. 30 Additional Vertebrate Records and Natural History Notes from Arkansas M.B. Connior1*, R. Tumlison2, H.W. Robison3, J.S. Placyk, Jr.4 and C.T.

  • Basecamp for Mountain Adventures

    SPRING SUMMER BASECAMP FOR MOUNTAIN ADVENTURES FALL WINTER MENA ADVERTISING & PROMOTION COMMISSION WWW.VISITMENA.COM 479 ∙ 394 ∙ 8355 IN ANY SEASON WWW.VISITMENA.COM Great outdoors will take on a whole new meaning when you step into our back yard! Hello... this is Lum & Abner. We want you to know that the Lum & Abner Festival is the first weekend in June in Mena at Janssen Park! The event is free and folks get to enjoy live music both nights. There are always all kinds of arts & handcrafted items provided by locals and folks from all around. it always smells good at the lum & abner festival cause of all the tasty food being cooked up by vendors. Lots of other entertainment is happening too. Baby crawling contests, eating contests, fun things for the kiddies, a car show, basketball tournament, and even a 5K run. bring some friends & neighbors. Bring Grandpa, Grandma, cousins, aunts, and uncles. Why... you might even want to bring your mother-in-law. For more information Talimena National Scenic Byway go to www.visitmena.com or call 479-394-8355 Aubrey D. Tapley Park Table of Contents This sports complex is a 74 acre park which was started by Welcome to the Mena Advertising and Promotion Commission in 2003. It was named Aubrey D. Tapley Park in 2009. It currently houses 5 baseball/softball fields, soccer fields, concession The Ouachita Mountains! facilities including a pavilion, and two playgrounds. The complex is the venue for community events such as the Attractions.............................3-8 Annual 4th of July Celebration and multiple baseball/ softball and soccer tournaments each year.
  • Aquatic Fish Report

    Aquatic Fish Report

    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
  • Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain

    Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain

    92° 91° 90° 89° 88° Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Cape Girardeau 73cc 72 io Ri Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of This level III and IV ecoregion map was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 and depicts revisions and Literature Cited: PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Shannen S. Chapman (Dynamac Corporation), Oh ver environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were originally compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Omernik, J.M., 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map Barbara A. Kleiss (USACE, ERDC -Waterways Experiment Station), James M. ILLINOIS assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing 2003, Omernik, 1987). This poster is part of a collaborative effort primarily between USEPA Region Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map) (supplementary supplement): Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 77, no. 1, Omernik, (USEPA, retired), Thomas L. Foti (Arkansas Natural Heritage p. 118-125, scale 1:7,500,000. 71 the spatial differences in the capacities and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the VII, USEPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H., and Commission), and Elizabeth O. Murray (Arkansas Multi-Agency Wetland Bailey, R.G.): Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Planning Team). 37° environment by its probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999).
  • Flood-Frequency Comparison from 1995 to 2016 and Trends in Peak Streamflow in Arkansas, Water Years 1930–2016

    Flood-Frequency Comparison from 1995 to 2016 and Trends in Peak Streamflow in Arkansas, Water Years 1930–2016

    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood-Frequency Comparison from 1995 to 2016 and Trends in Peak Streamflow in Arkansas, Water Years 1930–2016 MISSOURI Eleven Point River S p r i n White River g Strawberry River R iv Black River Illinois River er North Sylamore Creek White River Black River Little Red River TENNESSEE OKLAHOMA Arkansas River ARKANSAS James Fork River Poteau White River Dutch Creek Bayou Meto South Fourche LaFave River Fourche LaFave River Arkansas River A Cossatot River nto in e R Saline River i v e Saline River r Little Missouri River B a MISSISSIPPI y o Mississippi River u Little River B a r t Ouachita River h o l o m e Red River S w m a c Bayou Macon kover Creek TEXAS Ouachita River LOUISIANA Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5131 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Physiographic sections in Arkansas and surrounding States (modified from figure 1). Flood-Frequency Comparison from 1995 to 2016 and Trends in Peak Streamflow in Arkansas, Water Years 1930–2016 By Paul A. Ensminger and Brian K. Breaker Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Emergency Management Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5131 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS.
  • Property Overview Colleen Morphew, Principal Broker 870-234-0978 Reynolds Forestry Consulting & Real Estate, PLLC

    Property Overview Colleen Morphew, Principal Broker 870-234-0978 Reynolds Forestry Consulting & Real Estate, PLLC

    Property Overview Colleen Morphew, Principal Broker 870-234-0978 Reynolds Forestry Consulting & Real Estate, PLLC www.reynoldsforestry.com Sale Price: Acres Age (years) Price Tract Pine Total Plantation Hardwood Hardwood Total Per acre Plantation Cossatot 641 641 48 593 5 >50 $ 693,142 $ 1,081 Tract Acres: 641 acres with 3.25 miles of Baker Creek frontage. Property Overview: Scenic timberland property in the Ouachita Mountain Range with water frontage displaying panoramic mountain views of natural and planted pine and hardwood forests networked with a good road system. The property fronts Baker Creek for 3.25 miles which feeds Harris Creek and the Cossatot River; all renowned for their canoeing and recreation. The Cossatot River State Park-Natural Area is south of the property and is also nearby the Howard County State Wildlife Management Area. State Park Natural Area: The Cossatot River State Park-Natural Area; its 5,484 acres emphasize outdoor recreation, river preservation and environmental education. Interpretive programs are available by request. The park is managed by Arkansas State Parks and the Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission. The below excerpt is from the Arkansas State Park’s web site: • The park-natural area stretches for 12 miles along the wild and scenic Cossatot River, Arkansas's premier whitewater experience renowned as the best whitewater float stream in mid-America. Located in southwest Arkansas south of Mena, the Cossatot forms Cossatot Falls, a rugged and rocky canyon that challenges the most experienced canoeists and kayakers with its Class IV and V rapids. When the water is high, the paddlers are here.
  • Fishes Collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927'

    Fishes Collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927'

    PUB. UNIV. OKLA: BIOL. SURV. VOV. I. NO. 3: APRIL, 1929. Fishes Collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927' Carl L. Hubbs, University of Mkkigan A. I. Ortenburger, University of Oklaltomu I. INTRODUCTION This is the third report of the current fish survey of Okla- homa. It treats the collections obtained during the summer of 1927, when the field party from the Museum of Zoology of the Uni- versity of Oklahoma, again led by A. I. Ortenburger, visited southeastern Oklahoma, western Arkansas, and northeastern Okla- homa. The streams which were seined lie in the Red River, Ouachita and Arkansas drainage systems. One new species, Notropis greenei, was obtained in both Okla- homa and Arkansas; we have it also from Missouri. This species was listed several times from Missouri and Arkansas by Meek, who first confused it with N. boops and later referred it to N. xmnocc- phazus. Although only this one undescribed species was obtained in the 1927 survey, a number of other discoveries, of interest from zoo- geographical and systematic standpoints, were made. Twenty-one of the species obtained in Oklahoma have not previously been at- tributed to that state: a considerable addition to the list of slightly more than one hundred already recorded. These new records tes- tify to the extreme richness of the fish fauna of eastern Oklahoma. The abundance of species there is further indicated by the fact that most of the species, ahout twenty-five in number, reported from Oklahoma by earlier collectors but not yet obtained during the course of the present survey, were also obtained in that part of the State.
  • Reproductive Ecology and Habitat Preference of the Leopard Darter, Percina Pantherina

    Reproductive Ecology and Habitat Preference of the Leopard Darter, Percina Pantherina

    REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA By PAUL WILLIAM /~AMES Bachelor of Science University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 1981 ·4::er of Science ...1.issouri State University 3pringfield, Missouri 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the·Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1989 . - ~· ,• ) "' Oklahoma State Univ. Lihra1 REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA Thesis Approved: ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Dr. o. Eugene Maughan, for giving me the opportunity to work on this project and for his encouragement throughout my graduate program. I would also like to thank the members of my graduate committee, Dr. William A. Drew, Dr. Anthony A. Echelle, Dr. Rudolph J. Miller, and Dr. Alexander v. Zale, for their professional and personal advice throughout the course of the study. I wish to extend my sincere gratitude to the u. s. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for providing financial and technical support for the study. I am especially grateful to Mr. Frank James of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation's McCurtain County Wilderness Area for his friendship and hospitality during extended field trips. A sincere thanks goes to Rick Horton, Steve O'Donnell, and Todd Phillips for their help in the field and laboratory. A special thanks goes to Stuart Leon for helping with the development of many of the field and data analysis techniques used in this study.
  • Population and Conservation Biology of The

    Population and Conservation Biology of The

    POPULATION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF THE THREATENED LEOPARD DARTER By CONRAD STEFAN TOEPFER Bachelor of Science Centre College Danville, Kentucky 1990 Master of Science Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana 1992 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1997 p::t q '1 D 1 t,1,r >P POPULATION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF THE THREATENED LEOPARD DARTER Thesis Approved: dJ~?t~ Thesis Adviser ~· Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my adviser, Dr. William L. Fisher, for his encouragement and assistance on this project. He allowed me to flourish, and I will always value his contribution to my future. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Tony Echelle, Dr. Stan Fox, Dr. Don Turton, and Dr. Emily Stanley, for their advice during the course of my research. I would like to thank the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, U.S. Fish and Widlife Service, and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for their financial support of the study. I would like to extend special thanks to Ken Collins at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ecological Services Office for his assistance in obtaining additional funding and special permits and for his general advice and insights concerning leopard darters. I appreciate a number of students and family members that helped with field work. I extend my thanks to Rex iii Anderson, Mike Sams, Mike Miller, Jason Ballew, and Tracy Brotherton.
  • Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003

    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003

    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6
  • Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis Powellii I

    Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis Powellii I

    Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis powellii I. Lea, 1852) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office Conway, Arkansas 5-YEAR REVIEW Arkansas Fatmucket (Lampsilis powellii I. Lea, 1852) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete review Public notice of the initiation of this 5-year review was given in the Federal Register on September 8, 2006 (71 FR 53127-53129) and a 60 day comment period was opened. During the comment period, we did not receive any additional information about Arkansas fatmucket (Lampsilis powelllii) other than specific information from biologists familiar with the species. This review was completed by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Arkansas Field Office. Arkansas fatmucket only occurs in the state of Arkansas. Literature and documents on file at the Arkansas Field Office were used for this review. All recommendations resulting from this review are a result of thoroughly reviewing the best available information on the Arkansas fatmucket and the reviewer’s expertise as one of the leading authorities on this species. Comments and suggestions regarding the review were received from Arkansas Field Office supervisors and peer reviews from outside the Service (see Appendix A). No part of the review was contracted to an outside party. B. Reviewers Lead Region – Southeast Region: Nikki Lamp, (404) 679-7118 Lead Field Office – Conway, Arkansas: Chris Davidson, (501) 513-4481 C. Background 1. Federal Register Notice initiating this review: September 8, 2006. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Review of 14 Southeastern Species. (71 FR 53127) 2.
  • Coal Investigation in the Saline-Gallatin Field, Illinois, and the Adjoining Area.

    Coal Investigation in the Saline-Gallatin Field, Illinois, and the Adjoining Area.

    COAL INVESTIGATION IN THE SALINE-GALLATIN FIELD, ILLINOIS, AND THE ADJOINING AREA. By FRANK W. DEWOLF. INTRODUCTION. The area here described is near the southwest edge of the Eastern Interior coal field, lying mostly in Illinois, but extending also into Indiana and Kentucky. Its boundaries are slightly beyond those of the Eldorado and New Haven quadrangles, and it measures 30^ miles from east to west and 18^ miles from north to south, thus including approximately 550 square miles. Parts of four counties in Illinois Saline, Gallatin, White, and Hamilton are comprised within the area. Coal production in this region is increasing so rapidly that geologic work carried on here assumes an important economic aspect. The rapid development of this part of the coal basin is due to the excellent quality of the fuel, its extensive distribution, and favorable mining conditions. The production to date has been entirely in the Illinois portion of the area and until the last year only in Gallatin and Saline counties. White County also is now producing. In 1906 the area included in this report produced 314,927 tons, a gain of 115 per cent over 1905.a Coal mining in the Eldorado quadrangle is facilitated by the presence of several railroads; the New Haven quadrangle has none. The whole area, however, has so little relief that it can be easily reached by railroads where desired. This preliminary statement of geologic field work performed during three autumn months of 1906 is the first published report for this area since 1875,& though adjoining areas in Indiana 0 and Kentucky d have received later attention.