Masarykova Univerzita Přírodovědecká Fakulta Ústav Botaniky a Zoologie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Masarykova Univerzita Přírodovědecká Fakulta Ústav Botaniky a Zoologie Masarykova univerzita Přírodovědecká fakulta Ústav botaniky a zoologie Srovnání taxocenóz a vertikální stratifikace letové aktivity kůrovců (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) v tvrdém luhu a horských jedlobučinách Diplomová práce Brno 2011 Autor: Jiří Procházka Vedoucí DP: Dipl. Biol. Jiří Schlaghamerský, Ph.D. Prohlášení Souhlasím s uloţením této bakalářské práce v knihovně Ústavu botaniky a zoologie PřF MU v Brně, případně v jiné knihovně MU, s jejím veřejným půjčováním a vyuţitím pro vědecké, vzdělávací nebo jiné veřejně prospěšné účely, a to za předpokladu, ţe převzaté informace budou řádně citovány a nebudou vyuţívány komerčně. V Brně 10. 5. 2011 Poděkování Na tomto místě bych chtěl poděkovat dr. Jiřímu Schlaghamerskému za vedení mé práce, dr. M. Kníţkovi za pomoc s determinací materiálu, D. Hauckovi za pomoc při sběru dat, P. Průdkovi za pomoc s tříděním vzorků a P. Šebkovi za cenné rady, týkající se statistického hodnocení dat. Také bych rád poděkoval rodině, bez jejíţ podpory by tato práce nikdy nevznikla. Výzkum byl proveden v rámci projektu financovaného grantem GAAV KJB 600960705 a výzkumným záměrem MSM 0021622416. ABSTRAKT Společenstva kůrovců v oblasti soutoku Moravy a Dyje a v Beskydech byla studována prostřednictvím odchytu do nárazových pastí, uspořádaných do vertikálních transektů ( 0,5 aţ 21 m nad zemí). V oblasti Soutoku bylo uloveno 1428 jedinců, patřících 30 druhům, z nichţ čtyři byly v daném území nově zjištěné, šest druhů je zařazeno v červeném seznamu ohroţených druhů České republiky do kategorie zranitelný a tři druhy jsou v ČR nepůvodní. V Beskydech bylo zachyceno 6698 jedinců 27 druhů, z nichţ výskyt tří druhů byl v této oblasti dosud neznámý, jeden je klasifikován v červeném seznamu ohroţených druhů České republiky jako zranitelný a jeden je v ČR nepůvodní. Kůrovci tedy byli mnohem hojnější v Beskydech, avšak společenstvo Soutoku se vyznačovalo větší druhovou diverzitou. Byla vyhodnocena fenologie 16 nejhojnějších druhů. Pozorován byl monovoltinní i bivoltinní vývojový cyklus i sesterské generace. Nejvíce jedinců bylo zaznamenáno v 21 metrech, kdeţto druhově nejbohatší se ukázala výška 7 metrů nad zemí. Výšková preference jednotlivých druhů se však výrazně lišila, pravděpodobně kvůli různým potravním nárokům. Dále bylo potvrzeno, ţe většina kůrovců nepreferuje osvětlenější stanoviště. ABSTRACT Comparison of assemblages and vertical stratification of flight activity of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in hard-wood floodplain forests and montane fir-beech forests. Assemblages of bark and ambrosia beetles were assessed in the floodplain close to the confluence of the Morava and Dyje Rivers and in the Beskydy mountains (Czech Republic) by using flight interception traps arranged into vertical transects (0,5 to 21 metres above ground level). 1428 specimens belonging to 30 species were collected in the area of Confluence. Four of them are new for this area, six species are included in the Red list for Czech Republic as vulnerable and three species are considered as non-indigenous in the Czech Republic. 6698 specimens of 27 species were collected in the Beskydy mountains. Three of them are new for this area, one species is included in the Red list for Czech Republic as vulnerable and one species is considered as non-indigenous in the Czech republic. Scolytids were more abundant in the Beskydy mountains, while the assemblage was more diverse at the Confluence. Phenology was assessed for 16 of the most abundant species. Univoltine and bivoltine life cycles and sister generations were observed. Most of the specimens were recorded 21 m above ground, while most of the species were collected at 7 m. Flight activity of single species differed, probably due to food preferences. It was also confirmed that most of the bark and ambrosia beetles do not prefer insolated habitats. OBSAH 1. ÚVOD……………………………………………………………......…………….… 7 2. MATERIÁL A METODIKA…………………………………….…...….……….. 13 2.1. Charakteristika oblasti soutoku Moravy a Dyje………………………….… 13 2.2. Charakteristika lokalit v oblasti Soutoku………………....………..…...…... 15 2.3. Charakteristika Chráněné krajinné oblasti Beskydy……………..……...… 17 2.4. Charakteristika beskydských lokalit………………………………...…..….. 19 2.5. Metodika sběru dat……………………………………………………........… 22 2.6. Analýza dat…………………………………………………………..……...… 25 3. VÝSLEDKY…………………………………………………………………….…. 30 3.1. Zhodnocení účinnosti odchytu do nárazových pastí…………………...….... 30 3.2. Obecné charakteristiky společenstev kůrovců…...…………………..……... 32 3.3. Srovnání společenstev kůrovců na Soutoku a v Beskydech………..…....…. 33 3.4. Srovnání jednotlivých lokalit na Soutoku…………………...…………….... 40 3.5. Srovnání jednotlivých lokalit v Beskydech…………………………...…...… 42 3.6. Srovnání transektů na jednotlivých lokalitách na Soutoku a v Beskydech………………………………………………………….………..…. 44 3.7. Fenologie nejhojnějších druhů Soutoku…………………….…………..……45 3.8. Fenologie nejhojnějších druhů Beskyd………………………………...……. 50 3.9. Porovnání vertikálního rozmístění letové aktivity kůrovců na Soutoku a v Beskydech………………………………………………………………..... 56 3.10. Vertikální stratifikace letové aktivity nejhojnějších druhů Soutoku…….. 60 3.11. Vertikální stratifikace letové aktivity nejhojnějších druhů Beskyd…....... 66 3.12. Analýza hlavních komponent (PCA)…………………………………..…... 71 3.13. Testování vztahu kůrovců ke světelnosti……………………….……..….... 73 4. DISKUZE…………………………………………………………………...……... 74 4.1. Použití nárazových pastí………………………………………………..……. 74 4.2. Kůrovci v jihomoravských luzích…………………...………………...……... 74 4.3. Kůrovci v Beskydech…………………………………………….……..…….. 75 4.4. Srovnání taxocenóz kůrovců Soutoku a Beskyd……………………..……... 76 4.5. Srovnání výskytu kůrovců na jednotlivých lokalitách na Soutoku a v Beskydech……………………………….………………….…….…….... 78 4.6. Výskyt kůrovců v průběhu sezóny na Soutoku……………………...….…... 79 4.7. Výskyt kůrovců v průběhu sezóny v Beskydech…………………...…….…. 80 4.8. Vertikální distribuce kůrovců v porostu……………………………...…….. 80 4.9. Vztah kůrovců ke světelnosti……………………………….………..…......... 81 5. ZÁVĚR………………………………………………………………….…..……... 82 6. LITERATURA………………………………...……………………………..……. 83 7. PŘÍLOHY………………………………………………………………………….. 92 7 1. ÚVOD Rozrůznění nik je zajímavý způsob, jak se vyhnout kompetici. Jednou z moţností je časový posun, kdy si organismy nekonkurují kvůli asynchronnímu vývojovému cyklu. Např.kudlanka Tenodera sinensis se v oblasti společného výskytu s kudlankou náboţnou (Mantis religiosa) líhne o 2–3 týdny dříve, takţe její nymfy jsou vţdy větší, čímţ se úspěšně vyhýbají mezidruhové kompetici (Hurd & Eisenberg 1990). Další moţností, jak se vyhnout případnému konkurentovi je vertikální stratifikace, coţ znamená, ţe soutěţící druhy preferují různou výšku. Tento jev byl zaznamenán např. v tropickém deštném lese v Ekvádoru u sympatrického komplexu babočkovitých motýlů z podčeledi Ithomiinae. Výška, ve které motýli nejčastěji létali, se mezi druhy výrazně lišila a zároveň pozitivně korelovala s výškou, kde rostla hostitelská rostlina (Baccaloni 1997). Podobně dva druhy opylovačů v tropickém deštném lese obsadily dolní část koruny a jiné dva druhy opylovaly pouze květy v horní části (Perry 1984). Pokud ulovíme hmyz v určité výšce, nemusí to nutně znamenat, ţe se tam hledá potravu či se rozmnoţuje, ale můţeme takto zaznamenat i disperzi či migraci, ať uţ v preferované a nebo náhodné výšce nad zemí (Ulyshen & Hanula 2007). Typickým příkladem jsou švábi (Blattodea), u nichţ bylo zjištěno, ţe mobilnější druhy létají nejvýše, naopak špatní letci spíše při zemi. Zároveň ale samci vţdy létají výš neţ samice, aby tak lépe zachytili jejich feromony (Schal 1982). Aktivita ţivočichů v různých výškách porostu je do značné míry ovlivněna strukturou porostu. Podle Parkera (1995) se nejníţe nachází vrstva lesní hrabanky, nad níţ je bylinné patro, tvořené bylinnou vegetací a semenáčky dřevin. Následuje podrost, který je tvořen zejména křovinami a odrůstajícími stromy, na nějţ navazují niţší koruny stromů, které tvoří přechod mezi podrostem a plně či z větší části osluněnou hlavní úrovní korun. Horní část hlavní úrovně, plně exponovaná vnějším vlivům, se nazývá vnější koruna, nad níţ výjimečně vystupují pouze koruny nejvyšších stromů, neboli nadúroveň. Jennings et al. (1999) rozdělili koruny stromů podle osvětlení na dominantní patro, které vystupuje nad hlavní korunové patro a které je plně exponované slunečnímu záření shora i z boku, kodominantní patro, coţ je hlavní korunové patro, plně osvětlené shora, střední patro, které se nachází pod hlavním korunovým patrem, ale stále je alespoň částečně osvětleno, a spodní korunové patro, ke kterému se skrz předchozí patra dostává jen minimum světla. Pokud se zaměříme na hmyzí faunu v korunách stromů opadavého temperátního lesa, zjistíme, ţe převaţují síťokřídlí (Neuroptera) a ploštice (Heteroptera), významný podíl 8 mají i brouci (Coleoptera), přestoţe jde jen o několik málo druhů, např. kůrovců (Scolytinae) nebo drabčíků (Staphylinidae), jak zjistili např. Müller et al. (2007) a Gruppe et al. (2008). I kdyţ je mezi brouky spousta dobrých letců, zdá se, ţe většina druhů preferuje spíše podrost oproti koruně (Müller et al. 2007, Ulyshen & Hanula 2007 a Vodka et al. 2008). Je škoda, ţe tolik prací, zaměřených na prostorovou distribuci hmyzu, se omezuje pouze na vyšší taxonomické skupiny, jelikoţ aktivita konkrétních druhů v rámci skupiny se můţe velmi lišit (Ulyshen & Hanula 2007). I kdyţ se zdá, ţe většina druhů kůrovců je rovnoměrně distribuována napříč porostními patry s mírnou preferencí střední výšky (Wermelinger
Recommended publications
  • Interacting Effects of Forest Edge, Tree Diversity and Forest Stratum on the Diversity of Plants and Arthropods in Germany’S Largest Deciduous Forest
    GÖTTINGER ZENTRUM FÜR BIODIVERSITÄTSFORSCHUNG UND ÖKOLOGIE - GÖTTINGEN CENTRE FOR BIODIVERSITY AND ECOLOGY - Interacting effects of forest edge, tree diversity and forest stratum on the diversity of plants and arthropods in Germany’s largest deciduous forest Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen vorgelegt von M.Sc. Claudia Normann aus Düsseldorf Göttingen, März 2015 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Teja Tscharntke 2. Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Vidal Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 27.04.2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. - 7 - Introduction ....................................................................................................................... - 8 - Study region ..................................................................................................................... - 10 - Chapter outline ................................................................................................................ - 15 - References ....................................................................................................................... - 18 - CHAPTER 2 HOW FOREST EDGE–CENTER TRANSITIONS IN THE HERB LAYER INTERACT WITH BEECH DOMINANCE VERSUS TREE DIVERSITY ....................................................... - 23 - Abstract ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Platypodinae) Alien to Europe
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys Bark56: 227–251 beetles (2010) and pinhole borers (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Platypodinae) alien to Europe 227 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.56.529 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Bark beetles and pinhole borers (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Platypodinae) alien to Europe Lawrence R. Kirkendall1, Massimo Faccoli2 1 Department of Biology, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7803, N-5006 Bergen, Norway 2 Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop Productions – Entomology, Viale dell’Università, 16 - 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy Corresponding author: Lawrence R. Kirkendall ( [email protected] ) Academic editor: Miloš Knížek | Received 24 October 2009 | Accepted 31 March 2010 | Published 17 September 2010 Citation: Kirkendall LR, Faccoli M (2010) Bark beetles and pinhole borers (Curculionidae, Scolytinae, Platypodinae) alien to Europe. In: Cognato AI, Knížek M (Eds) Sixty years of discovering scolytine and platypodine diversity: A tribute to Stephen L. Wood. ZooKeys 56 : 227 – 251 . doi: 10.3897/zookeys.56.529 Abstract Invasive bark beetles are posing a major threat to forest resources around the world. DAISIE’s web-based and printed databases of invasive species in Europe provide an incomplete and misleading picture of the alien scolytines and platypodines. We present a review of the alien bark beetle fauna of Europe based on primary literature through 2009. We fi nd that there are 18 Scolytinae and one Platypodinae species ap- parently established in Europe, from 14 diff erent genera. Seventeen species are naturalized. We argue that Trypodendron laeve, commonly considered alien in Europe, is a native species; conversely, we hypothesize that Xyleborus pfeilii, which has always been treated as indigenous, is an alien species from Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae)
    © Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 8 December 2014 Corrections and comments to the Norwegian part of the Palaearctic list of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) TORSTEIN KVAMME & ÅKE LINDELÖW Kvamme, T. & Lindelöw, Å. 2014. Corrections and comments to the Norwegian part of the Palaearctic list of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Norwegian Journal of Entomology 61, 201–212. Pityogenes irkutensis irkutensis Eggers, 1910, Trypophloeus dejevi (Stark, 1936), Carphoborus cholodkovskyi Spessivtsev, 1916 and Cyclorhipidion bodoanus (Reitter, 1913) are added to the Norwegian part of the Palaearctic list. Ips amitinus (Eichhoff, 1872) should be listed as intercepted to Norway, since it is recorded in imported timber but not documented as established in Norway. Seven species are deleted from the Norwegian part of the Palaearctic list of bark beetles: Hylastes ater (Paykull, 1800), Hylurgus ligniperda (Fabricius, 1787), Phloeotribus rhododactylus (Marsham, 1802), Ernoporicus fagi (Fabricius, 1798), Pityogenes saalasi Eggers, 1914, Scolytus mali (Bechstein & Scharfenberg, 1805) and Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham, 1802). Their faunistic history in Norway is presented, which shows that they are listed as Norwegian due to historically inherited mistakes. Scolytus triarmatus (Eggers, 1912) and Orthotomicus longicollis (Gyllenhal, 1827) are known from one single specimen respectively. Their faunistic history in Norway is presented and discussed. It is an unanswered question if these species have populations in Norway. Scolytus scolytus (Fabricius, 1775) is not listed as Norwegian in the Palaearctic catalogue. However, it is a part of the historical confusion and was earlier mentioned as recorded in Norway. The faunistic history is presented and discussed together with S. triarmatus. Trypophloeus Fairmaire, 1864 is a taxonomic and nomenclatorial problematic genus, which is strongly in need of a modern revision.
    [Show full text]
  • And Type the TITLE of YOUR WORK in All Caps
    SUBCORTICAL BEETLE COMMUNITIES OF GEORGIA by KAYLA AMBER BROWNELL (Under the Direction of Kamal JK Gandhi) ABSTRACT I studied the population and community ecology of bark and woodboring beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, and Curculionidae) and their predators (Coleoptera: Cleridae and Trogossitidae) in the Piedmont region of Georgia. Specifically, I assessed the responses of these beetle taxa to prescribed burning, their seasonal phenology, responses to semiochemicals, and species composition in forested and urban areas. A total of 112,949 Ips spp. and 6,200 predatory beetles were trapped over a year. The effects of immediate or short-term prescribed burning on these beetle populations were negligible indicating resilience to low-intensity disturbances. Around nurseries and warehouses, 4,093 adults representing 103 species of bark and woodboring beetles were trapped. Exotic species dominated these sites (comprising 60% of catches and 13% of species richness). Greater numbers and species of bark beetles were trapped at nurseries than warehouses, and their communities were distinct. Responses of beetles to semiochemical lures and their phenology patterns were highly species-specific. INDEX WORDS: bark beetles, ecology, exotic, fire, Ips engraver, semiochemical, woodborer beetles SUBCORTICAL BEETLE COMMUNITIES OF GEORGIA by KAYLA AMBER BROWNELL BS, University of Florida, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2014 © 2014 Kayla Amber Brownell All Rights Reserved SUBCORTICAL BEETLE COMMUNITIES OF GEORGIA by KAYLA AMBER BROWNELL Major Professor: Kamal J.K. Gandhi Committee: Joseph V. McHugh S. Kristine Braman Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2014 iv DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my grandmother, Mary Deyter.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 11 a Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae Article 7 (Coleoptera), Part 1: Bibliography
    Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 11 A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae Article 7 (Coleoptera), Part 1: Bibliography 1-1-1987 R–S Stephen L. Wood Life Science Museum and Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 Donald E. Bright Jr. Biosystematics Research Centre, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 51A 0C6 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Wood, Stephen L. and Bright, Donald E. Jr. (1987) "R–S," Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs: Vol. 11 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm/vol11/iss1/7 This Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 1 1987 Wood. Bricht: Catalog Bibliography R 479 R *R. L. K. 1917. Margborrens harjningar i vara skogar, ' Volga semidesert], Trud lusl Lc 18:10 Skogvaktaren 1917:224. (). 0- P. 1948. Borkenkaferbefall R. im Bezirk Bade... Allge- 1962. The length ol the passages and ihe numbci meine Forst- unci Holzwirtschaftliche Zeitung of offspring of bark beetles depending on the den- 59:193-194. (en). sity ol the settlemenl (using Kholodl n •Rabaglia, Robert 1980. Scoh/- J. Twig-crotch feeding by pine sliool beetle as an example |In Russian] tus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and Akademiia NaukSSSR, Laboratoriia Lesovedeniia evaluation ofinsecticides for control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native and Introduced Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of Michigan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) Anthony I
    2009 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 101 The Native and Introduced Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of Michigan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) Anthony I. Cognato1, Nicolas Barc1, Michael Philip2, Roger Mech3, Aaron D. Smith1, Eric Galbraith1, Andrew J. Storer4, and Lawrence R. Kirkendall5 Abstract Our knowledge of the biogeography of Scolytinae of eastern temperate North America is very patchy. We used data from hand collecting, trapped material (from 65 of 83 counties), and museum collections, supplemented by literature records, to compile a list comprising 107 bark beetle species in 45 genera for Michigan, a state with an especially rich diversity of woody plants. We provide detailed collection data documenting 32 species not previously cata- logued for Michigan, 23 of which are new state records; the genera Trypophloeus and Trischidias are reported from Michigan for the first time. Fifteen Michigan scolytines are not native to North America; Ambrosiodmus rubricollis (Eich- hoff), Crypturgus pusillus (Gyllenhal), Euwallacea validus (Eichhoff), Xyleborus californicus Wood, Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) have not previously been found in the state. We report Michigan hosts for 67 species, including 49 new host associations for the 93 native species. Despite identifying over 4000 specimens for this study, we fully expect to find many more species: over 30 additional species occur in the Great Lakes region. ____________________ Faunistic studies are a first step towards a deeper understanding of the ecology of local biotic communities. These studies provide records of diversity and serve as reference points for the assessment of faunal differences due to time, space, or environmental conditions. To increase the understanding of regional scolytine faunas, we present a study begun in 1978 of the bark and ambrosia beetles of Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 53 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2020 December 2020 Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A. Haack USDA Forest Service, [email protected] Bill Ruesink [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Forest Biology Commons Recommended Citation Haack, Robert A. and Ruesink, Bill 2020. "Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 53 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol53/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Haack and Ruesink: Coleoptera Collected at Grass River Natural Area 138 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 53, Nos. 3–4 Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A. Haack1, * and William G. Ruesink2 1 USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite F, Lansing, MI 48910 (emeritus) 2 Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820 (emeritus) * Corresponding author: (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Overall, 409 Coleoptera species (369 identified to species, 24 to genus only, and 16 to subfamily only), representing 275 genera and 58 beetle families, were collected from late May through late September 2017 at the Grass River Natural Area (GRNA), Antrim Coun- ty, Michigan, using baited multi-funnel traps (210 species), pitfall traps (104 species), and sweep nets (168 species).
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Nursery Inspections, Forest Insect/Plant Pest Surveys
    The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 123 HUNTINGTON STREET BOX 1106 NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06504 Founded 1875 Putting science to work for society CONNECTICUT REPORT TO THE EASTERN PLANT BOARD - 2014 PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY SUMMARY OF 2013 NURSERY INSPECTIONS, FOREST INSECT/PLANT PEST SURVEYS ~~~~~~~~~~ NURSERY INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION Three-hundred five nurseries were certified to conduct intra- and interstate business. There were 671 nursery inspections during the growing season. NURSERY INSECTS and DISEASES. The most important diseases and pests found in nurseries (in order of prevalence) were boxwood blight, aphids on various trees and shrubs, boxwood leaf miner, imported willow leaf beetle, and lily leaf beetle. JAPANESE BEETLE CERTIFICATION. We observed treatments of 7 plants at one nursery and issued phytosanitary certificates to comply with states that quarantine nursery stock from Connecticut because of the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica. Four nurseries met other requirements of the United States Japanese Beetle Harmonization Plan and shipped 2,332 plants to states that quarantine plants from Connecticut. JAPANESE BEETLE CERTIFICATION TO CANADA. Eight Connecticut nurseries, which met the inspection requirements of the US/Canada Japanese Beetle Harmonization Plan, shipped 24,401 plants to Canada in 2013. NURSERY DEALER PERMITS. Nursery dealer permits were issued to 157 firms. One-hundred twenty three of these companies operate individual outlets. The remaining businesses have more than one outlet each. In total,
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Bark and Ambrosia Beetles Reveals Multiple Origins of Fungus Farming During Periods of Global Warming Bjarte H Jordal1* and Anthony I Cognato2
    Jordal and Cognato BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:133 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/133 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Molecular phylogeny of bark and ambrosia beetles reveals multiple origins of fungus farming during periods of global warming Bjarte H Jordal1* and Anthony I Cognato2 Abstract Background: Fungus farming is an unusual life style in insects that has evolved many times in the wood boring weevils named ‘ambrosia beetles’. Multiple occurrences of this behaviour allow for a detailed comparison of the different origins of fungus farming through time, its directionality, and possible ancestral states. We tested these hypotheses with a phylogeny representing the largest data set to date, nearly 4 kb of nucleotides from COI, EF-1α, CAD, ArgK, 28S, and 200 scolytine taxa. Results: Phylogenetic analyses using Bayesian or parsimony approaches placed the root of Scolytinae close to the tribe Scolytini and Microborus, but otherwise indicated low resolution at older nodes. More recent clades were well resolved, including ten origins of fungus farming. There were no subsequent reversals to bark or phloem feeding in the fungus farming clades. The oldest origin of fungus farming was estimated near 50 Ma, long after the origin of Scolytinae (100-120 Ma). Younger origins included the species rich Xyleborini, dated to 21 Ma. Sister group comparisons and test of independence between traits indicated that neither gregarious larval feeding nor regular inbreeding by sibling mating was strongly correlated with the origin of fungus farming. Conclusion: Origins of fungus farming corresponded mainly with two periods of global warming in the Cenozoic era, which were characterised by broadly distributed tropical forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Community Structure in Northeastern and Central Minnesota
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 44 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2011 Numbers 3 & Article 3 4 - Fall/Winter 2011 October 2011 Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Community Structure in Northeastern and Central Minnesota Jesse A. Pfammatter University of Wisconsin David R. Coyle University of Georgia Ann M. Journey University of Minnesota Tiffany L. Pahs Minnesota Department of Agriculture John C. Luhman Minnesota Department of Agriculture See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Pfammatter, Jesse A.; Coyle, David R.; Journey, Ann M.; Pahs, Tiffany L.; Luhman, John C.; Cervenka, Valerie J.; and Koch, Robert L. 2011. "Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Community Structure in Northeastern and Central Minnesota," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 44 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol44/iss2/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Community Structure in Northeastern and Central Minnesota Authors Jesse A. Pfammatter, David R. Coyle, Ann M. Journey, Tiffany L. Pahs, John C. Luhman, Valerie J. Cervenka, and Robert L. Koch This peer-review article is available in The Great Lakes Entomologist: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol44/iss2/3 Pfammatter et al.: Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Community Str 2011 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 163 Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Community Structure in Northeastern and Central Minnesota Jesse A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects Vol. 7, Part 11 CLASSIFICATION AND BIOLOGY OF BRACONID WASPS (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE) M. R. Shaw and T. Huddleston ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON flandbooksforthe Identification of British Insects Vol. 7, Part 11 Editors: W. R. Dolling & R. R. Askew CLASSIFICATION AND BIOLOGY OF BRACONID WASPS (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE) By M. R. Shaw Department of Natural History, Royal Museum of Scotland, Edinburgh EHllJF. and T. Huddleston / Department of Entomology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD. 1991 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON The aim of the Handbooks is to provide illustrated identification keys to the insects of Britain, together with concise morphological, biological and distributional information. The series also includes a Check List of British Insects. Each part should serve both as an introduction to a particular group of insects and as an identification manual. Details of handbooks currently available can be obtained from Publications Sales, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD. World List abbreviation: Handbk !dent. Br. Insects ©Royal Entomological Society of London, 1991 First published 1991 by the British Museum (Natural History) at TheN atural History Museum, London ISBN 0 901546 77 1 Photoset by Row land Phototypesetting Ltd Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Ltd, at the Dorset Press, Dorchester, Dorset Contents Page Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A
    Haack and Ruesink: Coleoptera Collected at Grass River Natural Area 138 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 53, Nos. 3–4 Coleoptera Collected Using Three Trapping Methods at Grass River Natural Area, Antrim County, Michigan Robert A. Haack1, * and William G. Ruesink2 1 USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite F, Lansing, MI 48910 (emeritus) 2 Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St, Champaign, IL 61820 (emeritus) * Corresponding author: (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract Overall, 409 Coleoptera species (369 identified to species, 24 to genus only, and 16 to subfamily only), representing 275 genera and 58 beetle families, were collected from late May through late September 2017 at the Grass River Natural Area (GRNA), Antrim Coun- ty, Michigan, using baited multi-funnel traps (210 species), pitfall traps (104 species), and sweep nets (168 species). All three collecting methods were used in three distinct habitats: a rich conifer swamp (cedar), near the edge of a red pine plantation (pine), and within a mesic northern hardwood forest (hardwoods). Additional collections were made along two trails and in an open field by sweep netting only. Of the 409 species, 322 were collected in one or more of the cedar, hardwoods, and pine habitats, and 152 were collected along the two trails and the grassland site. Of the 322 species collected in the three main habitats, 40 species (36 genera and 14 families) were collected in all three habitats, 105 species (80 genera and 32 families) were collected in the cedar, 176 (131 genera and 38 families) in the hardwoods, and 199 (158 genera and 47 families) in the pine habitats.
    [Show full text]