Environmental Assessment of a Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V Marcus G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment of a Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V Marcus G Environmental Assessment of a Marine Geophysical Survey by the R/V Marcus G. Langseth in the central Gulf of Alaska, June 2011 Prepared for United States Geological Survey Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center 345 Middlefield Rd. Menlo Park, CA 94025 and National Science Foundation Division of Ocean Sciences 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 725 Arlington, VA 22230 by LGL Ltd., environmental research associates 22 Fisher St., POB 280 King City, Ont. L7B 1A6 14 January 2011 Revised 15 April 2011 LGL Report P1198-1 Environmental Assessment for a USGS GOA Seismic Survey, 2011 Page ii Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................... viii I. PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING PROPOSED ACTION ..................................................................................... 2 Proposed Action ................................................................................................................................. 2 (1) Project Objectives and Context .......................................................................................... 2 (2) Proposed Activities ............................................................................................................. 2 (3) Monitoring and Mitigation Measures ................................................................................. 6 Alternative Action: Another Time .................................................................................................... 13 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 13 III. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................... 14 Oceanography ................................................................................................................................... 14 Marine Mammals .............................................................................................................................. 15 (1) Mysticetes ......................................................................................................................... 15 (2) Odontocetes ...................................................................................................................... 24 (3) Pinnipeds .......................................................................................................................... 30 (4) Marine Fissiped ................................................................................................................ 33 Sea Turtles ........................................................................................................................................ 34 (1) Leatherback turtle ............................................................................................................. 34 (2) Green turtle ....................................................................................................................... 35 Seabirds ............................................................................................................................................ 36 (1) Kittlitz’s Murrelet ............................................................................................................. 36 (2) Marbled Murrelet ............................................................................................................. 37 (3) Yellow-billed Loon .......................................................................................................... 37 (4) Steller’s Eider ................................................................................................................... 38 (5) Short-tailed Albatross ....................................................................................................... 38 Fish Resources .................................................................................................................................. 39 Essential Fish Habitat and Habitat Areas of Particular Concern ...................................................... 41 Commercial Fisheries ....................................................................................................................... 41 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES...................................................................................................... 44 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................................... 44 (1) Direct Effects and Their Significance on Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles .................. 44 (2) Mitigation Measures for Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles ............................................ 59 (3) Numbers of Marine Mammals that Could be “Taken by Harassment” ............................ 60 (4) Conclusions for Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles ......................................................... 65 (5) Direct Effects on Fish, Fisheries, and EFH and Their Significance ................................. 66 (6) Direct Effects on Invertebrates and Their Significance .................................................... 69 (7) Direct Effects on Seabirds and Their Significance ........................................................... 70 Environmental Assessment for a USGS GOA Seismic Survey, 2011 Page iii Table of Contents (8) Indirect Effects on Marine Mammals, Sea Turtles, Seabirds, and Their Significance ................................................................................................................. 72 (9) Possible Effects on Subsistence Hunting and Fishing ...................................................... 72 (10) Cumulative Effects ......................................................................................................... 74 (11) Unavoidable Impacts ...................................................................................................... 78 (12) Coordination with Other Agencies and Processes .......................................................... 78 Alternative Action: Another Time .................................................................................................... 79 No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................................... 79 V. LIST OF PREPARERS ................................................................................................................................ 80 VI.LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................................................ 81 Marine Mammals and Acoustics ...................................................................................................... 81 Sea Turtles, Seabirds, Fish, and Other ............................................................................................ 106 APPENDIX A: ACOUSTIC CALIBRATION AND MODELING OF SESIMIC ACOUSTIC SOURCES ON THE R/V LANGSETH (20072008) .................................................................................................... 117 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 117 2. Modeling Langseth Airgun Arrays for Mitigation .................................................................... 117 3. Comparing Modeling with Measurements ................................................................................ 119 4. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 123 5. Literature Cited .......................................................................................................................... 123 APPENDIX B: REVIEW OF THE EFFECTS OF AIRGUN SOUNDS ON MARINE MAMMALS ......................... 124 1. Categories of Noise Effects ....................................................................................................... 124 2. Hearing Abilities of Marine Mammals ...................................................................................... 124 2.1 Toothed Whales (Odontocetes) ...................................................................................... 125 2.2 Baleen Whales (Mysticetes) ........................................................................................... 125 2.3 Seals and Sea Lions (Pinnipeds) .................................................................................... 126 2.4 Manatees and Dugong (Sirenians) ................................................................................. 126 2.5 Sea Otter and Polar Bear ................................................................................................ 127 3. Characteristics of Airgun Sounds .............................................................................................. 127 4. Masking Effects of Airgun Sounds ........................................................................................... 129 5. Disturbance by Seismic Surveys ..............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Fin Whale…………24 Sperm Whale…………26 Humpback Whale…………28 North Atlantic Right Whale…………30 Blue Whale…………32
    PURA VIDA Puerto Vueltas. Valle Gran Rey. La Gomera www.lagomerapuravida.com !1 PURA VIDA Puerto Vueltas. Valle Gran Rey. La Gomera www.lagomerapuravida.com INDEX CETACEANS…………4 TYPES OF CETACEANS…………5 Common bottlenose dolphin…………6 Short-finned pilot whale…………8 Long-finned pilot whale…………9 Atlantic spotted dolphin…………11 Rough-toothed dolphin…………13 Common dolphin…………15 Cuvier’s beaked whale…………17 Blainville’s beaked whale…………22 Striped dolphin…………20 Bryde’s whale…………22 Fin whale…………24 Sperm whale…………26 Humpback whale…………28 North Atlantic right whale…………30 Blue whale…………32 !2 PURA VIDA Puerto Vueltas. Valle Gran Rey. La Gomera www.lagomerapuravida.com OTHER ANIMALS Great Hammerhead…………35 Sailfish…………37 Loggerhead sea turtle…………39 Leatherback sea turtle…………41 Green sea turtle…………43 Portuguese Man O’War…………45 Common stingray…………47 Round fantail stingray…………49 Cory’s shearwater…………51 Kraken…………53 !3 PURA VIDA Puerto Vueltas. Valle Gran Rey. La Gomera www.lagomerapuravida.com CETACEANS The word cetacean is used to describe all whales, dolphins and porpoises in the order Cetacea. This word comes from the Latin cetus meaning "a large sea animal”, and the Greek word ketos, meaning "sea monster”. - Cetaceans are mammals. - They are warm-blooded (they maintain a constant internal body temperature). - Like other placental mammals, cetaceans give birth to well-developed calves and nurse them with milk from their mammary glands. - Cetaceans have lungs, meaning they breathe air. An individual can last without a breath from a few minutes to over two hours depending on the species. Cetacea are deliberate breathers who must be awake to inhale and exhale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Marine Mammals
    Romero, A. 2009. The Biology of Marine Mammals. The Biology of Marine Mammals Aldemaro Romero, Ph.D. Arkansas State University Jonesboro, AR 2009 2 INTRODUCTION Dear students, 3 Chapter 1 Introduction to Marine Mammals 1.1. Overture Humans have always been fascinated with marine mammals. These creatures have been the basis of mythical tales since Antiquity. For centuries naturalists classified them as fish. Today they are symbols of the environmental movement as well as the source of heated controversies: whether we are dealing with the clubbing pub seals in the Arctic or whaling by industrialized nations, marine mammals continue to be a hot issue in science, politics, economics, and ethics. But if we want to better understand these issues, we need to learn more about marine mammal biology. The problem is that, despite increased research efforts, only in the last two decades we have made significant progress in learning about these creatures. And yet, that knowledge is largely limited to a handful of species because they are either relatively easy to observe in nature or because they can be studied in captivity. Still, because of television documentaries, ‘coffee-table’ books, displays in many aquaria around the world, and a growing whale and dolphin watching industry, people believe that they have a certain familiarity with many species of marine mammals (for more on the relationship between humans and marine mammals such as whales, see Ellis 1991, Forestell 2002). As late as 2002, a new species of beaked whale was being reported (Delbout et al. 2002), in 2003 a new species of baleen whale was described (Wada et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dugong Whales
    C O A S TA L AND MARINE LIFE – ANIMALS: V E RT E B R A T E S – M A M M A L S Dugong 3F he Dugong is one of Africa’s most Biology endangered large mammals and is vulnerable T Dugongs are the only strictly marine mammals that feed to extinction. These animals are plump, grey, primarily on plants. They browse on seagrasses (flowering streamlined creatures that propel themselves plants which are distinct from seaweeds). Dugongs dig up slowly, using a crescent-shaped tail and paired the nutritious rhizomes of seagrasses using a horseshoe- flippers. They are almost naked of hair and have shaped disc at the end of the snout. Stiff curved bristles on the snout rake up and manoeuvre the food, which is then a blunt nose, small eyes and lack external ears. ‘chewed’ between rough horny pads on the upper and lower Like whales and dolphins they never leave the palates. Adults have only a few peg-like molar teeth located water. They are found throughout the shallow at the back of the jaws. They are not ruminant herbivores, but warmer coastal waters of the Indian Ocean from they do have an extremely long intestine with a large midgut northern Australia to Mozambique and (caecum) with paired blind-ending branches in which bacterial occasionally venture into KwaZulu-Natal. digestion of cellulose occurs. They may consume up to 25% of their body weight per day. In Moreton Bay, Australia, dugongs eat quantities of ascidians (sea squirts), which are rich in nitrogen needed for the production of proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 December 2011 List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies
    13 December 2011 List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies The Ad-Hoc Committee on Taxonomy, chaired by Bill Perrin, has produced the first official SMM list of marine mammal species and subspecies. Consensus on some issues was not possible; this is reflected in the footnotes. This list is revisited and possibly revised every few months reflecting the continuing flux in marine mammal taxonomy. This version was updated on 13 December 2011. This list can be cited as follows: “Committee on Taxonomy. 2011. List of marine mammal species and subspecies. Society for Marine Mammalogy, www.marinemammalscience.org, consulted on [date].” This list includes living and recently extinct species and subspecies. It is meant to reflect prevailing usage and recent revisions published in the peer-reviewed literature. Author(s) and year of description of the species follow the Latin species name; when these are enclosed in parentheses, the species was originally described in a different genus. Classification and scientific names follow Rice (1998), with adjustments reflecting more recent literature. Common names are arbitrary and change with time and place; one or two currently frequently used in English and/or a range language are given here. Additional English common names and common names in French, Spanish, Russian and other languages are available at www.marinespecies.org/cetacea/. Based on molecular and morphological data, the cetaceans genetically and morphologically fall firmly within the artiodactyl clade (Geisler and Uhen, 2005), and therefore we include them in the order Cetartiodactyla, with Cetacea, Mysticeti and Odontoceti as unranked taxa (recognizing that the classification within Cetartiodactyla remains partially unresolved -- e.g., see Spaulding et al., 2009, Price et al., 2005; Agnarsson and May-Collado, 2008)1.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of Fin Whale in the Northern Pacific
    GROWTH OF FIN WHALE IN THE NORTHERN PACIFIC SEIJI (KIMURA) OHSUMI, MASAHARU NISHIWAKI AND TAKASHI HIBIYA* On the growth of the fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus, Linn.), Mac­ kintosh & Wheeler (1929) reported first in detail for the southern stock At that time, however, available age characters were not yet known. Therefore, chiefly on the age of the whale, their paper was incomplete. They pointed out the possibility of the number of ovulations and ossifi­ cation of vertebral column as age characters. Wheeler (1930) developed this method and classified several groups by means of the number of ovulations. Peters (1939) calculated the number of ovulations in each breeding season. Ruud (1940, 1945) discovered the age determination for whales by means of baleen plates. And then Tomilin (1945), Nishiwaki (1950, 195la) and Utrecht (1956) advanced this method. Furthermore Nishiwaki (1951b) showed the colourlation of crystalline lens as an age character. These age characters, however, are somewhat incomplete. In 1955, Purves discovered lamination in the core of the ear plug. This is now regarded as the best age character for baleen whales. Then, Laws & Purves (1956) and Nishiwaki (1957) studied the age of baleen whales chiefly fin whales using the number of the laminations. On investigations of life history for the southern fin whales, many reports have been presented. On the other hand, the studies of growth for the northern fin whale have been relatively scanty. The reason will be that the whales caught in northern hemisphere have been relatively rare and so we have not been blessed with chances of investigation of whales.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Whales
    TheThe GreatGreat WhalesWhales AA CurriculumCurriculum forfor GradesGrades 6–96–9 VICKI OSIS AND SUSAN LEACH SNYDER, RACHEL GROSS, BILL HASTIE, BETH BROADHURST OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MARINE MAMMAL PROGRAM The Great Whales This curriculum was produced for the Oregon State University Marine Mammal Institute Dr. Bruce Mate, Project Director Acknowledgments Contributions and assistance from the following people and organizations made production of this curriculum possible. Copyright © 2008 Oregon State University Marine Mammal Institute Funded by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ocean Explorer Program Artists Reviewers Assistance with Pieter Folkens Barbara Lagerquist scientific data Laura Hauck David Mellinger Dr. Douglas Biggs Tai Kreimeyer Sharon Nieukirk Dr. John Chapman Craig Toll Dr. William Kessler Reviewers/writers Dr. Bruce Mate Photography/illustrations Beth Broadhurst International fund for Animal Bill Hastie Field testers/reviewers Welfare Susan Leach Snyder Jesica Haxel San Diego Natural History Rachel Gross John King Museum Tracie Sempier Design, layout, Christian Tigges Cover photo and editing Eugene Williamson Pieter Folkens Cooper Publishing Theda Hastie Contents 1. Purpose of the Curriculum ...................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction to Whales ............................................................................................. 5 Activity 1: Whale Facts ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. List of Abbreviations and Symbols
    Appendix 1. List of Abbreviations and Symbols Adgb Androglobin HPNS High-pressure nervous syndrome ADL Aerobic dive limit IAP Internal acoustic pinna atm Air pressure in units of atmo- J Joules spheres. 1 atm = 760 mmHg or kPa Kilopascal 101.3 kPa L Liter ATP Adenosine triphosphate LCT Lower critical temperature BAT Brown adipose tissue LDH Lactate dehydrogenase BMR Basal metabolic rate Mb Myoglobin CO2 Carbon dioxide MCH Mean corpuscular Hb Cd Nondimensional drag coefficient MCV Mean corpuscular volume CS Citrate synthase MLDB Monkey lips/dorsal bursae CSF Cerebral spinal fluid mmHg Millimeters of mercury; a unit Cybg Cytoglobin of pressure often used in physi- D Total drag (pressure drag plus ology when referring to the friction drag) pressure or partial pressure of a DCS Decompression sickness gas DPPC Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine MPa Megapascal EEG Electroencephalogram Mya Millions of years ago FFA Free fatty acids Ngb Neuroglobin FPRs Formyl peptide receptors O2 Oxygen GbE Globin E OML Oxygen minimum layer GbX Globin X OR Odorant Receptors genes GbY Globin Y ρ Density of seawater (~1024 GFR Glomerular filtration rate kg m−3) Hb Hemoglobin P50 Oxygen partial pressure at 50% HC Conductive and convective heat saturation of Hb exchange Pa (Pascal) The SI (International System of Hct Hematocrit Units) unit of pressure HE Evaporative heat loss PCO2 Partial pressure of carbon dioxide HM Metabolic heat production PN2 Partial pressure of nitrogen HR Radiation heat exchange PO2 Partial pressure of oxygen HS Heat storage ORs Odorant receptors HOAD β-Hydroxyacyl coenzyme A Re Reynolds number dehydrogenase RMR Resting metabolic rate © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 R.
    [Show full text]
  • 06 September 2011 List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies the Ad-Hoc Committee on Taxonomy, Chaired by Bill Perrin, Has P
    06 September 2011 List of Marine Mammal Species and Subspecies The Ad-Hoc Committee on Taxonomy, chaired by Bill Perrin, has produced the first official SMM list of marine mammal species and subspecies. Consensus on some issues was not possible; this is reflected in the footnotes. This list is revisited and possibly revised every few months reflecting the continuing flux in marine mammal taxonomy. This version was updated on 6 September 2011. This list can be cited as follows: “Committee on Taxonomy. 2011. List of marine mammal species and subspecies. Society for Marine Mammalogy, www.marinemammalscience.org, consulted on [date].” This list includes living and recently extinct species and subspecies. It is meant to reflect prevailing usage and recent revisions published in the peer-reviewed literature. Author(s) and year of description of the species follow the Latin species name; when these are enclosed in parentheses, the species was originally described in a different genus. Classification and scientific names follow Rice (1998), with adjustments reflecting more recent literature. Common names are arbitrary and change with time and place; one or two currently frequently used in English and/or a range language are given here. Additional English common names and common names in French, Spanish, Russian and other languages are available at www.marinespecies.org/cetacea/. Based on molecular and morphological data, the cetaceans genetically and morphologically fall firmly within the artiodactyl clade (Geisler and Uhen, 2005), and therefore we include them in the order Cetartiodactyla, with Cetacea, Mysticeti and Odontoceti as unranked taxa (recognizing that the classification within Cetartiodactyla remains partially unresolved -- e.g., see Spaulding et al., 2009, Price et al., 2005; Agnarsson and May-Collado, 2008)1.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Physiology of the Resident Population of Fin Whales in the Gulf of California
    INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS REPRODUCTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF THE RESIDENT POPULATION OF FIN WHALES IN THE GULF OF CALIFORNIA TESIS QUE PARA OBTENER EL GRADO DE DOCTORADO EN CIENCIAS MARINAS PRESENTA ERICA CARONE LA PAZ, B.C.S., DICIEMBRE DE 2019 ----.J SIP-14 INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL SECRETARIA DE INVESTIGACiÓN Y POSGRADO ACTA DE REVISiÓN DE TESIS En la Ciudad de La Paz, S .C.S., siendo las 12:00 horas del dfa 17 del mes de Octubre del 2019 se reunieron los miembros de la Comisión Revisora de Tesis designada por el Colegio de Profesores de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación de CICIMAR para examinar la tesis titulada : "REPRODUCflVE PHYSIOLOGY OF THE RESIDENT POPULATION OF FIN WHALES IN THE GULF OF CALIFORNIA" Presentada por el a'lumno: CARONE ERICA Apellido paterno matemo nombre(r­s) ----,-r-----,--,--,----,--, Con registro: I B I 1 I 5 I o o I 8 4 Aspirante de: DOCTORADO EN CIENCIAS MARINAS Después de intercambiar opiniones los miembros de la Comisión manifestaron APROBAR LA DEFENSA DE LA TESIS, en virtud de que satisface los requisitos señalados por las disposiciones reglamentarias vigentes. LA COMISION REVISORA D;,"ct~ "~RON LANIEL ~ \~ »~' V •. ' DR. JAIM~TGun..REZ DRA. CLAUD>AJANETL OE..ANDE> CAMACHO S. /lt¡{¿Uó-Il DRA. SHANNON KATHILEEN CROWELL ATKINSON OF¡50RES DR. SE INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL SECRETARíA DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y POSGRADO CARTA CESIÓN DE DERECHOS En la Ciudad de La Paz, 8.C.S., el día 28 del mes de ___O~c~~==~e~_ del año 2019 El (la) que suscribe ___________-.:...M~e=-:n=__:::C;..c.E=-:Rc::I:...;:C;:..:A=---C::cA.::;:R"-O;:..:N:..:.E=--___________ Alumno (a) del Programa DOCTORADO EN CIENCIAS MARINAS con número de registro 8150084 adscrito al CENTRO INTERDISCIPLlNARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS manifiesta que es autor(a) intelectual del presente trabajo de tesis, bajo la dirección de: DRA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in Cetacean Life History Energetics
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231952068 All creatures great and smaller: A study in cetacean life history energetics Article in Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK · August 2007 DOI: 10.1017/S0025315407054720 CITATIONS READS 76 381 1 author: Christina Lockyer Age Dynamics 128 PUBLICATIONS 2,870 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Age estimation in marine mammals using Growth Layers in hard tissues View project Population dynamics of the Icelandic grey seal View project All content following this page was uploaded by Christina Lockyer on 30 August 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2007), 87, 1035–1045 doi: 10.1017/S0025315407054720 Printed in the United Kingdom All creatures great and smaller: a study in cetacean life history energetics Christina Lockyer North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO), Polar Environmental Centre, N9296 Tromsø, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] This paper reviews some specific studies of cetacean life history energetics over the past 20–30 y that include one of the largest species, the baleen fin whale, Balaenoptera physalus, the medium-sized odontocete long-finned pilot whale, Globicephala melas, and one of the smallest marine odontocetes, the harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena. Attention is drawn to the decrease in longevity with size and the differences in biological parameters that reflect this and affect life history strategy and energy utilization. Data from the past whaling industry in Iceland for fin whales, the Faroese ‘grindedrap’ for pilot whales, and by-catches as well as some live captive studies for harbour porpoise have been used.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessement of Communication in Antarcic Marine Mammals By
    TEXTE 03/2021 Ressortforschungsplan of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety Project No. (FKZ) 3714. 19 101 0 Final report Assessment of communication masking in Antarctic marine mammals by underwater sound from airguns by Dr. Benno Wölfing, Prof. Dr. Marianne Rasmussen, Dr. Tobias Schaffeld, Dr. Joseph Schnitzler, Prof. Prof. h. c. Dr. Ursula Siebert Institut für Terrestrische und Aquatische Wildtierforschung (ITAW) Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover (TiHo), Büsum, Germany Dr. Peter Stilz Freelance Biologist Germany Prof. Dr. Alexander Gavrilov, Prof. Dr. Christine Erbe, Prof. Dr. Robert McCauley Centre for Marine Science and Technology, Curtin University, Kent St., Bentley, Western Australia (CMST) Prof. Dr. Magnus Wahlberg University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark (SDU) Matthias Fischer, Max Schuster, Dr. Dietrich Wittekind DW-ShipConsult GmbH, Schwentinental, Germany (DWSC) On behalf of the German Environment Agency Imprint Publisher Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Report performed by: Institut für Terrestrische und Aquatische Wildtierforschung (ITAW) Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover (TiHo) Werftstrasse, 6 25761 Büsum Germany Report completed in: March 2021 Edited by: Section II 2.2 Protection of the Polar Regions Mirjam Müller Publication as pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4804 Dessau-Roßlau, March 2021 The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the author(s). Abstract: Assessment of communication masking in Antarctic marine mammals by underwater sound from airguns Airguns used in seismic explorations and scientific surveys produce high-intensity impulsive sounds with most energy concentrated in the low frequency band.
    [Show full text]
  • Balaenoptera Physalus – Fin Whale
    Balaenoptera physalus – Fin Whale by Clarke (2004). Similarly, there is no genetic evidence to support the claim of the southern hemisphere subspecies. Assessment Rationale Most of the global decline over the last three generations is attributable to the major decline in the southern hemisphere. Most specifically, between the 1930s and 1960s Fin Whales were severely overexploited by commercial whaling in the Southern Ocean. There is no recent data documenting the current population status of this species, since the surveys that have been conducted in the southern hemisphere do not cover their entire summer distribution. There is no indication that they have recovered to levels anywhere near those prior to exploitation (which was estimated at 200,000), however Regional Red List status (2016) Endangered A1d* the population is expected to be increasing. National Red List status (2004) Data Deficient The analysis in this assessment estimates that the global Reasons for change Non-genuine change: population has declined by more than 70% over the last New information three generations (1935–2013). The cause of the reduction, commercial whaling, has ceased, and they are Global Red List status (2013) Endangered A1d regularly observed in polar waters where there do not TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None appear to be any current major threats to this species. The national assessment for this species is considered in line CITES listing (1981) Appendix 1 with that of the global assessment, and since the majority Endemic No of the decline is attributable to the southern hemisphere, this species is listed as Endangered A1d. However, more *Watch-list Data current data on population size and trends for the Of all baleen whales, Fin Whales are the fastest Southern Ocean are needed and this species should be and were very rarely caught before the reassessed once such data become available.
    [Show full text]