DOCSLIB.ORG

Elr Data File - Swm2 South Wales Main Line (Gloucester Yd Jn - Neyland)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ELR DATA FILE - SWM2 SOUTH WALES MAIN LINE (GLOUCESTER YD JN - NEYLAND) www.railwaydata.co.uk M. Ch. Type Name Details ID 113m 11ch Bridge Millstream Subway Underline Bridge | Steel 113 11 113m 13ch Bridge River Twyver - Also Under Chl At 92 78. Over Stream Underline Bridge | Steel 113 13 113m 44ch Bridge Windmill - Eastern Radial Road Over. Glos C.c. Own & Maintain - Agmt.rt510 Overline Bridge | Steel 113 44 114m 04ch Station Gloucester GCR 114m 07ch Bridge Gloucester Stn Fb - Footbridge | Steel 114 07 114m 12ch Bridge Station Subway Underline Bridge | Steel 114 12 114m 22ch Bridge London Road Underbridge Underline Bridge | Steel 114 21.25 114m 32ch Bridge Worcester Street Underbridge - Single Span. A38 Under Underline Bridge | Steel 114 32 114m 35ch Bridge Hare Lane Underbridge - Single Span Underline Bridge | Brick 114 35 114m 36ch Bridge Park Street Underbridge - Single Span Underline Bridge | Brick 114 36 114m 47ch Bridge Deans Walk - Closed To Vehicular Traffic Underline Bridge | Brick (Arch) 114 47 114m 54ch Bridge Over Road On Up Side. (fb Not On Nr Land - No Exams) Side of Line Bridge | Steel 114 54 B/S 114m 54ch Bridge "st.oswalds Road - Headroom 16'0""" Underline Bridge | Steel 114 54 115m 02ch Bridge St Catherines Viaduct 7 Spans Viaduct | Pre-cast Concrete 115 02 115m 07ch Bridge Pump House - River Severn (eastern Arm) Underline Bridge | Pre-tensioned Concrete 115 07 115m 16ch Bridge Ham Viaduct - 12 Spans (pre Cast Segmental Concrete Arches Over Land) Viaduct | Pre-cast Concrete 115 16 115m 31ch Bridge Townham Single Span (a417 Over. Outside Party - Visual Only) Overline Bridge | Steel 115 31 115m 36ch Bridge Flood Arches Viaduct | Brick 115 36 115m 43ch Bridge Over Viaduct Viaduct | Steel 115 43 116m 03ch Crossing Keenes Private User worked Crossing with Telephone - 116m 13ch Bridge Redundant? Underline Bridge | Steel 116 12.5 B/U 116m 28ch Crossing Over Farm Public Footpath Crossing - 116m 41ch Bridge Underline Bridge Underline Bridge | Brick 116 40.5 116m 46ch Crossing Pooles Private User worked Crossing with Telephone - 116m 65ch Bridge Underline Bridge Underline Bridge | Brick 116 65 117m 02ch Crossing Hygrove Public Footpath Crossing - 113m 3ch -286 113m 11ch -178 113m 78ch LEVEL 114m 10ch +352 114m 19ch +99 114m 24ch LEVEL 114m 30ch -95 114m 43ch -130 114m 49ch -116 114m 56ch +504 115m 6ch LEVEL 115m 10ch -119 115m 34ch +187 115m 43ch LEVEL 115m 49ch -705 115m 66ch -330 115m 72ch LEVEL 116m 38ch +220 1 (SWM2 113.03 - 117.05) M. Ch. Type Name Details ID Highnam - Aka Downe's. A48 Over. Gcc Own & Maintain - 117m 06ch Bridge Overline Bridge | Brick 117 06 Agmt.94747m 117m 39ch Bridge Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 117 39 117m 65ch Bridge Underline Bridge Underline Bridge | Brick 117 65 117m 67ch Bridge Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 117 67 118m 00ch Crossing Churcham Court Public Footpath Crossing - 118m 17ch Crossing Lower Barn Private User worked Crossing with Telephone - 118m 17ch Crossing Lower Barn Public Footpath Crossing - 118m 55ch Bridge Black Bridge - Weight Restriction 10 Tons Laden Overline Bridge | Pre-cast Concrete 118 55 118m 69ch Crossing Churcham 66 Public Footpath Crossing - 119m 18ch Bridge Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 119 18 119m 20ch Crossing Clay Hill Public Footpath Crossing - 119m 35ch Bridge Oakle Street - Overline Bridge | Brick / Brick 119 35 119m 59ch Crossing Oakle Street 1 Public Footpath Crossing - 119m 62ch Bridge 8' Dog-leg Armco Pipe Over Stream Underline Bridge | Steel 119 62 120m 01ch Crossing Hooks Farm Public Footpath Crossing - Public Highway Manually Controlled Barriers (locally monitored 120m 21ch Crossing Ley - by CCTV) 120m 40ch Crossing Westbury On Severn Public Footpath Crossing - 120m 50ch Crossing Broken Cross Farm 1 Private User worked Crossing with Telephone - 120m 66ch Crossing Broken Cross Public Footpath Crossing with Whistleboards - 120m 66ch Crossing Broken Cross Public Highway User worked Crossing with Minature Stop Lights - 117m 19ch -335 118m 9ch +462 118m 47ch -391 119m 5ch +367 119m 34ch -547 119m 60ch LEVEL 119m 72ch +238 120m 27ch +817 2 (SWM2 117.05 - 121.05) M. Ch. Type Name Details ID 121m 48ch Bridge Grange Court Road - 2 Spans Overline Bridge | Stone 121 48 122m 10ch Crossing Westbury On Severn Public Highway Automatic Half Barriers - 122m 21ch Crossing Longcroft Farm Public Footpath Crossing - 122m 45ch Bridge Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 122 45 122m 51ch Crossing Westbury Brook Public Footpath Crossing - 122m 52ch Bridge Westbury Brook - Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 122 52 122m 72ch Bridge "blaisdon Road - Headroom 13'3""" Underline Bridge | Brick 122 72 122m 78ch Bridge "westbury Road - A48 Under. Headroom 15'3"" (m)" Underline Bridge | Brick 122 78 123m 25ch Bridge Elton Court - Underline Bridge | Brick 123 24.5 123m 29ch Bridge Elton Brook - Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 123 29 Elton Meadow - Accomn With Public F/p Under. Diverted From 123m 33ch Bridge Underline Bridge | Brick 123 33 123 29 123m 54ch Bridge Pound Farm - Underline Bridge | Pre-tensioned Concrete 123 54 123m 75ch Crossing Broad Oak Public Footpath Crossing with Whistleboards - Private User worked Crossing with Telephone with 123m 76ch Crossing Broad Oak - Whistleboards 124m 05ch Bridge "broad Oak - A48 Under. Headroom 14'3""(m)" Underline Bridge | Steel 124 05 124m 25ch Bridge Mayos - Underline Bridge | Brick 124 25 124m 30ch Bridge Mayos Brook - Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 124 30 124m 39ch Bridge Hide Farm - Underline Bridge | Brick 124 39 124m 44ch Bridge Newnham - Underline Bridge | Brick 124 44 125m 04ch Bridge Blewitts Road - Overline Bridge | Brick 125 04 121m 34ch LEVEL 121m 46ch -449 121m 75ch LEVEL 122m 10ch +1039 122m 66ch LEVEL 122m 75ch -351 123m 18ch -495 123m 35ch -1452 123m 41ch LEVEL 123m 62ch +304 124m 1ch LEVEL 124m 12ch +264 3 (SWM2 121.05 - 125.05) M. Ch. Type Name Details ID 125m 04ch Bridge Blewitts Road - Overline Bridge | Brick 125 04 125m 08ch Tunnel Newnham Tunnel 125m 08ch - 125m 19ch (0.14 miles) - 125m 26ch Bridge Grant Field - Overline Bridge | Brick (Arch) 125 26.5 125m 47ch Bridge "ruddle Road - A48 Under. Headroom 14'3""" Underline Bridge | Brick 125 47 125m 56ch Bridge Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 125 56 126m 38ch Bridge Bullo Dock Viaduct Viaduct | Stone 126 38.5 126m 54ch Bridge Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 126 54 126m 74ch Bridge Overline Bridge Overline Bridge | Brick 126 74 127m 34ch Bridge Awre Road - Overline Bridge | Brick 127 34 127m 73ch Bridge Hall Farm - Underline Bridge | Brick 127 73 128m 06ch Bridge Charity - Underline Bridge | Brick 128 06 128m 08ch Bridge Charity - Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 128 08 128m 15ch Crossing Awre 15 Public Footpath Crossing - 128m 20ch Bridge Blackpool Brook - Over Cinderford Brook Underline Bridge | Brick (Arch) 128 20 128m 22ch Crossing Awre Public Highway Manually Controlled Barriers (locally monitored by CCTV) - 128m 46ch Bridge Hewletts Road - Overline Bridge | Steel 128 46 125m 15ch +311 125m 51ch -316 127m 66ch LEVEL 128m 66ch -373 4 (SWM2 125.05 - 129.05) M. Ch. Type Name Details ID 129m 07ch Crossing Awre 87 Public Footpath Crossing with Whistleboards - 129m 45ch Bridge Milk Maid Head Road - Underline Bridge | Stone 129 45 129m 47ch Crossing Milkmaid Head Private Footpath Crossing with Whistleboard - 129m 60ch Bridge Gatcombe Pill - Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 129 60.25 129m 61ch Crossing Gatcombe Private Footpath Crossing with Whistleboards - 129m 64ch Bridge Gatcombe - Over Road And Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 129 64 129m 68ch Bridge Gatcombe - Over Road And Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 129 68 130m 03ch Bridge Gatcombe Wood - Underline Bridge | Brick 130 03 130m 36ch Bridge Purton Pill - Aka Lanes Brook Underline Bridge | Steel 130 36 130m 40ch Bridge Purton Passage - Underline Bridge | Steel 130 40 130m 65ch Crossing Aldridge Private User worked Crossing with Telephone - 131m 23ch Bridge Millhouse Wood - Part Blocked / Filled Up (r.10/7/00) Underline Bridge | Brick 131 23 131m 78ch Bridge Cliff Farm - Weight Restriction 23t. But To Be Reviewed Overline Bridge | Early Steel 131 78 132m 19ch Crossing Plumbers Farm Public Footpath Crossing with Whistleboards - 132m 37ch Crossing Naas Public Highway Automatic Half Barriers - 132m 72ch Crossing Lydney Public Footpath Crossing with Whistleboard - 129m 15ch -568 129m 32ch LEVEL 130m 14ch +186 130m 45ch LEVEL 131m 31ch +272 131m 46ch +168 131m 71ch LEVEL 132m 3ch -198 132m 36ch -264 132m 76ch LEVEL 5 (SWM2 129.05 - 133.05) M. Ch. Type Name Details ID 133m 38ch Station Lydney LYD Public Highway Manually Controlled Barriers (locally monitored by 133m 40ch Crossing Lydney - CCTV) 133m 40ch Bridge Lydney Road - Not Used By Vehicles Underline Bridge | Pre-tensioned Concrete 133 40.25 133m 41ch Bridge Lydney Canal - Om 133 42 Underline Bridge | Brick 133 41 133m 42ch Bridge Canal Feeder - Underline Bridge | Brick 133 42.5 133m 45ch Bridge Underline Bridge Underline Bridge | Steel 133 44.75 133m 72ch Crossing Garlands 1 Private User worked Crossing with Telephone - 134m 26ch Bridge Garlands - Overline Bridge | Brick 134 26 134m 51ch Bridge Aylburton Wharf - Underline Bridge | Cast in-situ reinforced Concrete 134 51 134m 53ch Bridge Aylburton - Aka Stockwell Brook. Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 134 53 134m 53ch Crossing Stockwell Lane Private User Worked Crossing - 134m 58ch Bridge Warth Brook - Aka Aylburton Brook. Over Stream Underline Bridge | Brick 134 58.75 134m 59ch Bridge Court - Underline Bridge | Cast in-situ reinforced Concrete 134 59 134m 77ch Bridge Court Brook - Over Stream Underline Bridge | Steel 134 77 135m 04ch Crossing Hardacre 2 Private User worked Crossing with Telephone - 135m 08ch Crossing Alvington 17 Public Footpath Crossing - Court Brook - Over Stream. With Service Pipe 135m 15ch Bridge Underline Bridge | Steel 135 15 Through 135m 38ch Crossing Alvington 18 Public Footpath Crossing - 135m 39ch Bridge Cone Brook - Aka Mickla Brook.
Recommended publications
  • RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE and IMPROVED PASSENGER SERVICE COMMITTEE INTERIM REPORT March 2006

    RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE and IMPROVED PASSENGER SERVICE COMMITTEE INTERIM REPORT March 2006

    RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPROVED PASSENGER SERVICE COMMITTEE INTERIM REPORT March 2006 RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPROVED PASSENGER SERVICE COMMITTEE INTERIM REPORT March 2006 If you would like further copies of this report or a version in the following formats (large print, Braille, audio cassette or compact disk), please contact: Leanne Hatcher Rail Infrastructure and Improved Passenger Services Committee National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Tel: 029 2089 8429 E-mail: [email protected] Committee Members John Marek AM (Chair) Wrexham Leighton Andrews AM Rhondda Eleanor Burnham AM North Wales Rosemary Butler AM Newport West Janet Davies AM South Wales West Lisa Francis AM Mid & West Wales Carl Sargeant AM Alyn & Deeside Secretariat Chris Reading Committee Clerk Sarah Bartlett Deputy Clerk Leanne Hatcher Team Support Contents Page Number 1. Introduction 1 2. Roles and Responsibilities 2 3. Strategic Planning 8 4. Key Issues 9 5. What happens next? 14 Annexes 1. Schedule of Committee Papers 2. Verbatim Record of Committee Meetings 3. Consultation Letter 4. Schedule of Organisations Consulted 5. Summary of Consultation Responses 6. Structure of Welsh Rail Passenger Industry 7. Map of Rail Network 1. Introduction Background 1.1 The committee was established, in accordance with Standing Order 8.1, by a motion (NDM2735) that was approved by plenary on 6 December 2005. This motion set parameters for committee membership, terms of reference and various other matters; including the requirement to report to the National Assembly by the end of March and to terminate on 19 May 2006. 1.2 The committee held its inaugural meeting on 1 February 2006 to agree various procedural matters, including the election of the Chair.
  • Xxxxxx Xxxxxx

    Xxxxxx Xxxxxx

    xxxxxx xxxxxx Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Regulation 5(2)(l) VOLUME 5: FOLDER 3 Natural Features Report Document 5.4 www.tidallagoonswanseabay.com www.tidallagoonswanseabay.com Tidal Lagoon Swansea Bay plc Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................... 2 1.2 The Proposed Development ................................................ 4 1.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 4 1.2.2 Consenting Process .................................................................... 5 1.3 Natural Features Assessment ............................................... 5 1.4 Statutory and non-statutory sites or features of nature conservation ...................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................... 6 2.2 Zone of Influence ............................................................... 7 2.3 Construction ...................................................................... 7 2.4 Operation .......................................................................... 8 2.5 Decommissioning ............................................................... 8 2.6 Natural Features within the Zone of Influence ....................... 8 2.7 Assessment of Effects Prior to Mitigation ...........................
  • Uhvlghqwldo Frpphufldo

    Uhvlghqwldo Frpphufldo

    UHVLGHQWLDO FRPPHUFLDO DXFWLRQ FDWDORJXH :DOHV :HVW&RXQWU\ 7KXUVGD\0D\ SP 6RXWK:DOHV 7KXUVGD\0D\SP EX\HU V SOHDVHQRWHȋ SURRIRILGHQWLW\ 'XHWRFKDQJHVLQWKH$QWL0RQH\ /DXQGHULQJUHJXODWLRQVDQ\RQHZLVKLQJ WRELGRQDQ\SURSHUW\ZLOOEHUHTXLUHG WRUHJLVWHUDWQRFRVWSULRUWRWKHVDOHLQ WKHURRPDQGSURGXFHWZRIRUPVRIWKH IROORZLQJLGHQWL̰FDWLRQ Ȋ3KRWRJUDSKLFSDVVSRUWRUGULYLQJOLFHQFH Ȋ$GGUHVVFXUUHQWXWLOLW\ELOOEDQN VWDWHPHQWHWF ,I\RXDUHVXFFHVVIXOLQSXUFKDVLQJD SURSHUW\\RXZLOOEHDVNHGE\WKHFDVKLHUWR SURGXFH\RXULGHQWL̰FDWLRQDQGWKHVHZLOO WKHQEHSKRWRFRSLHG GHSRVLWV :HDFFHSWVWHUOLQJXSWRe &KHTXHVDQG%DQNHUV'UDɓVEXW &$1127$&&(37&5(',7 '(%,7&$5'6 FRPSOLPHQWDU\ SDUNLQJDYDLODEOH DXFWLRQGHWDLOV M4 M4 M4 30 A48(M) Pentwyn A48 29a St Mellons Llanrumney A48 A470 A469 Llanedeyrn Park Inn Hotel A48 Gabalfa Flyover A48 Newport Rd Cardiff 7KH3DUN,QQ+RWHO 7KXUVGD\0D\ SP &LUFOH:D\(DVW/ODQHGH\UQ &DUGL̯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̰HOG&ZPEUDQ &DWEUDLQ/DQH%ULVWRO E2[IRUG6WUHHW0RXQWDLQ$VK )ODW/RQGRQ5RDG3HPEURNH'RFN %ULGJH6WUHHW3RQW\SULGG 'RQDOG6WUHHW&DUGL̯
  • Newsletter - No

    Newsletter - No

    Neath and Tennant Canals Trust Quarterly Newsletter - No. 125 September 2008 'Thomas Dadford' on a quiet September morning. NEATH & TENNANT CANALS TRUST LTD. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 2007 - 2008. Again this year I can report that with the continuing close working relationship between the Trust and the Neath Canal Navigation Co. much has been achieved in continuing the progress ofrestoration ofthe Neath Canal. Current Activity. Following a meeting ofthe stakeholders seeking the Restoration ofAberdulais Aqueduct, of which the Trust is a member, a brief was developed by Opus International Consultants (UK) Ltd, for the Assessment of the Feasibility of Rehabilitation of Aberdulais Aqueduct. Funding to carry out lhe study is being sought by the Tennant Canal Co. along with CADW, and funding for the study should be in place during 2008 -2009. Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council along with the City and County of Swansea and the Welsh Assembly have appointed Hyder and Bridge Economics to undertake a socio economic benefit analysis of restoring the eath and Tennant Canals to navigation. A draft report has already been submitted to the Local Authorities and Welsh Assembly and agreed in principle, the final report is now awaited. Groundwork Trust has secured funding to design and install features promoting the canal corridor between Tonna and Aberdulais. The N&TC Trust was approached to help with the content of scenes depicting local history to be carved on slate panels for inclusion into a new wall being built overlooking the canal at St Annes Terrace, Tonna. The new wall is the initial projectto improve and promote the canal in the Aberdulais area.
  • Wales: River Wye to the Great Orme, Including Anglesey

    Wales: River Wye to the Great Orme, Including Anglesey

    A MACRO REVIEW OF THE COASTLINE OF ENGLAND AND WALES Volume 7. Wales. River Wye to the Great Orme, including Anglesey J Welsby and J M Motyka Report SR 206 April 1989 Registered Office: Hydraulics Research Limited, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX1 0 8BA. Telephone: 0491 35381. Telex: 848552 ABSTRACT This report reviews the coastline of south, west and northwest Wales. In it is a description of natural and man made processes which affect the behaviour of this part of the United Kingdom. It includes a summary of the coastal defences, areas of significant change and a number of aspects of beach development. There is also a brief chapter on winds, waves and tidal action, with extensive references being given in the Bibliography. This is the seventh report of a series being carried out for the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. For further information please contact Mr J M Motyka of the Coastal Processes Section, Maritime Engineering Department, Hydraulics Research Limited. Welsby J and Motyka J M. A Macro review of the coastline of England and Wales. Volume 7. River Wye to the Great Orme, including Anglesey. Hydraulics Research Ltd, Report SR 206, April 1989. CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 COASTAL GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY 3.1 Geological background 3.2 Coastal processes 4 WINDS, WAVES AND TIDAL CURRENTS 4.1 Wind and wave climate 4.2 Tides and tidal currents 5 REVIEW OF THE COASTAL DEFENCES 5.1 The South coast 5.1.1 The Wye to Lavernock Point 5.1.2 Lavernock Point to Porthcawl 5.1.3 Swansea Bay 5.1.4 Mumbles Head to Worms Head 5.1.5 Carmarthen Bay 5.1.6 St Govan's Head to Milford Haven 5.2 The West coast 5.2.1 Milford Haven to Skomer Island 5.2.2 St Bride's Bay 5.2.3 St David's Head to Aberdyfi 5.2.4 Aberdyfi to Aberdaron 5.2.5 Aberdaron to Menai Bridge 5.3 The Isle of Anglesey and Conwy Bay 5.3.1 The Menai Bridge to Carmel Head 5.3.2 Carmel Head to Puffin Island 5.3.3 Conwy Bay 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 REFERENCES BIBLIOGRAPHY FIGURES 1.
  • Route Utilisation Strategy November 2008  Foreword

    Route Utilisation Strategy November 2008  Foreword

    Wales Route Utilisation Strategy November 2008 2 Foreword I am delighted to present Network Rail’s Route Principally this is in south Wales, where capacity Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Wales. This use is at its highest. This is a result of a growth covers the entire rail network in Wales, as well in the number of trains serving Cardiff and the as some parts of the network in the English building of a number of new stations. On this border counties. part of the network, in the most populous part of the country, the RUS builds on the successful This network is extensive and diverse. past introduction of more services and the There are main line links from Wales into selective growth of the network. England, a long-distance line along the border connecting north and south Wales, a busy A major programme to renew signalling urban passenger network serving Cardiff, and equipment in the Newport and Cardiff areas branches traversing sparsely populated rural will take place in the next five to seven years, areas. Some parts of the network are subject and much of the work described in this to fluctuating demand according to the time of strategy to enhance the network is planned year, most notably on the Cambrian Coast and in conjunction with this signalling work to in the Conwy Valley. increase cost-effectiveness. The High Level Output Specification (HLOS), published in The context in which this RUS has been July 2007, contained a specific requirement to produced, as has often been the case with increase seating capacity into Cardiff during other RUSs, is one of growing demand for the morning peak.
  • Structural Steel Design Awards 2014

    Structural Steel Design Awards 2014

    Structural Steel Design Awards 2014 Sponsored by: The British Constructional Steelwork Association Ltd and Tata Steel SSDA 2014 SPONSORS The British Constructional Steelwork Association Ltd 4 Whitehall Court, Westminster, Tata Steel London SW1A 2ES PO Box 1, Brigg Road, Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire DN16 1BP Tel: 020 7747 8121 Fax: 020 7747 8199 Tel: 01724 405060 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.steelconstruction.org Website: www.tatasteelconstruction.com INTRODUCTION In this challenging environment we see, yet again, The judges have been particularly impressed an outstanding set of projects for this year’s with the sense of boldness and innovation that Structural Steel Design Awards scheme. has been applied to all of the projects, as the teams search for different ideas and approaches The spread of projects on the selected shortlist in order to achieve the optimum solution for the of 12, reflects the broad appeal of steelwork in client, the public and society. construction, both geographically and in types of sector. This year the projects cover an array of The projects, particularly the winners, will prove jobs, from horses heads to a Walkie Talkie, as inspirational as we move forward into a well as an imaginative house, a heavy railway better climate and environment for the viaduct, a school, an arena, a leisure centre, industry. As always, the Structural Steel Design a hotel, a visitor centre and various bridges and Awards scheme provides a showcase for transport facilities.
  • Openness & Accountability Mailing List

    Openness & Accountability Mailing List

    Openness & Accountability Mailing List AINA Amateur Rowing Association Anglers Conservation Association APCO Association of Waterway Cruising Clubs British Boating Federation British Canoe Union British Marine Federation Canal & Boat Builder’s Association CCPR Commercial Boat Operators Association Community Boats Association Country Landowners Association Cyclist’s Touring Club Historic Narrow Boat Owners Club Inland Waterways Association IWAAC Local Government Association NAHFAC National Association of Boat Owners National Community Boats Association National Federation of Anglers Parliamentary Waterways Group Rambler’s Association The Yacht Harbour Association Residential Boat Owner’s Association Royal Yachting Association Southern Canals Association Steam Boat Association Thames Boating Trades Association Thames Traditional Boat Society The Barge Association Upper Avon Navigation Trust Wooden Canal Boat Society ABSE AINA Amber Valley Borough Council Ash Tree Boat Club Ashby Canal Association Ashby Canal Trust Association of Canal Enterprises Aylesbury Canal Society 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council B&MK Trust Barnsley, Dearne & & Dover Canal Trust Barnet Borough Council Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Bassetlaw District Council Bath North East Somerset Council Bedford & Milton Keynes Waterway Trust Bedford Rivers Users Group Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Boat Museum Society Chair Bolton Metropolitan Council Borough of Milton Keynes Brent Council Bridge 19-40
  • Ommatoiulus Moreleti (Lucas) and Cylindroiulus

    Ommatoiulus Moreleti (Lucas) and Cylindroiulus

    Bulletin of the British Myriapod & Isopod Group Volume 30 (2018) OMMATOIULUS MORELETI (LUCAS) AND CYLINDROIULUS PYRENAICUS (BRÖLEMANN) NEW TO THE UK (DIPLOPODA, JULIDA: JULIDAE) AND A NEW HOST FOR RICKIA LABOULBENIOIDES (LABOULBENIALES) Steve J. Gregory1, Christian Owen2, Greg Jones and Emma Williams 1 4 Mount Pleasant Cottages, Church Street, East Hendred, Oxfordshire, OX12 8LA, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2 75 Lewis Street, Aberbargoed. CF8 19DZ, UK. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The schizophylline millipede Ommatoiulus moreleti (Lucas) and the cylindroiuline millipede Cylindroiulus pyrenaicus (Brölemann) (Julida: Julidae) are recorded new for the UK from a site near Bridgend, Glamorganshire, in April 2017. An unidentified millipede first collected in April 2004 from Kenfig Burrows, Glamorganshire, is also confirmed as being C. pyrenaicus. Both species are described and illustrated, enabling identification. C. pyrenaicus is reported as a new host for the Laboulbeniales fungus Rickia laboulbenioides. Summary information is provided on habitat preferences of both species in South Wales and on their foreign distribution and habitats. It is considered likely that both species have been unintentionally introduced into the UK as a consequence of industrial activity in the Valleys of south Wales. INTRODUCTION The genera Ommatoiulus Latzel, 1884 and Cylindroiulus Verhoeff, 1894 (Julida: Julidae) both display high species diversity (Kime & Enghoff, 2017). Of the 47 described species of Ommatoiulus the majority are found in North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula (ibid). Currently, just one species, Ommatoiulus sabulosus (Linnaeus, 1758), is known from Britain and Ireland, a species that occurs widely across northern Europe (Kime, 1999) and in Britain reaches the northern Scottish coastline (Lee, 2006).
  • It Unione Europea

    It Unione Europea

    UNIONE EUROPEA IL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO IL CONSIGLIO Strasburgo, 12 dicembre 2006 (Or. en) 1997/0335 (COD) PE-CONS 3629/1/06 LEX 721 REV 1 TRANS 188 MAR 70 CODEC 734 DIRETTIVA DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO E DEL CONSIGLIO CHE FISSA I REQUISITI TECNICI PER LE NAVI DELLA NAVIGAZIONE INTERNA E CHE ABROGA LA DIRETTIVA 82/714/CEE DEL CONSIGLIO PE-CONS 3629/1/06 REV 1 IT DIRETTIVA 2006/87/CE DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO E DEL CONSIGLIO del 12 dicembre 2006 che fissa i requisiti tecnici per le navi della navigazione interna e che abroga la direttiva 82/714/CEE del Consiglio IL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO E IL CONSIGLIO DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea, in particolare l'articolo 71, paragrafo 1, vista la proposta della Commissione, visto il parere del Comitato economico e sociale europeo 1, previa consultazione del Comitato delle regioni, deliberando secondo la procedura di cui all'articolo 251 del trattato 2, 1 GU C 157 del 25.5.1998, pag. 17. 2 Parere del Parlamento europeo del 16 settembre 1999 (GU C 54 del 25.2.2000, pag. 79), posizione comune del Consiglio del 23 febbraio 2006 (GU C 166 E del 18.7.2006, pag. 1), posizione del Parlamento europeo del 5 luglio 2006 (non ancora pubblicata nella Gazzetta ufficiale) e decisione del Consiglio del 23 ottobre 2006. PE-CONS 3629/1/06 REV 1 1 IT considerando quanto segue: (1) La direttiva 82/714/CEE del Consiglio, del 4 ottobre 1982, che fissa i requisiti tecnici per le navi della navigazione interna 1, ha introdotto condizioni armonizzate per il rilascio dei certificati tecnici per le navi della navigazione interna in tutti gli Stati membri, che però non consentono la navigazione sul Reno.
  • Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Control Period 4

    Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Control Period 4

    Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Control Period 4 October 2007 Contents Contents Executive summary 1 1 The strategic context 20 2 The demand for rail 25 3 The industry strategy 33 4 Network Rail’s policies and strategies 52 5 Efficiency and input prices 84 6 Our plan for CP4 119 7 Expenditure and financing 171 8 Outputs 174 9 Options and sensitivities 194 10 Summary of future developments 201 Appendices 204 Network Rail October 2007 Strategic Business Plan 1 Executive summary summary Executive Executive summary The last review was therefore necessary to place the business on a secure financial footing so that The demand for both passenger and freight rail we could begin to address these problems services has increased dramatically over the last together with our industry partners in Control decade. Last year alone, total passenger Period 3 (CP3). demand increased by more than eight per cent and freight demand has also continued to grow Change is a gradual process not just in the strongly. railway but elsewhere as well. Despite this, we are approaching the 2008 periodic review from a Moreover, there is a clear consensus throughout very different position compared to the last the industry that demand growth from review. We always said that the early years of passengers and freight users will remain strong Network Rail were about stabilising the company for the foreseeable future. Increasing congestion while preparing for the further challenges ahead on roads and increasing environmental sensitivity and we have now largely completed the first two mean that rail should be well placed to continue phases of our three-phase transformation winning market share.
  • Incorporating Acorp Annual Report 2012-2013

    Incorporating Acorp Annual Report 2012-2013

    Train Times incorporating ACoRP Annual Report 2012-2013 The magazine of Summer/Autumn 2013 the Association of Community Rail Partnerships No.68 NEW LOOK EDITION featuring: A better way to the Heart of Wales? * Community Rail in Scotland The arrival of Citizens’ Rail * Reviving Etchingham In this issue… Hello and Welcome... Hello & Welcome 2 North of the Border 3 Welcome to the first issue of our new-style Train Times! Citizens’ Rail 5 With more in-depth features about community rail and Up The Junction 9 the work of Community Rail Partnerships, we’re sure you’ll find it absorbing and informative. The content Reviving Etchingham 10 isn’t set in stone and we’d welcome features from our Partnership Profile - readers, as well as our regular contributors, so let us Heart of Wales 12 know what you think. The financial climate, like the weather, still appears to Principal Funders be a bit chilly as I write this, although I’m encouraged and Sponsors by the continued support for community rail from our many friends and colleagues in the industry. Underlining this is an interesting comment from a Association of Train Operating significant delegate at our recent ‘Stations’ conference in Birmingham. When Companies I asked if he’d enjoyed the conference, he was generous enough to say that he DfT Rail found it useful and thought-provoking. Frighteningly however, he then went East Coast Main Line Co on to say “You shouldn’t be doing this”. My eyebrows must have given me Network Rail away because he rapidly qualified his comment by adding “Community rail Welsh Government volunteers should be doing far better things than scrabbling around for no- ticeboards and the like – we (the industry) have set the bar too low, these kind Transport Scotland of things should be the norm”.