Understanding Why Sibling Abuse Remains Under the Radar and Pathways to Outing Amy B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding Why Sibling Abuse Remains Under the Radar and Pathways to Outing Amy B Molloy College DigitalCommons@Molloy Faculty Works: Social Work 2015 Notes from the Field: Understanding Why Sibling Abuse Remains Under the Radar and Pathways to Outing Amy B. Meyers Ph.D., LCSW-R Molloy College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/swk_fac Part of the Social Work Commons DigitalCommons@Molloy Feedback Recommended Citation Meyers, Amy B. Ph.D., LCSW-R, "Notes from the Field: Understanding Why Sibling Abuse Remains Under the Radar and Pathways to Outing" (2015). Faculty Works: Social Work. 2. https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/swk_fac/2 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Molloy. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Works: Social Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Molloy. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Notes from the Field: Understanding Why Sibling Abuse Remains Under the Radar and Pathways to Outing Professional Development: Journal: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education Notes from the Field: Understanding Why Sibling Abuse Remains Under Article Title: the Radar and Pathways to Outing Author(s): Amy Meyers Volume and Issue Number: Vol.18 No.2 Manuscript ID: 182024 Page Number: 24 Year: 2015 Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education is a refereed journal concerned with publishing scholarly and relevant articles on continuing education, professional development, and training in the field of social welfare. The aims of the journal are to advance the science of professional development and continuing social work education, to foster understanding among educators, practitioners, and researchers, and to promote discussion that represents a broad spectrum of interests in the field. The opinions expressed in this journal are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the policy positions of The University of Texas at Austin’s School of Social Work or its Center for Social and Behavioral Research. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education is published two times a year (Spring and Winter) by the Center for Social and Behavioral Research at 1923 San Jacinto, D3500 Austin, TX 78712. Our website at www.profdevjournal.org contains additional information regarding submission of publications and subscriptions. Copyright © by The University of Texas at Austin’s School of Social Work’s Center for Social and Behavioral Research. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. ISSN: 1097-4911 URL: www.profdevjournal.org Email: www.profdevjournal.org/contact Notes from the Field: Understanding Why Sibling Abuse Remains Under the Radar and Pathways to Outing Amy Meyers The identification of sibling abuse is development sets the precedent to insinuate that imperative to the emotional well-being of the abuse from a sibling also poses serious effects. victim, the perpetrator, and the family system. This has been confirmed by research which has Sibling abuse has been identified as the most documented the long-term ramifications of common form of family violence (Button, Parker, sibling abuse (Caffaro & Conn-Caffaro, 1998; & Gealt, 2008; Reid & Donovan, 1990). It occurs Meyers, 2011; Wiehe, 1991). more frequently than parent-child abuse or Parent-Child Abuse spousal abuse (Graham-Bermann, Cutler, It has been established that emotional, Litzenberger, & Schwartz, 1994), yet it remains physical, and sexual abuse have adverse effects largely unaddressed in the literature and on the developing child that continues into subsequently under the radar of child welfare, adulthood. The perpetrator of abuse exploits the social service providers, and mental health emotional dependence of the victim and fuels practitioners. feelings of helplessness and rage in an effort to Highlighted in this paper is the need for those deliberately eradicate or compromise the child’s working in the field of mental health and social separate identity (Shengold, 1989). Childhood service to detect sibling abuse and its significant abuse manifests in problems with peers, and detrimental impact. The aim of this paper is aggression, social withdrawal, isolation (Ferrara, to broaden awareness of sibling abuse through the 2002; Trickett & McBride-Change, 1995; Briere, distinction of sibling abuse from normative 1992), depression, anxiety, conduct problems, sibling relational behavior and consider factors and deficits in intellectual and academic which prevent sibling abuse from gaining functioning (Ammerman, Cassisi, Hersen, & Van attention. Pathways to expanding knowledge of Hasselt, 1986). It has been reported that sibling abuse and integrating a sibling abuse physically abused children are significantly more framework is proposed to arm educators, aggressive than non-abused children (Feldman, practitioners, and child welfare staff to take Salzinger, Rosario, Alvarado, Caraballo, & action. Hammer, 1995; Kinard, 1980; Trickett, 1993) and have more difficulty with trust and separation Sibling Relations and Abuse as a (Kinard, 1982). Significant Force Childhood physical abuse is also linked to The effects of sibling abuse (Caffaro & Conn- adult violence towards dating partners, self- Caffaro, 1998; McLaurin, 2005; Simonelli, injurious and suicidal behavior, nonviolent Mullis, Elliott, & Pierce, 2002; Wiehe, 1990) are criminal behavior, and interpersonal problems in underscored by research on the detrimental adulthood (Malinosky-Rummel & Hansen, 1993). impact of parent-child abuse on self-esteem Adults who experience physical abuse as children (Colman & Widom, 2004; Godbout, Lussier, & are also more likely to abuse their own children Sabourin., 2006) and the culmination of evidence (Kalmuss, 1984; Straus, Gelles, & Steinmetz, on the influence of siblings on development 1980). (Cicerelli, 1995; Leader, 2007). Knowledge that Since the sibling relationship is a critical and siblings are one’s most important peers (Leader, formative relationship, and the effects of parent- 2007; Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2010) and that child abuse are well established, it is obvious that parent-child abuse compromises psychosocial the effects of sibling abuse may have equal or Amy Meyers, Ph.D., LCSW, is an assistant professor at Molloy College 24 Notes from the Field: Sibling Abuse greater significance for the victim as parent-child uncomfortable (Meyers, 2011). As a result, abuse. Parents, who are protectors of their victims develop conforming and pleasing children, overtly or covertly allow the sibling behavior. In an unconscious manner, victims of abusive relationship to exist. Whether sibling abuse tend to repeat attachments to new partners abuse is allowed or abstractly supported, it that have familiar characteristics to that of the produces a double-whammy whereby the victim abusive relationship. This results in not only experiences abuse from their sibling, but unconsciously – or consciously – attaching to parental neglect as well. Furthermore, the emotionally unavailable partners, which feeds similarity in consequences of parent-child incest into their low self-esteem and creates a cyclical and sibling sexual abuse highlights the associated process whereby they desire but do not expect distress from any abusive dyadic family they are capable or worthy of obtaining emotional relationship. nourishment through relationships (Meyers, Sibling Abuse 2011). As important agents of socialization and self- Sibling abuse is a pervasive and detrimental perception, sibling relationships also influence experience for the victim with long-term self-esteem (Lewis & Fremouw, 2001). An interpersonal implications. However, it often gets emotionally denigrating or physically violent overlooked as normative sibling rivalry due to a experience elicits vulnerability to one’s well- lack of understanding of the distinction. Amongst being. With low self-esteem, an individual many differences, sibling abuse is non-normative potentially lacks assertiveness, social skills, and behavior whereas sibling rivalry is a the ability to resolve interpersonal conflict, developmental and growth-inducing experience. resulting in a susceptibility to either victimization or perpetration of aggressive behavior (Lewis & Sibling Abuse is Not Sibling Rivalry Fremouw, 2001). The focus of this paper is to heighten Studies on sibling abuse have found that awareness of sibling abuse as a phenomenon in victims suffer from depression, anger with the need of recognition by mental health perpetrator, and difficulty with interpersonal professionals, mandated reporters, and child relationships (Meyers, 2011; Wiehe, 1991). welfare workers, and offer pathways to broaden Survivors report being “overly” sensitive and awareness. Towards this aim, a clear and distinct engage in self-blame (Wiehe, 1991). They definition of sibling abuse is needed. describe problems in relationships with the Defining Sibling Abuse and Distinguishing it opposite sex, including repeating the victim role from Sibling Rivalry in relationships, feeling distrustful, fearful, and One contributing factor to the oversight of suspicious (Meyers, 2011; Wiehe, 1991). Some sibling abuse is its lack of definition both legally experience symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress and in the empirical research. Studies on sibling Disorder, eating disorders, and alcohol and violence, aggression, and abuse often use the substance abuse (Wiehe, 1991). terms “conflict,” “rivalry,” “aggression,”
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Dysfunctional Families: One Central Theme in Two Fictional
    Revista Folios ISSN: 0123-4870 [email protected] Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Colombia Gómez R., Luís Fernando Dysfunctional Families: One Central Theme in Two Fictional Works of Tony Morrison, Song of Solomon and Sula Revista Folios, núm. 29, enero-junio, 2009, pp. 119-128 Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=345941359010 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Dysfunctional Families: One Central Theme in Two Fictional Works of Tony Morrison, Song of Solomon and Sula Familias Disfuncionales: Un Tema Central en Dos Novelas de Toni Morrison, Canción de Salomón y Sula Luís Fernando Gómez R. Abstract Toni Morrison, Nobel Prize winner (1993), has been recognized as one of the most prominent novelists in the USA today. Her novels Song of Solomon and Sula rank enormous and original literary creativity through which she shows what it means to survive as an individual in the black families of America. Hence, this article explores the desperation and vulnerabilities of children who grow up in dysfunctional families and how they experience trauma and pain from their parents’ unconventional actions and behaviors. The article accounts of the irregular experiences that the main characters of these two novels have to confront at hostile homes as they grow up changed, different from other children, and lack the essential educational guidance that prepare them for adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • Placement of Children with Relatives
    STATE STATUTES Current Through January 2018 WHAT’S INSIDE Placement of Children With Giving preference to relatives for out-of-home Relatives placements When a child is removed from the home and placed Approving relative in out-of-home care, relatives are the preferred placements resource because this placement type maintains the child’s connections with his or her family. In fact, in Placement of siblings order for states to receive federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance, federal law under title Adoption by relatives IV-E of the Social Security Act requires that they Summaries of state laws “consider giving preference to an adult relative over a nonrelated caregiver when determining a placement for a child, provided that the relative caregiver meets all relevant state child protection standards.”1 Title To find statute information for a IV-E further requires all states2 operating a title particular state, IV-E program to exercise due diligence to identify go to and provide notice to all grandparents, all parents of a sibling of the child, where such parent has legal https://www.childwelfare. gov/topics/systemwide/ custody of the sibling, and other adult relatives of the laws-policies/state/. child (including any other adult relatives suggested by the parents) that (1) the child has been or is being removed from the custody of his or her parents, (2) the options the relative has to participate in the care and placement of the child, and (3) the requirements to become a foster parent to the child.3 1 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Reunification Experiences After Sibling Incest
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Doctorate in Social Work (DSW) Dissertations School of Social Policy and Practice Spring 5-14-2012 Moving Families to Future Health: Reunification Experiences After Sibling Incest Bianca M. Harper University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations_sp2 Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Bianca M., "Moving Families to Future Health: Reunification Experiences After Sibling Incest" (2012). Doctorate in Social Work (DSW) Dissertations. 26. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations_sp2/26 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations_sp2/26 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Moving Families to Future Health: Reunification Experiences After Sibling Incest Abstract MOVING FAMILIES TO FUTURE HEALTH: REUNIFICATION EXPERIENCES AFTER SIBLING INCEST Bianca M. Harper Lina Hartocollis, Ph.D Sibling incest is an under-reported, under-researched social problem that devastates affected families and challenges social workers and other professionals who work with them. There is little research on family experiences and changes in family dynamics after sibling incest and even less on the reunification experiences of families after sibling incest. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into families’ reunification experiences after sibling incest in order to promote continued healing and improve service delivery. A qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews was conducted with fourteen multidisciplinary professionals involved in family reunification after sibling incest. Grounded theory guided the analysis of interview data. Findings include themes of role of therapist, process of reunification, challenges of multidisciplinary team member collaboration, challenges of ensuring family safety, challenges of determining family readiness, clinical concerns, and lack of a road map.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysfunctional Family Roles in an Effort to 1) Survive and 2) Have a Sense of Stability, the Family Members Will Usually Develop Specific Roles
    Growing Up In a Dysfunctional Family “Dysfunctional simply means that it doesn’t work, but it often looks like it does. In contrast to a functional family, it has been suggested that the dysfunctional family is a dictatorship run by its sickest member. It is one that does not function in a normal, healthy way. The family members are unable to find stability. A dysfunctional family is characterized BY LACK OF BOUNDARIES. We usually think of alcoholism or drug addiction in the family as the primary cause of the dysfunction, but it can also be caused by a variety of other different problems that families face: a serious illness (such as cancer), a death in the family, or mental illness. It can be caused by either an extramarital affair, religious abuse, or other abuses. It can be caused by anything that rocks or stresses the family. Often dysfunction is intergenerational. (means that families pass on what they learn to the next generation and so on. .) The question is no longer, “Did I come from a dysfunctional family?”, but “To what degree was my family dysfunctional? It is not “How dysfunctional was my family?” but , “In what ways was it dysfunctional?” It is not “Did it affect me to come from this family?” but “How did it affect me, what roles did I play and what am I left with now?” It is not “Do I need to do something about my family of origin and the resulting boundary issues?” but “What do I do to address the specific issues resulting from my dysfunctional family of origin?”” O’Neil & Newbold Dysfunctional Family Roles In an effort to 1) survive and 2) have a sense of stability, the family members will usually develop specific roles.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G. Phd, Mphil, Dclinpsychol) at the University of Edinburgh
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. ‘Better Together’: A grounded theory study of social worker decision making in cases involving sexual behaviour between siblings Peter Yates PhD in Social Work – The University of Edinburgh - 2015 Declaration This is to certify that the work contained within has been composed by me and is entirely my own work. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Peter Yates 31st May 2015 ‘Better Together’: A grounded theory study of social worker decision making in cases involving sexual behaviour between siblings Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... vii Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • By Jennifer M. Fogel a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    A MODERN FAMILY: THE PERFORMANCE OF “FAMILY” AND FAMILIALISM IN CONTEMPORARY TELEVISION SERIES by Jennifer M. Fogel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Communication) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Amanda D. Lotz, Chair Professor Susan J. Douglas Professor Regina Morantz-Sanchez Associate Professor Bambi L. Haggins, Arizona State University © Jennifer M. Fogel 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe my deepest gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee – Dr. Susan J. Douglas, Dr. Bambi L. Haggins, and Dr. Regina Morantz-Sanchez, who each contributed their time, expertise, encouragement, and comments throughout this entire process. These women who have mentored and guided me for a number of years have my utmost respect for the work they continue to contribute to our field. I owe my deepest gratitude to my advisor Dr. Amanda D. Lotz, who patiently refused to accept anything but my best work, motivated me to be a better teacher and academic, praised my successes, and will forever remain a friend and mentor. Without her constructive criticism, brainstorming sessions, and matching appreciation for good television, I would have been lost to the wolves of academia. One does not make a journey like this alone, and it would be remiss of me not to express my humble thanks to my parents and sister, without whom seven long and lonely years would not have passed by so quickly. They were both my inspiration and staunchest supporters. Without their tireless encouragement, laughter, and nurturing this dissertation would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Childhood Maltreatment Predictors of Trait Impulsivity
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Psychology Faculty Publications Department of Psychology 5-2015 Childhood Maltreatment Predictors of Trait Impulsivity Tiffany D. Russell Amy Veith Alan R. King University of North Dakota, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/psych-fac Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Russell, Tiffany D.; Veith, Amy; and King, Alan R., "Childhood Maltreatment Predictors of Trait Impulsivity" (2015). Psychology Faculty Publications. 20. https://commons.und.edu/psych-fac/20 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Psychology at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter CHILDHOOD MALTREATMENT PREDICTORS OF TRAIT IMPULSIVITY Tiffany D. Russell, Amy Veith and Alan R. King* University of North Dakota, US ABSTRACT This chapter provides a summary of empirical evidence linking childhood maltreatment and trait impulsivity. While biological contributors to impulsivity may be substantial, this review speculates that childhood and adolescent contributors may potentially alter the developmental trajectory of this personality trait in important ways. An analysis of original data (N = 401) regarding child maltreatment associations (childhood sexual abuse, physical abuse, sibling abuse, peer bullying, corporal punishment, and exposure to domestic violence) with trait impulsivity as measured by the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 was also conducted. Adult respondents were assigned to extreme child abuse categories based on their retrospective self-reports. Co- occurrence rates for the various forms of maltreatment were modest (around 10%).
    [Show full text]
  • Sibling Sexual Abuse
    Sibling Sexual Abuse Introduction This information sheet is designed to provide information for parents and carers concerning sibling sexual abuse and child on child sexual abuse. In addition to seeking emotional support the most frequent questions asked by parents and carers are: • Why didn’t I know? • How do I stop it? • How can I prevent it from happening again? • What can I expect in terms of my child’s development? • What can I do about my child’s behaviour? • What will happen to the abusive child? Once you suspect, have discovered, or it has been disclosed to you that your child has been sexually abused by his or her sibling or another child it is important to have an understanding about what is “normal” sexual development and behaviour in children and teenagers and what behaviours might be a cause for concern. A child’s sexual behaviour is something which develops over a period of time. Expected behaviours (see below) can be a cause for concern if they become excessive; where there is a preoccupation; and/or when it involves other children in inappropriate ways. In such situations, it may be that your child has become sexualised. The term ‘sexualised’ refers to pre-pubescent boys and girls who are or who have been in contact with inappropriate sexual activities. A sexualised or sexually reactive child may engage in a variety of inappropriate sexual behaviours as a result of exposure to sexual experiences and may begin to act out or engage in sexual behaviours or relationships. These include: excessive sexual play, inappropriate comments or gestures and/or mutual sexual activities with same age or older children.
    [Show full text]
  • Parent Tips Protect with Respect What Parents Should Know About Bullying
    Parent Tips Protect with Respect What Parents Should Know About Bullying What is Bullying? The Pinellas County Schools Policy against Bullying and Harassment defines bullying as: Systematically and chronically inflicting physical hurt or psychological distress on one or more students or employees. In bullying situations there are always 3 key elements present: Imbalance of Power Intent to Harm Repeated Behavior There are 4 different types of bullying. Physical –Harm to another’s person or property . Verbal – Taunting, teasing, extortion or threats . Relational Aggression – Harm to another’s self esteem or group acceptance . Sexual Harassment – Inappropriate sexual comments, gestures, or behaviors . Cyberbullying –Using technology to intimidate or harass another person Important Facts to Know . Bullying is not normal play . It will probably not go away by itself, it usually becomes more serious if ignored . Bullying can leave physical and emotional scars . Bullying behavior interferes with a child’s ability to learn . Both boys and girls bully . The number one reason children do not report bullying is that they do not believe that adults will do anything Protect with Respect Bullying Prevention and Intervention Training Program Consequences of bullying go beyond the schoolroom doors. Not only does bullying jeopardize the physical and emotional safety of children at school, it can have lasting effects on all children involved. Children who bully are at an increased risk of substance abuse, academic problems, and trouble with the law. Children who are bullied may suffer from low self-esteem, social isolation, academic problems, substance abuse, depression, and may resort to violence or suicide. You can help prevent bullying! Research shows that bullying incidents can be decreased with intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggression in Siblings Exposed to Domestic Violence by Rose-Marie
    Aggression in Siblings Exposed to Domestic Violence by Rose-Marie Tachie A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Family Social Sciences University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2010 by Rose-Marie Tachie SIBLING AGGRESSION ii Acknowledgements This research project was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) grant to Caroline Piotrowski, Principal Investigator (Award 410-96-0311). I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all those who have directly and indirectly supported me in bringing this thesis to a successful completion. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr. Caroline Piotrowski, for the relentless effort in bringing my academic ambitions to a successful end. Thanks for your patience and kindness, and for believing in me. Sincere thanks to my committee members, Dr. Rosemary Mills and Dr. Hiebert-Murphy. I would not have reached this far in my academic endeavors without your support, expertise and valuable and insightful feedback. I would also like to thank all the professors within and outside this department that I came into contact with, for their enormous support and guidance. Sincere thanks to all my fellow colleagues in the Graduate Room for the continuous support and encouragement throughout my stay. I am also grateful to the administrative staff, Pam, Jodi, Sheri and Margaret. Thanks for the warm and prompt response any time I approached you. I wish to express profound gratitude to my parents and siblings.
    [Show full text]
  • VA/Dod Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    VA/DoD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONCUSSION-MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Defense QUALIFYING STATEMENTS The Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense guidelines are based upon the best information available at the time of publication. They are designed to provide information and assist decision making. They are not intended to define a standard of care and should not be construed as one. Neither should they be interpreted as prescribing an exclusive course of management. This Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of both clinical and epidemiological evidence. Developed by a panel of multidisciplinary experts, it provides a clear explanation of the logical relationships between various care options and health outcomes while rating both the quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendation. Variations in practice will inevitably and appropriately occur when clinicians take into account the needs of individual patients, available resources, and limitations unique to an institution or type of practice. Every healthcare professional making use of these guidelines is responsible for evaluating the appropriateness of applying them in the setting of any particular clinical situation. These guidelines are not intended to represent TRICARE policy. Further, inclusion of recommendations for specific testing and/or therapeutic interventions within these guidelines does not guarantee coverage of civilian sector care. Additional information on current TRICARE benefits may be found at www.tricare.mil or by contacting your regional TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor. Version 2.0 – 2016 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Concussion-mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prepared by: The Management of Concussion-mild Traumatic Brain Injury Working Group With support from: The Office of Quality, Safety and Value, VA, Washington, DC & Office of Evidence Based Practice, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 203: Overview of Child Sexual Abuse
    203 Overview of Child Sexual Abuse A Standard Curriculum Developed By: Cynthia L. King, MSSA, LCSW Revised By: Eugene L. Detter For The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work November 2009 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program University of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work 403 East Winding Hill Road Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 Phone: (717) 795-9048 Fax: (717) 795-8013 203: Overview of Child Sexual Abuse Acknowledgements The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program would like to thank the following people for their assistance in the revision of the workshop 203: Overview of Child Sexual Abuse: Kathleen Davis, The Pennsylvania Kathy Moore, Executive Director of LSW, MSW Child Welfare M.Ed.,LPC, CAC Training Program CASA Allegheny Eugene Detter The Pennsylvania Child County Welfare Training Christine The Pennsylvania Program Reese, MSW Child Welfare Jana Hitchcock The Pennsylvania Child Training Program Welfare Training Carla Sanders, Social Work Program MSW Administrator Janice Miller The Pennsylvania Child Philadelphia Welfare Training Department of Human Program Services Cynthia L. King, Writer Jeanne Schott, The Pennsylvania MSSA, LCSW MSW Child Welfare Joel Miranda The Pennsylvania Child Training Program Welfare Training Gale Sherrid, The Pennsylvania Program MSW Child Welfare Training Program The Training Program would also like to express its appreciation to all the dedicated county/state, public & private child welfare and other related professionals, too numerous to capture here, that assisted with the original version as well as subsequent curriculum revisions and helped make this curriculum a reality. Copyright 2009, The University of Pittsburgh This material is copyrighted by The University of Pittsburgh.
    [Show full text]