DOCSLIB.ORG

State of India's Newborns 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of India's Newborns 2014 ACTION TO E PUBLIC G D E L W W HEALTH O O N N K K FOUNDATION OF INDIA State of India’s NEWBORNS 2014 Individuals in the photo provided permission for publication of image. STATE OF INDIA’S NEWBORNS 2014 Supported by: Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives Programme State of India’s Newborns 2014 Disclaimer The contents of this publication represent personal views of respective authors and not necessarily those of the institutions/organizations to which they are affiliated. © Copyright 2014 Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi and All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise for commercial purposes, without the prior written permission of PHFI. Suggested Citation: PHFI, AIIMS, and SC- State of India’s Newborns (SOIN) 2014- a report. (Eds) Zodpey S and Paul VK. Public Health Foundation of India, All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Save the Children. New Delhi, India AdvisORS Prof. K. Srinath Reddy Dr. Rakesh Kumar Dr. Steve Wall President Joint Secretary Senior Director Public Health Foundation of India Ministry of Health and Savings Newborn Lives Family Welfare, Government of India Save the Children (US) CORE WRITING TEAM Public Health Foundation of All India Institute of Medical India (PHFI) Sciences (AIIMS) Prof. Sanjay Zodpey Prof. Vinod K. Paul Director Head, Department of Pediatrics Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi Dr. Sutapa B. Neogi Dr. M. Jeeva Sankar Additional Professor Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi Dr. Jyoti Sharma Associate Professor Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi Mr. Maulik Chokshi Associate Professor Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi Ms. Monika Chauhan Research Associate Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi State of India’s Newborns 2014 INVITED AUTHORS Dr. David Osrin Dr. Anu Thukral Reader in Global Health Senior Research Associate, Department of Pediatrics University College London, London All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (Newborn Health in Urban India) (Educational Innovations for Improving Newborn Care) Prof. Ashok K. Deorari Prof. Uma S. Nayak Department of Pediatrics Department of Pediatrics All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Baroda (Educational Innovations for Improving Newborn Care) (Educational Innovations for Improving Newborn Care) Dr. Akash Ganju Mr. V. Sashi Kumar Managing Director Managing Director A-Square Healthcare Ventures, Mumbai Phoenix Medical Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai (Harnessing New Technologies for Newborn Care) (Innovating Affordable Indigenous Equipment for Use at Scale) State of India’s Newborns 2014 REVIEW TEAM Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) Dr. Ajay Khera Dr. P. K. Prabhakar Deputy Commissioner Deputy Commissioner Child Health & Immunization Child Health Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Dr. Manisha Malhotra Deputy Commissioner Deputy Commissioner Maternal Health Maternal Health Mr. Vipin Garg Dr. Renu Srivastava National Consultant National SNCU Coordinator Janani Suraksha Yojana Child Health Division INVITED REVIEWERS Prof. Dileep Mavalankar Prof. Siddarth Ramji Director Department of Neonatology Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi SavE THE CHILDREN Dr. David Oot Dr. Sudeep S. Gadok Associate Vice President, Health and Nutrition Director, Programmes Dr. Joy Riggs-Perla Dr. Rajiv Tandon Senior Director, Saving Newborn Lives Programme Formerly at Save the Children Ms. Elaine Scudder Dr. Rajesh Khanna Programme Manager, Newborn Health Technical Advisor, Saving Newborn Lives Ms. Lara Vaz Dr. Anuradha Jain Senior Advisor, Monitoring and Evaluation Advisor, RMNCH+A Coalition Dr. Uzma Syed Dr. Benazir Patil Advisor, Newborn Health, Asia Region Advisor, Urban Health Dr. Isha Prasad Bhagwat National Manager, Health/Nutrition Mr. Prasann Thatte National Manager, Research Dr. Naomi Patrao Programme Manager, Saving Newborn Lives State of India’s Newborns 2014 ACKnowledgementS We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the following colleagues who participated in the stakeholders’ meeting for this Report held in July 2013 and provided valuable suggestions and inputs: Dr. Abhay Bang Dr. Malabika Roy SEARCH, Gadchiroli Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi Dr. Anand Bang Ms. Nirupama Sarma NHSRC, New Delhi Save the Children India, New Delhi Dr. Anju Puri Ms. Projna Sadhukhan USAID-MCHIP, New Delhi Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi Dr. Anil Verma Dr. Rajani Ved NRHM, Lucknow NHSRC, New Delhi Dr. Bhaskar Mishra Dr. Rajesh Sinha UNICEF, New Delhi Ekjut, West Singhbhum Mr. Colin Almeleh Dr. Reeta Rasaily Child Investment Fund Foundation, London Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi Dr. Deepti Agarwal Dr. Sachin Gupta Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi USAID, Washington DC Dr. Devendra Khandait Prof. Shally Awasthi Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi King George Medical University, Lucknow Dr. Gagan Gupta Prof. Sushma Nangia UNICEF, New Delhi Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi Dr. Hariom Dixit Ms. Suzanne Fournier NRHM, Lucknow Child Investment Fund Foundation, London Dr. Harish Chellani Prof. Vikas Desai Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi Urban Health and Climate Resilience Centre, Surat Ms. Lily Kak Dr. Vikram Datta USAID, Washington DC National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi State of India’s Newborns 2014 Dr. Harsh Vardhan State of India’s Newborns 2014 Shri Lov Verma Secretary, Health and Family Welfare State of India’s Newborns 2014 Dr. Joy Riggs-Perla Director, Saving Newborn Lives Save the Children US Foreword Save the Children, through its Saving Newborn Lives programme, is pleased to have supported this 2014 edition of the State of India’s Newborn (SOIN) report. Reading the first SOIN report, issued in 2004, provides a clear reminder of the global leadership India has provided over the years in newborn health, as well as how much progress has been made since 2004 for India’s youngest citizens. India continues to be a global pioneer in demonstrating, even in low resource settings, how effective and high impact programmes can be developed and implemented to improve the outcomes for mothers and their newborns. This second edition of the SOIN report reviews the evidence generated progress and learning in newborn health in India over the past ten years, and actions needed to accelerate progress in newborn health and survival in the decade ahead. This SOIN report comes at a time when the potential for accelerating progress is both optimal and unprecedented. The Government of India is making massive investments through the National Rural and National Urban Health Missions to reach the poorest and most vulnerable segments of society with improved reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health services (RMNCH+A). It is precisely those 184 districts that contribute to the highest numbers of deaths among babies under one month of age. A number of new policies are now in place in India that support the introduction, implementation, and effective scale up of the high impact, evidence-based newborn health interventions. Importantly, India has the programme platforms and resource allocations needed to facilitate the rapid and effective expansion of coverage of these life-saving maternal and newborn interventions. The newly launched India Newborn Action Plan (INAP) is tangible evidence of the government’s commitment to focus increased attention on newborn health and survival, and we commend the government for setting ambitious targets for reducing newborn mortality within the context of a continuum of care as reflected in the overall RMNCH+A programme. The 2014 SOIN report provides an up to date assessment of the status of the newborn, what has been done and learned, and suggests actions needed to further accelerate progress in support of the INAP. We are grateful for the guidance and encouragement provided by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in the preparation of this report. We also want to express our gratitude to the talented and dedicated team from the Public Health Foundation of India and the All India Institute for Medical Sciences in New Delhi who worked tirelessly to prepare this report. Finally, we wish to thank the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for supporting the preparation of this report, and for their support for newborn health work in India since 2001 through Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives programme. Save the Children is honored to be a part of this historic effort on behalf of mothers and newborns in India. Joy Riggs-Perla State of India’s Newborns 2014 Mr. Thomas Chandy CEO Save the Children India Message India has made considerable progress over the last two decades in the area of maternal and child health, through innovative and comprehensive health packages that covers the spectrum of Reproductive Child Health (RCH). Newborns however have missed out on the attention. The neonatal mortality rate (NMR) has declined at a slower pace compared to that of under-five mortality rate (U5MR). Of the 6.6 million under-five child deaths that occur globally every year, about 44 percent occur in the neonatal period; the proportion is much higher – around 56 percent – in India. The Millennium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women's Tennis Record Book Women's Tennis Record Book.Qxd
    SEC Women s Tennis Record Book SEC CHAMPIONS Year Champion Points Tournament Site 1980 Florida 32 Nashville, Tenn. 1981 Florida 30 Athens, Ga. 1982 Florida Oxford, Miss. 1983 Georgia Tuscaloosa, Ala. 1984 Florida 31 Gainesville, Fla. 1985 Florida 26 Auburn, Ala. 1986 Florida 25 Athens, Ga. 1987 Florida 29 Athens, Ga. 1988 Florida 32 Baton Rouge, La. 1989 Georgia 29 Oxford, Miss. 1990 Florida 11 Starkville, Miss. Georgia 11 1991 Florida 12 Knoxville, Tenn. 1992 Florida 14.5 Tuscaloosa, Ala. 1993 Florida 14 Nashville, Tenn. 1994 Georgia 14 Fayetteville, Ark. 1995 Florida 14 Auburn, Ala. 1996 Florida 14 Gainesville, Fla. 1997 Florida 14 Athens, Ga. 1998 Florida 14 Lexington, Ky. 1999 Florida 14 Baton Rouge, La. Year Regular Season Champion Record Tournament Champion (Site) 2000 Georgia 11-0 Florida (Oxford, Miss.) 2001 Florida 11-0 Georgia (Starkville, Miss.) 2002 Georgia 11-0 Florida (Columbia, S.C.) 2003 Florida 10-1 Florida (Knoxville, Tenn.) 2004 Florida 11-0 Florida (Nashville, Tenn.) 2005 Kentucky 10-1 Florida (Tuscaloosa, Ala.) 2006 Florida 11-0 Florida (Gainesville, Fla) 2007 Florida 10-1 Georgia (Lexington, Ky.) Georgia 10-1 2008 Florida 11-0 Georgia (Auburn, Ala.) 2009 Georgia 10-1 Georgia (Fayetteville, Ark.) 2010 Florida 11-0 Florida (Athens, Ga.) 2011 Florida 11-0 Florida (Knoxville, Tenn.) 2012 Florida 11-0 Florida (Oxford, Miss.) 2013 Florida 12-1 Florida (Starkville, Miss.) Georgia Texas A&M 2014 Alabama 12-1 Georgia (Columbia, Mo.) Note: From 1980-81 and 1984-1989, the SEC Champion was determined by the accumulation of points in an individual flighte 1983, the SEC experimented with the team dual match format in women s tennis for the conference tournament.
    [Show full text]
  • Region 10 Student Branches
    Student Branches in R10 with Counselor & Chair contact August 2015 Par SPO SPO Name SPO ID Officers Full Name Officers Email Address Name Position Start Date Desc Australian Australian Natl Univ STB08001 Chair Miranda Zhang 01/01/2015 [email protected] Capital Terr Counselor LIAM E WALDRON 02/19/2013 [email protected] Section Univ Of New South Wales STB09141 Chair Meng Xu 01/01/2015 [email protected] SB Counselor Craig R Benson 08/19/2011 [email protected] Bangalore Acharya Institute of STB12671 Chair Lachhmi Prasad Sah 02/19/2013 [email protected] Section Technology SB Counselor MAHESHAPPA HARAVE 02/19/2013 [email protected] DEVANNA Adichunchanagiri Institute STB98331 Counselor Anil Kumar 05/06/2011 [email protected] of Technology SB Amrita School of STB63931 Chair Siddharth Gupta 05/03/2005 [email protected] Engineering Bangalore Counselor chaitanya kumar 05/03/2005 [email protected] SB Amrutha Institute of Eng STB08291 Chair Darshan Virupaksha 06/13/2011 [email protected] and Mgmt Sciences SB Counselor Rajagopal Ramdas Coorg 06/13/2011 [email protected] B V B College of Eng & STB62711 Chair SUHAIL N 01/01/2013 [email protected] Tech, Vidyanagar Counselor Rajeshwari M Banakar 03/09/2011 [email protected] B. M. Sreenivasalah STB04431 Chair Yashunandan Sureka 04/11/2015 [email protected] College of Engineering Counselor Meena Parathodiyil Menon 03/01/2014 [email protected] SB BMS Institute of STB14611 Chair Aranya Khinvasara 11/11/2013 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Indian-Luxury-Top-50-Women Final
    O Most Powerful Women of 2020 Prologue espite the global instability and slump “People are in the Indian economy, the Indian luxury industry is fighting hard to survive looking for and make profits. Over the past few authentic months, Indian luxury leaders have D observed that a consumer’s idea of luxury has experiences evolved. He/she is opting for holistic experiences – whether it’s and just a brand name is not lure-worthy any longer. Take, for example, the F&B industry—people vacations, travel want to know if the ingredients are indigenous, or products” if the food items are organic or gluten-free and what are the safety measures implemented by the restaurant. The meaning of luxury has changed and the They want to indulge, but are looking for guilt-free new-age customers are looking for something that indulgence. Companies are coming up with newer is truly unique and personalised, be it a traditional and unique services and products to offer. Take, for Pichwai painting or a piece of handcrafted jewellery or example, Deepika Gehani, who collaborated with an organic Ayurvedic skincare product. Satya Paul to give the good old sari a new avatar or To celebrate the growth of this niche industry, Khushi Singh, who has redefined luxury weddings. we at LuxeBook, have curated a list of 50 feisty and R ajshree Pathy has noted that people are looking confident women thought leaders, who have stood for authentic experiences – whether it’s vacations, out in the ever-changing luxe market. travel or products. Millennials, the new luxury Let’s raise a toast to these fabulous ladies! consumers, are looking for elegance in products and services; which comes from the highest level of craftsmanship and extensively researched materials, says designer Ritu Kumar.
    [Show full text]
  • Malhotra Constructions Private Limited February 28, 2019 Ratings Amount Facilities Rating1 Rating Action (Rs
    Rationale-Press Release Malhotra Constructions Private Limited February 28, 2019 Ratings Amount Facilities Rating1 Rating Action (Rs. crore) CARE B+; Stable Long-term Bank Facilities 3.00 Reaffirmed (Single B Plus; Outlook: Stable) CARE A4 Short-term Bank Facilities 11.00 Reaffirmed (A Four) 14.00 Total Facilities (Rupees Fourteen crore only) Details of instruments/facilities in Annexure-1 Detailed Rationale & Key Rating Drivers The ratings assigned to the bank facilities of Malhotra Constructions Private Limited (MCP) continued to be constrained by its small scale of operations, leveraged capital structure and working capital intensive nature of operations. The ratings are further constrained by fragmented nature of the construction sector. The ratings, however, derive strength from experienced promoters in the construction industry, moderate order book position, moderate profitability margins and positive outlook for construction industry. Going forward, the ability of the company to successfully execute projects in time and recover contract proceeds and scale up its operations while maintaining its profitability margins would remain the key rating sensitivities. Detailed description of the key rating drivers Key Rating Weaknesses Small scale of operations The total operating income of the company decreased from Rs. 14.13 crore in FY17 to 10.58 crore in FY18 (refers to period from April 1 to March 31) due decline in orders received from customers and the same stood small. The small scale limits the company’s financial flexibility in times of stress and deprives it of scale benefits. Furthermore, the company has reported total operating income of Rs. 6.00 crore in 10FY19 (Provisional). Leveraged capital structure and weak total debt to GCA ratio The capital structure of the company stood moderately leveraged marked by overall gearing ratio of 1.41x as on March 31, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Alina Jidkova (RUS) Ladies' Doubles
    Alina Jidkova (RUS) Ladies' Doubles Code->Event From To Participations Matches Won/Lost Walkovers W/L Total 1999 2008 8 16 7 / 9 0 / 0 LD->Ladies' Doubles 1999 2005 6 8 2 / 6 0 / 0 RD->Qualif. Ladies' Doubles 1999 2008 4 8 5 / 3 0 / 0 Year Opponent's Name Seed Rnd Result Score 1999 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Larissa Schaerer (PAR) RD Barbara Schwartz (AUT) and Patricia Wartusch (AUT) 4 1 W 3/6 6/4 6/3 RD Kim Clijsters (BEL) and Antonella Serra-Zanetti (ITA) Q W 6/2 6/1 RD Julia Abe (GER) and Nadejda Petrova (RUS) S L 2/6 3/6 LD Mary Joe Fernandez (USA) and Monica Seles (USA) 1 L 1/6 2/6 2000 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Elena Bovina (RUS) RD Helen Crook (GBR) and Victoria Davies (GBR) 1 L 4/6 7/5 1/6 2001 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Meilen Tu (USA) LD Caroline Dhenin (FRA) and Mariana Diaz-Oliva (ARG) 1 L 3/6 6/7(3) 2002 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Bryanne Stewart (AUS) seeded 6 RD Leanne Baker (NZL) and Manisha Malhotra (IND) 1 W 6/2 6/4 RD Lenka Nemeckova (CZE) and Andreea Vanc (ROM) 1 Q W 6/1 6/4 LD Julie Pullin (GBR) and Lorna Woodroffe (GBR) 1 W 7/6(4) 2/6 6/1 LD Nannie De Villiers (RSA) and Irina Selyutina (KAZ) 2 L 7/5 6/7(0) 3/6 2003 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Akiko Morigami (JPN) LD Daniela Hantuchova (SVK) and Chanda Rubin (USA) 9 1 L 2/6 5/7 2004 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Maria Elena Camerin (ITA) LD Marion Bartoli (FRA) and Emilie Loit (FRA) 11 1 L 4/6 1/6 2005 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Tatiana Perebiynis (UKR) LD Anna Chakvetadze (RUS) and Sania Mirza (IND) 1 W 6/2 6/1 LD Emilie Loit (FRA) and Barbora Strycova (CZE) 15 2 L 6/3 4/6 5/7 2008 Alina Jidkova (RUS) partnered with Lilia Osterloh (USA) seeded 3 RD Jade Curtis (GBR) and Elizabeth Thomas (GBR) 1 W 7/5 6/0 RD Jorgelina Cravero (ARG) and Betina Jozami (ARG) 7 Q L 6/2 5/7 1/6 This material is the copyright of the All England Lawn Tennis Club and may not be reproduced in any form without written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Answered On:27.11.2002 Asian Games Chandresh Patel Kordia
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO:1551 ANSWERED ON:27.11.2002 ASIAN GAMES CHANDRESH PATEL KORDIA Will the Minister of YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS be pleased to state: (a) the names of the sports persons who participated in Asian Games at Busan alongwith the names of the sports in which they participated; (b) the manner in which each of the players was selected for the above said game; and ( (c) the number of gold medals, silver medals and bronze medals bagged by each of the participants separately? Answer THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS (SHRI PON. RADHAKIRISHNAN) (a) Details of such sports persons are given at Annexure-I. (b) The players are selected by a Selection Committee constituted by the concerned National Sports Federation. (c) Details are given at Anneuxre-II. ANNEXURE-I ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART (a) OF THE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO.1551 FOR ANSWER ON 27.11.2002 REGARDING ASIAN GAMES LIST OF SPORTS PERSONS CLEARED AT GOVT. COST BY GOVERNMENT FOR PARTICIAPTION XINIV ASIAN GAMES HELD AT BUSAN, SOUTH KOREA FROM 29STEHP TEMBER TO 14TH OCTOBER, 2002 ARCHERY Men S/Shri 1 1 Player Satya Dev Prasad 2 2 Player Limba Ram 3 3 Player Kailash 4 4 Player Ved Kumar Women 5 1 Player Dola Banerjee 6 2 Player Chekrovolu Swuro Athletics Men 7 1 Players - 200m & 4 x Anand Menezes 100m Relay 8 2 Player - 4 x 400m Manoj Lal Relay 9 3 Player - 4 x 400m Jata Shankar Relay 10 4 Player - 4 x 400m Satbir Singh Relay 11 5 Player - 400m & 4 x Paramjit Singh 400m Relay
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Tennis Record Book Women's Tennis Record
    SEC Women’s Tennis Record Book SEC CHAMPIONS Year Champion Points Tournament Site 1980 Florida 32 Nashville, Tenn. 1981 Florida 30 Athens, Ga. 1982 Florida Oxford, Miss. 1983 Georgia Tuscaloosa, Ala. 1984 Florida 31 Gainesville, Fla. 1985 Florida 26 Auburn, Ala. 1986 Florida 25 Athens, Ga. 1987 Florida 29 Athens, Ga. 1988 Florida 32 Baton Rouge, La. 1989 Georgia 29 Oxford, Miss. 1990 Florida 11 Starkville, Miss. Georgia 11 1991 Florida 12 Knoxville, Tenn. 1992 Florida 14.5 Tuscaloosa, Ala. 1993 Florida 14 Nashville, Tenn. 1994 Georgia 14 Fayetteville, Ark. 1995 Florida 14 Auburn, Ala. 1996 Florida 14 Gainesville, Fla. 1997 Florida 14 Athens, Ga. 1998 Florida 14 Lexington, Ky. 1999 Florida 14 Baton Rouge, La. Year Regular Season Champion Record Tournament Champion (Site) 2000 Georgia 11-0 Florida (Oxford, Miss.) 2001 Florida 11-0 Georgia (Starkville, Miss.) 2002 Georgia 11-0 Florida (Columbia, S.C.) 2003 Florida 10-1 Florida (Knoxville, Tenn.) 2004 Florida 11-0 Florida (Nashville, Tenn.) 2005 Kentucky 10-1 Florida (Tuscaloosa, Ala.) 2006 Florida 11-0 Florida (Gainesville, Fla) 2007 Florida 10-1 Georgia (Lexington, Ky.) Georgia 10-1 2008 Florida 11-0 Georgia (Auburn, Ala.) 2009 Georgia 10-1 Georgia (Fayetteville, Ark.) 2010 Florida 11-0 Florida (Athens, Ga.) 2011 Florida 11-0 Florida (Knoxville, Tenn.) 2012 Florida 11-0 Florida (Oxford, Miss.) Note: From 1980-81 and 1984-1989, the SEC Champion was determined by the accumulation of points in an individual flighted tournament. In 1982 and 1983, the SEC experimented with the team dual match format in women’s tennis for the conference tournament.
    [Show full text]
  • Binani Industries Limited
    Binani Industries Limited Statement of Unclaimed dividend amount consecutively for 7 years, whose shares are to be transferred to IEPF Suspense Account SrNo Foliono Name Address1 Address2 Address3 Address4 Pincode 1 IN30125010274345 BINA SINGHANIA 227 C.R.AVENUE CALCUTTA 700006 2 00000038 DAWAR SURAJ KRISHAN C/O DAWAR BROTHERSHAMIDIA ROAD BHOPAL (M P) 0 0 3 00000101 MADHUKANTABEN R PATEL C/O R PATEL FIJIWALA DAVEPOLE NADIAD KAIRA 0 0 4 00000108 MOHAN SINGH BHATIA 287/VIII-1 KATRA KARAM SINGH AMRITSAR 0 0 5 00000124 P R PARAMESWARAN NAIR ADVOCATE P O THODUPUZHA KERALA 0 0 6 00000126 P S BALAKRISHNAN PANAKAL HOUSE PO ENGANDIYUR DT TRICHUR 0 0 7 00000156 RAMASWAMY RAJU C/O MANIPAL INDUSTRIES"MUKUND LTD NIVAS" UDIPI 0 0 8 00000164 RAGHUNATH UPADHYAYA CANE MANAGER SARAYA SUGAR MILLS (P) LTD PO SARIANAGAR DT GORAKHPUR0 (U P) 0 9 00000260 MADHULATA CHANDRA 74 SAKSERIA BUILDINGMARINE DRIVE MUMBAI 0 0 10 00000265 MOHINDER LAKHBIR SINGH C-145 DEFENCE COLONYNEW DELHI 0 0 11 00000331 K SUDHA SANKAR 64 DANAPPA MUDALI STREETMADURAI MADRAS STATE 0 0 12 00000403 RAM SHARN BHATEJA ADVOCATE H NO 212 SECTOR NO 18A CHANDIGARH 00 13 00000411 MANGILAL KAYAL C/O GHASIRAM MANGILALSAMBHAR LAKE 0 0 14 00000423 LESLIE DONALD FARLAM C/O THE BRAITHWAITE CONSTRUCTIONBURN & JESSOP CO LTD P O DHURWA RANCHI 0 0 15 00000438 KAMLA MISRA "UNITY LODGE" T G CIVIL LINES LUCKNOW U P 0 0 16 00000441 BAIDYA NATH DAS 26 ABNKU BEHARI GHOSEP O LANE BELURMATH HOWRAH 0 0 17 00000487 NAVINBHAI RAOJIBHAI PATEL DAVE POLE KAKERKHAD FIJIWALA NADIAD GUJARAT0 0 18 00000501 MINHAJUDDIN AHMED
    [Show full text]
  • Srno Party Credit Grantor State Credit Grantor
    SRN OUTSTANDING PARTY CREDIT GRANTOR STATE CREDIT GRANTOR BRANCH REGISTERED ADDRESS ASSET CLASSIFICATION DATE OF CLASSIFICATION SUIT OTHER BANK DIRECTOR 1 PAN_DIR1 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 1 DIRECTOR 2 PAN_DIR2 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 2 DIRECTOR 3 PAN_DIR3 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 3 DIRECTOR 4 PAN_DIR4 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 4 DIRECTOR 5 PAN_DIR5 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 5 DIRECTOR 6 PAN_DIR6 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 6 DIRECTOR 7 PAN_DIR7 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 7 DIRECTOR 8 PAN_DIR8 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 8 DIRECTOR 9 PAN_DIR9 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 9 DIRECTOR 10 PAN_DIR10 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 10 DIRECTOR 11 PAN_DIR11 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 11 DIRECTOR 12 PAN_DIR12 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 12 DIRECTOR 13 PAN_DIR13 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 13 DIRECTOR 14 PAN_DIR14 DIN FOR DIRECTOR 14 O AMOUNT IN LACS BIL INDUSTRIES LTD. EARLIER KNOWN AS BHUPENDRA INDUSTRIES LTD ABHYUDAYA CO-OP. BANK MAHARASHTRA RECOVERY KHOPOLI PEN ROAD, VILLAGE- TAMBATTI, DIST. RAIGAD, 1708 12.04.1998 BAGLA SANTOSHKUMAR BAGLA SHIVKUMAR JANJID SHYAMKUMAR S. BAGLA LAXMINARAYAN K. S. PARK BHARAT BAGLA 1 LTD. STATE- MAHARASHTRA GLOBAL TRADING CORPORATION ABHYUDAYA CO-OP. BANK MAHARASHTRA RECOVERY 11/6, SHERE PUNJAB SOCIETY, MAHAKALI CAVES ROAD, 391 16.09.1996 SAWANT AMIT 2 LTD. ANDHERI (E), MUMBAI- 400 093 J. SQUARE STEELS PVT. LTD ABHYUDAYA CO-OP. BANK MAHARASHTRA RECOVERY 401,GODAVARI BUILDING, SIR POCHKHANWALA ROAD, 6591 15.12.2008 MR. RAJENDRA N. EKAMBE 675305 MR. VISHRAM N. EKAMBE - MR. BALU SURYAVANSHI 2320499 3 LTD. WORLI, MUMBAI 400 030 LEON CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD ABHYUDAYA CO-OP. BANK MAHARASHTRA RECOVERY 343/A, BADAM WADI, 3RD FLOOR, ROOM NO.29, 201 16.09.1996 DR. A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Australian Open
    2019 FED CUP BY BNP PARIBAS WORLD GROUP FIRST ROUND WORLD GROUP II FIRST ROUND 9-10 February – TIE NOTES WORLD GROUP FIRST ROUND Czech Republic (s) (c) v Romania – Ostravar Arena, Ostrava, CZE – (hard, indoors) Belgium (c) v France (s) – Country Hall du Sart-Tilman, Liège, BEL – (hard, indoors) Germany (c) v Belarus (s) – Volkswagen Halle, Braunschweig, GER – (hard, indoors) USA (s) (c) v Australia – US Cellular Arena, Asheville, NC, USA – (hard, indoors) WORLD GROUP II FIRST ROUND Switzerland (s) (c)* v Italy – Swiss Tennis Arena, Biel, SUI – (hard, indoors) Latvia (c)* v Slovakia (s) – Arena Riga, Riga, LAT – (hard, indoors) Japan (s) (c) v Spain – Sogo Gymnastic Hall, Kita-kyushu, JPN – (hard, indoors) Netherlands (s) (c)* v Canada – Maaspoort Sports & Events, ’s-Hertogenbosch, NED – (clay, indoors) (s) = seed (c) = choice of ground * = choice of ground was decided by lot CHOICE OF GROUND – WORLD GROUP SEMIFINALS The winners of this weekend’s World Group first round ties advance to the semifinals on 20-21 April. Below is the choice of ground for all potential semifinal match-ups. The venue details are due to be submitted to the ITF by 25 February. BELGIUM FRANCE CZECH REPUBLIC CZE CZE ROMANIA BEL FRA* USA AUSTRALIA GERMANY GER AUS BELARUS USA AUS* * choice of ground decided by lot WORLD GROUP & WORLD GROUP II PLAY-OFFS The World Group play-offs and World Group II play-offs will also take place on 20-21 April. The draw for the World Group play-offs and World Group II play-offs will be held at the ITF offices in London on Tuesday 12 February.
    [Show full text]
  • Class IX to XII Students
    BENNETT, COLEMAN & CO. LTD. | ESTABLISHED 1838 | TIMESOFINDIA.COM | NEW DELHI ➤For parents: Check out ➤How do you plan to spend ➤ Meet the STUDENT EDITION our tips on how to turn your weekend, amid lockdown English TODAY’S your kids into avid readers Champions, Man THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2021 Newspaper in ➤Check out your favourite Education City EDITION reviews PAGE 2 PAGE 3 PAGE 4 WEB EDITION MAN CITY CROWNED CLICK HERE: PAGE 1 AND 2 ENGLISH CHAMPIONS TIMES NIE CBSE's 'dost for life' app to counsel Answers Your Query Arv Srivastava, class IX to XII students class X, Jayshree anchester City won their The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has launched a mobile app to solve fifth Premier League title in Periwal Global school, M nine years after crosstown Jaipur the mental health problems of students from classes IX to XII during the ongoing Covid rivals Manchester United slumped to a pandemic. With the help of the app, students and parents will be able to get answers to 2-1 loss to Leicester City on Tuesday How can kids night, marking an extraordinary rise to Qprotect them- their questions on education, health and social topics... power since the takeover of the club by selves from a sup- the Abu Dhabi royal family. posed 3rd wave? Named 'dost for life', the app To ask queries Kids should stay at home, 'DOST Pep Guardiola's men will regarding Covid-19 eat home-cooked food, can be used to improve students' psycho-social wellness now aim to top it off with their and Vaccination from wash hands well and wear maiden European trophy, when masks even at home, if FOR our experts, scan the Free live counselling sessions will they face fellow English side possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Australian Open
    2017 FED CUP BY BNP PARIBAS WORLD GROUP FIRST ROUND WORLD GROUP II FIRST ROUND 11-12 February – TIE NOTES WORLD GROUP FIRST ROUND Czech Republic (s) (c) v Spain Ostravar Arena, Ostrava, CZE (hard – indoors) USA (c) v Germany (s) Royal Lahaina Resort, Maui, Hawaii, USA (hard – outdoors) Belarus (c)* v Netherlands (s) Chizhovka-Arena, Minsk, BLR (hard – indoors) Switzerland (c) v France (s) Palexpo, Geneva, SUI (hard – indoors) WORLD GROUP II FIRST ROUND Russia (s) (c)* v Chinese Taipei Druzhba Sport Complex, Moscow, RUS (hard – indoors) Romania (s) (c)* v Belgium Sala Polivalenta, Bucharest, ROU (hard – indoors) Ukraine (c) v Australia (s) Palace of Sports ‘Lokomotiv’, Kharkiv, UKR (hard – indoors) Italy (s) (c)* v Slovakia PalaGalassi, Forli, ITA (clay – indoors) (s) = seed (c) = choice of ground * = choice of ground was decided by lot CHOICE OF GROUND – WORLD GROUP SEMIFINALS The winners of this weekend’s World Group first round ties advance to the semifinals on 22-17 April. Below is the choice of ground for all potential semifinal match-ups. The venue details are due to be submitted to the ITF by 27 February. USA GERMANY CZECH REPUBLIC USA GER SPAIN USA** GER SWITZERLAND FRANCE BELARUS BLR FRA* NETHERLANDS SUI* NED * choice of ground decided by lot ** extenuating cirmcumstances (the meetings between Spain and USA in 2000-04, when the competition was played as a ‘Final Four’, are disregarded for the purposes of choice of ground) 2017 Fed Cup by BNP Paribas World Group/World Group II First Round Tie Notes 1 PAST CHAMPIONS In total, 11 nations have won the Fed Cup.
    [Show full text]