On Frogs, Toxins and True Friendship: an Atypical Case Report Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-Ribeiro1* and Christian Roussilhon2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca
Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca John F. Lamoreux, Meghan W. McKnight, and Rodolfo Cabrera Hernandez Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 53 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Lamoreux, J. F., McKnight, M. W., and R. Cabrera Hernandez (2015). Amphibian Alliance for Zero Extinction Sites in Chiapas and Oaxaca. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xxiv + 320pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1717-3 DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2015.SSC-OP.53.en Cover photographs: Totontepec landscape; new Plectrohyla species, Ixalotriton niger, Concepción Pápalo, Thorius minutissimus, Craugastor pozo (panels, left to right) Back cover photograph: Collecting in Chamula, Chiapas Photo credits: The cover photographs were taken by the authors under grant agreements with the two main project funders: NGS and CEPF. -
Reactivating the Lake Junín Giant Frog Monitoring Program
December 2020 AMPHIBIAN SURVIVAL ALLIANCE NEWTSLETTER Got a story you want to share? Drop Candace an email today! [email protected] Stories from our partners around the world © Rogger Angel Moreno Lino Moreno Angel © Rogger Reactivating the Lake Junín Giant Frog monitoring program By Rogger Angel Moreno Lino, Luis and economy; businesses and NGOs In this way, ASA partner Grupo Castillo Roque and Roberto Elias have stopped their activities and RANA participated in a project for Piperis. Grupo RANA (Peru) and reduced their budgets among other the monitoring and surveillance of Denver Zoological Foundation (U.S.) things (Smith-Bingham & Harlharan, populations of the Lake Junín Giant [email protected] 2020; Crothers, 2020). However, Frog (Telmatobius macrostomus) solidarity among people and institu- and the Junín ‘Wanchas’ (Telma- The world is going through difficult tions has allowed activities to be tobius brachydactylus) in three times due to the COVID-19 pan- progressively reactivated, though protected natural areas (Junín Na- demic (WWF, 2020). Many people following rigorous biosecurity meas- tional Reserve, Historic Sanctuary of have been affected in their health ures. Chacamarca and Huayllay National Page 1 Sanctuary). These activities were by Pablo Miñano Lecaros. The park (CCPH), the presence of six adult led by the Denver Zoological Foun- rangers Winy Arias López, Eduardo frogs was recorded around 500 dation and funded by the National Ruiz and Duane Martínez supported meters from our monitoring point Geographic Society and followed the the activities. at the south of the Junín National biosecurity measures recommended As part of the preliminary results, Reserve. by the Ministry of Health of Peru we report three adults of the Junín It should be noted that the CCPH (D.S. -
Lauren A. O'connell
Lauren A. O’Connell Stanford University • 371 Serra Mall • Stanford, CA 94304 • phone 650-721-2768 [email protected] • oconnell.stanford.edu • ORCID: 0000-0002-2706-4077 __________________________________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Stanford University, Assistant Professor, DepartMent of Biology 2017 - present Harvard University, Bauer Fellow, FAS Center for SysteMs Biology 2012 - 2017 University of Texas at Austin, Ph.D. Cellular and Molecular Biology 2006 - 2011 Cornell University, B.S. Biological Sciences 2004 - 2006 Tarrant County College, A.A. 2002 - 2004 FUNDING National Science Foundation - Integrative Organismal SysteMs, $1,200,000 2019 - 2024 “CAREER: FroM ecology to neurobiology: spatial cognition in rainforest frogs” National Science Foundation - Integrative Organismal SysteMs, $1,600,000 2018 - 2021 “EDGE: Enabling functional genoMiCs tools in aMphibians” National Science Foundation - Integrative Organismal SysteMs, $800,000 2016 - 2020 “BioaccuMulation Mechanisms of defensive cheMicals in a poison frog” HellMan Faculty Scholar Award, $40,000 2018 - 2019 “Dietary tuning of infant social coMMunication” National Geographic Society CoMMittee for Research and Exploration, $18,600 2015 - 2016 “Convergent Evolution of Maternal Care in Poison Frogs” HONORS AND FELLOWSHIPS Kavli Fellow of the National AcadeMy of Sciences 2019 HellMan Faculty Fellow 2018 Frank A. Beach New Investigator Award 2018 L’Oreal USA Changing the Face of STEM Mentorship Grant 2016, 2018 L’Oreal USA For WoMen in Science Fellowship 2015 Adele Lewis Grant Fellowship froM Graduate WoMen in Science 2015 International Society for Neuroethology Konishi Neuroethology Research Award 2014 International Society for Neuroethology Capranica Prize 2013 International Society for Neuroethology Young Investigator Award 2012 Society for Social Neuroscience Early Career Award 2011 Society for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology Young Investigator Award 2011 UT-Austin WilliaM S. -
Taxonomic Checklist of Amphibian Species Listed in the CITES
CoP17 Doc. 81.1 Annex 5 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of Amphibian Species listed in the CITES Appendices and the Annexes of EC Regulation 338/97 Species information extracted from FROST, D. R. (2015) "Amphibian Species of the World, an online Reference" V. 6.0 (as of May 2015) Copyright © 1998-2015, Darrel Frost and TheAmericanMuseum of Natural History. All Rights Reserved. Additional comments included by the Nomenclature Specialist of the CITES Animals Committee (indicated by "NC comment") Reproduction for commercial purposes prohibited. CoP17 Doc. 81.1 Annex 5 - p. 1 Amphibian Species covered by this Checklist listed by listed by CITES EC- as well as Family Species Regulation EC 338/97 Regulation only 338/97 ANURA Aromobatidae Allobates femoralis X Aromobatidae Allobates hodli X Aromobatidae Allobates myersi X Aromobatidae Allobates zaparo X Aromobatidae Anomaloglossus rufulus X Bufonidae Altiphrynoides malcolmi X Bufonidae Altiphrynoides osgoodi X Bufonidae Amietophrynus channingi X Bufonidae Amietophrynus superciliaris X Bufonidae Atelopus zeteki X Bufonidae Incilius periglenes X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides asperginis X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides cryptus X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides frontierei X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides laevis X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides laticeps X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides minutus X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides paulae X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides poyntoni X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides pseudotornieri X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides tornieri X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides vestergaardi -
Summary Record of the 26Th Meeting of the Animals Committee
Original language: English AC26 summary record CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Twenty-sixth meeting of the Animals Committee Geneva (Switzerland), 15-20 March 2012 and Dublin (Ireland), 22-24 March 2012 SUMMARY RECORD Animals Committee matters 1. Opening of the meeting The Chair opened the meeting and welcomed all participants, before giving the floor to the Secretary- General, who also welcomed everyone and introduced new members of the Secretariat's scientific team (Mr De Meulenaer and Ms Kwitsinskaia) and enforcement team (Ms Garcia Ferreira, Ms Jonsson and Mr van Rensburg). He wished the Committee well in its deliberations. The Chair thanked the Secretary-General and invited suggestions as to how the Conference of the Parties could establish stronger measures to support the Committee as well as export countries, which deserved particular assistance. No other intervention was made during discussion of this item.1 2. Rules of Procedure The Secretariat introduced document AC26 Doc. 2 and proposed amending Rule 22 as follows: “On request, the Secretariat shall distribute printed and translated documents...”. The Secretariat explained that most members regularly indicated that they did not need printed copies and that this proposal was made to reduce costs. Although not opposed to the change in principle, a Party regretted that the suggestion had not been presented in the document, which would have given Parties time to consider it, and was concerned that this unannounced proposal might create a precedent. Another Party asked a question on the procedure to accept observers, but the Chair invited it to raise this topic under agenda item 4 on Admission of observers. -
Poison Dart Frogs
POISON DART FROGS Anura Dendrobates tinctorius Family: Dendrobatidae Genus: multiple Range: Southern Central America and north and central South America Habitat: tropical rainforests Niche: Diurnal, terrestrial; breed in trees, carnivorous Wild diet: small invertebrates, particularly ants, which give them their poisonous properties in most cases Zoo diet: pinhead crickets, fruitflies Life Span: (Wild) 3-15 years (Captivity) up to 20 years Sexual dimorphism: Males slightly smaller Location in SF Zoo: South American Tropical Rainforest and Aviary APPEARANCE & PHYSICAL ADAPTATIONS: There are 40 species of Dendrobates poison dart frogs. All have bright coloration (aposematic coloration), which warns predators of their toxic skin secretions (alkaloids obtained from insects they eat). They are small frogs (most are no bigger than a paper clip). They have a good vision used to help capture prey. Their long, sticky tongue darts out and captures their prey once spoted. Each foot contains four toes which each have a flattened tip with a suction cup pad which is used for gripping and clinging to vegetation in its habitat. They lack webbing and are poor swimmers and are found near water but not in it. Weight: < 1 oz (< 28 g) Poison Dart Frogs have no webbing between the toes on their feet, so Length: 1 - 6 cm they are poor swimmers and are not often found in the water. STATUS & CONSERVATION: Many species are threatened by habitat loss and over-collection for the pet trade. COMMUNICATION AND OTHER BEHAVIOR The males are territorial, calling to advertise to females and to defend their area. Calls are species dependent and can be anything from a buzz to trilling whistles. -
Between Species: Choreographing Human And
BETWEEN SPECIES: CHOREOGRAPHING HUMAN AND NONHUMAN BODIES JONATHAN OSBORN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN DANCE STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO MAY, 2019 ã Jonathan Osborn, 2019 Abstract BETWEEN SPECIES: CHOREOGRAPHING HUMAN AND NONHUMAN BODIES is a dissertation project informed by practice-led and practice-based modes of engagement, which approaches the space of the zoo as a multispecies, choreographic, affective assemblage. Drawing from critical scholarship in dance literature, zoo studies, human-animal studies, posthuman philosophy, and experiential/somatic field studies, this work utilizes choreographic engagement, with the topography and inhabitants of the Toronto Zoo and the Berlin Zoologischer Garten, to investigate the potential for kinaesthetic exchanges between human and nonhuman subjects. In tracing these exchanges, BETWEEN SPECIES documents the creation of the zoomorphic choreographic works ARK and ARCHE and creatively mediates on: more-than-human choreography; the curatorial paradigms, embodied practices, and forms of zoological gardens; the staging of human and nonhuman bodies and bodies of knowledge; the resonances and dissonances between ethological research and dance ethnography; and, the anthropocentric constitution of the field of dance studies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the glowing memory of my nana, Patricia Maltby, who, through her relentless love and fervent belief in my potential, elegantly willed me into another phase of life, while she passed, with dignity and calm, into another realm of existence. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my phenomenal supervisor Dr. Barbara Sellers-Young and my amazing committee members Dr. -
Experimental Transmission of Cutaneous Chytridiomycosis in Dendrobatid Frogs
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 37(1), 2001, pp. 1–11 EXPERIMENTAL TRANSMISSION OF CUTANEOUS CHYTRIDIOMYCOSIS IN DENDROBATID FROGS Donald K. Nichols,1,4 Elaine W. Lamirande,1 Allan P. Pessier,1,3 and Joyce E. Longcore2 1 Department of Pathology, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, 3000 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20008, USA 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA 3 Current address: Department of Pathology, Zoological Society of San Diego, P.O. Box 120551, San Diego, California 92112, USA 4 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: In a series of three experiments during March–October, 1998, two species of captive- bred poison dart frogs (Dendrobates tinctorius and D. auratus) were exposed to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a recently-described chytridiomycete fungus (chytrid) that was originally isolated from a blue poison dart frog (D. azureus). All frogs exposed to the chytrids developed a fatal skin disease, whereas none of the control frogs developed skin lesions. The most consistent clinical sign in chytrid-exposed frogs was excessive shedding of skin. Gross lesions were subtle, usually affected the legs and ventrum, and consisted of mild skin thickening and discoloration. Micro- scopic examination of shed skin pieces and/or skin imprints demonstrated the presence of chytrids and was used for ante mortem and post mortem confirmation of chytrid infection. Histologically, there was epidermal hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia, and hypertrophy associated with low to moderate numbers of chytrids in the keratinized layers. These experiments demonstrated that Batracho- chytrium dendrobatidis can be a fatal pathogen in poison dart frogs. The experimentally-induced disease in these frogs resembled cases of cutaneous chytridiomycosis that have recently been described in several other species of captive and wild amphibians. -
2009 Conservation Impact Report
2009 Conservation Impact Report Introduction AZA-accredited zoos and aquariums serve as conservation centers that are concerned about ecosystem health, take responsibility for species survival, contribute to research, conservation, and education, and provide society the opportunity to develop personal connections with the animals in their care. Whether breeding and re-introducing endangered species, rescuing and rehabilitating sick and injured animals, maintaining far-reaching educational and outreach programs or supporting and conducting in-situ and ex-situ research and field conservation projects, zoos and aquariums play a vital role in maintaining our planet’s diverse wildlife and natural habitats while engaging the public to appreciate and participate in conservation. In 2009, 127 of AZA’s 238 accredited institutions and certified-related facilities contributed data for the 2009 Conservation Impact Report. A summary of the 1,762 conservation efforts these institutions participated in within ~60 countries is provided. In addition, a list of individual projects is broken out by state and zoological institution. This report was compiled by Shelly Grow (AZA Conservation Biologist) as well as Jamie Shockley and Katherine Zdilla (AZA Volunteer Interns). This report, along with those from previous years, is available on the AZA Web site at: http://www.aza.org/annual-report-on-conservation-and-science/. 2009 AZA Conservation Projects Grevy's Zebra Trust ARGENTINA National/International Conservation Support CANADA Temaiken Foundation Health -
Twenty-Fifth Meeting of the Animals Committee
AC25 Doc. 22 (Rev. 1) Annex 3 (English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais) Annex 3 Fauna: new species and other changes relating to species listed in the EC wildlife trade regulations – Report compiled by UNEP-WCMC to the European Commission, March, 2011 AC25 Doc. 22 (Rev. 1) Annex 3 – p. 1 Fauna: new species and other taxonomic changes relating to species listed in the EC wildlife trade regulations March, 2011 A report to the European Commission Directorate General E - Environment ENV.E.2. – Environmental Agreements and Trade by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre AC25 Doc. 22 (Rev. 1) Annex 3 – p. 2 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org CITATION UNEP-WCMC. 2011. Fauna: new species and other taxonomic changes relating to species ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION listed in the EC wildlife trade regulations. A MONITORING CENTRE report to the European Commission. UNEP- The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring WCMC, Cambridge. Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, UK, is the specialist biodiversity information and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run PREPARED FOR cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the DISCLAIMER centre of decision-making. Through the analysis and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge The contents of this report do not necessarily the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and reflect the views or policies of UNEP or timely information for conventions, countries contributory organisations. -
Radiation and Hybridization of the Little Devil Poison Frog (Oophaga Sylvatica) in Ecuador
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/072181; this version posted August 30, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Roland et al. final version for bioRxiv preprint Little Devil poison frog population genetics Radiation and hybridization of the Little Devil poison frog (Oophaga sylvatica) in Ecuador Alexandre B. Roland1, Juan C. Santos2, Bella C. Carriker3, Stephanie N. Caty1, Elicio E. Tapia4, Luis A. Coloma4, 5, and Lauren A. O’Connell1* 1 FAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 8460, USA 3 Lakeside High School, Seattle, WA 98125, USA 4 Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios, Fundación Otonga, San Rafael, Quito, Ecuador 5 Universidad Regional Amazónica (Ikiam), Muyuna, Tena, Ecuador * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Geographic variation of color pattern in the South American poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) is an intriguing evolutionary phenomenon. These chemically defended anurans use bright aposematic colors to warn potential predators of their unpalatibility. However, aposematic signals are frequency-dependent and individuals deviating from a local model are at a higher risk of predation. The well-known examples of Batesian and Müllerian mimics, hymenopterans (wasps and bees) and Heliconius butterflies, both support the benefits of unique models with relatively high frequencies. However, extreme diversity in the aposematic signal has been documented in the poison frogs of the genus Dendrobates, especially in the Oophaga subgenus. -
Transcriptomic Signatures of Experimental Alkaloid Consumption in a Poison Frog
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Digitale Bibliothek Braunschweig G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Transcriptomic Signatures of Experimental Alkaloid Consumption in a Poison Frog Eugenia Sanchez 1,2,* , Ariel Rodríguez 3 , Jose H. Grau 4, Stefan Lötters 5, Sven Künzel 6, 7 8,9 10 11, Ralph A. Saporito , Eva Ringler , Stefan Schulz , Katharina C. Wollenberg Valero y 1, and Miguel Vences y 1 Zoological Institute, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 3 Institut fur Zoologie, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 4 Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, 10115 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] 5 Biogeography Department, Trier University, 54296 Trier, Germany; [email protected] 6 Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany; [email protected] 7 Department of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118, USA; [email protected] 8 Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, and University of Vienna, A-1210 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 9 Department of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria 10 Institute of Organic Chemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; [email protected] 11 Department of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston-Upon Hull 01482, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.