DOCSLIB.ORG

Reference ID: 4734770 Dexamethasone Is Not Recommended Outside of Controlled Clinical Trials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reference ID: 4734770 Dexamethasone Is Not Recommended Outside of Controlled Clinical Trials HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION -----------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION-------------------­ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use OPDIVO • Administer by intravenous infusion based upon recommended infusion rate safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for OPDIVO. for each indication. (2) OPDIVO (nivolumab) injection, for intravenous use • Unresectable or metastatic melanoma Initial U.S. Approval: 2014 • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) • 1 mg/kg followed by ipilimumab 3 mg/kg on the same day every 3 weeks --------------------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES---------------------------­ for 4 doses, then 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) Indications and Usage (1) 1/2021 • Adjuvant treatment of melanoma Dosage and Administration (2) 1/2021 • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) Warnings and Precautions (5) 1/2021 • Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer ---------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE---------------------------­ • 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. (2.2) OPDIVO is a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) blocking antibody indicated • 360 mg every 3 weeks with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks and for the treatment of: 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy. (2.2) Melanoma • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) • patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, as a single agent or in • Malignant pleural mesothelioma combination with ipilimumab. (1.1) • 360 mg every 3 weeks with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. (2.2) • patients with melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease • Advanced renal cell carcinoma who have undergone complete resection, in the adjuvant setting. (1.2) • 3 mg/kg followed by ipilimumab 1 mg/kg on the same day every 3 weeks Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) for 4 doses, then 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) • adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer expressing PD-L1 • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks administered in (≥1%) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with no EGFR or ALK combination with cabozantinib 40 mg once daily without food. (2.2) genomic tumor aberrations, as first-line treatment in combination with • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) ipilimumab. (1.3) • Classical Hodgkin lymphoma • adult patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer with no • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations as first-line treatment, in • Recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck combination with ipilimumab and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) chemotherapy. (1.3) • Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma • patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and progression on or • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic • Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving OPDIVO. (1.3) • Adult and pediatric patients ≥ 40 kg: 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma every 4 weeks. (2.2) • adult patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma, as first-line • Pediatric patients < 40 kg: 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. (2.2) treatment in combination with ipilimumab. (1.4) • Adult and pediatric patients ≥ 40 kg: 3 mg/kg followed by ipilimumab Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) 1 mg/kg on the same day every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then 240 mg every 2 • patients with intermediate or poor risk advanced renal cell carcinoma, as a weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) first-line treatment in combination with ipilimumab. (1.5) • Hepatocellular carcinoma • patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, as a first-line treatment in • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) combination with cabozantinib. (1.5) • 1 mg/kg followed by ipilimumab 3 mg/kg on the same day every 3 weeks • patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti­ for 4 doses, then 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) angiogenic therapy. (1.5) • Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma • 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. (2.2) • adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma that has relapsed or a progressed after : (1.6) ---------------------DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS---------------------­ • autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and • Injection: 40 mg/4 mL, 100 mg/10 mL, and 240 mg/24 mL solution in a brentuximab vedotin, or single-dose vial. (3) • 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) ------------------------------CONTRAINDICATIONS------------------------------­ • patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head • None. (4) and neck with disease progression on or after a platinum-based therapy. (1.7) -----------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS-----------------------­ Urothelial Carcinoma • Immune-Mediated Adverse Reactions: (5.1) • patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whoa: o Immune-mediated adverse reactions, which may be severe or fatal, can • have disease progression during or following platinum-containing occur in any organ system or tissue, including the following: immune- chemotherapy mediated pneumonitis, immune-mediated colitis, immune-mediated • have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant hepatitis and hepatotoxicity, immune-mediated endocrinopathies, treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. (1.8) immune-mediated dermatologic adverse reactions, and immune- Colorectal Cancer mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction. • adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite o Monitor for early identification and management. Evaluate liver enzymes, instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) metastatic creatinine, and thyroid function at baseline and periodically during colorectal cancer that has progressed following treatment with a treatment. fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, as a single agent or in Withhold or permanently discontinue based on severity and type of a o combination with ipilimumab. (1.9) reaction. (2.3) Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) • Infusion-related reactions: Interrupt, slow the rate of infusion, or • patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have been previously treated permanently discontinue OPDIVO based on severity of reaction. (5.2) a with sorafenib, as a single agent or in combination with ipilimumab. (1.10) • Complications of allogeneic HSCT: Fatal and other serious complications Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) can occur in patient who receive allogeneic HSCT before or after being • patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic esophageal treated with a PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibody. (5.3) squamous cell carcinoma after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based • Embryo-Fetal toxicity: Can cause fetal harm. Advise females of reproductive chemotherapy. (1.11) potential of potential risk to a fetus and to use effective contraception. (5.4, a This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall 8.1, 8.3) response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this • Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma with a PD-1 or PD-L1 indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical blocking antibody in combination with a thalidomide analogue plus benefit in confirmatory trials. 1 Reference ID: 4734770 dexamethasone is not recommended outside of controlled clinical trials. • In combination with cabozantinib: diarrhea, fatigue, hepatotoxicity, palmar­ (5.5) plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, stomatitis, rash, hypertension, hypothyroidism, musculoskeletal pain, decreased appetite, nausea, ------------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS-----------------------------­ dysgeusia, abdominal pain, cough, and upper respiratory tract infection. (6.1) Most common adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) in patients were: • As a single agent: fatigue, rash, musculoskeletal pain, pruritus, diarrhea, To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Bristol-Myers nausea, asthenia, cough, dyspnea, constipation, decreased appetite, back Squibb at 1-800-721-5072 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or pain, arthralgia, upper respiratory tract infection, pyrexia, headache, www.fda.gov/medwatch. abdominal pain, and vomiting. (6.1) -----------------------USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS----------------------­ • In combination with ipilimumab: fatigue, diarrhea, rash, pruritus, nausea, • Lactation: Advise not to breastfeed. (8.2) musculoskeletal pain, pyrexia, cough, decreased appetite, vomiting, abdominal pain, dyspnea, upper respiratory tract infection, arthralgia, See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and Medication headache, hypothyroidism, decreased weight, and dizziness. (6.1) Guide. • In combination with ipilimumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy: fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, diarrhea, rash, decreased appetite, constipation, and pruritus. (6.1) Revised: 1/2021 FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION: CONTENTS* 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE 8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS 1.1 Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma 8.1 Pregnancy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADC Therapeutics SA (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of July, 2020. Commission File Number: 001-39071 ADC Therapeutics SA (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Biopôle Route de la Corniche 3B 1066 Epalinges Switzerland (Address of principal executive office) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F: Form 20-F ☒ Form 40-F Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐ SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ADC Therapeutics SA Date: July 6, 2020 By: /s/ Dominique Graz Name: Dominique Graz Title: General Counsel EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No. Description 99.1 Press release dated July 6, 2020 Exhibit 99.1 ADC Therapeutics Announces U.S. Food and Drug Administration Has Lifted Partial Clinical Hold on Pivotal Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Camidanlumab Tesirine Lausanne, Switzerland — July 6, 2020 — ADC Therapeutics SA (NYSE:ADCT), a clinical-stage oncology-focused biotechnology company leading the development and commercialization of next-generation antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) with highly potent and targeted pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer technology, today announced that the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Vs. Nivolumab In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Comparative efectiveness of pembrolizumab vs. nivolumab in patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC Pengfei Cui1,2,4, Ruixin Li2,4, Ziwei Huang3,2,4, Zhaozhen Wu3,2, Haitao Tao2, Sujie Zhang2 & Yi Hu1,2,3* The efcacies of pembrolizumab and nivolumab have never been directly compared in a real-world study. Therefore, we sought to retrospectively evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) and the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with recurrent or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting. This study included patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC diagnosed between September 1, 2015 and August 31, 2019, who were treated with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors at the Cancer Center of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. PFS was estimated for each treatment group using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. The multivariate analysis of PFS was performed with Cox proportional hazards regression models. A total of 255 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors were identifed. The ORR was signifcantly higher in the pembrolizumab group than in the nivolumab group, while PFS was not signifcantly diferent between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the ORR was signifcantly higher for pembrolizumab than for nivolumab in patients in the frst-line therapy subgroup and in those in the combination therapy as frst-line therapy subgroup. Survival analysis of patients receiving combination therapy as second- or further-line therapy showed that nivolumab had better efcacy than pembrolizumab. However, the multivariate analysis revealed no signifcant diference in PFS between patients treated with pembrolizumab and those treated with nivolumab regardless of the subgroup.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutaneous Adverse Effects of Biologic Medications
    REVIEW CME MOC Selena R. Pasadyn, BA Daniel Knabel, MD Anthony P. Fernandez, MD, PhD Christine B. Warren, MD, MS Cleveland Clinic Lerner College Department of Pathology Co-Medical Director of Continuing Medical Education; Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic; of Medicine of Case Western and Department of Dermatology, W.D. Steck Chair of Clinical Dermatology; Director of Clinical Assistant Professor, Cleveland Clinic Reserve University, Cleveland, OH Cleveland Clinic Medical and Inpatient Dermatology; Departments of Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Dermatology and Pathology, Cleveland Clinic; Assistant Reserve University, Cleveland, OH Clinical Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH Cutaneous adverse effects of biologic medications ABSTRACT iologic therapy encompasses an expo- B nentially expanding arena of medicine. Biologic therapies have become widely used but often As the name implies, biologic therapies are de- cause cutaneous adverse effects. The authors discuss the rived from living organisms and consist largely cutaneous adverse effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) of proteins, sugars, and nucleic acids. A clas- alpha inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sic example of an early biologic medication is inhibitors, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors insulin. These therapies have revolutionized (TKIs), and cell surface-targeted monoclonal antibodies, medicine and offer targeted therapy for an including how to manage these reactions
    [Show full text]
  • Chelsea & Westminster Healthcare Trust Drugs Committee
    Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Trust Medicines Group Summary of Main Points from the Meeting held on Monday 12th December 2016 2. Minutes and Summary Notes from last meeting The Minutes and Summary notes from the November 2016 Medicines Group meeting were approved and will be circulated. 3. Matters Arising The Group noted the matters arising from the previous meeting. 4. Business to be transacted by the Medicines Group 4.1 Formulary Applications Ex-panel Deferasirox (Exjade®) 90mg, 180mg and 360mg Tablets (Novartis) Exjade® film coated tablets have been introduced in November 2016. These will take the place of the dispersible tabs which will be phased out and no longer available from June 2017. Costs are equivalent to the dispersible tablets. The new film coated tablets have a number of advantages over the dispersible tablets including: - Can be swallowed whole - Lactose free - No food restrictions - No mixing/preparation required. Decision: Approved DuoResp Spiromax® 160 micrograms / 4.5 micrograms (Budesonide & Formoterol) Inhalation Powder (Teva) Request by the Respiratory Team for the management of asthma in line with the BTS guidelines where a ® combination of an inhaled long acting B2 agonist and corticosteroid is indicated. Adding DuoResp Spiromax to the formulary will provide an increased choice of devices available to prescribe. Symbicort Turbohaler® is already included on the formulary. DuoResp Spiromax® is more cost-effective than Symbicort Turbohaler® and is currently included on the NWLIF and GPs have already started to prescribe it. Decision: Approved Sodium Valpoate (Epilim Chronosphere®) 50mg and 100mg Modified Release Granules (Sanofi) Requested by the Paediatric Neurology Team for paediatric patients requiring sodium valpoate in very low doses.
    [Show full text]
  • (Anti-CTLA4 Antibody) Causes Regression of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Associated with Enteritis and Hypophysitis James C
    CLINICAL STUDY Ipilimumab (Anti-CTLA4 Antibody) Causes Regression of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Associated With Enteritis and Hypophysitis James C. Yang,* Marybeth Hughes,* Udai Kammula,* Richard Royal,* Richard M. Sherry,* Suzanne L. Topalian,* Kimberly B. Suri,* Catherine Levy,* Tamika Allen,* Sharon Mavroukakis,* Israel Lowy,w Donald E. White,* and Steven A. Rosenberg* (J Immunother 2007;30:825–830) Summary: The inhibitory receptor CTLA4 has a key role in peripheral tolerance of T cells for both normal and tumor- associated antigens. Murine experiments suggested that block- ade of CTLA4 might have antitumor activity and a clinical t has become clear that T-cell responses are under the experience with the blocking antibody ipilimumab in patients Icontrol of both activating and inhibitory coreceptors.1,2 with metastatic melanoma did show durable tumor regressions The interaction of the T-cell receptor with its cognate in some patients. Therefore, a phase II study of ipilimumab was epitope, presented by the correct major histocompatibility conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer with a complex molecule (‘‘signal one’’) is only one component primary end point of response by Response Evaluation Criteria of the complex signaling required to optimally activate a in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Two sequential cohorts T cell to proliferate, differentiate, and exhibit effector received either 3 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg or all doses at functions.3 The critical role of inhibitory signaling in 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (with no intention of comparing cohort preventing, limiting, or terminating T-cell responses has response rates). Major toxicities were enteritis and endocrine recently become apparent.4 T-regulatory cells (T-regs) deficiencies of presumed autoimmune origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Nivolumab in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
    PRESCRIBER'S CORNER Section Editors: Christopher J. Campen and Beth Eaby-Sandy Nivolumab in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer ANDREA DEEL, PharmD From Kingsport Hematology Oncology, ung cancer is the leading NSCLC has led to the development of Kingsport, Tennessee cause of cancer deaths in agents that target specific molecular Author’s disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article. the United States (Ameri- pathways in cancer cells (Kerr et al., Correspondence to: Andrea Deel, PharmD, can Cancer Society [ACS], 2014). Targeted therapies are a signifi- Kingsport Hematology Oncology, 4485 West L2015). Non–small cell lung cancer cant step forward in treating patients Stone Drive, Suite 200, Kingsport TN 37660. (NSCLC) is one of the most common with tumors that contain specific mu- E-mail: [email protected] types of the disease and accounts tations in these pathways. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2016.7.2.7 for 85% to 90% of lung cancer cases In the United States, several agents © 2016 Harborside Press® (ACS, 2015). Nonsquamous NSCLC have been approved to target these accounts for approximately 45% to tumors. They include erlotinib, afa- 60% of all lung cancer cases, where- tinib (Gilotrif ), and gefitinib (Iressa), as squamous NSCLC accounts for which target EGFR signaling; crizo- approximately 25% to 30% of all lung tinib (Xalkori) and ceritinib (Zykadia), cancer cases (ACS, 2015). which target ALK rearrangements; Survival rates vary depending on bevacizumab (Avastin) and ramuci- the stage and type of the cancer and rumab (Cyramza), which target vascu- when it is diagnosed. For stage IV lar endothelial growth factor (VEGF) NSCLC, the 5-year survival rate is 1% signaling.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibody–Drug Conjugates: the Last Decade
    pharmaceuticals Review Antibody–Drug Conjugates: The Last Decade Nicolas Joubert 1,* , Alain Beck 2 , Charles Dumontet 3,4 and Caroline Denevault-Sabourin 1 1 GICC EA7501, Equipe IMT, Université de Tours, UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, 31 Avenue Monge, 37200 Tours, France; [email protected] 2 Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Centre d’Immunologie Pierre Fabre, 5 Avenue Napoléon III, 74160 Saint Julien en Genevois, France; [email protected] 3 Cancer Research Center of Lyon (CRCL), INSERM, 1052/CNRS 5286/UCBL, 69000 Lyon, France; [email protected] 4 Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 August 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2020; Published: 14 September 2020 Abstract: An armed antibody (antibody–drug conjugate or ADC) is a vectorized chemotherapy, which results from the grafting of a cytotoxic agent onto a monoclonal antibody via a judiciously constructed spacer arm. ADCs have made considerable progress in 10 years. While in 2009 only gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg®) was used clinically, in 2020, 9 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ADCs are available, and more than 80 others are in active clinical studies. This review will focus on FDA-approved and late-stage ADCs, their limitations including their toxicity and associated resistance mechanisms, as well as new emerging strategies to address these issues and attempt to widen their therapeutic window. Finally, we will discuss their combination with conventional chemotherapy or checkpoint inhibitors, and their design for applications beyond oncology, to make ADCs the magic bullet that Paul Ehrlich dreamed of. Keywords: antibody–drug conjugate; ADC; bioconjugation; linker; payload; cancer; resistance; combination therapies 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Imatinib (Gleevec™)
    Biologicals What Are They? When Did All of this Happen? There are Clear Benefits. Are there also Risks? Brian J Ward Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Global Health, Immunity & Infectious Diseases Grand Rounds – March 2016 Biologicals Biological therapy involves the use of living organisms, substances derived from living organisms, or laboratory-produced versions of such substances to treat disease. National Cancer Institute (USA) What Effects Do Steroids Have on Immune Responses? This is your immune system on high dose steroids projects.accessatlanta.com • Suppress innate and adaptive responses • Shut down inflammatory responses in progress • Effects on neutrophils, macrophages & lymphocytes • Few problems because use typically short-term Virtually Every Cell and Pathway in Immune System ‘Target-able’ (Influenza Vaccination) Reed SG et al. Nature Medicine 2013 Nakaya HI et al. Nature Immunology 2011 Landscape - 2013 Antisense (30) Cell therapy (69) Gene Therapy (46) Monoclonal Antibodies (308) Recombinant Proteins (93) Vaccines (250) Other (81) http://www.phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/biologicsoverview2013.pdf Therapeutic Category Drugs versus Biologics Patented Ibuprofen (Advil™) Generic Ibuprofen BioSimilars/BioSuperiors ? www.drugbank.ca Patented Etanercept (Enbrel™) BioSimilar Etanercept Etacept™ (India) Biologics in Cancer Therapy Therapeutic Categories • Hormonal Therapy • Monoclonal antibodies • Cytokine therapy • Classical vaccine strategies • Adoptive T-cell or dendritic cells transfer • Oncolytic
    [Show full text]
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy-Associated Encephalitis: a Case Series and Review of the Literature
    Original article | Published 23 November 2020 | doi:10.4414/smw.2020.20377 Cite this as: Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20377 Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-associated encephalitis: a case series and review of the literature Stuby Johanna, Herren Thomasb, Schwegler Naumburger Guidoc, Papet Claudiad, Rudiger Alaina a Internal Medicine, Department II, Limmattal Hospital Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland b Cardiology, Department II, Limmattal Hospital Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland c Neurology, Department II, Limmattal Hospital Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland d Oncology/Haematology, Department II, Limmattal Hospital Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland Summary EEG should be performed. Therapy with intravenous corti- costeroids is recommended. Steroid unresponsiveness is BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can rare and should lead to a review of the diagnosis. Alterna- cause a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events, tive treatment options are IVIG, plasma exchange therapy including encephalitis. To date, no prospective ran- and rituximab. domised controlled trials examining the patient charac- teristics, treatment and outcomes of ICI-associated en- Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab, pem- cephalitis have been published. Therefore, we aimed to brolizumab, ipilimumab, encephalitis review case reports and to provide recommendations for the management of ICI-associated encephalitis. Introduction METHODS: A literature search using Google Scholar and Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) re-establish the anti- PubMed was performed in December 2019. Published tumour activity of T-lymphocytes by blocking immune in- case reports and case series of ICI-associated encephali- hibitory receptors such as programmed cell death protein 1 tis were reviewed, and a case series from the Limmattal (PD-1, e.g., nivolumab, pembrolizumab and lambrolizum- Hospital in Schlieren, Switzerland was added.
    [Show full text]
  • BAVENCIO (Avelumab) Injection, for Intravenous Use Function
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ------------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS----------------------­ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use • Immune-mediated pneumonitis: Withhold for moderate pneumonitis; BAVENCIO safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for permanently discontinue for severe, life-threatening, or recurrent moderate BAVENCIO. pneumonitis. (5.1) • Hepatotoxicity and immune-mediated hepatitis: Monitor for changes in liver ® BAVENCIO (avelumab) injection, for intravenous use function. Withhold for moderate hepatitis; permanently discontinue for Initial U.S. Approval: 2017 severe or life-threatening hepatitis. (5.2) • Immune-mediated colitis: Withhold for moderate or severe colitis; ----------------------------RECENT MAJOR CHANGES-------------------------- permanently discontinue for life-threatening or recurrent severe colitis. (5.3) Indication and Usage (1.3) 05/2019 • Immune-mediated endocrinopathies: Withhold for severe or life-threatening Dosage and Administration (2.2, 2.3) 10/2018 endocrinopathies (5.4) Dosage and Administration (2.4, 2.5) 05/2019 • Immune-mediated nephritis and renal dysfunction: Withhold for moderate Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.8) 05/2019 or severe nephritis and renal dysfunction; permanently discontinue for life- threatening nephritis or renal dysfunction. (5.5) ----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE--------------------------­ • Infusion-related reactions: Interrupt or slow the rate of infusion for mild or BAVENCIO is a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) blocking antibody moderate infusion-related reactions. Stop the infusion and permanently indicated for: discontinue BAVENCIO for severe or life-threatening infusion-related • Adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older with metastatic Merkel cell a reactions. (5.7) carcinoma (MCC). (1.1) • Major adverse cardiovascular events: Optimize management of • Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) cardiovascular risk factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Interactions of Antibody Drugs Targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in Immuno-Oncology
    molecules Review Molecular Interactions of Antibody Drugs Targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in Immuno-Oncology Hyun Tae Lee , Sang Hyung Lee and Yong-Seok Heo * Department of Chemistry, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea; [email protected] (H.T.L.); [email protected] (S.H.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-450-3408; Fax: +82-2-3436-5382 Academic Editor: Silvano Geremia Received: 4 March 2019; Accepted: 22 March 2019; Published: 26 March 2019 Abstract: Cancer cells can evade immune surveillance through the molecular interactions of immune checkpoint proteins, including programmed death 1 (PD-1), PD-L1, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Since 2011, the FDA-approved antibody drugs ipilimumab (Yervoy®), nivolumab (Opdivo®), pembrolizumab (Keytruda®), cemiplimab (Libtayo®), atezolizumab (Tecentriq®), durvalumab (Imfinzi®), and avelumab (Bavencio®), which block the immune checkpoint proteins, have brought about a significant breakthrough in the treatment of a wide range of cancers, as they can induce durable therapeutic responses. In recent years, crystal structures of the antibodies against PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 have been reported. In this review, we describe the latest structural studies of these monoclonal antibodies and their interactions with the immune checkpoint proteins. A comprehensive analysis of the interactions of these immune checkpoint blockers can provide a better understanding of their therapeutic mechanisms of action. The accumulation of these structural studies would provide a basis that is essential for the rational design of next-generation therapies in immuno-oncology. Keywords: crystal structure; immune checkpoint; PD-1; PD-L1; CTLA-4; cancer; therapeutic antibody 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors from Cancer to COVID-19
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 58: 145-157, 2021 Immune-checkpoint inhibitors from cancer to COVID-19: A promising avenue for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 (Review) SILVIA VIVARELLI1, LUCA FALZONE2, FRANCESCO TORINO3, GIUSEPPA SCANDURRA4, GIULIA RUSSO5, ROBERTO BORDONARO6, FRANCESCO PAPPALARDO5,7, DEMETRIOS A. SPANDIDOS8, GIUSEPPINA RACITI5* and MASSIMO LIBRA1,7* 1Section of General Pathology, Clinics and Oncology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, I-95123 Catania; 2Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori ‘Fondazione G. Pascale’, I-80131 Naples; 3Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, I-00133 Rome; 4Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, I-95126 Catania; 5Department of Drug Sciences, University of Catania, I-95123 Catania; 6Medical Oncology Unit, Garibaldi Hospital, I-95122 Catania; 7Research Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Tumors, University of Catania, I-95123 Catania, Italy; 8Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece Received November 5, 2020; Accepted December 14, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5159 Abstract. The severe acute respiratory syndrome associ- suffer from T-cell exhaustion, which may lead to viral sepsis ated coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses a threat to human and an increased mortality rate. It has been observed that cancer life worldwide. Since early March, 2020, coronavirus patients, who usually are immunocompromised, may restore disease 2019 (COVID-19), characterized by an acute and often their anti-tumoral immune response when treated with ICIs. severe form of pneumonia, has been declared a pandemic. Moreover, viral-infected mice and humans, exhibit a T-cell This has led to a boom in biomedical research studies at all exhaustion, which is also observed following SARS-CoV-2 stages of the pipeline, from the in vitro to the clinical phase.
    [Show full text]