And the Mechanic Arts: the Franklin Institute and Science in Industrial America, 1824-1976

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And the Mechanic Arts: the Franklin Institute and Science in Industrial America, 1824-1976 A. Michal McMahon THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE "BRIGHT SCIENCE" AND THE MECHANIC ARTS: THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE AND SCIENCE IN INDUSTRIAL AMERICA, 1824-1976 "Bright science too, beneath our sacred dome, Shall find a last retreat, a fav'rite home, And, freed from schoolmen's trammels, shall impart Her cheering influence to each useful art." Mathew Carey's American Museum, 17891 Philadelphia's technological and scientific community founded the Franklin Institute of the State of Pennsylvania during the 1820s in response to the emergence of industrialization and to the rise of experimental physical science. These momentous events re- leased energies carrying the organization through crucial phases in the development of the nation. Because the Institute's one-hundred- and-fifty-plus-years parallel the making of the industrial order in America, its work exposes the shifting contours of technological and scientific activity in the culture. In the nineteenth century, the Institute's scientific work reflected first the experimental tradition and then the rise of university-trained engineers and engineering knowledge refined by mathematics and industrial necessity. In our own century, the Franklin Institute has created both a basic science research institution in the tradition of England's Cavendish Labora- tory and an applied science research laboratory serving military, governmental, and industrial needs. The society began its work in 1824 with men like Samuel Vaughan Merrick, a manufacturer; William H. Keating, a professor of min- eralogical chemistry at the University of Pennsylvania; and Mathew 1. Quoted in Silvio A. Bidini, Thinkers and Tinkers (New York 1975), vii. 351 352 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY Carey, a national leader in the movement to promote American manufacturers. The Institute's founders established formal classes, popular lectures on science and technology, a long-running series of industrial exhibitions, a library, and a committee to oversee tech- nological innovation in America. In 1826, the Journal of the Franklin Institute began publication. From this industrial community, leading members of the first generation of organized physical scientists found their initial sup- port. University of Pennsylvania physicist Alexander Dallas Bache, a great-grandson of Benjamin Franklin and at mid-century the nation's leading scientific administrator, contributed greatly to the Institute's initial research efforts. Sharing the manufacturers' desires to promote machine production and the useful arts, physical scientists like Bache lent their knowledge and skills to the needs of the young manufacturers' organization. The Institute's successful introduction of experimental science to Philadelphia technologists rested on a tradition already a half- century old. Since the eighteenth century, the industrial movement had included constant attempts to join science with the useful, or mechanic arts. This American movement actually grew alongside England's industrial revolution. Yet the colonial version was only a shadow of the English experience. Attempts to create the reality of English industrialism in the colonies invariably failed; accordingly, early American promoters of industrial growth tended more to praise industrial activity and progress than to institute it. Colonial litera- ture frequently mixed scientific opinions and information with discussions of the practical concerns of the people and land. Whether in Thomas Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia, in Benjamin Franklin's Essay on the New Invented Pennsylvania Stove, or in the Trans- actions of the American Philosophical Society, colonial savants wrote passionately on agricultural experiments or the need for increased manufactures. Such writings reinforced the progressive colonial's desire to establish manufactories in the New World. In 1769, the American Philosophical Society founded a short-lived linen manufactory; by 1790, several similar, equally unsuccessful attempts had been made to implant England's industrial revolution in America. 2 Even so, 2. Samuel Rezneck, "The Rise and Early Development of Industrial Consciousness in the United States, 1760-1830, "Journal of Economic and Business History, 4 (1932):784 passim. FRANKLIN INSTITUTE 353 these first fumbling attempts were crucial events in the making of the industrial order. The formation in 1787 of the Pennsylvania Society for the En- couragement of Manufactures and Useful Arts was one such event. Established in Philadelphia, the Society brought together a number of energetic Americans. The eighty-three-year-old Benjamin Franklin accepted a patron's role, as he had done at the Constitutional Con- vention. Tench Cox served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under Alexander Hamilton; from 1790 to 1815, he wrote a series of important reports on the growth of American manufactures. Among the most active members was publisher Mathew Carey, a Scottish immigrant and editor of the American Museum. Others in the group operated chemical manufactories, or already had at- tempted to found textile factories. The society's own effort to establish a manufactory ended in a fire in 1790.8 Though Carey was the youngest of the main group forming the Pennsylvania Society, his perceptions of the industrial revolution compared closely with the venerable Franklin's. Franklin perceived the centrality of invention and scientific work to the future of Amer- ican civilization, believing inventions would be "prolific."4 Similarly, the poem in Mathew Carey's American Museum yearned passionately for a future where "Bright Science. freed from schoolmen's tram- mels, shall impart her cheering influence to each useful art." Already that was happening in the application of astronomical knowledge to navigation. Industrial application came as physical scientists began to examine the properties of steam and the steam engine, and to look at technology generally.5 This awareness of the importance of scientific experimentation to industrialization grew with the young nation. The Franklins and Careys knew instinctively what modern historians forcefully assert: a primary feature of modern industrial revolutions is the accelerated application of science to pro- duction.6 3. Ibid. 795. 4. Franklin to Rev. John Lathrop, 31 May 1788, John Bigelow, ed., The Works of Benjamin Franklin, 9 (1904):429. 5. Brooke Hindle, The Pursuit of Science in Revolutionary America (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1956), 166-169, 174 ff, 352. On the interest in industrial application of scientific research see "Address before the Albany Institute, October 30, 1824, "The Papers of Joseph Henry, I (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, D.C. 1972):78- 92, 241-242. 6. Stuart Bruchey, The Roots of American Economic Growth, 1607-1861 (New York 1968), pp. 14-15; David S. Landes, The Unbound Prometheus (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1969), pp. 2-7. 354 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY The Pennsylvania Society lasted only a few years, yet Carey's pro- motional activities extended well into the nineteenth century, liter- ally joining the chiefly ideological eighteenth-century movement with the more concrete period of actual industrialization. Besides writing and publishing a steady stream of pamphlets on American manufactures, Carey encouraged organizational efforts to win greater influence with the national government. In the 1820s alone, he campaigned for a strong, protective tariff, helped form an internal improvements society, and, for the Franklin Institute's first two years, chaired the Board of Managers. 7 The Institute's connections to the eighteenth-century industrial movement went beyond Carey, however. The society's intellectual and social roots led to the energetic mechanics of the revolutionary era and to the vibrant spirit of Franklin as experimental scientist, tradesman, and inventor. Later, during the 1 820s, the manufacturing movement came together with experimental science as mechanics' institutes organized throughout the country. In Philadelphia, Samuel Vaughan Merrick, the recent inheritor of an iron foundry, initiated both the Franklin Institute and its scientific activity. He needed the Institute in the beginning to learn the new industrial technology so he could succeed as an iron founder. Within five years, however, Merrick began to push the fledgling organization beyond the bounds of a mechanics' society. He first wrested con- trol of the journal from its editor, who aimed solely at the common mechanic. Though not against mechanics' education, Merrick wanted "original matter" in the Journal. He invited the newly-ap- pointed professor of natural philosophy, Alexander Dallas Bache, to join the Institute and contribute reports on his researches. Merrick also translated articles from French scientific periodicals for the Journal. That same year, in 1829, Merrick initiated the Institute's first large-scale experimental project on water wheels and water- power.' The Institute's waterpower investigations consisted of "a series of experiments" seeking the "value of water as a moving power, and the relative effect produced by it upon wheels of different construc- tions." The result of tests upon the various water wheels-overshot, pitchback, breast, and undershot-would be, one of the experimenters 7. Mathew Carey, "Diary, 15 December 1822-16 June 1826," Special Collections,' Van Pelt Library, University of Pennsylvania. 8. Bache to Merrick, 11 March 1829, Franklin Institute Archives (hereafter Fl); Minutes, Board of Managers, Franklin Institute, 12 March 1829, Fl. FRANKLIN
Recommended publications
  • Science, Education, and Antebellum Reform: the Case of Alexander Dallas Bache Author(S): Hugh R
    Science, Education, and Antebellum Reform: The Case of Alexander Dallas Bache Author(s): Hugh R. Slotten Source: History of Education Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3, (Autumn, 1991), pp. 323-342 Published by: History of Education Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/368371 Accessed: 02/05/2008 14:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=hes. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We enable the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Science, Education, and Antebellum Reform: The Case of Alexander Dallas Bache Hugh R. Slotten As primary civilizing forces, science and formal education have achieved a position of dominance and prestige in modern society.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Resume Ed 049 958 So 000 779 Institution Pub
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 049 958 SO 000 779 AUTHCE Nakosteen, Mehdi TITLE Conflicting Educational Ideals in America, 1775-1831: Documentary Source Book. INSTITUTION Colorado Univ., Boulder. School of Education. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 480p. EDES PRICE EDES Price MF-SC.65 HC-$16.45 DESCRIPTORS *Annotated Bibliographies, Cultural Factors, *Educational History, Educational Legislation, *Educational Practice, Educational Problems, *Educational Theories, Historical Reviews, Resource Materials, Social Factors, *United States History IDENTIFIERS * Documentary History ABSTRACT Educational thought among political, religious, educational, and other social leaders during the formative decades of American national life was the focus of the author's research. The initial objective was the discovery cf primary materials from the period to fill a gap in the history of American educational thought and practice. Extensive searching cf unpublished and uncatalogued library holdings, mainly those of major public and university libraries, yielded a significant quantity of primary documents for this bibliography. The historical and contemporary works, comprising approximately 4,500 primary and secondary educational resources with some surveying the cultural setting of educational thinking in this period, are organized around 26 topics and 109 subtopics with cross-references. Among the educational issues covered by the cited materials are: public vs. private; coed vs. separate; academic freedom, teacher education; teaching and learning theory; and, equality of educational opportunity. In addition to historical surveys and other secondary materials, primary documents include: government documents, books, journals, newspapers, and speeches. (Author/DJB) CO Lir\ 0 CY% -1- OCY% w CONFLICTING EDUCATIONAL I D E A L S I N A M E R I C A , 1 7 7 5 - 1 8 3 1 : DOCUMENTARY SOURCE B 0 0 K by MEHDI NAKOSTEEN Professor of History and Philosophy of Education University of Colorado U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical Sketch Of
    Genealogy and Historical Notes of Spamer and Smith Families of Maryland Appendix 2. SSeelleecctteedd CCoollllaatteerraall GGeenneeaallooggiieess ffoorr SSttrroonnggllyy CCrroossss--ccoonnnneecctteedd aanndd HHiissttoorriiccaall FFaammiillyy GGrroouuppss WWiitthhiinn tthhee EExxtteennddeedd SSmmiitthh FFaammiillyy Bayard Bache Cadwalader Carroll Chew Coursey Dallas Darnall Emory Foulke Franklin Hodge Hollyday Lloyd McCall Patrick Powel Tilghman Wright NEW EDITION Containing Additions & Corrections to June 2011 and with Illustrations Earle E. Spamer 2008 / 2011 Selected Strongly Cross-connected Collateral Genealogies of the Smith Family Note The “New Edition” includes hyperlinks embedded in boxes throughout the main genealogy. They will, when clicked in the computer’s web-browser environment, automatically redirect the user to the pertinent additions, emendations and corrections that are compiled in the separate “Additions and Corrections” section. Boxed alerts look like this: Also see Additions & Corrections [In the event that the PDF hyperlink has become inoperative or misdirects, refer to the appropriate page number as listed in the Additions and Corrections section.] The “Additions and Corrections” document is appended to the end of the main text herein and is separately paginated using Roman numerals. With a web browser on the user’s computer the hyperlinks are “live”; the user may switch back and forth between the main text and pertinent additions, corrections, or emendations. Each part of the genealogy (Parts I and II, and Appendices 1 and 2) has its own “Additions and Corrections” section. The main text of the New Edition is exactly identical to the original edition of 2008; content and pagination are not changed. The difference is the presence of the boxed “Additions and Corrections” alerts, which are superimposed on the page and do not affect text layout or pagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Eulogy on Prof. Alexander Dallas Bache, Late Superintendent of the United States Coast Survey
    /y E U L () G Y ON PROF. ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE. I.A I K SUPERINTENDENT OF THE UNITED STATES COAST SURVEY, PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, ETC. 15 V PROF. JOSEPH HENRY. * r < |{ K I All V O I T H K SMITHSONIAN INS T I T 11 I ION. PREPARED AT THE REQUEST OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, AND ALSO OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. FROM THE REPORT OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION FOR THE YEAR 1870. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1872. EULOGY ox PROF. ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE, LATE SUPERINTENDENT OF THE UNITED STATES COAST SURVEY, PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, ETC. ur / N PROF. JOSEPH HENRY, SECRET ABY OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. PREPARED AT TIIE REQUEST OF TIIE BOARD OF REGENTS OF TIIE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, AND ALSO OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. FROM THE REPORT OF TIIE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION FOR THE YEAR 1870. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1872. EULOGY ON PROF. ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE, LATE SUPERINTENDENT OF THE UNITED STATES COAST SURVEY. Prof. Joseph Henry. Prepared at the request of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, and also of the National Academy of Sciences. Alexander Dallas Baciie, whose life and character form the sub- ject of the following eulogy, was the son ofBichard Bache, one of eight children of Sarah, the only daughter of Dr. Benjamin Franklin. His mother was Sophia Burret Dallas, daughter of Alexander J. Dallas, and sister of George M. Dallas, whose names are well known in the history of this country, the former as Secretary of the Treasury, and the latter as Vice-President of the United States, and subsequently as minister to the Court of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Dallas Bache
    ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY Alexander Dallas Bache “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE 1806 July 19, Saturday: Alexander Dallas Bache was born in Philadelphia, the son of the journalist Richard Bache, Jr. and Sophia Burrell Dallas (he was thus a great-grandson of Benjamin Franklin). Josiah Gregg was born in Overton Country, Tennessee (when he was 6 his family would trek to Missouri; he would suffer all his life from TB). IT WAS JUST A COUPLE OF BABIES. NOBODY COULD GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT Alexander Dallas Bache “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE ALEXANDER DALLAS BACHE 1807 February 10, Tuesday: The US Congress authorized a survey of the nation’s coasts and harbors: “An Act to Provide for Surveying the Coasts of the United States.” READ THE FULL TEXT Theodore Sedgwick Fay was born in New-York, a son of the attorney Joseph Dewey Fay (1779-1825). Like his father, who had studied law in the office of Alexander Hamilton, would study for the law, although he would never practice, going instead into the field of diplomacy. Friend Stephen Wanton Gould wrote in his journal: 3 day 10 of 2 M / Our friend Asa Russel of New Bedford called at the shop this afternoon, with whom I had much conversation on a subject which has deeply affected the minds of many & caused the Land to mourn for the wound which Zion has felt from the fall of a late dignified Servant Asa spoke feelingly on the subject & hoped it might be a warning to those who think they stand to take heed lest they fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Dallas Bache Papers, 1821-1869
    Alexander Dallas Bache Papers, 1821-1869 Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 1 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 1 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 3 Series 1: DIARIES, 1836-1837................................................................................ 3 Series 2: OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE, 1836-1841....................................... 4 Series 3: INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, 1821-1866........................................ 5 Series 4: COAST SURVEY PAPERS, 1849, 1853-1854......................................... 6 Series 5: LIGHTHOUSE BOARD PAPERS, 1853-1864.......................................... 7 Series 6: LECTURES, REPORTS, AND PAPERS................................................... 9 Series 7: SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOTES, CIRCA 1847-1855................... 10 Series 8: LETTERS OF RECOMMENDATION FOR BACHE AS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE COAST SURVEY, 1843.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • David Rittenhouse
    Pioneers of American Science My grandson Th. Jefferson Randolph . .. goes to Philadelphia to attend a course of lectures in Natural history Anatomy & Botany. He will also attend the lecturer in Surgery. ... The museum of Mr. Peale, the garden of Mr. Hamilton, the anatomical preparations and dissections give to Philadelphia advantages in these branches of science not to be had elsewhere in America. Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Rush October 13, 1808 6 David Rittenhouse David Rittenhouse (173Z-1796) From the beginning, the College of Philadelphia had a scientific bias by Charles Willson Peale unusual at the time of its foundation. Of all the colleges which existed in Professor of astronomy, vice-provost (1779-1782), and trustee of the University the colonies prior to the Revolution, Philadelphia alone had introduced a (1782-1796). Born in Germantown, near course of study which put as much as one-third of its time into science and Philadelphia, and self-educated, Ritten­ practical study.' Nonetheless, in the colonial period, men of science house combined mathematical studies with the profession of instrument-maker remained "amateurs" in the manner of the eighteenth century-observers at his father's farm, from which he and investigators who pursued their interests in private rather than observed the transit of Venus (1769). attached to any institution. John Bartram, the first American botanist, is He conducted surveys of the boundary of Pennsylvania and constructed an reputed to have left his plow to study the natural world around him. He orrery-an instrument simulating astro­ started a botanical garden on the Schuylkill near the present grounds of nomical phenomena for a period of 5,000 the University of Pennsylvania and corresponded with Linnaeus and the years in either direction-for Princeton and the College of Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • 9783593393551.Pdf
    Table of Contents Acknowledgments................................................................................................. 9 1. Introduction The Curious Case of Alexander Dallas Bache ......................................... 11 The Revised Theory of Professionalization.............................................. 14 Science as a Profession and the American Nation-State........................ 18 Approach and Methodology ....................................................................... 21 Investigative Agenda..................................................................................... 25 2. Family Background The Franklin and Bache Families............................................................... 27 The Dallas Family ......................................................................................... 33 Tertium Quid................................................................................................. 37 Sophia Dallas Bache ..................................................................................... 41 Richard Bache’s Failure................................................................................ 45 3. A Career in Science? West Point...................................................................................................... 50 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers........................................................... 59 National Purpose........................................................................................... 64 4. Early Research and Institutional Development
    [Show full text]
  • THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE and the Making of Industrial America
    THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE And the Making of Industrial America Guide to the Microfiche Collection Edited by Stephanie A. Morris CIS Academic Editions THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE And the Making of Industrial America THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE And the Making of Industrial America Guide to the Microfiche Collection Edited by Stephanie A. Morris CIS Academic Editions Congressional Information Service, Inc. Bethesda, Maryland CIS Staff Editor-in-Chief, Special Collections August A. Imholtz, Jr. Project Editor John Heffeman Staff Assistant Monette Barreiro Production Dorothy W. Rogers, Debra G. Turnell Communications Richard K. Johnson Data Processing William DeRoche Printing Services Lee Mayer Cover Design Alberto Insua Microfilm Operations William Idol Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data CIS Academic Editions, Congressional Information Service, Inc. 4520 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 USA © 1987 by Congressional Information Service, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS NOTE FROM THE PUBLISHER vii PREFACE ix NOTE ON MICROFILMING PROCEDURES xi THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE: The Franklin Institute and the Making of Industrial America Overview 1 Education 2 Encouragement of Invention 3 Scientific Investigations 3 Alexander Dallas Bache 4 Standardization 5 Exhibitions 6 Change and the Institute 7 Bartol Research Foundation 9 Institute's New Building 9 Notes 11 List of Plates 13 Plates BIBLIOGRAPHY OF DOCUMENTS Manuscript Materials Membership Account Books 15 Minutes of Meetings 16 Sections, 1869-1923 17 Committee on Instruction 21 Special Committees 24 Correspondence 27 Exhibitions 30 Bartol Research Foundation 40 Commemorative Volumes 40 Iconographic Materials Lecture Lantern Slides 41 Welsbach Collection 43 Midvale Steel Company Collection 44 Frederick Graff Collection .
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Pennsylvania's Department of Mines, Arts, And
    The University of Pennsylvania’s Department of Mines, Arts, and Manufactures in Context Will Kearney Kearney 1 The University of Pennsylvania, as part of a restructuring of its undergraduate education,1 established the Department of Mines, Arts, and Manufactures in 1852, but courses were not offered until the 1855-56 school year. While the Department ceased to operate during the Civil War and never resumed classes, Penn’s Scientific School, later the Towne Scientific School and eventually the School of Engineering and Applied Science, rose from the remnants of the Department of Mines. Behind these institutional changes lies a broader change in what Christopher Jones, in his University of Pennsylvania Ph.D dissertation, calls the “energy landscape” of eastern Pennsylvania. This energy landscape, according to Jones, consists of the energy source and everything that it comes in contact with on its journey to the consumer, including mining, transportation, and consumption technologies and the people who use those technologies.2 But an energy landscape, or any landscape defined by technologies for that matter, also includes the knowledge economy that grows up to support technological progress. Penn’s Department of Mines, while short-lived compared to other contemporary engineering schools, was an integral part of the changing energy landscape of 19th century Pennsylvania. The Energy Landscape of Eastern Pennsylvania An energy landscape starts with an energy source – anthracite coal in the case of northeastern Pennsylvania – and adds in the people and technology that take the energy source to its consumers whether they are iron manufacturers or homeowners.3 This landscape is distinct from its place because, in a mineral-based economy like the Coal Region, the energy source is 1 A scientific course, emphasizing natural philosophy and leading to a Bachelor of Science degree, was also established alongside the classical Bachelor of Arts education in the College.
    [Show full text]
  • Harwood Family Papers M0206
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf158001c8 No online items Guide to the Harwood Family Papers M0206 Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1999 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Harwood Family M0206 1 Papers M0206 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Harwood Family Papers creator: Harwood family. Identifier/Call Number: M0206 Physical Description: 2 Linear Feet(4 boxes) Date (inclusive): 1722-1962 Scope and Contents Letters, notes, autographs, portraits, and other materials collected by the Harwood Family over a period of two hundred-fifty years. Much of the early materials, including Revolutionary War era materials, are navy and military service related. Later materials include letters from major political, financial, and literary figures. Correspondents include Herbert Hoover, Nelson A. Rockefeller, Ray Lyman Wilbur, Pearl S. Buck, and Carl Sandburg. Also included are engravings, photographs, and autographs of historical figures. Biographical / Historical Over his lifetime, Andrew Allen Harwood (1802-1884), great grandson of Benjamin Franklin, kept letters and notes of interest and autographs in a collection known as ODDS & ENDS. He willed it to his grandson, Thomas Triplett Hunter Harwood. In the year 1940 it passed into the hands of his nephew, A. A. Harwood's great grandson, Wilson Franklin Harwood (Stanford '35). A. A. Harwood's career in the Navy started with his appointment as Midshipman on the gun-brig Saranac in 1818. He retired with the rank of Rear Admiral in 1874. For this reason, much of the material he put into his odds and ends was related to the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • By Thomas Sully, 1810
    Courtesy of The Arc Museum, Princeton University GEORGE MIFFLIN DALLAS By Thomas Sully, 1810 THE LIBRARY The ^Mystery of the "Dallas Tapers I N the last hours of the troubled year 1864, George Mifflin Dallas rose from his evening meal and, as was his wont, began to pace I up and down his drawing room. He seemed particularly weary, however, and shortly bade his family "good night" with the remark that he was retiring "for a long sleep." From that sleep he never wakened. In due time his body was interred in St. Peter's church- yard, and his affairs and effects were cared for by his executors and his family; in the process there developed a tantalizing mystery. Mr. Dallas had lived a very full and interesting life. After graduat- ing from Princeton, he had entered law and politics. When his distinguished father, Alexander James Dallas, sometime Secretary of the Treasury, was in the flood tide of his success, young Dallas had been initiated into public life as Albert Gallatin's secretary on the futile peace mission to Europe during the War of 1812. He had later been Senator, Minister to Russia and Great Britain, and Vice- President of the United States, Pennsylvania's only son to attain that honor. To be sure, he and his friends had not been without hopes for the presidency. During this long career Dallas had conscientiously recorded his experiences. He kept lengthy diaries and wrote countless letters; his neat copperplate handwriting filled thousands of sheets of paper. On his official missions he kept letter books and, together with his diaries, they must have constituted quite a library.
    [Show full text]