DOCSLIB.ORG

Gog and Magog (Ezekiel 38-‐39)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gog and Magog (Ezekiel 38-‐39) Gog and Magog (Ezekiel 38-39) Jeff Randolph November 2011 After foretelling the restoration of Israel (containing shadows of the ultimate restoration in Christ), Ezekiel is told to prophesy against a ruler called Gog. Unlike the other nations he speaks against (Ezek. 25-32, 35), who are fairly well known, the person of Gog from the land of Magog (Ezek. 38:2) remains rather mysterious, and as such has been a source of controversy in teachings pertaining to the “end times,” to which the prophecy in Ezekiel 38-39 is popularly applied. Because of the difficulty of applying this particular prophecy, we will briefly discuss several views on the subject, and perhaps come to a more general “big picture” interpretation while at the same time doing justice to the details in the prophecy. Concerning Millennialism The term millennialism refers to one’s beliefs as they pertain to the concept of the millennium, the period of 1000 years found in Revelation 20. Millennial views are fairly far-reaching, incorporating many different eschatological passages in which we will not have sufficient time to examine for the purposes of this discussion. However, because Revelation 20 and Ezekiel 38-39 both reference Gog and Magog, it is important to give a brief summary of the popular millennial paradigms to better understand how the prophecy is approached. System Summary Pre-millennialism The 1000 years are literal and are preceded by the return of Christ, as (Chiliasm) well as by various prophetic events foretold throughout the Bible Post-millennialism The 1000 years are symbolic of the present reign of Christ, wherein the kingdom of God will gradually triumph over the evil in this world preparing for the return of Christ Amillennialism The 1000 years are symbolic of the present reign of Christ, wherein evil will gradually grow worse and worse in this world until the return of Christ An Approach to Old Testament Prophecy Though some prophecies in the Old Testament are difficult to understand and/or apply to historical events, I believe the New Testament sheds some light on determining when and if an Old Testament prophecy was fulfilled. Jesus said that He came to fulfill the law and prophets, and that “one jot or one tittle will by no means pass away from the law till all is fulfilled” (Matt. 5:17-18). We also read that the law was considered dead, and ready to vanish away in the first century (Eph. 2:15; Col. 2:14; Heb. 8:13). Therefore, the law and prophets must have been fulfilled by the first century. More specifically, it seems the law and prophets were considered fulfilled as they passed away in the collapse of the old covenant order, namely the fall of Jerusalem and the temple (Lk. 21:20-22). If this is the case, then we should not look for the fulfillment of Ezekiel 38-39 (actually 36-48) past the fall of Jerusalem, which occurred in 70 AD. This position harmonizes nicely with statements at the end of the prophecy that seem to imply nearness to the restoration of Israel (39:21ff.). This concept alone should be sufficient to rule out pre-millennialism as a valid interpretative approach. Page 1 of 5 What about Revelation 20? The only other mention of “Gog and Magog” in the entire Bible is found in Revelation 20:8, in which it is revealed that after the millennium, Satan would be released to “deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them to battle, whose number is as the sand of the sea.” Since this occurs after the 1000 years, does this not show that the prophecy in Ezekiel 38-39 is to be fulfilled in our future? No, it does not. Just because Gog and Magog are mentioned in Revelation 20, does not mean they are the same exact Gog and Magog from Ezekiel. The Book of Revelation is loaded with Old Testament figures used as symbols, such as Jezebel (2:20), Sodom (11:8), Egypt (11:8), and Babylon (14:8; 17; 18), none of which refer to their ancient namesakes. There is good reason to view Gog and Magog as being used in the same way. So if the Gog and Magog of Revelation are symbolic, who or what do they symbolize? Specifically, I don’t know, but I do believe the general application is the same as the over-arching point in Ezekiel 38- 39 (which is why the symbolism is used). And that is no matter how big and strong and seemingly indestructible an army Satan can muster toward God’s people, they will never prevail. Different Views There are a variety of different views on this prophecy, all of which have some difficulties in fitting the text exactly. That said, there are four worth noting, some popular, others not so much. They are summarized briefly below: View Summary Dispensational Pre-millennialism Ezekiel 38-39 correlates directly to Revelation 20, and is an “end times” battle that could break out at any moment. Gog is the leader of Russia. Antiochus Epiphanes Ezekiel 38-39 is largely historical and refers primarily to the Jewish triumph over the Syrians in 167 BC. Gog is the leader of Syria at the time, Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Esther Ezekiel 38-39 is largely historical and refers primarily to the events described in the book of Esther. Gog is Haman, “the enemy of the Jews” (Esther 3:10) Symbolic Ezekiel 38-39 is merely a symbol for any and all enemies who come against God’s people, emphasizing that evil will never ultimately prevail. Gog is no one in particular. The Esther View The pre-millennial view should be ruled out based on the New Testament teachings on Old Testament prophecy, as well as the context of restoration from captivity in which we find the prophecy. The symbolic view is certainly beneficial in applying certain aspects of the prophecy to our own lives; however, the context and details seem to require something more specific. For this reason, I believe the Esther view has too many strong points to dismiss, and so the following comments will make correlations with the events of Esther, as well as attempt to pull out the over-arching lesson of the text. Page 2 of 5 An Army of Nations (1-6) Ezekiel is told to prophesy against Gog, of the land of Magog. In many translations, Gog is referred to as “the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal” (38:2). Since “Rosh” cannot be mapped to any ancient land (though Benjamin had a son named Rosh, Gen. 46:21), those holding to the pre-millennial view assume that it is a reference to modern Russia. However, other translations, such as the NIV and ESV, refer to Gog as “the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal,” because the Hebrew word “rosh” actually means “chief” or “head.” In fact, it is translated this way every place else in the Old Testament except in this particular verse. While the name Gog (“mountain”) itself is only mentioned one other place in the Old Testament as a descendent of Reuben (1 Chr. 5:4), the other names of nations listed in Ezekiel 38:1-6 are mentioned multiple times throughout the Old Testament. Magog, Meshech, Tubal, Gomer, and Togarmah are all descendents of Japheth (Gen. 10:2-4; 1 Chr. 1:5-7). Meshech and Tubal are also mentioned a couple times in the book of Ezekiel in connection with the fall of Tyre (Ezek. 27:13) as well as their own judgment (32:26). Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are well known today, and also were well known in ancient times as well (cf. Ezek. 27:10). Gog was to unite the armies across these various nations in attack against Israel (38:10-11). And so the pre-millennial view would attempt to map these ancient names to modern nations and have everyone look to those countries as intending to attack Israel at some point in the near future. Rosh is Russia, Meshech is Moscow, Persia is Iran, Gomer is Germany, etc. With the exception of Persia (Iran), this is little more than finding a modern nation or city that begins with the same letter of the transliterated Hebrew word. The fact is that Gog has been identified by many different nations over the centuries (DeMar, p. 46), none of which have proven accurate. Besides the argument for Old Testament prophetic fulfillment outlined above, the problem with trying to match these ancient lands to modern equivalents leads to the very common practice of “newspaper exegesis” where the latest headlines dictate Biblical meaning. Not only is this an unstable approach, it can cause a great deal of harm when predictions based on these assumptions fail time after time. It weakens the faith of those who buy into it, and pushes non-believers who may not distinguish between different Christian groups even further away. Since all these places (with exception possibly of Rosh) were in existence and well known at the time Ezekiel wrote, perhaps they mean exactly what they say. One of the strengths of the Esther view is that King Ahasuerus is said to have ruled a vast area from India to Ethiopia (Esther 1:1), which would have encompassed all of these places. Haman, being the “chief prince” (Esther 3:1), stands alone as to be described “enemy of the Jews” (Esther 3:10; 8:1; 9:10; 9:24), and in his evil plan, people from all over the empire were going to destroy the Jews (Esther 3; 38:10).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Re-Examination of the Millennium in Rev 20:1–6: Consummation and Recapitulation
    JETS 44/2 (June 2001) 237–51 A RE-EXAMINATION OF THE MILLENNIUM IN REV 20:1–6: CONSUMMATION AND RECAPITULATION dave mathewson* i. introduction The question of the so-called millennial kingdom in Rev 20:1–6 continues to be a source of fascination in evangelical discussion and dialogue.1 The purpose of this article is to re-examine the question of the millennial king- dom as articulated in Rev 20:1–6. More specifically, this article will consider the meaning and function of 20:1–6 within Revelation as it relates to the contemporary debate about whether this section is best understood within a premillennial or amillennial framework. Hermeneutically, most of the de- bate has centered around how literally the reference to the one thousand years in 20:1–6 should be taken and, more importantly, the relationship be- tween 20:1–6 and 19:11–21. Does the thousand year period in 20:1–6 re- fer to a more or less literal period of time?2 Or should it be understood more symbolically? Does 20:1–6 follow 19:11–21 chronologically, with the one thou- sand years featuring a Zwischenreich (premillennialism), or does the final battle in 20:7–10 recapitulate the battle in 19:11–21, with the reference to the one thousand years in 20:1–6 extending all the way back to the first coming of Christ (amillennialism)?3 * Dave Mathewson is instructor in New Testament at Oak Hills Christian College, 1600 Oak Hills Road SW, Bemidji, MN 56601. 1 Cf. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocalyptic Millennialism in the West: the Case of the Solar Temple
    Apocalyptic Millennialism in the West: The Case of the Solar Temple Jean Francois Mayer Ministry of Defense of Switzerland University of Fribourg author of The Solar Temple and other works on emergent religious movements Discussion and Commentary by: • Jeffrey K. Hadden, Professor of Sociology, UVA • David G. Bromley, Professor of Sociology and Religious Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University • James T. Richardson, Professor of Sociology and Judicial Studies, University of Nevada • Gregory Saathoff, M.D. Associate Professor of Clinical Psychiatric Medicine, and Executive Director of the Critical Incident Analysis Group, UVA A presentation held on Friday, November 13, 1998 at The University of Virginia Sponsored by: The Critical Incident Analysis Group at the University of Virginia Department of Sociology, Department of Religious Studies UVA Continuing Education Center for Study of Mind and Human Interaction Apocalyptic Millennialism in the West:The Case of the Solar Temple Copyright © 1998 by the Rector and Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia Critical Incident Analysis Group 1 INTRODUCTION Gregory B. Saathoff, M.D. Executive Director, Critical Incident Analysis Group On November 13, 1998, the University of Virginia was pleased to host an important session that examined many issues surrounding the emergence of Apocalyptic Millenialism in the 1990s. This event was organized by the Critical Incident Analysis Group at the University of Virginia, and co-sponsored by the Departments of Religious Studies and Sociology, and by the Medical School’s Center for the Study of Mind and Human Interaction. As the year 2000 approaches, many groups with apocalyptic, violent, and even suicidal designs are becoming prominent in their preparations for catastrophic, millennial events.
    [Show full text]
  • Millennialism, Rapture and “Left Behind” Literature. Analysing a Major Cultural Phenomenon in Recent Times
    start page: 163 Stellenbosch Theological Journal 2019, Vol 5, No 1, 163–190 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17570/stj.2019.v5n1.a09 Online ISSN 2413-9467 | Print ISSN 2413-9459 2019 © Pieter de Waal Neethling Trust Millennialism, rapture and “Left Behind” literature. Analysing a major cultural phenomenon in recent times De Villers, Pieter GR University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa [email protected] Abstract This article represents a research overview of the nature, historical roots, social contexts and growth of millennialism as a remarkable religious and cultural phenomenon in modern times. It firstly investigates the notions of eschatology, millennialism and rapture that characterize millennialism. It then analyses how and why millennialism that seems to have been a marginal phenomenon, became prominent in the United States through the evangelistic activities of Darby, initially an unknown pastor of a minuscule faith community from England and later a household name in the global religious discourse. It analyses how millennialism grew to play a key role in the religious, social and political discourse of the twentieth century. It finally analyses how Darby’s ideas are illuminated when they are placed within the context of modern England in the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth century. In a conclusion some key challenges of the place and role of millennialism as a movement that reasserts itself continuously, are spelled out in the light of this history. Keywords Eschatology; millennialism; chiliasm; rapture; dispensationalism; J.N. Darby; Joseph Mede; Johann Heinrich Alsted; “Left Behind” literature. 1. Eschatology and millennialism Christianity is essentially an eschatological movement that proclaims the fulfilment of the divine promises in Hebrew Scriptures in the earthly ministry of Christ, but it also harbours the expectation of an ultimate fulfilment of Christ’s second coming with the new world of God that will replace the existing evil dispensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Premillennialism and Hermeneutics * * *
    MSJ 29/2 (Fall 2018) 127–55 PREMILLENNIALISM AND HERMENEUTICS Brad Klassen Associate Professor of Bible Exposition The Master’s Seminary The purpose of this article is to identify the primary hermeneutical issues at the center of the divide over eschatology, while providing a brief premillennial response to each. The first of these issues concerns the legitimacy of literal interpretation with respect to prophetic texts. The second concerns the function of progressive revelation and the relationship of subsequent revelation to antecedent revelation. The third con- cerns the influence of presupposition, particularly as it relates to the analogy of faith and the impact of Platonic dualism on the Christian’s approach to Scripture. * * * * * Introduction Discussions about biblical eschatology—the study of the Bible’s teaching about future things—divide over one pivotal event: the timing of the second coming of Jesus Christ. In particular, disagreement over this central piece in God’s redemptive plan relates to what the apostle John described as a “thousand-year” reign of the Messiah in Revelation 20:1–6.1 Three general positions developed throughout church history. First, the oldest view of the church, premillennialism,2 contends that the second coming of Christ occurs prior to (“pre-”) the millennium described by John.3 In other words, premillennialism teaches that Christ will return in order to establish a physical kingdom on earth as described by a non-figurative interpretation of Revelation 20:1– 1 The phrase “thousand years” (χίλια ἔτη) is repeated six times in Revelation 20:1–7. The term “chiliasm” is derived from the Greek adjective χίλια (chilia, “thousand”).
    [Show full text]
  • Ezekiel's Two Sticks and Eschatological Violence in the Pentecostal Tradition
    EZEKIEL’S TWO STICKS AND ESCHATOLOGICAL VIOLENCE IN THE PENTECOSTAL TRADITION: AN INTERTEXTUAL LITERARY ANALYSIS BY ALICIA R. JACKSON A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF THEOLOGY AND RELIGION COLLEGE OF ARTS AND LAW UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM JANUARY 16, 2018 i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Copyright © Alicia R. Jackson 2018 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This thesis explores the topic of eschatological violence in the Pentecostal tradition through an intertextual literary analysis of Ezekiel 36:16—39:29 and Revelation 19:11—21 and 20:7—10 by investigating primarily how the intentional literary placement of the ‘Two Sticks’ oracle (Ezek 37:15—28) between the ‘Dry Bones’ vision (Ezek 37:1—14) and the ‘Gog of Magog’ war (Ezek 38:1—39:29) informs the reader’s theological understanding of the message of Ezekiel 36:16—39:29 as a whole. Secondarily, this thesis considers how the allusion to Ezek 38—39 in Rev 19:11—21 and 20:7—10 enhances the reader’s theological understanding of Ezek 36:16—39:29, yielding an intertextual reading that challenges the way these texts have long been understood in popular Pentecostal contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unscriptural Theologies of Amillennialism and Postmillennialism
    Scholars Crossing Article Archives Pre-Trib Research Center May 2009 The Unscriptural Theologies of Amillennialism and Postmillennialism Thomas D. Ice Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch Recommended Citation Ice, Thomas D., "The Unscriptural Theologies of Amillennialism and Postmillennialism" (2009). Article Archives. 54. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/54 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pre-Trib Research Center at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Article Archives by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UNSCRIPTURAL THEOLOGIES OF AMILLENNIALISM AND POSTMILLENNIALISM by Thomas Ice The twentieth century has been a time dominated by the outworking of one’s eschatology. In addition to the various eddies and movements within Christianity, just think of the impact that Communism and Islam had on the last hundred years. Both are corrupted forms of a Christian, postmillennial determinism. One’s view of the future has tremendous impact upon what one believes an individual should do in the present. Historically, only the Bible looks ahead to the future as a time when life will be better than in the past. All pagan religions look to the past and think, “If only we could return to the good old days, then that would be wonderful.” “If we could just return the days of the Pharaohs of Egypt.” “If we could bring back the wonderful days of Nebuchadnezzar.” “If we could just get back to the 50s.” Only the Bible says the best is yet to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Millennialism in America: Recent Studies
    MILLENNIALISM IN AMERICA: RECENT STUDIES LEONARD I. SWEET Rochester Center for Theological Studies AMERICAN APOCALYPSE: YANKEE PROTESTANTS AND THE CIVIL WAR, 1860-1869. By James H. Moorhead. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978. Pp. 278. THE LOGIC OF MILLENNIAL THOUGHT: EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY NEW ENGLAND. By James West Davidson. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978. Pp. 308. THE SACRED CAUSE OF LIBERTY: REPUBLICAN THOUGHT AND THE MILLENNIUM IN REVOLUTIONARY NEW ENGLAND. By Na­ than O. Hatch. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978. Pp. 197. THE WORKS OF JONATHAN EDWARDS 5: APOCALYPTIC WRIT­ INGS. Edited by Stephen J. Stein. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1977. Pp. 501. The trouble with the present, it has been said, is that the future isn't what it used to be. Comparison of our centennial and bicentennial celebrations tends to substantiate that claim. On July 4,1876, the Amer­ ican people focused their attention on local patriotic celebrations and on the international Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, where twenty- five per cent of the American population gathered during the Exposition's six-month lifespan to celebrate the marvelous achievements of one hundred years and to examine inventions and ideas designed for improv­ ing life in this "land of the future." On July 4, 1976, the masses of Americans, after having been encouraged to "do your own thing" by the Bicentennial Commission, relaxed on beaches or in backyards, joining other Americans only to watch on TV eighteen tall ships from around the globe sail into New York harbor. Americans flew into the tricentennial on the wings of nostalgia, hedonism, presentism, and pessimism.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to Medieval Cultures of Eschatology
    Veronika Wieser and Vincent Eltschinger Introduction: Approaches to Medieval Cultures of Eschatology 1. Medieval Apocalypticism and Eschatology In all religions, ideas about the past, the present and the future were shaped and made meaningful by beliefs and expectations related to the End Times. Such beliefs in the Last Things, ta eschata, have been integral to Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism, especially in the pre-modern era,1 and range from the fi- nal battle between good and evil and the dawn of a new, divine order to death, di- vine judgment and eternal afterlife. They also include the dreadful tribulations that every human will supposedly have to face before salvation. In the medieval West as in the East,2 eschatology seems to have been part of the foundation upon which so- cieties were built.3 This period is often associated with anticipation of the Second Coming of Christ (parousia) or the advent of messianic figures such as the Hindu 1 This is well exemplified in the range of contributions to Walls, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Escha- tology, comprising articles about Jewish, Christian, Islamic, Buddhist and Hindu eschatology. 2 In spite of various efforts on the part of – mainly – Indian scholars to accommodate the notion of “medieval” to South Asia, its relevance remains highly questionable, as is that of “Indian feudal- ism” and many scholars’ inclination to interpret, mostly for nationalistic reasons, Gupta India as a golden age not unlike Greek and Latin Antiquity. The use of categories such as “(early) medieval (India)”, though very often uncritical, is a matter of convention rather than conviction, and such it should probably remain.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Mormon Millenarianism: Another Look
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1985 Early Mormon Millenarianism: Another Look Grant Underwood Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Underwood, Grant, "Early Mormon Millenarianism: Another Look" (1985). Theses and Dissertations. 5182. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5182 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. EARLYEARELY MORMONMOPJYION millenniallillennialisl1I1 ISM ANOTHER LOOK A thesis presented to the department of history brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts by grant underwood december 98119811 this nesisthesisf I by grant underwood is accepted in its present form by the dpeartment of history of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree of0 E master of arts thomas G arefalexanderAreCandr committee chairman y Z IV V 7 10 14 4 &mrasaemr l&ylayL&yayy forjborteraborterrrororterteryk commijeteecomm VforterborterJBrortertee member 4z2lzai7 datedate7dated iajamesme s B alienallenalren dboartmentdepartment chairman typed by leigh price ajl1jl tablerTABLETABLEJ OF
    [Show full text]
  • The Millennial Position of Spurgeon
    TMSJ 7/2 (Fall 1996) 183-212 THE MILLENNIAL POSITION OF SPURGEON Dennis M. Swanson Seminary Librarian The notoriety of Charles Haddon Spurgeon has caused many since his time to claim him as a supporter of their individual views regarding the millennium. Spurgeon and his contemporaries were familiar with the four current millennial views—amillennialism, postmillennialism, historic premillennialism, and dispensational premillennialism—though the earlier nomenclature may have differed. Spurgeon did not preach or write extensively on prophetic themes, but in his sermons and writings he did say enough to produce a clear picture of his position. Despite claims to the contrary, his position was most closely identifiable with that of historic premillennialism in teaching the church would experience the tribulation, the millennial kingdom would be the culmination of God's program for the church, a thousand years would separate the resurrection of the just from that of the unjust, and the Jews in the kingdom would be part of the one people of God with the church. * * * * * In the last hundred years eschatology has probably been the subject of more writings than any other aspect of systematic theology. Charles Haddon Spurgeon (1834-92) did not specialize in eschatology, but supporters of almost every eschatological position have appealed to him as an authority to support their views. Given Spurgeon's notoriety, the volume of his writings, and his theological acumen, those appeals are not surprising. A sampling of conclusions will illustrate this point. Lewis A. Drummond states, "Spurgeon confessed to be a pre-millennialist."1 Peter Masters, current 1Lewis A. Drummond, Spurgeon: Prince of Preachers (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1993) 650.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangerous Role of Politics in Modern Millennial Movements
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 8 Original Research The dangerous role of politics in modern millennial movements Author: This article investigates the political nature and involvement of millennialism as a religious 1 Pieter G.R. de Villiers phenomenon. It, firstly, offers a brief analysis of how millennialism shifted from a significant, Affiliation: but marginal role player in the history of Christianity to become part of the mainstream 1Department of New religious discourse in recent times. It then seeks to explain how this came about by analysing Testament, Faculty of the way this development continues and resonates with the political language and thought of Theology and Religion, the 19th-century religious discourse in the United States and in early modern England since University of the Free State, the 16th century. It finally investigates the dangerous consequences of politicising eschatology Bloemfontein, South Africa by specifically analysing the role of Israel in millennial expectations. Corresponding author: Keywords: Pieter G.R. de Villiers, millennium; millennialism; millenarianism; chiliasm; left-behind literature. [email protected] Dates: From apolitical to political millennialism1 Received: 23 June 2019 Accepted: 15 Aug. 2019 Millennialism was a major trend in the Jewish and Christian discourse in Western Europe and Published: 14 Nov. 2019 North America towards the end of the 20th century.2 It had an extraordinary interest in eschatological motifs like the thousand-year reign of peace, introduced by the rapture of the How to cite this article: saints, Armageddon as the last war of the Antichrist between good and evil, the last judgement De Villiers, P.G.R., 2019, ‘The dangerous role of and the final eradication of evil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rapture – Amillennialism, Postmillennialism Or
    The Rapture Amillennialism, Postmillennialism, or Premillennialism? The rapture is one of those often talked about and often misunderstood points of theology within Christian circles. This is written to shine a little bit of light on some of the common beliefs regarding the End Times. This is clearly not an exhaustive work on the subject, nor is it meant to be. Please take time on your own to study Scripture and determine for yourself what you believe. To kick us off, there are some who are known as Amillennialists who do not believe in a Christ who will set up rule on this earth. For them, Christ simply comes, judges, and establishes the new heaven and earth. For them there is no rapture. Catholics and some Protestants are Amillennialists. Then there are the Postmillennialists who believe that the world, through the preaching and teaching of the church, will become more godly, peaceful, and prosperous and that the new age will be essentially like the present with the church ruling for a period of time. At the end Christ returns and judges the world. The post-millennialists also have no place for a rapture. Presbyterians and some Baptists are traditionally post- millennialists. Finally, there are Premillennialists. This was the view of the earliest church, as we know from Justin Martyr and Papias, and other early writers. It is also the view of many evangelicals, including many Baptists and most people in the Evangelical church today. Among the pre-millennialists, there are four basic views of the rapture. There are the Pre-Tribulation rapture proponents.
    [Show full text]