Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel Originally built by Amenhotep I - 1525 BCE to 1504 BCE (Show in timemap) Destroyed by: Amenhotep III - 1390 BCE to 1352 BCE ( (Show in timemap)) Other works initiated by Amenhotep I: Middle Kingdom Court, Amenhotep I Calcite Chapel Other works destroyed by Amenhotep III: Thutmose IV Peristyle Hall, Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, White Chapel, Amenhotep II Shrine, Pylon and Fes- tival Court of Thutmose II Other shrines: Amenhotep I Calcite Chapel, Amenhotep II Shrine, Contra Tem- ple, Osiris Catacombs, Osiris Coptite, Osiris Heqa-Djet, Palace of Ma’at, Central Bark Shrine, Ramesses II Eastern Temple, Ramesses III Temple, Red Chapel, Sety II Shrine, Taharqo Kiosk, Thutmose III Shrine, White Chapel, Edifice of Amenhotep II, Chapel of Hakoris, Station of the King and Corridor Introduction The limestone chapel of Amenhotep I was a replica of the “white chapel” of Middle Kingdom king Senusret I. The chapel was almost identical in size and design to the earlier “white chapel.” Both may originally have stood to the west of the temple precinct. Measurements: Each of the columns measure 2.56m in height and are approxi- mately 0.6m across and 0.6m deep. The platform on which the columns rest is 1.18m high and 6.80m by 6.45m. Phase: Amenhotep I The chapel may have served as a statue shrine or portable bark shrine for the image of Amun-Ra or the king. The chapel seems to have remained standing long enough to be incorporated into the “festival hall” of king Thutmose II. Construction materials: limestone Renderings of the Limestone Chapel as completed during the reign of Amenhotep I. Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel Destruction: Amenhotep III When Amenhotep III decided to construct the third pylon, he dismantled all the chapels within the “festival court” of Thutmose II. Amenhotep’s limestone chapel was used as building fill within the new pylon. About the reconstruction model of this phase Image resource: Rendering of Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel, by UCLA Image resource: Rendering of Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel, by UCLA Because the chapel of Amenhotep I was a copy of the Middle Kingdom Senusret I “white chapel,” the dimensions of the “white chapel” were used to create a model of the Amenhotep chapel. A plain limestone pattern was used to recreate the chapel’s stone color. Bibliography and Sources Used for Model Construction Graindorge, Catherine (2002), “Der Tempel des Amun-Re von Karnak zu Beginn der 18.Dynastie,” in Ägyptologische Tempeltagung : Würzburg, 23.-26. Septem- ber 1999, vol. 5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 83-90. © 2008 All rights reserved. Sullivan 2008, Amenhotep I Limestone Chapel. Digital Karnak. 2 Regents of the University of California..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Karnak Project Sébastien Biston-Moulin, Christophe Thiers
The Karnak Project Sébastien Biston-Moulin, Christophe Thiers To cite this version: Sébastien Biston-Moulin, Christophe Thiers. The Karnak Project: A Comprehensive Edition of the Largest Ancient Egyptian Temple. Annamaria De Santis (Université de Pise); Irene Rossi (CNR - ISMA). Crossing Experiences in Digital Epigraphy. From Practice to Discipline, De Gruyter Open, pp.155-164, 2018, 9783110607208. 10.1515/9783110607208-013. halshs-02056329 HAL Id: halshs-02056329 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02056329 Submitted on 4 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Annamaria De Santis and Irene Rossi (Eds.) Crossing Experiences in Digital Epigraphy From Practice to Discipline Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editors: Francesca Corazza and Łukasz Połczyński Language Editor: Rebecca Crozier ISBN 978-3-11-060719-2 e-ISBN 978-3-11-060720-8 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 © 2018 Annamaria De Santis, Irene Rossi and chapters’ contributors Published by De Gruyter Poland Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com.
[Show full text]
A Nome Procession from the Royal Cult Complex in the Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir El-Bahari 20 O B
INSTITUT DES CULTURES MÉDITERRANÉENNES ET ORIENTALES DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXVII 2014 O B A Nome Procession from the Royal Cult Complex in the Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari 20 O B The term ‘nome procession’ refers to an iconographic sequence of nome personifi cations depicted mostly on the lowest level of temples or shrines. The fi gures are usually represented in a procession around the edifi ce, bringing offerings for the cult of the deity or the king worshiped inside. They follow the geographic order from south to north, in line with the traditional Egyptian system of orientation which gives precedence to the southern direction.1 The present study deals with one such procession of nome personifi cations represented in the Temple of Queen Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari. The scene in question covers the eastern wall of a small, open courtyard in the Complex of the Royal Cult situated south of the main Upper Courtyard of the Temple. The small court precedes two vestibules which further lead to adjacent two cult chapels. The bigger vestibule, belonging to the Chapel of Hatshepsut, is attached to the southern side of the courtyard, whereas on the western side of the latter lie the second, much smaller vestibule and a cult chapel dedicated to the Queen’s father, Tuthmosis I. From the architectural point of view, the eastern wall of the small courtyard partly delimits the Royal Cult Complex from the east. Iconographically, the whole eastern wall of the Complex is divided into two sections, each one belonging to a different piece of this cultic compound: the northern part, decorated in sunken relief, stretches for 3.71m (which equals 7 cubits) and belongs to the said small courtyard; the southern section – 5.81m long (approx.
[Show full text]
ANTHRO 138TS: ARCHAEOLOGY of EGYPT FINAL STUDY GUIDE Œ Ñ Ú, Etc
ANTHRO 138TS: ARCHAEOLOGY OF EGYPT F I N A L S T U D Y G U I D E Short Answer Identifications: Some of these ID’s overlap with the mid- term – emphasize the 2nd half of class. 4 bulleted points for each. Anubis Edfu Sympathetic Magic Ba-Ka-Akh Elephantine Deben Merwer John Wilson Canopic Jars “White Chapel” Bes Wilbour Papyrus (peripteral shrine) Defuffa Sed Festival Ennead Napata Mummification Odgoad Medamud Hellenism/Hellenistic Syncretism Kahun Hor-Apollo Ushabti Mastaba Karl Polanyi Elephantine Serdab Ostraca Harim Conspiracy T-Shaped Tomb Paneb Min/Min-Amun/Min- Letter to the Dead George Reisner Horus Book of the Dead Neo-Platonic Philosophy Sympathetic Magic Am Duat Per-aa Formalist-Substantivist Meketre Palermo Stone Shuty Apademak Semna Despatches Deir el-Medina Amanatore Ramesseum Temple of Satet Hekanakht Taweret Picture Identifications: The following list refers to images from the Silverman text. One bulleted point for each. Rahotep & Nofret Taharqa Opening of Mouth Sennedjem Bastet Ba Ka-aper Antinous Execration Figure Khamuas Sat-Hathor-Iunet Mutemonet Canon of Proportion Selqet Sobek Bes Hathor Scarab Taweret Thoth Horus Buhen Ramose Rameses II – Ra-mes-su Mastaba Meresankh Wedjat (Eye of Horus) Thuya Hunefer Œ Ñ ú, etc. ANTHRO 138TS: ARCHAEOLOGY OF EGYPT Essays: There will be two essays, one from the Final Study Guide and a comprehensive essay question on a large theme from both halves of class. For all of the essays you will have a choice between two questions to answer. S T U D Y Q U E S T I O N S 1.
[Show full text]
Ancient Israel in Sinai: the Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition
Ancient Israel in Sinai: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition JAMES K. HOFFMEIER OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Ancient Israel in Sinai This page intentionally left blank Ancient Israel in Sinai The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition james k. hoffmeier 1 2005 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With ofﬁces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright # 2005 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hoffmeier, James Karl, 1951– Ancient Israel in Sinai : the evidence for the authenticity of the wilderness tradition / James K. Hoffmeier. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13 978-0-19-515546-4 ISBN 0-19-515546-7 1. Bible. O.T. Exodus XVI–Numbers XX—Criticism, interpretation, etc. 2. Bible. O.T. Exodus XVI–Numbers XX—Evidences, authority, etc. 3. Bible. O.T. Exodus XVI–Numbers XX—History of biblical events.
[Show full text]
Pharaonic Egypt and the Ara Pacis in Augustan Rome
Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics Pharaonic Egypt and the Ara Pacis in Augustan Rome Version 2.0 September 2007 Jennifer Trimble Stanford University Abstract: This paper explores processes of cultural appropriation, and specifically Augustan visual receptions of pharaonic Egypt. As a test case, I consider the possibility of Egyptianizing precedents for the Ara Pacis, including the architecture of Middle and New Kingdom jubilee chapels. This requires looking at the Augustan interventions into the traditional temple complexes of Egypt, the transmission of imperial ideas about pharaonic Egypt to Rome, their uses there, and the role of pharaonic appropriations within a broader landscape of Aegyptiaca in Rome. © Jennifer Trimble. [email protected] 2 1. Appropriations1 The Ara Pacis Augustae is the product of a modern appropriation (fig. 1). Fragments were known from the sixteenth century and there was serious interest in the nineteenth, but the decisive intervention came under Mussolini in 1937-38, when the majority of the altar was excavated under the direction of Giuseppe Moretti in a spectacular feat of engineering that included freezing the groundwater at the site.2 The subsequent reconstruction presented a monument that was compellingly whole. Within a new pavilion designed for it by Vittorio Ballio Morpurgo, it could be visited and walked around, and its program and sculpture studied in detail. This splendid presence was coupled with a striking absence. The monument had been removed from its original location in the southern Campus Martius and was now reconstructed as the fourth side of the Piazzale Augusto Imperatore, the other three sides consisting of new buildings framing Augustus’ Mausoleum (fig.
[Show full text]
Chicago House Bulletin IV, No.1
oi.uchicago.edu CHICAGO HOUSE Volume IV, No.1 December 30, 1992 BULLETIN Privately_ circulated Issued by The Epigraphic Survey of The Oriental Institute of The University of Chicago CURRENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRAVELS IN THE DESERT: THE WORK IN LUXOR THEBAN ESCARPMENT By Ray Johnson, Senior Artist By Debbie Darnell, Epigrapher The winter is always a busy time for archaeology in Temporarily on duty in India in 1928. desert explorer Luxor. and this season is no exception. The Epigraphic Survey Ralph Bagnold longed for "what Egypt alone could give. the alone is involved in two separate projects on both sides of the knowledge that the unknown lay at one's very door. that it was river. both in full swing as this article is being written. On the within one's power at any time to step right off the map" east bank. at Luxor Temple. drawings are being readied for (Libyan Sands. London. 1935. p. 137). Could the same be said Volume Two of the new Survey series. Reliefs and Inscriptions of Egypt today. more than six decades later. after years of at Luxor Temple. and photographer Cecile Keefe continues to intensive archaeological investigation of sites ranging from the photograph decorated stone fragments from the upper regis Delta to Nubia. from the oases to the Red Sea. when so many ters for Volume Three. At the same time. on the west bank. our monuments are paved and tidied and wholly accessible to the team is documenting the reliefs of Hatshepsut and Thutmosis hordes of tourists that flood the country every year? Happily III in the painted chapels and ambulatory of the bark sanctuary for those with a passion for exploration.
[Show full text]
Abdou A.O.D. El-Derby •••
ـــــــــــــــــــــ ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺘﺤﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻡ ﻝﻶﺜﺎﺭﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﺭﺏ ( )١٣ The Reconstruction of Ancient Egyptian Buildings and Site's Remains and Ruins The Justifications and an Overview of Some Practices Dr. Abdou A.O.D. El-Derby ••• Abstract The reconstruction of archaeological remains and ruins of buildings and sites is a dilemma and a controversial theme among specialists, but the predominant and widespread the conservative view the reversible minimum interventions which is against reconstruction . this paper exhibits this current approach and confounds it with the warrants or justifications for buildings and sites reconstruction 's remains and ruins particularly ancient Egyptian ones which have some particular conditions , and with exhibition to the general criteria for reconstruction, holding the pass with an overview of some proverbial reconstruction practices of ancient Egyptian buildings (the temple of Hatshepsut at el-Deir el- Bahari, the white chapel of Senusret I , the Egyptian Alabaster Chapel of Amenhotep I and the Red Chapel of Hatshepsut at Karnak . • ••Associate professor of Archaeology Conservation ,Chairman of Archaeology Conservation Depart. , Faculty of Archaeology , South Valley University , Qena , Egypt - 13 - ـــــــــــــــــــــ ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺘﺤﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻡ ﻝﻶﺜﺎﺭﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﺭﺏ ( )١٣ 1. Introduction The reconstruction ( 1) of historic and archaeological remains and ruins of buildings and sites is a dilemma which has long been a controversial subject among professional in archaeology conservators especially for those interesting in the material
[Show full text]
The Ostracon Is Published Two Or Three Times a Year by Members of the Egyptian Study Society. the ESS Is a Non-Profit Organizati
VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2; SUMMER-2004 PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Robert Bigelow Dena Newkirk Patricia Cavenee Maryanne Patterson Susan Cottman Frank Pettee Richard Harwood Mary Pratchett Anita McHugh Jan Stremme ESS STAFF LIAISON Carol Cochran The Ostracon is published two or three times a year by members of the Egyptian Study Society. The ESS is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to study ancient Egypt and it is a cooperating organization with the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. Articles are contributed by members and scholars on a voluntary basis. Member participation is en- couraged. Nothing may be reprinted in whole or part without written permission of the author. For submission guidelines, see the ESS Web site at www.EgyptStudy.org or e-mail the Editor at [email protected]. IN THIS SPECIAL ISSUE ON THUTMOSIS III ... The opinions expressed in The Ostracon do not necessarily represent the views of the Publications Committee, the Egyptian Study Society, or the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. ©2004 Egyptian Study Society Publication of this issue of The Ostracon is supported by generous gifts from BONNIE SAMPSELL AND THE THEBAN TEMPLES OF TUTHMOSIS III 16 THE PETTY FOUNDATION Bonnie M. Sampsell Egyptian Study Society, Inc. P.O. Box 40754 Denver, Colorado 80204-0754 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Theban Temples of Tuthmosis III by Bonnie M. Sampsell emple ruins are among the most familiar and inspir- a record of his campaigns and the spoils he obtained on the walls ing remains of the ancient Egyptian civilization. While
[Show full text]
Case Study 8.2: the Temple of Amun at Karnak, Egypt
Case Study 8.2: The Temple of Amun at Karnak, Egypt Presentation and analysis of the site Geographical position: The temple of Karnak is located in the northern sector of the city of Luxor, province of Qena, Egypt. Location: Latitude 25º 43´ 5˝ N, longitude 32º 36´ 45˝ E. Elevation 80m above mean sea level. General description: The site is a huge complex comprising no fewer than ten temples, surrounded by a huge temenos wall. The largest and most conspicuous of the temples is that of the god Amun-Re, the most important divinity of the ancient Egyptians from the 12th Dynasty to the Ptolemaic Period and even later. Inventory of the remains : The most important temples in relation to astronomy are the temple of Amun itself, the temple of Ra-Horakhty, the temple of Amun-who-hear-the-Prayers, the High-room of the Sun and the temples of Khonsu and Ptah, with their pylons, obelisks, courts, halls and inner chambers. The site includes an open-air museum containing the reconstructed White Chapel of Senuseret I and Red Chapel of Hatshepsut (not on their original sites), as well as some isolated fragments of festival lists dating to earliest periods of the temple. The wall decoration of temples and chapels includes many representations of the stretching of the cord ceremony. History of the site: The first archaeological remains on the site of Karnak are dated to the 11th Dynasty (reign of Intef II, c. 2050 BC). The first temple was erected by Senuseret I a few decades later and the sanctuary was successively enlarged by several kings from the New Kingdom onwards.
[Show full text]
The Montu Precinct at North-Karnak '' in KA Bard Éd. Encyclopedia of The
“ The Montu Precinct at North-Karnak ” in K.A. Bard éd. Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt Luc Gabolde, Vincent Rondot To cite this version: Luc Gabolde, Vincent Rondot. “ The Montu Precinct at North-Karnak ” in K.A. Bard éd. Encyclo- pedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt. Encyclopedia of the Archaelogy of Ancient Egypt (K.A. Bard éd.), 1999. hal-01895027 HAL Id: hal-01895027 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01895027 Submitted on 15 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt Compiled and edited by Kathryn A.Bard with the editing assistance of Steven Blake Shubert London and New York Entries A-Z 473 and feasting show those officials being honored squatting before the façade of the palace, with a head-smiting scene in the background. This can only be the large relief of Akhenaten which decorated the reveals of the gate of Pylon III at Karnak, and lay just south of the royal palace. Whether a large colonnade decorated with figures of Nefertiti once stood on the site of the present Pylon II must remain moot; it remains a possibility that some parts of the Amen temple remained in operation, at least until the celebration of the jubilee.
[Show full text]
A Reconstruction of Senwosret I's Portico And
senwosret i’s portico and of some structures of amenhotep i at karnak 137 A RECONSTRUCTION OF SENWOSRET I’S PORTICO AND OF SOME STRUCTURES OF AMENHOTEP I AT KARNAK François Larché CNRS Outline The four granite thresholds The slicing of the radier’s west side 1. Senwosret’s Limestone Portico The channel embedded beneath the radier’s 1.1. The Limestone Radier is too Short West- top face ward to Place Senwosret I’s Portico The hypothetical plan of the walls built on The north-west corner block of theradier the radier The slicing of the radier’s west edge The reused blocks inside theradier 1.2. The Original Decoration on the South The blocks found scattered on the radier Outer Face of the Hatshepsut Suite The particular case of the calcite socle with 1.3. The Hypothetical Superimposition of Two steps in Senwosret I’s name Similar Scenes with Different Proportions 3.2. The Brick Structures Predating the Lime- 1.4. The Change in Direction of Senwosret I’s stone Radier Portico Around the radier The new placement of the Osirian pillar Below the radier n°11 Below the 6th Pylon’s courtyards The new placement of the Osirian pillar Conclusions n°15 3.3. The Platform Built into the Limestone Eastward orientation like the contra temple Radier of Tuthmosis III Its elevation Placement of the portico Its pebble foundations 1.5. The Existence of a Double Portico The low mud brick wall encasing the pebble 1.6. The Date and Reason for the Dismantling fill of Senwosret I’s Portico 3.4.
[Show full text]
Dstretch® and Egyptian Tomb Paintings: a Case Study from Beni Hassan T ⁎ Linda Evans , Anna-Latifa Mourad
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 18 (2018) 78–84 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep DStretch® and Egyptian tomb paintings: A case study from Beni Hassan T ⁎ Linda Evans , Anna-Latifa Mourad Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The advantage of using DStretch® – image enhancement software developed for rock art research – for the Egyptology analysis and recording of ancient Egyptian wall paintings is demonstrated via its recent application at the Egyptian art cemetery site of Beni Hassan. DStretch® enhanced photographs of painted surfaces enable obscure or faded Epigraphy details to be viewed by artificially highlighting traces of remaining pigment. Trial use of DStretch® for the Wall paintings examination of wall paintings at Beni Hassan has revealed or confirmed new images of pigs and bats (animals Animal imagery that are rarely attested in Egyptian art), and a highly unusual depiction of a vulture, exposing features that were otherwise unavailable visually. When used in conjunction with digital epigraphy, DStretch® offers an invaluable tool for achieving a more complete record of Egypt's artistic legacy. 1. Introduction differentiate painted or carved lines and textures, and to make informed decisions about what can be seen. Egyptology training plays an im- Digital epigraphy has been a boon to archaeological practice in portant role in the latter, however the
[Show full text]