Tangling with Longnose

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tangling with Longnose What this living fossil lacks in game appeal, it makes up for with tenacity and an astonishing natural history. Gar Tangling With Longnose By Michael A. Kallok 2 Photography by TomMinnesota Conservation Volunteer Thulen July–August 2011 3 The diamond-shaped, razor- catch. He also holds the current Backwater Maze sharp, and enamel-hard scales of state record for a type of sucker We arrive at Verchota Landing gar were once used to tip arrows. known as golden redhorse. near Minnesota City just after 9 No hook required: Flies made A good map like the Geving’s curiosity about a.m. with a 16-foot fishing boat of frayed nylon rope tangle in the one found in the Minnesota’s native fish was in tow. Waiting for us is Heath teeth of longnose gar. DNR’s Mississippi first inspired by family trips Sershen, technology manager Removing a tangled rope fly River guide is to St. Croix State Park. There, for the National Eagle Center in requires a good pair of pliers. essential for navi- with hook, line, sinker, and Wabasha and self-described for- gating the river’s humble nightcrawler, he mer trout snob. He still enjoys maze of backwaters. and his brother Corey (the fishing for trout, but it’s clear Geving displays a 40-inch other half of roughfish.com) that Sershen now avidly pursues longnose gar caught from Pool 5a discovered a diverse world other species as he relates a story of the Mississippi. swimming beneath the river’s about arecent battle with abow- surface. Like birders keeping fin. Like gar, the bowfin is a ray- Between61 Red Wing doesn’t andstray far from the thick blue line of the Mississippi. Precipitous lime- La Crescent,stone outcrops U.S. Highshoulder- the river’s broad floodplain. Ordi- narily I’d be looking for a ten- way dril of blacktop west into the deeply furrowed landscape of the driftless area, where trout swim in coldwater streams. Verchota Landing near Minnesota But today will be anything City provides access to Pool 5a. but ordinary. a lifelist of their sightings, the finned relic of the Cretaceous. Pool 5a, like the rest of I’m on my way to Pool 5a of Gevings and their cadre of so- Sershen is on his way to Mississippi River below A heavy 8 to 10 weight flyrod is the Mississippi River in hopes of called “roughfish” enthusiasts Pool 8 in search of shovel- St. Anthony Falls, is home useful for casting bulky rope flies. catching aliving fossil of the Cre- believe part of angling’s ap- nose sturgeon today, but he’s to a remarkably diverse taceous Period—longnose gar. peal is landing species they’ve stopped by to refresh Geving’s assembly of fish. A typical While a simple chunk of frayed With me is Andrew Geving—an never caught before. memory on how to safely nav- sampling by DNR fisheries rope might suffice, these rope flies are ardent proponent of the simple After lucking into a school igate to the gar spot, which he’s can turn up as many as 60 embellished with fish-attracting flash. pleasure of angling regardless of shortnose gar the previous labeled “the snag” on the map different species, includ- The gar’s bony beak is 15 to 20 of species and co-founder of summer, I’m looking to add he leaves with us. ing baitfish. times as long as it is wide. roughfish.com, a website devot- longnose gar to my own lifelist. Sershen bids us luck, and ed to fish most anglers try not to Geving has agreed to help me. we part ways. With our gear Gar impale prey with their sharp teeth before turning it sideways in 4 their slender beak to swallow it. Minnesota Conservation Volunteer July–August 2011 5 secured and boat launched, we motor out of the sluggish water near the access to a small Catching gar with rope flies is a neat challenge for fly- channel and head upstream. fishing enthusiasts, but a lively sucker minnow, small This isn’t the main channel of hook, and slip bobber is also an effective way to catch the river where pleasure boats shortnose and longnose gar. cruise and tugs push cargo- laden barges. We’re picking our way through the braided back- waters of the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife & Fish Refuge. There are no naviga- tional aids here, so we rely on a depth finder as we motor cau- tiously through a maze of chan- nels that weave between and around islands. Along the way, we pass a handful of anglers. They are likely fishing for bass, walleye, or panfish—all evo- lutionary newbies compared with gar, which have existed for 100 million years. Asteroid Survivor During the Late Cretaceous, gar swam with guitarfish, sharks, paratarpon, and a host of other fish that either no longer ex- ist or no longer inhabit fresh- water. Tyrannosaurus rex and Triceratops roamed the land, and pterodactyls flew overhead. But, in the plodding context of geological time, nearly half of earth’s species were on the cusp of mass extinction. Sixty-six million years ago, an asteroid 10 kilometers in diame- ter slammed into what is now the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico, July–August 2011 7 Eocene Gar on Display Pellentesque eu nulla lectus, a faci- lisis sapien. Pellentesque rutrum lacus vitae tellus lacinia quis auctor purus mattis. Vivamus id dui arcu. Cras vel ornare enim ectus, a facili- sis sapien. Pellentesque rutrum lacus vitae tellus lacinia quis auctor purus mattis. Vivamus id dui arcu. Cras vel ornare enimectus, a facilisis sapien. Pellentesque rutrum lacus vitae tel- lus lacinia quis auctor purus mattis. Vivamus id dui arcu. Cras vel ornare enim Vivamus id dui arcu. After untangling according to University of North of Upper Cretaceous and Low- from a distance. They aren’t ris- the rope fly, this gar Dakota paleontologist Joseph er Paleogene rock, says fossil- ing to the surface to feed; rather was released. An Hartman. The impact of the as- ized gar scales are among the they are coming up for gulps of armor coat, makes teroid sent amassive cloud of hot most common finds through- atmospheric oxygen. The ability Geving (above) gar difficult to clean, debris into space, and chunks re- out the formation. In other to breathe air allows gar to sur- says figuring out but many anglers, entering the atmosphere ignited words, the fossil record shows vive in very warm, oxygen-de- how to catch a especially in south- a planetary firestorm. gar didn’t merely survive: They pleted water. This trait was likely species he’s never ern states, hold gar “Life would have been a continued to thrive. an advantage for gar as they en- caught before meat in high esteem. blazing hell for a few weeks,” dured the apocalyptic conditions provides him with a While gar flesh is says Hartman. First Encounter that wiped out the dinosaurs at different perspective edible, gar eggs are Animals that couldn’t burrow Cumulous puffs drift lazily be- the end of the Cretaceous. on fish and the reportedly poisonous or find refuge in the water were neath wispy cirrus clouds on The reason they are still water they inhabit. to humans and other likely wiped out. A period of what’s going to be a hot July day. here can be attributed to the But Geving is also mammals. Little is cold due to the sunlight-block- Geving recognizes adistinct tan- relatively unique north–south amazed by the fish- known about the ing cloud of dust and smoke is gle of roots that once nourished direction of the Mississippi catching insight toxin or what evolu- thought to have followed this a massive cottonwood tree pro- River, according to Dan Diet- and ingenuity of tionary advantage it global inferno, says Hartman. jecting from the river’s surface, erman, DNR fisheries biolo- the hundreds of may have provided Clues to life on Earth before and we nudge the boat into shal- gist in Lake City. Globally, not other anglers who considering that fish and after the catastrophic end low water on the opposite shore. many rivers have a longitudinal regularly share preying on gar eggs of the Cretaceous can be found “They’re h e re ,” he says, point- orientation, says Dieterman. their knowledge are unaffected by in Montana and North Dakota ing back across the channel to a The significance, he explains, is and experiences on the toxin. in a group of rock exposures slick of water behind the snag. that gar and other survivors of roughfish.com. known as the Hell Creek For- With the outboard silenced, the Cretaceous, such as bowfin, mation. Hartman, who has ex- we can hear the splashy porpois- sturgeon, and paddlefish, could tensively studied this division es of the gar as we watch them migrate up and down the Pa- 8 Minnesota Conservation Volunteer July–August 2011 9 through—just their fascinat- first. The conventional fish- our flies along that edge and let ing natural history—I think ing method calls for a bobber, them sink before beginning our Though this gar more people would start see- sinker, small hook, minnow, retrieves. I make a cast and let measured 40 inches ing these fish as worthy of and the patience to wait until the fly descend as the current long, it weighed less pursuit and reflection.” the gar has swallowed the bait pulls my line into a gentle arc. than 8 pounds. But far enough to hook the soft When the slack disappears, what gar lack in girth, Toothy Tricks skin at the back of its mouth.
Recommended publications
  • Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus Elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications Summer 2020 Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River Dakota S. Radford Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Radford, Dakota S., "Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River" (2020). Masters Theses. 4806. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4806 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AGING TECHNIQUES & POPULATION DYNAMICS OF BLUE SUCKERS (CYCLEPTUS ELONGATUS) IN THE LOWER WABASH RIVER By Dakota S. Radford B.S. Environmental Biology Eastern Illinois University A thesis prepared for the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biological Sciences Eastern Illinois University May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Thesis abstract .................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Gar (Lepisosteidae)
    Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Animal Information Series Gar (Lepisosteidae) Gar species found in Indiana waters: -Longnose Gar (Lepisosteus osseus) -Shortnose Gar (Lepisosteus platostomus) -Spotted Gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) -Alligator Gar* (Atractosteus spatula) *Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) Alligator gar were extirpated in many states due to habitat destruction, but now they have been reintroduced to their old native habitat in the states of Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Because they have been stocked into the Ohio River, there is a possibility that alligator gar are either already in Indiana or will be found here in the future. Alligator gar are one of the largest freshwater fishes of North America and can reach up to 10 feet long and weigh 300 pounds. Alligator gar are passive, solitary fishes that live in large rivers, swamps, bayous, and lakes. They have a short, wide snout and a double row of teeth on the upper jaw. They are ambush predators that eat mainly fish but have also been seen to eat waterfowl. They are not, however, harmful to humans, as they will only attack an animal that they can swallow whole. Photo Credit: Duane Raver, USFWS Other Names -garpike, billy gar -Shortnose gar: shortbill gar, stubnose gar -Longnose gar: needlenose gar, billfish Why are they called gar? The Anglo-Saxon word gar means spear, which describes the fishes’ long spear-like appearance. The genus name Lepisosteus contains the Greek words lepis which means “scale” and osteon which means “bone.” What do they look like? Gar are slender, cylindrical fishes with hard, diamond-shaped and non-overlapping scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of Three State Records for Spotted Gar in Oklahoma Richard A
    41 Examination of Three State Records for Spotted Gar in Oklahoma Richard A. Snow Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Oklahoma Fishery Research Laboratory, Norman, OK 73072 Michael J. Porta Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Oklahoma Fishery Research Laboratory, Norman, OK 73072 Abstract: Spotted Gar are found throughout Oklahoma and managed as a non-game species. This designation allows the species to be recreationally harvested using any legal methods. We examined three-state record (unrestricted division; harvested by bowfishing) Spotted Gars to estimate age, back calculate length-at-age (growth rates), and identify sex and stomach contents. Spotted Gars age estimates ranged from 32-43 years old. Back-calculated length-at-age displayed similar growth among the three specimens. All Spotted Gar examined were females, and contained no stomach contents. Although this study is limited in scope to the largest of Oklahoma specimens, it improves our knowledge of an understudied species in Oklahoma. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Introduction 2016), several U.S. states (Kansas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania), and are thought to be extirpated in New Mexico (NatureServe 2019). The Spotted Gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) is one of four species of Lepisosteidae found in In Oklahoma, Spotted Gar are managed by the Oklahoma (Miller and Robison 2004, Frenette Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation and Snow 2016). Lepisosteidae represents an (ODWC) as a non-game fish (allowing harvest by ancient lineage of fishes that are widespread any legal method) and currently no regulations in central and eastern North America and protect this species (bag or size regulations), but throughout Central America (Echelle and Grande populations are considered stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish I.D. Guide
    mississippi department of wildlife, fisheries, and parks FRESHWATER FISHES COMMON TO MISSISSIPPI a fish identification guide MDWFP • 1505 EASTOVER DRIVE • JACKSON, MS 39211 • WWW.MDWFP.COM Table of Contents Contents Page Number • White Crappie . 4 • Black Crappie. 5 • Magnolia Crappie . 6 • Largemouth Bass. 7 • Spotted Bass . 8 • Smallmouth Bass. 9 • Redear. 10 • Bluegill . 11 • Warmouth . 12 • Green sunfish. 13 • Longear sunfish . 14 • White Bass . 15 • Striped Bass. 16 • Hybrid Striped Bass . 17 • Yellow Bass. 18 • Walleye . 19 • Pickerel . 20 • Channel Catfish . 21 • Blue Catfish. 22 • Flathead Catfish . 23 • Black Bullhead. 24 • Yellow Bullhead . 25 • Shortnose Gar . 26 • Spotted Gar. 27 • Longnose Gar . 28 • Alligator Gar. 29 • Paddlefish. 30 • Bowfin. 31 • Freshwater Drum . 32 • Common Carp. 33 • Bigmouth Buffalo . 34 • Smallmouth Buffalo. 35 • Gizzard Shad. 36 • Threadfin Shad. 37 • Shovelnose Sturgeon. 38 • American Eel. 39 • Grass Carp . 40 • Bighead Carp. 41 • Silver Carp . 42 White Crappie (Pomoxis annularis) Other Names including reservoirs, oxbow lakes, and rivers. Like other White perch, Sac-a-lait, Slab, and Papermouth. members of the sunfish family, white crappie are nest builders. They produce many eggs, which can cause Description overpopulation, slow growth, and small sizes in small White crappie are deep-bodied and silvery in color, lakes and ponds. White crappie spawn from March ranging from silvery-white on the belly to a silvery-green through May when water temperatures are between or dark green on the back with possible blue reflections. 58ºF and 65ºF. White crappie can tolerate muddier There are several dark vertical bars on the sides. Males water than black crappie. develop dark coloration on the throat and head during the spring spawning season, which can cause them to be State Record mistaken for black crappie.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Lepisosteidae (Gars)
    Invasive Species Fact Sheet Gar, Family Lepisosteidae General Description Gars are large, freshwater fish belonging to the Lepisosteidae family, which consists of 7 species of gar: alligator, Cuban, Florida, longnose, shortnose, spotted, and tropical. Gars have long, cylindrical bodies covered in hard, shiny, diamond-shaped Alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula) scales. Their dorsal and anal fins sit far back on the body, Photo by South Carolina Department of Natural Resources near the tail. They have slender snouts with sharp, needle- like teeth. Gars are generally green to brown in color on their top and sides and white to yellow on their bellies; some species have spots on their bodies and/or fins. The different species of gar can be distinguished by snout length, number of rows of teeth, and the amount and location of spots. Depending on the species, adult gar range from 1 to over 9 feet long. The largest species of gar, the alligator gar, has been reported to grow up to 10 feet and weigh 350 lbs. Current Distribution Gars are not currently found in California. Alligator gars have been collected in California waters on a few occasions, but these fish were likely the result of aquarium releases. Five of the seven gar species are native to the United States. Spotted gars (Lepisosteus oculatus) confiscated Gars are currently found within and outside of their native ranges in by CDFW wardens the United States from the Great Lakes basin in the north, south Photo by CDFW through the Mississippi River drainage to Texas, Mexico, and Florida. Florida gars are only found in Florida and Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Co‐Occurrence Patterns of Gar in River–Floodplain
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management 40:622–637, 2020 © 2019 American Fisheries Society ISSN: 0275-5947 print / 1548-8675 online DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10402 SPECIAL SECTION: ALLIGATOR GAR Occurrence and Co-Occurrence Patterns of Gar in River–Floodplain Habitats: Methods to Leverage Species Coexistence to Benefit Distributional Models David A. Schumann1 and Michael E. Colvin* Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA Leandro E. Miranda U.S. Geological Survey, Mississippi Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Box 9691, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA D. Todd Jones-Farrand U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA Abstract Habitat segregation and hypothesized biotic interactions among coexisting gar species may confound attempts to describe the distributions of these species by using only macrohabitat availability in the presence of conspecifics. How- ever, the strength of interactions among gar species and the spatial scale at which they occur are largely unknown. We used an existing data set to evaluate the co-occurrence patterns (i.e., random assemblages versus species co-occur- ring more or less than expected at random) of three gar species in 62 dynamic river–floodplain habitats associated with the lower Mississippi River and its major tributaries. A novel parameterization of a multispecies occupancy model was utilized to examine the spatial relationships among the full array of possible gar assemblages across a gra- dient of floodplain habitats. Spotted Gar Lepisosteus oculatus were the most abundant and frequently encountered species (~78% of samples). Shortnose Gar L. platostomus (~27% of samples) and Longnose Gar L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Species Management Plan for Alligator Gar (Atractosteus Spatula) in Illinois
    Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Fish Species Management Plan for Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) in Illinois The last vouchered Alligator Gar collected in Illinois waters (Cache-Mississippi R Diversion Channel - 1966) Courtesy of Brooks Burr Fish Species Management Plan for Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) in Illinois April, 2017 Rob Hilsabeck District 4 Fisheries Biologist Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Trent Thomas Region III Streams Biologist Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Nathan Grider Impact Assessment Section Biologist Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Realty and Environmental Planning Division of Ecosystems and Environment Michael McClelland Rivers, Reservoirs, and Inland Waters Program Manager Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Dan Stephenson Chief of Fisheries Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries ii Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………….………...............…………1 Historical Distribution……………..………………….…………...............……..1 Life History and Ecological Information…….……....………................…...…...2 Characteristics……………………………….………...............…………2 Diet ………………………………………….………...............…………3 Reproduction ……………………….……….………...............…………3 Causes of Decline………………………………………….................…………..3
    [Show full text]
  • Primer Designs for Identification and Environmental DNA (Edna)
    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society © 2018 American Fisheries Society ISSN: 0002-8487 print / 1548-8659 online DOI: 10.1002/tafs.10043 SPECIAL SECTION: ANGLING FOR DINOSAURS Primer Designs for Identification and Environmental DNA (eDNA) Detection of Gars Nicole J. Farley and Adrian A. Vasquez Department of Physiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA Richard Kik IV Belle Isle Aquarium, c/o Belle Isle Conservancy, 300 River Place Drive, Suite 2800, Detroit, Michigan 48207, USA Solomon R. David Nicholls State University, 906 East 1st Street, 112 Beauregard Hall, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70310, USA Arjun S. Katailiha Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA Xavier N. Walker Department of Physiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA Jeffrey L. Ram* Department of Physiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA; and Belle Isle Aquarium, c/o Belle Isle Conservancy, 300 River Place Drive, Suite 2800, Detroit, Michigan 48207, USA Abstract Gars (family Lepisosteidae) play important roles as apex predators in freshwater ecosystems, helping to balance fish populations. Several gar species are exploited as food and game fish, and some species are classified as vulnerable due to habitat loss. New molecular techniques to detect, monitor, and identify environmental DNA (eDNA) from gars might help inform management and conservation efforts for these interesting fish. The goal of this project was to develop and test PCR primers for gars, using specimens of all seven gar species, which are on exhibit at the Belle Isle Aquarium in Detroit, Michigan. Focusing on the mitochondrial gene for cytochrome oxidase I, we first designed pri- mers to amplify DNA from all species of gars (“universal gar primers”) and confirmed their specificity in silico.
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage Basin Checklists and Dichotomous Keys for Inland Fishes of Texas
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 874: 31–45Drainage (2019) basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas 31 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas Cody Andrew Craig1, Timothy Hallman Bonner1 1 Department of Biology/Aquatic Station, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA Corresponding author: Cody A. Craig ([email protected]) Academic editor: Kyle Piller | Received 22 April 2019 | Accepted 23 July 2019 | Published 2 September 2019 http://zoobank.org/B4110086-4AF6-4E76-BDAC-EA710AF766E6 Citation: Craig CA, Bonner TH (2019) Drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for inland fishes of Texas. ZooKeys 874: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.874.35618 Abstract Species checklists and dichotomous keys are valuable tools that provide many services for ecological stud- ies and management through tracking native and non-native species through time. We developed nine drainage basin checklists and dichotomous keys for 196 inland fishes of Texas, consisting of 171 native fishes and 25 non-native fishes. Our checklists were updated from previous checklists and revised using reports of new established native and non-native fishes in Texas, reports of new fish occurrences among drainages, and changes in species taxonomic nomenclature. We provided the first dichotomous keys for major drainage basins in Texas. Among the 171 native inland fishes, 6 species are considered extinct or extirpated, 13 species are listed as threatened or endangered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and 59 spe- cies are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) by the state of Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Digital Prairie
    W 2800.7 F293 no. T-14-P-l 10/03-9/05 c.l OKLAHOMA o OCTOBER 1, 2003 through SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 This report summarizes the known species of freshwater mussels existing in Oklahoma. Included in each species account are: Current scientific name Photo of the species Synonymy of names for the species used in Oklahoma in the past Description of the species General distribution of the species Table of shell characters Oklahoma distribution map List of specimen locations in Oklahoma Comments Also included in the report are sections on: Anatomy and physiology of freshwater mussels Literature Mussel conservation Zoogeography Finally at the end of the report are included: Questionable and uncertain species that may occur in Oklahoma Exotic species Species list for major river systems in Oklahoma An expanded list ofunionid literature Glossary of terms Summarize historical and recent literature and collections with descriptions, distributions and photographs ofthe native and introduced freshwater mussels of Oklahoma. Oklahoma is host to approximately 57 species of native Unionid mussels, and several populations with uncertain taxonomic status. Native freshwater mussels are found throughout the state, but species richness declines from east to west across the state. The greatest diversity of mussels occurs in several southeastern rivers such as the - Kiamichi and Little Rivers. Oklahoma's mussels include many widespread species (e.g. Pyganodon grandis, Strophitus undulatus) but also several regionally endemic species restricted to the Ozark and/or Ouachita Highlands (e.g. Ptychobranchus occidentalis, Lampsilis rafinesqueana) or the Gulf Coastal Plain (e.g. Obovaria jacksoniana). Live specimens of at least one species, the Western Fanshell (Cyprogenia aberti), have not been collected in several decades suggesting that this species may be extirpated from Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reintroduction of Alligator Gar (Atractosteus Spatula) at Merwin
    Monitoring of Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) Reintroduced into Merwin Preserve Nathan Grider - University of Illinois, Springfield Rob Hilsabeck - Illinois Department of Natural Resources Status • Populations have declined • Vulnerable to extinction • Reintroduction in AL, AR, FL, KY, LA, MS, MO, OK, TN, and TX M.D. W. F. P Field & Stream River Monsters Jeremy Wade and Mark Spitzer with a 7 ft, 111 lb alligator gar http://colourofautumn1216.blogspot.com/2010/06/river-monsters.html History In Illinois • Last vouchered record from 1966 • Delisted in 1994 (extirpated) • Reintroduction efforts began in 2009 by IDNR Kaskaskia River Why Reintroduce Them? • Increase biodiversity – resist invasion • Apex predators provide top-down control • May control “rough fish” and invasive species • May help prevent stunting of sportfish • Popular food fish • Angling and bowfishing Big Fish Bowfishing Texas™ Merwin Preserve (Spunky Bottoms) • Approximately 590 ha • 100 alligator gar were tagged with passive integrated transponders (PIT), released 9/29/2011 • Average length was 538 mm and weight 886 g Objectives 1) Measure growth rate and compare to data from the southern range 2) Determine condition (fitness) and compare to data from the southern range 3) Investigate prey selection and potential use as a management tool 4) Compare sampling methods used to capture alligator gar Methods Sampling • Sampled May - October = six events • Sample event = two days and one night of extensive gear effort Gears • Modified multifilament gill nets – 3” bar mesh,
    [Show full text]
  • Shortnose Gar (Lepisosteus Platostomus) Predicted Suitable Habitat Modeling
    Shortnose Gar (Lepisosteus platostomus) Predicted Suitable Habitat Modeling Distribution Status: Resident Year Round State Rank: S1 (Species of Concern) Global Rank: G5 Modeling Overview Data Source Last Updated: August 23, 2018 Model Produced On: July 11, 2019 Deductive Modeling Modeling Process, Outputs, and Suggested Uses This is a simple rule-based model using stream reaches and standing waterbodies where the species presence has been confirmed through direct capture or where they are believed to be present based on the professional judgement of a fisheries biologist due to confirmed presence in adjacent areas. See Montana fish distribution, survey, stocking, and genetic testing information from the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks at: http://gis-mtfwp.opendata.arcgis.com/ For compatibility with other predictive distribution models the Montana Natural Heritage Program produces, we have intersected this fish presence information with a uniform grid of hexagons that have been used for planning efforts across the western United States (e.g. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies - Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool). Each hexagon is one square mile in area and approximately one kilometer in length on each side. Any hexagon that intersected a waterbody evaluated as having a species present was classified as suitable habitat; native or introduced. Model outputs are not evaluated and we suggest they be used to generate potential lists of species that may occupy water bodies present within each hexagon for the purposes of landscape-level planning. Model outputs should not be used in place of on-the-ground surveys for species, and wildlife and land management agency biologists should be consulted about the value of using model output to guide habitat management decisions for regional planning efforts or local projects.
    [Show full text]