Bowfishing in the United States: History, Status, Ecological Impact, and a Need for Management Dennis L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bowfishing in the United States: History, Status, Ecological Impact, and a Need for Management Dennis L TRANSACTIONS OF THE KANSAS Vol. 123, no. 3-4 ACADEMY OF SCIENCE p. 285-338 (2020) Bowfishing in the United States: History, status, ecological impact, and a need for management DENNIS L. SCARNECCHIA1 AND JASON D. SCHOOLEY2 1. Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho [email protected] 2. Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Jenks, Oklahoma In this paper we review the history and development of bowfishing, provide a case study of a high-profile bowfishing tournament in Oklahoma, survey and summarize management of the sport in all 50 states, and provide scientifically-based approaches for its management. Bowfishing has a distinct niche in the evolution of the bow and arrow and in fishing, as one of several methods practiced by many and scattered indigenous cultures worldwide. In the past century, advances in technology, including the development of the compound bow, custom boat and lighting systems for night bowfishing, and improved information transfer have opened the sport to many people previously unable to participate in the sport at a satisfying level. Bowfishing poses some distinct challenges for fisheries managers compared to angling, including the impracticality of catch-and-release, non- catch (wounding) mortality, and by-catch mortality of non-targeted native species. In 2019, we conducted a survey of 50 state fish and wildlife agencies that indicated only nine states had bowfishing education programs and none had articulated management goals or plans specific to the sport. Evidence indicates that bowfishing may provide plentiful opportunities for harvesting nuisance invasive species such as Asian carps (Cyprinidae) and the Common Carp Cyprinus carpio, but must be practiced much more judiciously, and in some instances, not at all, depending on locality, for higher valued native species such as buffalofishes (Catostomidae: Ictiobus spp.), Paddlefish Polyodon spathula, gars (Lepisosteidae), and rays (Batoidea). Whereas in the terrestrial and avian species that bowhunters most commonly target, males reach a larger size than females, in fish species targeted by bowfishers, the opposite is the case. The result is selective depletion of large, older, mature females and evolutionarily disruptive truncation of life histories. We suggest ten of many potential topics for consideration in agency management planning for bowfisheries. We seek to provide agencies information for developing historical, ecological, and socioeconomic perspectives for managing bowfisheries, as other fisheries, as instruments of species conservation, public benefit, and sound long-term public policy. Keywords: fisheries management, gars, Asian Carp, buffalofishes, Paddlefish, archery, bow and arrow Introduction Whether you are a beginning, intermediate, Every aspect of human technology has a or even advanced archer, archery will give dark side, including the bow and arrow. – you something that’s almost impossible to Margaret Atwood find elsewhere. – USA Archery What are we looking for? Basically, any “[Archery] a sport which is as harmless trash fish that will swim, but the main and fascinating as it is old and target today is gonna be some gars… – honorable” – Maurice Thompson (1878, Relentless Anglin’ (2017) p. 1) The Witchery of Archery. 286 Scarnecchia and Schooley Figure 1. Bowfishing from a custom-designed boat equipped with flood lights, trolling motor, and raised platform for night bowfishing. Note the fourth bow on deck and the large stock tank in the image foreground used as a receptacle for shot fish that are landed. Image courtesy of Zach Kjos, North Dakota Game and Fish Department. Bowfishing, the taking of fish with a bow and 2006). With the expanded interest in bowfishing arrow, or a crossbow, is a specialized sport has come major expansion in the technology gaining interest and participation in both fresh of bowfishing gears (Fig. 1), a proliferation and marine waters. It is one of the fastest of bowfishing tournaments with large cash growing segments of archery sports in the prizes, and professional associations dedicated United States (Woody 2019). As one aficionado to the sport. The tournaments, by “combining described it, “for as little as $20.00 you can the challenge of bow fishing with the spirit of get a drum reel and an arrow. You can shoot competition, … can be as fun or as serious as from shore or a boat. Day or night. Alone or you want to make it... Tournaments can range with some friends. You can target Common from a couple of hours to days. The longer Carp to alligators and stingrays.” (Appleberg tournaments are often described as ‘Ironman’ Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 123(3-4), 2020 287 tourneys. Indeed, you have to be tough as nails Bowfishing also affords greater opportunity to shoot for 24 hours straight. It’s the archery to shoot, kill, and maim, often without version of an extreme sport.” (Appleberg 2006). making use of the fish, than is typical in most bowhunting. Liberal or no bag limits Several factors have influenced the growth for bowfishing nuisance species such as the of bowfishing. Ecological changes have invasive carps allow much more opportunity also contributed to the increasing national for take than does bowhunting large terrestrial and regional interest and participation in game species such as deer or elk. Bowfishing bowfishing. Dam construction throughout the is seen by some as providing a service to United States has concentrated pre-spawning anglers. With the increase in recreational and fish in areas such as clear tailwaters especially tournament angler (i.e., hook and line) interest amenable to bowfishing (Mestl et al. 2019). in specific game species such as the basses More shallow, lentic habitat in bays has also (e.g., Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides) resulted from dam construction and reservoir has come a desire to reduce other native impoundment, where fish can be more easily species not viewed favorably by most anglers seen and shot with a bow and arrow. Species but found to be removable with bowfishing. such as gars (Lepisosteidae), which inhabit Such species include gars, Bowfin Amia calva, shallow spawning areas in spring and summer suckers and buffalofishes (Catostomidae), and, (Allen et al. 2020), where they often bask in marine habitats, rays (Batoidea). (Potter 1927) and gulp air during oxygen- depleted times (McCormack 1967), can be Other factors contributing to the increased especially vulnerable to bowfishing. Another participation in bowfishing may be rooted factor has been the increase throughout in human psychology, mental control, much of the United States of nonnative fish, and spiritual training (Haywood 2006). A including the Common Carp Cyprinus carpio, sampling of social media (text and video) Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella and other quickly displays the passion with which many invasive Asian carps (Cyprinidae: Bighead bowfishers pursue their hobby. Archery has Carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis, Silver Carp been recognized as a skill sport in which both H. molitrix, Black Carp Mylopharyngodon hits and near misses fuel the illusion of control, piceus; Hinterthuer (2012)). potentially leading to the compulsive desire to continue participating (Clark 2014). The Improved archery technology since the 1970s, potentially compulsive aspects of the sport including the invention of the compound bow have been described, often with an almost (Allen 1969; Robb 2018), has opened the sport religious fervor, by adherents. The German to archery achievements by many men, women, philosophy professor, Eugen Herrigel, studied and children unable to handle longbows and Japanese archery (kyūdō) in his exploration recurve bows to their satisfaction. Custom boats of Zen (Herrigel 1953). Archery is seen as a with raised decks and elaborate lighting systems source of mental discipline and control (Shōji for night use are now designed and equipped 2001). As Zen scholar D. T. Suzuki introduced specifically for bowfishing (Fig. 1). Increased Herrigel’s (1953) book: “In the case of archery, access to bowfishing information from diverse the hitter and the hit are no longer two opposing media outlets has provided bowfishers an objects, but are one reality” (p. viii). The opportunity to become informed faster than has practice, control and focus required in archery ever been possible. Technological advances has also been recognized and applied as such as cell phones and GPS devices have therapeutic for various life stressors, including increased the efficiency and responsiveness of post-traumatic stress disorder (Bryan et al. fishers (e.g., Cachon et al. 2015). 2018; The Ranch Tennessee 2020). 288 Scarnecchia and Schooley Bowfishing is practiced on a variety of may be greater than in hook and line fishing species of widely different perceived value to (i.e., angling). Many of the species are also society: invasive species such as the nonnative longer-lived than most terrestrial quarry (Bell Common Carp and Asian carps (Bajer et al. 1980; Scarnecchia et al. 2014; Daugherty 2016; Phelps et al. 2017), native, historically et al. 2019, 2020; Lackmann et al. 2019). underutilized but now often declining species A size and age bias and resulting truncated such as buffalofishes (Ictiobus spp.; Solomon age structure can create unnatural selection et al. 2016), native predators such as gars of pressures and evolutionary responses in a fish substantial ecological value (Scarnecchia 1992; stock (Kuparinen and Merilä 2007) that some Bennett et al.
Recommended publications
  • Best Compound Bow Strings
    Best Compound Bow Strings Best Compound Bow Strings 1 Introduction 2 Best Compound Bow Strings 3 1. KESHES B-55 Dacron Replacement Recurve Bowstring 3 2. Premium Gear B-50 Dacron Replacement Recurve Bowstring 4 3. Jaguar CRS-004C Crossbow String 5 4. Southland Archery Supply SAS B-50 Dacron Replacement Traditional Recurve Bow String 6 5. Replacement Archery Bowstring for Traditional Recurve Bows 7 6. FLEMISH Fast Flight Plus Replacement Recurve Bowstring 8 7. SAS Flemish Fast Flight Replacement Traditional Recurve Bowstring 9 Buyer’s Guide for the Best Compound Bow Strings 10 FAQs about Compound Bow Strings 14 Conclusion 16 Introduction When it comes to compound bowstrings, finding the one that’s just right for you is pretty difficult. You need to consider so many factors like the bow string’s craftsmanship, how it will be used, the material, the type of bow string, and so many more. If you don’t get a compound bow string that’s suitable for your strength level and needs, then it might end up hurting you or it might not be effective enough. That’s why we’ve done all the research to help you figure out which is the best bow string for you. So read on for a detailed overview of the best compound bow strings on the market. Best Compound Bow Strings 1. KESHES B-55 Dacron Replacement Recurve Bowstring https://www.amazon.com/dp/B075RVGBSS KESHES B-55 Dacron Bowstring is the latest version of the highly-acclaimed Dacron series. This bowstring is as powerful and has as much stretch as the B-50, but it’s more durable and lasts longer because the stretch is less permanent.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1
    On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1 B.W. Kooi Groningen, The Netherlands 1983 1B.W. Kooi, On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow PhD-thesis, Mathematisch Instituut, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands (1983), Supported by ”Netherlands organization for the advancement of pure research” (Z.W.O.), project (63-57) 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Prefaceandsummary.............................. 5 1.2 Definitionsandclassifications . .. 7 1.3 Constructionofbowsandarrows . .. 11 1.4 Mathematicalmodelling . 14 1.5 Formermathematicalmodels . 17 1.6 Ourmathematicalmodel. 20 1.7 Unitsofmeasurement.............................. 22 1.8 Varietyinarchery................................ 23 1.9 Qualitycoefficients ............................... 25 1.10 Comparison of different mathematical models . ...... 26 1.11 Comparison of the mechanical performance . ....... 28 2 Static deformation of the bow 33 2.1 Summary .................................... 33 2.2 Introduction................................... 33 2.3 Formulationoftheproblem . 34 2.4 Numerical solution of the equation of equilibrium . ......... 37 2.5 Somenumericalresults . 40 2.6 A model of a bow with 100% shooting efficiency . .. 50 2.7 Acknowledgement................................ 52 3 Mechanics of the bow and arrow 55 3.1 Summary .................................... 55 3.2 Introduction................................... 55 3.3 Equationsofmotion .............................. 57 3.4 Finitedifferenceequations . .. 62 3.5 Somenumericalresults . 68 3.6 On the behaviour of the normal force
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Family
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Characterization of the G protein‑coupled receptor family SREB across fsh evolution Timothy S. Breton1*, William G. B. Sampson1, Benjamin Cliford2, Anyssa M. Phaneuf1, Ilze Smidt3, Tamera True1, Andrew R. Wilcox1, Taylor Lipscomb4,5, Casey Murray4 & Matthew A. DiMaggio4 The SREB (Super‑conserved Receptors Expressed in Brain) family of G protein‑coupled receptors is highly conserved across vertebrates and consists of three members: SREB1 (orphan receptor GPR27), SREB2 (GPR85), and SREB3 (GPR173). Ligands for these receptors are largely unknown or only recently identifed, and functions for all three are still beginning to be understood, including roles in glucose homeostasis, neurogenesis, and hypothalamic control of reproduction. In addition to the brain, all three are expressed in gonads, but relatively few studies have focused on this, especially in non‑mammalian models or in an integrated approach across the entire receptor family. The purpose of this study was to more fully characterize sreb genes in fsh, using comparative genomics and gonadal expression analyses in fve diverse ray‑fnned (Actinopterygii) species across evolution. Several unique characteristics were identifed in fsh, including: (1) a novel, fourth euteleost‑specifc gene (sreb3b or gpr173b) that likely emerged from a copy of sreb3 in a separate event after the teleost whole genome duplication, (2) sreb3a gene loss in Order Cyprinodontiformes, and (3) expression diferences between a gar species and teleosts. Overall, gonadal patterns suggested an important role for all sreb genes in teleost testicular development, while gar were characterized by greater ovarian expression that may refect similar roles to mammals. The novel sreb3b gene was also characterized by several unique features, including divergent but highly conserved amino acid positions, and elevated brain expression in pufer (Dichotomyctere nigroviridis) that more closely matched sreb2, not sreb3a.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus Elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications Summer 2020 Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River Dakota S. Radford Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Radford, Dakota S., "Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River" (2020). Masters Theses. 4806. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4806 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AGING TECHNIQUES & POPULATION DYNAMICS OF BLUE SUCKERS (CYCLEPTUS ELONGATUS) IN THE LOWER WABASH RIVER By Dakota S. Radford B.S. Environmental Biology Eastern Illinois University A thesis prepared for the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biological Sciences Eastern Illinois University May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Thesis abstract .................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Product Guide 2019 If Bowfishing Is an Off-Season Sport, Then We Are the Boys and Girls of Summer
    PRODUCT GUIDE 2019 IF BOWFISHING IS AN OFF-SEASON SPORT, THEN WE ARE THE BOYS AND GIRLS OF SUMMER. We live for the nature, the comradery that comes along with being on the bank or in a boat with our close friends for hours on end, the feeling we get in the pit of our stomachs when the swirl of the water reveals a record-breaking beast so close we can almost feel the fight it’s about to put up, the summer sun grazing our skin as a snicker of excitement escapes our mouths and brushes past our strings as we draw the perfect release. We were made for this. And, everything we make is made for you. At Cajun Bowfishing, we do everything we can to push the envelope to make sure everyone’s bowfishing experience is as enjoyable as ours is, summer after summer. Our equipment is ruggedly field tested to meet the highest standards, our products are backed by our No Refraction Warranty and we create usable technology available to everyone. We continue to take steps in innovation to ensure we are constantly bringing new technology to the table while keeping products affordable, so your off-season can look like ours. CONTENTS 2 Sucker Punch Bow 3 Shore Runner Bow 4 Fish Stick Bow 5 Fish Stick Pro Bow 6 Winch Pro Reel 7 Spin Doctor 8 Screw-on, Tape-on Reels & Kits 9 Points & Shafts 10 Accessories 12 Pro Staff 14 Cajun 8 15 Apparel 17 Warranty Bowfishing SUCKER PUNCH Bow LIKE AN OLD, HOT-HEADED FRIEND the Sucker Punch has your back.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 101 Minnesota Statutes 1941
    MINNESOTA STATUTES 1941 101.01 DIVISION OF GAME AND FISH; FISH 846 CHAPTER 101 DIVISION OF GAME AND FISH; FISH Sec. Sec. 101.01 Manner of taking flsh 101.21 Sale of flsh caught In certain counties; o).her 101.02 Manner of taking minnows for bait flsh not bought or sold at any time 101.03 Open season for black bass and yellow bass 101.22 Prohibited methods and equipments 101.04 Open season for trout, except lake trout; 101.23 Polluting streams hours for taking 101.24 Fish screens; removal 101.05 Fishing in trout streams 101.25 Dark houses or fish houses, when used; 101.06 Open season for lake trout licenses 101.07 Open season for pike, pickerel, and muskel- 101.26 Open season for whiteflsh, tullibees, and her­ lunge ring 101.08 Closed season for sturgeon, hackleback, 101.27 Open season for frogs spoonbill, or paddleflsh. 101.28 Turtles and tortoises 101.09 Open season for crappies 101.29 Fishways; construction; fishing near flshways 101.10 Fishing in boundary waters forbidden 101.11 Open season for fishing in boundary waters 101.30 Fish may be taken and sold from certain lakes 101.12 Open season for sunflsh, rock bass, and other 10.1.31 Regulations by director / varieties 101.32 Restriction 101.13 Open season for sunflsh in Goodhue county 101.34 Sections 101.30 to 101.32 supplementary 101.14 Open season for carp, dogfish, redhorse, 101.35 Disposition of dead flsh sheepshead, catfish, suckers, eelpout, garfish, 101.36 Open season for fishing in Lake of the Woods bullheads, whiteflsh, and buffaloflsh 101.37 Open season for suckers and other rough flsh 101.153 Propagation of game flsh in Lake of the Woods 101.16 When and where artificial lights may be used 101.38 Fishing from towed boats prohibited in spearing certain fish 101.39 Taking of fish in natural spawning beds 101.18 Placing carp in waters prohibited prohibited 101.19 Fishing in Minneapolis 101.40 Fish screens; permits 101.20 Limit of catch 101.01 MANNER OF TAKING FISH.
    [Show full text]
  • Rough Fish”: Paradigm Shift in the Conservation of Native Fishes Andrew L
    PERSPECTIVE Goodbye to “Rough Fish”: Paradigm Shift in the Conservation of Native Fishes Andrew L. Rypel | University of California, Davis, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 | University of California, Davis, Center for Watershed Sciences, Davis, CA. E-mail: [email protected] Parsa Saffarinia | University of California, Davis, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, Davis, CA Caryn C. Vaughn | University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Biology, Norman, OK Larry Nesper | University of Wisconsin–Madison, Department of Anthropology, Madison, WI Katherine O’Reilly | University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences, Notre Dame, IN Christine A. Parisek | University of California, Davis, Center for Watershed Sciences, Davis, CA | University of California, Davis, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, Davis, CA | The Nature Conservancy, Science Communications, Boise, ID Peter B. Moyle | University of California, Davis, Center for Watershed Sciences, Davis, CA Nann A. Fangue | University of California, Davis, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, Davis, CA Miranda Bell- Tilcock | University of California, Davis, Center for Watershed Sciences, Davis, CA David Ayers | University of California, Davis, Center for Watershed Sciences, Davis, CA | University of California, Davis, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, Davis, CA Solomon R. David | Nicholls State University, Department of Biological Sciences, Thibodaux, LA While sometimes difficult to admit, perspectives of European and white males have overwhelmingly dominated fisheries science and management in the USA. This dynamic is exemplified by bias against “rough fish”— a pejorative ascribing low- to- zero value for countless native fishes. One product of this bias is that biologists have ironically worked against conservation of diverse fishes for over a century, and these problems persist today.
    [Show full text]
  • Gar (Lepisosteidae)
    Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Animal Information Series Gar (Lepisosteidae) Gar species found in Indiana waters: -Longnose Gar (Lepisosteus osseus) -Shortnose Gar (Lepisosteus platostomus) -Spotted Gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) -Alligator Gar* (Atractosteus spatula) *Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) Alligator gar were extirpated in many states due to habitat destruction, but now they have been reintroduced to their old native habitat in the states of Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Because they have been stocked into the Ohio River, there is a possibility that alligator gar are either already in Indiana or will be found here in the future. Alligator gar are one of the largest freshwater fishes of North America and can reach up to 10 feet long and weigh 300 pounds. Alligator gar are passive, solitary fishes that live in large rivers, swamps, bayous, and lakes. They have a short, wide snout and a double row of teeth on the upper jaw. They are ambush predators that eat mainly fish but have also been seen to eat waterfowl. They are not, however, harmful to humans, as they will only attack an animal that they can swallow whole. Photo Credit: Duane Raver, USFWS Other Names -garpike, billy gar -Shortnose gar: shortbill gar, stubnose gar -Longnose gar: needlenose gar, billfish Why are they called gar? The Anglo-Saxon word gar means spear, which describes the fishes’ long spear-like appearance. The genus name Lepisosteus contains the Greek words lepis which means “scale” and osteon which means “bone.” What do they look like? Gar are slender, cylindrical fishes with hard, diamond-shaped and non-overlapping scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Pneumatic Tennis Ball Antenna Launching
    Pneumatic Tennis Ball Antenna Launching Alan Biocca WB6ZQZ Eric Williams WD6CMU October 2004 v0.28 www.qsl.net/wb6zqz/antlaunching.html This Presentation Material: 50+ slides and a short video Handout sheet has web URLs, etc This presentation available online Courtesy of QSL.net (www.qsl.net/wb6zqz) Interrupt with questions that are of interest to everyone, due to time constraints please take offline those that are lengthy or not of general interest Purpose of Antenna Launching To Install Antennae in Trees For Emergency Communications, Field Day, Portable Field Ops (QRP/QRO), Home station operations... To do so Safely and Effectively Audience Survey How many folks have used: Slingshots to put up Antenna Lines? Hand Throwing? Fishing Pole (Casting)? Bow and Arrow? Combustion Launcher? (Potato cannon) Compressed Air Launcher? Systems we used Previously Archery Slingshots Fishing Pole (Casting) Throwing a rock, stick, ball, water bottle ... Climbing trees Poles, Towers, (guyed), etc Helium Balloons, Kites, Other Concern over Safety Issues Loose or Misdirected Projectile Rebounding/Deflected Projectile Projectile Retrieval Stuck projectile left behind (to fall later...) Skinned arms, knuckles Falling from tree, branches falling, ... Falling Towers, poles, etc How to Increase Safety? Use a Tower Trailer? Keep both feet on the Ground Use a Large and Soft Projectile 2 Keep the velocity low (k.e. = ½mv ) What about a Tennis Ball? Launching Requirements Launch a Tennis Ball Towing a line up to 150+ feet in
    [Show full text]
  • Judging Newsletter Edited by the World Archery Judge Committee
    World Archery Judging Newsletter Edited by the World Archery Judge Committee JUDGING NEWSLETTER WORLD ARCHERY FEDERATION ISSUE #92 August 2016 Content 1. Editorial 7. Bylaw regarding how to handle pass throughs and boucers 2. Judges conference in Medellin, COL 8. License revoked 3. Upcoming judges conference 9. Pictures of recent judges commissions 4. Oustanding Judge Service Award 10. Reply to Case Studie 91 5. Application for duty in 2017 11. New case studies. 6. Bylaw related to scoring 1. Editorial by Morten Wilmann, Chairman Dear Judges, When writing this editorial we are just up front of the Olympics. For judges on duty for that event, it is starting to be a bit thrilling. Some athletes are saying that this “is only one event like other events”, and some may regard it as such (although I doubt if they manage). In spite of recent news about extensive doping in some sports and in some countries, I still think that the Olympics stands out as a very special event, well regarded and connected with “personal glory” for the winners. Archery in the Olympics 2016 – in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil – takes place in the famous street of the Sanbodromo where the carnival regularly takes place, again a rather iconic place for archery. These are surroundings that may add some thrill to the competition, and your committee is confident that our judges will perform at the same top level as the archers – in spite of the possible stress of the moments. Morten Issue No. 92 Page 1/17 August 2016 World Archery Judging Newsletter Edited by the World Archery Judge Committee 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelkey's Green Mountain Throwdown Bow Fishing Tournament
    Pelkey’s Green Mountain Throwdown Bow Fishing Tournament Rules & Regulaons 1. All contestants must register before shoong. You must shoot your own fish. Registraon will end at 2pm on Friday June 4th. Tournament will conclude at 9am, Sunday, June 6th. 2. Final weigh-in is on Sunday, June 6 th at Pelkey’s Archery. Teams will be assigned weigh-in mes: All fish must be at Pelkey’s at your designated me to be eligible. 3. Parcipants must follow CDC and Vermont Covid-19 guidelines, including six foot social distancing rules during weigh-in. 4. All fish must be harvested on Lake Champlain. Fish entered must be shot alive. This is a carp only tournament. 5. Compound, recurve, longbow and crossbow are eligible as long as there is a reel and line aached to the arrow for retrieval. 6. Fish entries must be taken with compound, recurve, longbow, or crossbow and single point arrow only. 7. No fish points/arrows with explosives or other shocking devices will be allowed. 8. All arrows must have a line aached to it for retrieval. This line must be aached to a reel on the bow. 9. No snares, no dip nets, and no gigs will be allowed in boats. 10. Reported transferring of fish between teams will result in disqualificaon of all teams involved. At no me is one team’s fish to be placed in another team’s boat. 11. No baing or chumming of fish. 12. No unsportsmanlike conduct will be tolerated. Teams will keep a minimum distance of 25 yards from competors whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • EAHCP 2019 Annual Report
    Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan 2019 Annual Report Prepared for The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service On behalf of The Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan and Permittees Prepared by Blanton & Associates, Inc. March 27, 2020 EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2019 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2019 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan The Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan (EAHCP) is the primary document that establishes the cooperative effort to protect the water of the Southern Segment of the Edwards Aquifer (“Edwards” or “Aquifer”) both for people in the region and the threatened and endangered species that inhabit the Aquifer, and aquatic spring environments whose water largely emanates from the Aquifer. This effort began when regional stakeholders and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) initiated the Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program (EARIP) in 2006. The Texas Legislature mandated participation in the process by the Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Department of Agriculture, Texas Parks & Wildlife Department (TPWD), and Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). The EARIP planning group led to the creation of the process known as the EAHCP Program, which has now been fully transitioned from the EARIP. The EAHCP was completed in November 2012 and led to the approval of an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) issued in February 2013 by the USFWS to be effective in March 2013. The ITP has been amended once. This Annual Report has been prepared for submittal to the USFWS, as required by the ITP.
    [Show full text]