DOCSLIB.ORG

Finding Tolerance And/Or Resistance to Huanglongbing in Citrus Relatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finding Tolerance And/Or Resistance to Huanglongbing in Citrus Relatives Finding tolerance and/or resistance to huanglongbing in citrus relatives Chandrika Ramadugu1, Ed Stover2, Manjunath Keremane3, Greg McCollum2, David Hall2, Mikeal Roose1, and Richard Lee3 1University of California, Riverside, CA 2USDA ARS, Ft. Pierce, FL 3USDA ARS, Riverside, CA Why should we be concerned about finding resistance/tolerance to HLB? After Hurrican Irma, even lower: 50M Source: Wall Street Journal Background of the search for HLB resistance • In 2007, we began research to evaluate several Citrus genotypes for tolerance to HLB – Seed from “Core Collection” was collected in CA, shipped to FL • “Core Collection” = 40 citrus hybrids identified using SSR markers which represent about 85% of the genetic diversity which was identified using 23 SSR markers, Barkley et al, 2006 – Other seed which had been collected and which was available at Repository – Type genotypes, P. trifoliata, pummelo, etc – Planted in the field in spring 2009 – 65 Citrus accessions, 33 accessions belonging to 20 other closely related genera Background of the search for HLB resistance Located at USDA ARS Picos Farm, severe HLB, canker, no vector control. Plants were fertilized, watered but and received minimal pest management care. Took observations, collected samples in March and October each year, testing samples by qPCR for multiple regions of HLB genome. DNA from mature leaves, selected symptomatic leaves if they were present. Site for field trial Planted in the field at USDA ARS, Fort Pierce, FL Observations on HLB, canker and leaf miner, plant growth parameters. October 2009 October 2013 October 2013 October 2009 Categorized the plants into 8 groups. We know that there is no clear cut resistance in Citrus. Did not want to make it into three categories-susceptible, moderate and resistant. We wanted to capture the plants that are in between these clear cut categories. S R Category 8 6Category 1 7 1 3 5 4 Susceptible2 Resistant Glycosmis Category One Immune; Glycosmis pentaphylla (orange berry) (psyllid colonized on these), and Clausena excavata (pink wampee). Never able todetect Las over the 6 year period. Hesperethusa Category Two Resistant; No symptoms, LAS negative. Afraegle, Bergera, Casimiroa edulis (white sapota) (psyllid did not colonize), Eremocitrus, Naringi, Simmon’s trifoliate, Zanthoxylum (psyllid did not colonize on this), Murraya exotica. Low levels of Las occasionally detected, but did not establish. Eremocitrus is sexually compatible with citrus; Naringi crenulata (Hesperethusa) and Eremocitrus are graft-compatible with citrus. COX2010 COX2011 COX2012 LAS2010 LAS2011 LAS2012 LAS_LJABI 23.16 23.71 18.60 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 21.09 18.88 22.09 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 19.57 21.76 18.59 38.17 34.86 40.00 40.00 16.81 40.00 18.36 38.40 40.00 40.00 40.00 17.79 24.49 19.65 38.17 35.92 40.00 40.00 Category Three Highly tolerant; Within an accession, some plants are susceptible, some plants have no LAS or symptoms. Includes accessions: Balsamocitrus daweii, Mesero lemon, Microcitrus australis (Aust. Round lime), Sydney hybrid (M. australis X M. australasica), Citrus halimii, Faustrimedin (XMicrocitronella), Microcitrus australasica (Aust. finger lime). Sydney hybrid Australian finger lime (M. australis X M. australasica) Microcitrus australasica Category four Tolerant; recover from infection. Aegle, Aeglopsis, Hassaku (pummelo hybrid) , Balsamocitrus daweii, Citrus latipes (‘Khasi’ papeda), Microcitrus australis (Aust. round lime), Hawaiian Mock Orange (Murraya sp.), Orange jasmine (Murraya sp.). Microcitrus COX2010 COX2011 COX2012 LAS2010 LAS2011 LAS2012 LAS_LJABI 21.76 20.28 15.514 27.1 32.99 28.279 34.123 18.77 21.94 18.582 40 40 30.495 38.892 17.44 27.49 20.205 31.97 30.2 33.628 38.270 23.73 28.9 16.277 40 31.25 40.000 40.000 27.77 20.65 17.934 40 40 40.000 40.000 17.59 23.72 19.465 40 40 40.000 39.413 Murraya paniculata (Hawaiian Mock Orange) COX2010 COX2011 COX2012 LAS2010 LAS2011 LAS2012 LAS_LJABI 17.04 30.75 19.60 40.00 40.00 35.34 40.00 21.42 28.31 16.08 38.89 40.00 40.00 40.00 25.76 37.77 22.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 25.78 19.33 19.14 40.00 34.65 40.00 40.00 Murraya 40.00 22.90 18.38 40.00 37.04 40.00 40.00 17.02 40.00 18.32 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 There is infection. Plant can ward it off. 16.86 23.65 19.21 28.04 40.00 40.00 40.00 16.40 40.00 20.91 28.51 40.00 40.00 40.00 Category Five Tolerant, delayed infection; characterized by delayed infection with Las, Only two accession: X639 (Citroncirus), and little leaf trifoliate (Poncirus). COX2010 COX2011 COX2012 LAS2010 LAS2011 LAS2012 LAS_LJABI X Citroncirus 21.16 19.18 18.74 40.00 40.00 23.71 22.36 21.16 19.18 22.95 40.00 40.00 40.00 22.36 X639 17.74 21.89 18.37 33.26 40.00 25.37 27.72 25.52 21.46 18.41 36.91 35.69 25.72 27.87 (Delayed 27.27 21.56 18.93 32.13 35.96 25.94 31.55 24.40 16.28 40.00 25.99 28.17 symptoms) 18.40 22.20 17.35 40.00 29.79 35.85 40.00 21.16 19.18 22.95 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 21.16 19.18 18.74 40.00 40.00 23.71 40.00 22.81 21.73 17.85 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 Poncirus trifoliata COX2010 COX2011 COX2012 LAS2010 LAS2011 LAS2012 LAS_LJABI 22.85 21.76 15.91 40.00 40.00 26.34 31.85 Little leaf 22.31 19.37 14.93 31.62 33.85 28.37 29.41 16.75 24.67 18.71 40.00 30.29 29.32 32.62 (Delayed 16.32 40.00 16.70 40.00 40.00 29.66 31.47 symptoms) 24.40 40.00 18.58 40.00 29.13 30.06 28.70 22.13 40.00 15.10 40.00 38.19 30.60 35.12 33.54 18.63 16.99 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 14.58 28.74 18.63 37.26 40.00 40.00 40.00 Category descriptions Category Symptoms Typical accession in category 6 Susceptible to 38 accessions, mostly belonging to Las Citrus, Severinia, and Xcitroncirus, consistently tested positive for Las, remained alive for 4 years but retained some leaves 7 Susceptible to 25 accessions including many Las mandarins, certain pummelos, sour oranges, some lemons and limes. Alive for 4 years but severe symptoms and leaf loss 8 Susceptible to Died before 4 years, included Las some mandarins Field trial in Florida identified HLB resistant and tolerant accessions. Plants that showed immune, resistant or tolerant response to citrus HLB in our field trial are listed here: Immune (no HLB multiplication): Clausena excavata and Glycosmis pentaphylla. Resistant (transient replication but HLB does not establish in the host): Bergera koenigii, Casimiroa edulis, Eremocitrus glauca, Murraya paniculata (Orange jasmine), Naringi crenulata, Zanthoxylum ailanthoides. Tolerant (lower level of HLB but plants survive and produce fruit): Citrus halimii, Microcitrus australasica, Microcitrus hybrid (‘Sydney hybrid’), M. inodora, ‘Faustrimedin’, ‘Simmon’s trifoliate’, Aegle, Aeglopsis, Balsamocitrus daweii, Citrus latipes, Microcitrus Publications: australis, ‘Hawaiian mock orange’, ‘Little leaf’ http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/pdf/10.1094/PDIS-03-16-0271-RE trifoliate, ‘X639’ trifoliate. http://citrusresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/CRB-Citrograph-Mag-Q2-2016-web.pdf (pp 46-51) Accessions that are sexually compatible with Citrus are indicated in red font with underline. These may be useful in breeding trials. HLB resistant and tolerant Australian limes selected for breeding Breeding for resistance: List of successful crosses No. Seed parent Pollen parent 1 Australian Finger lime C146 trifoliate 2 Australian Finger lime Carrizo 3 Australian Finger lime Eremolemon 4 Australian Finger lime Hirado Buntan pummelo 5 Australian Finger lime Simmons trifoliate 6 Encore mandarin Australian Desert lime No. Seed parent Pollen parent 7 Encore mandarin Australian Finger lime 19 Fortune mandarin Australian Round lime 8 Encore mandarin Eremolemon 20 Fortune mandarin Large leaf Australian wild lime 21 Fortune mandarin Sydney hybrid 9 Encore mandarin Large leaf Australian wild lime 22 Monoembryonic trifoliate Australian Desert lime 10 Encore mandarin Sydney hybrid 23 Pomeroy trifoliate Australian Desert lime 11 Fallglo mandarin Australian Desert lime 24 Pomeroy trifoliate Australian Round lime 12 Fallglo mandarin Australian Finger lime 25 Pomeroy trifoliate Large leaf Australian wild lime 13 Fallglo mandarin Eremolemon 26 Rich 16-6 trifoliate Australian Finger lime 14 Fallglo mandarin Large leaf Australian wild lime 27 Temple tangor Australian Desert lime 15 Flying Dragon trifoliate Australian Finger lime 28 Temple tangor Australian Finger lime 16 Flying Dragon trifoliate Australian Round lime 29 Temple tangor Eremolemon 17 Flying Dragon trifoliate Large leaf Australian wild lime 30 Webber-Fawcett trifoliate Australian Finger lime 18 Fortune mandarin Australian Finger lime 31 Volckameriana lemon hybrid Australian Desert lime 32 Wilking mandarin Australian Desert lime 33 Wilking mandarin Australian Finger lime 34 Wilking mandarin Australian Round lime 35 Wilking mandarin Eremolemon 36 Wilking mandarin Large leaf Australian wild lime 37 Wilking mandarin Sydney hybrid Resistance observed in citrus relatives is heritable We determined that: 1. There is resistance in the sub family Aurantioideae (field trial). 2. The resistance is heritable (controlled greenhouse experiments). X Eremocitrus glauca ‘Meyer lemon’ Plant no. 69 Plant no. 95 Ct for Las is 40. Ct for Las is 26.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effect of Temperature on Germination of Citrus Macroptera, Citrus Latipes and Citrus Indica Seeds *Anamika Upadhaya, Shiva S
    ISSN. 0972 - 8406 The NEHU Journal Vol. XVII, No. 1 (January - June) and No. 2 (July - December) 2019, pp. 12-20 Effect of temperature on germination of Citrus macroptera, Citrus latipes and Citrus indica seeds *Anamika Upadhaya, Shiva S. Chaturvedi, Brajesh K. Tiwari and Dibyendu Paul Department of Environmental Studies, North Eastern Hill University Umshing, Meghalaya, India – 793022 *Corresponding author : [email protected] Abstract Seeds are an important means of propagation of Citrus species. Seeds of three wild Citrus namely; Citrus macroptera Montrouz., Citrus latipes (Swingle) Tanaka and Citrus indica Tanaka were germinated at 20°C, 25°C, 30°C and 35°C temperature to observe the effect of temperature on germination. Mean germination time and percentage seed germinated were recorded and used to determine optimum temperature for germination. Viability of seeds determined using chemical and germination tests yielded similar results. Optimum temperature for germination was found to be 28°C for C. macroptera and C. latipes and 26°C for C. indica. Keywords: Germination, wild, C. macroptera, C. latipes, C. indica, Meghalaya Introduction Citrus has been domesticated since ancient times, and where ‘natural’ populations are located, it is often difficult to determine whether they represent wild ancestors or are derived from naturalized forms of introduced varieties. Though relatively rare in wild, Citrus are mostly found as scattered trees in primary forests in remote areas rather than as pure stands. In India, a vast reservoir of Citrus diversity exists both in wild and in cultivated forms. North-eastern India is considered as natural home of many Citrus species with wide occurrence of indigenous species like C.
    [Show full text]
  • Holdings of the University of California Citrus Variety Collection 41
    Holdings of the University of California Citrus Variety Collection Category Other identifiers CRC VI PI numbera Accession name or descriptionb numberc numberd Sourcee Datef 1. Citron and hybrid 0138-A Indian citron (ops) 539413 India 1912 0138-B Indian citron (ops) 539414 India 1912 0294 Ponderosa “lemon” (probable Citron ´ lemon hybrid) 409 539491 Fawcett’s #127, Florida collection 1914 0648 Orange-citron-hybrid 539238 Mr. Flippen, between Fullerton and Placentia CA 1915 0661 Indian sour citron (ops) (Zamburi) 31981 USDA, Chico Garden 1915 1795 Corsican citron 539415 W.T. Swingle, USDA 1924 2456 Citron or citron hybrid 539416 From CPB 1930 (Came in as Djerok which is Dutch word for “citrus” 2847 Yemen citron 105957 Bureau of Plant Introduction 3055 Bengal citron (ops) (citron hybrid?) 539417 Ed Pollock, NSW, Australia 1954 3174 Unnamed citron 230626 H. Chapot, Rabat, Morocco 1955 3190 Dabbe (ops) 539418 H. Chapot, Rabat, Morocco 1959 3241 Citrus megaloxycarpa (ops) (Bor-tenga) (hybrid) 539446 Fruit Research Station, Burnihat Assam, India 1957 3487 Kulu “lemon” (ops) 539207 A.G. Norman, Botanical Garden, Ann Arbor MI 1963 3518 Citron of Commerce (ops) 539419 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3519 Citron of Commerce (ops) 539420 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3520 Corsican citron (ops) 539421 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3521 Corsican citron (ops) 539422 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3522 Diamante citron (ops) 539423 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio CA 1966 3523 Diamante citron (ops) 539424 John Carpenter, USDCS, Indio
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Citrus Psyllid Control Program in the Continental United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Asian Citrus Psyllid Marketing and Regulatory Control Program in the Programs Animal and Continental Plant Health Inspection Service United States and Puerto Rico Environmental Assessment August 2010 Asian Citrus Psyllid Control Program in the Continental United States and Puerto Rico Environmental Assessment August 2010 Agency Contact: Osama El-Lissy Director, Emergency Management Emergency and Domestic Programs Animal Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd. Unit 134 Riverdale, MD 20737 __________________________________________________________ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’S TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. __________________________________________________________ Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information. __________________________________________________________ This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical and Physiological Responses of Citrus Megaloxycarpa Lush.: a Cryptic Species of North- East India
    Anatomical and Physiological responses of Citrus megaloxycarpa Lush.: A Cryptic Species of North- East India. Arun Jerang university of science and technology, meghalaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0924-7857 Sony kumari University of Science and Technology, meghalaya Madushmita Borthakur ( [email protected] ) University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya Shahbaaz Ahmed University of Science and Technology, meghalaya Research Article Keywords: Cryptic, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Anticancerous, Therapeutic Posted Date: July 6th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-653063/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/16 Abstract In the historical mysteries and present pandemic situation, the use of citrus fruits makes it rise high among other fruits. Citrus has a signicant role in dietary and medicinal purposes from time immemorial and widely acknowledged for its therapeutic properties. Citrus megaloxycarpa Lush. is an unspecied sibling of the citrus family. The present work highlights the use of the cryptic species of North-East India with its ecient biochemical, antimicrobial, anticancerous properties activity. The aim of this study was to characterize analyzed various biochemical, antioxidant, anticancerous parameters. The peel and pulp extract of ripening large citrus sample indicated as P(L1) and Pu(L2) respectively and unripe small peel and pulp extracts was indicated as P(S1) and Pu(S2) respectively. The extract of the Pu(L2) has the highest total soluble protein whereas the extract of P(L1) demonstrated high in carbohydrate concentration. On quantifying the free amino acid value, the extract of P(L2) showed higher in quantication.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Genetic Resources in California
    Citrus Genetic Resources in California Analysis and Recommendations for Long-Term Conservation Report of the Citrus Genetic Resources Assessment Task Force T.L. Kahn, R.R. Krueger, D.J. Gumpf, M.L. Roose, M.L. Arpaia, T.A. Batkin, J.A. Bash, O.J. Bier, M.T. Clegg, S.T. Cockerham, C.W. Coggins Jr., D. Durling, G. Elliott, P.A. Mauk, P.E. McGuire, C. Orman, C.O. Qualset, P.A. Roberts, R.K. Soost, J. Turco, S.G. Van Gundy, and B. Zuckerman Report No. 22 June 2001 Published by Genetic Resources Conservation Program Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA i This report is one of a series published by the University of California Genetic Resources Conservation Program (technical editor: P.E. McGuire) as part of the public information function of the Program. The Program sponsors projects in the collection, inventory, maintenance, preservation, and utilization of genetic resources important for the State of California as well as research and education in conservation biology. Further information about the Program may be obtained from: Genetic Resources Conservation Program University of California One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 USA (530) 754-8501 FAX (530) 754-8505 e-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.grcp.ucdavis.edu/ Additional copies of this report may be ordered from this address. Citation: Kahn TL, RR Krueger, DJ Gumpf, ML Roose, ML Arpaia, TA Batkin, JA Bash, OJ Bier, MT Clegg, ST Cockerham, CW Coggins Jr, D Durling, G Elliott, PA Mauk, PE McGuire, C Orman, CO Qualset, PA Roberts, RK Soost, J Turco, SG Van Gundy, and B Zuckerman.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Report 61 Years 1953 - 2014 Bureau of Citrus Budwood Registration July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014
    2014 Annual Report 61 Years 1953 - 2014 Bureau of Citrus Budwood Registration July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 Bureau of Citrus Division of Plant Florida Department of Budwood Registration Industry Agriculture and Consumer 3027 Lake Alfred Road (Hwy 17) Plant Industry Helpline Services Winter Haven, FL 33881 888.397.1517 Citrus Health Response Program Phone: 863.298.3041 800.282.5153 Fax: 863.298.3050 Web address: www.freshfromflorida.com/pi/budwood/index.html Michael Kesinger Richard Gaskalla, Director Adam H. Putnam Bureau Chief Wayne Dixon, Assistant Director Commissioner Table of Contents Parent Introductions / Annual Report 2014 STG / Pathogen 1 Highlights of bureau activity in 12 Testing 2013-2014 Pathogen testing and clean-up activity Bureau Staff / Introductions / CBTAC / Participants Releases Current and historic 3 Active nurseries / CBTAC 13 look at new variety introductions membership from within and outside Florida Citrus Nursery Most Popular List of top 20 varieties, clones / rootstocks 4 15 Activity / dooryard propagations Source Trees Budwood Sweet Oranges sources by scion and increase Number of sweet orange nursery 6 block usage - current and 17 propagations made in 2013-2014 historic Mandarin/Grapefruit/ Chiefland Foundation 18 Kumquat/Lemon/Lime/ 8 Budwood Budwood Pummelo propagations cutting recap, statistics Rootstocks Nursery 19 propagations by rootstock Our Vision The Bureau of Citrus Budwood Registration will be diligent in providing high yielding, pathogen tested, quality budlines that will positively impact the productivity and prosperity of our citrus industry. Our Mission The Bureau of Citrus Budwood Registration administers a program to assist growers and nurserymen in producing citrus nursery trees that are believed to be horticulturally true to varietal type, productive, and free from certain recognizable bud-transmissible diseases detrimental to fruit production and tree longevity.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 XI November 2017
    5 XI November 2017 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor:6.887 Volume 5 Issue XI November 2017- Available at www.ijraset.com Studies on Genetic Diversity of Citrus Species Prevalent in Assam Ajanita Mazumdar1, Trishala Das2 1 Department of Biotechnology, Cotton University, Guwahati, India Abstract: With high demand and popular dietary preference, citrus fruit is widely consumed and has become an inseparable part of our diet. Characterized by their distinct aroma and delicious taste, it has been recognized as an important food, playing key roles in supplying energy and nutrients. In Assam various species of Citrus have been cultivated locally which sums up to the mass yield to respond to the increasing need to feed the world population. Considering the importance of citrus plants, the present study was undertaken to determine the inter specific diversity amongst the Citrus species in terms of molecular aspects using restriction profiling .Six locally available Citrus species were selected based on the popularity of the fruits which include C.limon (Lemon), C.aurantifolia (Keylime), C.sinensis (Orange), C.maxima (Pomelo), C.limetta (Mosambi), C.medica (Citron). Molecular weights in terms of base pairs were calculated comparing to a standard DNA marker. C.medica was found to have highest molecular weight of ~ 4000 base pairs followed by C.maxima with molecular weight of ~3800 base pairs .C.limon and C.limetta showed DNA bands of similar size of around 3700 base pairs. C.sinensis showed a band size of ~3500 base pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Citrus Germplasm Introduction Program
    Florida Citrus Germplasm Introduction Program A Publication of the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Volume 1, Issue 4 April - Sept 2010 New Citrus Varieties Released From Quarantine Pub. # DACS-P-01612 Seven new varieties originating from ‘Ota 9’ mandarin (DPI 160) was Importation of foreign citrus is Australia, California, Israel and Italy were released to Dr. Fred Gmitter, UF-CREC prohibited in the state of Florida, released following successful completion for evaluation under Florida growing unless approved by the Director of of shoot-tip grafting, thermaltherapy, conditions. The variety is a seedy diploid the Division of Plant Industry. New laboratory testing and graft-inoculations. hybrid, mandarin crossed with a blood varieties must undergo processing by Italian varieties are licensed and supplied orange (Oroval x Tarocco) with extremely the Citrus Germplasm Introduction by Mr. Giuseppe Reforgiato Recupero, high levels of anthocyanins, flavonones Program, including quarantine, treatment and therapy for the removal Instituto Sperimentale per l’Agrumicoltura. and hydroxycinnnamic acids. Consumption of graft-transmissible pathogens, Israeli varieties are patented and supplied of fruit or juice of this variety could be followed by testing and indexing. New by Mr. Tal Amit, Citrus Marketing Board promoted for its enhanced nutritional value varieties are released from quarantine with budwood originating from the as well as the consumer’s well-being. It is when no pathogen is detected. Citrus Depository of Israel. Of the seven licensed for restricted use, and originates varieties, two arrived infected with graft- from Italy. INSIDE: transmissible agents (DPI 161 ‘Tetraploid TABLE: IMPORTED AND Murcott’ with citrus tristeza virus (CTV) and Tetraploid murcott (DPI 161) was DOMESTIC CITRUS VARIETIES 2 DPI 165 “Winola’ murcott with citrus viroid released to and solely for use by UF- IV (CVdIV)).
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Biosecurity Manual Version 15.0 Current As at June 2021
    Department Department of of Agriculture Agriculture and and Fisheries Fisheries Biosecurity Biosecurity Queensland Queensland Queensland biosecurity manual Version 15.0 current as at June 2021 This publication has been compiled by the Plant Biosecurity and Product Integrity sub-program of Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. © State of Queensland, 2016 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Revision Register Amendments Revision Date of Approval Unit No Change Section Details Officer 1.0 1 July 2016 All New Document M. Cummins PB&PI 2.0 7 September 1, 7, 13, 16 Updates M. Cummins PB&PI 2016 2.1 30 September 1.5, 12A, Updates and deletions R. Sapuppo Panama 2016 12C, 12D, TR4 12E, 12G, 12H 2.2 27 February 4A Updates S.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Poster Setup Welcome Reception Monday February 9
    Sunday February 8: 12:00 PM 9:00 PM Registration 12:00 PM 9:00 PM Poster Setup 7:00 9:00 PM Welcome Reception Monday February 9: Scientific Session 7:00 AM 5:00 PM Registration 7:00 8:00 AM Continental Breakfast 8:00 8:40 AM Welcome and Introductions Jim Graham – Chair Organizing Committee – Welcome and recognitions Jackie Burns – UF-IFAS Dean for Research – Welcome from UF Mike Sparks – Executive Vice President/CEO – Florida Citrus Mutual (Host) Lukasz Stelinski – Instructions for presentations Tim Gottwald – IRCHLB Publications 8:40 8:45AM Introduction of Speaker presented by Tim Gottwald 8:45 9:45 AM Opening Keynote Address An epidemiological perspective for the integrated management of Huanglongbing disease Professor Chris Gilligan, University of Cambridge 9:45 10:15AM Break Session 1: Cultural Control and Epidemiology 1 Moderators: Evan Johnson / Lukasz Stelinski 10:15 1.1 Simulation of the impact of Huanglongbing in the production of citrus groves under disease management scenarios, disease incidences and grove ages at the beginning of the epidemic Monica Bernardo Neves, Renato Beozzo Bassanezi 10:30 1.2 A census-travel predictive model for introduction sites of HLB to inform and optimize detection surveys T. Gottwald, W. Luo, T. Riley 10:45 1.3 HLB epidemics in well managed groves result from primary dissemination from external sources José Belasque, Josicléa H. Arruda, Gressa A. Chinelato, Mathaus A. E. Mandro, Pedro T. Yamamoto, Rodrigo V. Ferreira, Nelson A. Wulff, Armando Bergamin Filho 1 of 22 11:00 1.4 Excess bicarbonate in soil and irrigation water increases fibrous root loss and decline of Huanglongbing-affected citrus trees in Florida Jim Graham, Kayla Gerberich, Diane Bright, Evan Johnson 11:15 1.5 Canine assisted early detection of HLB and integrated strategies for optimized control T.
    [Show full text]
  • Target-Genes Reveal Species and Genotypic Specificity of Anthocyanin Pigmentation in Citrus and Related Genera
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Target-Genes Reveal Species and Genotypic Specificity of Anthocyanin Pigmentation in Citrus and Related Genera 1,2, 1, 1,2 1 Chiara Catalano y, Angelo Ciacciulli y , Fabrizio Salonia , Maria Patrizia Russo , Paola Caruso 1, Marco Caruso 1, Giuseppe Russo 1, Gaetano Distefano 2 and Concetta Licciardello 1,* 1 CREA, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Corso Savoia 190, 95024 Acireale, Italy; [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (M.P.R.); [email protected] (P.C.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (G.R.) 2 Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Via Valdisavoia 5, 95123 Catania, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-095-765-3104 Authors contributed equally to the work. y Received: 4 June 2020; Accepted: 10 July 2020; Published: 16 July 2020 Abstract: Background: Anthocyanin pigmentation characterizes a number of tissues of Citrus and its relatives. The gain and loss of pigmentation is intriguing and is inherited variously among species. Methods: Citrus germplasm was used to investigate the anthocyanin pigmentation of tissues never before considered, including stamen, style and stigma, and of young leaves, petals, rind and flesh of 28 genotypes belonging to 14 species. Citrus genotypes encompassed citron, lemon, sweet orange, lime, and Citrus relatives included Microcitrus, Murraya, and Severinia. A relative qRT-PCR analysis was carried out on the structural and regulatory genes: phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 30-hydroxylase (F3H), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), anthocyanidin synthase (ANS), uridine diphosphate glucose flavonoid glucosyl-transferase (UFGT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), Ruby and Noemi.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Spp
    Citrus Research and Development Foundation, Inc. Grower Day International Research Conference HLB IV WELCOME! March 12, 2015 700 ExperimentMarch 23, 2015 Station Road • Lake Alfred • FL • 33850 863-956-8817 1 citrusrdf.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • Citrus Research and Development Foundation • UF, IFAS, Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred • Staff at Ben Hill Griffin Auditorium – Jen Dawson, Sarah White, others • Florida Citrus Mutual • Organizers – Clark Baxley and Kevin Metheny • Chef Extraordinaire – Rusty Wiygul • IRCHLB Organizing Committee and Program Committee • MarchGrower 23, 2015 Day Reporting Teams 2 Housekeeping • Please move to front seating • Phones silent – Take calls outside • Restrooms off of lobby • Continuing Education Units (CEU) available – Table in lobby • Agenda at your seat • Grower survey – Dr. Ariel Singerman, UF, IFAS CREC • 30 minute presentations + 5 minute Q & A • Lunch served following session March 23, 2015 3 Goals for Grower Day Review IRCHLB presentations before, during and after the conference to capture research findings that have the greatest relevance to Florida Growers • With this goal in mind, the IRCHLB IV Organizing Committee and Scientific Program Committee prepared for this process. • They required authors to include a non-technical summary in their abstracts. • They requested that the oral or poster presentation include a slide or box providing an updated non-technical summary. • Presentations classified into six categories • Corresponding teams recruited to summarize information by category for Grower Day March 23, 2015 4 Categories for Presentation at Grower Day • 1) Non-bearing (yrs 1-3) and 2) Transition into early bearing (yrs 4-7) • 3) Mature trees (yrs 7+) • 4) New scientific discoveries that will lead to progress in delivering solutions, perhaps at a later time • 5) Research from outside Florida (includes other US research and International Research) that may contribute March 23, 2015 5 IRCHLB IV Stats Goals of IRCHLB: 1.
    [Show full text]