Health for Public, Public for Health. Heath Systems in V4 Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health for Public, Public for Health. Heath Systems in V4 Countries Health for Public, Public for Health. Heath systems in V4 countries Health for Public, Public for Health. Heath systems in V4 countries Editors: Piotr Romaniuk Elżbieta Grochowska-Niedworok Lublin 2016 Reviewers: Prof. dr hab. n. med. Teresa Kulik dr hab. n. med. Ryszard Braczkowski dr hab. n. med. Joanna Kasznia-Kocot dr hab. n. med. Ewa Nowakowska-Zajdel dr Piotr Romaniuk dr Elżbieta Prussak Mgr. Iveta Rajničová Nagyová, PhD Zsófia Kollányi, PhD Doc. Ing. Mgr. Martin Dlouhý, Dr., MSc. All of the published articles received a positive review. Typesetting: Ilona Żuchowska Cover design: Marcin Szklarczyk © Copyright by Fundacja na rzecz promocji nauki i rozwoju TYGIEL ISBN 978-83-65272-24-9 Publisher: Fundacja na rzecz promocji nauki i rozwoju TYGIEL ul. Głowackiego 35/348, 20-060 Lublin www.fundacja-tygiel.pl Table of contents Wojciech Boratyński, Aneta Cyndrowska, Anna Marszałek, Paulina Konstancja Mularczyk An analysis of Czech, Hungarian and Polish Presidencies of the Council of the European Union with regard to healthcare ............................................... 9 Tomasz Holecki, Piotr Romaniuk, Adam Szromek Clusters as a tool for system modernization. The features of health policy of Polish local governments .............................................................................. 28 Ewa Pruszewicz-Sipińska, Agata Anna Gawlak Programming of modernization of the public space in a hospital taking into account Evidence-based Design in architectural designing ............................. 40 Piotr Romaniuk, Krzysztof Kaczmarek The EU Directive on the application of patients‟ rights in cross-border healthcare and its impact on provision of healthcare services – experience learned from a survey of selected Polish providers .......................................... 58 Radosław Witczak The use of tax base estimation methods for income tax purposes in the health institutions .................................................................................... 71 Alexandra Bražinová, Veronika Rehorčíková Death certification and mortality reporting across EU countries ..................... 83 Denisa Jakubcová, Martin Rusnák, Viera Rusnáková, Predrag Đurić Effects on quality of communicable diseases notification achieved by provision of access to the EU case definitions for primary care physicians in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................... 93 Maja Miłkowska Involving Citizens in Setting Public Health Agenda in Europe Based on the Example of the European Citizens‟ Initiative. Evidence from V4 Countries Compared to Other EU Countries ................................... 104 Joanna Głogowska-Ligus, Katarzyna Gala, Joanna Kasznia-Kocot, Agata Wypych-Ślusarska, Klaudia Oleksiuk, Andrzej Buschmann, Jerzy Słowiński Evaluation of health programmes and health promotion in Siemianowice Śląskie .............................................................................................................. 124 Jarosława Belowska, Mariusz Panczyk, Aleksander Zarzeka, Halina Żmuda-Trzebiatowska, Barbara Kot-Doniec, Joanna Gotlib Evidence-Based Medicine and Evidence-Based Nursing Practice – knowledge and attitudes of nurses taking a state examination .................... 136 Aleksander Zarzeka,, Sabina Handzel, Mariusz Panczyk, Jarosława Belowska, Joanna Gotlib Knowledge and attitudes of Medical University of Warsaw nursing students towards expanding professional competences of nurses and midwifes ......... 147 Magdalena Syrkiewicz-Świtała The importance of health information obtained via Internet in the opinion of Generation Y in terms of possibility of using social media marketing to promote health services ............................................................................... 160 Katarína Dudáková , Kristína Grendová, Mwavita Juma Training health workers providing of health care to patients with HIV in the region Kwale ......................................................................................... 171 Denisa Jakubcová, Viera Rusnáková, Hannah Kache Needs for training in notifiable diseases surveillance for healthcare workers, Matuga sub-county, Kenya ............................................................................. 186 Joanna Wyka, Monika Bronkowska, Marta Habanova, Malgorzata A. Jarossova Psychological, environmental and socio-economic determinants of school students health status ....................................................................................... 198 Marta Mandziuk Differences in health behaviours among junior high school students from selected schools in County Bialski regarding gender ..................................... 207 Joanna Wyrostek, Jadwiga Pałosz, Wanda Pilch, Anna Piotrowska, Wioleta Dudzic Fitness level and anthropometric indicators in adult men and women exercising regularly ..................................................................... 219 Witold Pawłowski, Wanda Baltaza, Bohdan Starościak, Marcin Padzik, Paweł Zawadzki, Ilona Pilich, Monika Dybicz, Beata Domańska, Lidia Chomicz Effects of Amphizoic Amoeba Spread in Human Environments – Emerging Threat for Public Health in Poland ............................................. 232 Katarzyna Lar, Teresa Bilewicz-Wyrozumska, Karolina Król, Alina Mroczek, Ewa Zbrojkiewicz, Renata Złotkowska The health disorders of children and adolescent in the last decade in the Silesia Voivodeship .................................................. 241 Author index .................................................................................................... 260 Wojciech Boratyński1, Aneta Cyndrowska2, Anna Marszałek3, Paulina Konstancja Mularczyk4 An analysis of Czech, Hungarian and Polish Presidencies of the Council of the European Union with regard to healthcare Introduction Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland are all former members of the Eastern Block. What distinguished them among other countries of the group were similar foreign policy priorities and the opportunities to achieve them. This fact laid the grounds for international cooperation started in 1991 under the name of the Visegrád Triangle. During its Presidency of the Council of the EU, the Member State defines the course of action and assumes a managing, mediatory, representative and symbolic role, presenting the positive qualities of the state internationally. From 1 January to 30 June 2009 the Presidency was held by the Czech Republic, which focused on financial effects of demographic changes and improvement of quality and accessibility of healthcare services. Hungary exercised the Presidency from 1 January to 30 June 2011 and its priority was to ensure sustainability of healthcare systems in light of ageing population and growing health gaps. The Polish Presidency, whose main aim was com- bating inequality in access to healthcare, lasted from 1 July to 31 December 2011. The common priority with regard to free movement of persons was an exchange of information and experiences, as well as promoting mutual understanding between EU Member States, which were all obliged by the cross-border Directive to provide all citizens with equal access to high- quality healthcare services, while preserving their distinctness. 1 Division of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland 2 Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland (past student) 3 Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland (past student) 4 Division of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland 9 Wojciech Boratyński, Aneta Cyndrowska, Anna Marszałek, Paulina Konstancja Mularczyk Aim The paper intends to present priorities and activities of the Visegrád Group in the field of healthcare during its Presidency in the Council of the European Union as well as to assess the cohesion and integrity of those activities. Material and methods The assessment involved an analysis of selected documents regarding the healthcare-related priorities and the arrangement of meetings and conferences during the Presidencies of individual member states of the Visegrád Group. Similarities and differences visible during the Presidencies were analysed. Analyzed documents came in the legal acts of the European Union (EUR- lex), Government websites relating to the Presidency of the European Union and to the Presidency of the V4 Group. Source were published in the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2012. The criterion for the selection of documents were the keywords: the presidency of the EU, the Presidency of the V4, health care, health policy. The documents examined under the angle the similarities and differences in reference to these areas. The history of the European Community After the end of the Second World War, European states agreed that it was necessary to avoid similar tragedies in the future. One of the originators of the idea was Winston Churchill, who proposed to establish a European federation in his speech given at the University of Zurich in September 1946. In 1948 Józef Retinger and Duncan Sandys organised the Congress of Europe in the Hague, where delegates from 25 European countries discussed the unification of Europe [1, 2]. As economic abuse was common in the French sector of the Allied-occupied Germany, Jean Monnet, Commissioner of the French Planning Board, proposed an uncomplicated, technocratic mechanism for France‟s and Germany‟s common raw material market, which led to signing, on 9 May 1950, a declaration enabling
Recommended publications
  • Job Satisfaction of Occupational Medicine Nurses in Poland
    ORIGINAL PAPERS International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 2012;25(1):51 – 58 DOI 10.2478/S13382-012-0006-x JOB SATISFACTION OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE NURSES IN POLAND PIOTR SAKOWSKI Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland Organization and Management in Health Care Unit, Health Policy Department Abstract Objectives: The study aimed at assessment of the Polish occupational medicine service system after over ten years of func- tioning in the current shape, made by occupational nurses. The article focuses on the job satisfaction level among Polish occupational medicine nurses. Materials and Methods: The survey was performed among 600 randomly selected occupa- tional medicine nurses, registered in the regional occupational medicine centers. A questionnaire, designed by the research team, containing several questions concerning different aspects of OMS system assessment, including a part dedicated to job satisfaction assessment, was sent to the selected occupational nurses. The response rate was 33.3% (200 question- naires). Results: The survey shows a relatively high satisfaction level in case of five out of eleven investigated job aspects, and a very low satisfaction level in case of two of them (“Possibility of professional promotion”, “Salary”). 26% of the OMS nurses had considered going abroad to work as a nurse in the general health care system, and 17% in the OHS system. Almost 25% of them would not choose a profession of an occupational nurse once again, including 10% who would not choose a nurse job at all. There is a statistically significant correlation between the general job satisfaction and satisfaction with other aspects of nursing work.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Setting in the Polish Health Care System According to Patients’ Perspective
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Priority Setting in the Polish Health Care System According to Patients’ Perspective Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska * and Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska Department of Management and Logistics in Health Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, 90-131 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Identification of health priorities is concerned with equitable distribution of resources and is an important part of strategic planning in the health care system. The aim of this article is to describe health priorities in the Polish health care system from the patients’ perspective. The study included 533 patients hospitalized in the Lodz region. The average age of the respondents was 48.5 years and one third (36.6%) had university education. Most of the respondents (64.9%) negatively assessed the functioning of the health care system in Poland. Most of them claimed the following aspects require improvements: financing health services (85.8%), determining priorities in health care (80.3%), the role of health insurance (80.3%), and medical education (70.8%). Over 70% of the respondents agreed the role of politicians in designing and implementing health system reforms should be limited. The fact that the respondents so negatively assessed the Polish health care system implies there is a need for full discussion on redefining health priorities. Keywords: setting priorities; health priorities; patients’ opinion; health care financing; health care Citation: Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska, system A.; Rydlewska-Liszkowska, I. Priority Setting in the Polish Health Care System According to Patients’ Perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Health Sector Reform in Poland
    Notes on Health Sector Reform in Poland Peter Berman Associate Professor of International Health Economics Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA 02115, USA Andrzej Rys Director of Health Department, City of Krakow Krakow, Poland Marc Roberts Professor of Political Economy and Health Policy Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA 02115 Paul Campbell Lecturer on Management Department of Health Policy and Management Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA 02115, USA Table of Contents Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 Issues in Health Insurance ...................................................................................................... 2 National Health Insurance (NHI) as an Engine of Reform: ...................................................... 2 Creating The Conditions for Successful Health Financing Reform ...................................... 5 Looking Beyond Health Insurance: Strategies for Transition: .................................................. 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction Since the early 1990’s Poland has been seeking political consensus on a sound strategy for transforming the health care system in the new market economy. The Harvard-Jagiellonian Consortium for Health (Consortium) has been requested to contribute views on the current health reform strategies. This note provides
    [Show full text]
  • Health As an Investment in Poland in the Context of the Roadmap to Implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Health 2020
    Health as an investment in Poland in the context of the Roadmap to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Health 2020 Katarzyna Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Ewa Kocot, Aleksandra Czerw, Grzegorz Juszczyk, Paulina Karwowska, Bettina Menne Abstract The aim of this report is to assess the policy options for investments in health in Poland in the context of the Roadmap to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, building on Health 2020, the European Policy for Health and Well-being. As background, national strategic documents incorporating the concept of health and well-being for all were reviewed and methodological aspects of the health-as-investment approach presented. Methods included a literature review and desk analysis of key national regulations as well as quantitative analysis of indicators used to monitor the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Health 2020 policy implementation. The results indicate that the policy options for investment in health in Poland can be divided into two categories: general guidelines on building and promoting the investment approach and more specific examples of actions on health investments supporting the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Health 2020 strategies. KEYWORDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT HEALTH POLICY INVESTMENT APPROACH RETURN ON INVESTMENT Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe UN City, Marmorvej 51 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office website (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). Citation advice Dubas-Jakóbczyk K, Kocot E, Czerw A, Juszczyk G, Karwowska P, Menne B.
    [Show full text]
  • KSET10001EN C Key in Figure on European Business
    ISSN 1830-9720 KS-ET-10-001-EN-C figuresKey on European business Pocketbooks Key figures on European business with a special feature on the recession This publication summarises the main features of Key figures on European business European business and its different activities in a concise and simple manner. It consists of three main parts. The first chapter presents a special feature with a special feature on the recession on the global financial and economic crisis, looking at how the recession affected the EU’s business economy. The second presents an overview of the with a special feature on the recession EU’s business economy based on structural business statistics (SBS). It provides details concerning the relative importance of the business economy and results from a number of SBS development projects, for example, statistics relating to business demography, or the role of foreign-controlled enterprises within the EU’s business economy, before detailing patterns of specialisation and concentration. The third chapter presents a sectoral analysis looking in more detail at specific sectors within the EU’s business economy on the basis of a comprehensive set of key variables, describing monetary and employment characteristics, as well as a set of derived indicators, for example, productivity and profitability measures, also at a more detailed activity level, as well as by Member States. This publication presents only a small selection of the SBS data available. Readers who are interested in knowing more about SBS, who would like to download the latest publications free-of-charge, or who would like to access the most recent data, are encouraged to consult the structural business statistics dedicated section.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Privileges in the Second Polish Republic
    STudia HiSToriaE oEconomicaE uam Vol. 33 Poznań 2015 Paweł G r a t a (University of Rzeszów) Social priVilEGES in the SEcond Polish RepuBlic The Second Polish Republic developed an advanced and, in many ways, modern system of social care; however, the services which the citizens were entitled to seemed to be privileges available only to a small part of the population. The origins of this situation are to be found in the specific social and occupational structure of the population, low industrialization rate and the modest financial ca­ pabilities of the state and local governments. These resulted in a limited number of people with ac­ cess to social insurances, a limited scope of public health care, a selective nature of access to unem­ ployment insurance or radical differences in access to social care. And it is this unavailability of the social offer which determines the consideration of those benefits in Poland as privileges rather than commonly available rights of the Polish citizens. Keywords: social privilege, social security, health care, social care, the Second Polish Republic doi:10.1515/sho-2015-0002 In the reality of welfare state, social privileges are usually understood as rights or services that all citizens, foreigners or workers migrating within the European Union are unconditionally entitled to as long as they com- ply with specific requirements. Their range is diverse, but the principle of universal access to social benefits of a given state seems indisputable. The Second World War put an end to the world in which the situation (espe- cially in less developed part of Europe) was dramatically different.
    [Show full text]
  • International Migration Outlook 2011: SOPEMI
    www.oecd.org/migration/imo IV. RECENT CHANGES IN MIGRATION MOVEMENTS AND POLICIES (COUNTRY NOTES) Luxembourg Luxembourg is still experiencing population growth quarter of the asylum-seekers arriving in 2009 were and in 2009 crossed the threshold of a half-million originally from Kosovo, and 13% were Iraqi citizens. residents, 43% of whom are foreign nationals. Among the measures instituted to foster the In 2009, 14 600 migrants entered Luxembourg. integration of foreigners in Luxembourg was the Act of This represents a 13% decline as compared 18 December 2009 on access of European Union with 2008 entries, but it is still greater than the levels citizens to the civil service. By adopting this law, the experienced prior to 2007. Portugal remained the parliament sought a general opening of the civil leading country of origin, with more than a quarter of service while at the same time reserving jobs involving the entries. The breakdown of new arrivals by participation in the exercise of public authority for nationality has for that matter been particularly stable Luxembourg citizens, and it maintained the for several years. requirement for knowledge of the country’s three The highlight of 2009 in Luxembourg was the official languages: Luxembourgish, French and entry into force on 1 January of the new law on German. To facilitate learning of the Luxembourgish Luxembourg citizenship, the main feature of which language, the Act of 17 February 2009 introduced was to introduce dual citizenship. An immediate “language leave” – a special, additional period of leave consequence of the law was a sharp increase in to allow persons of any nationality to learn acquisitions of Luxembourg citizenship: from Luxembourgish or improve their knowledge of the 1 200 acquisitions (options and naturalisations) language, in order to facilitate their integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Systems in Transition, Poland
    Health Systems in Transition Vol. 13 No. 8 2011 Poland Health system review Dimitra Panteli and Anna Sagan (editors) and Reinhard Busse (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Editor in chief Elias Mossialos, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Martin McKee, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Richard Saltman, Emory University, United States Editorial team Sara Allin, University of Toronto, Canada Jonathan Cylus, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Matthew Gaskins, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Cristina Hernández-Quevedo, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Marina Karanikolos, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Maresso, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies David McDaid, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sherry Merkur, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Philipa Mladovsky, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Dimitra Panteli, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Bernd Rechel, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Erica Richardson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Sagan, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sarah Thomson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Ewout van Ginneken, Berlin University of Technology, Germany International
    [Show full text]
  • A Tax Benefit Model for Policy Evaluation in Luxembourg: Luxtaxben
    IZA DP No. 9152 A Tax Benefit Model for Policy Evaluation in Luxembourg: LuxTaxBen Nizamul Islam Lennart Flood June 2015 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor A Tax Benefit Model for Policy Evaluation in Luxembourg: LuxTaxBen Nizamul Islam CEPS/INSTEAD Lennart Flood University of Gothenburg and IZA Discussion Paper No. 9152 June 2015 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcelona Objectives the Development of Childcare Facilities for Young Children in Europe with a View to Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
    Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Barcelona objectives The development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth Justice Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*) : 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013 ISBN 978-92-79-29898-1 doi:10.2838/43161 © European Commission, 2013 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Photos: © Fotolia Printed in Belgium Printed on elemental chlorine-free bleached paper (ECF) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Barcelona objectives The development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth Table of contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................4 2. Achieving the Barcelona objectives: a necessity ..............................5 3. State of play ...............................................................7 4. Quality: Still uneven across Europe ..........................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Health Services in Poland: New Evidence on Private Expenditures
    Financing Health Services in Poland: New Evidence on Private Expenditures Mukesh Chawla, PhD Senior Health Economist and Department Associate Department of Population and International Health Harvard School of Public Health 665 Huntington Avenue, Bldg 1-1210 Boston, MA 02115, USA Tel: (617) 432-0998; Fax: (617) 432-2181 email: [email protected] Peter Berman, MSc, PhD Associate Professor of International Health Economics Harvard School of Public Health 665 Huntington Avenue, Bldg 1-1210 Boston, MA 02115, USA Tel: (617) 432-4610; Fax: (617) 432-2181 email: [email protected] Dorota Kawiorska, M.S. Fellow Academy of Economics Racowicka 20, Krakow, Poland Table of Contents Acknowledgments................................................................ii Summary......................................................................iii 1. Introduction...................................................................1 2. Flow of Funds.................................................................2 3. Purpose of the Present Study....................................................4 4. Survey: Purpose and Methodology................................................5 5. National Health Accounts Revisited................................................6 6. Survey Findings on Out-Of-Pocket Expenditure......................................7 (a) Inpatient Services........................................................7 (b) Physician Visits..........................................................9 (c) Dental Visits.............................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Status Outline of EU SAI Contact Committee Working Group Activities
    Status Outline of EU SAI Contact Committee Working Group Activities 2009 Working and Expert Groups Working Group on Structural Funds IV Working Group on National SAI Reports on EU Financial Management Working Group on Activities on Value Added Tax Working Group on Common Auditing Standards Joint Working Group on Audit Activities (JWGAA) Name of WG Working Group on Structural Funds IV “Cost of Controls” In 2008, the Contact Committee tasked the Working Group on Structural Funds to continue its reviews of Structural Funds issues and specifically to carry out an audit on “costs of controls (this might include the use of Purpose/Mandate technical assistance for the controls of Structural Funds)”. The Contact Committee welcomed the Working Group’s intention to submit the report on this audit to the Contact Committee in 2010 (or by 2011, depending on the start of the field work). The Working Group agreed that the audit is to be terminated in 2010. Status/Outcome/ The Working Group adopted a common audit plan and an audit Results in 2009 schedule. The field work for the parallel audit started in June 2009. Links to relevant http://www.contactcommittee.eu working group reports/ documents 26 and 27 February, The Hague: Meeting of the Core Group; consider first draft audit plan and schedule. 31 March and 1 April, Potsdam: Plenary meeting of the Working Group and meeting of the Core Group, discuss draft audit plan, schedule and methodology. Activities this year 11 and 12 May, Bonn: Meeting of the Core Group, finalise draft (meetings etc.) minutes of plenary meeting in Potsdam, finalise draft audit plan.
    [Show full text]