DOCSLIB.ORG

KHM Booklet Velazquez Eng Fuer Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KHM Booklet Velazquez Eng Fuer Pdf EN Velázquez OCTOBER 28,, 2014 – FEBRUARY 15, 2015 ST FLOOR 1 Special exhibition »Velázquez« ■ Picture Gallery ■ Dutch, Flemish and German painting Picture Gallery ■ Italian, Spanish and French painting Entranceexhibition to the VIII 17 16 15 14 1 2 3 4 5 18 XI X IX I II III 6 7 IV 8 XIV XV VII VI V 9 24 13 12 11 INTRODUCTION Velázquez, celebrated as the »painter of paint- 1 Today this Maria Immaculata is regarded as ers« by Édouard Manet, inspired some of his one of Velázquez’ earliest works. When it first greatest fellow artists – Goya, Picasso, Francis appeared on the art market it was attributed Diego Velázquez Bacon: come and fall under his spell in the to Alonso Cano, Velázquez’ fellow pupil in first-ever Velázquez exhibition in Austria! the workshop of Francisco Pacheco. However, THE IMMACULATE following scientific analyses it is now gener- CONCEPTION The Kunsthistorisches Museum holds the largest ally regarded as a work by the then eighteen- collection of portraits by Velázquez outside the c. 1617 year-old Velázquez, possibly executed imme- Prado. For the first time these paintings are Sevilla, Fundación diately after he had completed his training Focus-Abengoa now displayed in the context of the master’s (March 14, 1617). oeuvre. Though not yet a dogma, the Immaculate Con- His early works featuring haunting every-day ception had numerous fervent supporters in scenes, his paintings for the court in Madrid, Seville and was the subject of many passion- portraits of kings and royal children as well as ate debates. of jesters and dwarfs, religious and mytholog- ical scenes, among them the Rokeby Venus, per- In his composition Velázquez follows St. John’s haps the most beautiful nude back ever painted Apocalypse: «a woman clothed with the sun, – all this is on show in the exhibition. with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head«. This composition This booklet comprises the labels of all the differs from Velázquez’ second version (see paintings in the exhibition, inviting you to view no. 2) in the figure’s strict frontality and com- them at your leisure, close up or from a dis- pact silhouette, and the Blessed Virgin’s tance. direct gaze. For more information please see the exhibition catalogue. 2 Velázquez probably painted his second Maria 3 When Velázquez painted this Adoration of Immaculata for the Carmelite monastery in the Magi it was his largest and most ambitious Seville. The order was a particularly fervent composition to date. It was probably commis- Diego Velázquez Diego Velázquez defender of the dogma of the Immaculate Con- sioned by the Jesuits in Seville, with whom ception. the artist’s teacher and father-in-law main- THE IMMACULATE THE ADORATION tained excellent relations. Velázquez’ obvious CONCEPTION OF THE MAGI In a very short span of time the young artist desire to achieve a great degree of authen­­ c. 1618–1619 demonstrated his ability to render a then very 1619 ticity and emotional intensity reflects and cor- London, The National popular and frequently depicted figure in dif- Madrid, Museo responds with the Jesuits’ educational pro- Gallery Nacional del Prado ferent ways: here the Virgin’s eyes are low- gramme. The protagonists were clearly paint- ered to the left, and her cloak is billowing in ed from the life: the aged king on the left is a the same direction, while she has turned slight- portrait of Pacheco, and both the king in the ly to the right. In these subtle and complex foreground and St. Joseph are modelled on counter-movements the second Virgin differs Velázquez’ own features. markedly from the strict frontality of her pre- decessor (see no. 1). These highly individual figures are arranged in a monumental composition, and their pres- The painting was originally displayed in the ence is enhanced by Velázquez’ choice of chapter house of the Carmelite monastery to- strong colour highlights. gether with a painting commensurate to it de- picting St. John on Patmos, i.e. the author of The effective lighting of this nocturnal scene the Apocalypse. Other orders in Seville such shows that the artist was aware of the novel as the Antonites and the Jesuits began to take ideas propagated by Caravaggio and his fol- notice of the young master and commissioned lowers. works from him (see no. 3). 4 Depictions of the Apostles, often as part of a 5 Inscription and size (both of the figures and cycle, were popular in Counter-Reformation of the painting) document that these two art; they were Christ’s original audience, then Apostles belong together; this makes it even Diego Velázquez Diego Velázquez the propagators of his teachings, and finally more impressive how clearly Velázquez dif- the first martyrs of the Catholic Church. ferentiated their characters: the diagonal lance SAINT PAUL SAINT THOMAS and St. Thomas’ profile portrait suggest move- c. 1619–1620 Spain has celebrated series by El Greco and c. 1619–1620 ment, his features express restlessness – Barcelona, Museu Ribera, the Netherlands by Rubens and Van Orléans, Musée des Velázquez is depicting St. Thomas’ doubts, Nacional d’Art de Beaux Arts Dyck. However, only two depictions by which he overcame to proselyte and teach the Catalunya Velázquez are known today; they were prob- word of the Lord. ably once part of a larger ensemble, one most likely commissioned for the Carthusian mon- In India, St. Thomas was martyred with a astery Santa Maria de las Cuevas in Seville. lance; it is also the weapon with which Christ’s Velázquez depicts St. Paul without his sword, side was pierced, the very wound into which i.e. not as a martyr but as the author of the doubting Thomas had to place his fingers be- Epistles – hence the large book. The figure’s fore believing that the man in front of him monumental compactness expresses the saint’s was truly the Risen Christ. strong, steadfast character, while the shimmer of light surrounding the Apostle’s head de- We encounter the young man Velázquez used notes the divine sphere. The impressive ren- as a model for his Apostle in a number of dering of his features is based on a thorough works from this period: for example he is one study of nature. of the Peasants at Table (no. 8), and the vio- linist in The Three Musicians (no. 7). 6 All four Gospels record the denial of Saint 7 Three Musicians is regarded as the artist’s earl i- Peter: thrice he denied knowing Jesus, but af- est extant work in the genre then known as ter his third denial he heard the rooster crow bodegones (cookshops or inns). Velázquez did Diego Velázquez Diego Velázquez for the first time and recalled the Lord’s pre- not invent this genre, but – clearly aware of diction of his faithlessness. Theologians have Caravaggio’s work – he developed it dramat- THE TEARS OF THREE MUSICIANS interpreted it as an example of repentance ically. Showing a profound love of experiment- SAINT PETER and penitence, and as a precursor of the sac- c. 1617–1618 ing, the eighteen-year-old artist painted what c. 1618–1619 rament of confession. Berlin, Staatliche were then regarded as lowly scenes depicting Museen, Gemäldegalerie Madrid, Collection drinking musicians. Villar Mir Most of the versions by Velazquez’ contem- poraries usually focus on depicting emotions, His teacher Pacheco described such compo- showing Saint Peter crying, his head bent in sitions as »ridiculous figures in various ugly shame, the rooster at his side. subject matters that are intended to make one laugh«. The boy on the left is doing exactly Not so Velázquez: as the new day dawns in that: he has stopped playing his vihuela, raised the background he depicts the moment that his full glass and faces us, laughing. And we precedes Peter’s tears, and the terrible reali- understand: the two musicians’ ecstatic con- zation of his faithlessness is reflected in his centration is probably the result of having face. drunk too much. No less than six extant copies and versions of this compositions bear witness to its popular- ity. The one on show here is regarded as the earliest and best, and is generally attributed to Velázquez. 8 There are two possible explanations for the 9 Many regard this as Velázquez’ best work from uneven handling in this painting: it is either his early years in Seville, and it is undoubted- in a deplorable condition, with large areas ly the most important of his bodegones. Diego Velázquez Diego Velázquez overpainted by a later hand, or a co-produc- tion between Velázquez and one of his assist- The artist achieved such a degree of verisim- PEASANTS THE WATERSELLER ants. Today, most art historians support the ilitude that the scene seems to take place in AT TABLE latter explanation. c. 1622 front of our eyes. In fact, the composition is (EL ALMUERZO) London, Apsley House, so carefully balanced and arranged as to re- The Wellington c. 1618–1620 The young man on the right (possibly the semble a regal ceremony. Then ubiquitous Collection Budapest, model also used for Saint Thomas; see no. 5) throughout Europe, watersellers were essen- Szépmu´´vészeti Múzeum is most probably by Velázquez himself, an at- tial in Seville. Nonetheless, they were ranked tribution supported by the lighting and the near the bottom of the social pyramid. But natural modelling of his skin and clothes. Velázquez reverses this completely and im- bues the old man with dignity, although the The composition evolved out of the undoubt- higher social status of the boy clutching the edly autograph table scene now in the Her- full glass is clearly indicated by his fine clothes mitage in St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Observing Protest from a Place
    VISUAL AND MATERIAL CULTURE, 1300-1700 Knox Giles Knox Sense Knowledge and the Challenge of Italian Renaissance Art El Greco, Velázquez, Rembrandt of Italian Renaissance Art Challenge the Knowledge Sense and FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Sense Knowledge and the Challenge of Italian Renaissance Art FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Visual and Material Culture, 1300–1700 A forum for innovative research on the role of images and objects in the late medieval and early modern periods, Visual and Material Culture, 1300–1700 publishes monographs and essay collections that combine rigorous investigation with critical inquiry to present new narratives on a wide range of topics, from traditional arts to seemingly ordinary things. Recognizing the fluidity of images, objects, and ideas, this series fosters cross-cultural as well as multi-disciplinary exploration. We consider proposals from across the spectrum of analytic approaches and methodologies. Series Editor Dr. Allison Levy, an art historian, has written and/or edited three scholarly books, and she has been the recipient of numerous grants and awards, from the Nation- al Endowment for the Humanities, the American Association of University Wom- en, the Getty Research Institute, the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library of Harvard University, the Whiting Foundation and the Bogliasco Foundation, among others. www.allisonlevy.com. FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Sense Knowledge and the Challenge of Italian Renaissance Art El Greco, Velázquez, Rembrandt Giles Knox Amsterdam University Press FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS This book was published with support from the Office of the Vice Provost for Research, Indiana University, and the Department of Art History, Indiana University.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudios De Platería. San Eloy 2011
    ESTUDIOS DE PLATERÍA. SAN ELOY 2011 Jesús Rivas Carmona (Coord.) ESTUDIOS DE PLATERÍA. SAN ELOY 2011 UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA 2011 Estudios de platería, San Eloy 2011 / Jesús Rivas Carmona (Coord.).– Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2011 568 p. ISBN: 978-84-8371-214-6 1. Platería – Estudios y conferencias. 2. Orfebrería – Estudios y conferencias. I. Rivas Carmona, Jesús.– II. Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones. III. Título 739.1 (082.2) 1ª Edición, 2011 Reservados todos los derechos. De acuerdo con la legislación vigente, y bajo las sanciones en ella previstas, queda totalmente prohibida la reproducción y/o transmisión parcial o total de este libro, por procedimientos mecánicos o electrónicos, incluyendo fotocopia, grabación magnética, óptica o cualesquiera otros procedimientos que la técnica permita o pueda permitir en el futuro, sin la expresa autorización por escrito de los propietarios del copyright. © Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2011 ISBN: 978-84-8371-214-6 Depósito Legal MU-1.286-2011 Impreso en España −Printed in Spain Imprime: F.G. Graf, S.L. [email protected] A la ciudad de Lorca, centro y obrador de platería Índice PRÓLOGO........................................................................................................... 17 María Concepción García Gainza Fiel Contraste de Honor San Eloy 2010 ESTUDIOS Plateros de Guatemala. Don Juan de Barreneche y Aguirre y el legado de Lesaca ..................................................................................................................... 23 Javier Abad Viela Arquitecto Orefi ceria siciliana nei musei madrileni ............................................................. 43 Lucia Ajello Università degli Studi di Palermo La partición de la plata y las joyas de Isabel de Valois: la herencia de la infanta Catalina Micaela....................................................................................... 53 María Albaladejo Martínez Universidad de Murcia La joyería femenina del siglo XVIII en la Nueva España a través del retrato..
    [Show full text]
  • 3"T *T CONVERSATIONS with the MASTER: PICASSO's DIALOGUES
    3"t *t #8t CONVERSATIONS WITH THE MASTER: PICASSO'S DIALOGUES WITH VELAZQUEZ THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Joan C. McKinzey, B.F.A., M.F.A. Denton, Texas August 1997 N VM*B McKinzey, Joan C., Conversations with the master: Picasso's dialogues with Velazquez. Master of Arts (Art History), August 1997,177 pp., 112 illustrations, 63 titles. This thesis investigates the significance of Pablo Picasso's lifelong appropriation of formal elements from paintings by Diego Velazquez. Selected paintings and drawings by Picasso are examined and shown to refer to works by the seventeenth-century Spanish master. Throughout his career Picasso was influenced by Velazquez, as is demonstrated by analysis of works from the Blue and Rose periods, portraits of his children, wives and mistresses, and the musketeers of his last years. Picasso's masterwork of High Analytical Cubism, Man with a Pipe (Fort Worth, Texas, Kimbell Art Museum), is shown to contain references to Velazquez's masterpiece Las Meninas (Madrid, Prado). 3"t *t #8t CONVERSATIONS WITH THE MASTER: PICASSO'S DIALOGUES WITH VELAZQUEZ THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Joan C. McKinzey, B.F.A., M.F.A. Denton, Texas August 1997 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to acknowledge Kurt Bakken for his artist's eye and for his kind permission to develop his original insight into a thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Me Llamo Don Carlos
    ME LLAMO DON CARLOS Teachers’ Notes Spanish Language Workshop for Year 3 and Year 4 at the Wallace Collection Me Llamo Don Carlos Teachers’ Notes Spanish Language Workshop for Year 3 and Year 4 at the Wallace Collection ‘Velázquez found the perfect balance Information for teachers between the ideal illustration which he Diego Velázquez, 1599 – 1660 was required to produce, and the overwhelming emotion he aroused in Baptised on 6 June 1599 in Seville where he studied the spectator.’ briefly under Francisco Herrera the Elder in 1610 and with Francisco Pacheco 1611-17. In 1618 he married Francis Bacon Pacheco's daughter, Juana de Miranda, by whom he had two daughters, born in 1619 and 1621. In the magnificent setting of the Wallace Collection, pupils will discover masterpieces from Velázquez and his studio while reviewing what In 1623 he was summoned by the King's First they have learnt in their Spanish language classes Minister, Olivares, to Madrid, and in October was at school. appointed painter to the King. He remained attached to the Court of Philip IV for the rest of his life, During this fun and interactive session –which engaged principally in portraiture, and holding a will be conducted primarily in Spanish- pupils will succession of Court appointments: Gentleman Usher learn more about painter Diego Velázquez, they 1627, Gentleman of the Wardrobe 1636, Gentleman will be able to ask Prince Baltasar Carlos lots of of the Bedchamber 1643, and Palace Chamberlain questions, and understand why he is wearing this 1652. particular outfit. Finally, they will meet the Lady with A Fan and In 1628/9 he met Rubens in Madrid.
    [Show full text]
  • El Paragone Velazqueño. Reflexiones a Partir Del Retrato De Juan Martínez Montañés
    Laboratorio de Arte, 23-2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/LA.2011.i23.10 EL paragone VELAZqUEÑO. REFLEXIONES A partir DEL retrato DE JUAN Martínez Montañés THE VELAZqUEZIAN PARAGONE. REFLECTIONS ON THE PORTRAIT OF JUAN MARTÍNEZ MONTAÑÉS Por FranCisCo JaVier naVarro moragas Escuela de Arte de Sevilla Hacia mediados del año 1635 el escultor Martínez Montañés es llamado a la corte para la ejecución de un busto de Felipe IV. Su estancia en Madrid permite a su amigo Velázquez la ocasión de inmortalizarlo, efigiándolo en el retrato donde aparece con el objeto de su empresa. Pero en este cuadro, más allá de la apa- riencia verosímil, el velo del tiempo ha obscurecido la esencia de su discurso, firme alegato contra el sofisma del paragone que desterraba al escultor del edénico recinto de las artes liberales. El hálito vivificador de una hermeneusis razonada habrá de disipar el velo que la enturbia, dejando al descubierto los nítidos perfiles del pensamiento velazqueño hacia la dignificación de la Escultura comoArte Superior. palabras clave: Velázquez, Montañés, paragone, escultura, hermenéutica. By mid-1635 the sculptor Martínez Montañés is summoned to the court to carry out a bust of Philip IV. His stay in Madrid gives his friend Velázquez the opportunity to immortalise him, making his effigy in the portrait where he appears with the object of his undertaking. But in this painting, beyond its appearance of verisimilitude, the veil of time has obscured the essence of its discourse, a firm declaration against the sophism of the paragone which exiled the sculptor from the edenic circle of liberal arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of Children at the Spanish Court in the Seventeenth Century: the Infanta Margarita and the Young King Carlos II
    Bulletin for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies Journal of the Association for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies Volume 35 | Issue 1 Article 3 2011 Portraits of Children at the Spanish Court in the Seventeenth Century: The nfI anta Margarita and the Young King Carlos II Mercedes Llorente University College London, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.asphs.net/bsphs Recommended Citation Llorente, Mercedes (2011) "Portraits of Children at the Spanish Court in the Seventeenth Century: The nfaI nta Margarita and the Young King Carlos II," Bulletin for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies: Vol. 35 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. https://doi.org/10.26431/0739-182X.1004 Available at: https://digitalcommons.asphs.net/bsphs/vol35/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Association for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies by an authorized editor of Association for Spanish and Portuguese Historical Studies. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Portraits of Children at the Spanish Court in the Seventeenth Century: The nfI anta Margarita and the Young King Carlos II Cover Page Footnote I thank you the Kress Foundation for giving me an award to attend the 98th CAA Annual Conference in Chicago, February 10-13, 2010. Part of this article was presented on Friday 12, at the session The orP trait in Golden-Age Spain: Expanding the Frame. I would like to thank the chair of the session Laura R. Bass & Tanya J. Tiffany.
    [Show full text]
  • Velazquez's Las Meninas
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-80057-0 - Velázquez’s Las Meninas Edited by Suzanne L. Stratton-Pruitt Excerpt More information 1 suzanne l. stratton-pruitt INTRODUCTION King Philip IV of Spain died in 1666, six years after the death of his court painter Diego de Velazquez´ y Silva. As required by the king’s death, the painter Juan Bautista Mart´ınez del Mazo, Velazquez’s´ son-in-law, proceeded to inventory the royal collection of paintings. In this 1666 inventory, the first written record of a work created in 1656, Mazo described a large painting “portraying” the Infanta Margarita with “her ladies-in-waiting [meninas] and a female dwarf, by the hand of Velazquez.”´ The first substantive description of the painting is in a manuscript treatise on painting, dated 1696, by the Portuguese Felix da Costa: To Diego de Velazquez´ the painter, Philip IV,King of Castile, gave the order of Santiago, which is the chief honor of that realm, as well as the key of the [royal] chamber. His own wit perpetuated this honor in a picture which adorns a room of the palace at Madrid, showing the portrait of the Empress, the daughter of Philip IV, together with his own. Velazquez´ painted himself in a cape bearing the cross of Santiago, with the key [to the chamber] at his belt, and holding a palette of oils and brushes in the act of painting, with his glance upon the Empress, and putting his hand with the brush to the canvas. At his left, and on the other side of the picture, we see the little Princess standing among kneeling ladies-in-waiting who are amusing her.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Papeles De Velázquez
    Los Papeles de Velázquez John Phillips August 2007 A hand emerges from a lace cuff, pointed out tiny scraps of paper secreted and droops over the arm of a chair. It is in the corners of Velázquez’s Lances and painted impressionistically, and appears Equestrian Portrait of Philip IV. ‘These bits relaxed. Yet clutched between the thumb of paper serve no purpose in the paintings’, and forefinger, a folded sheet of paper twists she declared with mild indignation, ‘they awkwardly, contravenes perspective, and are blank’. Could I explain them? I shook pushes forward to petition the viewer. This my head. A tiny scrap of paper buried in a small dramatic detail, set against a velvet composition, we reasoned, might carry an backcloth, is a fragment of a full-length inscription or a signature, but blank slips portrait of Archbishop Fernando de Valdés. were either an enigma or an oversight. ‘Had The exactingly carefree brushstrokes and someone, perhaps Velázquez, over-painted inscription on the contorted sheet identify them?’ ‘Had he overlooked to sign these Velázquez as its painter. Whoever cut this paintings off?’ ‘Might similar fragments, fragment from the larger canvas, considering half-hidden in other paintings, provide more perhaps that value resided in its signature, clues?’ ‘What messages or meanings lay may have unintentionally revealed something buried in these unwritten documents?’ were hidden in the larger composition; the artist’s questions that we raised, but had no means aspiration inscribed on an imaginary sheet to answer. So, in the days that followed, I of paper. 2 resolved to investigate the artist through the My interest in Velázquez’s papers narrow prism of his papers.
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Entertaining Brochure [PDF 6.6MB]
    YOUR EVENT AT THE NATIONAL GALLERY Phone: +44 20 7747 5931 · Email: [email protected] · Twitter: @NG_EventsLondon · Instagram: @ngevents We are one of the most visited galleries in the world. Located on Trafalgar Square, we have stunning views of Nelson’s Column, Westminster and beyond. Surround your guests with some of the world’s greatest paintings by artists such as Leonardo, Monet and Van Gogh. Our central location, magnificent architecture and spectacular spaces never fail to impress. 2 The Portico The Mosaic Central Hall Room 30 The Barry Annenberg Gallery A The Yves Saint The Wohl Room The National Café The National Terrace Rooms Court Laurent Room Dining Room East Wing East Wing East Wing East Wing East Wing East Wing North Wing North Wing West Wing East Wing Sainsbury Wing Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 14 Page 15 3 THE PORTICO With unrivalled views overlooking Trafalgar Square, the Portico Terrace is our most impressive outdoor event space. Breakfast 100 · Reception 100 · Reception including foyer 250 · Dinner 60 Level 2 DID YOU KNOW … The relief above the Portico entrance shows two young women symbolising Europe and Asia. This relief was originally intended for John Nash’s Marble Arch. 4 · East Wing THE MOSAIC TERRACE Step inside the Gallery onto our historic mosaic floor, beautifully lit by a domed glass ceiling. This unique artwork by Boris Anrep combines an ancient technique with contemporary personalities of 1930’s Britain such as Greta Garbo and Virginia Woolf.
    [Show full text]
  • JOAQUÍN SOROLLA Y BASTIDA Spanish, 1863-1923 the Daughters
    JOAQUÍN SOROLLA Y BASTIDA Spanish, 1863-1923 The Daughters of Rafael Errázuriz Signed and dated J Sorolla Bastida/ 1897 Oil on canvas 89½ x 54¾ inches (227.5 x 139 cm) Framed: 97 x 62 inches (246.5 x 157.5 cm) This portrait of the three eldest daughters of Rafael Errázuriz Urmeneta and his wife Elvira Valdés Ortúzar de Errázuriz, of Valparaiso, Chile, was painted in Madrid based on photographs. Sorolla included a cameo self-portrait reflected in the mirror, which borrows from a similar motif in Las Meninas, the masterpiece by Velázquez in the Museo del Prado which was much admired by Sorolla. Also reflected in the mirror is the full-length portrait of the girls' mother which Sorolla had painted earlier the same year, and is now in the collection of the Museo Nacional Bellas Artes, Santiago, Chile. The mirror and console depicted in this work are in the Museo Sorolla, Madrid. Rafael Errázuriz was a wealthy Chilean politician, diplomat and Ambassador to the Holy See in Rome, with houses in Paris and Biarritz and a large estate and vineyard in Chile. He first met Sorolla in 1895 and, subsequent to the completion of the portraits of his wife and Continued on the next page JOAQUÍN SOROLLA Y BASTIDA, continued daughters, commissioned the artist to paint a portrait of the entire Errázuriz family, which Sorolla completed in 1905. That monumental work, measuring 89 x 131 inches (226 x 333 cm), was included in the traveling Sargent / Sorolla exhibition of 2006 and is in the Masaveu Collection, Madrid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Looking-Glass World: Mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite Painting 1850-1915
    THE LOOKING-GLASS WORLD Mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite Painting, 1850-1915 TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I Claire Elizabeth Yearwood Ph.D. University of York History of Art October 2014 Abstract This dissertation examines the role of mirrors in Pre-Raphaelite painting as a significant motif that ultimately contributes to the on-going discussion surrounding the problematic PRB label. With varying stylistic objectives that often appear contradictory, as well as the disbandment of the original Brotherhood a few short years after it formed, defining ‘Pre-Raphaelite’ as a style remains an intriguing puzzle. In spite of recurring frequently in the works of the Pre-Raphaelites, particularly in those by Dante Gabriel Rossetti and William Holman Hunt, the mirror has not been thoroughly investigated before. Instead, the use of the mirror is typically mentioned briefly within the larger structure of analysis and most often referred to as a quotation of Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait (1434) or as a symbol of vanity without giving further thought to the connotations of the mirror as a distinguishing mark of the movement. I argue for an analysis of the mirror both within the context of iconographic exchange between the original leaders and their later associates and followers, and also that of nineteenth- century glass production. The Pre-Raphaelite use of the mirror establishes a complex iconography that effectively remytholgises an industrial object, conflates contradictory elements of past and present, spiritual and physical, and contributes to a specific artistic dialogue between the disparate strands of the movement that anchors the problematic PRB label within a context of iconographic exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalí, Picasso, Velázquez: Measuring up by ELLIOTT H
    ©Elliott H. King, 2015 Dalí, Picasso, Velázquez: Measuring Up By ELLIOTT H. KING “I’ve always said I’m a very bad painter because I’m too intelligent to be a good painter. To be a good painter, you’ve got to be a bit stupid, with the exception of Velázquez, who is a genius and whose talent surpasses the art of painting.” – Salvador Dalí[1] The year 1960 marked the 300th anniversary of the death of Spanish artist Diego Velázquez, in- citing a flurry of commemorative exhibitions, books, and other popular and scholarly studies around the globe.[2] The occasion could not have been overlooked by Spain’s two most promi- nent artists, Pablo Picasso and Salvador Dalí, each of whom executed his own reinterpretations of Velázquez’s paintings in the years directly preceding and following the tri-centennial. This essay considers these bodies of work, albeit in a somewhat round-about fashion. For Picasso, I will look, as a group, to the fifty-eight paintings he executed on the theme of Velázquez’s paint- ing Las Meninas (1656) in 1957, and for Dalí, to his handful of paintings and statements extoling Velázquez as a precursor to atomic physics and contemporary action painting, spearheaded by his 1958 canvas, Velázquez Painting the Infanta Margarita with the Lights and Shadows of His Own Glory. While I intend to compare and contrast the two artists’ approaches to Velázquez in the late-1950s and early-1960s, I have chosen a somewhat unorthodox framework to facilitate the question. Dali welcomed comparisons between his work and that of Picasso, whom he called the other great “genius” of Spain (in addition to himself).[3] Having reinvented himself as a “classic” painter in 1941, Dalí launched a barrage of defamatory statements and back-handed compliments against Picasso that pitted his own Renaissance-revival style against what he described in 1956 as Picasso’s “pure bestiality.”[4] From amongst Dalí’s myriad proclamations, I have located a rather fleeting one that strikes me as ranking amongst his most memorable and opaque.
    [Show full text]